Submit Manuscript

International Journal of Dairy Science

Year: 2016 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 124-129
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Article Trend

Total views 83

Authors

Ester Grilli

Helene Tormo

Mattia Fustini

Chloe Deneufbourg

Marina Losio

Andrea Formigoni

Frederique Chaucheyras- Durand

Henri Durand

Keywords

Live Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast strains are widely used as feed additives for dairy cows. Although, perfectly safe and applied in several food processes, the potential contamination of milk by the strain and more generally its possible influence on the microbial profile of milk could be questioned, this concerns particularly traditional cheeses made with raw milk. In an attempt to address these questions, two experiments were performed: A trial in an experimental farm, where two groups of cows, one receiving yeast supplementation and the other one being an unsupplemented control, were compared and a field trial where herds received alternatively yeast-supplemented and control diets. In both cases, viable counts of different microbial groups, including yeasts and molds in general and S. cerevisiae in particular were analysed in tank milk and results from supplemented groups or periods were compared with control ones. No viable S. cerevisiae were detected in any of the samples analysed. Moreover, no noticeable differences in the microbial profiles were observed. This applies also to the evolution of the microbial composition during an experimental cheese processing trial. These data suggest that live yeast additive distributed to dairy cows does not influence milk microbial composition and cheese-making abilities.
PDF Fulltext XML References Citation

How to cite this article

Ester Grilli, Helene Tormo, Mattia Fustini, Chloe Deneufbourg, Marina Losio, Andrea Formigoni, Frederique Chaucheyras- Durand and Henri Durand, 2016. Is Raw Milk Microbiota Influenced by the use of Live Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as Ruminant Feed Additive?. International Journal of Dairy Science, 11: 124-129.

DOI: 10.3923/ijds.2016.124.129

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijds.2016.124.129

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *