Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Studies on Indoor Culture of Indus Golden Mahseer (Tor macrolepis) in Central Punjab, Pakistan



Anser Mahmood Chatta, Zulfiqar Ahmad, Sikender Hayat and Sajid Ali Naqvi
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Studies were conducted to investigate the survival and growth performance of hatchery reared, semi-cold water, Indus golden mahseer (Tor macrolepis) fingerlings in indoor cemented tanks on different feed rations in Central Punjab. There were three ration levels; 4, 5 and 6% of live body weight of fish, designated as treatment 1 (T1), treatment 2 (T2) and treatment 3 (T3), respectively. Each treatment was run in triplicate. Fish were housed in 9 indoor cemented tanks of 6 m3 each and experiment was continued for 150 days from October to March. Ninety fingerlings of uniform size were stocked in each tank at 15 fish/m3. Feed prepared from locally available ingredients, containing 43% crude protein was offered to all treatments with different ration levels mentioned earlier. Temperature (°C), dissolved oxygen (mg/l) and pH were monitored on daily basis twice a day and kept within optimal ranges required for fish culture through aeration and partial exchange of water. The results reveal that this game fish, Tor macrolepis can survive successfully and grow comfortably under monoculture in Central Punjab. The difference in ration size however, influenced the growth of fingerlings but not the survival. Maximum final weight i.e., 15.52±0.448 g was observed in T3 that significantly differed from T2 (13.60±0.368 g) and T1 (12.97±0.367 g). Net weight gain increased significantly with the increase in ration rate. PWG and SGR were higher in T3 as compared to T2 and T1 at p<0.05. T2 and T3 had high values of FCR than T1, while FCE was significantly high in T1, followed by T2 and T3. So, ration rate was directly related to NWG, PWG, SGR and FCR and had inverse relation to FCE.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Anser Mahmood Chatta, Zulfiqar Ahmad, Sikender Hayat and Sajid Ali Naqvi, 2015. Studies on Indoor Culture of Indus Golden Mahseer (Tor macrolepis) in Central Punjab, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 14: 229-233.

DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2015.229.233

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjn.2015.229.233

REFERENCES
1:  Al-Hafedh, Y.S., 1999. Effects of dietary protein on growth and body composition of nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Aquac. Res., 30: 385-393.

2:  AOAC., 1995. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA.

3:  Ayub, M., I. Ahmad and K. Pervaiz, 2007. Breeding of Tor putitora with and without hypophysation at hattian nursery unit district Attock, Punjab-Pakistan. Mahseer: The biology, culture and conservation. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Mahseer, March 29-30, 2006, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, pp: 99-106.

4:  Bista, J., B.R. Poradhan, A.K. Rai, T.K. Shrestha and T.B. Gurung, 2000. Nutrition, feed and feeding of golden mahseer (Tor putitora) for domestication and production in Nepal. Fish Technical Paper, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy, pp: 107-117.

5:  Chatta, A.M. and M. Ayub, 2010. Growth performance of hatchery reared golden mahseer (Tor macrolepis) at Sialkot, Pakistan. Biologia, 56: 1-8.
Direct Link  |  

6:  Dabrowski, K., 1977. Protein requirements of grass carp fry (Ctenopharyngodon idella Val.). Aquaculture, 12: 63-73.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

7:  Das, I. and A.K. Ray, 1989. Growth performance of Indian major carps Labeo rohita (Ham.) on duckweed incorporated pelleted feed: A preliminary study. J. Inland Fish., 21: 1-6.

8:  De Silva, S.S. and F.B. Davy, 1992. Fish nutrition research for semi-intensive culture system in Asia. Asian Fish. Sci., 5: 129-144.

9:  Ghosh, S.K., B.K. Mandal and D.N. Borthakur, 1984. Effects of feeding rates on production of common carp and water quality in paddy-cum fish culture. Aquaculture, 40: 97-101.

10:  Haque, M.Z., M.A. Rahman and M.M. Hossain, 1993. Studies on the effect of stocking densities on the growth and survival of mrigal (Cirrhinus mrigala) fry in rearing ponds. Bangladesh J. Zool., 21: 51-58.

11:  Islam, M.S., 2002. Evaluation of supplementary feeds for semi-intensive pond culture of mahseer, Tor putitora (Hamilton). Aquaculture, 212: 263-276.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

12:  Joshi, C.B., K.L. Sehgal and K.C. Malkani, 1989. Experimental trials on feeding of Tor putitora with formulated diets at Bhimtal in Kumaon Himalayas. J. Anim. Sci., 59: 206-209.

13:  Kaushik, S.J., 1998. Nutritional bioenergetics and estimation of waste production in non-salmonids. Aquatic Living Resourc., 11: 211-217.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

14:  Kohinoor, A.H.M., M.Z. Haque, M.G. Hussain and M.V. Gupta, 1994. Growth and survival rate of Thai punti, Puntius gonionotus (Bleeker) spawn in nursery ponds at different stocking densities. J. Asiatic Soc. Bangladesh Sci., 20: 65-72.

15:  Mirza, M.A., 1994. A note on the fishes of the river Hingol, Pakistan. Pak. J. Zool., 26: 181-181.

16:  Mirza, M.R., 2004. Status of golden mahseer (Pisces: Cyprinidae) of the Indus river system. Rec. Zool. Surv. Pak., 15: 42-44.

17:  Mirza, M.R., M.N. Javed and M. Tariq, 1994. A note on the fish fauna of the river Zhob, Pakistan. Pak. J. Zool., 26: 189-189.

18:  Misieng, J.D., M.S. Kamarudin and M. Musa, 2011. Optimum dietary protein requirement of Malaysian mahseer (Tor tambroides) fingerling. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 14: 232-235.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

19:  Mohan, M. and Y. Basade, 2005. Effects of available diets with different protein to energy ratios on growth, nutrient utilization and body composition of juvenile Himalayan Golder Mahseer, Tor putitora (Hamilton). Asian Fisher. Sci., 18: 277-283.

20:  Nautiyal, P., 1994. The Endangered Golden Mahseer in Garhwal Himalaya: A Decade of Retrospection. In: Threatened Fish of India, Dehadrai, P.V. P. Das and S.R. Verma (Eds.). Nature Conservators Corporation, (IUCN), Allahabad, India, pp: 191-196.

21:  Ogale, S.N., 2002. Mahseer Breeding and Conservation and Possibilities of Commercial Culture. In: The India Experience, Petr, T. and D.B. Swar (Eds.). Tata Power Company Ltd., Lonavla, pp: 193-212.

22:  Parveen, S., I. Ahmed, A. Mateen, M. Hameed and F. Rasool, 2012. Substitution of animal protein with plant protein fed to Labeo rohita and Cirrhinus mrigala and its effect on growth and carcass composition. Pak. J. Agric. Sci., 49: 569-575.
Direct Link  |  

23:  Pervaiz, K., Z. Iqbal, M.R. Mirza, M.N. Javed and M. Naeem, 2012. Meristic and morphometric studies on indus mahseer Tor macrolepis (Teleostei: Cyprinidae) from district Attock, Pakistan. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 14: 169-175.
Direct Link  |  

24:  Rahman, M.A., M.A. Mazid, M.R. Rahman, M.N. Khan, M.A. Hossain and M.G. Hussain, 2005. Effect of stocking density on survival and growth of critically endangered mahseer, Tor putitora (Hamilton), in nursery ponds Aquaculture, 249: 275-284.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

25:  Reddy, S.R. and S. Katre, 1979. Growth rate and conversion efficiency of the air-breathing catfish, Heteropneustes fossilis, in relation to ration size. Aquaculture, 18: 35-40.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

26:  Sawhney, S. and R. Gandotra, 2010. Growth response and feed conversion efficiency of Tor putitora (Ham.) fry at varying dietary protein levels. Pak. J. Nutr., 9: 86-90.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

27:  Sehgal, K.L., 1999. Cold water Fish and Fisheries in the Indian Himalayas: Rivers and Streams. In: Fish and Fisheries at Higher Altitudes: Asia, Petr, T. (Ed.). FAO, Rome, pp: 41-63.

28:  Shrestha, T.K., 2000. Ranching mahseer Tor tor and Tor putitora in the running waters of Nepal. Fish Technical Paper, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Italy, pp: 297-300.

29:  Siddiqui, A.Q., M.S. Howlader and A.A. Adam, 1988. Effects of dietary protein levels on growth, feed conversion and protein utilization in fry and young Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus. Aquaculture, 70: 63-73.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

30:  Singh, N.O., M.W. Alam, A.K. Paul and S. Kumar, 2009. Length-weight relationship and growth pattern of Tor putitora (Hamilton) under monoculture and polyculture systems: A case study. J. Ind. Soc. Agril. Statist., 63: 85-89.
Direct Link  |  

31:  Sunder, S., H.S. Raina and U. Naulia, 1998. Preliminary feeding trials on juveniles of golden mahseer, Tor putitora (Ham.) at different stocking densities with artificial dry pellet feeds. J. Anim. Sci., 68: 410-416.

32:  Talwar, P.K. and A.G. Jhingran, 1992. Inland Fisheries of India and Adjacent Countries. Balkema, Rotterdam, Pages: 308.

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved