Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Chemical and Nutritional Properties of Some Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties Grown in NWFP, Pakistan



Ikram Ullah, Muhammad Ali and Arifa Farooqi
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Grains of ten maize varieties grown in NWFP, Pakistan were obtained and investigated for physicochemical characteristics, proximate composition, energy content and mineral composition. Mean electrical conductivity and thousand seed mass were determined in the range of 9.26-33.83 μS and 319-230.4 g, respectively. Proximate composition shows moisture content in the range of 9.201-10.908%, ash (0.7-1.3%), fats (3.21-7.71%), protein (7.71-14.60%), crude fiber (0.80-2.32%) and carbohydrates (69.659-74.549%). The data indicate that seeds of these varieties vary greatly in term of protein, fats and crude fiber contents. Pahari, Jalal 2003, WD- 2*8 and Azam varieties were determined to contain high protein content (>10% protein) while WD-2*8, Pop. 2004B, PSEV 3-2 and Sarhad (W) contain high fats content of >6%. The energy value of the grains of these varieties was determined in the range of 307.047-394.066 kcal/100 g which shows that the grains of these varieties are rich source of energy. In minerals the level of sodium is 540.30-620.41ppm, K (2915-3471 ppm), Ca (410-590 ppm), Fe (38.02-56.14 ppm), Zn (37.05-52.4 ppm), Mg (985.2-1125.3 ppm) and Cu (11.02-14.25 ppm).

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Ikram Ullah, Muhammad Ali and Arifa Farooqi, 2010. Chemical and Nutritional Properties of Some Maize (Zea mays L.) Varieties Grown in NWFP, Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 9: 1113-1117.

DOI: 10.3923/pjn.2010.1113.1117

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjn.2010.1113.1117

REFERENCES
1:  AOAC, 1984. Official Methods of the Analysis of the ASSOC. 14th Edn., AOAC Inc., Arlington, Virginia, USA.

2:  Afzal, M., Z. Nazir, M.H. Bashir and B.S. Khan, 2009. Analysis of host plant resistance in some genotypes of maize against Chilo partellus (Swinhoe) (Pyralidae: Lepidoptera). Pak. J. Bot., 41: 421-428.
Direct Link  |  

3:  Aisha, S.M.F. and A.H. El-Tinay, 2004. Effect of genotype, malt pretreatment and cooking on in vitro protein digestibility and protein fractions of corn. Food Chem., 84: 613-619.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

4:  Ali, M., W. Ali, S. Ahmed and I. Ullah 2008. Mineral composition, quality and physicochemical parameters of the local tallow of Pakistan. Pak. J. Nutr., 7: 717-720.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

5:  AOAC, 1990. American Official Chemist Methods. AOAC, Washington DC, USA.

6:  Colak, A., O. Faiz and E. Sesli, 2009. Nutritional composition of some wild edible mushrooms. Turk. J. Biochem., 34: 25-31.

7:  Bogyo, T.P., E. Porceddu and P. Perrino, 1980. Analyses of sampling strategies for collecting genetic material. Econ. Bot., 34: 160-174.
Direct Link  |  

8:  Bruce, A. and L. Bergstrom, 1983. User requirement for food data bases and applications in nutritional research. Food Nutr. Bull., 5: 24-29.

9:  Carvalho, V.P., C.F. Ruas, J.M. Ferreira, R.M.P. Moreira and P.M. Ruas, 2004. Genetic diversity among maize (Zea mays L.) landraces assessed by RAPD markers. Genet. Mol. Biol., 27: 228-236.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

10:  Dorsey-Redding, C., C.R. Hurburgh, L.A. Johnson and S.R. Fox, 1990. Adjustment of maize quality data for moisture content. Cereal Chem., 67: 292-295.
Direct Link  |  

11:  Ejigue, J., L. Savoie, J. Marin and T. Desrosier, 2005. Benificial changes and drawbacks of traditional fermentation process on chemical composition and antinutritional factors of yellow maize (Zea mays). J. Biol. Sci., 5: 590-596.
Direct Link  |  

12:  Feil, B., S.B. Moser, S. Jampatong and P. Stamp, 2005. Mineral composition of the grains of tropical maize varieties as affected by pre-anthesis drought and rate of nitrogen fertilization. Crop Sci., 45: 516-523.
Direct Link  |  

13:  Hanlon, E.A., 1992. Determination of Potassium, Calcium and Magnesium in Plants by Atomic Absorption Techniques. In: Plant Analysis Reference Procedures for the Southern Region of the United States, Plank, C.O. (Ed.). University of Georgia, Athens, pp: 30-33.

14:  Hassan, A.B., G.A.M. Osman, A.H.R. Mohamed, M.E. Mohamed and E.E. Diab, 2009. Effect of gamma irradiation on the nutritional quality of maize cultivars (Zea mays) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) grains. Pak. J. Nutr., 8: 167-171.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

15:  Hussaini, M.A., V.B. Ogunlela, A.A. Ramalan and A.M. Falaki, 2008. Mineral composition of dry season maize (Zea mays L.) in response to varying levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and irrigation at Kadawa, Nigeria. World J. Agric. Sci., 4: 775-780.
Direct Link  |  

16:  Ijabadeniyi, A.O. and T.T. Adebolu, 2005. The effect of processing methods on the nutritional properties of ogi produced from three maize varieties. J. Food Agric. Environ., 3: 108-109.
Direct Link  |  

17:  Jayan, P.R. and V.J.F. Kumar, 2004. Planter design in relation to the physical properties of seeds. J. Trop. Agric., 42: 69-71.
Direct Link  |  

18:  Khan, A., M.T. Jan, K.B. Marwat and M. Arif, 2009. Organic and inorganic nitrogen treatments effects on plant and yield attributes of maize in a different tillage systems. Pak. J. Bot., 41: 99-108.
Direct Link  |  

19:  Ikhtiar, K. and Z. Alam, 2007. Nutritional composition of Pakistani wheat varieties. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B., 8: 555-559.
PubMed  |  

20:  Khan, S.M. and I.R. Kulachi, 2002. Assessment of post harvest wheat losses in D.I. Khan. Asian J. Plant Sci., 21: 103-106.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

21:  Kouakou, B., G. Albarin, O.A. Louise, D.N.D. Theodore, K. Youssouf and G. Dago, 2008. Assessment of some chemical and nutritional properties of maize, rice and millet grains and their weaning mushes. Pak. J. Nutr., 7: 721-725.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

22:  Maziya-Dixon, B.B., J.G. Kling and A.E. Okoruwa, 2000. Physical, chemical and water absorption characteristics of tropical maize hybrids. Afr. Crop Sci. J., 8: 419-828.
Direct Link  |  

23:  Munamava, M.R., A.S. Goggi and L. Pollak, 2004. Seed quality of maize inbred lines with different composition and genetic backgrounds. Crop Sci., 44: 542-548.
Direct Link  |  

24:  Niaz, I. and S. Dawar, 2009. Detection of seed borne mycoflora in maize (Zea mays L.). Pak. J. Bot., 41: 443-451.
Direct Link  |  

25:  Peplinski, A.J., M.R. Paulsen, R.A. Anderson and W.F. Kwolek, 1989. Physical, chemical and dry-milling characteristics of corn hybrids from various genotypes. J. Cereal Chem., 66: 117-120.

26:  Samir, T., A.W. Kraszewski and S.O. Nelson, 1998. Nondestructive microwave characterization for determining the bulk density and moisture content of shelled corn. Sci. Technol., 9: 1548-1556.
CrossRef  |  

27:  Woo, Y., D. Hu, B.A. Larkins and R. Jung, 2001. Genomics analysis of genes expressed in maize endosperm identifies novel seed proteins and clarifies patterns of zein gene expression. Plant Cell, 13: 2297-2318.
Direct Link  |  

28:  Zeb, A., Z. Ali, T. Ahmad and A. Abdumanon, 2006. Physicochemical characteristics of wheat varieties growing in the same and different ecological regions of Pakistan. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 9: 1823-1828.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2020 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved