• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Journal of Applied Sciences
  2. Vol 15 (2), 2015
  3. 240-247
  • Issues
    Online First Current Issue All Issues
  • Information About
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Applied Sciences

Year: 2015 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 240-247
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2015.240.247

Facebook Twitter Reddit Linkedin E-mail
Google Scholar ASCI
Research Article

Moderating Effect of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Cycle Time in the Telecom Industry

Turki Abdullah Alanazi
Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business,University Utara Malaysia, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia

Asmat Nizam Abdul Talib
Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business,University Utara Malaysia, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia

Hasbullah Ashari
Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business,University Utara Malaysia, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia

Rabiul Islam
School of Economics, Finance and Banking, College of Business, University Utara Malaysia, Kedah, 06010, Malaysia

The present study designated the impact of teamwork quality on New Product Development (NPD) cycle time through the moderated environmental turbulence in the telecommunication industry in Saudi Arabia. The aim of this study was to obtain the moderating effect of environmental turbulence on new product development cycle time in the telecom industry. Random sampling was used to select respondents for a survey. The PLS-SEM was used to analyze the direct and indirect relationships between teamwork quality, environmental turbulence and NPD cycle time while path coefficient and assessment of measurement and structural model used to test the research hypotheses. Findings indicated that environmental turbulence moderated the relationship between two factors of teamwork quality, namely, communication and coordination and NPD cycle time. Environmental turbulence did not moderate balance of member contribution, mutual support, effort and cohesion. The study also provides a theoretical understanding of how teamwork qualities drive new product development cycle time.
PDF Fulltext XML References Citation

How to cite this article

Turki Abdullah Alanazi, Asmat Nizam Abdul Talib, Hasbullah Ashari and Rabiul Islam, 2015. Moderating Effect of Environmental Turbulence on New Product Development Cycle Time in the Telecom Industry. Journal of Applied Sciences, 15: 240-247.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2015.240.247

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2015.240.247

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article Trend



Total views 2722

References


  1. Adler, P.S., 1995. Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organiz. Sci., 6: 147-167.
    Direct Link

  2. Aiken, L.H., S.P. Clarke, D.M. Sloane, J. Sochalski and J.H. Silber, 2002. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout and job dissatisfaction. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 288: 1987-1993.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  3. Augusto, M. and F. Coelho, 2009. Market orientation and new-to-the-world products: Exploring the moderating effects of innovativeness, competitive strength and environmental forces. Ind. Market. Manage., 38: 94-108.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Aziz, N.A. and N.M. Yasin, 2010. How will market orientation and external environmnet influence the performance among SMEs in the agri-food sector in Malaysia? Int. Bus. Res., 3: 154-164.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  5. Barney, J.B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manage., 17: 99-120.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  6. Beal, D.J., R.R. Cohen, M.J. Burke and C.L. McLendon, 2003. Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. J. Applied Psychol., 88: 989-1004.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  7. Chin, W., 1998. The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In: Modern Methods for Business Research, Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp: 295-336.

  8. Chin, W.W., B.L. Marcolin and P.R. Newsted, 2003. A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Inform. Syst. Res., 14: 189-217.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  9. Cohen, J., 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edn., Routledge, New Jersey, USA., ISBN: 9780203771587 Pages: 567.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  10. Cooke, R.A. and J.L. Szumal, 1994. The impact of group interaction styles on problem-solving effectiveness. J. Applied Behav. Sci., 30: 415-437.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Cooper, D.R. and P.S. Schindler, 2006. Business Research Methods. 9th Edn., McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780072979237, Pages: 744.

  12. Cooper, R.G. and E.J. Kleinschmidt, 1995. Benchmarking the firm's critical success factors in new product development. J. Prod. Innov. Manage., 12: 374-391.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  13. Dayan, M. and A. Basarir, 2010. Antecedents and consequences of team reflexivity in new product development projects. J. Bus. Ind. Market., 25: 18-29.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  14. Duncan, R.B., 1972. Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Admin. Sci. Quart., 17: 313-327.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  15. Easley, R.F., S. Devaraj and J.M. Crant, 2003. Relating collaborative technology use to teamwork quality and performance: An empirical analysis. J. Manage. Inform. Syst., 19: 247-265.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  16. Ebright, P.R., L. Urden, E. Patterson and B. Chalko, 2004. Themes surrounding novice nurse near-miss and adverse-event situations. J. Nurs. Admin., 34: 531-538.
    Direct Link

  17. Ehrhart, M.G. and S.E. Naumann, 2004. Organizational citizenship behavior in work groups: A group norms approach. J. Applied Psychol., 89: 960-974.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  18. Faraj, S. and L. Sproull, 2000. Coordinating expertise in software development teams. Manage. Sci., 46: 1554-1568.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  19. Garrett, D.K. and A.M. McDaniel, 2001. A new look at nurse burnout: The effects of environmental uncertainty and social climate. J. Nurs. Admin., 31: 91-96.
    Direct Link

  20. Gatignon, H. and J.M. Xuereb, 1997. Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. J. Market. Res., 34: 77-90.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Gresov, C., 1989. Exploring fit and misfit with multiple contingencies. Admin. Sci. Quart., 34: 431-453.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Griffin, A., 1993. Metrics for measuring product development cycle time. J. Prod. Innov. Manage., 10: 112-125.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  23. Griffin, A., 1997. PDMA research on new product development practices: Updating trends and benchmarking best practices. J. Prod. Innov. Manage., 14: 429-458.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  24. Gully, S.M., D.J. Devine and D.J. Whitney, 1995. A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Res., 26: 497-520.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  25. Hair, J.F., R.P. Bush and D.J. Ortinau, 2000. Marketing Research: A Practical Approach for the New Millennium. McGraw-Hill, New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780256195552, Pages: 682.
    Direct Link

  26. Han, J.K., N. Kim and R.K. Srivastava, 1998. Market orientation and organizational performance: Is innovation a missing link? J. Market., 62: 30-45.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  27. Hauptman, O. and K.K. Hirji, 1996. The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: An empirical study of cross-functional teams. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage., 43: 153-164.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  28. Hoegl, M. and H.G. Gemuenden, 2001. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: A theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organiz. Sci., 12: 435-449.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  29. Hoegl, M., K. Weinkauf and H.G. Gemuenden, 2004. Interteam coordination, project commitment and teamwork in multiteam R&D projects: A longitudinal study. Organiz. Sci., 15: 38-55.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  30. Hsu, J.S.C., S.P. Shih, J.C. Chiang and J.Y.C. Liu, 2012. The impact of transactive memory systems on IS development teams' coordination, communication and performance. Int. J. Project Manage., 30: 329-340.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  31. Jaworski, B.J. and A.K. Kohli, 1993. Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences. J. Market., 57: 53-70.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  32. Kirca, A.H., S. Jayachandran and W.O. Bearden, 2005. Market orientation: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedents and impact on performance. J. Market., 69: 24-41.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  33. Kumar, N., J.D. Hibbard and L.W. Stern, 1994. The nature and consequences of marketing channel intermediary commitment. Working Paper of Marketing Science Institute, Cambridge, MA., USA., pp: 94-115.

  34. Li, T. and R.J. Calantone, 1998. The impact of market knowledge competence on new product advantage: Conceptualization and empirical examination. J. Market., 62: 13-29.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  35. Lings, I.N. and G.E. Greenley, 2005. Measuring internal market orientation. J. Ser. Res., 7: 290-305.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  36. Moorman, C. and A.S. Miner, 1998. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Acad. Manage. Rev., 23: 698-723.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  37. Mullen, B. and C. Copper, 1994. The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. Psychol. Bull., 115: 210-227.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  38. Ringle, C.M., S. Wende and S. Will, 2005. SmartPLS 2.0 β. University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

  39. Schweitzer, F.M., O. Gassmann and K. Gaubinger, 2011. Open innovation and its effectiveness to embrace turbulent environments. Int. J. Innov. Manage., 15: 1191-1208.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  40. Seers, A., 1989. Team-member exchange quality: A new construct for role-making research. Organiz. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 43: 118-135.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  41. Song, X.M. and M.E. Parry, 1997. A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. J. Market., 61: 1-18.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  42. Su, Z.F., E. Xie and J.H. Peng, 2010. Impacts of environmental uncertainty and firm's capabilities on R&D investment: Evidence from China. Innov. Manage. Policy Pract., 12: 269-282.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  43. Tillman, H.J., J. Salyer, M.C. Corley and B.A. Mark, 1997. Environmental turbulence: Staff nurse perspectives. J. Nurs. Admin., 27: 15-22.
    Direct Link

  44. Weingart, L.R., 1992. Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort and planning on group performance. J. Applied Psychol., 77: 682-693.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  45. Weiss, A.M. and J.B. Heide, 1993. The nature of organizational search in high technology markets. J. Market. Res., 30: 220-233.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  46. Wernerfelt, B., 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Manage. J., 5: 171-180.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  47. Agarwal, R. and E. Karahanna, 2000. Time flies when you're having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quart., 24: 665-694.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  48. Carron, A.V., W.N. Widmeyer and L.R. Brawley, 1985. The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: The group environment questionnaire. J. Sport Psychol., 7: 244-266.
    Direct Link

  49. Wixom, B.H. and H.J. Watson, 2001. An empirical investigation of the factors affecting data warehousing success. MIS Quart., 25: 17-41.
    CrossRefDirect Link

Keywords


  • telecom industry
  • Environmental turbulence
  • new product
  • development

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved