Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Research Article

Selenium to Improve Growth Characters, Photosynthetic Pigments and Essential Oil Composition of Chives Varieties

Asian Journal of Crop Science: Volume 9 (3): 92-99, 2017

Khalid Ali Khalid, Heba Mostafa Amer, Hend Elsayed Wahba, Saber Fayez Hendawy and Tamer Mohamed Abd El-Razik


Background and Objective: Chives (Allium schoenoprasum) has various medical uses and biological activities such as antioxidant and antimicrobial. Selenium (Se) plays an important role in some physiological process in higher plants. The aim of this study was to evaluate vegetative growth characters (VGC) {plant height {PH} (cm/plant), fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) as g/plant}, photosynthetic pigments (PHP) {chlorophyll (Chl) a, Chl b and total carotenoids (TC)} and essential oil (EO) composition of two chives varieties under Se treatments. Materials and Methods: Two varieties of chives {A. schoenoprasum Moskurl 2 Petra (M2P) and A. schoenoprasum Moskurl 2 KRA USA (M2K)} were exposed to different doses of Se (control, 3, 6, 9 and 12 mg L–1) as foliar spray. Randomized Complete block design (RCBD) was used and the averages of data were statistically analyzed using two-way ANOVA. Results: Six mg L–1 (Se) x M2K variety resulted in the greatest values (41.0, 55.6 and 9.6) of VGC. The highest accumulations of Chl a and TC (1.9 and 0.6) were obtained from M2P and M2K varieties treated with 12 mg L–1 (Se) while M2K plants x 6, 9 and 12 mg L–1 (Se) produced the highest amounts (0.3) of Chl b. 6 mg L–1 (Se) treatment reported the greatest amounts of the contents of EO which recorded the values of 0.6 mL/(100 plant), 192 mL/(feddan) and 480 mL ha–1. The major constituents of EO (dipropyl trisulfide, 1-propenyl propyl disulfide, dipropyl disulfide, methyl propyl disulfide and methyl propyl trisulfide) were changed (increased or decreased) or not changed under Se, chives varieties and their interactions. Conclusion: It may be concluded that treated chives varieties with Se doses improved the VGC and EO while PHP and major constituents of EO were changed. Under Se treatments the M2K variety produced higher values of VGC and EO content than M2P while no differences were found in PHP. Different variations were obtained in the major constituents of EO of both varieties under Se applications.

How to cite this article:

© 2017. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Khalid Ali Khalid, Heba Mostafa Amer, Hend Elsayed Wahba, Saber Fayez Hendawy and Tamer Mohamed Abd El-Razik, 2017. Selenium to Improve Growth Characters, Photosynthetic Pigments and Essential Oil Composition of Chives Varieties. Asian Journal of Crop Science, 9: 92-99.

DOI: 10.3923/ajcs.2017.92.99

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajcs.2017.92.99


Chives or Allium schoenoprasum (A. schoenoprasum) belongs to family Alliaceae, it is widely distributed in Europe, Asia and North America regions1. It is known for medicinal properties2-7. The essential oil (EO) of A. schoenoprasum contains sulfur constituents which have antimicrobial and antioxidant activities8.

Selenium (Se) is an essential element for human, animal and some kinds of microorganisms. Add Se directly to food as food additive not reported by US Food and Drug Administration9. So Se can be used in plant nutrition through the soil or as foliar spray that resulted in the accumulation of Se in plant production. Although, Se is not confirmed to be required by higher plants, many investigations indicted that at low doses it plays a necessary role in antioxidative reactions and hormone balance in plant cell such as increasing the activity of glutathione peroxidase (GPX)10-12. The GPX roles connected with elevated environmental stress resistance such as salinity and drought stresses13.

Se treatments caused a significant improvement in vegetative growth characters (VGC) and photosynthetic pigments (PHP) accumulation of cucumber, alfalfa and peanut plants14-17. It was found that VGC of cucumber were increased in the 2 mg L–1 (Se) level and reduced at the higher level of Se while chlorophyll (Chl) composition and PHP values were not influenced18.

Se is an important nutrient required for EO production of aromatic plants19. Se doses (2-8 mg L–1) caused a highly significant increase in EO extracted from the herb of basil and lemon balm plants20. About 0.3 mg (Se) produced the greatest amount of EO and monoterpenes in geranium herb19. Khalid21 investigated the response of salvia EO to Se treatments (2-8 mg L–1) and it was reported that the highest values of major components (α-thujone, β-thujone and camphor) were recorded in the rate of 8 mg L–1, mono and sesquiterpenes were decreased however ketones increased as Se rate increase.

Genotypes of medicinal and aromatic plants play an essential role in medicinal and aromatic plants production systems. They affect growth and productivity by their better yield potentials, resistance against insect pest and diseases under different environmental factors22. Enhance yield, active principals and development cultivars of medicinal and aromatic plants is necessary. Producing varieties having resistance against environmental factors can increase yields and productivity of medicinal and aromatic plants to meet world requirement23.

Growth, yield and active constituents of medicinal and aromatic plants genotypes depend on genetic and environmental factors. Therefore the present study aimed to investigate the possible effects of Se levels on the VGC, EO and PHP of two varieties of chives plant.


Experimental: Experiments were carried out in arid region at the Experimental Farm of SEKEM Company which located in Belbes city, Egypt, during two successive seasons, 2013-2014 and 2014-2015 {the field experiments were carried out twice during two seasons (18 months) because repeated the experiments lead to reduce the experimental errors and produce comprehensive results}. The chemical analysis, identifications of EO major components and statistical analysis (STA) took more than 1 year. Physical and chemical properties of the soil used in this study were determined according to Margenot et al.24 and Carter and Gregorich25 which are: Sand (98.8%), silt (0.9%), clay (0.8%), pH (8.2), EC (2.3 dSm–1) and OM (0.1%). Anions and cations (mq L–1): SO42– (10.0), Cl1– (10.9), HCO31– (2.4), Na+ (2.3), Mg2+ (3.8), Ca2+ (0.8) and K+ (0.9). Seeds of A. schoenoprasum, which were provided by the Pharmasate Company, Germany. Seeds were sown directly in the nursery in the third week of October during both seasons. After 4 weeks from the sowing, the seedlings were transplanted into open field. The experimental design was a randomized complete block (RCBD) with 3 replicates. The experimental area (plot) was 4 m2 (2 m×2 m) containing 4 rows, the distance between hills was 25 and 50 cm apart. Thinning for three plants/hill was made 45 days after cultivating the plants in the open field. All agriculture practices operations other than experimental treatments were performed according to the recommendations of the Ministry of Agriculture, Egypt. Plots were divided into two main groups. The first group: A. schoenoprasum var. Moskurl 2 Petra (M2P) plants were subjected to different levels of Se as foliar spray: Control, 3, 6, 9 and 12 mg L–1. The second group was subjected to the same Se levels but A. schoenoprasum var. Moskurl 2 KRA USA (M2K) plants were used. The source of Se was sodium selenate (Na2SeO4). The plants were treated by foliar spray twice, the first one was after 2 weeks from transplanting and the second one was after one week from the first one.

Harvesting: At vegetative stage, leaves were harvested by cutting the leaves 3 cm above the soil surface. Plant height (PH) (cm/plant), as well as fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) as g/plant were recorded.

Determination of PHP: Chl a, Chl b and total carotenoids (TC) in fresh leaves collected at the first and second seasons of each treatment were determined as mg g–1 using the methods described by the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists26.

EO isolation: Fresh leaves (aerial part) was collected from each treatment during both seasons, air dried and weighed to extract the EO, then 100 g from each replicate of all treatments was subjected to hydro-distillation (HD) for 3 h using a Clevenger-type apparatus27. The EO content was calculated as a relative percentage (v/w). In addition, total EO as mL/(100 plant), mL/(feddan) (4200 m2) and mL ha–1 was calculated by using the DW. The EOs extracted from A. schoenoprasum varieties were collected in both seasons from each treatment and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate to identify the chemical constituents.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS): The GC-MS analysis was carried out with an Agilent 5975 GC-MSD system. The DB-5 column (60 m×0.25, 0.25 mm film thickness) was used with helium as carrier gas (0.8 mL min–1). The GC oven temperature was kept at 60°C for 10 min and programmed to 220°C at a rate of 4°C min–1 that was kept constant at 220°C for 10 min and followed by elevating the temperature to 240°C at a rate of 1°C min–1. Split ratio was adjusted at 40:1. The injector temperature was set at 250°C. Mass spectra were recorded at 70 eV. Mass range was m/z 35-450.

GC analysis: The GC analysis was carried out using an Agilent 6890N GC system using FID detector temperature of 300°C. To obtain the same elution order with GC-MS, simultaneous auto injection was done on a duplicate of the same column at the same operational conditions. Relative percentage amounts of the separated compounds were calculated from FID chromatograms.

Identification of components: Identification of the EO components was carried out by comparison of their relative retention times with those of authentic samples or by comparison of their retention index (RI) to series of n-alkanes. Computer matching against commercial {Wiley GC/MS Library, Mass Finder 3 Library}28,29 and inhouse "Başer Library of EO Constituents" built up by genuine compounds and components of known oils. Additionally, MS literature data30,31 were also used for the identification.

Statistical analysis: In this experiment, 2 factors were considered: Se levels (control, 3.0, 6.0, 9.0 and 12.0 mg L–1) and two A. schoenoprasum varieties. For each treatment there were 3 replicates. The experimental design followed a randomized complete block design (RCBD). According to De Smith32 the averages of data of both seasons were statistically analyzed using two way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Significant values were determined according to p-values (p<0.05 = Significant, p<0.01 = Moderate significant and p<0.001 = Highly significant). The applications of that technique were according to the STAT-ITCF program33.


Effect of Se, chives varieties and their interactions on VGC: The varieties of chives (M2P and M2K) and Se levels affected plant morphology (Table 1). Thus the VGC {PH (cm/plant), FW (g/plant) and DW (g/plant)} in general were increased in Se levels with or without the various varieties of chives. The greatest values (41, 55.6 and 9.6) of VGC were reported under the treatment of 6 mg L–1 (Se) x M2K variety. Regarding the varieties factor, it was found that M2K gave higher values of VGC (36.1, 44.3 and 7.6) than M2P (31, 27.9 and 4.8). The STA indicated that the increases in various VGC were highly significant (p<0.001) for Se or chives varieties while Se x various varieties caused insignificant increases in VGC.

Effect of Se, chives varieties and their interactions on PHP: Chives varieties and applying Se resulted in different changes in the accumulation of PHP {Chl a, Chl b and TC} (Table 2). The highest accumulations of Chl a and TC were recorded with the treatment of 12 mg L–1 (Se) with the values of 1.9 and 0.6 for both M2P and M2K varieties, respectively. The greatest amounts of Chl b (0.3 mg g–1) were obtained from the M2P plants treated with 3 and 6 mg L–1 (Se) or M2K plants that received 6, 9 and 12 mg L–1 (Se). ANOVA reported that the changes in PHP were significant (p<0.05) for Se treatments while it was insignificant for varieties or Se x various varieties.

Effect of Se, chives varieties and their interactions on EO contents: The effects of Se, varieties of chives and Se x various varieties on EO content {mL/(100 plant), mL/(feddan) and mL ha–1} are presented in Table 3. Different increases were found in EO contents of Se treatments compared with control except the treatment of 12 mg L–1 (Se) which caused no changes in EO extracted from M2P.

Table 1:Effect of Se, chives varieties and their interactions on VGC
***Highly significant, NS: Non-significant, M2P: Moskurl 2 Petra, M2K: Moskurl 2 KRA USA, VGC: Vegetative growth characters, PH: Plant height, FW: Fresh weight, DW: Dry weight, values are given as Mean±SD

Table 2:Effect of Se, chives varieties and their interactions on PHP
*Significant, NS: Non-significant, M2P: Moskurl 2 Petra, M2K: Moskurl 2 KRA USA, Chl: Chlorophyll, TC: Total carotenoids, values are given as Mean±SD

The highest EO contents were obtained from M2K plants that treated with 6 mg L–1 (Se) with the values of 0.6 mL/(100 plant), 192 mL/(feddan) and 480 mL ha–1. The M2P plants produced lower accumulations of EO {0.4 mL/(100 Plant), 128 mL/(Feddan) and 320 mL ha–1} than M2K {0.5 mL/(100 plant), 160 mL/(Feddan) and 400 mL ha–1}. The increments in EO contents were highly significant (p<0.001) for Se, chives varieties and Se x various varieties.

Table 3:Effect of Se, chives varieties and their interactions on EO contents
***Highly significant, NS: Non-significant, M2P: Moskurl 2 Petra, M2K: Moskurl 2 KRA USA, EO: Essential oil, Values are given as Mean±SD

Table 4:Effect of Se, chives varieties and their interactions on EO major constituents
A: Dipropyl trisulfide, B: 1-propenyl propyl disulfide, C: Dipropyl disulfide, D: Methyl propyl disulfide, E: Methyl propyl trisulfide, M2P: Moskurl 2 Petra, M2K: Moskurl 2 KRA USA, TI: Total identified, EO: Essential oil

Effect of Se, chives varieties and their interactions on the major constituents of EO: Five constituents were detected by GC/MS analysis in EO isolated from two varieties of chives leaves (Table 4), accounting 46.3-93.5% of total constituents. The major constituents were dipropyl trisulfide, 1-propenyl propyl disulfide, dipropyl disulfide, methyl propyl disulfide and methyl propyl trisulfide. Varieties of chives, Se doses and varieties of chives x Se doses resulted in different changes in EO major constituents. The highest amounts of 1-propenyl propyl disulfide and methyl propyl disulfide were detected with the control treatment in EO extracted from M2P plants with the values of 10 and 7.1%. Treatments of 3 and 6 mg L–1 (Se) caused the greatest accumulation of dipropyl disulfide, methyl propyl trisulfide and dipropyl trisulfide in EO isolated from M2K plants which recorded the values of 23.2, 15.5 and 34.3%, respectively. EO of M2K plants resulted in the highest values of dipropyl trisulfide (25.4%), 1-propenyl propyl disulfide (7.3%), methyl propyl disulfide (4.5%) and methyl propyl trisulfide (10.2%) while the greatest value of dipropyl disulfide (41.1%) were recorded with M2P plants.


Different variations were found in VGC, PHP and EO composition when the varieties of A. schoenoprasum plants (M2P and M2K) subjected to various levels of Se. Improving the VGC under Se treatments may be due to Se can increase the plant PHP especially Chl content, respiration rates in leaves, glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity in mitochondria and dry matter content which suggested by some investigators34-40. Regarding the changes in PHP some previous investigators supported these results, they indicted that PHP such as Chl and TC affected by Se levels and low levels of Se can increase the PHP14,41-43. On the other hand Se can affect the PHP by increase the uptake of some nutrients such as magnesium (Mg) in leaves which led to increasing in PHP18. Opposite trends were found in PHP under Se treatments i.e., PHP including Chl, TC and xanthophylls were reduced in the leaves of coffee, Phaseolus vulgaris L. and Sinapis alba L. under Se doses44-47. The increases in EO content in response to Se treatments may be due to the Se can increase the secondary products in aromatic plants especially EO19. Se has a significant effect CO2 assimilation level, PHP content and ultimately the accumulation of EO (quantity and quality) isolated from geranium19. Obtained results are in accordance with those obtained by Lee et al.20, they revealed that Se caused an increase in basil and lemon balm EO from two to three folds compared with control. The changes in sulfur components (EO constituents) under Se conditions may be due to its effect of Se on enzymes activity and metabolism improvement48. Sulfur components are known for medicinal and biological activities such as anticancer and antiproliferative activities as well as antimicrobial (having effects against different bacteria, fungi and yeasts)49,50. The changes in VGC, PHP and EO (contents and major components) of different A. schoenoprasum varieties under Se conditions may be due to the genetic variations between the various varieties51. It may be concluded that the type of nutrient (Se) and plant variety in the production system should be considered in the growth, yield and EO composition produced from aromatic plants.


It can be reported that the VGC and EO of Chives varieties were increased under Se treatments while the PHP and major constituents of EO (dipropyl trisulfide, 1-propenyl propyl disulfide, dipropyl disulfide, methyl propyl disulfide and methyl propyl trisulfide) were changed. The highest values of VGC were reported under the treatment of 6 mg L–1 (Se) x M2K Varity. The treatments of 3, 6 and 12 mg L–1 (Se) produced the highest values of PHP in both varieties. The greatest values of EO contents were recorded with M2K plants x 6 mg L–1 (Se). Control, 3 and 6 mg L–1 (Se) resulted in the highest amounts of EO major constituents for both varieties.


This study discovered that a cultivation of A. schoenoprasum plant is required. Treatments of Se improved the VGC, EO contents and PHP of both A. schoenoprasum varieties. The application of Se resulted in different changes in the major constituents of EO extracted from A. schoenoprasum. This study help the farmers, ministry of agriculture and pharmaceutical companies to improve yield and chemical contents of A. schoenoprasum (important medicinal and aromatic crop) as a natural source of drugs and pharmaceutical industries.


AOAC., 2016. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 20th Edn., AOAC International, Washington, DC., USA., ISBN-13: 9780935584875, Pages: 3172.

Adams, R.P., 2007. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry. 4th Edn., Allured Publishing Co., Carol Stream, IL., USA., ISBN-13: 9781932633214, Pages: 804.

Amin, M. and B.P. Kapadnis, 2005. Heat stable antimicrobial activity of Allium ascalonicum against bacteria and fungi. Indian J. Exp. Biol., 43: 751-754.
PubMedDirect Link

Bernaert, N., D. de Paepe, C. Bouten, H. de Clercq and D. Stewart et al., 2012. Antioxidant capacity, total phenolic and ascorbate content as a function of the genetic diversity of leek (Allium ampeloprasum var. porrum). Food Chem., 134: 669-677.
CrossRefDirect Link

Breznik, B., M. Germ, A. Gaberscik and I. Kreft, 2005. Combined effects of elevated UV-B radiation and the addition of selenium on common (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) and tartary [Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.] buckwheat. Photosynthetica, 43: 583-589.
CrossRefDirect Link

Burbott, A.J. and W.D. Loomis, 1969. Evidence for metabolic turnover of monoterpenes in peppermint. Plant Physiol., 44: 173-179.
Direct Link

Carter, M.R. and E.G. Gregorich, 2008. Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. 2nd Edn., CRC Press, Boca Ratan, FL., USA., ISBN-13: 9780849335860, Pages: 144.

Cartes, P., A.A. Jara, L. Pinilla, A. Rosas and M.L. Mora, 2010. Selenium improves the antioxidant ability against aluminium-induced oxidative stress in ryegrass roots. Ann. Applied Biol., 156: 297-307.
CrossRefDirect Link

Chamheidar, H. and K. Parvanak, 2014. Investigation of selenium fertilizer different rates on uptake of selenium in alfalfa plant. WALIA J., 30: 1-3.

Cincotta, F., A. Verzera, G. Tripodi and C. Condurso, 2015. Determination of sesquiterpenes in wines by HS-SPME coupled with GC-MS. Chromatography, 2: 410-421.
CrossRefDirect Link

Clevenger, J.F., 1928. Apparatus for the determination of volatile oil. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc., 17: 345-349.
CrossRefDirect Link

Csiszar, J., M. Szabo, L. Erdei, L. Marton, F. Horvath and I. Tari, 2004. Auxin autotrophic tobacco callus tissues resist oxidative stress: The importance of glutathione S-transferase and glutathione peroxidase activities in auxin heterotrophic and autotrophic calli. J. Plant Physiol., 161: 691-699.
CrossRefDirect Link

De Smith, M.J., 2015. STATSREF: Statistical Analysis Handbook-A Web-Based Statistics Resource. The Winchelsea Press, Winchelsea, UK.

Djanaguiraman, M., D.D. Devi, A.K. Shanker, A., Sheeba and U. Bangarusamy, 2005. Selenium-an antioxidative protectant in soybean during senescence. Plant Soil, 272: 77-86.
CrossRefDirect Link

ESO., 2006. The complete database of essential oils. Boelens Aroma Chemical Information Service, Leffingwell and Associates, USA.

El-Beltagy, A.S. and M.M. Soliman, 1993. Effect of growth regulators on rates of recovery water logged tomato plants. Egypt. J. Hort. Sci., 12: 155-162.

Emam, M.M., H.E. Khattab, N.M. Helal and A.E. Deraz, 2014. Effect of selenium and silicon on yield quality of rice plant grown under drought stress. Aust. J. Crop Sci., 8: 596-605.
Direct Link

Fargasova, A., J. Pastierova and K. Svetkova, 2006. Effect of Se-metal pair combinations (Cd, Zn, Cu, Pb) on photosynthetic pigments production and metal accumulation in Sinapis alba L. seedlings. Plant Soil Environ., 52: 8-15.
Direct Link

Filek, M., R. Keskinen, H. Hartikainen, I. Szarejko, A. Janiak, Z. Miszalski and A. Golda, 2008. The protective role of selenium in rape seedlings subjected to cadmium stress. J. Plant Physiol., 165: 833-844.
CrossRefDirect Link

Finley, J.W., A. Sigrid-Keck, R.J. Robbins and K.J. Hintze, 2005. Selenium enrichment of broccoli: Interactions between selenium and secondary plant compounds. J. Nutr., 135: 1236-1238.
Direct Link

Fista, G.A., J.G. Bloukas and A.S. Siomos, 2004. Effect of leek and onion on processing and quality characteristics of Greek traditional sausages. Meat Sci., 68: 163-172.
CrossRefDirect Link

Germ, M. and J. Osvald, 2005. Selenium treatment affected respiratory potential in Eruca sativa. Acta Agric. Slov., 85: 329-335.
Direct Link

Haghighi, M., A. Sheibanirad and M. Pessarakli, 2016. Effects of selenium as a beneficial element on growth and photosynthetic attributes of greenhouse cucumber. J. Plant Nutr., 39: 1493-1498.
CrossRefDirect Link

Hashemi, A., A. Abdolzadeh and H.R. Sadeghipour, 2010. Beneficial effects of silicon nutrition in alleviating salinity stress in hydroponically grown canola, Brassica napus L., plants. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 56: 244-253.
CrossRefDirect Link

Hawrylak-Nowak, B., 2009. Beneficial effects of exogenous selenium in cucumber seedlings subjected to salt stress. Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 32: 259-269.
CrossRefDirect Link

Hussain, S., T. Fujii, S. McGoey, M. Yamada, M. Ramzan and M. Akmal, 2014. Evaluation of different rice varieties for growth and yield characteristics. J. Anim. Plant Sci., 24: 1504-1510.
Direct Link

Irmak, S., 2017. Effects of selenium application on plant growth and some quality parameters in peanut (Arachis hypogaea). Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 20: 92-99.
CrossRefDirect Link

Jain, M. and R. Gadre, 1998. Inhibition of chlorophyll synthesis and enzymes of nitrogen assimilation by selenite in excised maize leaf segments during greening. Water Air Soil Pollut., 104: 161-166.
CrossRefDirect Link

Jozwiak, W., M. Mleczek and B. Politycka, 2016. The effect of exogenous selenium on the growth and photosynthetic pigments content of cucumber seedlings. Fresenius Environ. Bull., 25: 142-152.

Kafi, M. and Z. Rahimi, 2010. Salinity effects on germination properties of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) Iran. J. Field Crop Res., 8: 615-621.

Khalid, K.A., 2011. Evaluation of Salvia officinalis L. essential oil under selenium treatments. J. Essent. Oil Res., 23: 57-60.
CrossRefDirect Link

Khush, G.S., 2005. What it will take to feed 5.0 billion rice consumers in 2030. Plant Mol. Biol., 59: 1-6.

Kumari, S., S. Pundhir, P. Priya, G. Jeena and A. Punetha et al., 2014. EssOilDB: A database of essential oils reflecting terpene composition and variability in the plant kingdom. Database, Vol. 2014. 10.1093/database/bau120

Lee, M.J., G.P. Lee and K.W. Park, 2001. Status of selenium contents and effect of selenium treatment on essential oil contents in several Korean herbs. Korean J. Hort. Sci. Technol., 19: 384-388.

Leelarungrayub, N., V. Rattanapanone, N. Chanarat and J.M. Gebicki, 2006. Quantitative evaluation of the antioxidant properties of garlic and shallot preparations. Nutrition, 22: 266-274.
CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

Lefsrud, M.G., D.A. Kopsell, D.E. Kopsell and W.M. Randle, 2006. Kale carotenoids are unaffected by, whereas biomass production, elemental concentrations and selenium accumulation respond to, changes in selenium fertility. J. Agric. Food Chem., 54: 1764-1771.
CrossRefDirect Link

Liang, Y., Q. Shen, Z. Shen and T. Ma, 1996. Effects of silicon on salinity tolerance of two barley cultivars. J. Plant Nutr., 19: 173-183.
CrossRefDirect Link

Mahboubi, M. and N. Kazempour, 2014. Chemical composition, antioxidant and antimicrobial activity of Allium hirtifolium essential oil. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. Food Sci., 3: 402-405.
Direct Link

Margenot, A.J., F.J. Calderon, K.W. Goyne, F.N.D. Mukome and S.J. Parikh, 2017. IR Spectroscopy, Soil Analysis Applications. In: Encyclopedia of Spectroscopy and Spectrometry, Lindon, J., G. Tranter and D. Koppenaal (Eds.). 3rd Edn., Oxford Academic Press, UK., pp: 448-454.

Mazzafera, P., 1998. Growth and biochemical alterations in coffee due to selenite toxicity. Plant Soil, 201: 189-196.
CrossRefDirect Link

Misra, A., A.K. Srivastava, N.K. Srivastava and A. Khan, 2010. Se-acquisition and reactive oxygen species role in growth, photosynthesis, photosynthetic pigments and biochemical changes in essential oil(s) monoterpene of geranium (Pelargonium graveolens L.Her.' Ex. Ait.). Int. J. Applied Biol. Pharmaceut. Technol., 1: 473-485.
Direct Link

Padmaja, K., D.D. Prasad and A.R. Prasad, 1990. Selenium as a novel regulator of porphyrin biosynthesis in germinating seedlings of mung bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Int. J. Biochem., 22: 441-446.

Rattanachaikunsopon, P. and P. Phumkhachorn, 2009. Shallot (Allium ascalonicum L.) oil: Diallyl sulfide content and antimicrobial activity against food-borne pathogenic bacteria. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 3: 747-750.
Direct Link

Slusarenko, A.J., A. Patel and D. Portz, 2008. Control of plant diseases by natural products: Allicin from garlic as a case study. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 121: 313-322.
CrossRefDirect Link

Smrkolj, P., M. Germ, I. Kreft and V. Stibilj, 2006. Respiratory potential and Se compounds in pea (Pisum sativum L.) plants grown from Se-enriched seeds. J. Exp. Bot., 57: 3595-3600.
CrossRefDirect Link

Stajner, D., M. Milic-DeMarino and J. Canadanovic-Brunet, 2003. Screening for antioxidant properties of leeks, Allium sphaerocephalon L. J. Herbs Spices Med. Plants, 10: 75-82.
CrossRefDirect Link

StatSoft, 2007. Statistica version 7.1. StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK., USA.

Tardiff, B. and P. Morisset, 1990. Clinal morphological variation of Allium schœnoprasum in Eastern North America. Taxon, 39: 417-429.
CrossRefDirect Link

Valkama, E., M. Kivimaenpaa, H. Hartikainen and A. Wulff, 2003. The combined effects of enhanced UV-B radiation and selenium on growth, chlorophyll fluorescence and ultrastructure in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) and barley (Hordeum vulgare) treated in the field. Agric. For. Meteorol., 120: 267-278.
CrossRefDirect Link

Xue, T., H. Hartikainen and V. Piironen, 2001. Antioxidative and growth-promoting effect of selenium on senescing lettuce. Plant Soil, 237: 55-61.
CrossRefDirect Link

Yabuki, Y., Y. Mukaida, Y. Saito, K. Oshima and T. Takahashi et al., 2010. Characterisation of volatile sulphur-containing compounds generated in crushed leaves of Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum Rottler). Food Chem., 120: 343-348.
CrossRefDirect Link