
Research Article


Rapid Screening of Various Factors Influencing Polysaccharides Production by Microchlorophyte Alga, Chlorella vulgaris, by Application of PlackettBurman Design: Characterization of Polysaccharides Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography 

Noura ElAhmady ElNaggar,
Mervat H. Hussein,
Sami A. ShaabanDessuuki
and
Shimaa R. Dalal



ABSTRACT

Background: Due to high nutritional value, natural pigments and antioxidant activity, Chlorella vulgaris is used as a health food, feed supplement, as well as in the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industry. It contains polysaccharides, proteins, lipids, antioxidants, vitamins, carotenoids, immunostimulator compounds and minerals. A statistical approach has been employed for which a PlackettBurman design is used for identifying significant variables influencing polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris. Materials and Methods: Ten different independent variables including mannitol, sodium acetate, potassium citrate, NaNO_{3}, K_{2}HPO_{4}, MgSO_{4}, CaCl_{2}.2H_{2}O, Na_{2}CO_{3}, inoculum size and inoculum age were screened by PlackettBurman experiment and High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) was used to characterize the compounds in Chlorella vulgaris polysaccharides. Results: Among the variables screened, mannitol, sodium acetate and inoculum age had significant effects on polysaccharides production. The HPLC chromatograms indicated that Chlorella vulgaris extract contain fructose, glucose, maltose and lactose with concentration of 13.259, 283.027, 26.387 and 25.489 mg g^{–1} dry weight, respectively. Conclusion: The results indicate that this alga contains high amount of glucose which can use in different applications.




How
to cite this article:
Noura ElAhmady ElNaggar, Mervat H. Hussein, Sami A. ShaabanDessuuki and Shimaa R. Dalal, 2016. Rapid Screening of Various Factors Influencing Polysaccharides Production by Microchlorophyte Alga, Chlorella vulgaris, by Application of PlackettBurman Design: Characterization of Polysaccharides Using High Performance Liquid Chromatography. Journal of Applied Sciences, 16: 429437. DOI: 10.3923/jas.2016.429.437 URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2016.429.437



Received: May 24, 2016;
Accepted: July 15, 2016;
Published: April 29, 2019


INTRODUCTION
Microalgae are considered as some of the most economically promising organism in our world^{1}. They have drown increased attention from researchers in recent years because they provide lipids for biofuel production, as well as numerous highvalue bioproducts such as omega3 fatty acids^{2}, health food, carotenoids and animal feed^{3}. Chlorella is the most cultivated eukaryotic green microalga, as it is widely used as a health food and feed supplement, as well as in the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industry^{4}. Chlorella vulgaris contains 45% protein (w/w, dry basis), 20% fat, 20% carbohydrates, 5% fiber and 10% minerals and vitamins. The growth of algae is a function of many factors, including nutrients, pH, salinity, temperature and light^{5}.
Polysaccharides are biopolymers of simple sugars (monosaccharides) linked together by glycosidic bonds and they have numerous commercial applications in products such as stabilisers, thickeners, emulsifiers, food, feed and beverages etc.^{6,7}. Algal polysaccharides posses biological activities as antitumor, antivirus, antihyperlipidemia and anticoagulant have been found to be associated with polysaccharides in some species of seaweed which have been purified and developed as a new generation of drugs^{8,9}. Studies are widely conducted on isolation, purification and structural analysis of polysaccharides^{10, 11}. Several reports have indicated that chemical components and molecular weight of seaweed polysaccharides are among the major important factors responsible for biological activities^{12}.
A statistical approach has been employed in the present study for which a PlackettBurman design is used for identifying significant variables influencing polysaccharides production by freshwater algae Chlorella vulgaris. Also high performance liquid chromatography was used to characterize the compounds in Chlorella vulgaris polysaccharides.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Algal strain isolation, identification and culture conditions: Fresh water Chlorella vulgaris was isolated from water sample from river Nile. Culture purification was according to Andersen^{13} and the alga was identified according to Philipose^{14}. Chlorella vulgaris was grown in axenic cultures at 25±2°C under continuous illumination 3600 lux in 500 mL conical flasks, containing 200 mL BG11 medium^{15} for 12 days incubation period.
Extraction of polysaccharides: The hot water method of Wang et al.^{16} at 70°C for 4 h was followed.
Determination of polysaccharides: The polysaccharide was determined by the phenolsulfuric acid reaction using glucose as standard^{17,18}. Screening of main factors influences polysaccharides production by PlackettBurman design: In order to determine the major factors affecting polysaccharides production, different variables were evaluated using PlackettBurman statistical experimental design which is a 2 factorial design that identifies the critical variables required for elevated polysaccharides production and is very useful for screening the most important factors with respect to their main effects^{19,20}. PlackettBurman statistical design is a wellestablished and suitable for complicated systems with multiple variables to screen out and select most significant environmental and nutritional variables. Compared with other medium design strategies, the PlackettBurman design is simple, fast method for screening large number of variables in one experiment to see which gives the best results and is often used to evaluate the important variables affecting culture requirements for polysaccharides production. The total number of experiments to be carried out according to PlackettBurman is n+1 where, n is the number of variables^{21}. A total of 10 independent (assigned) and one unassigned variables (commonly referred as dummy variable) were screened in PlackettBurman experimental design. Dummy variables (D) are used to estimate experimental errors in data analysis. Table 1 shows the 11 different independent variables including mannitol, sodium acetate, potassium citrate, NaNO_{3}, K_{2}HPO_{4}, MgSO_{4}, CaCl_{2}.2H_{2}O, Na_{2}CO_{3}, inoculum size and inoculum age which chosen to be screened by PlackettBurman experiment. Each variable is represented at 2 levels high and low denoted by (+) and (), respectively. The experiment was conducted in 12 runs to study the effect of the selected variables on the production of polysaccharides.
Table 1:  Experimental independent variables at 2 levels used for the production of polysaccharides by Chlorella vulgaris using PlackettBurman design 

All trials were performed in duplicate and the average of polysaccharides production were treated as responses. PlackettBurman experimental design is based on the first order model:
where, Y is the response or dependent variable (polysaccharides production), it will always be the variable we aim to predict, β_{0} is the model intercept and β_{i }is the linear coefficient and X_{i }is the level of the independent variable, it is the variable that will help us explain polysaccharides production. This model does not describe interaction among factors and it is used to screen and evaluate the important factors that influence the response. Statistical analysis: Minitab 14.0 (Minitab Inc., Pennsylvania, USA) was used for the experimental designs. Design Expert^{®} 7.0 software version 7 (Statease Inc., USA) for windows was used for the statistical analysis for the obtained experimental data. The pvalues were used as a tool to check the significance of the interaction effects, which in turn may indicate the patterns of the interactions among the variables^{22}. The quality of fit of regression model was expressed via the correlation coefficient (R), the coefficient of determination (R^{2}) and the adjusted R^{2} and its statistical significance was determined by an Ftest.
Hydrolysis of the algal polysaccharide: Algal polysaccharides were hydrolyzed in 2 mol L^{–1} trifluoroacetic acid for 10 h at 100°C in a sealed glass tube under nitrogen flow. The residual acid was removed under a stream of N_{2} in a 4045°C waterbath after adding methanol and taking to dryness 3 times and then distilled water (1 mL) was added to dissolve the residue. High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) refractive index detector: Monosaccharides analysis in the extracts of the decomposed alga was performed with HPLC (Agilent 1100 HPLC system) using an Hypersil ASP2 column (4.6×250 mm) with a mobile phase of acetonitrilewater (80:20) a flow rate of 1 mL min^{–1}. The temperature of column was set at 40°C. The injection volume of mixed monosaccharide standards and samples hydrolyzates was 10 μL of the final extract. Standards and quantification of monosaccharides: Identification of the monosaccharides in the hydrolyzates of samples were carried out by comparing their retention times obtained for the authentic standards for six monosaccharides (xylose, fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose and lactose) in mobile phase which analyzed individually and mixed in concentration of 10 mg mL^{–1} under the same HPLC conditions.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Statistical screening of various factors influencing extracellular polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris using PlackettBurman design: The influence of 11 medium factors and conditions namely mannitol, sodium acetate, potassium citrate, NaNO_{3}, K_{2}HPO_{4}, MgSO_{4}, CaCl_{2}.2H_{2}O, Na_{2}CO_{3}, inoculum size and inoculum age was investigated in 12 runs using PlackettBurman design. The PlackettBurman design for the 12 runs and the corresponding response for polysaccharides production are shown in Table 2. The polysaccharides production varied markedly with the variables tested in range of 2.30384.040 in the 12 trials, this variation reflects the importance of medium optimization to attain higher polysaccharides production. The maximum polysaccharides production (84.040 mg g^{–1} cell dry weight) was achieved in the run number 8, when minimal levels of mannitol, NaNO_{3}, MgSO_{4}, CaCl_{2}.2H_{2}O, Na_{2}CO_{3} and maximal levels of sodium acetate, potassium citrate, K_{2}HPO_{4}, inoculum size and inoculum age were used while the lowest polysaccharides production (2.303 mg g^{–1} cell dry weight) was observed in the run number 7 when NaNO_{3}, K_{2}HPO_{4}, MgSO_{4}, Na_{2}CO_{3}, inoculum size were adjusted to the highest levels and mannitol, sodium acetate, potassium citrate, CaCl_{2}.2H_{2}O and inoculum age were adjusted to the lowest levels.
Statistical analysis of PlackettBurman design for polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris: PlackettBurman design was used to determine which variables significantly affect polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris. The relationship between a set of independent variables and the response (Y) is determined by a mathematical model called multipleregression model. Statistical analysis of polysaccharides production was performed which is represented in Table 3 and 4. Table 3 and Fig. 1 shows the main effect of each variable on the polysaccharides production which estimated based on the difference between the average measurement calculated at the higher (+1) and lower (1) levels of the constituent.
Table 2:  Twelve trial PlackettBurman experimental design for evaluation of independent variables with coded values along with the observed polysaccharides production 

“1": Correspond to the minimum value and "+1": Correspond to the maximum value of the input parameter range 
Table 3:  Regression coefficients, estimated effect and percentage of contribution for polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris using PlackettBurman design 


Fig. 1: 
Effect of independent variables on polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris using PlackettBurman design (Red color represent the most significant positive independent variables affecting enzyme production) 
A large main effect either positive or negative indicates that a factor has a large impact on polysaccharides production, while an effect close to zero means that a factor has little or no effect.
Table 4: 
Regression statistics and analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the experimental results of PlackettBurman design used for polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris 

*Significant values, SS: Sum of squares, MS: Mean square, F: Fishers’s function, pvalue: Level of significance, PRESS: Predicted residual sum of squares, CV%: Coefficient of variation% and df: Degree of freedom 
The percentages contributions of the variables are given in Table 3. The results revealed that mannitol, sodium acetate and inoculum age are the most contributing components with 15.63, 21.92 and 14.85%, respectively. The effects of the examined variables on polysaccharides production using the PlackettBurman design were calculated and summarized in Table 3. The data revealed that, Na_{2}CO_{3} (H) is insignificant variables with lower effect (2.3) and lower percent of contribution (1.930). Lower percentage of contribution indicated higher pvalue (0.414). Thus instead of starting with the maximum model effects, backward regression at alpha 0.15 was applied to remove/or eliminate the small effects of Na_{2}CO_{3} (H). Then, the model fitted for the test of significance. Actually, the removal procedure ends when the model was at significant level. Pareto chart allows detecting the order and significant effects of variables affecting polysaccharides production in PlackettBurman experimental design. It displays the absolute values of the effects and draws a reference line on the chart. Any effect that extends past this reference line is potentially important. Pareto chart in design expert version 7.0 reproduce the relation between tvalue (effect) vs., ranks. Pareto chart (Fig. 2) showed that sodium acetate (B) was the most significant variable affecting polysaccharides production followed by mannitol (A) and inoculum age (K). The analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the experimental design was calculated and the sum of square, mean square, Fvalue, tvalue, pvalue and confidence level are given in Table 4. The significance of the model was calculated by the pvalue. The pvalue is the probability which serves as a tool for checking the significance of each of the parameter. The model Fvalue of 49.62 implies that the model is significant. There is only a 1.99% chance that a "Model Fvalue" this large could occur due to noise. Values of "Prob>F" (pvalue) less than 0.05 indicate model terms are significant. In this case A, B, C, D, F and K are significant model terms. Values greater than 0.1 indicate the model terms are not significant. If there are many insignificant model terms. The data revealed that, 9 variables (mannitol, sodium acetate, potassium citrate, NaNO_{3}, MgSO_{4} and inoculum age) were found to significantly affect polysaccharides production while the remaining five variables (K_{2}HPO_{4}, CaCl_{2}.2H_{2}O, Na_{2}CO_{3} and inoculum size) have not significant influence on the polysaccharides production (Table 4). In this connection the analysis showed that, sodium acetate (B) with a probability value of 0.0063 was determined to be the most significant factor affecting polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris at 99.37% confidence followed by mannitol (A) (pvalue = 0.0123), inoculum age (K) (pvalue = 98.64), the lower probability values indicate the more significant factors affecting polysaccharides production. Also, it was clear that the three variables exerted a positive effect on polysaccharides production which means that the increase in the concentrations of mannitol, sodium acetate and inoculum age could exert positive effect on polysaccharides production. The R^{2} values provide a measure of how much variability in the observed response values can be explained by the experimental factors. The R^{2} value is always between 0 and 1. When R^{2} is closer to the 1, the stronger the model is and the better it predicts the response^{23}. The value of the determination coefficient (R^{2}) was found to be 0.996 indicates that 99.6% of the variability in the polysaccharides production could be explained by the model independent variables and only 0.4% of the total variations are not explained by the independent variables.

Fig. 2: 
Pareto chart illustrates the order and significance of the variables affecting polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris using PlackettBurman design (blue colors represent negative effects and orange color represent positive effects) 
The adjusted R^{2} (0.9755) is also very high that indicates that the model is very significant^{24}. The "Pred Rsquared" of 0.8395 is in reasonable agreement with the "Adj Rsquared" of 0.9755. This indicated a good adjustment between the observed and predicted values. "Adeq precision" measures the signal to noise ratio. A ratio greater than 4 is desirable. The ratio of 24.601 indicates an adequate signal.
The coefficient of variation percentage (CV%) is a measure of residual variation of the data relative to the size of the mean. Usually, the higher the value of CV, the lower is the reliability of experiment. Here a lower value of CV (6.510%) indicates a greater reliability of the experimental performance. The predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS) is a measure of how well the model fits each point in the design. The smaller the PRESS statistic, the better the model fits the data points. The value of PRESS is 902.919. The model shows standard deviation and mean value of 3.541 and 54.398, respectively (Table 4). To approach the neighborhood of the optimum polysaccharides production, the coefficients of regression equation were calculated using design expert version 0.7 and the data (Table 4) was fitted to a first order polynomial equation. By neglecting the insignificant terms, the following regression equation in terms of coded factors was obtained:
where, Y is the response (polysaccharides production) and A, B, C, D, F and K are mannitol, sodium acetate, potassium citrate, NaNO_{3}, MgSO_{4} and inoculum age, respectively. The coefficient of each variable represents the effect extent of these variables on polysaccharides production.

Fig. 3: 
BoxCox plot of model transformations 
Model adequacy checking: BoxCox plot provides guideline for selecting the correct power law transformation to further improve the model. As observed from Fig. 3, the blue line indicates the current transformation (Lambda = 1) and the green line indicates the best lambda value (Lambda = 1), while the red lines indicate the minimum and maximum 95% confidence interval values (0.47 and 2.27, respectively). Therefore, the model needs no transformation, as current value of confidence interval (λ = 1) is very close to model design value (best = 1.03) and the model is in the optimal zone since the blue line falls within the red lines. So that the model is well fit to the experimental data obtained and well satisfies the assumptions of the analysis of variance. The normal probability plot of the residuals is an important diagnostic tool to detect and explain the systematic departures from the normality^{22}. Figure 4 shows a plot of normal probability of the experimental results. The normal probability plot is a graphical technique for assessing whether or not a data set is approximately normally distributed. The residual was plotted against a theoretical normal distribution of the model in such a way that the points should form an approximate straight line for polysaccharides production. Departures from this straight line indicate departures from normality. A linear pattern demonstrated that the errors are normally distributed and are independent of each other. The normal probability plot of the residuals shows the points close to a diagonal line; therefore, the residuals appear to be approximately normally distributed. This indicates that the model was well fitted with the experimental results.
Many algal organisms are capable of using either metabolism process (autotrophic or heterotrophic) for growth, meaning that they are able to photosynthesize as well as ingest prey or organic materials^{25}.

Fig. 4: 
Normal probability plot of residuals to check for normality of residuals for polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris determined by the first order polynomial equation 
Although, most microalgae are photoautotrophs, some microalgae can use organic carbon substances as the sources of energy and carbon for cell growth. Mixotrophy is growth in which organic carbon is assimilated in the light simultaneously with carbon dioxide fixation. The ability of microalgae to use organic carbon as an energy source is important because it can minimize the inhibitory effects of seasonal and diurnal light limitation on growth in outdoor cultures. A considerable number of algae, for example Chlorella^{26} can grow mixotrophically and heterotrophically in the presence of organic matter such as carbohydrates and acetate. Mixotrophic culture of C. vulgaris integrates some advantages of heterotrophic and phototrophic configurations^{27}, while overcoming the difficulties associated with these two types of cultures^{28}. The benefits are associated with a significant increase in growth rate and productivity due to high organic carbon incorporation with in cell, particularly in the formation of metabolites such as lipids, polysaccharides and proteins^{29}. This is particularly important, as increases of up to 5 times have been reported compared with autotrophic cultures of microalgae^{30}. Another advantage of mixotrophic cultures is the use of light, which induces and regulates the production of high value macromolecules such as pigments^{31} and fatty acids^{32}.

Fig. 5(ab): 
(a) HPLC chromatograms of standard monosaccharides (Xylose, fructose, glucose, sucrose, maltose and lactose), and (b) HPLC chromatograms of the extract of Chlorella vulgaris, xaxis: Retention times (min), yaxis: Observed peak area (nRIU: Intensity of refraction index signals) 
It is true that acetate can be used as a carbon source via acetyl CoA, which can then be changed to pyruvate and further, oxidised in the metabolic pathway. Sodium acetate could promote both growth and lipid accumulation in many microalgae such as Phaeodactylum tricornutum^{33}, Brachiomonas submarina^{34 } and Chlorella vulgaris^{35}, while Scenedesmus sp. AARL G022^{36} seemed unaffected by sodium acetate supplement.
Yee^{37}was found that sodium acetate and sugar alcohol mannitol were potential carbon sources for mixotrophic culture growth enhancement of M. griffithii. Supplementation of culture medium with these carbon sources resulted in approximately 11.5 fold increase in final cell density compared to control in a small scale culture. In a larger scale mixotrophic culture with aeration, 0.05% mannitol resulted in a decent 11.5 fold increase in final cell density, approximately 2 fold increase in growth rate. In terms of biomass, mannitol resulted in approximately 0.5 fold increase compared to control. Supplementation of culture medium with 0.05% mannitol resulted in a final dry biomass weight of 497.4 mg L^{–1} which is higher than for Chlorella sp. The Y8 supplemented with 0.1% fructose, which produced approximately 300 mg L^{–1} dry biomass^{38}. A slight decrease in total oil content was observed in cells grown in mannitol (11.87%) compared to control (13.8%)^{38}.
It was also found that the age of a parent culture used as a source of inoculum may exert a very pronounced effect on the rates of photosynthesis and respiration in cells of the daughtercultures for several days, the age of inoculum is important to achieve optimum growth of algae. Inoculum age of 10 days was found to be the most suitable conditions for maximum production of polysaccharides production by Chlorella vulgaris may be because cells are in the logarithmic or earlyexponential growth phase and the cells are more active under the used growth conditions.
High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC): The HPLC chromatograms (Fig. 5) indicated that Chlorella vulgaris extract contain fructose, glucose, maltose and lactose with concentration of 13.259, 283.027, 26.387 and 25.489 mg g^{–1} dry weight, respectively (Table 5).
Table 5:  Composition of the polysaccharides isolated from extract of Chlorella vulgaris (mg g^{–1} sample) 

The results indicate that this alga contains high amount of glucose which can use in different applications such as bioethanol production. Polysaccharides in general and sulphated exopolysaccharides in particular are released by many species of microalgae for example, Chlorella stigmatophora the main component is glucose and xylose^{39} and contain sulphated polysaccharide type, Chlorella spp., contain soluble polysaccharide^{40}. The polysaccharides from microalgae serve as antiviral agents, health foods, antioxidants, they have antiinflammatory properties and have a role in the immunomodulatory system and they may also be used as lubricants for bone joints or even as dragreducing substances for ships^{41}.
CONCLUSION
In this study, polysaccharides production by microalgae Chlorella vulgaris was investigated. A PlackettBurman design is used for identifying significant variables influencing polysaccharides production process by microalgae Chlorella vulgaris. The results showed that among the variables screened, mannitol, sodium acetate and inoculum age had significant effects on polysaccharides production. Also high performance liquid chromatography was used to characterize the compounds in Chlorella vulgaris polysaccharides which indicated that Chlorella vulgaris extract contain fructose, glucose, maltose and lactose with concentration of 13.259, 283.027, 26.387 and 25.489 mg g^{–1} dry weight, respectively.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt, for their financial support.

REFERENCES 
1: Pittman, J.K., A.P. Dean and O. Osundeko, 2011. The potential of sustainable algal biofuel production using wastewater resources. Bioresour. Technol., 102: 1725. CrossRef  Direct Link 
2: Larsdotter, K., 2006. Wastewater treatment with microalgaea literature review. Vatten, 62: 3138. Direct Link 
3: Becker, E.W., 1988. MicroAlgae for Human and Animal Consumption. In: Microalgal Biotechnology, Borowitzka, M.A. and L.J. Borowitzka (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, London, pp: 222256.
4: 2012. Effects of culture conditions on growth and biochemical profile of Chlorella vulgaris. J. Plant Pathol. Microbiol., Vol. 3. CrossRef 
5: Belasco, W., 1997. Algae burgers for a hungry world? The rise and fall of chlorella cuisine. Technol. Cult., 38: 608634. Direct Link 
6: Tseng, C.K., 2001. Algal biotechnology industries and research activities in China. J. Applied Phycol., 13: 375380. CrossRef  Direct Link 
7: Bixler, H.J. and H. Porse, 2010. A decade of change in the seaweed hydrocolloids industry. J. Applied Phycol., 23: 321335. CrossRef  Direct Link 
8: Schaeffer, D.J. and V.S. Krylov, 2000. AntiHIV activity of extracts and compounds from algae and cyanobacteria. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 45: 208227. CrossRef  PubMed  Direct Link 
9: Trento, F., F. Cattaneo, R. Pescador, R. Porta and L. Ferro, 2001. Antithrombin activity of an algal polysaccharide. Thrombosis Res., 102: 457465. CrossRef  Direct Link 
10: Girod, S., P. BaldetDupy, H. Maillols and J.M. Devoisselle, 2002. Online direct determination of the second virial coefficient of a natural polysaccharide using sizeexclusion chromatography and multiangle laser light scattering. J. Chromatogr. A, 943: 147152. CrossRef  Direct Link 
11: Maksimova, I.V., L.B. Bratkovskaia and S.E. Plekhanov, 2004. [Extracellular carbohydrates and polysaccharides of the algae Chlorella pyrenoidosa Chick S39]. Izv Akad. Nauk. Ser. Biol., 2: 217224, (In Russian). PubMed  Direct Link 
12: Wang, Y., M. Zhang, D. Ruan, A.S. Shashkov, M. Kilcoyne, A.V. Savage and L. Zhang, 2004. Chemical components and molecular mass of six polysaccharides isolated from the sclerotium of Poria cocos. Carbohydr. Res., 339: 327334. CrossRef  Direct Link 
13: Andersen, R.A., 2005. Algal Culturing Techniques. Academic Press, USA., ISBN: 9780120884261, Pages: 578.
14: Philipose, M.T., 1967. Chlorococcales. Vol. 8, Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India, pp: 3141.
15: Rippka, R., J. Deruelles, J.B. Waterbury, M. Herdman and R.Y. Stanier, 1979. Generic assignments, strain histories and properties of pure cultures of cyanobacteria. J. Gen. Microbiol., 111: 161. CrossRef  Direct Link 
16: Wang, H., Q. Wang, S.C. Wang, Z.T. Wang and J.F. Shen, 2006. [Extraction, isolation and structure identification of polysaccharide in root of Salvia miltiorrhiza]. China J. Chin. Mater. Med., 31: 10751077. PubMed  Direct Link 
17: DuBois, M., K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers and F. Smith, 1956. Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Anal. Chem., 28: 350356. CrossRef  Direct Link 
18: Cuesta, G., N. Suarez, M.I. Bessio, F. Ferreira and H. Massaldi, 2003. Quantitative determination of pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide serotype 14 using a modification of phenolsulfuric acid method. J. Microbiol. Meth., 52: 6973. CrossRef  Direct Link 
19: Krishnan, S., S.G. Prapulla, D. Rajalakshmi, M.C. Misra and N.G. Karanth, 1998. Screening and selection of media components for lactic acid production using PlackettBurman design. Bioprocess Eng., 19: 6165. CrossRef 
20: ElNaggar, N.E.A., 2015. Extracellular production of the oncolytic enzyme, Lasparaginase, by newly isolated Streptomyces sp. strain NEAE95 as potential microbial cell factories: Optimization of culture conditions using response surface methodology. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol., 16: 162178. Direct Link 
21: Plackett, R.L. and J.P. Burman, 1946. The design of optimum multifactorial experiments. Biometrika, 33: 305325. Direct Link 
22: Montgomery, D.C., 2005. Design and Analysis of Experiments: Response Surface Methods and Designs. Vol. 210, John Wiley and Sons, New Jersey, pp: 56.
23: Kaushik, R., S. Saran, J. Isar and R.K. Saxena, 2006. Statistical optimization of medium components and growth conditions by response surface methodology to enhance lipase production by Aspergillus carneus. J. Mol. Catal. B: Enzym., 40: 121126. CrossRef  Direct Link 
24: Akhnazarova, S. and V. Kafarov, 1982. Experiment Optimization in Chemistry and Chemical Engineering. Mir Publication, Moscow.
25: Zhang, X.W., Y.M. Zhang and F. Chen, 1999. Application of mathematical models to the determination optimal glucose concentration and light intensity for mixotrophic culture of Spirulina platensis. Process Biochem., 34: 477481. CrossRef  Direct Link 
26: Endo, H., H. Sansawa and K. Nakajima, 1977. Studies on Chlorella regularis, heterotrophic fastgrowing strain II. Mixotrophic growth in relation to light intensity and acetate concentration. Plant Cell Physiol., 18: 199205. Direct Link 
27: Lee, Y.K., 2001. Microalgal mass culture systems and methods: Their limitation and potential. J. Applied Phycol., 13: 307315. CrossRef  Direct Link 
28: Lee, Y.K., S.Y. Ding, C.H. Hoe and C.S. Low, 1996. Mixotrophic growth of Chlorella sorokiniana in outdoor enclosed photobioreactor. J. Applied Phycol., 8: 163169. CrossRef  Direct Link 
29: Richmond, A., 1986. Microalgae of Economic Potential. In: CRC Handbook of Micro Algal Mass Culture, Richmond, A. (Ed.). CRC Press, Bica Raton, Florida, USA, pp: 199224.
30: Syrett, P.J., S.M. Bocks and M.J. Merrett, 1964. The assimilation of acetate by Chlorella vulgaris. J. Exp. Bot., 15: 3547. CrossRef  Direct Link 
31: Lee, Y. and D. Zhang, 1999. Production of Astaxanthin by Haematococcus. In: Chemicals from Microalgae, Cohen, Z. (Ed.). CRC Press, New York, ISBN: 9780748405152, pp: 173190.
32: Li, X., H. Xu and Q. Wu, 2007. Largescale biodiesel production from microalga Chlorella protothecoides through heterotrophic cultivation in bioreactors. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 98: 764771. CrossRef  Direct Link 
33: Wang, H., R. Fu and G. Pei, 2012. A study on lipid production of the mixotrophic microalgae Phaeodactylum tricornutum on various carbon sources. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 6: 10411047. Direct Link 
34: Yang, X., X. Zeng, Y. Ji and Q. Liu, 2003. Effects of sodium nitrate and sodium acetate concentrations on the growth and fatty acid composition of Brachiomonas submarina. J. Ocean Univ. Qingdao, 2: 7578. Direct Link 
35: HerediaArroyo, T., W. Wei, R. Ruan and B. Hu, 2011. Mixotrophic cultivation of Chlorella vulgaris and its potential application for the oil accumulation from nonsugar materials. Biomass Bioenergy, 35: 22452253. CrossRef  Direct Link 
36: Dittamart, D., C. Pumas, J. Pekkoh and Y. Peerapornpisal, 2014. Effects of organic carbon source and lightdark period on growth and lipid accumulation of Scenedesmus sp. AARL G022. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol., 8: 198206. Direct Link 
37: Yee, W., 2015. Feasibility of various carbon sources and plant materials in enhancing the growth and biomass productivity of the freshwater microalgae Monoraphidium griffithii NS16. Bioresour. Technol., 196: 18. CrossRef  PubMed  Direct Link 
38: Lin, T.S. and J.Y. Wu, 2015. Effect of carbon sources on growth and lipid accumulation of newly isolated microalgae cultured under mixotrophic condition. Bioresour. Technol., 184: 100107. CrossRef  Direct Link 
39: Guzman, S., A. Gato, M. Lamela, M. FreireGarabal and J.M. Calleja, 2003. Antiinflammatory and immunomodulatory activities of polysaccharide from Chlorella stigmatophora and Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Phytother. Res., 17: 665670. CrossRef  PubMed  Direct Link 
40: Sun, Y. and C. Wang, 2009. The optimal growth conditions for the biomass production of Isochrysis galbana and the effects that phosphorus, Zn^{2+}, CO_{2} and light intensity have on the biochemical composition of Isochrysis galbana and the activity of extracellular CA. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 14: 225231. CrossRef  Direct Link 
41: Raposo, M.F.D.J., R.M.S.C. de Morais and A.M.M.B. de Morais, 2013. Bioactivity and applications of sulphated polysaccharides from marine microalgae. Mar. Drugs, 11: 233252. CrossRef  Direct Link 



