• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences
  2. Vol 6 (2), 2012
  3. 85-91
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Asian Journal of Animal Sciences

Year: 2012 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 85-91
DOI: 10.3923/ajas.2012.85.91

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Article Trend



Total views 90

Authors


S.S.A. Egena

Country: Nigeria

A.T. Ijaiya

Country: Nigeria

R. Kolawole

Country: Nigeria

Keywords


  • Administrative zones
  • indigenous Nigerian chicken
  • spur
  • spur gene
Research Article

Comparative Evaluation of Spurred and Spurless Male and Female Indigenous Nigerian Chicken in the Three Administrative Zones of Niger State

S.S.A. Egena, A.T. Ijaiya and R. Kolawole
The study was carried out using 750 indigenous Nigerian chickens comprising 543 males and 207 females brought to the market by farmers for sale in the three administrative zones of Niger state, Nigeria. Parameters measured were Body Weight (BW), Body Length (BL), Body Girth (BG), Wing Length (WL), Shank Length (SL) and Shank Thickness (ST). Results revealed that there’s a great preponderance of spurred (sI) indigenous Nigerian chickens in Niger state. The gene frequencies of spurred (sI) and spurless (SI+/-) gene in the three administrative zones of Niger State were as follows; zone A: (males, 0.93 vs. 0.07 and females, 0.69 vs. 0.31); zone B: (males, 0.93 vs. 0.07 and females, 0.74 vs. 0.26) and zone C: (males, 0.92 vs. 0.08 and females, 0.87 vs. 0.13), respectively. Spur gene significantly (p<0.05) imparted on all the metric parameters evaluated in the three zones except for BG and SL in zone B which were not significantly (p>0.05) affected by the presence of the gene. Birds from zone C (males and females) performed better than those from the other zones in all the parameters measured. They had better BW (2.28; 1.98), BL (44.79; 41.47), BG (26.41; 25.24), WL (24.83; 23.79), SL (12.04; 11.00) and ST (1.30; 1.20), respectively. Results from the combined analysis showed that spurred females were better than the spurless males in BW, BG, WL and ST. It was concluded that the presence of spur in the local chickens conferred some advantages on the birds’ exhibiting the trait as they performed better than the ones not having it.
PDF Fulltext XML References Citation

How to cite this article

S.S.A. Egena, A.T. Ijaiya and R. Kolawole, 2012. Comparative Evaluation of Spurred and Spurless Male and Female Indigenous Nigerian Chicken in the Three Administrative Zones of Niger State. Asian Journal of Animal Sciences, 6: 85-91.

DOI: 10.3923/ajas.2012.85.91

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajas.2012.85.91

Related Articles

The Issue of Feed-Food Competition and Chicken Production for the Demands of Foods of Animal Origin

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved