INTRODUCTION
Fish landing and distribution in Bangladesh is in complex condition due to
the involvement of many stakeholders in the distributional channel. Typical
distribution path is rather complex, although shorter distribution lines have
also been seen due to establishment of big production zones and affluent outlets
who have been found to deal among themselves comfortably. Generally, wet fishes
reach to the consumers through commission agents to wholesalers to the retailers.
Several negotiators are involved in this distributional channel to collect fish
from the fishermen/fish farmers and make a linkage path between fishermen/farmers
and wholesalers (Mahajon) or commission agents. Again, wet fish can enters the
secondary or tertiary markets where it passes through more than one commission
agent. Both commission agents and wholesaler locally known as “Mahajons”
play principal roles in fish distribution (Nowsad, 2010).
Fish landing centers are the places where different types of fresh fish and
fisheries items are hoarded from different sources like river, beel, gher, pond,
estuaries and sea. The harvested fishes are transferred from the landing centers
to the consumer markets via different distributional channels (Ali
et al., 2004). Fish landing centers play a vital role in quick and
smooth disposal of fresh fish as well the quality of fishery products. Fish
are transferred to different parts of the country and also to the other countries
through landing centers. The peoples involved in different tires of fish distribution
channel are also very important, those have been playing a very vital role in
supply of quality fish in the country. The marine fish catching areas and landing
centers of Bangladesh are located in the South and South-eastern parts of Bangladesh
and freshwater fish are landed in river sides, haor areas, beels and Kaptai
lake. The North-west part of Bangladesh e.g., Dinajpur, Rangpur, Rajshahi, area
lack such catching area and landing centers which results frequent fish scarcity
in those zone (Mansur, 2005). It is therefore important
to know the distribution paths of the fish which influence the quality, supply
and price of the products.
Delays in distribution and landing of fresh fish result qualitative losses.
Some fish is landed at or near to the place where it is to be sold, for example
close by a major city and in that case quality loss is not a major concern.
In artisanal fishing, much fish is landed in distant or remote places. The fisheries
items may be rotten while it is being taken to market, this unexpected delay
of transportation results loss of quality. Studies shows about 28% fish were
found to lose 60-70% of freshness quality before it reached the consumer in
local fish markets (Nowsad, 2005, 2006).
The landing centers and markets in Bangladesh leaves room for much improvement
since huge problems exist to improve the distribution. Fish markets are totally
insufficient in relation to fish quality and public health.
The linkage between producers and consumers is term as marketing which is operated
through a set of mediators performing useful commercial functions in a chain
(Nayeem et al., 2010). In most countries, marketing
system is operated by the private sector and there is little incentive in the
private sector to improve the marketing chain. Reza et
al. (2005) reported that in Bangladesh, fish and fishery products are
marketed through many different channels and outlets. The fish market structure
varies from area to area, but in general terms it can be four types viz. primary,
secondary, higher secondary and final consuming markets (Kleih
et al., 2001). The marketing of fish, fresh water and marine, needs
considerable time to reach landing centers and markets which cause the loss
of biofactors and sometimes make fish inedible (BCAS, 2003;
Nowsad, 2004).
Due to high population growth there is an ever ending gap between supply and
demand of fish and fishery products in Bangladesh. The government of Bangladesh
combined with NGOs is trying to increase the fish production by taking many
steps and programme. But lessening the gap requires increasing production and
also the improvement in all aspects of marketing and distribution (ICLARM,
1991). Little steps have been taken to improve fish marketing system which
is the major part of fisheries sector.
Keeping the views in mind, it is important to elucidate a complete figure on
the nature of landing centers and distribution pathways, markets and major stakes
in the country for recommending policies for smooth distribution of quality
fish throughout each corner of the country. The present study was designed to
know the distribution pathways of fish, types and nature of stakeholders involved
in fish distribution chain and to recommend policies for uniform availability,
adequate quality and smooth distribution of fish and fisheries products throughout
the country.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The present study was conducted for a period of 16 months from February 2011
to May 2012 to obtain data on wet fish landing and distribution throughout the
entire country.
Collection of data: The study was based on collection of primary and
secondary data. Before collecting the primary data, a draft questionnaire was
developed which was pre-tested with a few Upazilla Fisheries Officers (UFOs).
In the pre-testing, much attention was given to any new information in the draft
questionnaire in order to reach the objectives of the study. According to the
experience gained in pre-testing, the final questionnaire was improved, rearranged
and modified. The final questionnaire included the questions on the stakeholder
numbers and role, features of fish landing centers and markets, sources and
destinations of fish, problems related to fish markets and landing centers etc.
The questionnaires were sent to all UFOs of the country through postal mail
attaching with return tickets and address. After filling the questionnaire they
sent it back to us. A set of instructions were given with the questionnaire
to help the UFOs to give the exact answers. An exploratory study was also conducted
by rapid rural appraisal involved the fish farmers and fishers, aratdars, wholesalers,
traders and retailers of different fish landing and market sites to collect
information on fish distribution, marketing and fish transportation with constraints
and coping strategies. The data were verified through concerned District Fisheries
Officers (DFOs) and Upazilla Fisheries Officers (UFOs) through telephone interview.
The validated information based on their knowledge, experience, skills and observations
were cross-checked through secondary information pool of GO/NGO bodies, like
DoF (Department of Fisheries) annual reports, BBS (Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics),
fisheries week souvenirs etc. For further validation and double checking significant
number of landing centers and markets were visited to collect and verify data
through participatory appraisals.
Data analysis: After data collection, the data were processed and edited
for analysis. The collected data were scrutinized and summarized carefully before
the actual tabulation. After completing the data collection, processed data
were transferred to a preliminary data sheet of a computer and compare with
computer spread sheets of MS Excel to ensure the accuracy of the data entry.
After data entry, all the collected information were accumulated and analyzed
by MS-Excel and then presented in textual, tabular and graphical forms.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
In the present study the landing and distribution of wet fish throughout the
country were studied emphasizing on fish landing and market facilities, fish
distribution channel and stakeholders in the distribution chain with problems
faced by the stakes related to fish landing and marketing.
Fish Landing centers, markets and stakeholders: The number of the fish
landing centers in Dhaka, Rajshahi, Khulna, Rangpur, Chittagong, Barishal and
Sylhet division were 50, 16, 12, 2, 76, 65 and 16, respectively (Table
1). The number of landing centers was high in Chittagong division. It is
obvious because, out of the seven divisions discussed Chittagong is blessed
with huge capture and culture fisheries specially for marine fishery. The great
Kaptai lake fishery is situated in Chittagong division. Because of its position
in the coastal belt, fish were landed here and there anywhere suitable along
the seashore and river shore. Many shrimp and prawn hatcheries are also built
in this division. So all marine catches and cultured shrimp were landed in this
division and distributed to the main city and market of the other adjacent districts
as well as to the capital and northern and north-western districts of the country.
On the other hand, the term ‘landing center’ was often merged with
wholesale markets (Ahmed and Rahman, 2005). Landing
centre receives fish from different harvesting sources, while wholesale fish
markets either initiate the distribution of landed fish or receive daily delivery
of fish distributed from other zones. In southern coastal zone and middle part
of the country, particularly in the divisions like Chittagong, Khulna, Barishal
and Dhaka, wholesale fish markets tend to be side by side with landing spots.
But in Northern areas, like the division of Rajshahi and Rangpur much of the
fish traded come from the South and Middle part and the wholesale markets are
independent of local small scale landing. Therefore, the number of landing centers
is less in Rangpur division.
On the other hand, a total of 5440 fish markets were detected from these divisions.
Highest number of 2099 fish markets was identified in Dhaka division.
| Table 1: |
No. of fish landing centers, markets and stakeholders |
 |
The number of market in Dhaka division was higher because of huge number consumers
in and around the capital and adjacent districts that govern fish markets along
with high profitability of fish.
Beside the fishers and farmers, stakeholders in fish distribution were categorized
into three groups in this study viz. arotdar, paiker and retailer. The total
number of arotdar, paiker and retailer, as recorded by the UFOs, were found
to be 6219, 39506 and 122922, respectively. Many researchers categorized stakeholders
in fish value chain differently, but their role in market structure was found
to be almost similar all over the country. Rahman et
al. (2009) found four types of stakeholders in the market of Khulna
as local traders, agents/suppliers, wholesalers and retailers. Islam
et al. (2006) also found similar type of stakeholders that correspond
well with present study.
Aratdar is a person who deals fish business, invests money for fishing, conducts
auction as commission agents and controls selling fish in both domestic and
foreign markets. Aratdars play an important role in the fish market. When fish
come to the wholesale markets aratdars take the responsibility and control each
sale. They sell the fish through an auctioning system and get a commission depending
on the fish species. Two types of aratdars were found in fish value chain viz.
(1) Aratdar-1, who accumulates fish from local traders, fishers, foria and paiker
and after auction transport to the secondary market, (2) Aratdar-2 usually stays
in big cities who receives fish from the wholesalers and through second time
auctioning, sell those to the retailers (Nowsad, 2010).
Invariably they had own store house, good relation with the fishermen and thus
earn very good profit. The number of aratdars were the highest in Dhaka, as
maximum as 1899, while lower in Rangpur 215. A good number of aratdars were
also involved in Rajshahi, Barishal and Chittagong division. These indicate
the higher trade flow and economic activity of these areas. Several major inland
culture and capture zones lie on Dhaka, like haor fishery of Kishorganj and
Netrokona and aquaculture of greater Mymensingh. On the other hand maximum gathering
of affluent/well of consumers in and around capital attracts fish traders to
rush most of the harvest towards Dhaka. In Rajshahi division, Chalan beel is
one of the country’s biggest inland fishing zones, esteems the higher trade
flow.
Paikers or wholesalers are those who buy fish from aratdar through open auction
and sell fishes to retailers. They play a significant role in fish landing centers
and markets. They also collect fish from fishermen and suppliers and sell them
in wholesale market through commission agents. Sometimes these paikers are found
to purchase fish from local arat and transport fish to district cities and municipal
areas to sell those to secondary arat. Aratdars provide loan facility to wholesalers/transporters
to attract them and ensure fish selling through their arat. Likewise the number
of fish markets and aratdars, paikers were also maximum in Dhaka division and
minimum in Rangpur.
Retailers are those who buy fish from wholesalers and sell them to ultimate
consumers. The function of retailers is to procure supplies and display them
in forms and at times which is convenient for consumers. They are the last link
of intermediaries in the channel of domestic fish marketing before the consumer.
They buy fish from wholesale markets (Aratdar 1 or Arader 2) and sell these
to the consumers in open market place. Sometime retailers intend to sell fish
from door to door as fish vendors (hawkers). Usually retailers buy fish from
arat (wholesale market) on credit and pay the value after selling. The retailers
who trade a large volume of fish in big cities employ helper and cutter. Helpers
help the retailers to sell the fish and cutter cut the fish during sale on demand
of the buyers. In this study retailers involved in fish markets were counted
by the UFOs. The number of retailers were highest in Dhaka, followed by Rajshahi,
Khulna, Chittagong, Sylhet, Rangpur and Barishal. This also corresponds well
and compatible with the other stakes in different divisions. Similar influence
and involvement of stakeholders were found by Nowsad (2010),
Rahman et al. (2009) and Islam
et al. (2006). The numbers of fish landing centers, markets and stakeholders
are shown in Table 1.
Seasonality of fish landing: Landing centers were found to be two types
on the basis of the season of the operation. The landing centers which were
operated throughout the whole year are termed as “year round landing center”
and those were operated only for a certain period of the year is denominated
as “seasonal landing center”. Most of the landing centers were year
round, accounted a 82, 90, 70, 100, 71, 100 and 80% in Dhaka, Rajshahi, Khulna,
Rangpur, Chittagong, Barishal and Sylhet, respectively. On the other hand, 18,
10, 30, 29 and 20% landing centers were found to be seasonal in Dhaka, Rajshahi,
Khulna, Chittagong and Sylhet, respectively (Table 2). There
were no seasonal landing centers in Rangpur and Barishal. In seasonal landing
centers, the landing of fish is done mainly during the winter. Year round landing
centers are found in the area, where vast quantity of fish are captured and
cultured throughout the whole year. On the other hand, seasonal landing centers
are mainly found in the areas where fish are only captured in low lying areas
due to squeezing of water body in winter. These seasonal landing centers were
identified mainly in the haor and floodplain areas where the huge glut catches
are captured in winter season.
| Table 2: |
Seasonality of fish landing center |
 |
These seasonal landing centers were year round landing center in the past.
But due to effect of climate change perennial water bodies were squeezed of
to narrow pit. So, fish capture and landing are also disturbed. Fish landing
centers were found to be shifted and their modes of operation were changed based
on the availability of fish. These were found to be happened frequently in coastal
and riverine landing. Sonadia of Cox’s Bazar once a large landing center
has been seized of all landing activities now due to bad communication facilities.
Time of fish landing in coastal fishing has also been changed due to shifting
of fish stock.
Domestic fish distribution chain: Fish distribution channel is a route
along which harvested fish from the ponds or open waters is shipped to consumers.
Fish distribution channel in Bangladesh is almost entirely conducted, financed
and regulated by traditional, hardworking and skilled middlemen. The market
chain from farmers/fishermen to consumers passes through a number of intermediaries:
broker, commission agents/aratdars, foria, wholesaler, transporter, processor,
vendor and retailer (Fig. 1). The demand of fish is high in
markets but supply is limited and a strong network has developed with brokers
and traders intervening between farmers at one end and the consumers at the
other end. With a few exceptions, farmers never directly communicate with consumers,
market communication normally being made through middlemen. The middlemen usually
buy fish from the farmers but do not seem to have formal agreements. Actually
farmers would not like to bring their fish to wholesalers, because small catches,
lack of market information, poor road and transport facilities, lack of money
for fish transportation, negligible experience and technical knowledge on trading
etc. The fisherman often sells fish to a mobile collector or assembler, who
may be known as a jogandar or a foria. The assembler uses a collector boat or
a truck to collect the fish. When buying in estuaries or rivers, he may buy
through a local agent (broker) who typically earns a 1% commission for his services.
Normally the fisherman receives credit known as ‘dadon’ from these
guyes, also called mahajon, for which he is bound to sell his catch to the mahajon.
|
| Fig. 1: |
Fish distribution channel |
The mahajon sells the fish in a wholesale market to local retailers (nickaries),
local wholesalers (paikers), or transporters who transport the fish to other
districts (beparis or chalanis). The sale is normally carried out through the
medium of a commission agent (aratdar-1) who conducts public auctions. In some
markets, fish is weighed during auctioning but more often it is not. Ilish is
typically sold by the count of 80 fish, this measure being known as a ‘pon’.
The aratdar also extends seasonal advances to his suppliers and short-term credit
to the buyers. His basic remuneration is his sales commission, which is charged
to sellers at rates normally between 3 and 6%. Here they sell to local retailers
(nickaries) and wholesalers (paikers) through higher category aratdars (here
we call aratdar-2) who render similar services to the first level aratdars (atartder-1)
referred to above. After purchasing fish at the higher secondary markets, local
wholesalers (paikers) sell to retailers (nikaries) of upazilla markets and of
village markets (hats) and finally reach the consumer. Fish markets studied
by Coulter and Disney (1987) also found almost similar
results to this.
Major fish production zones: Much of the fish catch, particularly from
inland waters, was found to be sold and consumed locally by the consumers within
the same district. However, there were areas which consumed less than they produce
and therefore had a surplus which was distributed to other areas of the country.
Nowsad (2010) divided Bangladesh into six fishery zones
viz. (1) Dhaka-Mymensingh- Sylhet zone for culture and capture fishery, (2)
Greater Jessore zone for culture fishery (3) Khulna-Bagerhat-Sathkhira for shrimp
and prawn fishery (4) Pabna-Rajshahi and North Bengal for inland culture and
capture fishery, (5) Comilla-Chandpur-Barishal-Barguna for floodplain and hilsa
fishery and (6) Chittagong-Cox’s Bazar for marine capture fishery.
| Table 3: |
Major fish production zones of the country |
 |
In this study, the major fish production zones where inland capture and culture
and marine capture fish landed were identified as Khulna, Jessore, Kishorganj,
Mymensingh, Netrokona, Natore, Chittagong, Cox’s Bazar, Rangamati, Chandpur,
Daudkandi of Comilla, Barishal, Barguna, Sunamganj and Sylhet (Table
3).
Major routes of fish transportation: The landed fish were distributed
to other districts through the major gateways following some main distribution
routes (Table 4). The major gateways were identified as Shwarighat,
Karwanbazar, Jatrabari and Gabtoli of Dhaka, Trishal of Mymensingh, Mohonganj
of Netrokona, Rajshahi city, Barobazar of Jessore, Bogra city, Rangpur city,
Dinajpur city, Fishery ghat of Chittagong, Chittagong city, Homna of Comilla,
Comilla city, Patharghata of Barguna, Hijla of Barishal, Barishal city and Sylhet
city. Most of the surplus fish were distributed to capital Dhaka, from the major
fish landing areas through the main distribution routes. Most of the fish were
found to be distributed to the district cities and municipal areas due to the
maximum number of consumers and high price of fish.
Distance of fish transported from the district: Fish is found in almost
every district in Bangladesh. It was found that both captured and cultured fish
were transported to big cities and metropolitan areas from the production zones
of the country. The transported fish were categorized into five groups according
to distance transported viz., <50, 51-100, 101-200, 201-500 and >500 km.
It was found that 62.83% of the fish were transported only upto 100 km (Table
5). Only 5.73% of fish were transported to more than 500 km. Fish in Rangpur
division were transported only upto 200 km.
| Table 4: |
Major gateways for receiving fish from landing center |
 |
It was found that fish from most of the districts were transported only up
to 100 km due feeding up local consumers. It indicates that these districts
are deficit in fish production where commercial productions are exclusively
lacking.
Quantity of fish landed: The data on quantity of fish landed obtained
by the questionnaire survey were verified by governmental statistics (FSYB,
2010). The compiled results are presented here. The quantity of fish landed/day
in Dhaka, Rajshahi, Khulna, Rangpur, Chittagong, Barishal and Sylhet division
were 1455.93, 799.64, 989.02, 425.19, 2425.68, 821.32 and 484.23 metric ton,
respectively (Fig. 2). Highest amount of fish was landed in
Chittagong division and lowest amount of fish was landed in Rangpur division.
Source of harvested fish: The main sources of fish in Bangladesh were
found to be the river, beel, floodplain, pond, baor, coastal area/sea and shrimp/prawn
farm. The quantity of fish harvested from these sources was different in different
regions. It was found that the quantity of fish harvested from river, beel,
Kaptai lake floodplain, pond, baor, coastal area/sea and shrimp/prawn farm were
5.25, 4.41, 0.13, 35.03, 38.22, 0.23, 10.93 and 5.80%, respectively. The detailed
result of the source of harvested fish in different divisions is shown in Table
6. The highest quantity of fish was harvested from the culture pond. Significant
amount of fish were also harvested from the floodplain areas. This result corresponded
well with the government statistics (FSYB, 2010). Out
of the total fish production 94.5% were from inland capture and culture fisheries
and about 5.5% were from marine capture fisheries (DOF, 2011).
Culture fisheries were dominating in the inland production, accounting about
58% of the total catch.
| Table 5: |
Distance (%) covered by the distributed fish |
 |
| Table 6: |
Source of harvested fish* |
 |
| *Based on data obtained from present study and from (FSYB,
2010) |
|
| Fig. 2: |
Quantity of fish landed/day in different divisions |
| Table 7: |
Commonalities and divergence of major constrains of fish
markets |
 |
Constraints of the existing fish landing centers and markets: Although
the problems affecting the fish landing centers and markets were found to be
slightly different in different divisions but some common problems were found
to be the main barrier of good landing and distribution of fish. The common
constraints identified were lack of modern infrastructure facilities in the
fish landing and market, insufficient cold storage facility, insufficient ice
factory, unhygienic environment and influence of middlemen. Subasinghe
(1995) found that the quality of fish markets in most domestic markets in
the Asian region is far from satisfactory. He identified that poor onboard practices,
poor infrastructure, handling and storage facilities are the major causes for
the low quality of fish in the landing centers and domestic markets. Similar
fish landing and distribution problems were found by Parween
et al. (1996) and Rokeya et al. (1997).
The divergent problems on the basis of divisions and the common problems related
fish market and marketing are shown in Table 7.
CONCLUSION
The present study aimed to know the feature of fish landing centers and major
fish markets, types and nature of intermediaries involved, distribution and
marketing with trend of succession and depletion associated with the constraints
and threats of major stakeholders in the fish distribution channel along with
solution options.
Therefore in summing up, the following conclusions and recommendations are
made:
| • |
Fish landing centers are shifting and mode of operations are
changing based on the availability of fish |
| • |
Surplus fish are distributed from the production zones through some specific
routes and gateways throughout the country |
| • |
Landing and distribution of fish are practiced with inadequate facilities
and ill-control of the intermediaries |
| • |
Appropriate authority should pay proper attention for infrastructure improvement
and market development, so that the smooth distribution can take place from
the production zone ensuring fair price in the market |
| • |
Follow-up research is required to both validate and update the fish landing
and distribution data |
Subscribe Today
