Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Genetic Relationships of Langur Species Using AFLP Markers



Arunrat Chaveerach, Tawatchai Tanee, Nison Sattayasai, Alongkoad Tanomtong, Scott A. Suareze and Suporn Nuchadomrong
 
ABSTRACT

Cytogenetic studies of five langur species using conventional banding pattern were investigated. All species studied have an identical number of 44 diploid chromosomes, they are assumed to have common evolutionary relationships. For in depth study, molecular markers were assessed using the Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) method. With seven successful primer combinations, a total of 1043 scorable bands were generated. The percentage of polymorphic bands for each primer ranged from 48.60 to 94.12%. The resulting bands were used for dendrogram construction. From the dendrogram, the individuals of Trachypithecus species are grouped into two major clusters, T. phayrei is clustered with T. obscurus, while T. cristatus is clustered with T. francoisi. The bootstrap value between two groups is 94%. The other cluster, Presbytis femoralis is separated from the Trachypithecus species with a bootstrap value of 94%. Averages of inter-specific genetic similarity values among all langur species studied are 70.16% (between T. obscurus and P. femoralis) to 88.12% (between T. phayrei and T. obscurus). In summary T. phayrei might be a subspecies of T. obscurus. The development of specific molecular markers of a species is beneficial for genetic differentiation of this group of primates.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Arunrat Chaveerach, Tawatchai Tanee, Nison Sattayasai, Alongkoad Tanomtong, Scott A. Suareze and Suporn Nuchadomrong, 2007. Genetic Relationships of Langur Species Using AFLP Markers. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10: 1445-1451.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.1445.1451

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.2007.1445.1451

INTRODUCTION

The diversity of living colobines is portrayed by the recognition in most classifications of some 30 species. They have been grouped into 4 or 9 genera and these genera are often arranged in two clusters, one African and one Asian. The phylogenetic separation of the Asian colobines is less clearly united than the African species. The Asian colobines, commonly referred to as langurs, are comprised of 6 genera (Semnopithecus, Trachypithecus, Presbytis, Pygathrix, Nasalis and Simias) and about 31 species (Oates et al., 1994). In Thailand, 2 genera and 4 species are recognized, Presbytis femoralis, Trachypithecus cristatus, T. phayrei and T. obscurus.

There is still very little scientific data available on the distribution and status of primates in Thailand. In recent years, a number of surveys has been conducted and our knowledge has increased considerably. However, at this time no comprehensive work has been published which compiles all of the data on this subject from the whole country. This lack of knowledge about the status and distribution of leaf monkeys in Thailand poses a serious problem in terms of how to conduct a long-term conservation program.

The genetic relationships among different colobine species are still controversially discussed with unavailable material. The currently accepted classification of langurs is mainly based on morphological studies, while their cytogenetics (Tanomtong et al., 2006) and molecular genetics have become important tools (Nadler et al., 2003). As part of a study on the complete genetic relationships of Colobinae, the Thai langurs play a key role, because of the high number of endemic species and the low amount of currently available data.

The Amplified Fragment Length Polymorphism (AFLP) technique is one DNA fingerprinting procedure which uses PCR to amplify a limited set of DNA fragments from a specific DNA sample. Since AFLP analysis does not require prior genetic information of the taxa studied, it should be of value in phylogenetic analysis of a wide variety of organisms (Vos et al., 1995). Furthermore, AFLP phenotypes are highly reproducible (Ovilo et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2005) and thus, reliable (Aggarwal et al., 1999; Sudupak et al., 2004). The AFLP markers have been widely applied in plant and animal studies and have the potential for analyzing genetic variation and phylogenetic relationships among and within closely related species (Aggarwal et al., 1999; Mace et al., 1999; Loh et al., 2000; Despres et al., 2002; Pelser et al., 2003; Banfer et al., 2004; Chen et al., 2004; Sudupak et al., 2004; Ude et al., 2003; Wang et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2005).

From the advantage of AFLP above, we investigate the genetic relationships of langur species in Thailand using the AFLP technique in order to clarify their taxonomic status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection: Blood samples from 5 dusky leaf monkeys (T. obscurus from Southern Thailand), 3 phayre’s leaf monkeys (T. phayrei 1 from Northern Thailand, T. phayrei 2 from central Thailand and T. phayrei 3 from Northeastern Thailand), 3 silvered leaf monkeys (T. cristatus from Northeastern Thailand), a francois’s langur (T. froncoisi from Nakhonrachasima zoo, Thailand, it is not common species in Thailand), a banded leaf monkey (P. femoralis from Northeastern Thailand) and a slow loris (Nycticebus coucang) as outgroup were collected. The collected locations are shown on a map of Thailand (Fig. 1). The samples were divided into two groups, the first for cytogenetic analysis and the second for molecular analysis.

Cytogenetic analysis: The cultured cells were examined by the colchicines-hypotonic fixation-air drying technique followed by a conventional technique (Tanomtong et al., 2005). Chromosomal checks were performed with 20 cells of each individual by light microscopy.

Molecular analysis
DNA isolation:
Genomic DNA was extracted from blood samples following Sambrook and Russel (2001). The quality and quantity of extracted DNA was assessed by 0.8% agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometry.


Fig. 1: Map of Thailand indicating sample collection of langurs (•), where N is Northern Thailand, NE is Northeastern Thailand, C is Central Thailand, W is Western Thailand, E is Eastern Thailand and S is Southern Thailand

AFLP reaction: The procedures of the AFLP method (Vos et al., 1995) were performed according to the protocol of the Kit (AFLPR Analysis System I, Invitrogen, USA). After adaptor ligation and preselective amplification, selective amplification was conducted with 28 primer combinations and seven primer combinations: E-ACC/M-CAG, E-AAC/M-CAT, E-AAC/M-CAG, E-AAG/M-CAT, E-AAG/M-CTT, E-AGG/M-CTT and E-AGC/M-CAT were successful. The PCR products amplified with different primer combinations were loaded onto 6.0% denaturing polyacrylamide gels and electrophoresed for 3 h and detected by Silver QuestTM Silver Staining Kit (Invitrogen, USA).

Data analysis: Each AFLP band was considered as an independent character and the bands were scored visually as either absent (0) or present (1) for each band across all samples with the same primer pairs. Qualitative differences in band intensity were not considered. With the band data, a pair-wise genetic similarity matrix was generated between five langur species using Ochiai similarity coefficients which were then converted to a genetic distance matrix. Based on the genetic distance matrix, cluster analyses were performed and corresponding dendrograms were constructed for five langur species using the Single linkage Cluster method. Cophenetic correlations were computed from the clustering matrix in order to get the best fit dendrogram. All these analyses were done using the Fingerprinting II program (BioRad, USA).

RESULTS

Results from lymphocyte culture of whole blood and conventional staining of the five langur species, namely Presbytis femoralis, Trachypithecus cristatus, T. froncoisi, T. phayrei and T. obscurus indicate that all species have an identical number of 44 diploid chromosomes (2n) consisting of 42 autosomes and 2 sex chromosomes. A representative chromosome of the five langur species is from a female of T. cristatus chromosome as shown in Fig. 2.

AFLP fragments were established for three individuals of T. phayrei, five individuals of T. obscurus, three individuals of T. cristatus, an individual of T. froncoisi and an individual of P. femolaris. Seven primer combinations yielded a total of 1043 scorable bands and averaged 149 per primer. Of these bands, 61.74% were polymorphic. Percentages of Polymorphic Bands (PPB) for each primer ranged from 48.60% to 94.12%. Primer EcoRI-AAG/MseI-CTT combinations produced the highest number of bands (179), while primer EcoRI-AGC/MseI-CAT combinations produced a minimum number of bands (119) (Table 1). Figure 3 presents AFLP fingerprinting of five langur species with seven primer combinations.

A dendrogram was constructed based on the AFLP scoring data and using single linkage cluster ananlysis (Fig. 4). Within langur species, they are separated into two groups, Presbytis and Trachypithecus, whereas the outgroup N. coucang accession is segregated from the langurs with a high bootstrap value of 99%.


Table 1: A summary of AFLP primers, number of bands scored, number of polymorphic bands and percentage of polymorphisms for amplification profiles of five species of Thai langurs

Fig. 2: Diploid chromosome number of female T. cristatus, 2n = 44 consisting of 42 autosomes and 2 sex

Fig. 3: Specific banding patterns of five langur species with the seven successful primer combinations

Fig. 4: Dendrogram depicting the seven AFLP primer combinations produced by single linkage cluster analysis that is used to clarify the genetic relationships of five langur species

Table 2: The average similarity index values based on the AFLP analysis of five langur species and N. coucang

The Presbytis group contains only species P. femoralis derived from Trachypithecus group with 94% bootstrap support. Within the Trachypithecus group, T. phayrei is clustered with T. obscurus, while T. cristatus is clustered with T. francoisi with 82% bootstrap support. Averages values of inter-specific genetic similarity (S) among all langur studied species are 70.16% (between T. obscurus and P. femoralis) to 88.12% (between T. phayrei and T. obscurus) (Table 2).

DISCUSSION

The identity of diploid chromosome number (2n = 44) of five langur species from cytogenetic studies agrees with Chiarelli (1963), Ponsa et al. (1983), Bigoni et al. (1997), Nie et al. (1998) and Wienberg (2005), reflecting the close genetic relationships among species of langurs. The chromosome number does not contain information sufficient for completely resolving the genetic relationships of langurs, so the AFLP molecular marker was used to elucidate. AFLP fingerprints were highly reproducible in samples studied. A high level of polymorphism was found among langur species. The Presbytis species formed a distinct cluster (Fig. 4) that only links with the Trachypithecus species at a level of 75.02% similarity. Within the genus Trachypithecus, T. phayrei is very closely related to T. obscurus based on the highest S value, 88.12%, while the lowest S value within species is 87.50% (in T. cristatus). Moreover, these two species are not a monophyletic group. The T. phayrei from Central, Northern and Northeastern Thailand could not be distinguished clearly and are not divided into a single cluster with high (82%) bootstrap support.

Based on the morphology, a more judicious solution is to divide the ring species into components reflecting their predominant pelage color: Silver (T. villosus), grey (T. barbei) and brown (T. obscurus). Brandon-Jones et al. (2004) therefore treats typical T. phayrei as a subspecies of T. obscurus, while Pocock (1935) treats it as a species. However, Pocock rightly acknowledged that it is very similar to typical T. obscurus from the southern part of the Malay Peninsula.

We agree with Brandon-Jones et al. (2004) viewpoint, i.e., the phayre’s leaf monkey is not a valid separate species. It is better to regard T. phayrei as a subspecies of T. obscurus. In order to resolve the genetic relationships between T. obscurus and T. phayrei properly, it is necessary to study a larger sample, as well as to consider comparative behavioral studies. Thus, these results suggest that genetic analysis based on AFLP fingerprinting has a good capacity for study of species diversity, especially in langurs. As AFLP analysis does not require prior genetic information of the taxa studied and AFLP fingerprints are reproducible, this technique should be of value in genetic analysis of a wide variety of primates. Moreover, the seven successful primer combinations can be sufficiently used to determine genetic differences of five langur species.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

This work was supported in part by Khon Kaen University’s Graduate Research Fund, Academic Year 2004.

REFERENCES
Aggarwal, R.K., D.S. Brar, S. Nandi, N. Huang and G.S. Khush, 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among Oryza species revealed by AFLP markers. Theor. Applied Gene., 98: 1320-1328.

Banfer, G., B. Fiala and K. Weising, 2004. AFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships among myrmecophytic species of Macaranga (Euphorbiaceae) and their allies. Plant Sys. Evol., 249: 213-231.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Bigoni, F., U. Koehler, R. Stanyon, T. Ishida and J. Wienberg, 1997. Fluorescence in situ hybridization establishes homology between human and silvered leaf monkey chromosome, reveals reciprocal translocations between chromosome homologous to human Y/5, 1/9 and 6/16 and delineates an1X2Y1Y2/X1X1X2X2 sex-chromosome system. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 23: 315-327.

Brandon-Jones, D., A.A. Eudey, T. Geissmann, C.P. Groves and D.J. Melnick et al., 2004. Asian primate classification. Int. J. Primatol., 25: 97-164.
Direct Link  |  

Chen, J., P.S. Devanand, D.J. Norman, R.J. Henny and C.C.T. Chao, 2004. Genetic relationships of aglaonema species and cultivars inferred from AFLP Markers. Ann. Bot., 93: 157-166.
Direct Link  |  

Chiarelli, B., 1963. Comparative morphometric analysis of primate chromosome. III the chromosomes of the genera Hylobates, Colobus and Presbytis. Caryologia, 16: 637-647.

Despres, L., L. Gielly, B. Redoutet and P. Taberlet, 2003. Using AFLP to resolve phylogenetic relationships in a morphologically diversified plant species complex when nuclear and chloroplast sequences fail to reveal variability. Mol. Phylogen. Evol., 27: 185-196.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Liu, Y.G., S.L. Chen, B.F. Li, Z.J. Wang and Z. Liu, 2005. Analysis of genetic variation in selected stocks of atchery flounder, Paralichthys olivaceus, using AFLP markers. Biochem. Sys. Ecol., 33: 993-1005.
Direct Link  |  

Loh, J.P., R. Kiew, O. Set, L.H. Gan and Y.Y. Gan, 2000. Amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting of 16 banana cultivars (Musa cvs.). Mol. Phylogene. Evol., 17: 360-366.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

Mace, E.S., C.G. Gebhardt and R.N. Lester, 1999. AFLP analysis of genetic relationships in the tribe Datureae (Solanaceae). Theor. Applied Genet., 99: 634-641.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Nadler, T., F. Momberg, N. Xuan Dang and N. Lormee, 2003. Leaf monkeys: vietnam primate conservation status review 2002-part 2. Fauna and Flora International Asia Pacific Programme Office, Vietnam. pp: 230.

Nie, W., R. Liu, Y. Chen, J. Wang and F. Yang, 1998. Mapping chromosomal homologies between humans and two langurs (Semnopithecus francoisi and S. phayrei) by chromosome painting. Chromosome Res., 6: 447-453.

Oates, J.F., A. Glyn Davies and E. Delson, 1994. The Diversity of Living Colobines. Cambridge University press, England, pp: 45-76.

Ovilo, C., M.T. Cervera, C. Castellanos and J.M. Martinez-Zapater, 2000. Characteriztion of Iberian pig genotypes using AFLP markers. Anim. Gene., 31: 117-122.
PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Pelser, P.B., B. Gravendeel and R.V.D. Meijden, 2003. Phylogeny reconstruction in the gap between too little and too much divergence: The closest relatives of Senecio jacobaea (Asteraceae) according to DNA sequences and AFLPs. Mol. Phylogene. Evol., 29: 613-628.
Direct Link  |  

Pocock, R.I., 1935. The monkeys of the genera LPithecus (or Presbytes) and Pygathrix found to the east of the Bay of Bengal. Proc. Zool. Soc. Lond, 1934: 895-961.

Ponsa, M., L.E.M. de Boer and J. Egozcue, 1983. Banding patterns of the chromosome of Presbytis cristatus pyrrhus and P. obscurus. Am. J. Primatol., 4: 165-169.

Sambrook, J. and D.W. Russell, 2001. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, pp: 6: 28-6.

Sudupak, M.A., M.S. Akkaya and A. Kence, 2004. Genetic relationships among perennial and annual Cicer species growing in Turkey assessed by AFLP fingerprinting. Theor. Applied Gene., 108: 937-944.
Direct Link  |  

Tanomtong, A., S. Khunsook, A. Chaveerach, W. Kaensa and R. Banjongrat, 2006. Comparative phylogenetic studies of rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta) and human (Homo sapiens) using G-Banding Pattern. Cytologia, 71: 87-92.

Tanomtong, A., S. Khunsook, W. Kaensa and R. Banjongrat, 2005. Cytogenetics of pig-tailed macaque (Macaca nemestrina) by conventional staining. Naresuan University J., 13: 1-11.

Ude, G.N., W.J. Kenworthy, J.M. Costa, P.B. Cregan and J. Alvernaz, 2003. Genetic diversity of soybean cultivars from China, Japan, North America and North American ancestral lines determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism. Crop Sci., 43: 1858-1867.
Direct Link  |  

Vos, P., R. Hogers, M. Bleeker, M. Reijans and T. van de Lee et al., 1995. AFLP: A new technique for DNA fingerprinting. Nucleic Acids Res., 23: 4407-4414.
CrossRef  |  PubMed  |  Direct Link  |  

Wang, Z.Y., T.K. Ho and K.H. Chu, 2004. Applications of AFLP technology in genetic and phylogenetic analysis of penaeid shrimp. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 32: 399-407.

Wienberg, J., 2005. Fluorescence in situ hybridization to chromosomes as a tool to understand human and primate genome evolution. Cytogenet. Genome Res., 108: 139-160.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2019 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved