• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences
  2. Vol 2 (1), 1999
  3. 247-250
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 1999 | Volume: 2 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 247-250
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.1999.247.250
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on the Fodder Yield and Quality of Two Sorghum cultivars (Sorghum bicolor L.)

M. Ayub, A. Tanveer, K. Mahmud, A. Ali and M. Azam

ABSTRACT


Response of two sorghum cultivars namely Hegari and JS-263 to different NP levels of 0-0, 50-0, 100-0, 50-50, 100-50 and 100-100 kg ha–1 was studied under field conditions. The cultivar Hegari gave significantly higher green fodder and dry matter yield due to greater plant height, stem diameter and leaf area plant–1. The crude fiber per cent and ash per cent were also significantly higher for cultivar Hegari. A progressive increase in yield was observed with fertilizer application up to 100 kg N + 50 kg P205 ha–1 whereas, the quality parameters such as protein content, crude fiber and ash percent were significantly higher with NP application of 100 + 100 kg ha–1. The cultivar Hegari and fertilizer level of 100 kg N + 50 kg P205 ha–1 seems to be the best combination for harvesting higher fodder yield of sorghum under Faisalabad conditions.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation

How to cite this article

M. Ayub, A. Tanveer, K. Mahmud, A. Ali and M. Azam, 1999. Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on the Fodder Yield and Quality of Two Sorghum cultivars (Sorghum bicolor L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 2: 247-250.

DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.1999.247.250

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=pjbs.1999.247.250

INTRODUCTION


Sorghum plants can be fed to the animals as green fodder and also in the form of silage. Silage is an excellent feed stuff for dry season when grass and legume crops can not be grown successfully (Pholsen et al., 1998). The importance of fodder crops needs no emphasis because of the fact that the regular, an adequate and nutritious fodder is a basic requirement for livestock production to meet the demand of milk, butter and other byproducts for human consumption. Fodder scarcity is a major limiting factor for the development of livestock industry in Pakistan. The available fodder production is approximately 62-54 percent less than actual requirement (Bhatti, 1988).

Varieties vary in yield and quality traits (Ashraf et al., 1995). Zahid and Bhatti (1994) reported that green fodder yield of 8 sorghum hybrids ranged from 26.09 (BR-319) to 46.79 t ha–1 (FS-25E). Similarly, Hussain et al. (1995) compared seven cultivars of forage sorghum for yield and quality and they recommended Hegari, Roma No. 119 and No.94 for general cultivation due to better yield and quality traits. These varieties have more crude protein and less crude fiber. Bhatti et al. (1996) evaluated the performance of various sorghum varieties at different locations and they reported that sorghum CV. Sarokartuko gave highest green fodder yield (30.00 t ha–1) at AARI, Faisalabad followed by FS-466 (27.77 t ha–1), local Quetta ( 25.51 t ha–1) and No.1572 (25.36 t ha–1). Pholsen et al. (1998) reported that out of the ten cultivars used, 15-23585 and Rio could be considered the best cultivars for feed stuffs of ruminants animals.

The varieties also vary in their response to fertilizer application (Chandravanshi et al., 1973). Mishra and Singh (1978) studied the effect of 0-160 kg N and 0-40 kg P205 ha–1 on two sorghum cultivars under rained conditions. They noted that application of 120 kg N + 40 kg P205 ha–1 to cultivar Mau T-1 gave the highest grain yield. Muhammad and Hasan (1994) reported that CSH6 and CSH9 responded better to applied nitrogen than CSH14 and SPV 946. Waheed (1995) recommended 90 kg N and 60 kg P205 ha–1 for getting maximum fodder yield of sadabahar. The N application not only affect the forage production but also improve the quality of forage from view point of protein contents (Patel et al., 1994). Matowo et al. (1997) reported that increase in nitrogen rate increased the yield and protein concentration in flag leaf. The role of P205 on protein contents is somewhat controversial. Patel et al. (1993) reported that protein yield and protein contents were unaffected by P application. But Patel et al. (1994) obtained the highest protein yield of 0.64 t ha–1 with the application of 120 kg N + 20 kg P ha 1. Whereas, Choudhary and Karwasra (1984) reported that crude protein contents were increased with the increase in P.

To improve the quality and quantity of green fodder, it is therefore much essential to determine The fertilizer requirements of varieties. The purpose of present study was to evaluate the effects of different NP levels on fodder production and composition of two sorghum cultivars in Faisalabad conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS


Experiment to determine the effect of NP application on fodder yield and quality of two sorghum cultivars was conducted on a medium loam soil having 0-046 percent N, 10.67 PPM available P and 277 PPM K. The crop was sown with the help of single row hand drill on a well prepared seed bed in 30 cm apart rows on August 17, 1996. The experiment was laid out in a split plot design with three replications using a net plot size of 2.5 m x 6.0 m. Two sorghum cultivars Hegari and JS-263 were randomized in main plots and NP levels of 0-0, 50-0, 100-0, 50-50, 100-50, 100-100 in sub plots. The whole quantity of nitrogen and phosphorus was side drilled at the time of sowing in the form of urea and single super phosphate, respectively. All the treatments were sown by using a seed rate of 100 kg ha–1. All other cultural practices were kept normal and uniform for all the treatments. Ten plants per plot were selected randomly for recording individual plant observation like, plant height, stem diameter, number of leaves and leaf area per plant. Stem diameter was measured with the help of vernier calliper from the base, middle and top portion and averages were recorded. Leaf area was measured with the help of leaf area meter model LI-3000. Quality parameters like crude protein, crude fibre and ash percentage were determined by using methods recommended by AOAC (AOAC, 1984). Data collected were analyzed statistically by using Fisher’s analysis of variance technique and Duncan’s Multiple Range Test at p<0.05 was used to compare the significance of treatments means (Steel and Torrie, 1984).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION


Plant height was influenced significantly (p<0.05) by levels of nitrogen and phosphorus (Table 1). Significant increase in plant height over the control was observed by all fertilizers levels. The NP levels of 100-0, 100-50 and 100100 produced statistically similar plant height. The differences between 100-0 (159.50) and 50-50 (156.83) were non-significant. The maximum (162.18 cm) and minimum (140.00 cm) plant height was recorded at 0-0 and 100-100 NP kg ha–1 respectively. The application of P seems to be ineffective in improving the plant height of sorghum. The increase in plant height with nitrogen fertilizer have also been reported by Abbas and Younis (1988) and Abdel-Gawad (1993). But Medina et al. (1984) reported that NP application up to 150 and 90 kg ha–1 showed nonsignificant effect on the plant height. These contradictory results might be due to variation in the fertility status of the soil or differences in genetic make up of the varieties. The variety Hegari produced significantly taller plants (160.22 cm) as compared to JS-263 (151.0 cm). Naeem et al. (1992) have also reported significant differences among 25 exotic sorghum entries.

Application of nitrogen alone or in combination with phosphorus produced significantly thicker stem than control but the differences with in fertilizer levels were not significant. Maximum (1.13 cm) and minimum (0.74 cm) stem diameter was recorded with NP application of 100-100 kg ha–1 and control respectively. The results are contradictory to those of Medina et al. (1984). They reported that basal stem diameter was not influenced significantly by NP application. These contradictory results can be attributed to differences in genetic traits of the varieties. The variety Hegari has thicker stem (1.06 cm) than JS-263 (1.02 cm). The results are quite in line with those of Zahid and Bhatti (1994).

The crop fertilized at NP rate of 100-100 kg ha–1 resulted in significantly more leaf area per plant (3360.17 cm2) than all other fertilizer levels. The next follower NP levels were 100-50, 100-0 and 50-50 kg ha–1 producing leaf area of 2912.33 cm2, 2277.83 cm2 and 1960.50 cm2 respectively. The control produced the minimum leaf area per plant (1510.33 cm2). The results indicated that application of nitrogen alone at higher rate can give more leaf area per plant than combined application of NP at lower rate. The variety JS-263 gave significantly higher leaf area per plant (2399.72 cm2) than Hegari (2215.33 cm2). This may be attributed to their genetic traits of the crop plants. Hussain et al. (1995) have also reported significant differences for leaf area per plant among the varieties.

Green fodder yield was affected significantly both by the fertilizer levels and varieties. The application of 100 kg N+ 100 kg P remaining at par with NP level of 100-50 kg ha–1 produced significantly higher yield (43.9 t ha–1) than the remaining fertilizer levels. The minimum green fodder yield (23.4 t ha–1) was recorded in control plots. The differences between NP levels of 50-50 and 50-0 kg ha–1 were not significant. Significant effect of NP application on fodder yield of sorghum have also been reported by Medina et al. (1984) and Thakre (1994). Hegari gave significantly higher green fodder yield (38.4 t ha–1) than JS-263 (32.9 t ha–1 The results are similar to those of Bhatti et al. (1996) and Zahid and Bhatti (1994).

The trend of dry matter yield for both fertilizer and varieties was exactly similar as was recorded for green fodder yield. The maximum dry matter yield (15.68 t ha–1) was recorded with NP application of 100-100 kg ha–1 and minimum (8.10 t ha–1) was recorded in control. Hegari and JS-263 produced yields of 13.30 t ha–1 and 11.62 t ha–1 respectively and differences were significant. These results are quite in line with those of Gill et al. (1995) and Zahid and Bhatti (1994).

Protein content is one of the major ingredients determining the quality of fodder crops and were influenced significantly by application of fertilizers. A progressive increase in protein contents was observed with increased NP levels except the increase could not reach to a significant extent between NP levels of 50-0 and 100-0 kg ha–1. The maximum (13.37%) and minimum (8.28%) protein contents were observed at NP levels of 100-100 kg ha–1 and control respectively. The increase in protein contents with the increase of NP levels may be due to the reason that fertilizer has enhanced the amino acid formation. The increase in protein contents with NP application have also been reported by Path et al. (1984), Choudhary and Karwasra (1984), Patel et al. (1994) and Matowo et al. (1997). The results are contradictory to those of Patel et al. (1993). These contradictory results might have been due to differences in genetic make up of the varieties or differences in the fertility status of the soil. The varieties did not differ significantly from each other for crude protein contents and values were 11.12 percent and 10.37 percent for Hegari and JS-263 respectively.

The fodder having less crude fiber percentage is considered a good quality because higher the crude fiber percentage lesser will be digestibility. The trend of fertilizer levels on crude fiber was exactly similar as was observed for crude protein percentage. A significant increase in crude fiber percentage was observed with the increase in NP levels except that the increase could not reach to a significant level between NP levels of 50-0 and 100-0 kg ha–1.

Table 1: Effect of nitrogen and phosphorous on the fodder yield and quality of two sorghum cultivars
Image for - Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on the Fodder Yield and Quality of Two Sorghum cultivars (Sorghum bicolor L.)
Any two means, not sharing a letter in each column differ significantly (p<0.05)

The maximum (34.02 %) and minimum (26.25 %) crude fiber percentage was observed at NP levels of 100-100 kg ha–1 and control respectively. Almost similar results have been reported by Medina et al. (1984). The differences between varieties were also significant. The Hegari produced higher crude fiber percentage (32.0 %) than JS-263 (28.32 %). Ashraf et al. (1995), Hussain et al. (1995) and Pholsen et al. (1998) have also reported significant differences for crude fiber percentage among the different sorghum varieties.

The ash percentage was affected significantly both by fertilizer levels and varieties. The variety Hegari gave significantly higher ash percentage (9.24%) than JS-263 (8.91%). The variety Hegari seems to be more efficient in nutrient uptake than JS-263. A progressive and significant increase in ash percentage was noted at each NP levels. The maximum (11.14%) and minimum (7.16%) ash percentage was observed with NP application of 100-100 kg he and control respectively. These results are quite in line with those of Choudhary and Karwasra (1984) and Harumoto et al. (1986).

REFERENCES


  1. Abbas, H.A. and A.H. Younis, 1988. Effect of nitrogen fertilization and plant populations on yield and quality of sweet sorghum. Mesopotamia J. Agric., 20: 13-21.

  2. Abdel-Gawad, K.T., 1993. Water stress and nitrogen fertilization of forage sorghum. Bull. Fac. Agric. Univ. Cairo, 44: 587-598.

  3. AOAC., 1984. Official Methods of Analysis. 14th Edn., Association of Official Agricultural Chemists, Washington, DC., USA.

  4. Ashraf, Y., S.A. Nagre and A.H. Gillani, 1995. Micromineral contents of fodder as affected by varieties and harvesting intervals. J. Agric. Res., 33: 421-425.

  5. Bhatti, M.B., 1988. National Perspective for Fodder Crops in Pakistan. NARC., Islamabad, pp: 1-2.

  6. Bhatti, M.В., S. Khan, A. Hussain, M.S. Zahid and M.U. Mufti, 1996. Performance of various sorghum and millet varieties under local conditions. J. Agric. Res., 33: 45-46.

  7. Chandravanshi, B.R., A.K. Sharma and R.B. Arwar, 1973. Performance of few sorghum cultivars under varying levels of nitrogen fertilization. Fert. News, 18: 41-42.

  8. Choudhary, S.L. and S.P.S. Karwasra, 1984. Effect of phosphorus application on yield, content and quality of forage sorghum. Nepalese J. Agric., 15: 27-32.

  9. Gill, M.P.S., N.S. Dhillon and G. Dev, 1995. Phosphorous requirement of pearl millet and sorghum fodder as affected by native fertility of arid brown soil. Indian J. Agric. Res., 29: 83-88.

  10. Harumoto, T., Y. Uzuta and T. Matsui, 1986. Effects of additional fertilizer and harvesting time on the production and nutritive value in dual purpose sorghum. Bull. Fac. Agric. Shimane Univ., 20: 13-18.

  11. Hussain, A., M.D. Sartaj and M.B. Bhatti, 1995. Performance of various cultivars of forage (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) under rainfed conditions. J. Agric. Res., 33: 413-419.

  12. Matowo, P.R., G.M. Pierzynski, D.A. Whitney and R.E. Lamond, 1997. Long term effects of tillage and nitrogen source, rate and placement on grain sorghum production. J. Prod. Agric., 10: 141-146.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  13. Medina, L.B., V. Riquelme and E.O.V. Oyervides, 1984. The effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer and population density on lowland fodder sorghum production under irrigation. Reuista Chapingo, 9: 152-156.

  14. Mishra, A.P. and V.S. Singh, 1978. Response of sorghum to nitrogenous and phosphatic fertiliser application under Bundelkhand conditions. Indian J. Agron., 23: 363-365.

  15. Muhammad, S. and M.V. Hasan, 1994. Assessment of the relative performance of sorghum genotypes and their nitrogen need for optimal production in security rainfall ecosystem. Crop Res., 8: 213-221.

  16. Naeem, M., S. Nasim and A. Shakoor, 1992. Evaluation of exotic sorghum germplasm for grain and fodder production under rainfed conditions. J. Agric. Res., 19: 185-188.

  17. Patel, G.N., P.G. Patel and J.C. Patel, 1994. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on yield and quality of forage sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Ind. J. Agron., 39: 123-125.

  18. Patel, K.I., R.P.S. Ahlawat and S.J. Trivedi, 1993. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus on nitrogen uptake and protein percentage of forage sorghum. Gujrat Agric. Univ. Res. J., 18: 87-88.

  19. Path, N.D., R.D. Path and R.N. Adsule, 1984. Influence of nitrogen on yield and quality of sorghum. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 19: 175-178.

  20. Pholsen, S., S. Kasikranan, P. Pholsen and A. Suksri, 1998. Dry matter yield, chemical components and dry matter degradability of ten sorghum cultivars (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) grown on oxic paleustult soil. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 1: 228-231.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  21. Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1984. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, pp: 173-177.

  22. Thakre, S.Y., 1994. Effect of nitrogen fertilization on striga (Striga astafica) infestation and yield of sorghum. PKV. Res. J., 18: 178-180.

  23. Waheed, A., 1995. Seed rate and fertilizer effect on Sadabahar fodder. 16th Annual Report, Division Livestock Production Research Institute, Bahadurnagar, Okara-Pakistan, pp: 59-60.

  24. Zahid, M.S. and M.B. Bhatti, 1994. Comparative study on fodder yield potential of different sorghum hybrids under rainfed conditions. Sarhad J. Agric., 19: 345-350.

Related Articles

Dry Matter Yield, Chemical Components and Dry Matter Degradability of Ten Sorghum Cultivars (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) Grown on Oxic Paleustult Soil

Leave a Reply


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved