Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Comparative Study of Forage Plants by Apis mellifera adansonii (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Osun State, Nigeria



Fasasi Kamilu Ayo and Afolabi Mariam Adunni
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Background and Objective: The quality of beehive products by Apis mellifera adansonii in different ecological zones is dependent on the quality and quantity of rich flora sources available within their explorative environment. The study investigated and compared forage plant species patronized by A. mellifera adansonii at Ejigbo and Osogbo districts. Materials and Methods: Plant species visited by honeybees which exhibited explorative behavior for at least 5-15 min with pollen loads were identified. Visit frequencies of honeybees on identified plant species were recorded using Capture-Mark-Recapture method. Results: Twenty-one plant species belonging to 15 families were identified being visited by A. mellifera adansonii as nectar and pollen sources at both districts. Chromolaena odorata (Asteraceae), Melanthera rhombifolia (Asteraceae), Tridax procumbens (Asteraceae), Stachytarpheta cayennensis (Verbenaceae), Stachytarpheta indica (Verbenaceae), Azadirachta indica (Meliaceae), Carica papaya (Caricaceae), Cola nitida (Sterculiaceae), Clerodendrum dusenii (Lamiaceae), Mangifera indica (Anacardiaceae), Manihot esculenta (Euphorbiaceae), Scoparia dulcis (Plantaginaceae), Sida scabrida (Malvaceae), Solanum gilo (Solanaceae), Talium triangulare (Portulacaceae), Vernonia amygdalina (Compositae), Zea mays (Poaceae) were identified honeybees’ foraged plants at Ejigbo. Carica papaya, C. odorata, M. rhombifolia, S. scabrida, S. indica, T. triangulare, T. procumbens and Z. mays were common at both districts. Results showed no significant differences (p>0.05) in the visitation intensity on identified honeybees’ foraged plant species across both districts. This implies that honeybees probably patronize plant species with preferred rewarding food sources despite ecological differences and distance. Conclusion: It is recommended that rewarding plant species should be identified and cultivated in different ecological zones to boost production of beehives’ products.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Similar Articles in this Journal
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

Fasasi Kamilu Ayo and Afolabi Mariam Adunni, 2019. Comparative Study of Forage Plants by Apis mellifera adansonii (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Osun State, Nigeria. Journal of Applied Sciences, 19: 121-127.

DOI: 10.3923/jas.2019.121.127

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2019.121.127
 
Received: December 29, 2018; Accepted: February 01, 2019; Published: April 06, 2019


Copyright: © 2019. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

INTRODUCTION

Honeybees, A. mellifera, depend solely on nectar and pollens of plants for food. Worker bees make thousands of visits to flowers to collect nectar and pollen. While doing this, they pollinate indirectly the flowers, thereby helping to increase fruit and seed yield both in wild and cultivated plants. They generally gather nectar and pollen beyond their immediate needs thereby constantly exuding and preserving the surplus as honey within the honeycombs during nectar and pollens flow period1. Honeybees visit diverse flowers of variety of plant species to gather nectar and pollen, making plant fertilization possible which translates to conservation of biodiversity in the wild2. Honeybees contribute immensely to the maintenance of ecosystems and Agricultural production while they produce important products such as honey, bees wax, royal jelly and propolis1. In 2000, the estimated value of increased yield and quality of crops, due to pollination by honeybees, in the United States of America was $14.6 billion2. Nectar secretion within flowers usually starts about the time flowers open and cease soon after fertilization2. Beekeepers refer to the heaviest nectar production as honey-flow and most regions have predictable blooming seasons of best nectar-producing flowers1. Plants visited by honeybees can be identified through direct observation of foraging bees, palynological analysis of honey, analysis of pollen loads removed from returning foragers and analysis of pollen stores in nests or hives3,4.

Studies in various ecological zones of Nigeria revealed large diversity of honeybee flora in the country. Ayansola and Davies3 reported 49 plant species from the Tropical Rain Forest and Derived Savanna zones of southwestern Nigeria, while Nnamani and Uguru5 identified 56 plant species in south eastern, Nigeria. On the other hand, Mbah and Amao6 and Ebenezer and Olugbenga7 identified 28 and 26 plant species, respectively from Guinea Savanna zone in north central part of the country while Abdullahi et al.8 identified 103 plant species from Sudan Savanna zone in the north-eastern part. Gezahegn9 noted that not all plant species are important to honeybees. Those plants that supply both nectar and pollen abundantly when in bloom are often called honeybee plants10. The honeybee plants are best suited for honey production as well as colony maintenance, in that honeybees obtain protein from pollen source plants and carbohydrate from nectar source plants11. Nectar producing plant species are of utmost interest to beekeepers except few plants. Most reliable nectar producers in Florida are Avicennia germinans, Schinus terebinthifoliusas, Sabal palmetto, Ilex glabra, Melaleuca quinquenervia, Serenoa repens and Nyssa ogeche as identified by Sanford12. Delaphane et al.13 revealed that in planting bee pastures, it is important to choose a collection of plants that will produce unbroken succession of bloom throughout the season. Also, planting or encouraging permanent bee pasture near apiary improves bee nutrition13. The distribution and type of honeybee plants as well as their flowering duration vary from region to region due to variations in topography, climate and farming practices. Hence, every region has its own honey flow and floral dearth periods of short or long duration and the knowledge on bee flora helps in the effective management of bee colony during such period 11. Generally, flowering calendars make it easier to plan various beekeeping management operations such as the citing of hives near some selected crops and deciding the best time for honey harvest and/or colony swarming. Hence, adequate knowledge about bee flora species within the ecological zones including the floral calendar is a prerequisite to the successful establishment of Apiary11.

In the rain forest of south western Nigeria, the following plants were reported to be visited by honeybees. These include Cocos nucifera (Palmae), Acacia ataxacantha (Fabaceae), Abelmoschus esculentus (Malvaceae), Coffea Arabica (Rubiaceae), Hoslundia opposite (Labiatae), Aspilia Africana (Compositae), Capsicum annum (Solanaceae), Solanum melongena (Solanaceae), Theobroma cacao (Sterculiaceae) and Cucurbita maxima (Cucurbitaceae). In Nigeria, there are several reports on foraged plants of melliferous and nectivorous sources across the country. Omoloye and Akinsola14 reported on suitable and preferred honeybees plant species in south west. Also, Ayansola and Davie3 studied the food-plants of honeybees (A. mellifera andasonni ) in the rain forest and derived Savanna zones of south western Nigeria. Larinde et al.15 studied bee foraging plants and its implication on Apiary management in southern Nigeria. While Mbah and Amao6 reported 28 plant species visited by honeybees, (A. mellifera adansonii ) in Zaria (Northern Nigeria). Dukku16 identified 61 plant species visited by honeybees, Apis mellifera L. in Sudan Savanna zone of north eastern Nigeria. Beekeepers at Ejigbo and Osogbo districts lack adequate knowledge of forage plant species by honeybees in the districts which negates expected yield in relation to apiary management and flowering seasons of for age plants. Hence, the main goal of this study is to contribute to the knowledge of honeybee forage plant species of pollen and nectar sources with the aim to provides additional data on plants visited by honeybees within the identified beekeeping zones at Ejigbo and Osogbo, south western Nigeria. Thus, the objectives of this study are (i) To identify the honeybee flora in the study areas (ii) To note the flowering time of the bee flora (iii) To record visit frequencies of honeybees and compare the visitation intensity on identified plant species in both districts. The results of the study will be used to guide and make adequate recommendations on possible and preferred honeybee forage plants species to improve honey and pure beeswax production as one of the empowerments programme in the study areas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study sites: The study sites include Ejigbo district (7°54’ N, 4°18’54’’ E, 300 m above sea level) and Osogbo district (7°76’ N, 4°60’64’’ E, 336 m above sea level). Each study site was randomly sectioned into quadrats for quantitative sampling study of the forage plant communities.

Identification and monitoring of foraging activities of A. mellifera adansonii on plant species at each study sites: The identification of forage plants visited by honeybees was done through direct observations of foraging honeybee workers, with pollen loads, on flowers of identified plants. Each study site was monitored twice a week, in the morning between 8:00 am and 6:00 pm per day during the study period between, September, 2016-August, 2017.

Collections, preservation and taxonomical identification of foraged plants at each study sites: Before foraged plant collection, some plants with foraging honeybees were photographed with cybershot DSC-W220 12. The IMP digital camera and saved for presentation. Thereafter, foraged plant samples were collected on the field using sharp penknife. Each sample include a branch of the plant with the full complement of its leaves, buds and flowers. Each was placed in-between the pages of old newspaper within wooden plant press and sun and oven dried alternatively for 4-7 days for post-harvest preservation. Thereafter, at intervals of 4 weeks, all the preserved foraged plant samples were packed in labelled brown envelopes separately and forwarded for taxonomical identification by accredited and recognized herbarium of Department of Botany, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Osun state, Nigeria. This process was repeated for other samples collected throughout the study duration on both study sites. Only plants with foraging honeybees on their blossom flowers and nectar zones were collected and prepared for taxonomical identification.

Visitation intensity of A. mellifera adansonii on foraged plants: The intensity visit by A. mellifera adansonii was evaluated using Capture-Mark-Recapture method17 using insect sweep-net trap. The criteria of honeybees’ visit were restricted to (i) Pollen basket load of the hind tibia of worker honeybees (ii) Collection of nectar from flower base of observed foraged plants. Data on visit frequencies of honeybees on foraged plants were recorded.

Statistical analysis: Collected data on visitation frequencies of A. mellifera adansonii on identified foraged plants at both study sites were analyzed using students t-test with Microsoft Excel 2016 at 5% level of significance.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

At Ejigbo, a total of 17 plant species belonging to 14 families which comprised of tree crops, forest trees, root/tuber crops, herbs and shrubs were observed while 12 plant species belonging to 8 families comprising of herbs, climbers and tree were identified as bee forage plants at Osogbo (Fig. 1). The family: Asteraceae was most visited by honeybees at both study sites. The common foraged plant species across the two study sites include 8 plant species belonging to 6 families (Table 1). These include C. papaya, C. odorata, M. rhombifolia, S. scabrida, S. indica, T. triangulare, T. procumbens and Z. mays. The study observed that different plant species flowered at different period of the year across the study sites, although this was not correlated to specific yield of any beehives within the study sites. There were variations in the honeybees’ visitation rates to each plant species across study sites.

Table 1:Common foraged plant species at Ejigbo and Osogbo districts

Fig. 1:
Comparative bee foraging time on plant species at both district of Osun state, Nigeria. (Time range: Not Applicable = 0, 8.00-10.00 am = 1, 10.01-12.00 noon = 2, 12.01-2.00 pm = 3, 2.01- 4.00 pm = 4, 4.01-6.00 pm = 5)

Table 2: Visitation intensity of honeybees on plant species at Ejigbo district
+: (1-100) Occasionally visited, ++: (101–300) often visited, +++: (301-600) abundantly visited, Dry season: October-April, Rain season: May-September

Hence, some plants were occasionally visited, some were often visited while others were abundantly visited (Table 2, 3). But, there was no significant difference (t-value) (1.99) < t-table(40df.0.025) (2.02), (p>0.05) in the visitation intensity (rate of visit) on different identified foraged plant species by A. mellifera adansonii across the study sites. Plates 1-4 showed the pictures of some identified foraged plant species.

From this study, a total of 21 plant species were identified as honeybees foraged plants with nectar and pollen sources within the study duration at both districts. The categorization of these plants species into 15 families indicated the diverse nature of the natural food sources of honeybees which probably dictate the flora richness of honey produced within the study sites (Districts). Chromolaena odorate (Asteraceae), M. rhombifolia (Asteraceae), T. procumbens (Asteraceae), S. indica (Verbenaceae), S. cayennensis (Verbenaceae), A. indica (Meliaceae), C. papaya (Caricaceae), C. nitida (Sterculiaceae), C. dusenii (Lamiaceae), M. indica (Anacardiaceae), M. esculenta (Euphorbiaceae), S. dulcis, (Plantaginaceae), S. scabrida (Malvaceae), S. gilo (Solanaceae), T. triangulare (Portulacaceae), V. amygdalina (Compositae) and Z. mays (Poaceae) were identified honeybees foraged plant species at Ejigbo.

Table 3: Visitation intensity of honeybees on plant species at Osogbo district
+: (1-100) Occasionally visited, ++: (101-300) often visited, +++: (301-600) abundantly visited, Dry season: October-April, Rain season: May-September

Plate 1: Honeybee on flower of A. africana

Plate 2: Honeybee on flower of T. procumbens

Plate 3: Honeybee on flower of S. indica

Plate 4: Honeybee on flower of C. dusenii

Members of the family: Asteraceae were more abundant and frequently visited by honeybees followed by the family: Verbenaceae. While, A. africana (Asteraceae) C. papaya (Caricaceae), M. rhombifolia (Asteraceae), M. charantia (Cucurbitaceae) and T. procumbens (Asteraceae) were abundantly visited by honeybees at Osogbo. Other plant species are either often or occasionally visited. Akunne et al.18 reported that 31 families were identified attractive to honeybees in Awka (Akwa Ibom state, Nigeria) and Agulu (Anambra state, Nigeria) environs with Asteraceae (31, 25%) being the highly visited botanical family, followed by Euphorbiaceae and Verbenaceae, respectively. From literature searches and the results of this study, members of the family: Asteraceae are well patronized by honeybees than other botanical families in Nigeria. However, from this study, there was no significant difference in the visitation intensity on different identified foraged plant species by A. mellifera adansonii at both study sites. Tridax procumbens (Asteraceae) was one of the 28 forage species listed by Mbah and Amao6 in northern Nigeria and one of the 40 foraged plant species listed by Omoloye and Akinsola14. Also, in this study, T. procumbens had abundant patronage across Ejigbo and Osogbo districts, Osun state. From the results of this study and the reports of Mbah and Amao6 and Omoloye and Akinsola14, it showed that some plant species were more visited by honeybees across different ecological zones. This may probably because honeybees select and preferred to visit rewarding forage food sources within neighboring vegetative zones. In Zaria, Vernonia kotschyana (Asteraceae) was identified to be visited by honeybees as reported by Mbah and Amao6 but in this study Vernonia amygdalina was identified at Ejigbo but often visited by honeybees. Chromolaena odorata, M. indica, M. esculenta, V. amygdalina, Z. mays, A. africana, C. papaya, T. triangulare and T. procumbens were foraged by honey bees at both study sites which were also identified by Ayansola and Davies3. It is recommended that (i) Cultivation of honeybees’ preferred plant species should be encouraged around apiaries to improve annual yield of honey and other beehives’ products (ii) Further researches should be conducted to examine the possibilities of using honeybees and alternative pollinators as efficient pollinators to improve and increase crop and fruit production (iii) Creating awareness and training of beekeepers and prospective beekeepers on how to identify local suitable and preferred plant species commonly visited by honeybees to boost production of beehives’ products, hence empowering the citizenry.

CONCLUSION

The study provides additional information on foraged plants visited by honeybees both at Ejigbo and Osogbo districts, Osun state, Nigeria. Members of botanical family: Asteraceae were identified as major sources of nectars and pollens identified in Osun state, Nigeria. Visitation intensity rate of honeybees depends on quantum of pollen or nectar reward from individual plants visited.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

Honeys are nutritious products, mainly composed of carbohydrates, from honeybees, Apis mellifera adansonii, which are widely consumed as food globally and are also major ingredients in preparation of many Pharmaceutical products such as cough syrup. This study on bees foraged plants provide some lists of plant species and their botanical families within Osun state, Nigeria. These identified foraged plant species are sources of food for honeybees from which honey are produced and stored in honeycombs within beehives in the region. The richness of honey produced in specific regions is dictated by botanical and vegetational foraging sources which could be exploited for Apitherapy and health medication.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors appreciate Laboratory superintendents, College of Agriculture, Ejigbo, Osun state, for their assistance. Special thanks to Dr. M. Jimoh of Department of Plant Biology, Osun State University, Osobgo, Osun state, for the assistance rendered in the preservation of Plant samples from the field. We also acknowledge the Herbarium Unit of Department of Botany, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-ife, Osun state, Nigeria, on identification of the plant species.

REFERENCES
1:  Oduntan, C., 1999. The Practice of Beekeeping. Bee Craft Publishers, Abeokuta, Page: 110.

2:  Morse, R.A. and N.W. Calderone, 2000. The Value of Honeybees as Pollinators of US Crops. Bee Culture Magazine, A.I. Root Company, Medina, OH., USA., pp: 31.

3:  Ayansola, A.A. and B.A. Davies, 2012. Honeybee floral resources in Southwestern Nigeria. J. Biol. Life Sci., 3: 127-139.

4:  Adekanmbi, O. and O. Ogundipe, 2009. Nectar sources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera adansonii) revealed by pollen content. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 37: 211-217.
Direct Link  |  

5:  Nnamani, C.V. and A.N. Uguru, 2012. Genetic diversity of honey producing plants underchanging climate in Southern Nigeria: Need for conservation to improve food security and livelihood option. Proceedings of the Ruforum 3rd Biennial Conferences, September 24-28, 2012, Entebbe, Uganda, pp: 1455-1458.

6:  Mbah, C.E. and A.O. Amao, 2009. Natural foods and feeding habits of the African honey bee Apis mellifera adansonii Latrielle (1804) in Zaria, Northern Nigeria. Sci. World J., 4: 11-14.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

7:  Ebenezer, I.O. and M.T. Olugbenga, 2010. Pollen characterisation of honey samples from north central Nigeria. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 43-47.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

8:  Abdullahi, G., H. Sule, I.A. Chimoya and M.D. Isah, 2011. Diversity and relative distribution of honeybees foraging plants in some selected reserves in Mubi Region, Sudan Savannah ecological zone of Nigeria. Adv. Applied Sci. Res., 2: 388-395.
Direct Link  |  

9:  Gezahegn, T., 2007. Adaptation trial of honey plants: Adaptability trials of temperate honey plants in Ethiopia. Ethiopian Beekeepers Assoc. Newslett., 5: 16-17.

10:  Akratanakul, P., 1990. Beekeeping in Asia. FAO (Foods and Agricultural Organization of theUnited Nation) Agricultural Services Bulletin No. 68/4, Italy, pp: 160.

11:  Bista, S. and G.P. Shivakoti, 2001. Honeybee flora at Kabre, Dolakha district. Nepal Agric. Res. J., 4: 18-25.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

12:  Sanford, M.T., 2003. Beekeeping: Florida Bee Botany. Institute of Food and Agricultural Science, Extension, University of Florida, USA., pp: 686-690.

13:  Delaphane, S., J. McLaurin and P.A. Thomas, 2010. Bee pollination of georgia crop plants. University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Bulletin No. 1106, pp: 16.

14:  Omoloye, A.A. and P.A. Akinsola, 2006. Foraging Sources and Effects of Selected Plant Characters and Weather Variables on the Visitation Intensity of Honeybee, Apis mellifera adansonii (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in the Southwest Nigeria. J. Apic. Sci., 50: 51-60.

15:  Larinde, S.L., G.A. Adedeji and E. Ogbuehi, 2014. Bee foraging plants in selected ecological zones in Southern Nigeria: Implication for apiary management. J. Trop. For. Res., 30: 109-118.

16:  Dukku, U.H., 2013. Identification of plants visited by the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. in the Sudan Savanna zone of Northeastern Nigeria. Afr. J. Plant Sci., 7: 273-284.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

17:  Petersen, C.G.J., 1986. The yearly immigration of young plaice into Limfjord from the German sea, etc. Rept. Danish Biol., 6: 1-48.
Direct Link  |  

18:  Akunne, C.E., A.U. Akpan and B.U. Ononye, 2016. A checklist of nectariferous and polleniferous plants of African honeybees (Apis mellifera adansonii L.) in Awka, Nigeria. J. Apicult., 31: 379-387.

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved