Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article

Potassium and Phosphorus Releasing Capacity of Latosols under Tea Cultivation in South India

S. Venkatesan and V.K. Senthurpandian
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail

Potassium and phosphorus releasing capacity of tea soils were studied by collecting soil samples from sixteen agro climatic zones of south Indian tea growing areas. A drastic reduction in potassium release was noted even at the second extraction uniformly in all zones which confirms the fact that there is no binding site for potassium in tea soils of south India. The total releasable potassium was generally found higher in various zones of Munnar and Nilgiris region. The phosphorus release decreased gradually with successive extractions and attained a constant value during eighth or ninth extractions. The Cobb-Douglas equation worked out for potassium release indicated that the Latosols of south India could be grouped under highly responsive to medium responsive category towards externally applied potassium. The values of `a` is the measure of degree of steepness of nutrient release from soil, which was lower for phosphorus release when compared to that of potassium. Unlike in the case of potassium no drastic reduction in phosphorus release was noted due to successive extraction.

Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

  How to cite this article:

S. Venkatesan and V.K. Senthurpandian, 2006. Potassium and Phosphorus Releasing Capacity of Latosols under Tea Cultivation in South India. International Journal of Soil Science, 1: 227-234.

DOI: 10.3923/ijss.2006.227.234



During 1940s the existence of tea was threatened in south India by wide spread defoliation, debilitation and incidence of red rust. The responsible factor was identified as potassium deficiency. Since then the potassium nutrition is considered to be an important aspect for tea cultivation as much as nitrogen fertilization. The tea soils are highly withered and having kaolinite clay minerals, where there is hardly any binding site for potassium, which necessitated frequent application of potassic fertilizers (Venkatesan and Murugesan, 2006).

On the other hand tea flush shoots contain 0.24-0.32% P (Verma and Venkatesan, 2001) and hence a tea field yielding around 3000 kg of made tea per hectare per annum removes approximately 7 to 10 kg of phosphorus every year despite the retention of a considerable quantity of this nutrient through prunings and leaf litter. The removal of phosphorus is far less than the quantity removed in the case of nitrogen or potassium. Application of phosphorus in high doses in alternate years in the tea fields of south India when relatively small quantity of the element is removed unveils the fact that most of applied phosphorus is rendered unavailable to the plant system. The P fixing capacity is well recognized and documented under south Indian conditions (Ranganathan, 1976; Venkatesan and Murugesan, 2004). Although many studies have been carried out on potassium and phosphorus releasing capacity of different soils (McDowell and Sharpley, 2002; Elrashidi et al., 2003; Srinivasa Rao et al., 2003; Mittal et al., 2000), the relevant informations available on the tea growing soils are generally very much limited and particularly not available in the Latosols of south India, where the cultivation practices are unique. It is known that apart from fertilizers non-exchangeable K and P become the major source for K and P needs of tea. Therefore, characterization of soil reserve K and P and their release pattern are important as for as nutrition is concerned. The present study aims to examine the K and P release characteristics of tea soils.

Materials and Methods

Four major tea growing regions viz. Anamallais, Munnar, Nilgiris and Vandiperiyar were selected for this study. They were further divided into sixteen different agro climatic zones based on their difference in elevation, annual precipitation, temperature and physical properties of soils. From each zone, 15 to 20 soil samples were taken by using a sampling auger. The individual soil samples collected from a particular zone were mixed together by hand on a polythene sheet. The bulk quantity of the sample collected was reduced to one-third of its volume by quartering method. In the similar manner sampling was done from four different areas. The samples were air dried and passed through 2 mm sieve. The soil samples were analysed for pH, electrical conductivity, organic matter, phosphorus, potassium, bulk density, sand, silt, clay, ammonium-N and nitrate-N using standard methodologies (Subba Rao, 2001). The results are provided in Table 1.

To study the potassium release characteristics of 16 different soils, 5 g of each soil was placed in wide mouth plastic bottles, to which 25 mL of 1 N ammonium acetate was added (Hanway and Heidal, 1952). All the shaking bottles were shaken over the horizontal shaker for five minutes and filtered through whatmann No. 1 filter paper. After collecting the filtrate, 25 mL of 1 N ammonium acetate was added to the same soil to collect data on potassium content due to second extraction. Similar kind of operation was carried out 10 times consecutively using the soil. The potassium in the filtrate was estimated using Sherwood (model 410) flame photometer.

Similarly, 5 g of soil from each zone was weighed and shaken along with 25 mL of Bray II modified extractant solution for five minutes using a horizontal shaker (Bray and Kurtz, 1945). The same soil was extracted repeatedly with fresh extractant each time. After carrying out the operations for 10 times, the phosphorus content available in the filtrate was estimated using ammonium molybdate method at 882 nm (UV Visible spectrophotometer model 918, GBC software controlled). The cumulative release of both potassium and phosphorus were fitted with Cobb-Douglas exponential function (Y = axb).

Table 1: Physico-chemical properties of tea soils
Image for - Potassium and Phosphorus Releasing Capacity of Latosols under Tea Cultivation in South India

Where Y = Cumulative nutrient
  a = Degree of steepness of nutrient release
  x = No. of extractions
  b = Exponential constant

Results and Discussion

Extractable Potassium and Phosphorus
The data generated on potassium release due to extraction of soil with 1 N ammonium acetate K is provided in Table 2. The table indicates that the extractable potassium decreased gradually and obtained a constant value at the seventh extraction in the case of all zones of Anamallais and Munnar and Coonoor zone of Nilgiris region.

Table 2: I N Ammonium acetate releasable K and cumulative K of tea soils in south India
Image for - Potassium and Phosphorus Releasing Capacity of Latosols under Tea Cultivation in South India

Table 3: Bray II modified releasable P and cumulative P of tea soils of south India
Image for - Potassium and Phosphorus Releasing Capacity of Latosols under Tea Cultivation in South India

In other zones of Nilgiris and Vandiperiyar region, the constant value was attained at eighth or ninth extraction. Similar observations were reported by Sharma and Swami (2000) and Pal and Mukhopadhyoy (1992) in various other soils. A drastic reduction in extractable potassium was noted in the second extraction itself, uniformly in all the zones, which confirms the fact that there are no binding sites for potassium in the tea soils of south India (Ranganathan, 1976). Western end zone of Munnar released maximum amount of potassium (415 mg kg-1) during the first extraction while, it was Elappara zone of Vandiperiyar, which released lowest potassium (150 mg kg-1). Even though the soils of Munnar showed higher initial concentration after sixth extraction, the concentration of potassium was almost similar to other regions.

The phosphorus release decreased gradually with successive extractions and finally attained a constant value during eighth or ninth extractions. Unlike in the case of potassium there was no drastic reduction in phosphorus due to successive extraction. Eastern facing zone of Anamallais exhibited higher phosphorus (110 mg kg-1), while Eastern end zone of Munnar recorded lowest P (39 mg kg-1) in the first extraction (Table 3).

Cumulative K and P
The cumulative potassium is calculated by adding K released in the previous extractions with that of the particular extraction. The cumulative K increased linearly initially and then became a curve linear. The total releasable potassium of individual zones was calculated by adding potassium content estimated in all the ten extractions. It is an important parameter, which could be considered as the measure of potassium availability index of tea soils. It varied between 322 and 445 mg kg-1 in Anamallais, 443 and 627 mg kg-1 in Munnar, 371 and 703 mg kg-1 in Nilgiris and 241 and 418 mg kg-1 in Vandiperiyar. In general the total releasable K was higher in the case of various zones of Munnar and Nilgiris regions. It is interesting to note that among various regions, Munnar and Nilgiris were located at higher elevations possessing higher organic matter (Table 1), where the releasable potassium was also higher.

The total extractable phosphorus due to ten consecutive extractions varied between 312 and 417 mg kg-1 in Anamallais, 205 and 418 mg kg-1 in Munnar 180 and 264 mg kg-1 in Nilgiris and 285 and 379 mg kg-1 in Vandiperiyar. Among all the regions even though the number of zones are higher in Nilgiris, the variation in phosphorus content was very low.

The cumulative K was plotted against the corresponding extractions with 1 N ammonium acetate using Cobb-Douglas exponential function (Fig. 1). The exponential models are given in Table 4. In the Cobb-Douglas equation ‘a’ is recognised as the measure of degree of steepness of nutrient release from soil. According to Aruna et al. (2001) lower the ‘a’ value, lower will be the release of nutrients from the soil and hence the response to soil applied fertilizer would be maximum and vice versa. Among the three zones studied in Anamallais region, based on the ‘a’ values, it could be classified that the soils of Intermediate zone are most responsive followed by the Western facing and Eastern facing zones towards the externally applied potassium. In Munnar region, the Western end soil fell in least responsive category while the other zones are equally responsive. A vast deviation in ‘a’ value was noted in the soils of Nilgiris region, which ranged between 276 and 494.

Table 4: Response of tea soils to potassium and phosphorus application
Image for - Potassium and Phosphorus Releasing Capacity of Latosols under Tea Cultivation in South India
HR-Highly Responsive; R-Responsive; PR-Poor Responsive; NR-Non responsive

Image for - Potassium and Phosphorus Releasing Capacity of Latosols under Tea Cultivation in South India
Fig. 1: Number of extractions with 1 N NH4OAc. A-Anamallais, M-Munnar, N-Nilgiris, V-Vandiperiyar

Based on ‘a’ value it could be concluded that the soils of Kotagiri and Kullakamby are very much responsive to potassium fertilizer application when compared to Kundah and Coonoor zones. The soils of Ooty zone are capable of releasing nutrients on its own for a long period and hence were the least responsive. On reviewing the data on soil physical parameters it is found that both Ooty and Western end zones have recorded maximum organic matter content. Since there are no binding sites for potassium in kaolinite soils, it is concluded that the high potassium release capacity could be attributed to the richer organic matter content. Positive and significant correlations have already been reported under various cultivation practices Ahmed and Walia (1999), Singh et al. (1999) and Boruah and Nath (1992). The Elappara zone of ‘a’ Vandiperiyar has recorded least value of ‘a’ and hence very much demanding to fertilizer application when compared to other two zones.

The cumulative phosphorus increased linearly first then took a slow pace. The cumulative phosphorus was plotted against the corresponding extractions and provided in Fig. 2, which indicated a linear increase at first and then become curvilinear. The Cobb-Douglas equations obtained from phosphorus releasing capacity of various tea soils are provided in Table 4. The ‘a’ values are very much lower when compared to those due to potassium release, which indicates that the response to phosphorus application will generally be higher than that of potassium application. This could be because the phosphorus availability is strongly influenced by acidity of the soils (Ryan et al., 2001; McDowell and Sharpley, 2002). Since tea soils are acidic, the release of phosphorus from the labile pool is harder and harder.

Image for - Potassium and Phosphorus Releasing Capacity of Latosols under Tea Cultivation in South India
Fig. 2: Number of extractions with bray II modified solution. A-Anamallais, M-Munnar, N-Nilgiris, V-Vandiperiyar

Among various zones of Anamallais, Eastern and Western facing zones were least responsive when compared to the soils of Intermediate zone. In Munnar the a value ranged between 53 and 101, which indicate a wider variation in the release of phosphorus in tea soils. The release was maximum in Plateau zone and minimum in Top station zone, as evidenced by higher and lower ‘a’ value, respectively. Except in Kotagiri in the Nilgiris region, all other zones are highly responsive towards phosphorus application. Remarkable difference in ‘a’ was noted in Vandiperiyar region. Peermade zone had maximum ‘a’ value followed by Elappara zone.


Since majority of tea growing areas fell either in highly responsive or in responsive categories towards externally applied phosphorus and potassium, the frequency of fertilizer application shall be increased to enhance the agronomic efficiency. Although current study has dealt with only two of the several nutrients, the study can be taken as a model for the other nutrients.


  1. Ahmed, N. and C.S. Walia, 1999. Profile distribution of various forms of potassium in some landforms of Bundelkhand region. J. Potassium Res., 15: 1-4.

  2. Aruna, L., N.D. Muthiah and R. Mohan, 2001. Zinc release characteristics of major rice soil series of Tamil Nadu. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 49: 348-350.
    Direct Link  |  

  3. Boruah, H.C. and A.K. Nath, 1992. Potassium status in three major soil orders of Assam. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 40: 559-561.

  4. Bray, R.H. and L.T. Kurtz, 1945. Determination of total, organic and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci., 59: 39-46.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

  5. Eirashidi, M.A., M.D. Mays and P.E. Jones, 2003. A technique to estimate release characteristics and runoff phosphorus for agricultural land. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 34: 1759-1790.
    Direct Link  |  

  6. Hanway, J.J. and H. Heidal, 1952. Soil analysis methods used in Iowa state soil testing lab. Agronomy, 57: 1-31.

  7. McDowell, R. and A. Sharpley, 2002. Availability of residual phosphorus in high phosphorus soil. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal., 33: 1235-1246.
    Direct Link  |  

  8. Mittal, S.B., S.C. Mehta and F.N. Ponnamperuma, 2000. Non-exchangeable potassium release from some paddy soils of Sri Lanka. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 48: 469-472.
    Direct Link  |  

  9. Pal, S.K. and A.K. Mukhopadhyay, 1992. Potassium status in some Inceptisols of West Bengal. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 40: 562-565.

  10. Ryan, P.R., E. Delhaize and D.L. Jones, 2001. Function and mechanism of organic exudation from plant roots. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., 52: 527-560.
    Direct Link  |  

  11. Sharma, R.R. and B.N. Swami, 2000. Studies on kinetics of potassium release in surface horizons of three soil series of Rajasthan. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 48: 472-477.

  12. Singh, S.P., J. Ram, N. Singh and D. Sarkar, 1999. Distribution of potassium in soils of Arunachal Pradesh. J. Potassium Res., 15: 15-24.

  13. Srinivasarao, Ch., A.N. Ganeshamurthy, A. Masood, R.N. Singh and K.K. Singh, 2003. Potassium releasing power of different soil types in pulse-growing regions of India. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 51: 312-315.
    Direct Link  |  

  14. Subba Rao, A., 2001. Analysis of Soils for Available Major Nutrients. In: Methods of Analysis of Soils, Plants, Waters and Fertiliser, Tandon, H.L.S. (Ed.). Fertiliser Association and Consultation Organization, New Delhi, pp: 13-35

  15. Venkatesan, S. and S. Murugesan, 2004. Phosphorus fixing capacity of tea soils of Anamallais and Nilgiris. J. Plantation Crops., 32: 63-67.

  16. Venkatesan, S. and S. Murugesan, 2006. Influence of tea cultivation on soil characteristics with special reference to potassium. Int. J. Soil Sci., 1: 58-63.
    CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

  17. Verma, D.P. and S. Venkatesan, 2001. Organic manures in tea. The Planters Chronicle, 97: 111-119.

  18. Ranganathan, V., 1976. Tea soils of South India with reference to nutritional and manuring problems. Handbook of Tea Culture, UPASI Tea Research Institute: Valparai, Tamil Nadu. Section, 11.

©  2022 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved