Subscribe Now Subscribe Today
Research Article
 

Enhancement of Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient for Oxygen Transfer Using Fe2O3-Water Nanofluids



S. Manikandan, N. Karthikeyan, K.S. Suganthi and K.S. Rajan
 
Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
ABSTRACT

Experiments were carried out with Fe2O3-water nanofluids to study possible enhancement in volumetric mass transfer coefficient for transfer of oxygen from air bubble to nanofluid, in an agitated, aerated bioreactor. The nanoparticles concentration was varied in the range of 0.022 to 0.065 wt.%, while the reactor was operated at three operating conditions viz. 200 rpm and 1.5 L min-1 of air flow, 100 rpm and 1.5 L min-1 of air flow and 200 rpm and 0.75 L min-1 of air flow. Nanoparticles were found to contribute to enhance oxygen transfer through ‘grazing effect’. An enhancement of 63% was observed for 0.065 wt.% Fe2O3-water operated at 200 rpm and 0.75 L min-1 air flow.

Services
Related Articles in ASCI
Search in Google Scholar
View Citation
Report Citation

 
  How to cite this article:

S. Manikandan, N. Karthikeyan, K.S. Suganthi and K.S. Rajan, 2012. Enhancement of Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient for Oxygen Transfer Using Fe2O3-Water Nanofluids. Asian Journal of Scientific Research, 5: 271-277.

DOI: 10.3923/ajsr.2012.271.277

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ajsr.2012.271.277
 
Received: February 08, 2012; Accepted: February 13, 2012; Published: May 21, 2012



INTRODUCTION

Nanofluids are colloidal suspensions of nanoparticles of the size 1-100 nm in a base fluid (Choi, 1995). Addition of nanoparticles to a liquid increases its thermal conductivity and viscosity. Since thermal management is conceived as the major application of nanofluids, thermal conductivity enhancement in nanofluids has been widely studied as evident from reviews (Wang and Mujumdar, 2007; Li and Kleinstreuer, 2008; Bahrami et al., 2007; Yu et al., 2008; Murshed et al., 2008). Relatively fewer studies have focused on viscosity increase (Nguyen et al., 2008; Ko et al., 2007; Phuoc and Massoudi, 2009; Chen et al., 2007; Garg et al., 2009). In aerobic bioreactors, oxygen mass transfer is rate-limiting, compared to oxygen consumption by the microorganisms. Lower oxygen mass transfer rate is attributed to lower solubility of oxygen in water and hence the emphasis is on the improvement of oxygen transfer rate from the air bubble to fermentation broth. This may be achieved by use of surfactants or other additives including fine/ultra-fine particles. This work focuses on the role of Fe2O3 nanoparticles in enhancing the volumetric mass coefficient in an agitated, aerated bioreactor.

Kars et al. (1979) discovered ‘grazing effect’, a mechanism by which fine particles in suspension adsorb solute from the gas and rapidly transfer the same to liquid. Zhou et al. (2003) proposed that the mass transfer coefficient may be increased or decreased due to the presence of particles, depending on the dominant of two events: (1) decrease in film thickness due to shearing action by the particles (2) lowering of diffusion coefficient of gas in the liquid owing to increase in viscosity of liquid due to addition of particles. The first study on use of nanoparticles for mass transfer application seems to be the work of Wen et al. (2005) who investigated the gas–liquid mass transfer in internal loop airlift reactor in the presence of nanoparticles. A strong influence of nanometer sized particles on mass transfer was observed. Krishnamurthy et al. (2006) observed more than one order of magnitude increase in dye diffusion rate using 0.5 vol.% 20 nm Al2O3-water nanofluids, compared to that of water. Olle et al. (2006) observed 600% improvement in gas-liquid oxygen mass transfer rate with Fe3O4-water nanofluids in an agitated, sparged reactor at nanoparticle concentrations below 1 wt.%. The influence of CuO, Cu, Al2O3 nanoparticles on the absorption of ammonia by binary fluid (ammonia-water mixture) has been reported, where in the use of 0.1 wt.% Cu-binary nanofluid led to 321% enhancement in the absorption of ammonia (Kim et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2007). Contrary to the earlier reports on the enhancement of mass transfer due to addition of nanoparticles in an absorption solvent, the non-adsorbing, viscoelastic colloidal silica solution showed lower mass transfer rate and mass transfer coefficient for absorption of CO2 in 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol compared with pure solvent (Park et al., 2006; Park et al., 2008). Kang et al. (2008) reported enhancement in vapor absorption rate by incorporating iron nanoparticles or carbon nanotubes in H2O/LiBr binary liquid. Vapor absorption rate with 0.1 wt.% CNT was found to be 2.48 times the absorption rate without nanotubes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of nanofluids: Iron oxide nanoparticles (α-Fe2O3, 20-50 nm spheres) were purchased from Nanostructured and Amorphous Materials Inc., USA. The nanoparticles, as received were in aggregated form and must be dispersed using milling or probe ultrasonication, as per the guidelines provided by the supplier. A custom-made stirred bead mill was used for dispersing Fe2O3 in water at a pH of 8.5. This was followed by dilution to obtain nanofluids of appropriate concentration.

Characterization of nanofluids: The average particle size was determined by Laser Diffraction studies using a particle size analyzer (Blue Wave, Microtrac, Japan). The crystalline/amorphous nature of the as-procured Fe2O3 and the milled powders were ascertained using a X-ray diffractometer (D8 Focus, Bruker, Germany). The zeta potential of the nanofluid was determined using a Zetasizer (Nano-ZS, Malvern Instruments, USA). The Viscosity of nanofluids was measured using a viscometer (LVDV II+ Pro, Brookfield Engineering, USA) using an Ultra-low (UL) adaptor with spindle, S00.

Measurement of kLa in stirred tank reactor: Successful enhancements in mass transfer have been reported with nanofluids containing less than 1 wt.% nanoparticles (Krishnamurthy et al., 2006; Olle et al., 2006; Kim et al., 2006). The viscoelastic nature of 31 wt.% SiO2-water solution was vastly responsible for reduced ‘kLa’ for CO2 absorption in the study of Park et al. (2006). Hence, experiments were designed in the present study, to utilize very low concentrations of Fe2O3-water nanofluids, such that the rheological characteristics of nanofluid are not much different from that of water. The maximum nanoparticles concentration employed here is 0.065 wt.% and hence the viscosity of Fe2O3-water nanofluids and that of water would not be much different.

Measurement of ‘kLa’ was carried out in a stirred tank bench-top fermentor (BIOFLOW 115, New Brunswick, USA). The fermentor is equipped with sensors for monitoring Dissolved Oxygen (DO), pH and temperature. Air at a controlled flow rate can be supplied through a sparger located below the impeller. In a typical experiment, 1.5-L of Fe2O3-water nanofluid was taken in the fermentor followed by the calibration of DO probe at the required air flow rate and impeller speed. The system was deoxygenated by the addition of sodium sulphite with gentle agitation. Once the percentage oxygen saturation was close to minimum, addition of sodium sulphite was stopped. This was taken as the initial percentage saturation. Air at the required flow rate was supplied, which results in oxygen absorption by nanofluid and hence, an increase in percentage saturation. The percentage saturation was measured at regular intervals of time, till a plateau in percentage saturation was obtained, from which ‘kLa’ was determined.

RESULTS

Characteristics of nanofluid: The average particle size, as determined by Laser Diffraction (LD), was found to be 120 nm. X-ray diffraction studies revealed the amorphous nature of milled-powders, though as-purchased Fe2O3 was crystalline. The zeta potential of nanofluid was determined to be -24.3 mV and nanofluids remained stable for more than a week. The viscosity of nanofluids increased linearly with nanoparticle concentration (data not shown for brevity), with the viscosity of 1.3 wt.% Fe2O3-water nanofluid being 7% higher than that of water.

Influence of nanoparticles mass percentage on percentage saturation: The comparison of percentage saturation-time data for pure water and that of Fe2O3-water nanofluids of different nanoparticles mass concentration is shown in Fig. 1 for the reactor operating conditions of 200 rpm and 0.75 L min-1 of air flow. It is evident from Fig. 1 that the percentage saturation increases rapidly with time for Fe2O3-water nanofluids compared to that of pure water. This was observed for all the operating conditions investigated, though data are not presented to maintain brevity. This observation hints at enhanced transfer of oxygen from air to Fe2O3-water nanofluids compared to that of pure water.

Influence of nanoparticles concentration on kLa: Volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa) is normally used in the analysis of mass transport in bioprocess systems. This circumvents the need for the measurement of mass transfer coefficient (kL) and interfacial area (a) separately and hence used as a convenient parameter for design, analysis and scale up of bioreactor systems.

Image for - Enhancement of Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient for Oxygen Transfer Using Fe2O3-Water Nanofluids
Fig. 1: Influence of nanofluids on percentage saturation for reactor operated at 200 rpm and 0.75 L min-1

The volumetric mass transfer coefficient (kLa) can be obtained from percentage saturation-time data by static method using the following equation:

Image for - Enhancement of Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient for Oxygen Transfer Using Fe2O3-Water Nanofluids
(1)

Where:

C0 = Oxygen concentration in terms of percentage saturation at the beginning of oxygen supply (%)
Ct = Oxygen concentration in terms of percentage saturation at any time (%)
C8 = Oxygen concentration in terms of percentage saturation at the end of oxygen supply (%)
kLa = Volumetric mass transfer coefficient (min-1)
t = Time (min)
a = Interfacial area (m2)

The volumetric mass transfer coefficient determined from Eq. 1 for different operating conditions and nanoparticles concentration is shown in Fig. 2. An increase in volumetric mass transfer coefficient with increase in nanoparticles concentration can be observed for the two operating conditions: 100 rpm and 1.5 L min-1 and 200 rpm and 0.75 L min-1. When the reactor was operated at 200 rpm with 1.5 L min-1 of air flow, there seems to be an optimum nanoparticles concentration at which the ‘kLa’ was maximum. However, for all the operating conditions, ‘kLa’ using nanofluids was higher than those with water, indicating enhancement in ‘kLa’ for all the cases. At the highest nanoparticles concentration, ‘kLa’ is independent of operating conditions.

Influence of nanoparticles concentration on effective volumetric mass transfer coefficient: Effective volumetric mass transfer coefficient (E) is defined as the ratio of volumetric mass transfer coefficient obtained with nanofluids to the volumetric mass transfer coefficient obtained with pure water (Olle et al., 2006). This parameter is an indicator of enhancement in mass transfer coefficient. Figure 3 shows the influence of nanoparticles mass percentage on ‘E’ at two different operating conditions. It can be observed from Fig. 3 that the effective kLa increases with nanoparticles mass concentration. An effective kLa of 1.63 has been obtained for 0.065 wt.% Fe2O3-water nanofluids at 200 rpm and 0.75 L min-1 air flow, representing 63% enhancement in oxygen transfer from gas to liquid using these nanofluids. It is also evident that the nanoparticles are more effective in enhancing ‘kLa’ at lower air flow rate.

Image for - Enhancement of Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient for Oxygen Transfer Using Fe2O3-Water Nanofluids
Fig. 2: Influence of nanoparticles mass concentration on kLa

Image for - Enhancement of Volumetric Mass Transfer Coefficient for Oxygen Transfer Using Fe2O3-Water Nanofluids
Fig. 3: Influence of nanoparticles mass concentration on enhancement in kLa

DISCUSSION

An enhancement in volumetric mass transfer coefficient may be attributed to either an increase in mass transfer coefficient (kL) or an increase in interfacial area (a) or both (Olle et al., 2006). In gas-liquid mass transfer operations, the total surface area of all the bubbles is taken as interfacial area. Hence, higher number of smaller bubbles provides higher interfacial area as compared to lower number of larger bubbles. In a stirred tank reactor, bubbles are broken upon contact with impeller, leading to higher number of small bubbles, irrespective of bubble size at the sparger. This is evident from the correlations for ‘kLa’ proposed in the literature for stirred tank reactors that do not take into account of bubble diameter or bubble frequency. Hence, change in interfacial area (a) due to the use of nanofluids can be expected to be negligible. Also, the physical properties of such low concentration nanofluid systems do not differ appreciably from that of base fluid and hence, this enhancement in a stirred tank reactor cannot be explained by traditional theories of gas-liquid mass transfer.

While searching for a plausible mechanism for this enhancement, we wish to recall the following significant conclusions of earlier investigations on mass transfer studies using nanofluids: Krishnamurthy et al. (2006) attributed the mass transfer enhancement to ‘nanoscale stirring’ of the liquid by Brownian motion. The role of ‘nanoscale stirring’ in an agitated aerated reactor may be negligible owing to the prevalence of highly turbulent environment. Under these circumstances, either grazing effect or reduction in film thickness by shearing action may be responsible for the observed enhancement.

Fluid-solid interactions are influenced largely by surface area of particles (Rajan et al., 2006; Rajan et al., 2007; Rajan et al., 2008). The nanoparticles utilized in the present study had BET surface area of 30 m2 g-1, which is sufficient for reasonable adsorption rates. The higher effectiveness of nanofluids in increasing ‘kLa’ at lower air flow rate (from Fig. 3), along with a constant ‘kLa’ at highest nanoparticles concentration (from Fig. 2), suggest that a nanoparticles concentration-dependent phenomenon plays a role in oxygen mass transfer. Hence, the enhancements in ‘kLa’ of the present study may be attributed to ‘grazing effect’ of nanoparticles.

CONCLUSIONS

Stable Fe2O3-water nanofluids were prepared by stirred bead milling and utilized for study of mass transfer of oxygen from air to nanofluid in an agitated, aerated bioreactor. Enhancement in oxygen mass transfer was observed for all concentrations of Fe2O3-water nanofluids as observed from percentage saturation-time data and volumetric mass transfer coefficient. The maximum kLa enhancement of 63% has been obtained at the reactor operating condition of 200 rpm and 0.75 L min-1 of air flow for 0.065 wt.% Fe2O3-water nanofluid. The mass transfer enhancement is attributed to ‘grazing effect’.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was supported by (1) PG teaching grant No: SR/NM/PG-16/2007 of Nano Mission Council, Department of Science and Technology (DST), India (2) Grant No: SR/FT/ET-061/2008, DST, India and (3) Research and Modernization Project #1, SASTRA University, India. The authors thank SASTRA University for the infrastructural support extended during the work.

REFERENCES

1:  Bahrami, M., M. Yovanovich and R. Culham, 2007. Assessment of relevant physical phenomena controlling thermal performance of Nanofluids. J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer, 21: 673-680.
CrossRef  |  

2:  Chen, H., Y. Ding and C. Tan, 2007. Rheological behavior of nanofluids. New J. Phys., 9: 367-367.
CrossRef  |  

3:  Choi, S.U.S. and J.A. Eastman, 1995. Enhancing thermal conductivity of fluids with nanoparticles. Proceedings of the International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, November 12-17, 1995, San Francisco, CA., USA., pp: 99-105
Direct Link  |  

4:  Garg, P., J.L. Alvarado, C. Marsh, T.A. Carlson, D.A. Kessler and K. Annamalai, 2009. An experimental study on the effect of ultrasonication on viscosity and heat transfer performance of multi-wall carbon nanotube-based aqueous nanofluids. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 52: 5090-5101.
CrossRef  |  

5:  Kang, Y.T., H.J. Kim and K.I. Lee, 2008. Heat and mass transfer enhancement of binary nanofluids for H2O/LiBr falling film absorption process. Int. J. Refrig., 31: 850-856.
CrossRef  |  

6:  Kars, R.L., R.J. Best and A.A.H. Drinkenburg, 1979. The sorption of propane in slurries of active carbon in water. Chem. Eng. J., 17: 201-210.
CrossRef  |  

7:  Kim, J.K., J.Y. Jung and Y.T. Kang, 2006. The effect of nano-particles on the bubble absorption performance in a binary nanofluid. Int. J. Refrig., 29: 22-29.
CrossRef  |  

8:  Kim, J.K., J.Y. Jung and Y.T. Kang, 2007. Absorption performance enhancement by nano-particles and chemical surfactants in binary nanofluids. Int. J. Refrig., 30: 50-57.

9:  Ko, G.H., K. Heo, K. Lee, D.S. Kim, C. Kim, Y. Sohn and M. Choi, 2007. An experimental study on the pressure drop of nanofluids containing carbon nanotubes in a horizontal tube. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 50: 4749-4753.
CrossRef  |  

10:  Krishnamurthy, S., P. Bhattacharya, P.E. Phelan and R.S. Prasher, 2006. Enhanced mass transport in nanofluids. Nano Lett., 6: 419-423.
CrossRef  |  

11:  Li, J. and C. Kleinstreuer, 2008. Thermal performance of nanofluid flow in microchannels. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 29: 1221-1232.
CrossRef  |  

12:  Murshed, S.M.S., K.C. Leong and C. Yang, 2008. Thermophysical and electrokinetic properties of nanofluids: A critical review. Appl. Therm. Eng., 28: 17-18.

13:  Nguyen, C.T., F. Desgranges, N. Galanis, G. Roy, T. Mare, S. Boucher and H.A. Minsta, 2008. Viscosity data for Al2O3-water nanofluid-hysteresis: Is heat transfer enhancement using nanofluids reliable?. Int. J. Therm. Sci., 47: 103-111.
CrossRef  |  

14:  Olle, B., S. Bucak, T.C. Holmes, L. Bromberg, T.A. Hatton and D.I.C. Wang, 2006. Enhancement of oxygen mass transfer using functionalized magnetic nanoparticles. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45: 4355-4363.
CrossRef  |  

15:  Park, S.W., B.S. Choi and J.W. Lee, 2006. Effect of elasticity of aqueous colloidal silica solution on chemical absorption of carbon dioxide with 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol. Korea-Aust. Rheol. J., 18: 133-141.
Direct Link  |  

16:  Park, S.W., B.S. Choi, S.S. Kim, B.D. Lee and J.W. Lee, 2008. Absorption of carbon dioxide into aqueous colloidal silica solution with diisopropanolamine. J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 14: 166-174.
CrossRef  |  

17:  Phuoc, T.X. and M. Massoudi, 2009. Experimental observations of the effects of shear rates and particle concentration on the viscosity of Fe2O3-deionized water nanofluids. Int. J. Therm. Sci., 48: 1294-1301.
CrossRef  |  

18:  Rajan, K.S., K. Dhasandhan, S.N. Srivastava and B. Pitchumani, 2008. Studies on gas-solid heat transfer during pneumatic conveying. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 51: 2801-2813.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

19:  Rajan, K.S., S.N. Srivastava, B. Pitchumani and B. Mohanty, 2006. Simulation of gas-solid heat transfer during pneumatic conveying: Use of multiple gas inlets along the duct. Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 33: 1234-1242.
CrossRef  |  

20:  Wang, X.Q. and A.S. Mujumdar, 2007. Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: A review. Int. J. Therm. Sci., 46: 1-19.
CrossRef  |  

21:  Wen, J., X. Jia and W. Feng, 2005. Hydrodynamic and mass transfer of gas-liquid-solid three-phase internal loop airlift reactors with nanometer sized particles. Chem. Eng. Technol., 28: 53-60.
CrossRef  |  

22:  Yu, W., D.M. France, J.L. Routbort and S.U.S. Choi, 2008. Review and comparison of nanofluid thermal conductivity and heat transfer enhancements. Heat Transfer Eng., 29: 432-460.
CrossRef  |  

23:  Zhou, M., W.F. Cai and C.J. Xu, 2003. The hybrid process accompanied by ultrafine particles. Korean J. Chem. Eng., 20: 347-353.
CrossRef  |  

24:  Rajan, K.S., B. Pitchumani, S.N. Srivastava and B. Mohanty, 2007. Two-dimensional simulation of gas-olid heat transfer in pneumatic conveying. Int. J. Heat Mass Trans., 50: 967-976.
CrossRef  |  Direct Link  |  

©  2021 Science Alert. All Rights Reserved