Distribution of Some Phenotypical Characters Within an Olive Population in Djebel Ouslet (Tunisia)
Ben Yahya Linda
This research was conducted with the main purpose to evaluate the level of genetic similarities among an olive population situated in Djebel Ouslet (central east of Tunisia). Morphological characters and phenological growth stages of four olive cultivars Ousleti, Brahmi, Chaibi and Jeli were described during 2004-2006. Morphological classification used, was based on tree, leaf, inflorescence, fruit and endocarp characteristics. Technological characters of the fruits concerned the oil content and their chemical composition. Floral phenology, flowering and pistil abortion rates of the cultivars were recorded at full bloom. Also, a pollen monitoring survey for each cultivar was investigated. This study shows the relative differences between cultivars in flowering, fruiting patterns, oil yield and fatty acid contents of the fruits. Under the conditions of Djebel Ouslet, the flowering period of the cultivars was similar and covered each other but little differences were recorded in the duration and the onset of flowering. The evaluation of self-fertility showed that all cultivars can be considered self-compatible and fruiting rates were higher under free-pollination than under self-pollination. The results obtained are consistent with the high pollen capacity of the cultivars, suggesting their use as pollinizers in the cross-pollination assays to improve productivity. Large differences in oil content and in fatty acid profiles were observed in the cultivars examined. But their olive oil are conform to international standards. The ranges of fatty acid for all the cultivars fall within the accepted limits for fatty acid composition of Virgin olive oil. This database of the most representative cultivars grown in Djebel Ouslet concerning their agronomic and chemical characteristics could be exploited for screening synonyms within this olive population and could provide information for cultural purposes and breeding programs.
Received: November 05, 2011;
Accepted: March 28, 2012;
Published: May 17, 2012
In Tunisia, olive cultivation is of great importance with 1.68 millions hectares
and 65.9 millions of olive trees, producing over ten crop years (1996-2005)
an average 149.000 tons olive oil. There is an enormous potential for olive
oil (65%) and table olive (0.9%) production as an important export industry
(yield for 2005 put production at 130.000 tons from which 109.400 tons of olive
oil were exported). This olive oil must be competitive against other vegetables
oils with similar chemical characteristics and which were cheaper (importation
of 320.000 tons vegetable oil in 2005) (DGEDA, 2006).
This olive population presents multiple phenotypic expressions and manifests
a diversity of morphologic and physiologic characteristics corresponding to
different aptitudes and qualities. It comprised many of local cultivars which
were selected for their qualitative and quantitative traits and for their adaptability
to various microclimates such as cv. Gerboui (Mehri and
Mehri-Kamoun, 2007), cv. Meski (Mehri et al.,
To be sustainable and to be competitive on the international market, Tunisian
olive industry has to adopt high quality techniques in management and production
technology. For the important issues are to use best cultivars suitable for
extreme conditions such as high salinity and drought between local olive cultivars.
Unfortunately, there is limited reliable performance data for local olive cultivar
under the Tunisian conditions. For this purpose, a local olive cultivar assessment
program has been established in Tunisia to evaluate the performance and to describe
local olive cultivars in order to resolve the confusion in cultivar identity
and to assist olive producers in choosing best cultivars (Mehri
and Hellali, 1995; Mehri et al., 1997; Mehri
and Mehri-Kamoun, 2007; on Gerboui cultivar).
Different techniques have been used to evaluate olive diversity, to analyze
germplasm variability and to differentiate between cultivars: morphological
characters (Barranco and Rallo, 1984; Mehri
and Hellali, 1995; Nieddu et al., 1995; Mehri
et al., 1997; Cantini et al., 1999;
Pinheiro and da Silva, 2005; Mehri
and Mehri-Kamoun, 2007), isozyme analysis (Ouazzani
et al., 1993; Hilali et al., 1995;
Trujillo et al., 1995) and molecular markers (Fabbri
et al., 1995; Angiolillo et al., 1999;
Nikoloudakis et al., 2003). The latest technique
was used to assess the genetic diversity of olive cultivars (Sheidai
et al., 2007; Peyvandi et al., 2009)
and to provide a good discriminatory system, independent of environmental conditions
while identification based on quantitative and qualitative morphological characters
give variability due to environmental fluctuation effect on expression of most
Many studies were conducted on olive oil which is used throughout the world
and is believed to have an important role in human health and nutrition. Leaves
of wild olive trees were used as green tea (Shah et al.,
Olive oil can be used as good sources of natural antioxidant for medical and
commercial uses. It has the highest antioxidant activity (Hajimahmoodi
et al., 2008; Mudgal et al., 2010)
and a high phenolic content (Gomez-Caravaca et al.,
2007). Also, by-products of olive tree such as leaves and shoots were proved
to be technically and economically an efficient horticultural substrate (Latigui
et al., 2011).
In Tunisia, morphological and phenological traits have been used to identify
olive cultivars following (Mehri and Hellali, 1995) in
a survey of northern, central and coastal regions. This previous study allows
discriminating 219 accessions out of 79 local denominations from which 43 are
of unknown origin (Mehri et al., 1997). They
also detected slight differences in three olive samples of the same cultivar
Zarrazi from different geographic locations: Kalaa Kebira (coastal region),
Siliana (Northern) and Gafsa (Southern area of Tunisia).
The objectives of the present study were to identify four olive cultivars that are the most representative from the central part of Tunisia (Djebel Ouslet), to evaluate the level of genetic variation between cultivars and within this olive population. The cultivars chosen were Ousleti, Chaibi, Jeli and Brahmi and the morphological descriptors concerned tree, leaf, inflorescence, fruit and endocarp. The olive fruits were examined for their morphology and oil composition (oil content and quality) and for endocarp characteristics. For phenological growth stages, floral biology and a pollen monitoring survey for each cultivar were investigated concerning average number of flowers, of hermaphrodite flowers/inflorescence, pistil abortion rate, floral phenology and flowering rate. Another objective was to compare self and free-pollination of the four cultivars by pollination assays in the field.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study site: The olive population used in this study was located at Djebel Ouslet in the central-east of Tunisia which occupied large parts of mountains and hills areas with a gradient of around 45% (Fig. 1). It has about 2300 ha of olive orchards located in agricultural region of the Governorate of Kairouan. This site has a typical Mediterranean climate (with a rainy mild winter, dry and warm summer) and a history of good olive oil quality. The mean annual rainfall of 300-400 mm year-1 is irregularly distributed in space and time. The textural class is sandy-clay and the main land degradation types in this site are predominant rocky areas and soil erosion. Recently, stone wall are constructed and olive and carob trees planted in trips running across the slope to reduce the erosion by reducing runoff and breaking up its trajectory over sloping lands.
Material: Local information on agronomic characteristics indicates that this olive material is very ancient and sourced from old colonial groves. Many of the trees have been overgrown by trees originating from seeds or by suckers. This material, where records are incomplete and unreliable leading to confusion about the identity of trees, comprised mainly four olive cultivars Ousleti, Brahmi, Chaibi and Jeli. The names given to those cultivars have arisen through the site or home locality (cv. Ousleti from Djebel Ouslet and Ousletia regions) or according the fruit maturation period (Chaibi), the oiling potential or the origin (grafted on wild trees such as cv. Jeli) or from seedlings such as cv. El-Horr). But all the cultivars are of unknown origin.
In this olive population, there is no set pattern to pruning, the trees received hardly any pruning or were pruned at long intervals which accentuate alternate bearing in the olive trees. It is characterized by a predominance of small growers using traditional management techniques.
Morphological characterization: Morphological characterization has
been carried out of the four cultivars and standard morphological descriptors
established for olive (IOOC methodology, IOOC, 1997)
were used in this study concerning tree, leaf, inflorescence and fruit-endocarp.
Samples from fruits, leaves and inflorescences were recorded for each cultivar
for their subsequent description.
To evaluate foliage vigour and tree size, the canopy density, trunk circumference
(at 0.20 m from the graft point or at 0.45 m from the ground) and the tree height
of each cultivar were measured.
|| Traditional olive farming in Djebel Ouslet area
Shoot growth: length, number of leaves and internodes per shoot were also
recorded. The leaf characters measured were shape, apical and basal angle, leaf
length and breadth ratio (L/W). Fruit characteristics included shape, colour
and size, position of diameter maximum, shape of the base, apex and middle of
the fruit, presence or absence of the mucro as well as depth of the peduncular
cavity. Some important agronomic features of the cultivars were also recorded.
The characteristics of the inflorescences observed concerned length and number
of flowers per inflorescence.
Fresh fruit weight was determined by weighing 10 olives and calculating the average weigh per olive. The endocarps were cleaned of all residual flesh, weighed and flesh to pit ratio calculated and was determined by expressing the weight of the flesh (whole olive weight minus the stone weight) divided by the weight of the stone.
Olive quality characteristics: Olive samples of each cultivar were harvested from the grove in Djebel Ouslet at full colour development (December-January) black stage. They were analyzed for oil content and fatty acid composition.
Oil content: Oil content was obtained using a hammer mill. The crushed fruits were mixed for 30 min at 25°C and then the oil was separated by centrifugation.
Fatty acid analysis: The analyses were performed according to the method
described in a previous work on cv. Gerboui (Mehri and Mehri-Kamoun,
2007). Fatty acid profiles of the oils were determined by gas chromatographic
analysis of the Fatty Acid Methyl Esters (FAME), using a DB 225 capillary column
operating isothermally at 220°C with a run time of 15 min. Nitrogen (0.6
bar) was the carrier gas and injector and flame ionisation detector temperatures
of 220 and 250°C, respectively, were used. Peaks corresponding to different
methyl esters fatty acids were identified.
Floral biology and phenological growth stages: In order to study the compatibility between the four cultivars studied, a morphological characterization of inflorescences, flowering phenology, a pollen monitory survey and fertility behaviour by pollination assays were conducted inside the experimental olive grove.
Flower quality and morphology: The purpose was to assess flower quality during the bloom period of each cultivar which refers to the relative development of the pistil (pistil abortion) and the resulting ability to set fruit. Branches about 40 cm long with full floral differentiation (90-95% of the buds) were chosen for each cultivar from a minimum of three trees. Flower morphology as well as the percent of staminate flowers were determined annually on at least 100 flowers of each cultivar collected at random around the tree at the beginning of bloom. The bloom period of the four cultivars was evaluated according to the phenological stages: first flowers opened; start of blooming (when 10% of flowers were opened); full blooming (when 50% of flowers were opened) and the end of flowers (when petals start to fall).
Pollen compatibility: Pollen compatibility for each cultivar was evaluated
by estimating pollen germination and tube length into a solid germination medium
containing 0.7% agar, 20% sucrose, 100 ppm H3BO3 (Mehri
et al., 2003) at pH 5. Cultures were held at 25°C for 72 h. Counted
pollen grains were at least 200 per petri dish. A pollen grain was considered
germinated when the length of its pollen tube was equal to or exceeded its diameter
(Stanley and Linkens, 1974). Pollen germination and tube
growth were determined after 3, 6, 12, 24, 48 and 72 h on 50 pollen grains chosen
at random from various locations in the pollen sample.
Fertility behaviour: Research on the self fertility behaviour and free pollination requirements of each olive cultivar was carried out at Djebel Ouslet during 2004, 2005 and 2006. For each cultivar, five trees were used and before flower opening, ten shoots bearing about 150 inflorescences were tagged. Five shoots served as controls. Before anthesis, a suitable number of inflorescences and flowers were counted per shoot and were divided into two parts. One part was isolated in paper bags to determine fruit set under self pollination. When flowers start to open the enclosed branches were hand-shaken to insure pollination. The second part of inflorescences was left intact to evaluate fruit set under free pollination. After petal fall, about 30-40 days after full bloom and after loss of stigma reception, paper bags were removed and the fruit counted. Fruit set was recorded based on total number of flowers. To evaluate the self-fertility, an R1 index was calculated as the ratio between the fruit set in self and free-pollination.
Statistical analysis: All the experimental results obtained in this study are reported as mean values of experiments performed in two growing seasons 2004 and 2006, except for pollination assays elaborated in three consecutive years. The values were statistically elaborated to compare means, using Students test. This test was performed for each character to identify significant differences.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Floral biology and phenological growth stages of olive trees cultivars Chaibi,
Brahmi, Jeli and Ousleti in Djebel Ouslet olive grove
Evaluation of flowering phenology: This study was conducted at Djebel
Ouslet, during 2004 and 2006 by investigating floral biology of each cultivar:
the average number of total flowers and of hermaphrodite flowers/inflorescence,
pistil abortion rate, floral phenology and flowering rate. Flower quality refers
to the relative development of the pistil and the resulting ability to fruit
set. As shown in Fig. 2, the mean percentage of flower buds
on the shoot varied among the cultivars with no significant difference.
||Mean percentage of vegetative, floral and quiescent buds of
four olive cultivars grown in Djebel Ouslet
||Average blooming dates of 3 olive cultivars (Brahmi, Jeli
and Chaibi) as compared to Ousleti cultivar grown in Djebel Ouslet during
2004-2006. The percentages indicate the proportion of flowers opened, SB:
Start blooming, FB: Full blooming, EB: End blooming
For all the cultivars, 39 to 43.1% of lateral buds are quiescent, 41.6 to
49.2% develop inflorescences and 11.8 to 15.3% develop shoots. It is important
to consider these parameters under orchard conditions because the yield in off
year is positively correlated with the number of reproductive buds (Cuevas
et al., 1994). Also, a relation between shoot vigour, level of flowering
and fruit set potential was found in olive (Lavee et
The average blooming dates of Chaibi, Brahmi and Jeli cultivars compared to Ousleti, are given in Fig. 3. There is a slight time difference between the dates of start blooming; it was by 2 days between Ousleti and Chaibi cultivars and by 9-10 days between Brahmi and Jeli cultivars. However, the period of full blooming coincided in all cultivars with difference of 2 days according to the cultivar. Chaibi, Brahmi and Jeli bloom later than the main cultivar Ousleti. The latest was the earliest to bloom with the others blooming at the same time or later with a maximum of 7 days. Cultivars Chaibi, Brahmi bloom 1 or 2 days later but cv. Jeli bloom 7 days later. The late blooming cultivar (Jeli) had longer blooming period but the flowers are predominantly staminate and their development retarded.
The onset of the bloom season varied between 17 and 21 days for the cultivars.
Brahmi cultivar showed the shortest bloom. We noted during the experiments when
winter was cold, late blooming followed. A clear influence of spring temperature
on flower development was recorded. Its in agreement with Bernad
et al. (1995) on almond. Low spring temperatures increase the length
of the bloom period while higher temperatures shorten it.
We have also observed a relationship between date of flower opening and the
percentage of perfect flowers of the four cultivars studied. The first-opening
flowers were predominantly perfect. Sterile flowers tend to open later suggesting
that the critical for crop setting is early flowering in olive and insist on
the onset of flowering. This difference may be attributed in flower quality
to physiological and nutritional effects and reflect also genetic differences
as signalled by Bernad et al. (1995) on almond.
All these results indicate that the flowering behaviour of the four cultivars
in Djebel Ouslet area is very interesting; it allows a good pollination between
the cultivars. Also, the flowering periods of all cultivars cover each other.
|| Pollen viability, germination rates and tube growth of four
olive cultivars grown in Djebel Ouslet
Griggs (1975) reported that a difference of maximum
7 days between bloom initiations could insure an efficient pollination in olive
Pollen viability and germination: The data in Table 1 show that all the cultivars had pollen grains with a very high degree of viability never below 80%. No statistical differences were found in mean pollen viability and a positive correlation between fresh pollen viability and germination was recorded in all cultivars. The maximum obtained after 72 h incubation were 60.6, 53.2, 51.9 and 61.7% for Ousleti, Chaibi, Brahmi and Jeli cultivars, respectively. The longest length of pollen tubes achieved was 642 and 664 μm for Ousleti and Jeli cultivars and 411 and 431 μm for Chaibi, Brahmi, respectively.
The fasted rate of germination is represented by Jeli cultivar (61.7%) and pollen tubes reached 664.2 μm after 72 h incubation. A significant difference was observed for Brahmi and Chaibi cultivars which exhibited both slower germination and pollen tube growth and required at least 72 h to reach 50% germination and 400 μm tube length. Their pollen germination proceeded very slowly compared with Ousleti.
Many studies on olive pollen signalled the potential the usefulness of pollen
germination on fruit setting and the effectiveness of insecticides and bioinsecticides
sprayed on trees during flowering on pollen capacity (viability, germination
and tube growth) (Mehri et al., 2007a, b).
Pollination and fertility behaviour: The objective was to compare self
and free pollination in these four cultivars, from 2004 to 2006, to study their
fertility behaviour. The level of fruit set based on total number of flowers
was significantly different between the four cultivars. The amount of fruit
set was high in cultivars Ousleti (2.2%) and Jeli (2.15%) and low in cultivars
Brahmi (0.82%) and Chaibi (1.03%). A good commercial yields of olives can be
achieved with fruit set as low as 1-2% of the flowers (Martin,
Fruiting rates were higher under free-pollination than obtained following self-pollination in all cultivars (Table 2) and produced more than a 3 fold increase in fruit set over that of self-pollination in cultivars Chaibi and Brahmi and two times in cultivars Jeli and Ousleti. But fruit set under free-pollination conditions were not significantly different between cultivars; they were ranged from 2.8 to 3.75%. Differences between treatments (self and free pollination) were high but differences between cultivars for each treatment were not significative. These results were fully confirmed with the values of R1 index calculated and defined as the ratio of fruit set following self-pollination to that following free-pollination. It varied greatly in all cultivars from self and free pollination assays but all indicate that the four cultivars were compatible at different level (R1>0.5) from 0.52 and 0.59 for cultivars Ousleti and Brahmi to 0.71 for cv. Jeli. Values of R1 low and close to zero, has been suggested to be an indication of self-incompatibility.
We consider that all the cultivars were self-compatible in Djebel Ouslet environment
but cross-pollination was necessary to improve fruit-set.
||Percentage of fruit set in self and free-pollinated flowers
(based on total number of flowers) and fertility index (R1) (as the ratio
of fruit set in self and free pollination) of four olive cultivars in the
area of Djebel Ouslet
The percentages obtained after free-pollination indicated clearly the need
for cross-pollination to ensure and enhance fruit set in the four cultivars
studied as suggested on other olive cultivars by Cuevas
et al. (2001), Lavee and Datt (1978) and
Lavee et al. (2002). It is urgent to study and
to investigate the cross-pollination effect on pollination and fruit set under
these conditions. Differences and variations in fruit set were found within
and between the cultivars, this can be attributed to varying degree of self-fertility
in olive as suggested by Cuevas and Rallo (1990) and
Lavee et al. (2002). Such results are in agreement
with other experiments conducted on other Tunisian cultivars in other environments,
cv. Gerboui from the northern part of Tunisia (Mehri and
Pollination results and the high pollen capacity of all cultivars (high pollen
viability and in vitro germination rates) recorded in all cultivars
studied, can suggest the existence of intercompatibility between those cultivars
and showed their good performance as pollinizer for olive cultivars which are
self-incompatible such as Meski, a Tunisian table olive (Mehri
and Kamoun-Mehri, 1995; Mehri et al., 2003).
Regarding to the high pollen capacity obtained, we can suggest a relationship between fertility behaviour of the cultivars studied and pollen performance. In fact fruit set following self and free pollination was correlated with high performance of self pollen tubes grown in vitro recorded in this study. Also, these findings of high pollen capacity suggested that all cultivars can be used as pollinizers in the cross-pollination to improve productivity. Also, the high pollen germination and high tube growth are consistent with the self-compatibility degree of the four cultivars studied.
Olive quality parameters: Olive quality parameters have been studied
for all the cultivars (including oil content, fruit weight flesh to pit ratio
and fatty acid composition) because they present major parameters of interest
to growers. Comparison between all cultivars showed variability in quality parameters
(oil and fatty acid contents of the fruit) based on IOOC standards and the ranges
of fatty acid composition for all cultivars studied and listed in Table
3 and 4, fall within the accepted limits for fatty acid
composition of Virgin Olive Oil (IOOC, 1997).
Oil content: From the results of oil yield shown in Table
3, the best performing cultivar in this site in terms of olive oil is Ousleti.
There are, however large differences in oil content observed across the cultivars
examined. Oil yields ranged from 5 for cv. Jeli to 25% for Ousleti fruits. Ousleti
and Chaibi cultivars produced more than triple the amount of oil produced by
cv. Jeli. Other factors must be considered since the characterization of olive
oil is considered by many researchers as difficult due to variation in composition
caused by extraction methods, environmental and storage conditions (Sweeney,
2003). Earlier findings (Lavee and Wodner, 2004),
showed that the final oil content in the fruits is dependant on the interaction
between the growing conditions and the genetic potential of the variety.
Jeli, Brahmi and Chaibi cultivars have low fruit weight, while Ousleti has medium sized olives. The average of olive weight and flesh to pit ratio were lower mainly in Chaibi and Jeli cultivars.
||The average and respective standard deviations of fruit weight,
oil content and flesh to pit ratio of four olive cultivars in the survey
of Djebel Ouslet
||Oil and fatty acid contents of four olive cultivars at Djebel
|±Standard error of the difference, the accepted limits
for fatty acid composition of Virgin Olive Oil (IOOC,
1997) are shown in the first row
Ousleti was the only medium sized olives with highest oil content. Fruit weight
is one of the main variables to be considered when assessing the suitability
of an olive cultivar for mechanical shakes at harvest (Civantos,
1996). The cultivars of smaller fruit such as Jeli have lower oil content
than Ousleti with medium sized olives. It is generally accepted in olive tree
that cultivars with smaller fruit have at maturation higher oil content than
cultivars with large fruit (Morettini, 1972; Patumi
et al., 2002; on cv. Kalamata).
Pit ratio of fruit was measured for all the cultivars because it is an important
value for the table olive cultivars while oil yield is most important for the
oil producing cultivars. Flesh to pit ratio greater than 5:1 is an indicator
of suitability of olives for table fruit (Rahmani et
al., 1997). Table 3 shows that the cultivars Ousleti
and Brahmi have a ratio greater than 5:1 (6.57 and 5.45, respectively) indicating
their suitability for dual purpose (oil and table olive production) while cultivars
Chaibi and Jeli have lower, with 3.89 and 4.93, respectively. There are other
factors such as shape, size and colour of fruit that are also of great importance
and that are considered in this study.
Fatty acids: Table 4 shows the means of six fatty
acid concentrations of the four olive cultivars. Comparison cultivars indicated
that oils of the four olive cultivars have acceptable levels of oleic acid varying
from 66.8 to 80.45%. Palmitic acid (C16:1) which is a saturated fatty acid and
undesirable varied from high (15.1% in cv. Jeli) to low in cultivars Brahmi
and Chaibi (9.68 and 9.13%, respectively). Oleic acid was the predominant fatty
acid while linoleic acid was detected in very low rate, lower than the 1% limit
set for virgin olive oil (Burr, 1998). The oleic acid
content which is a monounsaturated fatty acid, was high in cultivars Brahmi,
Ousleti and Chaibi, while the saturated fatty acid content was lower according
to IOOC standards. A high level of oleic acid is considered favourable in olive
oil due to enhanced oxidative stability (Smouse, 1996)
and superior nutritional quality (Kritchevsky, 1996).
The proportions of these 3 fatty acids were significantly different for each
of the cultivar and are important as they have been used to indicate the best
time for harvesting olives (Rahmani et al., 1997;
Mailer et al., 2005; Sweeney,
2003). Linolenic acid (C18:3), a minor fatty acid in olives, present a level
below 1% with a maximum in Jeli cultivar (0.73%).
The unsaturated/saturated and monounsaturated/polyunsaturated acid ratios of
oil varied among cultivars from low in Jeli to high in Brahmi, We have determined
in this study these two parameters which are of great interest and influence
the quality of oil. The unsaturated/saturated influences the organoleptic characteristics
of the oil; as oil with a high content of saturated fatty acids is more viscous.
The monounsaturated /polyunsaturated acid ratio is important to the intrinsic
oxidative stability of the oil and is associated to high stability and low rancidity
of olive oil (Tous and Romero, 1993).
Because of lack of pruning and irrigation and poor health, the cultivars are difficult to compare for olive yield. But we consider that this olive population is a valuable genetic resource for olive germplasm and will provide a valuable gene pool for the future. The fatty acid profiles of these four cultivars can help in future selection of nutritionally olive oil. These results have revealed much about the performance of the four olive cultivars. However more data is required on total yields, health and vigour to gain a fuller picture on cultivar suitability for Djebel Ouslet area.
We noted a relationship between fruit size, oil content and fatty acid composition
in all cultivars. The final oil content in olive fruits is dependent on the
interaction between the growing conditions and the genetic potential of the
cultivar (Lavee and Wodner, 2004) and seasonal climatic
variations influence the oil content in olive fruit and fatty acid composition
(Robards and Mailer, 2001). A correlation between fruit
weight and flesh to pit ratio indicates that a greater fruit weight implies
a proportionally higher increase in flesh than endocarp weight. Leon
et al. (2004) have also reported a positive correlation between flesh
oil content and flesh to pit ratio and between oil yield components and fatty
Factors such as olive cultivars, cultivation area, seasonal climatic variations and agronomic practices of Djebel Ouslet can influence floral biology and oil quality parameters of cultivars studied. This also can be due to an alternate bearing phenomenon accentuated by the dry climate conditions.
Kaskoos et al. (2009) determined the fatty acid
composition of the olive oil of cv Iraqi and noted that the unsaturated/saturated
ratio was 3,25. The high unsaturated fatty acid content signified its potential
as a health promoter. It can be expected to offer considerable resistance to
oxidative rancidity during storage.
Trees and shoot development: Table 5 includes, for each
cultivar, shoot growth during vegetative period (length, number of leaves and
internodes per shoot), trunk circumference at 0.45 cm from the ground and the
height of every cultivar.
||Average tree height and diameter, shoot growth, number of
leaves/shoot and internodes/shoot of four olive cultivars grown in Djebel
The result of vegetative performance reported in Table 5,
show that the height ranges from 219.7 cm for cv. Ousleti to 266.4 cm for cv.
Brahmi which is tallest tree. Tree size is an important consideration for straddle
harvesters which can only harvest trees less than 250 cm tall (Robards
and Mailer, 2001; Sweeney, 2003). So cv. Ousleti was
the more suited for harvesting. The highest trunk circumference is recorded
in Ousleti with 49.29 cm and all cultivars have values between 35 and 50 cm,
this parameter is an indicator for the tree vigour (Nieddu
et al., 1995). The trees are vigorous from open (cv. Brahmi) to a
close growth habit (cultivars Ousleti, Chaibi and Jeli), with dense canopy and
few sylleptic shoots.
Shoot elongation reached at the end of vegetative growth period (November-December) an average of 12.58, 11.41, 12.04 and 9.76 cm, for cultivars Ousleti, Brahmi, Chaibi and Jeli, respectively. The number of leaves and internodes per shoot developed during this period give a mean internode length of about 14 mm for all the cultivars.
Leaf description: The shape of the leaves which is determined from the ratio between length and width is elliptic-lanceolate for all the cultivars. The leaf basal angle is acute for all the cultivars while the apical angle is open for Jeli and acute for Ousleti and Chaibi and very acute in Brahmi. The leaves of Jeli are short and wide while for the other cultivars, leaves are long and narrow.
Inflorescence description: A general description of the inflorescence of the four cultivars studied was determined recording their length, number of flowers and perfect flowers (Table 6). The average inflorescence length is medium between 25 and 35 mm for Jeli, Brahmi and Chaibi and short (<25 mm) for Ousleti cultivars. The number of flowers/inflorescence is also medium varying between 18 and 25 flowers (17 for cultivars Jeli and Brahmi cultivars, 19 for cv. Chaibi and 22 for cv. Ousleti).
The percentage of staminate flowers (pistil abortion rate) differed among cultivars;
it was very high in cv. Brahmi and low in cv. Jeli. The latest cultivar produced
less number of flowers (17 per inflorescence) but less staminate flowers rate
(pistil abortion, 28.14%). In the contrary, with the same number of flowers
per inflorescence (17), Brahmi flowers exhibit higher percentage of sterility
with a highest pistil abortion (39.9%). The number of perfect flowers per inflorescence
ranged between 9 (cv. Brahmi) and 12 (cultivars Jeli, Chaibi and Ousleti). A
high proportion of sterile flowers is considered as a negative trait in the
evaluation of fruit set and olive yield (Lavee et al.,
1999). We noted also that the lowest percentage of perfect flowers was generally
recorded on the northern side of the tree and in the top of the shoots, while
the highest percentage was recorded on the southern side and in the middle of
each flowering shoot. The first flowers to open were of better quality than
the later-opening ones since they were perfect flowers and gave the highest
fruit-set. Physiological and environmental effects such as nutrition, irrigation
can be an important determinant of olive flower quality and the differences
recorded between cultivars reflect probably genetic differences (Cuevas
et al., 1994; Lavee et al., 1996;
||Average number of flowers, of perfect flowers/inflorescence,
pistil abortion and perfect flower rates of four olive cultivars grown in
Fruit description: The symmetry of the fruit is observed on Jeli cultivar but Brahmi, Ousleti and Chaibi fruits are slightly asymmetric. All the cultivars show absence of olive nipple, a central position of maximum transverse diameter of the fruit. The shape of the fruit which is determined from the ratio between the length (L) and the width (W) is elongated except for Ousleti cultivar which is ovoid. Fruit base is truncated for cultivars Jeli and Chaibi and rounded for cultivars Ousleti and Brahmi. The fruit apex is rounded for the cultivars Brahmi, Ousleti and Chaibi and pointed for cv. Jeli. All the cultivars showed absence of olive nipple. Localisation of initial turning is from the base for cultivars Ousleti, Jeli and Chaibi while for cv. Brahmi, the initial turning is uniform under all epidermis. The peduncular cavity is deep in cultivars Ousleti and Brahmi and superficial in cultivars Jeli and Chaibi fruits.
Endocarp description: The endocarp apex of all the cultivars is sharp-point with a short mucro. The cultivars Jeli, Ousleti and Chaibi present a maximum transverse diameter positioned in the central part of the endocarp while in Brahmi endocarp, the maximum transverse diameter is towards apex. The endocarp distribution of fibrovascular sulcus is half uniform for all cultivars. The endocarp is rugose for Brahmi and Chaibi and smooth for Jeli and Ousleti cultivars. Grooving is medium for Brahmi, Ousleti, strong for Jeli and weak for Chaibi. The course of the grooving is longitudinal in Brahmi, Ousleti, Chaibi and not uniform in Jeli endocarp. The depth of grooving is weak in cv. Ousleti and medium in cultivars Brahmi, Jeli and Chaibi.
In the present study, technique based on morphological characters was used to evaluate the level of genetic variation within a mountainous olive population situated in the central-east area of Tunisia which is precisely Djebel Ouslet. Djebel Ouslet varietal structure is somewhat confusing and no systematic studies exist on the olive cultivar performance growing in this area. This work concerned the most representative olive cultivars Jeli, Brahmi, Ousleti, Chaibi and the discrimination of these olive cultivars revealed variability within and between cultivars indicating a wide and diverse genetic background of olive in Djebel Ouslet.
The relative differences within cultivars was based mainly on flowering, fruiting
patterns, quality parameters based on IOOC standards (oil yield and fatty acid
contents of the fruits) and in fruit and endocarp descriptions. It is clear
that morphological characters (using 32 biometric parameters) permit to discriminate
between most cultivars but the variation within trees is however less than variation
between cultivars. The results obtained in this work showed a high level of
precision and different correlations between characters among cultivars was
determined. The knowledge of these correlations could also allow the improvement
of the method used by reducing the number of parameters (9 most discriminating
variables instead of the all set of 32 as recommended by IOOC
(1999) as suggested by Pinheiro and da Silva (2005).
The ranges of fatty acid composition for all cultivars studied, fall within
the accepted limits for fatty acid composition of Virgin Olive Oil (IOOC,
1997). The results obtained illustrate the link between fruit weight of
cultivars and the fatty acid composition. Also, a close link between pollen
capacity of four cultivars and their compatibility behaviour was observed. However
other important parameters have to be taken in account such as local climatic
and edaphic conditions. A high degree of genetic variability was observed among
olive cultivars probably due to varying degrees of cultivar adaptability to
the pedoclimatic conditions and agronomic practices adopted in the field trials
(Patumi et al., 1999, 2002),
to fruit size, to commercial use (oil or table uses) and to principal area of
cultivation (Sanz-Cortes et al., 2001; Nikoloudakis
et al., 2003).
The effectiveness of pomological characters in discriminating the most representative
cultivars in Djebel Ouslet seems to be not sufficient but could be exploited
for screening synonyms within the olive population and could provide information
for cultural purposes and breeding programs. It is important to compare all
these physiological and morphological data provided for each cultivar with a
DNA fingerprinting results in the future. Correct identification of germplasm
resources is of importance to plant material management (Sanz-Cortes
et al., 2001). The investigation of Guerin et
al. (2002) on the genetic identity of Australian olive accessions, has
shown that many of the commercially used cultivars known under different names
have identical DNA fingerprints so they are synonyms. Intracultivar variability
in olives has been detected using the RAPD technique (Fabbri
et al., 1995; Mekuria et al., 1999,
2002) and ISSR markers (Terzopoulos
et al., 2005). The use of molecular markers can be used in parallel
to pomological characters as an alternative tool with optimal results for the
olive crop. The main disadvantage of this method is the long analysis process
which is subjective and can involves errors.
The characterization of this olive genetic resource of Djebel Ouslet is very important since both olive productivity and oil quality are traits inherent to a cultivar. The information obtained in this work can serve for varietal improvement and will enable olive producers to make informed cultivar choices from this morphological characterization and the performance of the most representative olive cultivars grown in Djebel Ouslet.
The results obtained can resolve the confusion in olive cultivar identity mainly for local cultivar in Tunisia. Several names exist for some cultivars and the cultivar which is most abundant within Djebel Ouslet grove is Ousleti. This cultivar seems to be mixed up with different names such as El-Horr (from seedlings), El-Guim (when grafted on wild olive trees). Many trees showed signs of rootstock (wild Oleaster) or feral olives (from germinated seeds growing at the base of the trees). Also cv. Chaibi has been identified as synonym of cv. Chetoui, the most widespread olive cultivar in the northern area of Tunisia.
In addition to generate regional employment, olive trees in Djebel Ouslet is an important source of income in these rural areas and provides ecological benefits by contribution to soil retention and reducing erosion.
This diversity within the Djebel Ouslet grove offers an excellent source of genetic material for future research and agriculture. More research and development studies must be achieved on this plant material, since it provides a unique opportunity to study a large range of olive cultivars, a large gene pool of trees representing many of interest cultivars well adapted to this home locality.
1: Angiolillo, A., M. Mencuccini and L. Baldoni, 1999. Olive genetic diversity assessed using amplified fragment polymorphism. Theor. Applied Genet., 98: 411-421.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
2: Barranco, D. and L. Rallo, 1984. Olive Cultivars Cultived in Andalucia, Agriculture Council of Andalucia Province. Ministery of Agriculture, Fishing and Food, Madrid, Pages: 150.
3: Bernad, D., R. Socias and I. Company, 1995. Characterization of some self-compatible almonds. II. Flower phenology and morphology. HortScience, 30: 321-324.
Direct Link |
4: Burr, M., 1998. Varieties. In: Australian Olives: A Guide for Growers and Producers of Virgin Oils, Burr, M. (Ed.). 3rd Edn., Burr, Michael, Adelaide, ISBN: 9780646348155, pp: 106-116.
5: Cantini, C., A. Cimato and G. Sani, 1999. Morphological evaluation of olive germplasm present in Tuscany region. Euphytica, 109: 173-181.
Direct Link |
6: Civantos, L., 1996. Techniques of Production. In: World Olive Encyclopaedia, IOOC, (Ed.). International Olive Oil Council, Madrid, Spain, pp: 147-194.
7: Cuevas, J. and L. Rallo, 1990. Response to cross-pollination in olive trees with different levels of flowering. Acta Hort., 286: 179-182.
Direct Link |
8: Cuevas, J., L. Rallo and H.F. Rapoport, 1994. Crop load effects on floral quality in olive. Sci. Hortic., 59: 123-130.
9: Cuevas, J., A.J. Diaz Hermoso, D. Galian, J.J. Hueso and V. Pinillos et al., 2001. Response to cross pollination and choice of pollinisers for the olive cultivars (Olea europaea L.) Manzanilla de sevilla, hojiblanca and picual Olive, 85: 26-32.
10: DGEDA, 2006. Economic budget of the year 2006. Activity report. General direction of study and agriculture development. Ministry of Agriculture and hydraulic resources of Tunisia. pp: 50.
11: Fabbri, A., J.I. Hormaza and V.S. Polito, 1995. Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars. J. Am. Soc. Sci., 120: 538-542.
Direct Link |
12: Gomez-Caravaca, A.M., L. Cerretani, A. Bendini, A. Segura-Carretero, A. Fernandez-Gutierrez and G. Lercker, 2007. Effect of filtration systems on the phenolic content in virgin olive oil by HPLC-DAD-MSD. Am. J. Food Technol., 2: 671-678.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
13: Griggs, W.H., 1975. Olive Pollination in California. Vol. 869, Agricultural Experiment Station, USA. Pages: 49.
14: Guerin, J.R., S.M. Sweeney, G.G. Collins and M. Sedgley, 2002. The development of a genetic database to identify olive cultivars. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 127: 977-983.
Direct Link |
15: Hajimahmoodi, M., N. Sadeghi, B. Jannat, M.R. Oveisi, S. Madani and M. Kiayi, 2008. Antioxidant activity, reducing power and total phenolic content of iranian olive cultivar. J. Boil. Sci., 8: 779-783.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
16: Hilali, S., N. Ghrissi and B. Boulouha, 1995. Biometric and protein-enzymatic characterisation of some olive varieties belonging to the Mediterranean collection. Olive, 55: 31-39.
17: IOOC., 1997. Primary characterization methodology of olive cultivars. Project of conservation, characterization collect and use of olive genetic resources. European community, olive international council. pp: 54.
18: IOOC, 1999. Trade standard applying to olive oil and olive-pomace oil. COI/T. /NC, NE2, Rev. 9.
19: Kaskoos, R.A., S. Amin, M. Ali and S.R. Mir, 2009. Chemical composition of fixed oil of Olea europaea drupes from Iraq. Res. J. Med. Plant, 3: 146-150.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
20: Kritchevsky, D., 1996. Food Lipids and Atherosclerosis. In: Food Lipids and Health, Mcdonald, R.E. and D.B. Min (Eds.). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA., ISBN: 978-0-76230-973-3 pp: 19-34.
21: Latigui, A., A. Zerarka, A. Kasmi, K. Mettai and O. Braik, 2011. The effect of agricultural byproduct of olive tree on horticultural substrate of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa) grown in soilless crop system. Am. J. Plant Physiol., 6: 83-90.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
22: Lavee, S. and Z. Datt, 1978. The necessity of cross-pollination for fruit set of Manzanillo olives. J. Hortic. Sci., 53: 261-266.
23: Lavee, S., N. Avidan, A. Haskala and A. Ogrodovich, 1996. Juvenility period reduction in olive seedlings: A tool for enhancement of breeding. Olive, 60: 33-41.
24: Lavee, S., L. Rallo, H.F. Rapoport and A. Troncoso, 1999. The floral biology of the olive II. The effect of inflorescence load and distribution per shoot on fruit set and load. Sci. Hortic., 82: 181-192.
Direct Link |
25: Lavee, S., J. Taryan, J. Levin and A. Haskal, 2002. Importance of cross-pollination of different olive varieties cultivated in high density under irrigated regime. Olivae, 91: 25-36.
26: Lavee, S., 2004. Biology and Physiology of the Olive. In: World Olive Encyclopedia, Intern. Olive Oil Council, Intern. Olive Oil Council, Spain, pp: 61-110.
27: Lavee, S. and M. Wodner, 2004. The effect of yield, harvest time and fruit size on the oil content in fruits of irrigated olive trees (Olea europaea), cvs Barnea and Manzanillo. Sci. Hortic., 99: 267-277.
28: Leon, L., L.M. Martin and L. Rallo, 2004. Phenotypic correlations among agronomic traits in olive progenies. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 129: 271-276.
29: Mailer, R., D. Conland and J. Ayton, 2005. Olive harvest: Harvest timing for optimal olive oil quality. Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. RIRDC Project NE DAN-197A, pp: 64.
30: Martin, G.C., 1990. Olive flower and fruit production dynamics. Acta Hortic., 286: 141-153.
31: Mehri, H. and R. Hellali, 1995. Pomologic study of the main olive varieties cultived in Tunisia. Olive Institute Review, Special Issue. pp: 45
32: Mehri, H. and R. Kamoun-Mehri, 1995. Floral biology of the olive: The problem of self-incompatibility in the Meski cultivar and search for pollinisers. Olivae, 55: 35-39.
33: Mehri, H., M. Msallem and R. Kamoun-Mehri, 1997. Identification of the main olive varieties cultived in Tunisia. Plant Gene. Resour. Newslett., 112: 68-72.
34: Mehri, H., R. Mehri-Kamoun, M. Msallem, A. Faidi and V. Polts, 2003. Reproductive behaviour of six olive cultivars as pollenizer of the self-incompatible olive cultivar Meski. Adv. Horticult. Sci., 17: 42-46.
35: Mehri, H. and R. Mehri-Kamoun, 2007. The bioagronomic characteristics of a local olive cultivar gerboui. Am. J. Plant Physiol., 2: 1-16.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
36: Mehri, H., R. Mehri-Kamoun, A. Ben Dhiab and M. El Mahjoub, 2007. Adverse effects of insecticidal sprays on bloom onset, pollen germination and fruit set of three olive cultivars. Int. J. Agric. Res., 2: 102-114.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
37: Mehri, H., R. Mehri-Kamoun and M. El Mahjoub, 2007. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of 3 insecticides and bio-insecticide effects on olive pollen germination and tube growth. J. Agron., 6: 518-525.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
38: Mekuria, G.T., G.C. Collins and M. Sedgley, 1999. Genetic variability between different accessions of some common commercial olive cultivars. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotech., 74: 309-314.
39: Mekuria, G.T., G.G. Collins and M. Sedgley, 2002. Genetic diversity within an isolated olive population in relation to feral spread. Sci. Hortic., 94: 91-105.
Direct Link |
40: Morettini, A., 1972. Olive Culture. Editorial Review of Agriculture. Rome, Italy, Pages: 522.
41: Mudgal, V., N. Madaan, A. Mudgal and S. Mishra, 2010. Dietary polyphenols and human health. Asian J. Biochem., 5: 154-162.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
42: Nieddu, G., I. Chessa and L. De Pau, 1995. Distribution of some phenotypical characters within an olive variety collection in Sardenia. Olive, 55: 21-25.
43: Nikoloudakis, N., G. Banilas, F. Gazis, P. Hatzopoulos and J. Metzidakis, 2003. Discrimination and genetic diversity among cultivated olives of Greece Using RAPD markers. J. Am. Soc. Hortsci., 128: 741-746.
Direct Link |
44: Ouazzani, N., R. Lumaret, P. Villemur and F. Di-Guisto, 1993. Leaf allozyme variation in cultivated and wild olive tree. J. Hered., 84: 34-42.
Direct Link |
45: Patumi, M., R. d`Andria, G. Fontanazza, G. Morelli , P. Giorgio and G. Sorrentino, 1999. Yield and of intensively trained trees of three cultivars of olive (Olea europaea L.) under different irrigation regimes. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechnol., 74: 27-34.
46: Patumi, M., R. d'Andria, V. Marsilio, G. Fontanazza, G. Morelli and B. Lanza, 2002. Olive and olive oil quality after intensive monocone olive growing (Olea europaea L., cv. Kalamata) in different irrigation regimes. Food Chem., 77: 27-34.
Direct Link |
47: Peyvandi, M., Z. Noormohammadi, O. Banihashemi, F. Farahani, A. Majd, M. Hosseini-Mazinani and M. Sheidai, 2009. Molecular analysis of genetic stability in long-term micropropagated shoots of Olea europaea L. (cv. Dezful). Asian J. Plant Sci., 8: 146-152.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
48: Pinheiro, P.B.M. and J.C.G.E. da Silva, 2005. Chemometric classification of olives from three portuguese cultivars of Olea europaea L. Anal. Chim. Acta, 544: 229-235.
49: Rahmani, M., M. Lamrini and A.S. Csallani, 1997. Development of a simple method for the determination of the optimum harvesting date for olives. Olive, 69: 48-51.
50: Robards, K. and R., Mailer, 2001. Olive oil, yield, quality and cultivar identification. Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation, RIRDC Project No. UCS-19A, pp: 27.
51: Sanz-Cortes, F., M.L. Badenes, S. Paz, A. Iniguez and G. Llacer, 2001. Molecular characterization of olive cultivars using RAPD markers. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 126: 7-12.
52: Shah, N.A., A. Ahmad, M. Saleem and S.M. Khair, 2002. Constraints and opportunities in the production and marketing of wild olive in highland Balochistan: Farmers perception. Asian J. Plant Sci., 1: 370-372.
CrossRef | Direct Link |
53: Sheidai, M., S. Vaezi-Joze, Z.H. Shahriari, Z. Noormohammadi, H. Parsian and F. Farahanei, 2007. Study of genetic diversity in some olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars by using RAPD markers. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 2972-2975.
CrossRef | PubMed | Direct Link |
54: Smouse, T.H., 1996. Significance of Lipid Oxidation to Food Processors. In: Food Lipids and Health, Mcdonald, R.E. and D.B. Min (Eds.). Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA., pp: 269-286.
55: Stanley, R.G. and H.F. Linskens, 1974. Pollen: Biology, Biochemistry, Management. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, ISBN-13: 9780387068275, Pages: 307.
56: Sweeney, S., 2003. The national olive variety assessment project. Report for the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. RIRDC Project NE SAR-23A, pp: 19.
57: Terzopoulos, P.J., B. Kolano, P.J. Bebeli, P.J. Kaltsikes and I. Metzidakis, 2005. Identification of Olea europaea L. using inter-simple sequence repeat markers. Sci. Horticult., 105: 45-51.
58: Tous, J. and A. Romero, 1993. Olive Varieties. La Caixa fondation, Barcelona, Spain..
59: Trujillo, I., L. Rallo and A. Arus, 1995. Identifying olive cultivars by isozyme analysis. J. Am. Soc. Hortic. Sci., 120: 318-324.
Direct Link |