• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. Journal of Entomology
  2. Vol 8 (3), 2011
  3. 218-228
  • Issues
    Online First Current Issue All Issues
  • Information About
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

Journal of Entomology

Year: 2011 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 218-228
DOI: 10.3923/je.2011.218.228

Facebook Twitter Reddit Linkedin E-mail
Google Scholar ASCI
Research Article

Response of Mexican Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Ticks to Selection by Amitraz and Genetic Analysis of Attained Resistance

H. Fragoso-Sanchez
Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, Unidad Xochimilco, Calzada del Hueso 1100, Col. Villa Quietud, Delegacion Coyoacan, C. P. 04960 Mexico, D.F.

Z. Garcia-Vazquez
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricola y Pecuario, Centro Nacional de Parasitologia Veterinaria (CENID-PAVET-INIFAP), Apartado Postal 206, CIVAC, C.P. 62550, Morelos, Mexico

G. Tapia-Perez
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Departamento de Genetica, Av. Universidad No. 2000, Ciudad Universitaria, Col. Coyoacan, C.P. 04150, Mexico. D.F.

A. Ortiz-Najera
Centro Nacional de Servicios de Constatacion en Salud Animal. SAGARPA. Km. 11.5 Carretera Federal Cuernavaca Cuautla. Colonia Progreso, C.P. 62550. Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico

R. Rosario-Cruz
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricola y Pecuario, Centro Nacional de Parasitologia Veterinaria (CENID-PAVET-INIFAP), Apartado Postal 206, CIVAC, C.P. 62550, Morelos, Mexico

I. Rodriguez-Vivas
Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia. Universidad Autonoma de Yucatan. Yucatan, Mexico

The aim of this study was to describe the genetics of amitraz resistance evolution and to obtain the independent genes number involved. Three Mexican R. microplus tick strains were used, one susceptible to all acaricides and two amitraz-resistant. Larvae were reared on isolated naïve-heifers and maintained nine generations in laboratory conditions. From each generation and each strain, the amitraz LC50 was chosen as the selection concentration for each strain. The control population of susceptible R. microplus ticks was maintained throughout the study. Genetic estimators were obtained. Selection of nine generations produced a 29-fold increase in resistance. Estimated h2 to amitraz resistance were 0.3057, 0.4348, 0.4863 with effective number of factors (genes) 6.31, 5.93, 6.69 and the numbers of generations required for 10-fold increase in LC50 were 10, 8 and 4 for susceptible Media Joya, Palenque and San Alfonso amitraz-resistant strains respectively. The increase in resistance in all the three selected strains showed that a part of the variation in amitraz resistance in R. microplus is additive. It is suggested that insecticide resistance against amitraz is controlled by almost completely recessive more than one gene. But these differences may not necessarily translate to field performance of this acaricide.
PDF Fulltext XML References Citation

How to cite this article

H. Fragoso-Sanchez, Z. Garcia-Vazquez, G. Tapia-Perez, A. Ortiz-Najera, R. Rosario-Cruz and I. Rodriguez-Vivas, 2011. Response of Mexican Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus Ticks to Selection by Amitraz and Genetic Analysis of Attained Resistance. Journal of Entomology, 8: 218-228.

DOI: 10.3923/je.2011.218.228

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=je.2011.218.228

Related Articles

Realized Heritability and Genetic Analysis of Insecticide Resistance in Whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.)
Cytochrome P-450 Monooxygenase Gene Expression Supports a Multifactorial Origin for Acaricide Resistance in Ripicephalus microplus

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Article Trend



Total views 2789

References


  1. Abbott, W.S., 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol., 18: 265-267.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  2. Bloch, G. and D. Wool, 1994. Methidathion resistance in the sweetpotato whitefly (Aleyrodidae: Homoptera) in Israel: Selection, heritability and correlated changes of esterase activity. J. Econ. Entomol., 87: 1147-1156.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  3. Bram, R.A., J.E. George, R.E. Reichard and W.J. Tabachnick, 2002. The threat of foreign arthropod-borne pathogens to livestock in the United States. J. Med.Entomol., 39: 405-416.
    PubMed

  4. Chen, A.C., H. He and R.D. Davey, 2007. Mutations in a putative octopamine receptor gene in amitraz-resistant cattle ticks. Vet. Parasitol, 148: 379-383.
    CrossRef

  5. Cossio-Bayugar, R., E. Miranda-Miranda, A. Ortiz-Najera, S. Neri-Orantes and F. Olvera-Valencia, 2008. Cytochrome P-450 monooxygenase gene expression supports a multifactorial origin for acaricide resistance in Ripicephalus microplus. Res. J. Parasitol., 3: 59-66.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  6. Denholm, I., R.M. Sawicki and A.W. Farnham, 1984. The relationship between insecticide resistance and control failure. Proceedings of the British Crop Protection Conference, November 19-22, 1984, BCPC, Croydon, UK., pp: 527-534.

  7. Falconer, D.S., 1989. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 3rd Edn., Longman Scientific and Technical, New York, USA Pages: 438.
    Direct Link

  8. Finney, D.J., 1971. Probit Analysis. 3rd Edn., University Press, London, UK, ISBN-13: 9780521080415, Pages: 333.
    Direct Link

  9. Firko, M.J. and J.L. Hayes, 1990. Quantitative genetic tools for insecticide resistance risk assessment: Estimating the heritability of resistance. J. Econ. Entomol., 83: 647-654.
    PubMed

  10. Foil, L.D., P. Coleman, M. Eisler, H. Fragoso-Sanchez and Z. Garcia-Vazquez et al., 2004. Factors that influence the prevalence of acaricide resistance and tick-borne diseases. Vet. Parasitol., 125: 163-181.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  11. Friedhoff, K.T. and R.D. Smith, 1981. Transmission of Babesia by Ticks. Babesiosis. Academic, New York, pp:267-321.

  12. Guo, P.Z., 1993. Quantitative Genetic Analysis. 2nd Edn., Capital Normal University Press, Beijing, China.

  13. Hartl, D.L., 1988. A Primer of Population Genetics. 2nd Edn., Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.

  14. Ives, A.R. and D.A. Andow, 2002. Evolution of resistance to Bt crops: Directional selection in structured environments. Ecol. Lett., 5: 792-801.
    CrossRef

  15. Kunz, S.E. and D.H. Kemp, 1994. Insecticides and acaricides: Resistance and environmental impacts. Rev. Sci. Tech. Off. Ini. Epiz., 13: 1249-1286.
    PubMed

  16. Lande, R., 1981. The minimum number of genes contributing to quantitative variation between and within populations. Genetics, 99: 541-553.
    Direct Link

  17. Le Ora Software, 1987. POLO-PC, A User Guide to Probit or Logit Analysis. LeOra Software, Berkeley, CA, USA.

  18. Li, A., R. Davey, R. Miller and J.E. George, 2005. Mode of inheritance of amitraz resistance in a Brazilian strain of the southern cattle tick, Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 37: 183-198.
    PubMed

  19. Lu, M.G., C.H. Rui, J.Z. Zhao, G.L. Jian, X.L. Fan and X.W. Gao, 2004. Selection and heritability of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis subsp kurstaki and transgenic cotton in Helicoverpa amigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manage. Sci., 60: 887-893.
    PubMed

  20. Rosado-Aguilar, J.A., R.I. Rodriguez-Vivas, Z. Garcia-Vazquez, H. Fragoso-Sanchez A. Ortiz-Najera and R. Rosario-Cruz, 2008. Development of amitraz resistance in field populations of Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) undergoing typical amitraz exposure in the Mexican tropics. Vet. Parasitol., 152: 349-353.
    PubMed

  21. Roush, R.T. and J.A. McKenzie, 1987. Ecological genetics of insecticide and acaricide resistance. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 32: 361-380.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  22. Ru, L.J., X.L. Fan, M.G. Lu, J.Z. Zhao and C. Wei, 1997. Realized heritability of resistance to pyrethroids in Helicoverpa armigera. Acta Phytophylacica Sinica, 24: 356-360.

  23. Sethi, A., M.S. Bons and V.K. Dilawari, 2008. Realized heritability and genetic analysis of insecticide resistance in whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn.). J. Entomol., 5: 1-9.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  24. Soberanes, M.J., V.M. Santamaria, S.H. Fragoso and Z.V. Garcia, 2002. First case reported of Amitraz resistance in the cattle tick Boophilus microplus in Mexico. Tec. Pecu. Mex., 40: 81-92.
    Direct Link

  25. Tabashnik, B.E. and W.H. McGaughey, 1994. Resistance risk assessment for single and multiple insecticides responses of Indian meal moth to Bacillus thuringiensis. J. Econ. Entomol., 87: 334-341.
    Direct Link

  26. Tabashnik, B.E., 1992. Resistance risk assessment: Realized heritability of resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis in diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Plutellidae), tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and colorado potato beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 85: 1551-1559.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  27. Tabashnik, B.E., 1991. Determining the mode of inheritance of pesticide resistance with backcross experiments. J. Econ. Entomol., 84: 703-712.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  28. Tapia-Perez, G., Z. Garcia-Vazquez, H. Montaldo and J.E. George, 2003. Inheritance of resistance to flumethrin in the Mexican Aldama strain of the cattle tick Boophilus microplus (Acari: Ixodidae). Exp. Appl. Acarol., 31: 135-149.
    PubMed

  29. Via, S., 1986. Quantitative genetic models and the evolution of pesticide resistance. Proceedings of the Pesticide Resistance: Strategies and Tactics for Management, (PRSTM'86), National Academy, Washington DC., USA., pp: 222-235.

Keywords


  • resistance gene number
  • heritability
  • acaricide resistance
  • Cattle tick
  • selection response

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved