Wu Chen
State Grid Energy Research Institute, Beijing, 100052, China
Yan Chang
School of Business, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, 100081, China
ABSTRACT
Management is also productive force and management systems and mechanisms determine the level of management efficiency directly. To improve the management level, companies must change management systems and mechanisms according to the internal and external situation constantly. On the basis of reviewing the technology innovation driven-force-model, this study summarizes the enterprise technology innovation driven-force-model literature and defines the connotation of the management system and mechanism. Then it formulates a nine factors driven-force-model for enterprise management system and mechanism innovation and applies it to the grid enterprise management system and mechanism innovation practices. And it carries out an application analysis using the State Grid Corporation of China (SGCC) as an example. It gives a thorough analysis of the management system and mechanism innovation implementation driven-forces of SGCC, which the core is Three-Intensive-Management and Five-Big-Systems (Three-Intensive-Management are human resource intensive management, financial intensive management and material procurement intensive management. Five-Big-Systems are big planning system, big construction system, big operation system, big maintenance system and big marketing system. Big means to build a system that can operate in the all organization layers smoothly). We try to provide a basis and framework for China's central enterprises to carry out management innovation.
PDF References Citation
How to cite this article
Wu Chen and Yan Chang, 2013. Analysis on Driven-force-mechanism of Management System and Mechanism Innovation
Based on Technology Innovation Driven-force-model in Grid Enterprises. Journal of Applied Sciences, 13: 3362-3372.
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2013.3362.3372
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2013.3362.3372
DOI: 10.3923/jas.2013.3362.3372
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=jas.2013.3362.3372
REFERENCES
- Acs, Z.J., L. Anselin and A. Varga, 2002. Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge. Res. Policy, 31: 1069-1085.
CrossRefDirect Link - Lehrer, M., A. Tylecote and E. Conesa, 1999. Corporate governance, innovation systems and industrial performance. Ind. Innov., 6: 20-25.
CrossRefDirect Link - Markman, G.D., D.B. Balkin and L. Schjoedt, 2001. Governing the innovation process in entrepreneurial firms. J. High Technol. Manage. Res., 12: 273-293.
CrossRefDirect Link - Rhyne, L.C., M.B. Teagarden and W. van den Panhuyzen, 2002. Technology-based competitive strategies: The relationship of cultural dimensions to new product innovation. J. High Technol. Manage. Res., 13: 249-277.
CrossRefDirect Link