P. Maharjan
Department of Poultry Science, Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR-72701, USA
T. Clark
Department of Poultry Science, Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR-72701, USA
M. Frank
Department of Poultry Science, Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR-72701, USA
B.B. Martins
Department of Poultry Science, Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR-72701, USA
M.K. Foy
Department of Poultry Science, Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR-72701, USA
S. Watkins
Department of Poultry Science, Center of Excellence for Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville, AR-72701, USA
ABSTRACT
Four commercially available hydrogen peroxide products were tested for residuals and efficacy over time. Each product was added at the rate of 59.14, 118.28 and 177.42 ml per 3780 ml of water creating stock solutions. Test solutions that actually mimic the bird drinking rate were made from each stock solution mixing at the rate of 29.57 ml of stock solution added to 3780 ml of water. Residual activities of test solutions prepared were measured from day 0 to day 5. Forty-eight hours post treatment, a 5 ml aliquot of water with a heavy microbial load was introduced into the test solutions as challenge and microbial plating for aerobic bacteria and mold was done for zero and one hour contact times. Results of this experiment suggest that an Effective Residual Concentration (ERC) of 25-50 ppm of hydrogen peroxide in test solution starts at 59. 14 ml of stock solution prepared for all products evaluated. Stabilized products stay at the higher residual level and can maintain ERC for a longer time than non-stabilized products. Significant bacterial reductions (p<0.05) within an hour of contact time was achieved at the lowest concentration tested, 59.14 ml of stock solution made, for all products provided that the ERC was maintained. Higher residuals or longer contact time were required for mold control.
PDF References Citation
How to cite this article
P. Maharjan, T. Clark, M. Frank, B.B. Martins, M.K. Foy and S. Watkins, 2015. Evaluating Different Hydrogen Peroxide Products for Residuals and Efficacy over Time. International Journal of Poultry Science, 14: 436-440.
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2015.436.440
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2015.436.440
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2015.436.440
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2015.436.440
REFERENCES
- Alasri, A., C. Roques, G. Michel, C. Cabassud and P. Aptel, 1992. Bactericidal properties of peracetic acid and hydrogen peroxide, alone and in combination and chlorine and formaldehyde against bacterial water strains. Can. J. Microbiol., 38: 635-645.
PubMedDirect Link - Carrique-Mas, J.J., C. Marin, M. Breslin, I. McLaren and R. Davies, 2009. A comparison of the efficacy of cleaning and disinfection methods in eliminating Salmonella spp. from commercial egg laying houses. Avian Pathol., 38: 419-424.
CrossRefDirect Link - Clark, T., B. Dean and S.E. Watkins, 2009. Evaluation of different hydrogen peroxide products for maintaining adequate sanitizing residual in water. Avian Advice, 11: 1-3.
Direct Link - De Velasquez, M.T.O., I. Yanez-noguez, B. Jimenez-Cisneros and V.M. Luna Pabello, 2008. Adding silver and copper to hydrogen peroxide and peracetic acid in the disinfection of an advanced primary treatment effluent. Environ. Technol., 29: 1209-1217.
CrossRefDirect Link - De Beer, D., R. Srinivasan and P.S. Stewart, 1994. Direct measurement of chlorine penetration into biofilms during disinfection. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 60: 4339-4344.
Direct Link - Finnegan, M., E. Linley, S.P. Denyer, G. McDonnell, C. Simons and J.Y. Maillard, 2010. Mode of action of hydrogen peroxide and other oxidizing agents: Differences between liquid and gas forms. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 65: 2108-2115.
CrossRefDirect Link - Gehan, Z.M., W. Anwer, H.M. Amer, I.M. El-Sabagh, A. Rezk and E.M. Badawy, 2009. In vitro efficacy comparisons of disinfectants used in the commercial poultry farms. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 8: 237-241.
CrossRefDirect Link - Galal-Gorchev, H., 1996. Chlorine in water disinfection. Pure Applied Chem., 68: 1731-1735.
CrossRefDirect Link - Hancock, A., J. Hughes and S. Watkins, 2007. In search of the ideal water line cleaner. Avian Advice, 9: 1-4.
Direct Link - McGuire, M.J., 2006. Eight revolutions in the history of US drinking water disinfection J. Am. Water Works Assoc., 3: 123-149.
Direct Link - Marin, C., A. Hernandiz and M. Lainez, 2009. Biofilm development capacity of Salmonella strains isolated in poultry risk factors and their resistance against disinfectants. Poult. Sci., 88: 424-431.
CrossRefDirect Link - Park, H., Y.C. Hung and D. Chung, 2004. Effects of chlorine and pH on efficacy of electrolyzed water for inactivating Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Listeria monocytogenes. Int. J. Food. Microbiol., 91: 13-18.
CrossRefDirect Link - Payment, P., 1999. Poor efficacy of residual chlorine disinfectant in drinking water to inactivate waterborne pathogens in distribution systems. Can. J. Microbiol., 45: 709-715.
CrossRefPubMedDirect Link - Pedahzur, R., O. Lev, B. Fattal and H.I. Shuval, 1995. The interaction of silver ions and hydrogen peroxide in the inactivation of E. coli: A preliminary evaluation of a new long acting residual drinking water disinfectant. Water Sci. Technol., 31: 123-129.
CrossRefDirect Link - Pedahzur, R., H.I. Shuval and S. Ulitzur, 1997. Silver and hydrogen peroxide as potential drinking water disinfectants: Their bactericidal effects and possible modes of action. Water Sci. Technol., 35: 87-93.
CrossRefDirect Link - Payne, J.B., E.C. Kroger and S.E. Watkins, 2005. Evaluation of disinfectant efficacy when applied to the floor of poultry grow-out facilities. J. Applied Poult. Res., 14: 322-329.
Direct Link - Ruano, M., J. El-Attrache and Pedrovillegas, 2001. Efficacy comparisons of disinfectants used by the commercial poultry industry. Avian Dis., 45: 972-977.
PubMedDirect Link - Robbins, J.B., C.W. Fisher, A.G. Moltz and S.E. Martin. 2005. Elimination of Listeria monocytogenes biofilms by ozone, chlorine and hydrogen peroxide. J. Food Prot., 68: 494-498.
PubMedDirect Link - Stern, N.J., M.C. Robach, N.A. Cox and M.T. Musgrove, 2002. Effect of drinking water chlorination on Campylobacter spp. colonization of broilers. Avian Dis., 46: 401-404.
Direct Link - Williams, C.L., G.T. Tabler and S.E. Watkins, 2013. Comparison of broiler flock daily water consumption and water-to-feed ratios for flocks grown in 1991, 2000-2001 and 2010-2011. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 22: 934-941.
CrossRefDirect Link - Wirtanen, G., S. Salo, I.M. Helander and T. Mattila-Sandholm, 2001. Microbiological methods for testing disinfectant efficiency on Pseudomonas biofilm. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces, 20: 37-50.
CrossRefDirect Link