Rachel L. Dennis
Livestock Behavior Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Department of Animal Science, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Heng W. Cheng
Livestock Behavior Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Department of Animal Science, Purdue University, W. Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
ABSTRACT
Beak trimming of the production laying hen has come under great scrutiny by welfare and consumer advocacy groups as a potential source of acute and chronic pain as well as having the potential to inhibit the freedom to express normal behaviors such as feeding behaviors. Although several studies have shown evidence of immediate pain response from beak trimming, the long term effects on bird welfare are not well understood. In the present study we investigated the force with which chicks peck during feeding. Chicks were beak trimmed using hot blade trimming at 2 days of age and were tested on a force plate at 3, 4 and 5 weeks of age. Both the time spent pecking and the forces of those pecks were measured. Beak trimmed birds spent significantly less time pecking at the feed and used less force than untrimmed birds at 3 weeks of age (p<0.05). However, at 4 and 5 weeks of age the difference was no longer significant (p>0.05). Beak trimmed birds also had a higher pecking ratio (peck force:time, p<0.05) than untrimmed birds. The difference was no longer apparent at 4 and 5 weeks of age (p>0.05). Our data suggest that beak trimming alters feeding behavior at a young age. However, changes in pecking force and time spent feeding were not long lasting and became similar to those of untrimmed birds after 3 weeks post-trimming.
PDF References
How to cite this article
Rachel L. Dennis and Heng W. Cheng, 2010. Effects of Beak Trimming on Pecking Force. International Journal of Poultry Science, 9: 863-866.
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.863.866
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2010.863.866
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2010.863.866
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2010.863.866
REFERENCES
- Anderson, R.A., L.D. McBrayer and A. Herrel, 2008. Bite force in vertebrates: Opportunities and caveats for use of a nonpareil whole-animal performance measure. Biol. J. Linnean Soc., 93: 709-720.
Direct Link - Cunningham, D.L., 1992. Beak trimming effects on performance, behavior and welfare of chickens: A review. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 1: 129-134.
Direct Link - Gentle, M.J., B.O. Hughes and R.C. Hubrecht, 1982. The effect of beak trimming on food intake, feeding behaviour and body weight in adult hens. Applied Anim. Ethol., 8: 147-159.
CrossRef - Herrel, A., J. Podos, S.K. Huber and A.P. Hendry, 2005. Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin=s finches: Implications for the evolution of beak shape. Functional Ethol., 19: 43-48.
Direct Link - Husak, J.F., A.K. Lappin, S.F. Fox and J.A. Lemos-Espinal, 2006. Bite-force performance predicts dominance in male venerable collared lizards (Crotaphytus antiquus). Copeia, 2: 301-306.
Direct Link - Jendral, M.J. and F.E. Robinson, 2004. Beak trimming in chickens: Historical, economical, physiological and welfare implications and alternatives for preventing feather pecking and cannibalistic activity. Avian Poult. Bio. Rev., 15: 9-23.
Direct Link - Sanderson, D.J. and P.E. Martin, 1997. Lower extremity kinematic and kinetic adaptations in unilateral below-knee amputees during walking. Gait Posture, 6: 126-136.
Direct Link - Sjodahl, C., G.B. Jarnlo, B. Soderberg and B.M. Persson, 2002. Kinematic and kinetic gait analysis in the sagittal plane of trans-femoral amputees before and after special gait re-education. Prosthet. Orthot. Int., 26: 101-112.
Direct Link - Van Swearingen, J., 2008. Facial rehabilitation: A neuromuscular reeducation, patient centered approach. Facial Plast. Surg., 24: 250-259.
PubMed