E. S. Pablo
Departamento de Produccion Agricola y Animal,Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, D.F. 04960, Mexico
A. L.M. Sandoval
Departamento de Produccion Agricola y Animal,Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, D.F. 04960, Mexico
M. R. Fernandez
Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Forestales Agricolas y Pecuarias CENIDParasitologia de Jiutepec, Morelos, Mexico
E. Morales
Departamento de Produccion Agricola y Animal,Universidad Autonoma Metropolitana, D.F. 04960, Mexico
O. Prado
Avicola Production Laboratory, FMVZ, University of Colima, Tecoman, Colima, 28100
G. Tellez
Department of Poultry Science, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville AR 72701, USA
M. T.M. Quintero
Departamento de Parasitologia, FMVZ, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, D.F. 04510, Mexico
ABSTRACT
In the present study, eighty-four Hy-Line W36 laying hens in two experiments were distributed in 7 treatments with 3 replicates of four hens each. Each treatment, hens received 3 dipping/2 min every 48 h. Residual activity was done by counting lice one month after dipping. Treated hens with no live lice were reinfested with 20 lice and repeated during three months. In experiment one, aqueous suspensions of three plant extracts were tested as dips for control of MS lice: a) Neem (Azadirachta indica) 500 ppm; b) Ruda (Ruta graveolens) 11,700 ppm; or c) Solanacea (Ardisia solanacea) 50,000 ppm; d) Negative Control (water). After the first dipping, a significant difference (p<0.05) in the number of dead lice were observed in the hens that received Neem (84.1%) or Solanacea (98.1%), however, after the second and third dipping, all treated groups showed a significant increase in the number of dead lice compared with the control. Average after the 3 dips was: Neem (93.6%); Ruda (85.2%); Solanacea (98.2%); Control (49.1%). One month later, all 3 treated groups had 0 lice compared with 38 lice in the control group. Counts of live lice at two months after first reinfestation were: Neem (0); Ruda (1); Solanacea (43); Control (51). Counts of live lice at three months after second reinfestation were: Neem (0); Ruda (15); Solanacea (NA); Control (60). In experiment two, 3 aqueous suspensions were tested: group 1) Ruda tincture 50,000 ppm; group 2) Coumaphos 1,000 ppm; or group 3) M. anisopliae 50,000 ppm. After the first dipping, a significant difference in the number of dead lice were observed in the hens that received Coumaphos (100 %), however, no significant differences were observed between treatments after the second and third dipping Counts of live lice one month later were: group 1 (2 lice); group 2 (0 lice); group 3 (38 lice). Counts of live lice at two months after first reinfestation were: group 1 (13) and group 2 (16). The results of the present study suggest that some alternative bio-control methods for lice in laying hens are effective.
PDF References Citation
How to cite this article
E. S. Pablo, A. L.M. Sandoval, M. R. Fernandez, E. Morales, O. Prado, G. Tellez and M. T.M. Quintero, 2009. Residual Activity of Metarhizium anisopliae or Plant Extracts on Laying Hens for Menacanthus stramineus Lice Control by Dipping. International Journal of Poultry Science, 8: 816-819.
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2009.816.819
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2009.816.819
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2009.816.819
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2009.816.819
REFERENCES
- Bradley, A., J.P. Mullens, O. Douglas, R. Kuney, C.E. Szijj and K.A. Klingler, 2009. Temporal changes in distribution, prevalence and intensity of Northern fowl mite (Ornithonyssus sylviarum) parasitism in commercial caged laying hens, with a comprehensive economic analysis of parasite impact. Vet. Parasitol., 160: 116-133.
CrossRef - Chauve, C., 1998. The poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (De Geer, 1778): Current situation and future prospects for control. Vet. Parasitol., 79: 239-245.
CrossRef - Fabiyi, J.P., 1996. Association between duration of humid season and geographical distribution patterns of different species of chewing lice (Mallophaga: Insecta) infesting domestic chickens in Nigeria. J. Parasitol., 82: 1034-1036.
Direct Link - George, D.R., K. Callaghan, J.H. Guy and O.A. Sparagano, 2008. Lack of prolonged activity of lavender essential oils as acaricides against the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae under laboratory conditions. Res. Vet. Sci., 85: 540-542.
CrossRef - Hamscher, G., B. Priess and H. Nau, 2007. Determination of phoxim residues in eggs by using high-performance liquid chromatography diode array detection after treatment of stocked housing facilities for the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae. Anal. Chim. Acta, 586: 330-335.
Direct Link - Meyer-Kuhling, B., K. Pfister, J.M. Lindloff and J.H. Field, 2007. Efficacy of phoxim 50% (ByeMite®) against the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae in battery cages stocked with laying hens. Vet. Parasitol., 147: 289-296.
CrossRef - Nordenfors, H., J. Hoglund, R. Tauson and J. Chirico, 2001. Effect of permethrin impregnated plastic strips on Dermanyssus gallinae in loose-housing systems for laying hens. Vet. Parasitol., 102: 121-131.
CrossRef - Prelezov, P.N. and N.I. Groseva, 2006. Goundasheva, Pathomorphological changes in the tissues of chickens, experimentally infected with biting lice (Insecta: Phthiraptera). Vet. Arhiv, 76: 207-215.
Direct Link - Sychra, O., P. Harmat and I. Literak, 2008. Chewing lice (Phthiraptera) on chickens (Gallus gallus) from small backyard flocks in the Eastern part of the Czech Republic. Vet. Parasitol., 152: 344-348.
Direct Link - Thind, B.B. and H.L. Ford, 2007. Assessment of susceptibility of the poultry red mite Dermanyssus gallinae (Acari: Dermanyssidae) to some acaricides using an adapted filter paper based bioassay. Vet. Parasitol., 144: 344-348.
CrossRef - Trivedi, M.C., B.S. Rawat and A.K. Saxena, 1991. The distribution of lice (Phthiraptera) on poultry Gallus domesticus. Int. J. Parasitol., 21: 247-249.
PubMedDirect Link - Vreeken-Buijs, M.J., J. Hassink and L. Brussaard, 1998. Relationships of soil microarthropod biomass with organic matter and pore size distribution in soils under different land use. Soil Biol. Biochem., 30: 97-106.
CrossRef