Chilli plants have many mechanism defenses to pathogen attack. The biotic stress can induce genes encoding Pathogenesis Related (PR) proteins to increase expression. The aim of this research is to analyze a molecular responds of CaChi2 gene as PR protein in chilli, which is infected by fungal pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum. Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was used to measure the fluorescence and the ddCt method was used to analyze the expression level of CaChi2 in chilli. The result showed, up-regulated expression of resistant plants but no change in expression of susceptible plants after many range of time. It is concluded that the CaChi2 gene can be a molecular marker of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum in chilli.
How to cite this article:
Rejeki Siti Ferniah, Rina Sri Kasiamdari, Achmadi Priyatmojo and Budi Setiadi Daryono, 2015. Expression of Class II Chitinase Gene in Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) as Response to Fusarium oxysporum Pathogen Attack. Asian Journal of Plant Pathology, 9: 142-147.
Plants have many mechanisms to defense from pathogen attack. Biochemical defense is developed by producing degradation enzymes to press or to kill their pathogen. One of the degradation enzymes is chitinase. The plant chitinase degrades β-1-4-N-acetylglucosamine that compose the fungal cell wall (Hong and Hwang, 2005; Ahmed et al., 2012b). The chitinase gene can be found specifically on certain tissue or constitutively on all tissues (Kasprzewska, 2003). Chitinase is expressed constitutively at a low level but can be induced by pathogen infection (Hong and Hwang, 2005).
Chitinase is a Pathogenesis Related (PR) protein of plants. The PR protein expression can be induced by biotic or abiotic factors ( Hong and Hwang, 2005; Ahmed et al., 2012a). The pathogenic fungi with chitin cell wall is one of an inducer to plant chitinase expression. Fusarium oxysporum infection has induced many isozyme of chitinase in tomato (Chaiyawat et al., 2008), whereas Collelotrichum coccoides has induced chitinase and β-1-3-glucanase expression in chilli (Hong and Hwang, 2005). The chitinase expression in infected Acacia coa, Brassica rapa and transgenic tobacco enhanced the plant resistance to pathogenic Fusarium attack (Ntui et al., 2011; Ahmed et al., 2012b; Rushanaedy et al., 2012).
Study of molecular genetic on disease resistance is important in plant biology. Two reasons for renewing this study are the limitation of financial resources in pesticides or fungicides dependently and the considerable environmental damage. This research will study chitinase expression in chilli quantitatively based on real time PCR technique. The qRT-PCR is sensitive enough to quantify mRNA level and widely used in plant responses to biotic or abiotic stresses (Pulla et al., 2011; Orlowska et al., 2012). By this technique, the target gene was specific and measured "real time" so, the result will be more accurate.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Plant materials: Plant materials were TM999 (seeds produced by Seminis, Monsanto, Korea), Lembang-1 and Kencana (seeds produced by Crops Research Institute, Lembang, Indonesia), Cipanas, Branang and Gantari cultivar (seeds produced by Horticulture Research and Development Institute, Ngipiksari, Yogyakarta, Indonesia) that grown in sterile soil.
Fungal inoculation and disease severity index of plant: Fusarium oxysporum was grown in PDB for 4 days. Conidia densities were calculated using haemacytometer and adjusted to 106 conidia mL1. The conidia were inoculated in chilli plant by root dip method (Herman and Perl-Treves, 2007; Karimi et al., 2010). One month healthy chilli plants were dug from the soil, root were rinsed in water, soaked in 1% chlorox for 1 min, rinsed with sterile water and then soaked in fungal suspension for 30 min. This treatments were done for 10 plants of each cultivar. Soaking root of health plant in sterile water was done as control. After that, each plant was planted in sterile soil in polybags. Disease symptoms were observed every odd days post inoculation (dpi) for 15 dpi. Symptoms were remarked by scoring. Score 0 = No symptom, 1 = Lower height compared to control, 2 = Lower height and chlorosis, 3 = 10% chlorosis and/or 10% wilting, 4 = 11-25% wilting, 5 = 26-50% wilting and 6 = 51-100% wilting and dead. The Disease Severity Index (DSI) was determined (Wongpia and Lomthaisong, 2010):
The treatments repeated three replicates with ten plants of each replicate. Based on their DSI, plants were categorized as Very Resistant (VR) if 0<DSI≤5%, Resistant (R) if 5<DSI≤10%, Susceptible (S) if 10<DSI≤30% and Very Susceptible (VS) if 30<DSI≤100% (Suryotomo, 2006). One way ANOVA and Duncan test were used to analyze the result.
RNA isolation and one step qRT-PCR: The RNA isolation and gene expression analysis were done at 0, 4 and 15 dpi. The RNA isolation was done from 30-50 mg leaves of resistant and susceptible cultivar with total RNA mini kit plant (Geneaid)according to the protocol. The quantity and quality of the RNA were measured by nanovue spectrophotometer.
The RNA were amplified by qRT-PCR through one step qRT-PCR with KAPA SYBR Fastone step qRT-PCRkit (KAPA Biosystems), according to the protocol. The 18S rRNA gene was used as, normalized gene and the CaChi2 gene as target gene (gene of interest = GOI). Primer pairs to qRT-PCR were 18n for normalized gene and c2p for target gene. Sequences of the primers were forward 18n 5 GGGCGACTAATGAACCCCAA 3 and reverse 18n 5 AAGCACACGTCCGCTTGATA 3 with 103 bp PCR product, forward c2p 5 CACCAGCAGATAGGTCAGCA 3 and reverse c2 p5 TCCAGTGG GAACATTCAACA 3 with 158 bp PCR product. Amplifications were done by Rotor GeneQ 5 Plex (Qiagen). One step qRT-PCR was programmed at 42°C-5 min mn for cDNA synthesis, 95°C-3 min mn for inactivate RT, with 40 cycles amplification at 95°C-3 sec for denaturation, 55°C-20 sec for annealing and 72°C-30 sec for extension.
Chitinase gene expressions of the treated plant were compared to the control plant as calibrator. Analysis of the expression based on the Ct values of GOI and normalized gene. The Ct values were analyzed by delta Ct method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001) with rotor geneQ software version 2.1.1.
Pathogenic F. oxysporum caused wilting of the chilli plants. Among six cultivars in this research, there were not fully resistant of the plants. The symptoms were developed since 3 dpi to death at 15 dpi in susceptible plants. Based on the DSI at 15 dpi, Branang cultivar was resistant with DSI 5,7% and Lembang-1 was very susceptible with DSI 34,4%. First symptom and DSI values of six cultivars were shown in Table 1. Symptom observation on Branang and Lembang-1 were shown in Fig. 1.
There were many differences between a resistant plant and a susceptible plant in response to the Fusarium oxysporum pathogen attack. The first symptom in susceptible plant was seen at earlier time compared to the resistant plant. Root of the resistant plant grew densely, white and healthy but thin and brown in the susceptible plant.
Disease severity index of chilli plants at 15 dpi as response to pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum
*Number with the same letter in this column means not difference statistically with p<0.05, **S: susceptible, VS: Very susceptible, R: Resistant
Symptom observation in Branang (a) Resistant plant (b) Lembang-1 (very susceptible plant)
Product amplification of 18S rRNA gene as normalizer. M: 100 bp DNA ladder, C: Untreated plant, R: Resistant plant, S: Susceptible plant
Relative expression level of CaChi2 gene in chilli plants after 0, 4 and 15 dpi of F. oxysporum infection. Br: Branang as resistant cultivar, L1: Lembang-1 as very susceptible cultivar. The error bars represent the standard error of the means of five replicates
Stem of the resistant plant was strong without necrosis but stem of the susceptible plant was weak and there was necrosis (browning) at the basal of the stem. Necrosis on the basal stem was a specific marker in Fusarium wilt of plants (Agrios, 2005). Leaf of the resistant plant was green and healthy but leaf of the susceptible plant was wilting.
Chitinase gene expression was measured quantitatively based on Ct values of the normalized gene and the CaChi2 as target gene. The 18S rRNA gene was used as normalized gene in this research, because the gene was expressed constitutively in the resistant plants, susceptible plants and untreated plants (Fig. 2). The Ct values of the 18S rRNA gene were used to normalize the target gene in delta-delta Ct method. Use of the 18S rRNA gene conformed with previous research on chitinase study in Acacia coa infected by F. oxysporum (Rushanaedy et al., 2012).
Based on delta-delta Ct method, there was a different profile between resistant plant and susceptible plant. Figure 3 showed the CaChi2 expression level of the resistant and susceptible plant.
This result showed there was up-regulation on CaChi2 gene in resistant plants but not in susceptible plants. It was confirm with previous research that expression of chitinase gene against phyto-pathogen systems is higher and induction is stronger in the resistant plants compared to susceptible plants.
Chitinase is one of the Pathogenesis Related (PR) proteins that induced by pathogen attack. Expression of the PR genes usually increases after pathogen infection (Ahmed et al., 2012a). Pathogen needs time to penetrate their host plant, so the expression didnt start increasing at the earlier time. The recognition of the pathogen infection by host resistance genes should send signals to initiate various defense responses (Yu et al., 2010). Study in wheat leaf concluded that there was no difference in chitinase expression of resistant and susceptible plant until 72 hpi (Mohammadi et al., 2002). In that study, the symptoms could be observed visually in most susceptible plants after 3 dpi (72 hpi), when their hypersusceptible response started occur in host plants and the chitinase gene expression difference could be observed after 4 dpi.
Chitin in the fungal cell wall induced plant chitinase to be expressed highly at early infection (0-4 dpi) in resistant plant. The chitinase enzyme degraded fungal cell wall until the dead of the fungi. The chitinase expression was declined at the later (15 dpi) to basal level because of the death of the pathogen. This is confirm to the previous research in grape that the induction was steeply up to 4 dpi and declined to the basal level after 7 dpi in the resistant plant. Chitinase expression in Sesbania rostrata increased at 2 dpi but decreased after 7 dpi as a response to Azorhizobium caulinodans symbiont (Goormachtig et al., 1998). According to Goormachtig et al. (1998), plant chitinase was produced, as a molecular response to another organism of a plant.
The susceptible plants could not up-regulated the chitinase expression so they failed to degrade fungal cell wall. The fungus penetrated in plants and colonized there but plant chitinase of susceptible plant could not degrade it. Expression level of the chitinase gene was not different compared to the untreated plant.
The expression level of chitinase gene in this research conformed to many previous researches. The chitinase was up-regulated in resistant plant of wheat, rice, grape and Acacia coa (Mohammadi et al., 2002; Shrestha et al., 2008; Vasanthaiah et al., 2010; Rushanaedy et al., 2012) but there was no increase in the susceptible plant. Shrestha et al. (2008) and Orlowska et al. (2012) showed that chitinase gene was induced in both resistant and susceptible plant but was induced at earlier time point in resistant compared to susceptible plant. According to that research studies, the chitinase gene is used to molecular biomarker in plant resistance against pathogenic fungi (Orlowska et al., 2012; Rushanaedy et al., 2012). Over expression of the gene can enhance the resistance against their pathogens. Response of chitinase gene in leaves as non-infected area can be used to quick analysis of the plant resistance without killed the plants.
This research is funded by the Doctoral Dissertation Research Program, Ministry of Education Republic of Indonesia 2014, number DIPA-023.04.02.189185/2014.
Agrios, G.N., 2005. Plant Pathology. 5th Edn., Academic Press, London, ISBN-13: 978-0120445653, Pages: 952.
Ahmed, N.U., J.I. Park, H.J. Jung, K.K. Kang, Y. Hur, Y.P. Lim and I.S. Nou, 2012. Molecular characterization of stress resistance-related chitinase genes of Brassica rapa. Plant Physiol. Biochem., 58: 106-115.
Ahmed, N.U., J.I. Park, M.S. Seo, T.S. Kumar, I.H. Lee, B.S. Park and I.S. Nou, 2012. Identification and expression analysis of chitinase genes related to biotic stress resistance in Brassica. Mol. Biol. Rep., 39: 3649-3657.
Chaiyawat, P., C. Boonchitsirikul and K.S. Lomthaisong, 2008. An investigation of a defensive chitinase against Fusarium oxysporum in pepper leaf tissue. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol., 2: 150-158.
Goormachtig, S., S. Lievens, W. van de Velde, M. van Montagu and M. Holsters, 1998. Srchi13, a novel early nodulin from Sesbania rostrata, is related to acidic class III chitinases. Plant Cell, 10: 905-915.
Herman, R. and R. Perl-Treves, 2007. Characterization and inheritance of a new source of resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. melonis race 1.2 in Cucumis melo. Plant Dis., 91: 1180-1186.
Hong, J.K. and B.K. Hwang, 2005. Functional characterization of PR-1 protein, β-1,3-glucanase and chitinase genes during defense response to biotic and abiotic stresses in Capsicum annuum. Plant Pathol. J., 21: 195-206.
Karimi, R., J.O. Owuoche and S.N. Silim, 2010. Inheritance of fusarium wilt resistance in pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millspaugh]. Indian J. Genet. Plant Breed., 70: 271-276.
Kasprzewska, A., 2003. Plant chitinases-regulation and function. Cell. Mol. Biol. Lett., 8: 809-824.
Livak, K.J. and T.D. Schmittgen, 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods, 25: 402-408.
Mohammadi, M., R. Roohparvar and M. Torabi, 2002. Induced chitinase activity in resistant wheat leaves inoculated with an incompatible race of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici, the causal agent of yellow rust disease. Mycopathologia, 154: 119-126.
Ntui, V.O., P. Azadi, G. Thirukkumaran, R.S. Khan, D.P. Chin, I. Nakamura and M. Mii, 2011. Increased resistance to fusarium wilt in transgenic tobacco lines co-expressing chitinase and wasabi defensin genes. Plant Pathol., 60: 221-231.
Orlowska, E., A. Fiil, H.G. Kirk, B. Llorente and C. Cvitanich, 2012. Differential gene induction in resistant and susceptible potato cultivars at early stages of infection by Phytophthora infestans. Plant Cell Rep., 31: 187-203.
Pulla, R.K., O.R. Lee, J.G. In, S. Parvin and Y.J. Kim et al., 2011. Identification and characterization of class I chitinase in Panax ginseng C. A. Meyer. Mol. Biol. Rep., 38: 95-102.
Rushanaedy, I., T.C. Jones, N.S. Dudley, R.J.F. Liao, R. Agbayani and D. Borthakur, 2012. Chitinase is a potential molecular biomarker for detecting resistance to Fusarium oxysporum in Acacia koa. Trop. Plant Biol., 5: 244-252.
Shrestha, C.L., I. Ona, S. Muthukrishnan and T.W. Mew, 2008. Chitinase levels in rice cultivars correlate with resistance to the sheath blight pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 120: 69-77.
Suryotomo, B., 2006. Ketahanan alami beberapa genotipe cabai (Capsicum annuum L.) terhadap penyakit antraknosa. Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi Indonesia, 8: 1-6.
Vasanthaiah, H.K.N., S.M. Basha and R. Katam, 2010. Differential expression of chitinase and stilbene synthase genes in Florida hybrid bunch grapes to Elsinoe ampelina infection. Plant Growth Regul., 61: 127-134.
Wongpia, A. and K. Lomthaisong, 2010. Changes in the 2DE protein profiles of chilli pepper (Capsicum annuum) leaves in response to Fusarium oxysporum infection. ScienceAsia, 36: 259-270.
Yu, X., X. Wang, C. Wang, X. Chen and Z. Qu et al., 2010. Wheat defense genes in fungal (Puccinia striiformis) infection. Funct. Integr. Genomics, 10: 227-239.