• [email protected]
  • +971 507 888 742
Submit Manuscript
SciAlert
  • Home
  • Journals
  • Information
    • For Authors
    • For Referees
    • For Librarian
    • For Societies
  • Contact
  1. International Journal of Poultry Science
  2. Vol 8 (5), 2009
  3. 452-456
  • Online First
  • Current Issue
  • Previous Issues
  • More Information
    Aims and Scope Editorial Board Guide to Authors Article Processing Charges
    Submit a Manuscript

International Journal of Poultry Science

Year: 2009 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 5 | Page No.: 452-456
DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2009.452.456
crossmark

Facebook Twitter Digg Reddit Linkedin StumbleUpon E-mail
Research Article

Performance, Breast Morphological and Carcass Traits in the Ardennaise Chicken Breed

J.M. Lariviere, F. Farnir, J. Detilleux, C. Michaux, V. Verleyen and P. Leroy

ABSTRACT


The aim of this study was to quantify performance, breast morphological and carcass traits in Belgium’s most ancient chicken breed: the Ardennaise. Evaluation during growing showed at 84 days of age light as-hatched mean live Body Weights (BW) (1115g ± 221), fairly high Feed Conversion Ratio (FCR) (5.09 ± 0.4) and Liveability (LIV) (92.55% ± 4.6). At 85 days, male and female in vivo breast measurements such as Keel Angle (KA) (67.74-71.82o), Thoracic Circumference (TC) (25.61-28.05 cm), Keel Length (KL) (10.32-11.26 cm) and muscle thickness (TM) (10.70-12.11mm), with associated BW, were all greater in males and significantly different between sexes (p<0.001), except for Chest Width (CW) (4.62-5.35 cm). However, there was no sexual dimorphism for all yield traits. Yields of Eviscerated Carcass (EC) varied from 57.54-59.28%, Thighs and Drumsticks (TD) from 19.37-19.80%, Breast Meat (BM) from 11.02-11.62% and Wings (WI) from 8.67-8.82%. All in vivo measurements, carcass and portions data were lower than those reported mostly for broilers, except similar KA degrees and slightly higher WI. Finally, most of traits studied in the Ardennaise chicken were moderate when compared to those obtained by broilers.
PDF References Citation

How to cite this article

J.M. Lariviere, F. Farnir, J. Detilleux, C. Michaux, V. Verleyen and P. Leroy, 2009. Performance, Breast Morphological and Carcass Traits in the Ardennaise Chicken Breed. International Journal of Poultry Science, 8: 452-456.

DOI: 10.3923/ijps.2009.452.456

URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=ijps.2009.452.456

REFERENCES


  1. Aviagen, T.M., 2002. Chick management. Ross Broiler Management Manual.

  2. Bordas, A., P. Merat, D. Sergent and F.H. Ricard, 1978. Influence of the naked neck gene Na on growth, food consumption and body composition of chicken depending on temperature. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim., 10: 209-231.

  3. Cheema, M.A., M.A. Qureshi and G.B. Havenstein, 2003. A comparison of the immune response of a 2001 commercial broiler with a 1957 randombred broiler strain when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult. Sci., 82: 1519-1529.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  4. Gardiner, E.E., J.R. Hunt and R.C. Newberry, 1988. Relationship between age, body weight and season of the year and the incidence of sudden death syndrome in male broiler chickens. Poult. Sci., 67: 1243-1249.

  5. Grashorn, M.G. and G. Clostermann, 2002. Performances and slaughter characteristics of broiler breeds for extensive production. Arch. Geflugelkunde, 66: 173-181.
    Direct Link

  6. Griffin, A.M., R.A. Renema, F.E. Robinson and M.J. Zuidhof, 2005. The influence of rearing light period and the use of broiler or broiler breeder diets on forty-two day body weight, fleshing and flock uniformity in broiler stocks. J. Applied Poult. Res., 14: 204-216.
    Direct Link

  7. Guerder, F., P.F. Koehl and S. Prin, 1998. Performance and production costs for rearing pullets. National Meeting for Egg Production, Ploufragan.

  8. Han, P.F.S. and J.R. Smyth, 1972. The influence of growth rate on the development of marek's disease in chickens. Poult. Sci., 51: 975-985.
    PubMedDirect Link

  9. Havenstein, G.B., P.R. Ferket and M.A. Qureshi, 2003. Carcass composition and yield of 1957 versus 2001 broilers when fed representative 1957 and 2001 broiler diets. Poult. Sci., 82: 1509-1518.
    CrossRefPubMedDirect Link

  10. Komender, P. and M.A. Grashorn, 1990. Ultrasonic measurement of breast meat. Poult. Int., 29: 36-40.

  11. Konig, T., M.A. Grashorn and W. Bessei, 1997. Estimation of breast meat yield in living broilers using B-Scan sonography. First report: Defining sites of measurement. Arch. Geflugelkunde, 61: 227-231.
    Direct Link

  12. Lariviere, J.M. and P. Leroy, 2007. Status and conservation of native poultry breeds in Belgium. Ann. Anim. Sci., 1: 87-91.

  13. Lariviere, J.M. and P. Leroy, 2006. Presumed genotypes from associated phenotypic traits in Belgian chicken breeds. Proceedings of the 12th European Poultry Conference World's Poultry Science Association, (EPCWPSA'06), Verona, pp: 218-219.

  14. Lariviere, J.M., C. Michaux, J. Detilleux, F. Farnir, M. Vandenheede, V. Verleyen and P. Leroy, 2007. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the Ardennaise chicken breed. Proceedings of the 5th European Poultry Genetics Symposium World's Poultry Science Association, (EPGSWPSA'07), Braedstrup, pp: 218-219.

  15. Lariviere, J.M., C. Michaux, V. Verleyen, C. Hanzen and P. Leroy, 2007. Comparison of non-invasive methods to predict breast muscle weight in slow-growing chickens. Proceeding of the 15th European Symposium on the Quality of Poultry Meat and 12th European Symposium on the Quality of Eggs and Egg Products, Sept. 2-5, Prague, pp: 262-263.

  16. Prin, S. and P.F. Koehl, 1998. Evolution of technical performance and production costs in meat poultry. National Meeting for Poultry Meat Production (Results 1997), Rennes.

  17. Remignon, H., F. Seigneurin and F. Moati, 2000. In vivo assessment of the quantity of breast muscle by sonography in broilers. Meat Sci., 56: 133-138.
    CrossRefDirect Link

  18. Ricard, F.H. and R. Rouvier, 1970. Study of anatomical composition of chicken. Ann. Genet. Sel. Anim., 1: 151-165.

  19. Boichard, M.T., A. Audiot, R. Bernigaud and X. Rognon, 2006. Valorization of old chicken breeds: Social, economic, technical, genetic and legal factors. Proceedings of the 6th Actes du Bureau des Ressources Genetiques, (ABRG'06), La Rochelle, pp: 495-520.

  20. Yang, N. and R.S. Jiang, 2005. Recent advances in breeding for quality chickens. World Poult. Sci. J., 61: 373-381.
    Direct Link

  21. Yunis, R., A. Ben-David, E.D. Heller and A. Cahaner, 2000. Immunocompetence and viability under commercial conditions of broiler group differing in growth rate and in antibody response to Escherichia coli vaccine. Poult. Sci., 79: 810-816.
    Direct Link

  22. Rauw, W.M., E. Kanis, E.N. Noordhuizen-Stassen and F.J. Grommers, 1998. Undesirable side effects of selection for high production efficiency in farm animals: A review. Livest. Prod. Sci., 56: 15-33.
    CrossRef

Related Articles

Leave a Comment


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Useful Links

  • Journals
  • For Authors
  • For Referees
  • For Librarian
  • For Socities

Contact Us

Office Number 1128,
Tamani Arts Building,
Business Bay,
Deira, Dubai, UAE

Phone: +971 507 888 742
Email: [email protected]

About Science Alert

Science Alert is a technology platform and service provider for scholarly publishers, helping them to publish and distribute their content online. We provide a range of services, including hosting, design, and digital marketing, as well as analytics and other tools to help publishers understand their audience and optimize their content. Science Alert works with a wide variety of publishers, including academic societies, universities, and commercial publishers.

Follow Us
© Copyright Science Alert. All Rights Reserved