ABSTRACT
Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration was achieved from immature embryos of six maize (Zea mays L.) inbred lines (CML216, CML78, CML331, TL18, TL27 and MU25). Callus was initiated on N6 medium supplemented with different concentrations of 2,4-D, 3% sucrose, 10 mg L-1 silver nitrate, 100 mg L-1 casein hydrolysate and 2.875 mg L-1 proline. Embryogenic callus was formed within two weeks of culture in callus maintenance medium. The concentration of 2,4-D, genotype and age of embryos had a significant effect (p<0.5) on the percentage of primary and embryogenic callus formed. The induction of primary callus ranged between 0 and 97% and embryogenic callus ranged between 0 and 70%. Somatic embryos were matured on N6 medium supplemented with 6% sucrose and 1 mg L-1 NAA. Embryogenic calli formed plantlets when it was transferred into the regeneration medium containing MS medium supplemented with 3% sucrose. The number of shoots formed ranged from 0 to 9.5 per plate. Callus initiation and plant regeneration were genotype dependent. CML216 had the highest number of shoots formed per culture. Regenerated plants were transferred into half MS medium supplemented with IBA for the development of healthy roots. Regenerated plants were successfully transferred into the greenhouse and into the field and they grew to maturity and set seeds in Ro and R1 generations.
PDF Abstract XML References Citation
How to cite this article
DOI: 10.3923/biotech.2008.224.232
URL: https://scialert.net/abstract/?doi=biotech.2008.224.232
INTRODUCTION
Maize (Zea mays L.) (2n = 20) is the most important staple human food crop in Kenya in semi-arid areas, medium and high potential regions (Ngugi, 2002). Over 90% of the country`s rural population feed on maize. The annual consumption is approximately 125 kg per capita in Kenya (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center, 2000). Maize is also an important animal feed and provides about 70% of rural employment. Maize ranks third after rice and wheat globally. It occupies a larger area than any other crop; hence it holds a key position in Kenya`s economy.
Despite great effort made to increase maize production by use of conventional breeding in Kenya the demand has occasionally outstripped the supply due to various constraints such as drought, pests, diseases, weeds (Striga) and low soil fertility (Conway and Toenniessen, 2003; Kiiya et al., 2002; Mwangi and Ely, 2001; Bosquiz-Pérez et al., 1998). Conventional breeding has not been successful in increasing maize production. This has led to significant dependence on importation of large quantities of maize grains yet the country has the potential of sustainable production of the crop. Hence there is need to produce maize genotypes which are adapted to biotic and abiotic constraints. Transfer of transgenes by conventional breeding methods is laborious, time and space consuming and the recovery of progeny with transgenic and important agronomic traits is difficult due to incompatible heterotic groups and combining ability. Tissue culture and genetic transformation are the other techniques which can be used to complement conventional breeding to achieve increased and sustainable maize varieties in a relatively shorter time and will be of value on agricultural food industry. By use of genetic transformation, it is now possible to transfer desirable genes by the use of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to produce transgenic plants which are resistant to the production constraints.
An efficient in vitro regeneration system of the whole plant is often the limiting step in the application of genetic transformation technique for crop improvement of most of the maize genotypes. An efficient plant regenerative system through somatic embryogenesis is important for gene manipulation and improvement of maize by use of A. tumefaciens. This is because somatic embryos can be induced, repetitively and can also germinate into plantlets. Tissue culture technique has been used for successful in vitro regeneration of maize in some temperate and tropical maize genotypes from a range of tissues, such as pollen (He et al., 2006), pollinated ovaries (Tang et al., 2006), split seed (Al-Abed et al., 2006), mature embryo (Huang and Wei, 2004), immature embryo (Oduor et al., 2006; El-Itriby et al., 2003; Santos-Serejo and Aguiar-Perecin, 2000; Carvolho et al., 1997; Bohorova et al., 1995), shoot tips (O`Connor-Sánchez et al., 2002), shoot apical meristems (Zhang et al., 2002) through somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis. Although there are various reports on successful regeneration of maize, these are often limited to particular genotypes. Maize genotypes have a large variation in their competence to regenerate plantlets. Hence most of the lines remain inaccessible to improvement using genetic transformation techniques. Most of the genotypes fail to produce embryogenic callus from competent tissues or they fail to regenerate since they are recalcitrant in vitro response. The differences are associated with susceptibility to genetic programming and reprogramming of the competent cells to internal and external factors. Although regenerable maize embryogenic callus has been induced from various meristematic tissues, immature embryos have been shown to be most efficient in their regeneration competence as they contain a large number of actively dividing cells. In Kenya, regeneration has been reported in only four maize genotypes out of many which are available (Oduor et al., 2006). The response of maize tissues in culture is genotype dependent. Therefore there is need to assess a wide range of genotypes to identify those with high regenerative response which can be used during genetic transformation. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of tropical maize inbred lines available in Kenya has not yet been reported in the literature, hence up to date little is known about their response in tissue culture.
The build up of knowledge on the regenerative response of maize could not only be important for improvement of tissue culture response of elite genotypes but will also accelerate their improvement via genetic transformation technology. The objective of the present study was to assess callus initiation and plant regenerative response of six tropical inbred lines from immature embryos.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Seeds of inbred lines (TL18, TL27 and MU25) were obtained from Kenya Agricultural Research Institute and three inbred lines (CML216, CML78 and CML331) from International Maize and Wheat Improvement Centre. The study was carried out between March 2006 and October 2007. Seeds were planted in the Plant and Microbial Sciences Research farm, Kenyatta University. Ears were covered with clear polythene bags until the emergence of the silk to avoid foreign pollen contamination. Self- or sib-pollination was done and ears were covered with the pollination bags to avoid cross pollination.
Ears were harvested 16 and 20 days after pollination (DAP). The ears were dehusked and surface sterilized for 5 min in 70% (v/v) ethanol and then for 20 min in 2.5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite, wetting with two drops of Tween 20. This was followed by five times rinse in sterile distilled water. Immature embryos (1-2.5 mm) were aseptically isolated by cutting the tips of the kernels with a scapel without touching the embryo according to procedures used by Jiménez and Bangerth (2001). The embryos were placed with embryo axis in contact with Callus Initiation Medium (CIM) containing N6 medium (Chu et al., 1975) supplemented with 100 mg L-1 casein hydrolysate, 2.875 mg L-1 L-proline, 10 mg L-1 silver nitrate, 3% (w/v) sucrose and 0-20 mg L-1 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid) and 0.3% (w/v) gerlite. The media was autoclaved at 121°C for 20 minutes at a pressure of 1.06 kg cm-2 after adjusting the pH to 5.8 with 1N NaOH. Twenty-five embryos were placed in each 90x15 mm petri dish and replicated four times for each genotype. Cultures were incubated in the dark at 27±1°C. Percentage of immature embryos forming primary callus was recorded two weeks after culture. The developing callus was sub-cultured after every 14 days into the callus maintenance medium (CMM) as for callus initiation but without silver nitrate. Percentage of embryogenic callus formed was recorded four weeks after subculture.
Embryogenic callus was transferred into embryo maturation medium (EMM) containing N6 medium supplemented, 6% (w/v) sucrose, 1 mg L-1 NAA (Naphthalene acetic acid) and 0.3% (w/v) gerlite for embryo maturation. Cultures were incubated in the dark at a temperature of 27±1°C. Embryogenic callus was determined by examining the presence of somatic embryos under the Leica zoom 2000 microscope or hp scanjet 8200. After two weeks of culture on EMM medium, twelve pieces of embryogenic calli with somatic embryos about 100 mg were transferred into the Regeneration Medium (RM) containing MS medium (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) supplemented with 3% (w/v) sucrose and solidified with 0.3% (w/v) gerlite (RM) for shoot induction. There were ten replicates for each genotype. The cultures were incubated at 27±1°C under 16 h/8 h (light/dark). The numbers of shoots formed per culture were recorded after 3 weeks of culture.
Plantlets were transferred onto a solidified half-strength MS medium supplemented with 3% sucrose and 0-1 mg L-1 IBA (Indole-3-butyric acid) for enhancement of root formation. The cultures were incubated at a temperature of 27±1°C under 16 h/8 h (light/dark). The number of roots formed was recorded after two weeks of culture.
Well-rooted plantlets from culture bottles were rinsed with water to remove the media and then transferred into pots containing peat moss. Plantlets were covered with a clear polythene bags which were punctured with several holes to allow gradual acclimatization to ambient humidity for 3-5 days. Plants (Ro) were then transferred into pots containing garden soil mixed with manure and sand (2:2:1) and later some of the plants were transplanted into the research farm and grown to maturity. Seeds of Ro plants were grown to produce R1 plants. The chemicals used in this report were purchased from Duchefa (Haarlem, The Netherlands).
The experiments were organized according to completely randomized design. The experiment was repeated three times. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with SPSS for windows version 11.5 and MINITAB software version 23.22. were used to test the significant effect of the genotypes, 2,4-D concentrations and age of the embryos on callus initiation and plant regeneration. Means were separated using Tukey`s Honest Significant Difference (HSD) at 5% level.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Callus initiation: Immature embryo were plated on N6 medium with their embryo axis in contact with the callus initiation medium (CIM) (Fig. 1a). This orientation helps to retard the germination of embryos and induce proliferation of scutellar cells (Green and Phillips, 1975). Callus initiation from immature embryos was observed after the fourth day of culture on CIM medium from the scutellum (Fig. 1b). This was due to the presence of meristematic cells in the scutellum. Al-Abed et al. (2006) reported the presence of the meristematic cells in the scutellum of maize embryos from which callus is induced. The percentage of the primary callus formed ranged from 0 to 97% and 0 to 83.5% for 16 and 20 DAP immature embryos, respectively (Table 1) while embryogenic callus ranged from 0 to 70% and 0 to 58% for 16 and 20 DAP respectively (Table 2) depending on the concentration of 2,4-D. Embryogenic callus was formed after the first subculture on callus maintenance medium. Globular somatic embryos were formed on the surface of the embryogenic callus (Fig. 1c). Two types of embryogenic callus were formed, type I and II callus. Type 1 callus was compact, white to cream, while type II was friable and light yellow. The amount of type II callus formed was low in the present study. The formation of type I and II callus has been reported in maize (Jiménez and Bangerth, 2001; Tomes and Smith, 1985). Variation of the genotypes to form type I and II callus in maize has been reported to be due to additive gene effects while heterosis positively increases culture response (Tomes and Smith, 1985). Non-embryogenic callus was also formed which was soft, watery and yellow in colour (Fig. 1c) which ceased to grow and turned brown in subsequent subculture. The formation of embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus has been reported in other maize genotypes (Shohael et al., 2003; Jiménez and Bangerth, 2001) and sorghum (Gupta et al., 2006) from immature embryo. Successful establishment of competent cells which can regenerate into a whole plants in many plant species depends on the capability of identifying the appropriate cell types. In our study swelling of the scutellar tissue and germination of immature embryos cultured on a medium devoid of 2,4-D without callus initiation was observed. Studies have shown that 2,4-D is an important factor in the initiation and proliferation of primary and embryogenic callus from immature embryos of maize (Carvalho et al., 1997; Bohorova et al., 1995), mature embryos of maize (Huang and Wei, 2004) and from mature and immature embryos of wheat (Bi et al., 2007; Yu et al., 2003). Concentration of 2,4-D had a significant effect on the percentage of the primary and embryogenic callus initiated from immature embryos 16 and 20 DAP (p<0.05). Embryogenic callus was not formed in CML331 at all concentrations of 2,4-D. The optimum 2,4-D concentration for the initiation of embryogenic callus varied among the maize genotypes 1.5 mg L-1 (CML216 and TL18), 2 mg L-1 (TL27 and CML78) and 2.5 mg L-1 (MU25) from immature embryos 16 DAP (Table 2). The optimum concentration for the initiation of embryogenic callus also varied among genotypes from embryos 20 DAP. High concentration of 2,4-D reduced the percentage of embryogenic callus formed suggesting that 2,4-D had an inhibitory effect. This could be due to the blockage of cell division and inactivation of cells which have the embryogenic potential. Embryogenic callus was not formed in a concentration of 2,4-D which was below 0.3 mg L-1 (TL18), 0.5 mg L-1 (TL27), 0.7 mg L-1 (MU25) and 0.9 mg L-1 (CML78). This shows that the concentration of 2,4-D for the initiation of embryogenic callus was genotype dependent.
Table 1: | Effect of different concentrations of 2,4-D on the percentage of primary callus initiation response from immature embryos 16 and 20 DAP after 14 days of culture in callus initiation medium |
![]() | |
* Mean (percentage of the primary callus induction was evaluated by counting the number of immature embryos that formed callus after 14 days out of the total number of immature embryos cultured in CIM x 100). ** Values followed by different letter(s) within the columns are significantly different from each other according to Tukey`s HSD at 5% level, ***Values followed by the same letter(s) within the row are not significantly different from each other according to Tukey`s HSD at 5% level |
![]() |
Fig. 1: | Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature embryos of maize immature embryos on callus initiation medium after one day of culture. (b) Callus initiation after 14 days of culture. (c) Embryogenic callus (E) with somatic embryo at globular stage on the surface of the proliferating scutellum and non-embryogenic callus (N). (d) Embryo maturation in N6 medium supplemented with 6% sucrose and 1 mg L1 NAA showing heart-shaped somatic embryos. (e) Shoot induction from embryogenic callus on MS medium devoid of growth regulators. (f) In vitro rooting of maize regenerants. (g). In vitro regenerants (Ro) in greenhouse after 4 months in pots (h) Mature R 1 plants |
Table 2: | Effect of different concentrations of 2,4-D on the percentage of embryogenic callus induction response from immature embryos 16 and 20 DAP after 4 weeks of culture in callus maintenance medium |
![]() | |
*Mean (percentage of the embryogenic callus formed was determined by counting number of immature embryos that formed embryogenic callus out of the total number of immature embryos cultured x 100, ** Values followed by different letter(s) within the columns are significantly different from each other according to Tukey`s HSD at 5% level, *** Values followed by different letter(s) within the row are significantly different from each other according to Tukey`s HSD at 5% level |
Age of the embryo (DAP) was a critical factor in determining the capacity of callus initiation from immature embryo. The percentage of primary and embryogenic callus formed from immature embryos 20 DAP was significantly lower than that formed from 16 DAP (p<0.05) (Table 1 and 2). This is probably due to reduction in the meristematic activity of the cells with ageing suggesting that the physiological and developmental state of the embryos is important in determining callus initiation response. Embryos which were less than 1 mm in length did not respond in culture. According to Bohorova et al. (1995), immature embryos of maize less than 0.5 mm in length did not respond in culture while Lu et al. (1983) reported similar results for embryo less than 1 mm.
The genotypes differed significantly (p<0.05) in their response to callus initiation from immature embryos 16 DAP and 20 DAP (Table 1 and 2). This is contrary to Oduor et al. (2006) in which significant differences were not detected on the Kenyan maize genotypes tested using immature embryos 17, 18, 19 and 20 DAP, showing that callus initiation is genotype dependent. CML216 had the highest percentage of embryogenic callus formed which was significantly different from other inbred lines (Table 2). The effect of genotype on the formation of callus has also been reported in other maize genotypes (Ratif et al., 2006; Bohorova et al., 1995). Significant differences were detected in the genotype x 2,4-D concentration interaction and in the genotype x DAP of embryos interaction in the formation of primary and embryogenic callus (p<0.05).
Maturation of somatic embryos and plant regeneration: Somatic embryos were matured when embryogenic callus was transferred to N6 medium with high concentration of sucrose (6%) and 1 mg L-1 NAA (Fig. 1d). Somatic embryos at the heart-shaped stage were observed. High concentration of sucrose has been reported to promote the maturation of somatic embryos in soyabeans (Körbes and Droste, 2005) and maize (Ratif et al., 2006; Che et al., 2006; El-Itriby et al., 2003; Bronsema et al., 1997). This is due to the osmotic stress caused by high concentration of sugar. According to Che et al. (2006), a large number of genes encoding for protein proliferating cell nuclear antigen and histone are down-regulated while those encoding for nucleases, glucosidases and proteases are up-regulated during somatic embryo maturation resulting in the reduction of cell division and growth. When embryogenic callus with somatic embryos were transferred into the Regeneration Medium (RM), they turned green and shoots were observed within two weeks (Fig. 1e). This could be due to the up-regulation of stress-related and transporter encoding genes followed by those encoding for photosynthetic and other chloroplast components (Che et al., 2006). Some of the somatic embryos did not regenerate to form plantlets. This could be due to down-regulation of genes controlling plant regeneration reported by Che et al. (2006) and Hodges et al. (1986) in which it was concluded that regeneration from immature embryo-derived callus was controlled by a few nuclear genes or a few gene clusters. Armstrong et al. (1992) proposed that there is a major gene or genes on the long arm of chromosome 9 of A188 genotype which is responsible for the promotion of embryogenic callus formation and plant regeneration in B73 and Mo17. According to Ikeda et al. (2006), embryogenesis related genes are involved during somatic embryogenesis in some plants which could be the reason for the genotypic differences in the response of the various genotypes observed in this study. Failure of some of the somatic embryos to regenerate plantlets has also been reported in other maize genotypes (Huang and Wei, 2004; Carvalho et al., 1997; Bohorova et al., 1995). In this study non-embryogenic callus did not regenerate plantlets, similar to reports in other maize genotypes (Jiménez and Bangerth, 2001; Bronsema et al., 1997).
The number of shoots formed by CML216 was significantly (p<0.05) higher compared to those formed by other genotypes (Table 3). This shows that regeneration was genotype dependent. The effect of genotype on plant regeneration has also been reported in other maize genotypes (Huang and Wei, 2004; El-Itriby et al., 2003; Bohorova et al., 1995; Tomes and Smith, 1985), wheat and tricale (Dornelles et al., 1997), sorghum (Gupta et al., 2006) and rice (Ge et al., 2006). This is contrary to results by Lu et al. (1983), in which all maize cultivars tested showed more or less similar response in callus initiation and plant regeneration. Differences in the genotypic responses to regenerate observed in this study is likely to be due to the genetic diversity caused by helitron transposable elements which are responsible for capturing and moving genes around the maize genome which contribute to differences in gene expression (Buckler et al., 2006; Guo et al., 2004). In gramineous species such as wheat regeneration from embryonic callus has been reported to be successful on a medium devoid of 2, 4-D (Satyavathi et al., 2004) which is consistency with the present study.
Table 3: | Shoot induction response of six maize genotypes cultured on MS medium devoid of growth regulators |
![]() | |
*Mean. Each value represents a mean of ten replicates each with twelve pieces of calli cultured on MS medium devoid of growth regulators. **Values having different letters within the column are significantly different from each other according to Tukey`s HSD at 5% level |
Table 4: | Effect of IBA concentrations on the number of roots formed in five tropical maize inbred lines |
![]() | |
*Mean number of roots per plant, **Values having the same letter(s) within columns are not significantly different from each other according to Tukey`s HSD at 5% level, ***Values having the same letter(s) within the row are not significantly different from each other according to Tukey`s HSD at 5% level |
Rooting response: Enhancement of root formation was achieved after one week in hormone free half strength MS medium while 4 days in medium supplemented with Indole Butyric acid (IBA) (Fig. 1f). This shows that IBA had a promotive effect on rooting. Increase in IBA concentration up to 0.8 mg L-1 caused an increase in the number of roots formed in all genotypes, while at a concentration of 1 mg L-1 IBA there was a reduction in the number of roots formed (Table 4). This probably may be due to the inhibitory effect of IBA when it is used in high concentration. The best concentration for root formation was 0.8 mg L-1. There was a lot of branching of the roots when shoots were cultured on MS medium supplemented with 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8 mg L-1 IBA. Concentration of IBA had a significant effect (p<0.05) on the number of roots formed in H627, DLC1 and H513. Significant differences (p<0.05) were not detected on the effect of IBA concentration on the number roots formed in H625. CML216 genotype had the highest mean number of roots which was significantly different from those formed by TL27 and MU25 (p<0.05), however there was no significant different detected with those formed by TL18 and CML78 (p>0.05). This results show clearly that root formation was genotype dependent. There was no significant difference (p>0.05) in the interaction between the genotype and IBA concentrations on the number of roots formed.
Acclimatization and growth of in vitro regenerated plants in the greenhouse and in the field: In vitro regenerated plants (Ro) with well-developed roots were transferred into the pots containing peat moss for hardening and later into the soil in the pots in the greenhouse. Ninety four percent of TL18 regenerants (Ro), 98% of CML216, 60% of TL27, CML78 and MU25 of the in vitro regenerants survived in the greenhouse. In vitro regenerated Ro plantlets were grown in the greenhouse (Fig. 1g). Ninety percent of the regenerants (Ro) survived in the field. The seeds from Ro plants were planted, they grew to maturity and set seeds in R1 plants (Fig. h). Hence regeneration system for obtaining fertile plants was established via somatic embryogenesis in the present study. Somatic embryogenesis has been recognized as the most reliable and efficient method for the production of in vitro fertile plantlets.
In conclusion, this study established a reproducible regeneration system of maize genotypes through somatic embryogenesis from immature embryos. Somatic embryogenesis is an important step in any successful plant transformation scheme, because from the callus each transformed cell has the potential to produce a plant. The study established that the genotype, 2,4-D concentration and age of explant had a significant effect on callus initiation and plant regeneration. This suggests that the physiological stage of the embryos is important in determining their response in culture. In our study the highest embryogenic callus and plant regeneration response was produced from inbred line CML216, hence this genotype can be used in genetic transformation studies. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report on successful somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration of Kenyan tropical maize inbred lines from immature embryos.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from German Exchange Service (DAAD) and Rockfellor Foundation. The authors are also indebted to M.Sc., Ph.D students at the Plant Tissue Culture and Plant Transformation Lab, L.O. Alaro and S. Ndungu all at Kenyatta University for their technical assistance and green house attendant D. Odhiambo for taking care of the plants.
REFERENCES
- Dornelles, A.L.C., F.I.F Carvalho, F.C. Federizzi, C.L. Handel, F. Bered, M.E.B. Sordi and F. Schnelden, 1997. Callus initiation and plant regeneration by Brazilian tricale and wheat genotypes. Braz. J. Genet.
CrossRef - El-Itriby, H.A., S.K. Assem, E.H.A. Hussein, F.M. Abdel-Calil and M.A. Madkour, 2003. Regeneration and transformation of Egyptian maize inbred lines via immature embryo culture and a biolistic particle delivery system. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant, 39: 524-531.
CrossRefDirect Link - Al-Abed, D., S. Rudrabhatla, R. Talla and S. Goldman, 2006. Split-seed: A new tool for maize researchers. Planta, 223: 1355-1360.
Direct Link - Ge, X., Z. Chu, Y. Lin and S. Wang, 2006. A tissue culture system for the different germplasms of Indica rice. Plant Cell Rep., 25: 392-402.
Direct Link - Armstrong, C.L., J. Romero-Severson and T.K. Hodges, 1992. Improved tissue culture response of an elite maize inbred through backcross breeding and identification of chromosomal regions important for regeneration by RFLP analysis. Theor. Applied Genet., 84: 755-762.
CrossRefDirect Link - Green, C.E. and R.L. Phillips, 1975. Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize. Crop Sci., 15: 417-420.
CrossRefDirect Link - Bi, R.M., M. Kou, L.G. Chen, S.R. Mao and H.G. Wang, 2007. Plant regeneration through callus initiation from mature embryo of Triticum. Plant Breed., 126: 9-12.
Direct Link - Guo, M., M.A. Rupe, C. Zinselmeier, J. Habben, B.A. Bowen and O.S. Smith, 2004. Allelic variation of gene expression in maize hybrids. Plant Cell., 16: 1707-1716.
Direct Link - Bohorova, N.E., B. Luna, R.M. Brito, L.D. Huerta and D.A. Hoisington, 1995. Regeneration potential of tropical, subtropical, midaltitude and highland maize inbeds. Maydica, 40: 275-281.
Direct Link - Gupta, S., V.K. Khanna, R. Singh and G.K. Garg, 2006. Strategies for overcoming genotypic limitations of in vitro regeneration and determination of genetic components of variability of plant regeneration traits in sorghum. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult., 86: 379-388.
Direct Link - Bosque-Perez, N.A., S.O. Olojede and I.W. Buddenhagen, 1998. Effect of maize streak virus disease on the growth and yield of maize as influenced by varietal resistance levels and plant stage at time of challenge. Euphytica, 101: 307-317.
CrossRefDirect Link - He, G., J. Zhang, K. Li, Z. Xiong, M. Chen, J. Chang, Y. Wang, G. Yang and B. Barnaba´s, 2006. An improved system to establish highly embryogenic haploid cell and protoplast cultures from pollen calluses of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult., 86: 15-25.
Direct Link - Bronsema, F.B.F., W.J.F. van Oostveen and A.A.M. van Lammeren, 1997. Comparative analysis of callus formation and regeneration on cultured immature maize embryos of the inbred lines A188 and A632. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult., 50: 57-65.
CrossRefDirect Link - Hodges, T.K., K.K. Kamo, W.C. Imbrie and M.R. Becwar, 1986. Genotype specificity of somatic embryogenesis and regeneration in maize. Biotechnology, 4: 219-223.
Direct Link - Buckler, E.S., B.S. Gaut and M.D. McMullen, 2006. Molecular and functional diversity of maize. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol., 9: 172-176.
Direct Link - Huang, X.Q. and Z.M. Wei, 2004. High frequency plant regeneration through callus initiation from mature embryos of maize (Zea mays). Plant Cell Rep., 22: 793-800.
CrossRefDirect Link - Carvalho, C.H.S., N. Bohorova, P.N. Bordallo, L.L. Abreu, F.H. Valicente, W. Bressan and E. Paiva, 1997. Type II callus production and plant regeneration in tropical maize genotypes. Plant Cell Rep., 17: 73-76.
CrossRefDirect Link - Ikeda, M., M. Umehara and H. Kamanda, 2006. Embryogenesis-related genes. Its expression and roles during somatic and zygotic embryogenesis in carrot and Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnol., 23: 153-161.
Direct Link - Che, P., T.M. Love, B.R. Frame, K. Wang, A. L. Carriquiry and S. H. Howell, 2006. Gene expression patterns during somatic embryo development and germination in maize Hi II callus cultures. Plant Mol. Biol., 62: 1-14.
CrossRefDirect Link - Chu, C.C., C.C. Wang, C.S. Sun, K.C. Hsu, K.C. Yin, C.Y. Chu and F.Y. Bi, 1975. Establishment of an efficient medium for anther culture of rice through comparative experiments on the nitrogen sources. Scient. Sin., 18: 659-668.
Direct Link - Jiménez, V.M. and F. Bangerth, 2001. Hormonal status of maize initial explants and of the embryogenic and non-embryogenic callus cultures derived from them as related to morphogenesis in vitro. Plant Sci., 160: 247-257.
Direct Link - Conway, G. and G. Toenniessen, 2003. Science for African food security. Science, 299: 1187-1188.
CrossRefDirect Link - Kiiya, W.W., R.M.A. Onyango, T.K. Mwangi and J.M.A. Ngeny, 2002. Participatory verification of maize varieties for lower, highland and upper midland transitional zones of North Rift Kenya. Proceedings of the 2nd Scientific Conference of the Soil Management and Legume Research Network Projects, Kenya, June 26-30, 2002, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, pp: 232-235.
- Dornelles, A.L.C., F.I.F Carvalho, F.C. Federizzi, C.L. Handel, F. Bered, M.E.B. Sordi and F. Schnelden, 1997. Callus initiation and plant regeneration by Brazilian tricale and wheat genotypes. Braz. J. Genet.
CrossRef - Korbes, A.P. and A. Droste, 2005. Carbon sources and polyethylene glycol on soybean somatic embryo conversion. Pesq. Agropec. Bras., 40: 211-216.
Direct Link - El-Itriby, H.A., S.K. Assem, E.H.A. Hussein, F.M. Abdel-Calil and M.A. Madkour, 2003. Regeneration and transformation of Egyptian maize inbred lines via immature embryo culture and a biolistic particle delivery system. In vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant, 39: 524-531.
CrossRefDirect Link - Lu, C., V. Vasil and I.K. Vasil, 1983. Improved efficiency of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in tissue cultures of maize (Zea mays L.). Theor. Applied Genet., 66: 285-289.
CrossRefDirect Link - Ge, X., Z. Chu, Y. Lin and S. Wang, 2006. A tissue culture system for the different germplasms of Indica rice. Plant Cell Rep., 25: 392-402.
Direct Link - Murashige, T. and F. Skoog, 1962. A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol. Plant., 15: 473-497.
CrossRefDirect Link - Green, C.E. and R.L. Phillips, 1975. Plant regeneration from tissue cultures of maize. Crop Sci., 15: 417-420.
CrossRefDirect Link - Guo, M., M.A. Rupe, C. Zinselmeier, J. Habben, B.A. Bowen and O.S. Smith, 2004. Allelic variation of gene expression in maize hybrids. Plant Cell., 16: 1707-1716.
Direct Link - O'Connor-Sanchez, A., J.L. Cabrera-Ponce, M. Valdez-Melara, P. Tellez-Rodriguez, J.L. Pons-Hernandez and L. Herrera-Estrella, 2002. Transgenic maize plants of tropical and subtropical genotypes obtained from calluses containing organogenic and embryogenic-like structures derived from shoot tips. Plant Cell Rep., 21: 302-312.
CrossRefDirect Link - Oduor, R.O., E.N.M. Njagi, S. Ndung'u and J.S. Machuka, 2006. In vitro regeneration of dryland Kenyan maize genotypes through somatic embryogenesis. Int. J. Bot., 2: 146-151.
CrossRefDirect Link - Ratif, M., T. Fatma, T. Husnain, K. Bashir, M.A. Khan and S. Riazuddin, 2006. Regeneration and transformation of elite inbred line of maize (Zea mays L.), with a gene from Bacillus thuringiensis. South African J. Bot., 72: 460-466.
Direct Link - Santos-Serejo, J.A. and M.L.R. Aguiar-Perecin, 2000. Genotypes with high somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration capacity obtained from tissue culture. Sci. Agric., 57: 717-722.
Direct Link - Satyavathi, V.V., P.P. Jauhar, E.M. Elias and M.B. Rao, 2004. Effects of growth regulators on in vitro plant regeneration in durum wheat. Crop Sci., 44: 1839-1846.
Direct Link - Shohael, A.M., M.A.L. Akanda, S. Parvez and S. Mahfuja, 2003. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from immature embryo derived callus of inbred maize (Zea mays L.). Biotechnology, 2: 154-161.
CrossRefDirect Link - Tang, F., Y. Tao, T. Zhao and G. Wang, 2006. In vitro production of haploid and doubled haploid plants from pollinated ovaries of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult., 84: 233-237.
Direct Link - Tomes, D.T. and O.S. Smith, 1985. The effect of parental genotype on initiation of embryogenic callus from elite maize (Zea mays L.) germplasm. Theor. Applied Genet., 70: 505-509.
CrossRefDirect Link - Yu, G., J. Yin, T. Guo and J. Niu, 2003. Selection of the optinum genotype for immature embryo culture of wheat. J. Triticeae Crops, 23: 14-18.
Direct Link - Zhang, S., R. Williams-Carrier and P.G. Lemaux, 2002. Transformation of recalcitrant maize elite inbreds using in vitro shoot meristematic cultures induced from germinated seedlings. Plant Cell Rep., 21: 263-270.
Direct Link