HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Trends in Applied Sciences Research

Year: 2020 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 235-241
DOI: 10.17311/tasr.2020.235.241
Impact of Dynamic Atmospheric Temperature on Dengue Vector-Aedes aegypti
S. Ramya, R. Jayakumararaj and K. Neethirajan

Abstract: Background and Objective: Dengue is common in tropical and sub-tropical climates worldwide, mostly in urban and semi-urban areas. Recently, rural areas are beginning to be affected in developing countries with local variations in risk influenced by rainfall, temperature, relative humidity and unplanned rapid urbanization. In the present study, impact of atmospheric temperature on population of dengue vectors was observed. Materials and Methods: Aedes species were separated among mosquitoes collected from 5 different selected sites located in Madurai (Anaiyur, Iyer Bungalow, Thabal Thanthi Nagar, Tiruppalai and Oomachikulam) with varying human settlement interface for a period of 2 years from January, 2015 to December, 2016. Data were analysed using Principal Components Analysis (PCA). Results: With the raise in temperature, reduction in mosquito population was observed and vice versa. The PCA based interactive model was developed between atmospheric temperature and distribution pattern of the vector population elucidated temperature as positive climatic parameter Conclusion: Density of the mosquitoes is significantly influenced by dynamic atmospheric temperature. Such studies could be used as a model to provide dengue outbreak warning.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
S. Ramya, R. Jayakumararaj and K. Neethirajan, 2020. Impact of Dynamic Atmospheric Temperature on Dengue Vector-Aedes aegypti. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 15: 235-241.

Keywords: mosquito, atmospheric temperature, Aedes aegypti, Dengue vector and vector borne disease

INTRODUCTION

Vector Borne Diseases (VBDs) account for 17% of the global burden of all infectious diseases. Every year there are more than 1 billion cases and over 1 million deaths due to VBDs1,2. Mosquitoes are the most prominent group of insects, both in terms of the number of pathogens transmitted and magnitude of health problems caused1. According to the most recent classification of mosquitoes, the family Culicidae (Diptera) includes two subfamilies, 11 tribes, 111 genera and 3523 species in the world fauna3. However, only 3 genera viz., Aedes, Anopheles and Culex are of concern to the public health as they transmit disease causing pathogens. Genus, Aedes comprises of more than 950 species among them A. aegypti, A. albopictus, A. vittatus, A. polynesiensis and A. scutellaris have been attributed to the outbreak of Dengue and Chikungunya. The virus responsible for causing dengue is called dengue virus (DENV). Dengue virus is transmitted by female mosquitoes mainly of the species Aedes aegypti and to a lesser extent, A. albopictus. Aedes aegypti originated in Africa, but, is now more common in tropical and subtropical regions of the world, generally dwells in urban and suburban areas4.

World’s fastest growing VBD is dengue, with a 30 folds increase in disease incidence over a span of 50 years. Dengue was first recognized in 1950s during dengue epidemics in Philippines and Thailand. Today, it affects most of the Asian and Latin American countries and has become a leading cause of hospitalization besides death among children and adults. In India, the first epidemic of clinical dengue-like illness was recorded in Chennai in 1780 and the first virologically proved epidemic of Dengue Fever (DF) occurred in Calcutta (now Kolkata) and Eastern Coast of India in 1963-1964. The total number of dengue cases in India has significantly increased since 2001. Gupta et al.5 reported that dengue was endemic in a few southern (Maharashtra, Karnataka, Tamil Nadu and Pondicherry) and Northern States (Delhi, Rajasthan, Haryana, Punjab and Chandigarh). Chen and Wilson6 reported that recently, it has spread to other states due to human travel besides population growth, rapid urbanization and failures of preventative public-health measures are the major factors for the increase in dengue cases reported so far.

Climate has direct effects on vectors (e.g., abundance, distribution and longevity), hosts (abundance, distribution and behaviour), pathogens (incubation period, replication and lineage) and their interactions. Abundance of mosquito is the key factor that determines the vectorial capacity and the basic reproductive rate7. Viral and host factors also play an important roles in the course of infection, however, a fundamental knowledge gap still remains to be filled. A growing number of articles suggest that population density of A. aegypti exhibit inter-annual fluctuations that are directly linked to climatic variability. Large-scale longitudinal cohort studies are required to characterize spatial and temporal variations with respect to the distribution and dynamics of the vector. With this background information, the present study was carried out to understand the relationship between the density of dengue vector population and atmospheric temperature.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and period: Madurai is one of the oldest cities and the third largest city in Tamil Nadu, South India. Agriculture and animal husbandry are the major occupation in the surroundings of the study area. Five sites, Anaiyur (urban), Iyer Bungalow (urban), Thabal Thanthi Nagar (urban), Tiruppalai (semi-urban) and Oomachikulam (rural) from Madurai North were selected for the present study. The climate of Madurai is semiarid. In summer, the temperature goes up to a maximum of 42°C and in winter it reaches up to a minimum of 18°C. Human beings and animals become the hosts for anthropophilic and zoophilic mosquitoes, whereas, cultivable and native vegetation provide food for phytophilic mosquitoes. The field study was conducted in selected sites from January, 2015 to December, 2016 in a systematic way. Monsoon showers enhance the breeding habitats of mosquitoes in and around the selected site, in addition to stagnant sewage, water bodies (channel, pond, tank, lake) and the adjoining paddy fields filled with rain and storage water. The survey was done during peak hours (18-10 h) of a day for the collection of adult mosquitoes and meteorological data [Temperature (°C)] was recorded and compared with online sources (www.imdchennai.gov.in) from time to time (Table 1).

Collection of mosquitoes: To study the density and distribution pattern of mosquitoes, periodic collections of adults were carried out at the selected sites. Adult mosquito collections were made according to the method described by Pandian and Chandrashekaran8. To collect maximum number of mosquitoes, both the indoor and outdoor collections were carried out between the peak hours in the morning and evening in selected places including cattle shed, moist places and plantations around. All the collected mosquitoes were preserved for identification.

Identification of mosquito species: Clean vials were used to collect the mosquitoes and they were killed with ether and preserved in vials (4.5×2.5 cm), labelled with area of collection to assess the density of mosquitoes in the site. The field collected preserved mosquitoes were spread on a white sheet of paper and Aedes species were separated. The male and female mosquitoes were distinguished by observation under Carl Zeiss Stemi DV4 Stereo binocular microscope. Aedes species were identified using the keys of Rueda9.

Data on the distribution pattern of mosquitoes revealed that the dimension of spatial distribution in the selected study sites. Based on the density, the mosquitoes were grouped into 5 categories (0-20% sporadic, 20.1-40% infrequent, 40.1-60% moderate, 60.1-80% frequent and 80.1-100% constant). Interestingly, the distribution pattern “C” was 100 indicating the constant nature for all the sites10. Data indicate that, the occurrence of the vector species was uniform. However, the density of the mosquitoes varied significantly in the sites during different months, indicating the impact of climatic factors on their distribution.

Statistical analysis: Meteorological data was correlated with the population of mosquitoes collected from the study sites. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was carried out using PAST (version 2.17c).

RESULTS

Temperature was recorded from all the selected sites. Minimum, maximum and average temperature was determined (Table 1). Average monthly temperature was correlated individually with mosquito population for each of the site (Table 2). Correlation between temperature and density of A. aegypti population for the period of January-December, 2015 (Fig. 1) and January-December, 2016 (Fig. 2) are shown.

Data depicts that a significant correlation exists between temperature and the mosquito population in all the selected sites. During the study period the average monthly temperature ranged from a minimum of 26°C in the month of January, 2015 to a maximum of 32°C in the month of July, 2015, similarly, a minimum of 26°C in the month of January and December, 2016 to a maximum of 34°C in the month of May, 2016.

Invariably, with the raise in temperature there was a corresponding decline in the number of individuals in the population of the vector. Interestingly, a decrease in the vector population 162 (23, 31, 42, 35 and 31, respectively) was observed from S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5 during the month of July, 2015 when a maximum temperature of 39°C was recorded as shown in Table 2.

Table 1:
Meteorological data obtained during the study period (2015-2016)

Table 2:
Distribution pattern of mosquitoes collected from the sites
S1: Anaiyur, S2: Iyyar Banglow, S3: Thabal Thanthi Nagar, S4: Tiruppalai, S5: Oomachikulam

Fig. 1:
Correlation between temperature and density of A. aegypti population during January-December, 2015
  S1: Anaiyur, S2: Iyyar Banglow, S3: Thabal Thanthi Nagar, S4: Tiruppalai, S5: Oomachikulam

Fig. 2:Correlation between temperature and density of A. aegypti population during January-December, 2016
  S1: Anaiyur, S2: Iyyar Banglow, S3: Thabal Thanthi Nagar, S4: Tiruppalai, S5: Oomachikulam

Almost, a similar trend was observed in the successive year also with a total minimum of 170 numbers with a corresponding value of 29, 31, 54, 37 and 19 from S1, S2, S3, S4 and S5, respectively in May, 2016 with maximum temperature of 42°C. However, least population of 152 was observed in the month of July, 2016 where the maximum temperature was 38°C, on the other hand, the winter months with a minimum average temperature of 26°C during the month of January, 2015 and 2016, respectively. The total number of increased population for all the sites were 690 and 680, respectively (Table 2).

To ascertain the significance of temperature as key climatic parameter, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) was performed for each of the sites. Analysis of temperature as PC indicated that temperature as a parameter had a positive correlation (Fig. 3a-e). Furthermore, overall PCA shows temperature as positive climatic parameter that contributes to the reduction in the number of individuals with the raise during the summer (Fig. 3f). In general, there was a similar trend in both year-long cycle of the study period. In specific the trend followed a similar pattern in the year adding to the complication of spread of the disease in the study area. This study implicates temperature as the most significant factor that determines the vector population of an area.

Fig. 3(a-f):
PCA for the effect of temperature on population of A. aegypti, (a) S1, (b) S2, (c) S3, (d) S4, (e) S5 and (f) S1-S5
  S1: Anaiyur, S2: Iyyar Banglow, S3: Thabal Thanthi Nagar, S4: Tiruppalai, S5: Oomachikulam, S1-S5: Overall

DISCUSSION

Temperature of the environment alters mosquito population dynamics by affecting the development of the immature stages (i.e., eggs, larvae and pupae) as well as reproduction11. Temperature has a detrimental effect, both species poikilothermic and small-bodied physiology at aquatic larval stages12-14, with critical isothermal limits inhibiting emergence to the adult stage altogether15. Additional variables explored include daily, monthly and annual minimum, mean and maximum air temperature and diurnal range16,17. Another key parameter that affects population regulation is ground and surface temperatures, which can significantly prolong or shorten life expectancy as vectors at immature stages are often restricted to small cryptic habitats with strong density dependence effects13. This is further complicated by the vector’s unimodal response to temperature, egg overwintering behaviour, anthropogenic microclimates and secondary effects of temperature-driven stage transition18,19.

Data depict that temperature as a climatic variable had a positive correlation with the prevalence of mosquito population for each of the site. Patz et al.20 examined the influences of climatic factors on infectious diseases. It was emphasized that temperature influences developmental rates, mortality and reproductive behaviour of the mosquitoes. Due to the ability to tolerate and withstand a broader temperature range besides other climatic factors, Aedes has been successful in expanding its territory range, globally21. Aedes aegypti is one of the species most favoured by changes in the environment caused by urbanization. Studies have shown that this mosquito species have high degree of flexibility to adapt to anthropogenic induced environmental changes due to the process of urbanization and industrialization to undergo rapid population expansion22.

It is noteworthy that different results have been published for this species across studies, depending on the region of the tested populations and their tolerance to cold. The lower temperature threshold for A. aegypti to develop is 16°C, while 34°C is the upper limit23. At a lower temperature (i.e., 8 ), larvae are motionless and die within a couple of days. Couret et al.13 showed that the development time from hatching to adult emergence was shorter at higher temperatures (30 vs. 21°C and correlated with density and food availability. Bar-Zeev24 reported that the time taken by larvae to complete their development was optimal at 32°C and the highest temperature was 36°C. The mortality was significant at 14 and 38°C. Furthermore, 40°C was attributed to be the thermal upper limit for A. aegypti females, while immature stages were found to survive short exposure to temperature up to 45°C.

CONCLUSION

Expansion of dengue is expected to increase due to climate change, global warming, globalization, travel, trade, socioeconomic aspects, urban planning and human settlement besides the evolution of the vectorial capacity and the virus. No vaccine or specific antiviral therapy yet exists to address the growing threat of dengue. Prompt detection for advance clinical management however can reduce mortality rate. However, the effects of precipitation regimes and seasonality on diseases are still poorly studied. Thorough validation of models is still a challenge and is complicated by a lack of field and laboratory data. Present study results concluded that the dynamic atmospheric temperature can significantly determine the vector population. Higher temperature range during the months of April-June negatively affects the vector population in the region. Ambient low temperatures are positively related to the increase in vector population. Therefore, this field based model system with temperature as a significant climatic parameter could be used as a tool to plan for eco-friendly vector management strategies.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study discovers the naturally occurring underlying relationship between the mosquito population and dynamic atmospheric temperature that can be beneficial for the assessment of dengue outbreak in a region. This study will help the researcher to uncover the critical areas of dengue vector population linked with temperature that many researchers were not able to explore. Thus, a new theory on assessment of the weather-vector population connection is expected to advance efforts to control vector population and disease spread locally and globally may be arrived at.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The author would like to thanks the Trends in Applied Sciences Research for publishing this article FREE of cost and to Karim Foundation for bearing the cost of article production, hosting as well as liaison with abstracting & indexing services, and customer services.

REFERENCES

  • Benedict, M.Q., R.S. Levine, W.A. Hawley and L.P. Lounibos, 2007. Spread of the tiger: Global risk of invasion by the mosquito Aedes albopictus. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis., 7: 76-85.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Patidar, D. and S. Patel, 2019. A study to assess the effectiveness of planned teaching programe on knowledge regarding vector borne diseases among the farmers of selected rural areas of Mehsana district. Int. J. Nurs. Educ. Res., 7: 559-561.
    Direct Link    


  • Saghafipour, A., M.R. Abai, B. Farzinnia, R. Nafar, H. Ladonni and S. Azari-Hamidian, 2012. Mosquito (Diptera: culicidae) fauna of Qom province, Iran. J. Arthropod-Borne Dis., 6: 54-61.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Brown, J.E., B.R. Evans, W. Zheng, V. Obas and L. Barrera-Martinez et al., 2014. Human impacts have shaped historical and recent evolution in Aedes aegypti, the dengue and yellow fever mosquito. Evolution, 68: 514-525.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gupta, N., S. Srivastava, A. Jain and U.C. Chaturvedi, 2012. Dengue in India. Indian J. Med. Res., 136: 373-390.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Chen, L.H. and M.E. Wilson, 2010. Dengue and chikungunya infections in travelers. Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis., 23: 438-444.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lafferty, K.D., 2009. The ecology of climate change and infectious diseases. Ecology, 90: 888-900.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pandian, R.S. and M.K. Chandrashekaran, 1980. Rhythms in the biting behaviour of a mosquito Armigeres subalbatus. Oecologia, 47: 89-95.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rueda, L.M., 2004. Pictorial keys for the identification of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) associated with dengue virus transmission. Zootaxa, Vol. 589.
    CrossRef    


  • Rydzanicz, K. and E. Lonc, 2003. Species composition and seasonal dynamics of mosquito larvae in the Wroclaw, Poland area. J. Vector Ecol., 28: 255-266.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Couret, J. and M.Q. Benedict, 2014. A meta-analysis of the factors influencing development rate variation in Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). BMC Ecol., Vol. 14.
    CrossRef    


  • Xu, H.Y., X. Fu, L.K.H. Lee, S. Ma and K.T. Goh et al., 2014. Statistical modeling reveals the effect of absolute humidity on dengue in Singapore. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., Vol. 8.
    CrossRef    


  • Couret, J., E. Dotson and M.Q. Benedict, 2014. Temperature, larval diet and density effects on development rate and survival of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). PLoS ONE, Vol. 9.
    CrossRef    


  • Stanaway, J.D., D.S. Shepard, E.A. Undurraga, Y.A. Halasa and L.E. Coffeng et al., 2016. The global burden of dengue: An analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet Infect. Dis., 16: 712-723.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Otero, M., H.G. Solari and N. Schweigmann, 2006. A stochastic population dynamics model for Aedes aegypti: Formulation and application to a city with temperate climate. Bull. Math. Biol., 68: 1945-1974.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Liu-Helmersson, J., H. Stenlund, A. Wilder-Smith and J. Rocklov, 2014. Vectorial capacity of Aedes aegypti: Effects of temperature and implications for global dengue epidemic potential. PLoS ONE, Vol. 9.
    CrossRef    


  • Brady, O.J., M.A. Johansson, C.A. Guerra, S. Bhatt and N. Golding et al., 2013. Modelling adult Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus survival at different temperatures in laboratory and field settings. Parasites Vectors, Vol. 6.
    CrossRef    


  • Lima, A., D.D. Lovin, P.V. Hickner and D.W. Severson, 2016. Evidence for an overwintering population of Aedes aegypti in Capitol Hill neighborhood, Washington, DC. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 94: 231-235.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Murdock, C.C., M.V. Evans, T.D. McClanahan, K.L. Miazgowicz and B. Tesla, 2017. Fine-scale variation in microclimate across an urban landscape shapes variation in mosquito population dynamics and the potential of Aedes albopictus to transmit arboviral disease. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis., Vol. 11.
    CrossRef    


  • Patz, J.A., P.R. Epstein, T.A. Burke and J.M. Balbus, 1996. Global climate change and emerging infectious diseases. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 275: 217-223.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kraemer, M.U., M.E. Sinka, K.A. Duda, A.Q. Mylne and F.M. Shearer et al., 2015. The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus. eLIFE, Vol. 4.
    CrossRef    


  • Wilke, A.B.B., R. Wilk-da-Silva and M.T. Marrelli, 2017. Microgeographic population structuring of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae). PLoS ONE, Vol. 12.
    CrossRef    


  • Christophers, S.R., 1960. Aedes aegypti: The Yellow Fever Mosquito. CUP Archive, London, UK


  • Bar-Zeev, M., 1958. The effect of temperature on the growth rate and survival of the immature stages of Aedes aegypti (L.). Bull. Entomol. Res., 49: 157-163.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved