HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Trends in Applied Sciences Research

Year: 2020 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 193-200
DOI: 10.17311/tasr.2020.193.200
Evaluation of Pennisetum perpureum Grass Variety to Improve Feed Availability in South Omo
Denbela Hidosa and Sintayehu Kibiret

Abstract: Background and Objective: The Pennisetum perpureum grass species could play an important role in providing a significant amount of high quality dry matter yield to the livestock. Therefore, this study was initiated to evaluate dry matter yield and chemical composition of 5 Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties in irrigated lowland in South Omo. Materials and Methods: The five Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties were evaluated at Dassanech and Hamer irrigated lowland in randomized complete block design with 3 replications per variety. The data on dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant, leaf to stem ratio and nutritional qualities were analyzed using the general linear model procedures of SAS. Results: The higher (p>0.05) dry matter yield (51.56 t ha1) was recorded for ILRI16840 variety and whereas, the lowest dry matter yield (34.06 t ha1) was for ILRI168902 variety. Moreover, significantly higher (p<0.05) Crude protein (161.70 g kg1, DM) recorded for ILRI16815 and whereas, significantly lowest (p<0.05) crude protein (126 g kg1, DM) for ILRI168902 variety. Conclusion: On basis of results it can be calculated that the pastoral communities who living in irrigated lowland areas of South Omo Zone and other areas having comparable agro-ecology could plant ILRI16840 variety followed by ILRI16815variety for higher dry matter yield and whereas, for crude protein content pastoral communities could plant ILRI16815 variety followed by ILRI16813 variety.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Denbela Hidosa and Sintayehu Kibiret, 2020. Evaluation of Pennisetum perpureum Grass Variety to Improve Feed Availability in South Omo. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 15: 193-200.

Keywords: dry matter yield, chemical composition, Pennisetum perpureum, herbage and grass varieties

INTRODUCTION

Ethiopia has large livestock population in Africa possessing 60.39 millioncattle, 31.30 million sheep, 32.74 million goats, 2.01 million horses, 8.85 million donkeys, 0.46 million mules, camels 1.42 million and 56.06 million poultry population1. However, the overall production and productivity performances of livestock in Ethiopia are generally low due to many determinants2. Among these determinants, the poor feed quality and inadequate feed supply are one of top nutritional impediments2.Under such conditions, the demand for livestock products by consumers in country cannot be sustainably satisfied. Likewise, in study regions the livestock feeding system is completely natural pasture based feeding system3-5. It is obvious that the natural pasture based feeding system is greatly influenced by feed supply and nutritional dynamics of pasture forages6. Moreover, these feed resources could not fulfill the nutritional requirement of animals particularly in the dry season and the supply of these feed resources is inconsistently distributed over the seasons and characterized by high fiber (>55%) and low crude protein contents7,8 (<7%) feed intake level by animal is limited and they barely satisfy even the maintenance requirements. This is triggering to increase high slow growth, mortality, longer calving intervals and substantial weight loss6 and will be made the communities minimum benefits from livestock production system. In this respect, it is not imagined the surplus livestock productivity which refers to the ability of the animals grown to produce economic outputs such as livestock products and by-products of good quality (meat, milk, animal draft power, manure, hides, skins and wool) unless the immediate action undertaken in improving feed quality and quantity issues in to study area3-5. Therefore, testing locally adaptable and nutritionally qualified forages species to supplement pasture based feeding system is only way to overwhelm feed shortage in to study areas9. Amongst the promising forage species promoted in Ethiopia, Pennistum perperum grass species could play an important role in providing a significant amount of high quality forage to the livestock10,11 both under the small holder farmers and intensive livestock production systems with appropriate management practices12,13. The grass can withstand repeated cutting and regrows rapidly, producing a high biomass that is very palatable in the leafy stage14. Moreover, the biomass yield and chemical composition of Pennisetum perpureum grass may vary significantly depending on variety, age, season, location and management practices15,16. Accordingly, the dry matter yields of Pennisetum perpureum ranged from 20-80 t ha1 under high fertilizer input and irrigated condition17 and while, the dry matter yields are on the range of 1.4-18 t ha1 without fertilizers and irrigation10,14. Moreover, the protein content of elephant grass varies from 4.4-20.4%10,18-20 and NDF and ADF ranges from 57-76 and 30-47%, respectively21-23. However, with this promising potential, different Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties have not been evaluated for dry matter yield, plant growth parameters and their chemical composition in irrigated lowland of South Omo Zone. Therefore, objective of this study were 1 to evaluate high dry matter yielding Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties in irrigated lowland for South Omo and to assess the nutrient contents of Pennisetum perpureum grass variety for study regions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Description of study site: The study was conducted from July, 2018-September, 2019 in pastoral areas of the Hamer and Dassanech districts of South Omo Zone. The Dassanech Woreda has lied astronomically 5°14'N latitude, 36°44'E longitude and 1000 km from Addis Ababa and has temperature which ranges from 25-40°C and rainfall from 350-600 mm with bimodal rainfall erratic distribution. The altitude of the study Dassanech district is the ranged from 350-900 m above sea level. While, in Hamer the average temperature of is above 37°C in most parts of district and altitude varies from 450-1765 m above sea level. The average annual rainfall is 400 mm and it is estimated that 66% of the population lead a pastoral production system and 34% of the population practice a crop livestock mixed production system.

Experimental treatments and design: The four Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties such as; ILRI16913, ILRI16815, ILRI16902 and ILRI16817 were collected from Areka Agricultural Research Center and evaluated at both districts. The Pennisetum perpureum grass variety called ILRI16840 which used as local check was formerly introduced and well adapted in study regions was collected from the Jinka Agricultural Research Center. The 5×2 factorial combination was arranged in randomized complete block design with three replicates per variety. The tested varieties were planted in 4×3 m plot area and each variety was assigned randomly to plots within block and cuttings were planted in four rows per plot with 0.75 cm between row and 0.5 cm between plants with 1 m between plots. Then the parent plants were cut into stems with three nodes per cutting and planted at 20 cm deep at an angle of 40° by recommendation of Gemiyo et al.10. The furrow irrigation was used and all the plots were irrigated uniformly and accordingly per the intended irrigation schedule. The two testing location were evaluated in order to identify suitable location for Pennisetum perpureum grass variety production.

Data collection: The growths data like Plant Height (PH), Leaf to Stem Ratio (LTSR) and tillers per plant were measured by harvesting middle of 2 rows by using suckles. The numbers of tillers per plant were counted from the 5 culms after harvesting and plant height was taken from 5 culms randomly from each plot and measured using a steel tape from the ground level to the highest leaf. Biomass yield was determined Pennisetum perpureum varieties were clipped at 5 cm from the ground level from 2 rows next to the guard rows. The weight of the total fresh biomass yield was measured from each plot in the field and the estimated 300 g sample was taken from each plot and brought to Jinka Agricultural Research Center and allotted in to oven dried at 105°C for overnight for dry matter determination. The dry matter yield was calculated by using recommended formula by Mutegi et al.24:

Where:

TFW = Total fresh weight kg/plot
Dwss = Dry weight of subsample in grams
Fwss = Fresh weight of subsample in grams
HA = Harvest plot area in square meters
10 = Constant for conversion of yields in kg m1 to t ha1

In order to measure leaf to stem ration, the morphological parts were separately weighed to know their sample fresh weight, oven dried for 24 h at a temperature of 105°C and separately weighed to estimate the proportions of these morphological parts. Accordingly, leaves were separated from stems and the fractions were estimated based on the dry weight of each component.

Chemical analysis: The laboratory analysis was done at Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center, Debre Birhan, Ethiopia. Forage samples of two locations were oven dried (65°C for 72 h) and ground to pass through 1 mm sieve size screen for chemical analysis. Analysis was made for the different nutritional parameters (DM, Ash, CP, NDF, ADF and Ash). The DM, CP and Ash were analyzed by procedures of AOCA25. The NDF value was also calculated by procedure of Van Soest et al.26 and whereas, the ADF value was analyzed procedures of Van Soest and Robertson27.

Data analysis: The data such as dry matter yield, plant height, leaf to stem ratio, tillers per plant and chemical composition were subjected to Analysis of Variances (ANOVA) using the General Linear Model (GLM) procedure of Statistical Analysis System (SAS) software28. The significant differences among the means were declared at p<0.05 and means were separated using Duncan’s Least Significant Difference (LSD) test with model of:

Yijk = μ+Vi+Lj+Vi×Lj+eijk

Where:

Yijk = All dependent variables
μ = Overall mean
Vi = Effect of variety
Lj = Effect of testing locations
Vi× Lj = Interaction effects of variety and locations
eijk = Random error

RESULTS

Effects of variety on forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and LTSR: The effects of tested Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties under irrigated condition in Dassanech and Hamer districts on dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and LTSR were presented in Table 1. The result from this study revealed that the forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and LTSR were not significantly (p>0.001) affected by tested Pennisetum perpureum varieties. However, the higher dry matter yield and taller plant height were obtained from ILRI16840 variety which was used as local check in this study followed by ILRI16815 variety and while, the lower dry matter yield was observed for ILRI16902 and whereas, the shortest plant height (m) was for ILRI16913 variety. Moreover, higher tillers per plant and LTSR were observed for ILRI16817 variety and lowest were for ILRI16902 variety.

Effect of location on forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and LTSR: The effects of location on forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and leaf to stem ration were presented in Table 2. The results from this study revealed that the forage dry matter yield and plant height were not significantly (p>0.05) affected by tested locations. But, the higher forage dry matter and taller plant height were obtained from Dassanech location than Hamer location. Conversely, significantly more (p<0.05) tillers per plant and leaf to stem ration were also obtained from Dassanech location and whereas, lower tillers per plant and LTSR were from Hamer location.

Table 1:
Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties on forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and leaf to stem ratio
SEM: Standard error of mean, LSD: Least Significance difference

Table 2:
Effects of locations on forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and LTSR
Means with the same letter (a and b) in across row for dry matter, plant height, tillers per plant and LTSR at 50% flowering stage are not significantly different (p>0.05), SEM: Standard error of mean, LSD: Least significance difference

Table 3:
Variety interaction effect on forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and LTSR
Means with the same letter (a, b, c and d) in across column for forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and LTSR at 50% flowering stage are not significantly different (p>0.05), SEM: Standard error of mean, LSD: Least significance difference, t ha1: Tone per hectare, m: Meter

Location by variety interaction effect on forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and LTSR: The location by varieties interaction effect on forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and leaf to stem ratio were presented in Table 3. The results for location and variety interaction effect revealed that significantly higher (p<0.05) forage dry matter yield, plant height, tillers per plant and leaf to stem ratio were observed between the location by keeping tested variety constant and however, it was insignificant (p>0.05) among the tested varieties by keeping location constant. Accordingly, better forage dry matter yield and taller plant height were observed for ILRI16815 Pennisetum perpureum grass variety followed by ILRI16840, ILRI16913, ILRI16817 and ILRI16902 Pennisetum perpureum varieties at Dassanech location and whereas, better forage dry matter yield was observed for ILRI16840 variety followed by ILRI16817, ILRI16815, ILRI16902 and ILRI16913 Pennisetum perpureum at Hamer location. Moreover, the results from this study shown that the taller plant height were observed at Hamer location for ILRI16815 followed by ILRI168902, ILRI16840, ILRI16817 and ILRI16913 Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties, respectively. Furthermore, the result on LTSR for location by variety interaction effect revealed that the ILRI16817 grass variety gave better LTSR at Dassanech location followed by ILRI16913, ILRI16815, ILRI16840 and ILRI168902 Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties and whereas, in case of Hamer location, the ILRI16840 and ILRI16817 varieties were gave better LTSR followed by ILRI16813, ILRI16815 and ILRI16902 varieties means with the same letter (a, b and c) in across column for dry matter percent, crude protein, ash, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber at 50% flowering stage are not significantly different (p>0.001)

Table 4:Chemical compositions of tested Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties
DM: Dry matter, SEM: Standard error of mean, LSD: Least significance difference

Chemical composition of grass varieties: The chemical compositions of tested Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties for Dassanech location were presented in Table 4. The results from this study revealed that significantly higher (p<0.05) crude protein (16.17%) recorded for ILRI 16815 variety than ILRI16840 and but, it was not significantly varied (p>0.05) to ILRI16813 and ILRI16817 varieties. The result obtained from this study also demonstrated that ILRI168902 variety gave significantly (p<0.05) higher neutral detergent fiber than ILRI16840 variety but, it was significantly (p>0.05) similar to ILRI16815, ILRI16813 and ILRI168917 varieties. Pertaining to acid detergent fiber, ILRI16840 variety gave higher acid detergent fiber than ILRI168902, ILRI16815 and ILRI16817 varieties and but, it was similar (p>0.05) to ILRI16813 variety.

DISCUSSION

The higher dry matter yield and taller plant height from this study for Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties is due to high genetic potential of variety to adapt a given agro ecology. The previous studies reported by Xie et al.16, Skerman and Riveros17 were demonstrated that the wider range of dry matter yield difference between Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties could be attributed due to differences in genetic potential of varieties. The dry matter yield obtained from this study for all tested Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties was higher than previously reported values by Gemiyo et al.10 which ranged from 12-18 t ha1 for 10 elephant grass varieties under rain fed condition, Mamaru14 reported 1.4-7 t ha1 for ten elephant grass varieties rain fed condition. However, it was comparable to previously reported values by Skerman and Riveros17 and Turano et al.29 which ranged from 20-80 t ha1 under high fertilizer input and irrigated condition. Furthermore, finding from this study for plant height was slightly comparable to previously reported values which ranged from 1.86-2.78 m by Mamaru14 and higher than reported values which ranged from 0.58-0.82 m by De Carvalho et al.30. Moreover, Mamaru14 reported that the tillering performance is an important morphological characteristic to be considered during selection of appropriate forage crops to improve production and productivity. The difference in tillers produced per plant among the varieties of Pennisetum perpureum grass from this study could be attributed to genetic variations among the varieties. The variation in tiller number among different varieties of Pennisetum perpureum grass was previously reported in central Kenya by Mwendia et al.31. The result on tillers per plant for Pennisetum perpureum grass varieties from this study were higher than reported values by Mamaru14 which ranged from 9-12 tillers per plant from Ethiopia. Zewdu11 from Ethiopia had reported that the leaf and stem fractions were affected by tillering performance, plant height and age of harvesting. The leaf fraction has significant implications on the nutritive quality of the grass as leaves contain higher levels of nutrients and less fiber than stems. The result indicated that the leaf fraction is an important factor affecting diet selection, quality and intake of forage Bayble et al.23. The leaf fraction is associated with high nutritive value of the forage because leaf is generally of higher nutritive value described by Feyissa et al.32 and the performance of animals is closely related to the amount of leaf in the diet. Furthermore, the higher forage dry matter, plant height, tillers per plant and leaf fraction were observed at Dassanech location than Hamer location from this study is might be due to suitable temperature and favorable soil parameters in Dassanech location which make faster plant growth and triggering more leaves per plats which are responsible for more dry matter yield and other agronomic parameters. In supports to the result from this study, the previous studies reported had confirmed that forage dry matter yield of forage species greatly influenced by weather conditions such as rainfall, temperature and precipitations33-35. The difference for tested parameters over location by variety interaction effect for tested varieties is might be due to variability in climatic and soil condition which indicated that the genetic make-up of tested grass varieties were influenced by environmental factors which shows to us different varieties have differential response to different planting locations. The previous studies reported by Gamachu and Wekgari36 and Anindo and Potter37 were demonstrated that variety by environment interaction is the result of changes in cultivar's relative performance across environments due to differential responses of the genotypes to various edaphic, climatic and biotic factors and this is help to identifying suitable genotype for specific location. The similarity in crude protein content among the tested grass variety in to study area is due to similarity in make-up to accumulate similar nitrogen contents in a given environments reported by Zewdu et al.38. The higher protein content for ILRI16815, ILRI16813 and ILRI16817 from this study is due to higher leaf fraction. The previous studies reported by Kebede et al.39 and Bediye et al.40 were demonstrated that a high rate of decline in the proportion of leaves in relation to stems which resulted reduction in crude protein content of elephant grass varieties. The other studies reported by Singh et al.41 and Mahala et al.42 also indicated that the crude protein content of herbaceous species is higher at a young stage of growth than at maturity stage. The previously reported studies by Leng43 and Smith44 indicated that crude protein content of about 60-70 g kg1, DM is required for maintenance of ruminant livestock and whereas, the CP content of 80-130 g kg1, DM is required for moderate milk production (10-15 kg/cow/day) for dairy cows reported by ARC45 and Humphhreys46. Therefore, the CP content obtained from our study for all tested grass varieties is above the maintenance requirement for ruminant livestock and enough to satisfy protein requirement for dairy Cow to produce 10-15kg milk/ cow/day. The neutral detergent fiber approximates the total cell wall constituents and is used to predict intake potential in livestock and whereas, acid detergent fiber primarily represents cellulose and lignin and is often used to calculate digestibility of feeds according to Van Soest47. The values obtained from this study for neutral detergent fiber was comparable to the previous study reported values which ranged from 57-76% reported by Cassoli et al.22 and Babyle et al.23and while, acid detergent fiber was higher than previously reported values which ranged from 46.77-49.28% by Kebede et al.39 for 10 Nipper grass accessions. Generally, the Singh and Oosting48 and Kellems and Church49 reported that feeds containing NDF values of less than 45% could be classified as high quality, those with values ranging from 45-65% as medium and those with values higher than 65% as low quality. Based on this classification most of tested elephant grass except ILRI16840 variety can be classified as low quality forages class and this is indicated that ruminant feeding system should be supplemented with legume forages.

CONCLUSION

The higher dry matter yield was recorded for the ILRI16840 variety and whereas, the lower dry matter yield was for ILRI16902 variety. Moreover, ILRI 16815 variety gave higher crude protein and ILRI 16902 and ILRI16840 varieties gave the lower crude protein. Based on result from this study, it was concluded that pastoralists and agro pastoralists who live in irrigated lowland areas of South Omo could plant both ILRI16840 and ILRI16815 varieties for higher dry matter yield and whereas, pastoralists and agro pastoralists could plant ILRI16815 variety followed by ILRI16913 and ILRI16817 varieties for CP production.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study identified the adaptability potential of the Pennisetumperpureum grass varieties to improve the dry matter yield availability for livestock to dry land area of South Omo. The findings from this study will be beneficial for livestock producers to improve nutritional shortfall and hence, improve livelihood of livestock producers. This study will also help the researchers to uncover the critical areas of livestock feeds that many researchers were not able to explore before.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was made possible with funding from Regional Pastoral Livelihood Resilience Project (RPLRP) grant number 10000245144688 to Jinka Agricultural Research Centre for the enhancing the pastoral livelihoods in South Omo Zone. We are extremely thankful the Regional Pastoral Livelihood Resilience Project (RPLRP) Office in SNNPR, Hawassa, for providing fully fund support for research activity. We are grateful to and acknowledge Hamer and Dassanech Woreda Livestock and Fisheries Office developmental agents and pastoralists for participation in this study. Finally, we are grateful to acknowledge the laboratory technician Mr Ashenafikebede Hailemariam from Debre Birhan Agricultural Research Center for his wonderful cooperation for laboratory forage sample analysis. The author would like to thanks the Trends in Applied Sciences Research for publishing this article free of cost and to Karim Foundation for bearing the cost of article production, hosting as well as liaison with abstracting & indexing services, and customer services.

REFERENCES

  • CSA., 2018. Agricultural sample survey, Volume II: Report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings). Statistical Bulletin 587, Central Statistical Agency, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp: 100.


  • FAO, 2018. Ethiopia: Report on Feed Inventory and Feed Balance, 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, ISBN: 978-92-5-131004-5, Pages: 160
    Direct Link    


  • Hidosa, D., Y. Tesfaye and A. Feleke, 2017. Assessment on feed resource, feed production constraints and opportunities in Salamago Woreda in South Omo zone, in South Western Ethiopia. Acad. J. Nutr., 6: 34-42.


  • Berhanu, T., G. Abebe, J. Thingtham, S. Tusdri and S. Prasanpanich, 2017. Availability of feed resources for goats in pastoral and agro-pastoral districts of South Omo zone, Ethiopia. Int. J. Res.-Granthaalayah, 5: 154-160.
    Direct Link    


  • Admasu, T., E. Abule and Z.K. Tessema, 2010. Livestock-rangeland management practices and community perceptions towards rangeland degradation in South Omo zone of Southern Ethiopia. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 22, No. 1.


  • Hidosa, D. and Y. Tesfaye, 2018. Assessment study on livestock feed resource, feed availability and production constraints in Maale Woreda in South Omo zone. J Fish. Livest. Prod., Vol. 6, No. 2.
    CrossRef    


  • Ansah, T., E.L.K. Osafo and H.H. Hansen, 2010. Herbage yield and chemical composition of four varieties of Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass harvested at three different days after planting. Agric. Biol. J. North Am., 1: 923-930.
    Direct Link    


  • Tessema, Z.K. and M. Alemayehu, 2010. Management of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) for high yield and nutritional quality in Ethiopia: A review. Ethiop. J. Anim. Prod., 10: 73-94.
    Direct Link    


  • Shapiro, B.I., G. Gebru, S. Desta, A. Negassa, K. Nigussie, G. Aboset and H. Mechal, 2015. Ethiopia livestock master plan. ILRI Project Report. International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI), Nairobi, Kenya. ISBN 92–9146–425–2, Accessible online from: https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/68037/lmp_roadmaps.pdf?sequence=1


  • Gemiyo, D., A. Jimma and S. Wolde, 2017. Biomass yield and nutritive value of ten Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) accessions at Areka, Southern Ethiopia. World J. Agric. Sci., 13: 185-190.
    Direct Link    


  • Zewdu, T., 2005. Variation in growth, yield, chemical composition and in vitro dry matter digestibility of Napier grass accessions (Pennisetum purpureum). Trop. Sci., 45: 67-73.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bediye, S., Z. Sileshi, T. Tekletsadik and L. Ayalew, 1998. Evaluation of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) and Pennisetum Hybrids (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum typhoides) in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 5th National Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production, May 15-17, 1997, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia -.


  • Mengistu, A. and G. Assefa, 2012. The Evolution of Forage Seed Production in Ethiopia. In: Forage Seed Research and Development in Ethiopia, Assefa, G., M. Dejene, J. Hanson, G. Anemut, S. Mengistu and A. Mengistu (Eds.)., Ethiopia Institute of Agricultural Research, Addis Ababa, pp: 15-32


  • Mamaru, T., 2018. Evaluation of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) accessions for agronomic traits under acidic soil conditions of Nejo Area, Ethiopia. Int. J. Agric. Biosci., 7: 30-35.
    Direct Link    


  • Ogoshi, R., B. Turano, G. Uehara, J. Yanagida, P. Illukpitiya, J. Brewbaker and J. Carpenter, 2010. Evaluation of Cellulosic Feedstocks for Biofuel Production. In: Biofuel and Bioenergy from Biowastes and Biomass, Khanal, S.K., R.Y. Surampalli, T.C. Zhang, B.P. Lamsal, R.D. Tyagi and C.M. (Eds.)., American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, USA., pp: 130-157


  • Xie, X.M., X.Q. Zhang, Z.X. Dong and H.R. Guo, 2011. Dynamic changes of lignin contents of MT-1 elephant grass and its closely related cultivars. Biomass Bioenergy, 35: 1732-1738.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Skerman, P.J. and F. Riveros, 1990. Tropical Grasses. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp: 83


  • Rusdy, M., 2016. Elephant grass as forage for ruminant animals. Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 28, No. 4.


  • Antony, S. and C.G. Thomas, 2014. Nutritive quality of hybrid napier cultivars grown under rainfed ecosystem. J. Trop. Agric., 52: 90-93.
    Direct Link    


  • Halim, R.A., S. Shampazuraini and A.B. Idris, 2013. Yield and nutritive quality of nine Napier grass varieties in Malaysia. Malays. J. Anim. Sci., 16: 37-44.
    Direct Link    


  • Geleti, D., 2012. Agronomic and nutritional evaluation of selected forage legumes and locally available feedstuff and characterization of forage and dairy innovation systems in Bako and NekemtePeri-Urban Areas, Oromia, Ethiopia. Ph.D. Thesis, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia.


  • Cassoli, L.D., L.C. Roma Júnior, A.C.D.O. Rodrigues and P.F. Machado, 2008. In situ degradability of corn stover and elephant-grass harvested at four stages of maturity. Scient. Agric., 65: 595-603.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bayble, T., S. Melaku and N.K. Prasad, 2007. Effects of cutting dates on nutritive value of Napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass planted sole and in association with Desmodium (Desmodium intortum) or Lablab (Lablab purpureus). Livest. Res. Rural Dev., Vol. 19, No. 1.


  • Mutegi, J.K., D.N. Mugendi, L.V. Verchot and J.B. Kung’u, 2008. Combining napier grass with leguminous shrubs in contour hedgerows controls soil erosion without competing with crops. Agrofor. Syst., 74: 37-49.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • AOAC., 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edn., Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DC., USA., Pages: 684
    Direct Link    


  • van Soest, P.J., J.B. Robertson and B.A. Lewis, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Van Soest, P.J. and J.B. Robertson, 1985. Analysis of Forages and Fibrous Foods. Cornell University Press, New York, USA


  • SAS., 2002. SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers. Version 9.0, SAS Institute Inc., Carry, NC., USA


  • Turano, B., U.P. Tiwari and R. Jha, 2016. Growth and nutritional evaluation of Napier grass hybrids as forage for ruminants. Trop. Grasslands, 4: 168-178.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • De Carvalho, C.A.B., J.D.O. de Menezes and A.C. Cóser, 2000. Effect of fertilizer and cutting frequency on yield and nutritive value of elephant grass. Cienc. Agrotecnol., 24: 233-241.


  • Mwendia, S.W., D.W. Mwangi, R.G. Wahome and M. Wanyoike, 2008. Assessment of growth rate and yields of three Napier grass varieties in Central Highlands of Kenya. East Afr. Agric. For. J., 74: 211-217.
    Direct Link    


  • Feyissa, F., G. Assefa, L. Hiwot, M. Minta and T. Tsadik, 2005. Evaluation of Napier grass-vetch mixture to improve total herbage yield in the central highlands. Proceedings of the 13th Annual Conference of the Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP), August 25-26, 2005, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp: 155-163.


  • Molla, E.A., B.A. Wondimagegn and Y.M. Chekol, 2018. Evaluation of biomass yield and nutritional quality of oats-vetch mixtures at different harvesting stage under residual moisture in Fogera District, Ethiopia. Agric. Food Secur., Vol. 7, No. 1.
    CrossRef    


  • Semman, U., B. Eba and T. Dinkale, 2018. Performance evaluation of improved oat varieties/accessions at the highland of Guji Zone, Bore, Ethiopia. Perform. Eval., 8: 21-26.
    Direct Link    


  • Bruzon, V., 2007. Feed and fodder consultant. EC/GOP project ALA/01/129. Strenthening of Livestock Services Project.


  • Gamachu, N. and G. Wekgari, 2017. Adaptation study of improved elephant grasses (Pennisetum purpureum) and Oats (Avena sativa L.) at Haro Sabu, Kelem Wollega zone, Ethiopia. J. Biol. Agric. Healthcare, 7: 51-60.
    Direct Link    


  • Anindo, D.O. and H.L. Potter, 1994. Seasonal variation in productivity and nutritive value of Napier grass at Muguga, Kenya. East Afr. Agric. For. J., 59: 177-185.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zewdu, T., R.M.T. Baars and A. Yami, 2002. Effect of plant height at cutting, source and level of fertiliser on yield and nutritional quality of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach.) Afr. J. Range Forage Sci., 19: 123-128.
    Direct Link    


  • Kebede, G., F. Feyissa, G. Assefa, M. Alemayehu and A. Mengistu et al., 2016. Chemical composition and in vitro organic matter digestibility of Napier Grass (Pennisetum purpureum (L.) Schumach) accessions in the mid and highland areas of Ethiopia. Int. J. Livest. Res., 6: 41-59.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bediye, S., Z. Sileshi, T. Tekletsadik and L. Ayalew, 1998. Evaluation of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) and pennisetum hybrids (Pennisetum purpureum × Pennisetum typhoides) in the central highlands of Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 15th National Conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production, May 15-17, 1997, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, pp: 194-202.


  • Singh, K.K., B. Srinivas and K.S. Ramchandra, 1997. Chemical changes with maturity and its impact on in sacco dry matter degradation of some range grasses and legumes. Indian J. Anim. Nutr., 14: 254-257.
    Direct Link    


  • Mahala, A.G., I.V. Nsahlai, N.A.D. Basha and L.A. Mohammed, 2009. Nutritive evaluation of natural pasture at early and late rainfall season in Kordofan and Butana, Sudan. Aust. J. Basic Applied Sci., 3: 4327-4332.
    Direct Link    


  • Leng, R.A., 1990. Factors affecting the utilization of ‘poor-quality’ forages by ruminants particularly under tropical conditions. Nutr. Res. Rev., 3: 277-303.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Smith, O.B., 1993. Feed resources for intensive smallholder systems in the tropics: The role of crop residues. Proceedings of the at the 17th International Grassland Congress, February 8-21, 1993, Newzealand and Australia, pp: 1969-1976.


  • ARC., 1984. The Nutrient Requirement of Ruminant Livestock. Supplement No. 1. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Faraham Royal, UK


  • Humphreys, L.R., 1991. Tropical Pasture Utilization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK


  • van Soest, P.J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. 2nd Edn., Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, Pages: 476
    Direct Link    


  • Singh, G.P. and S.J. Oosting, 1992. A model for describing the energy value of straws. Indian Dairyman, 44: 32-327.
    Direct Link    


  • Kellems, R.O. and D.C. Church, 1998. Livestock Feeds and Feeding. 4th Edn., Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, USA., Pages: 537

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved