HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Trends in Applied Sciences Research

Year: 2019 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 142-159
DOI: 10.17311/tasr.2019.142.159
Essential Oils Development Through Nanoparticles for Managing Stored Product Insect Pests
Nadia Zikry Dimetry, Nabil El- Wakeil and Hany Hussein

Abstract: Essential oils are biodegradable nature, systemicity after application, ability to modify the conduct of target pests and good security profile. This review was aimed to focus on the plant nanopesticides for the improvement to control stored product pests. The Essential oils (Eos) are portrayed by fast corruption, selectivity, low mammalian harmfulness and negligible effects on the environment. Recent investigations indicated that some chemical constituents of these oils interfere with the octopaminergic nervous system in insects. The worldwide post-harvest grain losses were caused by insect pests (Coleoptera and Lepidoptera), which infest sustenance grains and seeds in the fields and in addition in the stores. Control of these insect pests depends primarily on the utilization of chemical insecticides; botanical insecticides can be prescribed as ecochemical choices. Essential oils can be grouped according to their mode of actions or the way oil destroys or controls the target pest as well the action sites. As this target site is not shared with mammals, most essential oil chemicals are relatively non-toxic to bees, fish and mammals. Nanotechnology is rising as a highly gorgeous tool for formulation and delivery of insecticide active components as well as enhancing and offering new active ingredients for controlling many of stored product insect pests over the world. This strategy will be very useful either in the field or in the storages, if it possesses high amorphous silica content with uniform size distribution. Nanoparticles offer a greater surface part and circulate easily in insects; therefore, they are considered special harness substances, as well as they can be removed during 24 h from the insect body. Insecticides based on essential oils have verified efficacy against stored product insects. Direct sprays, fumigants and granular formulations are the known methods for applying nanomaterials. These features showed that the plant essential oils could be used in a variety of ways to control stored product insects.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Nadia Zikry Dimetry, Nabil El- Wakeil and Hany Hussein, 2019. Essential Oils Development Through Nanoparticles for Managing Stored Product Insect Pests. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 14: 142-159.

Keywords: Fumigation, nanopesticides, essential oils, botanical insecticides, repellent and antifeedant, nanoformulations and stored product insects

INTRODUCTION

The worldwide post-harvest grain losses caused by insect pests harm and different bioagents1-3 run from 10-40%. Two main groups of insect pests, for example, Coleoptera (beetles and weevils) and Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies) include the most economically important post-harvest insects. They infest sustenance grains and seeds in the fields and in addition in the stores. The major stored pests are Sitophilus oryzae, Rhizopertha dominica, Tribolium castaneum, Sitotraga cerealella and Bruchus chinensis. Callosobruchus chinensis (L.) is a serious pest of chickpea, mungbean, peas, cowpea, lentil and ashar. They cause physical harm, grain spilling or weakening, loss of weight and quality, force misfortune, germination diminishment, lose an incentive for showcasing and utilization or planting3.

Most of them have the habit of destroying more than what they eat4. It has been estimated that about 2.5 million t of pesticides are used on crops each year and the worldwide damage caused by the greater part of them have the propensity for decimating more than what they eat4. It has been evaluated that 2.5 million t of pesticides are utilized each year and the overall damage caused by pesticides comes to $100 billion yearly. The reasons for this are the high toxicity and non-biodegradable properties of pesticides. Also, the residues affect public health5. Control of these insect pests depends primarily on the utilization of chemical insecticides, for example, pyrethroids, organophosphorus compounds and fumigants, for example, phosphine and methyl bromide6,7. The EOs seems, by all accounts, to be promising aromatic plants and their vegetable oils are among the most broadening of the methodologies inalienable in IPM is vital for better environmental protection. Plant essential oils have generally been utilized to kill or repulse insects8, being considered as other option to stored grain conventional pesticides in view of their low toxicity to warm blooded well evolved creatures and their high volatility9,10.

In excess of 1,660 insect species have been accounted for to be related with stored-food11. The development and advancement of all stored product pests is needy upon temperature, relative humidity and the accessibility of sustenance assets. The advancement times will fluctuate with temperature; abstain from food and other natural and ecological variables. This association with conduct impacts the capacity to recognize nearness of insects, utilizing traps12.

They have great ecotoxicological properties (low lethality to people, promote corruption and lower natural effect) making them reasonable to overseeing insects in natural cultivating13. These essential oils are optional metabolites and incorporate alkaloids, amides, flavones, lignans, neolignans or phenols which are essential in insect plant relationship14. They are found in glandular hairs or secretory depressions of plant-cell divider and are available as beads of liquid in the leaves, stems, bark, blooms, roots as well as natural products in various plants. The fragrant attributes of essential oils give different capacities to the plants including (i) Attracting in or repulsing insects, (ii) Shielding themselves from warmth or cool and (iii) Using compound constituents in the oil as resistance materials. Huge numbers of the essential oils have different uses as nourishment added substances, flavorings and segments of beauty care products, cleansers, aromas, plastics and as tars13,14.

Plants are the most effective makers of phytochemicals in nature including optional metabolites that are utilized by the plant as protection framework against stored product insect pests15. The goal of this work was to focus on the plant nanopesticides for the improvement of novel definitions to control stored product pests. To shed light on the EOs importance for stored product insect control, their mode of action and their impact on insect management development, because of their biodegradable nature, systemicity after application, capacity to alter the behavior of target pests and favourable safety profile, it is hoped that nanoformulations of essential oil pesticides play a significant role in achieving evergreen revolution.

IMPORTANCE OF ESSENTIAL OILS

Aromatic plant species included about 17500 among higher plants and almost 3000 essential oils are identified, of these oils 300 have been used for cosmetic and perfume industries16,17. Essential oils and their derivatives are considered to be safe alternative means of controlling many harmful insects. Their rapid degradation in the environment reduced the polluting substance and decreases the risk of developing resistance and they are also safe to parasitoids and predators18. Plant essential oils are characterized as any unpredictable oils that have solid sweet-smelling parts and that give particular smell, flavor or fragrance to a plant and have a generally lower density than that of water17. There are numerous resources of essential oils (e.g., garlic oil or capsicum oleoresin) (Table 1).

The fragrant qualities of basic oils give different capacities to the plants including (i) Larvicidal and antifeedant activity19, (ii) Capacity to delay development, adult emergence and fertility20, (iii) Oviposition deterrence21, (iv) Repellence effects22, (v) Protecting themselves from warmth or cool and (vi) Using compound constituents in the oil as protection materials.

Table 1:
Egyptian medicinal and aromatic plants, which can be used as botanical insecticides
Source: El-Wakeil102

Most EOs involved monoterpenes intensifies that contain 10 carbon molecules frequently masterminded in a ring or in non-cyclic shape and also sesquiterpenes which are hydrocarbons including 15 carbon particles23. A monoterpenoid, linalool was established to performance on nervous system which affects ion transport and helps to release the acetylcholine esterase into insects24. The most dominating gatherings are cyclic mixes with saturated or unsaturated hexacyclic or an aromatic framework25. Several essential oils have bactericidal, fungicidal and insecticidal properties17.

EFFICACY OF BOTANICAL ESSENTIAL OILS

Stored food products are inclined to post harvest misfortune in quality and amount because of invasion by various gatherings of insects. Control of these insects depended on the utilization of manufactured pesticide sprays, for example, pyrethroids, organophosohorous pesticides and fumigants, phosphine and methyl bromide6,7,26-28. These chemicals are basic and financially savvy yet their monstrous utilize caused several problems predominantly resistant strains of insects and natural contamination with negative reactions on human safety and disturbing biological control framework7,29,30.

So, as to get free the impacts of customary engineered pesticides, biopesticides in view of essential oils (EOS) seem, by all accounts, to be a corresponding or elective safe technique in crop production and integrated pest management23,31,32. The EOS indicated harmful, anti-agents and anti-feedant impacts on stored product insect pests8,33-37. In spite of these promising properties, issues related with the EO unpredictability, poor water dissolvability and inclination for oxidation must be settled before they are utilized as an elective pest control framework. Antifeedant effect of 1,8-cineole has additionally been exhibited against T. castaneum25. In another investigation38, a terpenoid lactone showed antifeeding action against Sitophilus granarium; Trogoderma granarium and T. confusum. Nourishing prevention exercises of leaf fundamental oil of Curcuma longa against Rhyzopertha domestica, S. oryzae and T. castaneum were accredited to the nearness of monoterpenes and dihydrocarvone39. Essential oils extracted/got from Curcuma longa and Zingiber officinale have additionally been discovered compelling as efficient anti-feedant and insect growth regulators40,41. Essential oils of majoram and rosemary oil were evaluted against onion thrips; these oils had an anti-feedant effects42,43. The oviposition deterrent index was 100% when mung bean seeds were treated with Acorus calamus oil37. These oils are rich in, linalool, eugenol, carvacrol and thymol that have impacts against insects and fumigant movement in above cases could be ascribed to them25.

Fumigant toxicity of essential oils: Fumigants are pesticides acting in the vapor or vaporous stage on the objective pests44. The most widely recognized strategy used to control stored product pests is fumigation since it is compelling against most species, enables the insecticide spray to effectively achieve the insect pest inside the grain and leaves little buildups45-48. In fumigant danger test, the best effect was found with the EO from eucalyptus with a KT50 estimation49 of 8.34 min.

The substances are transported to various tissues through the system of tracheas and tracheoles, hence achieving their site of activity50,51. The poisonous impact of a substance relies upon various toxic kinetic steps, yet in addition on its physicochemical properties. The EO segmented with high vapor pressure can volatilize effortlessly and are by and large more dangerous than those with low vapor pressures52. The fumigant lethality of 28 vegetable oils separated from different flavor and herb plants and some of their real constituents were surveyed for many coleopteran adults. The EOs of oregano and exquisite were exceptionally powerful and caused 100% mortality of Plodia interpunctella and Ephestia kuehniella53-55.

The fumigant poisonous quality of essential oils was evaluated against stored product insects. The T. castaneum was observed to be the most resistant, contrasted and S. oryzae, R. dominica and O. surinamensis, to most essential oils tried2,9. Their findings reported that fumigant quality and repellence of this oil was vitally impacted by concentration as well as time after treatment. The oil caused 98, 99 and 100% mortality of tested insects. Fumigant toxic effect investigated by various essential oils and their monoterpenoids were likewise assessed against the bean weevil Acunthoscelides obtectus and S. cerealella56. The S. oryzae, C. chinensis and Corcyra cephalonica are the most dangerous insect pests of grains57-60. Producers are moving far from utilizing methyl bromide as post-harvest fumigant due to its ozone-draining nature and phosphine, because of rehashed use as it upsets organic framework prompting the resistance61,62.

To control these insect pests without polluting the environment, biological products have been screened for their insecticidal efficacy. The lethality of fundamental oils to stored product insects is impacted by the synthetic creation of the oil, which thusly relies upon the source, season and natural conditions, strategy for extraction, time of extraction and plant part utilized63,64. Among the fundamental oil components, the monoterpenoids have drawn more consideration for fumigant efficacy against stored product insects65-67. The monocyclic monoterpene 1, 8-Cineole is the main component of various Eucalyptus which having fumigant activity against T. castaneum66,68. Dangerous impacts of couple of essential oils were surveyed to illustrate conceivable fumigant and contact efficacy against R. dominica, S. oryzae and T. castaneum63.

The leaves of Pinus longifolia ordinarily known as Pine, yield oil which is generally utilized for the assurance from mosquito chomps69. It is likewise utilized as a natural drug in some provincial regions in India69. Essential oil from Coriandrum sativum contains several compounds including linalool, camphor, gterpinene, limonene, geraniol and carvone70. The essential oil of C. sativum showed volatile toxicity to stored product insect pests70,71. In prior studies, fundamental oil from C. sativum showed great fumigant, repellent and poisonous properties against larvae and grown-up of T. castaneum60,72. Additionally, the insecticidal action of three basic oils like pine, eucalyptus and coriander were examined to stored product pests73.

Five fundamental oils in particular Cinnamon oil, Clove oil, Rosemary oil, Bergamot oil and Japanese Mint oil were against C. chinensis grown-ups in view of fumigation technique74. The insecticidal action of fundamental oils against 4 stored insect pests75-79. The efficacy of essential oil based on Ocimum americanum against C. maculatus adults80. The insecticidal properties of some vegetable oils against C. maculatus have been illustrated81-85. Tests were directed to decide lethals focuses (LC50 and 90) and mortality (fumigation to control bruchids in storage86,87. Fundamental oils have been perceived as an imperative source of biopesticides.

Contact toxicity of certain essential oils: Since it was suggested that EOs exerted their efficiency by different modes of action, (a) Act on insect respiration like a fumigant57,66, (b) Act through contact or ingestion, (c) Prevent fertility20, (d) Have an antifeedant efficacy19, (e) Have a repellent effect or change insect behavior22 and (f) Have a combination of all the previously mentioned actions9. The estimation of EOs efficacy against several lepidopterans is directed on acute toxicity by fumigant, contact or oral exposure88,89. The EOs have attracted the scientists in recent years as potential pest control agents90. The EOs are described by fast corruption, selectivity, low mammalian harmfulness and negligible effects on environment91. For instance, EOs from bergamot and geranium gave contact toxicity on T. castaneum and R. dominica. Essential oils were perceived as a vital wellspring of biopesticides especially in the recent years as potential pest control agents89,92,93. According to conformation of EOs, which included terpenes (mono- and sesquiterpenes and derivatives) mixtures. The EOs from bergamot and geranium showed contact toxicity on T. castaneum and R. dominica91.

The partition coefficient of components of EOs may affect their penetration through the lipophilic portion of the cuticle, the interaction with hydrophobic compartments, the degradation of the essential oil component, movement of the compound to the target site94 and the ability of the insect to excrete the compound95. It is known that EOs components with high log p-values are generally more toxic by contact than those with low ones96. By moisture and by detoxification enzymes, hence they present less persistence and reduced risks to non-target organisms97. More several applications and precise timings are therefore needed98. The EOs can cause lethal and sublethal effects on insect biology32,90. Some essential oils namely, garlic, rosemary, mint, thyme, geranium, jojoba and moringa in comparison with Neem formulations were screened for against C. maculatus. Insect growth and reproduction are affected by applying EOs37,99, the deleterious effects of EOs on growth, development and nutrition of insect lepidopteran are recorded88,90,100.

MODE OF ACTION OF ESSENTIAL OILS

Mode of action means studying the specific biochemical interface through which an essential oil produces its effect. Generally, the mode of action comprises the specific enzyme, protein or biological step affected101. Knowing the mode of action is integral for researchers to improve the quality and continuous ability of a product. To understand how oils work, it is necessary to recognize how the pest’s targeted systems normally function. It is important to know the modes of action of essential oils, because it is used to avoid resistance development102.

Mode of action types: There are many actions could be proceeded by plant essential oils such as; contact and fumigant insecticidal activities against stored product pests (Acanthoscelides obtectus)103. Lethal toxicity as well as Knockdown activity through contact were confirmed in the American cockroach104, the German cockroach and the housefly94. Results of those studies concluded an observable neurotoxic site-of-action. Certain essential oil monoterpenes are effective inhibitors of acetylcholinesterase in vitro105, but that achievement may not be related with toxicity to insects in vivo. The physiological effectiveness of essential oils on insects caused symptoms that suggested a neurotoxic mode of action106. Linalool, a monoterpenoid, acted on the nervous system, disturbing ion transport and releasing of acetylcholine esterase into insect pests. Octopamine has a biological role in insects, acting as a neurotransmitter, neurohormone and circulating neurohormone-neuromodulator23 (Fig. 1). Octopamine uses its effects through interaction with 2 classes of receptors which on the basis of pharmacological criterion have been identified octopamine-1 and octopamine-2 interrupting the octopamine functioning in breakdown of nervous system, octopaminergic system displays a biorational target for insect control102.

Acting of limonene and linalool in insects are not fully clear. Limonene (source, Carum carvi (L.)) may cause an increase in the impulsive activity of sensory nerves. This sensitive activity sends false signals to motor nerves and results in twitching, be deficient in coordination and shocks. The central nervous system may also be affected, resulting in other encouragement of motor nerves. Enormous over stimulation of motor nerves helps to rapid knockdown paralysis. Adult fleas and other insects could recover from knockdown, however, unless limonene is harmonized by piperonyl butoxide (PBO). Linalool is also synchronized by PBO107-109.

Mode of action summary: Essential oils can be categorised into groups according to their mode of actions or the way oil destroys or controls the target pest. This is also referred to the primary site of action. For example, one oil may affect insect nerves, while another may affect moulting. There are many mode of actions for various essential oils shown in Table 2.

Fig. 1:
Target sites in insects as possible neuro-transmitter mediated toxic of essential oils (Tripathi et al.23)

Table 2:
Mechanism of action of pesticides of plant origin
Source: El-Wakeil102

EFFICIENCY OF NANOPARTICLES TO MANAGE STORED PRODUCT INSECTS

In last years, consumer awareness of the health hazard from residual toxicity and insect resistance to the pesticides has led the researchers to look for alternative approachs119. One of these alternatives is using of inert dusts such as; clay, rock phosphate, sand, ashes, diatomaceous earth as well as synthetic silica that have been applied as insecticides for thousands of years and are also used in modern storages. In recent years, research on inert dusts as a stored-grain control materials began120 in the 1920's. Normally, insects used variety of lipids on their cuticle for the defense of water barrier on their bodies thus avoiding the death from dryness. A mechanism used by the nanoparticles that becomes absorbed into the cuticle lipids by physisorption thus causing insect death exclusively by physical ways121.

Nanoemulsions are emulsions whose tiny size is uniform and extremely small with the size ranges from 20-200 nm. The use of nanopesticides would be a contemporary measure for the control of insect pests and reducing the toxic effect of synthetic insecticides on the environment122-124. Poly vinyl alcohol (PVA) is a water soluble polymer based on petroleum resources with unique properties such as good transparency, lustre, antielectrostatic properties, chemical resistance and toughness125. Its water solubility, reactivity and quick biodegradability make it a possibility useful material in agricultural and water treatment spots. This strategy will be useful to control the stored product insects in the storages123,126.

Types of nanoformulations: There are many forms of nanoparticles used against stored grain pests; silver nanoparticles like; AgNO3, silica like; diatomaceous earth, synthetic silica (SiO2), sands, Silica Aerogel Aluminium oxide (Al2O3), Zinc oxide (ZnO), Copper oxide (Cu2O), Titanium dioxide (TiO2). The metal nanoparticles can be used for preparing such formulations which will be used as insecticides127,128. Nanostructured materials are frequently fabricated using chemical techniques. It is very important to recognize the target nanoparticles through the scanning tunneling microscope (STM). A great potential for application in environmental protection has been made known by nanotechnology researchers129,130. Nanosilica, a type of unique nanomaterial is prepared from silica. In recent projects, it has been found to be useful as a catalyst and most importantly has been obtained to be useful as nanopesticide. Barik et al.121 have assessed the use of nanosilica as nanoinsecticide. Nanoparticles may be applied in the new formulations of insecticides preparation against different insect species131-133.

Synthesis of silica nanoparticles: Silica nanoparticles are made by hydrolysis and concentration of Tetraethyl Ortho Silicate (TEOS) in ethanol and then adding ammonia as catalyst which used for the synthesis of silica nanoparticles according to protocol of Ibrahim et al.134. In brief, suitable quantities of 99% ethanol, ammonia and deionised water were taken and mix carefully for 5 min. Then proper amount of TEOS was added droplet for 24 h at room temperature. Initially, solution including proper amounts of absolute ethanol, ammonia and deionized water were stimulated for 5 min to ensure complete mixing. Then an appropriate amount of TEOS in 99% ethanol was added to the above solution and the reaction proceeded according to reactants concentrations at ambient temperature for 24 h. Subsequently, the colloidal solution was isolated by high-speed centrifuge and the silica particles had been washed by 99% ethanol for 3 times to remove undesirable particles followed by drying in oven at 100°C for 2 h to prevent continuous reaction135.

Characterization of nanoparticles: Nanoparticles are classified according to their size, morphology and surface charge, using atomic force microscopy, scanning electron microscopy as well as transmission electron microscopy. Traits such as; the size circulation, average particle diameter, charge affect the physical solidity and the in vivo distribution of the nanoparticles136,137. Electron microscopy techniques had been used to determine the properties like surface morphology, size and overall shape. Structures like physical solidity and redispersibility of the polymer dispersion as well as their in vivo performance are affected by the surface charge of the nanoparticles as mentioned by many scientists like Ubrich et al.138 and Rahman et al.139.

Using nanoparticles against major stored product insect pests: Nanotechnology is rising as a highly gorgeous tool for formulation and delivery of insecticide active components as well as enhancing and offering new active ingredients for controlling many of stored product insect pests over the world.

Essential oils-nanoparticles: Nanoemulsions could be useful for the formulations of pesticides140. Nanoparticle materials which newly is expected to reduce the application volume and slow down the quick release kinetics141,142. Using nanoparticles for coating the imidacloprid (IMI) increased its toxicity143. Their results showed that both nanoparticles (silica and silver) were greatly effective on larvae and adults up to 100% mortality. Amorphous silica nano particles had been got to be highly operative against the stored insects causing 100% mortality against T. castaneum144. The activity of insecticidal polyethylene glycol-covered nanoparticles loaded incorporated based garlic essential oil against T. castaneum adult was investigated145. It has been found that mortality of T. castaneum was 80%, almost certainly due to the slow and constant release of the dynamic components from the nanoparticles128,146.

Silver nanoparticles: Silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) have been manufactured using various natural products like Azadirachta indica (Tripathi et al.)147; Glycine max (Vivekanandhan et al.)148 and Camellia sinensis (Begum et al.)149. The ethanolic leaf extract of Annona squamosa was assessed against S. oryzae150. The entomotoxic effects of the Silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) against S. oryzae were assessed128. The aqueous extracts of E. prostrate leaves which synthesized Ag NPs have the prospective to be used for S. oryzae controlling123. The insecticidal activity of nanostructured alumina against S. oryzae and R. dominica, in stores151, who stated that a significant mortality was recorded after 3 days of continuous exposure to nanostructured alumina-treated wheat.

Aluminum and zinc oxides: Two nanomaterials namely aluminum and zinc oxides have been tested against adults of S. oryzae in the laboratory152. Their findings revealed that aluminum nanoparticles (Al2O3) were well effective agents in comparison with zinc nanoparticles (ZnO) which had reasonably effect on S. oryzae. Mortality (%) increased by increasing the exposure time and concentration levels. The nanoparticles of aluminium oxide had been highly effective against S. oryzae and considerably reduced the insect loss and had enormously oviposition deterrent effect153-155, they mentioned that zinc oxide (ZnO) nanoparticle high efficiency in declining S. oryzae infestation. Mortality of S. oryzae reached to 86% by using Aluminium nanoparticles as well as to 65% of S. oryzae by applying Zinc nanoparticals156. Al2O3 caused the greatest deterrent effect on S. oryzae and S. zeamais compared to nanoparticle of Titanium oxide (TiO2)157. The nanocides can be removed by traditional milling procedures. Applying aluminum and zinc oxides nanoparticles are considered as seed protecting agents152.

Diatomaceous earths: Diatomaceous earth (DE) is the residue of microscopic plants (diatoms) that existed in the oceans. The insecticidal activity of DE is due to the razor sharp edges of the diatom remains. The DEs with slighter particle sizes are more toxic than the larger ones. Besides particle size, other characteristics affected DEs insecticidal effectiveness, such as active surface and oil adsorption ability, SiO2 content, moisture content, etc158-162. As insects are crawling throughout the treated grain and dustbins, the DE comes in contact with the insects and the sharp edges penetrate the insect’s exoskeleton. The body fluids were sucked by the powdery DE causing death from dehydration163. Several diatomaceous earths formulations have been successfully assessed against several stored-product insects58,164,165. It is played a vital role, if it possesses high amorphous silica content with uniform size distribution135. It caused 100% mortality by spraying amorphous silica nanoparticles on Corcyra cephalonica. Nano-DE powerfully killed the eggs of T. confusum more than T. castaneum after 120 storage days165. Also, adult emergence (%) were strongly declined by DE and Nano-DE treatments164, who confirmed that efficiency of Nano-DE on infestation (%) of T. confusum were more efficient than on T. castaneum.

Silicon dioxide nanoparticles: The propensity for applying nanoparticles for insect control has improved. Surface-functionalized silica nanoparticles were obtained to be very toxic against adults of S. oryzae166. Amorphous SNP was found to be highly useful causing more than 90% mortality of S. oryzae153. Two silicon dioxide nanoparticles of Aerosil and Nanosav caused more mortality to R. dominica and T. confusum adults. The silica nanoparticles have a high toxicity on R. dominica and T. confusum adults. The T. confusum was more tolerant than R. dominica167.

Nanosilica (nanobiopesticide): Amorphous nanosilica is one of the promising new substances that may achieve a good and safe management level for the stored product insects. The ones nanosilicas may be absorbed into the cuticular lipid stuffs through physisorption and hence inflicting loss of life of those insects totally. Software of nanoparticles on the leaf and stem surface does no longer alter both photosynthesis and respiration in several agencies of horticultural and crop plants168. Surface charged modified hydrophobic nanosilica (~3-5 nm) could be used for controlling range of insect pests successfully for caring the humankind169-173. Nanoparticles offered a greater surface part and circulate easily and in lepidopteran insects, therefore they are considered special harness substances as well as they will be removed during 24 h from the insect body172. Particles considerably smaller than micron order would be less injurious in the insect hemolymph174. Using hydrophobic silica nanoparticles widely decreased the seed damage potential of C. maculatus which was noticed to be significant compared to control175. It is projected that insecticidal efficacy of the silica becomes enhanced if the particles are finely separated174.

Mode of action of nanoparticles: The mechanism relies on those insects used a variety of cuticular lipids for keeping their water barrier and thus avoid death from waterlessness. Several studies reported the potential of some nanomaterials as insecticides in insect management programs such as nanosilica167,176 or silver nanoparticle177 and aluminum nanoparticles151. Nano-silica gets absorbed into the cuticular lipids of insects by physisorption causing death of insects purely by physical resources. The following steps would be followed, if nanoencapsulation is released: diffusion, biodegradation, dissolution and osmotic pressure with an accurate pH178,179. Aluminosilicate filled nanotube could stick to surfaces of plant leaves while nanoingredients of nanotube have the ability to stick to the surface hair of insects and goes into the insect body which affects directly on many physiological jobs180. The potentized drugs pointedly increased some plant characteristics such as; chlorophyll, protein, water content in the leaves and plant growth as compared to the control181. Research on Bombyx mori showed that nanoparticle might stimulate more production of fibroin protein which helps in producing carbon nanotube in future182,183. Using nanoparticles in insect control programs must be geared toward introduction of faster and ecofriendly insecticides in the coming years184. Manufacturers are focusing on formulation of nanoscale insecticides for delivery into the target host tissue through nanoencapsulation.

EOs IN INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT

Using essential oils in a successful IPM programs, different methods have to be integrated together physical control, biological control and nanoparticles containing essential oils for controlling the most destructive stored product pests. Today it is very clear that EOs can be in harmony and more effective in IPM programs to achieving more safety and environmental health. Damage to grain was lower in Oryza sativa treated with the essential oils of Cymbopogon citratus and Cymbopogon nardus than in the control rice grains185. Applying the crude plant extracts of Citrus sinensis and C. aurantium caused 89 and 76% mortality to S. oryzae and R. dominica, respectively after 3 days post-treatment186. The essential oil of Cymbopogon martini was an effective repellent against C. chinensis and T. castaneum. The lethal and sublethal activity of ethylene glycol nanoparticles based on essential oils are assessed against T. castaneum and R. dominica. Additionally, no chemical derivates were noticed during this period154.

Table 3:
Effect of sack treatment with unedible oils and neem seed formulations on the total number of eggs laid on mung bean seeds
Source: Dimetry et al.34, Concs: Concentrations

Table 4:
Insecticidal activity of two oils on C. maculatus adults
Source: Hafez et al.37

CASE STUDY

Using essential oils for controlling C. maculatus adults: This is one of NRC research projects dealing with the current review, diverse formulations of neem and oil extracted from Acorus calamus were assessed for controlling C. maculatus infestations in store of Vigna radiata. Oviposition, infestation (%) and adult emergence were recorded after puting seeds in treated cloth sacks for nine months. For each treatment, cloth sacs were soaked once for 5 min in the formulated solutions and allowed to dry before mung bean seeds were placed. Treatment effects on mung bean seed flavor, consumer acceptability and germination were investigated at the end of the storage period. The results showed that emergence of adults were completely inhibited immediately after applications for all treatments, except NeemAzal F which a few number of living adults were found. The A. calamus oil prevented beetle oviposition on the sacks and the development of infestations for at least 5 months (Table 3). Oviposition was avoided by ethyl oleate for 2 months. Neem prevented oviposition and infestation development for 3 months. Untreated sacks (control) had been infested completely in the first 3 months of storage. No harmful effects had been detected on germination, flavor and consumer acceptability34.

In another study conducted by Hafez et al.37, who tested efficacy of Acorus calamus and ethyl oleate oils against C. maculatus adults and immature stages. The results showed lethal effects of both ethyl oleate and A. calamus oils; conversely, A. calamus oil proved to be more toxic to the adults comparing to the ethyl oleate oil (Table 4-6). Ethyl oleate had an inconsiderable effect on the incubation period as well as the resulting eggs. The A. calamus oil decreased the hatchability with a serious increase in sterility percentage. The two tested oils had slight extension in either larval or pupal stage of the resulting progeny of C. maculatus. Both oils showed oviposition deterrent activity towards C. maculatus adults37.

ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF PLANT ESSENTIAL OILS

The advantages are reflected in their rapid degradation, quick action, low toxicity to warm-blooded organisms, they are less stable and therefore have smaller negative impact on beneficial and non-target organisms18. They typically kill insects quickly or prevent their feeding immediately after application. Botanical insecticides could have both the act of advantages and disadvantages when being used in environment187. The features of the plant oils were calculated in some points; rapid degradation, fast act, low toxicity to warm blood organisms and because their stability are lower in nature188. For this reason, they are smaller negative impact on the beneficial and non target organisms. Also, essential oils after short time of application can kill their target insect or prevent their feeding and most of them aren’t or a little toxic when inserted into the body through the mouth, they are safe to warm- blooded organisms18. Due to these facts the essential oils are considered to be safer as compared to the many insecticides.

The essential oils also have some disadvantages as they are rapidly degraded in environment and needed their frequent use122,150. Essential oils are expensive than synthetic insecticides, many of essential oils after long studies and many experimental tests of applications are still not available for many requirements during their registration steps188. Although deemed to be considerably less toxic in comparison to synthetic insecticides, certain EOs could be used compatibility with biocontrol agents to be safer for humans and fish187,189-192.

Table 5:
Effect of two oils against the adult stage of C. maculatus
Source: Hafez et al.37

Table 6:
Effect of seed treatment with vegetable oils on the fecundity and percentage reduction in the total output of eggs of C. maculatus adult females
Source: Hafez et al.37, *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ##p<0.001

FUTURE APPLICATION OF ESSENTIAL OIL PRODUCTS

The development of EOs as plant protection products is especially suited to organic farming. They are natural in origin and biodegradable and have diverse physiological targets within insects and may also interrupted the evolution of insect resistance. According to progressing activities in essential oils works, there were many publications concern about nanoparticles against grains stored products, Silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) were manufactured by using aqueous leaves extracts of Euphorbia prostrata127,128. Assessments of the insecticidal activity had been conducted for identifying the efficacy of aqueous leaves extracts of E. prostrata, silver nitrate (AgNO3) solution (1 mM) and synthesized Ag NPs against the adult of S. oryzae. Nanoemulsions prepared from the tested plant oils showed a considerable insecticidal activity against many insect pests124,130,193. With a rational design related to their extraction, formulation, application and toxicological evaluation, these oils would play a role in insect management.

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

Insecticides based on essential oils might be applied as fumigants, granular formulations or direct sprays with a range of effects from lethal toxicity to repellence and/or oviposition deterrence. In terms of specific constraints, the efficacy of these materials falls short when compared to synthetic pesticides. Application of nanostructured materials for pollution prevention through environmentally benign synthesis and manufacturing are also being developed. In fact numerous products enabled by nanotechnology are formerly in the market and nanoparticles in eco-friendly insecticides, because of their biodegradable nature, systemicity after application, capacity to alter the behaviour of target pests and favourable safety profile and most likely to be adopted for use in the near future. So, it is recommended that the silica nanoparticles could be used effectively in a stored grain IPM and will be efficient against many insects.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This review article revealed that plant oils either in normal status or nanoparticles could be beneficial for the researchers, farmers and traders to protect and manage stored product insects which caused severe losses and may be dangerous for human by transferring fungal diseases.

REFERENCES

  • Raja, N., S. Albert, S. Ignacimutha and S. Dorn, 2001. Effect of plant volatile oils in protecting stored cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walpers against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) infestation. J. Stored Prod. Res., 37: 127-132.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ogendo, J.O., M. Kostyukovsky, U. Ravid, J.C. Matasyoh and A.L. Deng et al., 2008. Bioactivity of Ocimum gratissimum L. oil and two of its constituents against five insect pests attacking stored food products. J. Stored Prod. Res., 44: 328-334.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Upadhyay, R.K. and S. Ahmad, 2011. Management strategies for control of stored grain insect pests in farmer stores and public ware houses. World J. Agric. Sci., 7: 527-549.


  • Arabi, F., S. Moharramipour and F. Sefidkon, 2008. Chemical composition and insecticidal activity of essential oil from Perovskia abrotanoides (Lamiaceae) against Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci., 28: 144-150.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Koul, O., S. Walia and G.S. Dhaliwal, 2008. Essential oils as green pesticides: Potential and constraints. Biopestic. Int., 4: 63-84.
    Direct Link    


  • Kljajic, P. and I. Peric, 2006. Susceptibility to contact insecticides of granary weevil Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) originating from different locations in the former Yugoslavia. J. Stored Prod. Res., 42: 149-161.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Isman, M.B., S. Miresmailli and C. Machial, 2011. Commercial opportunities for pesticides based on plant essential oils in agriculture, industry and consumer products. Phytochem. Rev., 10: 197-204.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Isman, M.B., 2006. Botanical insecticides, deterrents and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 51: 45-66.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Shaaya, E., M. Kostjukovski, J. Eilberg and C. Sukprakarn, 1997. Plant oils as fumigants and contact insecticides for the control of stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res., 33: 7-15.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Li, Y., H. Zou, L. Wang, Z. Nai and W. Li et al., 2001. Insecticidal activity of extracts from Eupatorium adenophorum against four stored grain insects. Kunchong Zhishi, 38: 214-216.
    Direct Link    


  • Hagstrum, D.W. and B. Subramanyam, 2009. Stored-Product Insect Resource. AACC International, Minnesota, ISBN: 9781891127663 pp: 509


  • Hagstrum, D.W., T.W. Phillips and G. Cuperus, 2012. Stored Product Protection. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, USA, ISBN: 978-0-9855003-0-6, pp: 350


  • Zanuncio, J.C., S.A. Mourao, L.C. Martinez, C.F. Wilcken and F.S. Ramalho et al., 2016. Toxic effects of the neem oil (Azadirachta indica) formulation on the stink bug predator, Podisus nigrispinus (Heteroptera: Pentatomidae). Scient. Rep., Vol. 6.
    CrossRef    


  • Parmar, V.S., S.C. Jain, K.S. Bisht, R. Jain and P. Taneja et al., 1997. Phytochemistry of the genus Piper. Phytochemistry, 46: 597-673.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Boulogne, I., P. Petit, H. Ozier-Lafontaine, L. Desfontaines and G. Loranger-Merciris, 2012. Insecticidal and antifungal chemicals produced by plants: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett., 10: 325-347.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chang, S.T. and S.S. Cheng, 2002. Antitermitic activity of leaf essential oils and components from Cinnamomum osmophleum. J. Agric. Food Chem., 50: 1389-1392.


  • Bakkali, F., S. Averbeck, D. Averbeck and M. Idaomar, 2008. Biological effects of essential oils-A review. Food Chem. Toxicol., 46: 446-475.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • El-Wakeil, N., N. Gaafar, A. Sallam and C. Volkmar, 2013. Side Effects of Insecticides on Natural Enemies and Possibility of Their Integration in Plant Protection Strategies. In: Insecticides: Development of Safer and More Effective Technologies, Trdan, S. (Ed.). Chapter 1, InTech Publisher, Rijeka, Croatia, ISBN: 978-953-51-0958-7, pp: 3-56


  • Gbolade, A.A., 2001. Plant-derived insecticides in the control of malaria vector. J. Trop. Med. Plants, 2: 91-97.
    Direct Link    


  • Marimutu, S., G. Gurusubramania and S.S. Krishna, 1997. Effect of exposure of eggs to vapours from essential oils on egg mortality development and adult emergence in Egrias vittella (F) (Lepidoptera Moctuidae). Biol. Agric. Hortic., 14: 303-307.


  • Oyedele, A.O., L.O. Orafidiya, A. Lamikanra and J.I. Olaifa, 2000. Volatility and mosquito repellency of Hemizygia welwitschii oil and its formulations. Insect Sci. Applied, 20: 123-128.
    Direct Link    


  • Landolt, P.J., R.W. Hofstetter and L.L. Biddick, 1999. Plant essential oils as arrestants and repellents for neonate larvae of the codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Environ. Entomol., 28: 954-960.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tripathi, A.K., S. Upadhyay, M. Bhuiyan and P.B. Bhattacharya, 2009. A review on prospects of essential oils as biopesticide in insect-pest management. J. Pharmacogn. Phytother., 1: 52-63.
    Direct Link    


  • Re, L., S. Barocci, S. Sonnino, A. Mencarelli and C. Vivani et al., 2000. Linalool modifies the nicotinic receptor-ion channel kinetics at the mouse neuromuscular junction. Pharmacol. Res., 42: 177-182.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tripathi, A.K., V. Prajapati, S.P.S. Khanuja and S. Kumar, 2003. Effect of d-limonene on three stored-product beetles. J. Econ. Entomol., 96: 990-995.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Isman, M.B., 1999. Pesticides based on plant essential oils: Pestic. Outlook, 2: 68-72.


  • Isman, M.B., 2000. Plant essential oils for pest and disease management. Crop Protect., 19: 603-608.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Isman, M.B. and C.M. Machial, 2006. Pesticides Based on Plant Essential Oils: From Traditional Practice to Commercialization. In: Naturally Occurring Bioactive Compounds, Rai, M. and M.C. Carpinella (Eds.). Chapter 2, Elsevier, New York, USA., ISBN-13: 9780080464923, pp: 29-44


  • Desneux, N., A. Decourtye and J.M. Delpuech, 2007. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 52: 81-106.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Alfaro, R.I., J.H. Borden, L.J. Harris, W.W. Nijholt and L.H. McMullen, 1984. Pine oil, a feeding deterrent for the white pine weevil, Pissodes strobi (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Can. Entomol., 116: 41-44.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gonzalez, J.O.W., M.M. Gutierrez, A.P. Murray and A.A. Ferrero, 2011. Composition and biological activity of essential oils from Labiatae against Nezara viridula (Hemiptera: Pentatomidae) soybean pest. Pest Manage. Sci., 67: 948-955.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • González, J.O.W., R.A. Laumann, S. Da Silveira, M.C.B. Moraes, M. Borges and A.A. Ferrero, 2013. Lethal and sublethal effects of four essential oils on the egg parasitoids Trissolcus basalis. Chemosphere, 92: 608-615.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Regnault-Roger, C., 1997. The potential of botanical essential oils for insect pest control. Integ. Pest. Manage. Rev., 2: 25-34.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dimetry, N.Z., M. Hafez and M.H. Abbass, 2003. Efficiency of Some Oils and Neem Formulations against the Cowpea Beetle, Callosobruchus C. maculatus. In: Biopesticides and Pest Management: Volume 2, Koul, O., G.S. Dhaliwal, S.S. Marwaha and I.K. Arora (Eds.). Campus Books International, New Delhi, ISBN: 8180300153, pp: 1-10


  • Regnault-Roger, C. and B.J.R. Philogene, 2008. Past and current prospects for the use of botanicals and plant allelochemicals in integrated pest management. Pharm. Biol., 46: 41-52.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Regnault-Roger, C., C. Vincent and J.T. Arnason, 2012. Essential oils in insect control: Low-risk products in a high-stakes world. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 57: 405-424.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hafez, M., N.Z. Dimetry and M.H. Abbass, 2014. Insecticidal and biological efficacy of two vegetable oils against Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) under laboratory conditions. Arch. Phytopathol. Plant Prot., 47: 1942-1955.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Paruch, E., J. Nawrot and C. Wawrzenczk, 2001. Lactones: Part 11. Feeding-deterrent activity of some bi- and tricyclic terpenoid lactones. Pest ManagE. Sci., 55: 776-780.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Tripathi, A.K., V. Prajapati and S. Kumar, 2003. Bioactivity of l-carvone, d-carvone and dihydrocarvone towards three stored product beetles. J. Econ. Entomol., 96: 1594-1601.
    PubMed    


  • Chowdhury, H., R.D. Singh, P. Mandal and A. Dutta, 2000. Antifeedant activity of two essential oils on lepidopteran insects. Pestic. Res. J., 12: 137-140.


  • Agarwal, M. and S. Walia, 2003. Pest control potential of phytochemicals derived from Curcuma longa and Zingiber officinale. Proceedings of the International Conference of Pesticides, Environment and Food Security, (ICPEFS’03), New Delhi, India, pp: 110-119.


  • Koschier, E.L. and K.A. Sedy, 2001. Effects of plant volatiles on the feeding and oviposition of Thrips tabaci. In: Thrips and Tospoviruses, Marullo, R. and L. Mound (Eds.). CSIRO, Australia, pp: 185-187


  • Tandon, S., A.K. Mittal, V.K. Kasana and A.K. Pant, 2004. Antifeedant activity of elsholtzia essential oils against Spodoptera litura. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci., 12: 197-198.


  • Kedia, A., B. Prakash, P.K. Mishra, P. Singh and N.K. Dubey, 2015. Botanicals as eco friendly biorational alternatives of synthetic pesticides against Callosobruchus spp. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae)-a review. J. Food Sci. Technol., 52: 1239-1257.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Phillips, T.W. and J.E. Throne., 2010. Biorational approaches to managing stored-product insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 55: 375-397.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Chen, H., R.O. Akinkurolere and H. Zhang, 2011. Fumigant activity of plant essential oil from Armoracia rusticana (L.) on Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) and Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Afr. J. Biotechnol., 10: 1200-1205.
    Direct Link    


  • Maedeh, M., I. Hamzeh, D. Hossein, A. Majid and R.K. Reza, 2012. Bioactivity of essential oil from Zingiber officinale (Zingiberaceae) against three stored-product insect species. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants., 15: 122-133.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Maede, M., I. Hamzeh, D. Hossein, A. Majid and R.K. Reza, 2011. Bioactivity of essential oil from Satureja hortensis (Laminaceae) against three stored-product insect species. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 10: 6620-6627.
    Direct Link    


  • Jesser, E.N., J.O. Werdin-González, A.P. Murray and A.A. Ferrero, 2017. Efficacy of essential oils to control the Indian meal moth, Plodia interpunctella (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol., 20: 1122-1129.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Enan, E., 2001. Insecticidal activity of essential oils: Octopaminergic sites of action. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part C: Toxicol. Pharmacol., 130: 325-337.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Sfara, V., E.N. Zerba and R.A. Alzogaray, 2009. Fumigant insecticidal activity and repellent effect of five essential oils and seven monoterpenes on first-instar nymphs of Rhodnius prolixus. J. Med. Entomol., 46: 511-515.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Toloza, A.C., J. Zygadlo, G.M. Cueto, F. Biurrun, E. Zerba and M.I. Picollo, 2006. Fumigant and repellent properties of essential oils and component compounds against permethrin-resistant Pediculus humanus capitis (Anoplura: Pediculidae) from Argentina. J. Med. Entomol., 43: 889-895.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kordali, S., I. Aslan, O. Calmasur and A. Cakir, 2006. Toxicity of essential oils isolated from three Artemisia species and some of their major components to granary weevil, Sitophilus granarius (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Ind. Crops Prod., 23: 162-170.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Negahban, M. and S. Moharamipour, 2007. Efficiency of Artemisia sieberi Besser and Artemisia scoparia Waldst Et Kit essential oils on biological activity of Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Col: Bruchidae). Iran. J. Med. Arom. Plant, 23: 146-156.


  • Ayvaz, A., O. Sagdic, S. Karaborklu and I. Ozturk, 2010. Insecticidal activity of the essential oils from different plants against three stored-product insects. J. Insect Sci., 10: 21-21.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Allahvaisi, S., M. Maroufpoor, A. Abdolmaleki, S.A. Hoseini and S. Ghasemzadeh, 2011. The effect of plant oils for reducing contamination of stored packaged-foodstuffs. J. Plant Prot. Res., 51: 82-86.


  • Athanassiou, C.G., N.G. Kavallieratos, C.B. Dimizas, B.J. Vayias and Ž. Tomanović, 2006. Factors affecting the insecticidal efficacy of the diatomaceous earth formulation SilicoSec® against adults of the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Applied Entomol. Zool., 41: 201-207.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kim, S., C. Park, M.H. Ohh, H.C. Cho and Y.J. Ahn, 2003. Contact and fumigant activities of aromatic plant extracts and essential oils against Lasioderma serricorne (Coleoptera: Anobiidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 39: 11-19.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Usha Rani, P. and P. Rajasekharreddy, 2010. Insecticidal activity of (2n-octylcycloprop-1-enyl)-octanoic acid (I) against three Coleopteran stored product insects from Sterculia foetida (L.). J. Pest Sci., 83: 273-279.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Islam, M.S., M.M. Hasan, W. Xiong, S.C. Zhang and C.L. Lei, 2009. Fumigant and repellent essential oils against stored pests. J. Biopest., 5: 120-128.
    Direct Link    


  • Zeng, L., 1999. Development and counter measures of phosphine resistance in stored grain insects in Guandong of China. Proceedings of 7th Inenational Working Conference on Stored-Product Protection, October 14-19, 1998, Beijing, China, pp: 642-647.


  • Zhang, Z. and C.W. Van Epenhuijsen, 2004. Improved envirosol fumigation methods for disinfesting export cut Xowers and foliage crops. New Zealand Institute for Crop and Food Research Limited, Palmerston North, New Zealand.


  • Lee, S.E., B.H. Lee, W.S. Choi, B.S. Park, J.G. Kim and B.C. Campbell, 2001. Fumigant toxicity of volatile natural products from Korean spices and medicinal plants towards the rice weevil, Sitophilus oryzae (L.). Pest Manage. Sci., 57: 548-553.
    Direct Link    


  • Sahaf, B.Z., S. Moharramipour and M.H. Meshkatalsadat, 2008. Fumigant toxicity of essential oil from Vitex pseudo-negundo against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and Sitophilus oryzae (L.). J. Asia Pac. Entomol., 11: 175-179.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rahman, M.M. and G.H. Schmidt, 1999. Effect of Acorus calamus (L.) (Araceae) essential oil vapours from various origins on Callosobruchus phaseoli (Gyllenhal) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 35: 285-295.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rajendran, S. and V. Sriranjini, 2008. Plant products as fumigants for stored-product insect control. J. Stored Prod. Res., 44: 126-135.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Houghton, P.J., Y. Ren and M.J. Howes, 2006. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors from plants and fungi. Nat. Prod. Rep., 23: 181-199.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Lee, B.H., P.C. Annis, F. Tumaalii and S.E. Lee, 2004. Fumigant toxicity of Eucalyptus blakelyi and Melaleuca fulgens essential oils and 1, 8-cineole against different development stages of the rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae. Phytoparasitica, 32: 498-506.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ansari, M.A., P.K. Mittal, R.K. Razdan and U. Sreehari, 2005. Larvicidal and mosquito repellent activities of pine (Pinus longifolia, family: pinaceae) oil. J. Vector Borne Dis., 42: 95-99.
    Direct Link    


  • Lopez, M.D., M.J. Jordan and M.J. Pascual-Villalobos, 2008. Toxic compounds in essential oils of coriander, caraway and basil active against stored rice pests. J. Stored Prod. Res., 44: 273-278.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pascual-Villalobos, M.J. and M.C. Ballesta-Acosta, 2003. Chemical variation in an Ocimum basilicum germplasm collection and activity of the essential oils on Callosobruchus maculatus. Biochem. Syst. Ecol., 31: 673-679.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Farhana, K., H. Islam, E.H. Emran and N. Islam, 2006. Toxicity and repellant activity of three spice materials on Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) adults. J. Bio-Sci., 14: 131-134.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rani, P.U., 2012. Fumigant and contact toxic potential of essential oils from plant extracts against stored product pests. J. Biopesticides, 5: 120-128.
    Direct Link    


  • Trivedi, A., N. Nayak and J. Kumar, 2017. Fumigant toxicity study of different essential oils against stored grain pest Callosobruchus chinensis. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., 6: 1708-1711.
    Direct Link    


  • Saleem, S., M. ul Hasan, M. Sagheer and S.T. Sahi, 2014. Insecticidal activity of essential oils of four medicinal plants against different stored grain insect pests. Pak. J. Zool., 46: 1407-1414.


  • Rozman, V., I. Kalinovic and Z. Korunic, 2007. Toxicity of naturally occurring compounds of Lamiaceae and Lauraceae to three stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res., 43: 349-355.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Abdelgaleil, S.A.M., M.I.E. Mohamed, M.E.I. Badawy and S.A.A. El-Arami, 2009. Fumigant and contact toxicities of monoterpenes to Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and their inhibitory effects on acetylcholinesterase activity. J. Chem. Ecol., 35: 518-525.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pugazhvendan, S.R., P.R. Ross and K. Elumalai, 2012. Insecticidal and repellant activities of plants oil against stored grain pest, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis., 2: S412-S415.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Germinara, G.S., M.G. Di Stefano, L. De Acutis, S. Pati, S. Delfine, A. De Cristofaro and G. Rotundo, 2017. Bioactivities of Lavandula angustifolia essential oil against the stored grain pest Sitophilus granarius. Bull. Insectology., 70: 129-138.


  • Iboudo, Z.L.C.B., R.C.H. Dabire, I.O. Nebie, S. Dicko, A.M. Dugravot and A. Cortesero, 2010. Biological activity and persistence off our essential oils towards the main pest of stored cowpeas, Callosobruchus maculates (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 46: 124-128.


  • Keita, S.M., C. Vincent, J.P. Schmit, J.T. Arnason and A. Belanger, 2001. Efficacy of essential oil of Ocimum basilicum L. and O. gratissimum L. applied as an insecticidal fumigant and powder to control Callosobruchus maculatus (Fab.) [Coleoptera: Bruchidae]. J. Stored Prod. Res., 37: 339-349.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ketoh, G.K., H.K. Koumaglo and I.A. Glitho, 2005. Inhibition of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) development with essential oil extracted from Cymbopogon schoenanthus L. Spreng. (Poaceae) and the wasp Dinarmus basalis (Rondani) (Hymenoptera: Pteromalidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 41: 363-371.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sanon A., Z. Ilboudo, L.C.B. Dabire, R.C.H Nebie, I.O Dicko and J.P. Monge, 2006. Effects of Hyptis spicigera Lam. (Labiatae) on the behaviour and development of Callosobruchus maculatus F. (Coleoptera: Bruchidae), a pest of stored cowpeas. Int. J. Pest Manage., 52: 117-123.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ngamo, L.S.T., A. Goudoum, B.M. Ngassoum, P.M. Mapongmetsem, G. Lognay, F. Malaisse and T. Hance, 2007. Chronic toxicity of essential oils of 3 local aromatic plants towards Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Afr. J. Agric. Res., 2: 164-167.
    Direct Link    


  • Souza, V.N.D., C.R.F.D. Oliveira, C.H.C. Matos and D.K.F.D. Almeida, 2016. Fumigation toxicity of essential oils against Rhyzopertha dominica (F.) in stored maize grain. Rev. Caatinga, 29: 435-440.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Don-Pedro, K.N., 1996. Fumigant toxicity is the major route of insecticidal activity of citrus peel essential oils. Pest. Sci., 46: 71-78.
    Direct Link    


  • Don-Pedro, K.N., 1996. Investigation of single and joint fumigant insecticidal action of citruspeel oil components. Pestic. Sci., 46: 79-84.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sousa, R.M.O.F., J.S. Rosa, L. Oliveira, A. Cunha and M. Fernandes-Ferreira, 2015. Activities of apiaceae essential oils and volatile compounds on hatchability, development, reproduction and nutrition of Pseudaletia unipuncta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Ind. Crops Prod., 63: 226-237.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dimetry, N.Z., 2014. Different Plant Families as Bioresource for Pesticides. In: Advances in Plant Biopesticides, Singh, D., (Ed.). Springer, India, pp: 1–20


  • Dimetry, N.Z., S.S. Ibrahim, H.M. Metwally and H. El-Behery, 2018. Fumigant potential of some essential oils against the cowpea beetle "Callosobruchus maculatus" (F.) under laboratory conditions. Biosci. Res., 15: 2364-2373.


  • Gonzalez, J.O.W., M.M. Gutierrez, A.A. Ferrero and B.F. Band, 2014. Essential oils nanoformulations for stored-product pest control-characterization and biological properties. Chemosphere, 100: 130-138.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mahfuz, I. and M. Khalequzzaman, 2007. Contact and fumigant toxicity of essential oils against Callosobruchus maculatus. Uni. J. Zool. Rajshahi Univ., 26: 63-66.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dimetry, N.Z., A.H. Amin, A.E. Bayoumi, E.M. Hoballah and D.A. Yousef, 2018. Neem nano formulations as a green revolution in the future for controlling the cotton leafworm Spodoptera littoralis. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Agriculture, Forestry and Life Sciences, September 6-8, 2018, Budapest, Hungary, pp: 257-272.


  • Rice, P.J. and J.R. Coats, 1994. Insecticidal properties of monoterpenoid derivatives to the house fly (Diptera: Muscidae) and red flour beetle (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Pestic. Sci., 41: 195-202.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • O’Donnell, M., 2008. Insect excretory mechanisms. Adv. Insect Physiol., 35: 1-122.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jang, Y.S., Y.C. Yang, D.S. Choi and Y.J. Ahn, 2005. Vapor phase toxicity of marjoram oil compounds and their related monoterpenoids to Blattella germanica (Orthoptera: Blattellidae). J. Agric. Food Chem., 53: 7892-7898.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Guleria, S. and A.K. Tiku, 2009. Botanicals in Pest Management: Current Status and Future Perspectives. In: Integrated Pest Management: Innovation-Development Process, Peshin, R. and A.K. Dhawan (Eds.). Springer, Netherlands, pp: 317–329


  • Grdiša, M. and K. Gršić, 2013. Botanical insecticides in plant protection. Agri. Conspectus Scientificus., 78: 85-93.
    Direct Link    


  • Athanassiou, C.G., P.U. Rani and N.G. Kavallieratos, 2014. The use of Plant Extracts for Stored Product Protection. In: Advances in Plant Biopesticides, Singh, D. (Ed.). Springer, New York, USA., ISBN: 9788132220060, pp: 131-147


  • Akhtar, Y. and M.B. Isman, 2004. Comparative growth inhibitory and antifeedant effects of plant extracts and pure allelochemicals on four phytophagous insect species. J. Applied Entomol., 128: 32-38.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bloomquist, J.R., D.R. Boina, E. Chow, P.R. Carlier, M. Reina and A. Gonzalez-Coloma, 2008. Mode of action of the plant-derived silphinenes on insect and mammalian GABAA receptor/chloride channel complex. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol., 91: 17-23.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • El-Wakeil, N.E., 2013. Botanical pesticides and their mode of action. Gesunde Pflanzen, 65: 125-149.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Regnault-Roger, C., A. Hamraoui, M. Holeman, E. Theron and R. Pinel, 1993. Insecticidal effect of essential oils from mediterranean plants upon Acanthoscelides obtectus Say (Coleoptera, Bruchidae), a pest of kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J. Chem. Ecol., 19: 1233-1244.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ngoh, S.P., L.E.W. Choo, F.Y. Pang, Y. Huang, M.R. Kini and S.H. Ho, 1998. Insecticidal and repellent properties of nine volatile constituents of essential oils against the American cockroach, Periplaneta americana (L.). Pesticide Sci., 54: 261-268.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Miyazawa, M., H. Watanabe and H. Kameoka, 1997. Inhibition of acetylcholinesterase activity by monoterpenoids with a p-menthane skeleton. J. Agric. Food Chem., 45: 677-679.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kostyukovsky, M., A. Rafaeli, C. Gileadi, N. Demchenko and E. Shaaya, 2002. Activation of octopaminergic receptors by essential oil constituents isolated from aromatic plants: Possible mode of action against insect pests. Pest Manage. Sci., 58: 1101-1106.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Abdelgaleil, S.A.M. and A.F. El-Aswad, 2005. Antifeedant and growth inhibitory effects of tetranortriterpenoids isolated from three meliaceous species on the cotton leafworm, Spodoptera littoralis (Boisd.). J. Applied Sci. Res., 1: 234-241.


  • Abdelgaleil, S.A.M., M.A. Abbassy, A.S.H. Belal and M.A.A. Abdel Rasoul, 2008. Bioactivity of two major constituents isolated from the essential oil of Artemisia judaica L. Bioresour. Technol., 99: 5947-5950.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Rattan, R.S., 2010. Mechanism of action of insecticidal secondary metabolites of plant origin. Crop Protect., 29: 913-920.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fields, P.G., Y.S. Xie and X. Hou, 2001. Repellent effect of pea (Pisum sativum) fractions against stored-product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res., 37: 359-370.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Papachristos, D.P. and D.C. Stamopoulos, 2002. Repellent, toxic and reproduction inhibitory effects of essential oil vapours on Acanthoscelides obtectus (Say) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 38: 117-128.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kavallieratos, N.G., C.G. Athanassiou, B.J. Vayias and S.N. Maistrou, 2007. Influence of temperature on susceptibility of Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) populations to three modified diatomaceous earth formulations. Florida Entomol., 90: 616-626.
    Direct Link    


  • Ratra, G.S. and J.E. Casida, 2001. GABA receptor subunit composition relative to insecticide potency and selectivity. Toxicol. Lett., 122: 215-222.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Priestley, C.M., E.M. Williamson, K.A. Wafford and D.B. Sattelle, 2003. Thymol, a constituent of thyme essential oil, is a positive allosteric modulator of human GABAA receptors and a homo-oligomeric GABA receptor from Drosophila melanogaster. Br. J. Pharmacol., 140: 1363-1372.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Casida, J.E., 1973. Pyrethrum the Natural Insecticide. 1st Edn., Academic Press, Inc., New York, USA., pp: 329


  • Enan, E.E., 2005. Molecular and pharmacological analysis of an octopamine receptor from American cockroach and fruit fly in response to plant essential oils. Arch. Insect Biochem. Physiol., 59: 161-171.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Enan, E.E., 2005. Molecular response of Drosophila melanogaster tyramine receptor cascade to plant essential oils. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 35: 309-321.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Copping, L.G. and J.J. Menn, 2000. Biopesticides. A review of their action application and efficacy. Pest Manage. Sci., 56: 651-676.
    Direct Link    


  • Debnath, N., S. Das, D. Seth, R. Chandra, S.C. Bhattacharya and A. Goswami, 2011. Entomotoxic effect of silica nanoparticles against Sitophilus oryzae (L.). J. Pest Sci., 84: 99-105.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Golob, P., 1997. Current status and future perspectives for inert dusts for control of stored product insects. J. Stored Prod. Res., 33: 69-79.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Barik, T.K., B. Sahu and V. Swain, 2008. Nanosilica-from medicine to pest control. Parasitol. Res., Vol. 103.
    CrossRef    


  • Kumar, R.S.S., P.J. Shiny, C.H. Anjali, J. Jerobin and K.M. Goshen et al., 2013. Distinctive effects of nano-sized permethrin in the environment. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 20: 2593-2602.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Routray, S., D. Dey, S. Baral, A.P. Das and V. Patil, 2016. Potential of nanotechnology in insect pest control. Progressive Res. Int. J., 11: 903-906.


  • El Wakeil, N., S. Alkahtani and N. Gaafar, 2017. Is Nanotechnology a Promising Field for Insect Pest Control in IPM Programs? In: New Pesticides and Soil Sensors, Grumezescu, A.M. (Ed.). Chapter 7, Academic Press, New York, USA., ISBN: 978-0-12-804299-1, pp: 273-309
    Direct Link    


  • Gohil, J.M., A. Bhattacharya and P. Ray, 2006. Studies on the crosslinking of poly (vinyl alcohol). J. Polym. Res., 13: 161-169.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kitherian, S., 2017. Nano and bio-nanoparticles for insect control. Res. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 7: 1-9.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Keeping, M.G. and O.L. Kvedaras, 2008. Silicon as a plant defence against insect herbivory: Response to Massey, Ennos and Hartley. J. Anim. Ecol., 77: 631-633.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zahir, A.A., A. Bagavan, C. Kamaraj, G. Elango and A.A. Rahuman, 2012. Efficacy of plant-mediated synthesized silver nanoparticles against Sitophilus oryzae. J. Biopest., 5: 95-102.
    Direct Link    


  • Nowack, B., 2009. Is anything out there?: What life cycle perspectives of nano-products can tell us about nanoparticles in the environment. Nano Today, 4: 11-12.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yousef D.A., A.E. Bayoumi, N.Z. Dimetry, A.H. Amin and E.M. Hoballah, 2019. Evaluation of peppermint oil and its nano-formulations and their effects on bionomics and enzymatic activies against Spodoptera littoralies. J. Union Arab Uni., (in Press)


  • Kim, G.Y., J. Shim, M.S. Kang and S.H. Moon, 2008. Preparation of a highly sensitive enzyme electrode using gold nanoparticles for measurement of pesticides at the ppt level. J. Environ. Monit., 10: 632-637.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Owolade, O. and D. Ogunleti, 2008. Effects of titanium dioxide on the diseases, development and yield of edible cowpea. J. Plant Prot. Res., 48: 329-336.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gajbhiye, M., J. Kesharwani, A. Ingle, A. Gade and M. Rai, 2009. Fungus-mediated synthesis of silver nanoparticles and their activity against pathogenic fungi in combination with fluconazole. Nanomed.: Nanotechnol. Biol. Med., 5: 382-386.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Ibrahim, I.A.M., A.A.F. Zikry and M.A. Sharaf, 2010. Preparation of spherical silica nanoparticles: Stober silica. J. Am. Sci., 6: 985-989.
    Direct Link    


  • Vani, C. and U. Brindhaa, 2013. Silica nanoparticles as nanocides against Corcyra cephalonica (S.), the stored grain pest. Int. J. Pharma Bio Sci., 4: 1108-1118.


  • Molpeceres, J., M.R. Aberturas and M. Guzman, 2000. Biodegradable nanoparticles as a delivery system for cyclosporine: Preparation and characterization. J. Microencapsul., 17: 599-614.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lin, P.C., S. Lin, P.C. Wang and R. Sridhar, 2014. Techniques for physicochemical characterization of nanomaterials. Biotechnol. Adv., 32: 711-726.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ubrich, N., P. Bouillot, C. Pellerin, M. Hoffman and P. Maincent, 2004. Preparation and characterization of propranolol hydrochloride nanoparticles: a comparative study. J. Controlled Release, 97: 291-300.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rahman, I.A., P. Vejayakumaran, C.S. Sipaut, J. Ismail, M. Abu Bakar, R. Adnan and C.K. Chee, 2007. An optimized sol-gel synthesis of stable primary equivalent silica particles. Colloids Surf. A. Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 294: 102-110.


  • Wang, L., X. Li, G. Zhang, J. Dong and J. Eastoe, 2007. Eastoe, Oil-in-water nanoemulsions for pesticide formulations. J. Colloid Interf. Sci., 314: 230-235.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Niemeyer, C.M. and P. Doz, 2001. Nanoparticles, proteins and nucleic acids: Biotechnology meets materials science. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 40: 4128-4158.
    Direct Link    


  • Sahayaraj, K., M. Madasamy and S.A. Radhika, 2016. Insecticidal activity of bio-silver and gold nanoparticles against Pericallia ricini Fab. (Lepidaptera: Archidae). J. Biopestic., 9: 63-72.
    Direct Link    


  • Guan, H., D. Chi, J. Yu and X. Li, 2008. A novel photodegradable insecticide: Preparation, characterization and properties evaluation of nano-imidacloprid. Pesticide Biochem. Physiol., 92: 83-91.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Debnath, N., S. Das, P. Patra, S. Mitra and A. Goswami, 2012. Toxicological evaluation of entomotoxic silica nanoparticle. Toxicol. Environ. Chem., 94: 944-951.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yang, F.L., X.G. Li, F. Zhu and C.L. Lei, 2009. Structural characterization of nanoparticles loaded with garlic essential oil and their insecticidal activity against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Agric. Food Chem., 57: 10156-10162.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zibaee, I., H.M. Farahani, J.M. Razi and M.N. Moghaddam, 2016. Comparison of nanopellets formulation with phostoxin against five important pests of stored products. J. Entomol. Zool. Stud., 4: 80-85.
    Direct Link    


  • Tripathi, A., N. Chandrasekaran, A.M. Raichur and A. Mukherjee, 2009. Antibacterial applications of silver nanoparticles synthesized by aqueous extract of Azadirachta indica (Neem) leaves. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol., 5: 93-98.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Vivekanandhan, S., M. Misra and A.K. Mohanty, 2009. Biological synthesis of silver nanoparticles using Glycine max (soybean) leaf extract: An investigation on different soybean varieties. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol., 9: 6828-6833.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Begum, N.A., S. Mondal, S. Basu, R.A. Laskar and D. Mandal, 2009. Biogenic synthesis of Au and Ag nanoparticles using aqueous solutions of black tea leaf extracts. Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces, 71: 113-118.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kumar, J.A., T. Rekha, S.S. Devi, M. Kannan, A. Jaswanth and V. Gopal, 2010. Insecticidal activity of ethanolic extract of leaves of Annona squamosa. J. Chem. Pharm. Res., 2: 177-180.
    Direct Link    


  • Stadler, T., M. Buteler and D.K. Weaver, 2010. Novel use of nanostructured alumina as an insecticide. Pest Manage. Sci., 66: 577-579.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Keratum, A.Y., R.B. Abo Arab, A.A. Ismail and G.M. Nasr, 2015. Impact of nanoparticle zinc oxide and aluminum oxide against rice weevil Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) under laboratory conditions. Egypt J. Plant Pro. Res., 3: 30-38.


  • Sabbour, M.M., 2012. Entomotoxicity assay of two nanoparticle materials 1-(Al2O3 and TiO2) against Sitophilus oryzae under laboratory and store conditions in Egypt. J. Novel Applied Sci., 1: 103-108.
    Direct Link    


  • Sabbour, M.M., 2013. Entomotoxicity assay of nano-particle 3-(Zinc oxide ZnO) against Sitophilus oryzae under laboratory and store conditions in Egypt. Scient. Res. Rep., 1: 51-57.


  • Salem, A.A., A.M. Hamzah and N.M. El-Taweelah, 2015. Aluminum and zinc oxides nanoparticles as a new method for controlling Tribolium castaneum compared to malathion insecticides. J. Plant Prot. Path. Mansoura Univ., 6: 129-137.
    Direct Link    


  • Goswami, A., I. Roy, S. Sengupta and N. Debnath, 2010. Novel applications of solid and liquid formulations of nanoparticles against insect pests and pathogens. Thin Solid Films, 519: 1252-1257.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Abo-Arab, R.B., M.H. Amal and A.S. Hashem, 2014. Comparative bioactivity of aluminum oxide (Al2O3), titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles and malathion on Sitophilus oryzae L. and Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.). Global J. Agric. Food Saf. Sci., 1: 25-37.
    Direct Link    


  • Ziaee, M. and A. Khashaveh, 2007. Effect of Five Diatomaceous Earth Formulations Against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae), Oryzaephilus surinamensis (Coleoptera: Silvanidae) and Rhyzopertha dominica (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae). Insect Sci., 14: 359-365.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mohitazar, G., M. Safaralizadeh, A. Pourmirza and M. Azimi, 2009. Studies on the efficacy of silicosec against Oryzaephilus surinamensis L. and Tribolium castaneum herbst using two bioassay methods. J. Plant Prot. Res., 49: 330-334.


  • Vayias, B.J., C.G. Athanassiou, Z. Korunic and V. Rozman, 2009. Evaluation of natural diatomaceous earth deposits from south‐eastern Europe for stored‐grain protection: the effect of particle size. Pest Manage. Sci. Form. Pestic. Sci., 65: 1118-1123.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ziaee, M. and S. Moharramipour, 2012. Efficacy of Iranian diatomaceous earth deposits against Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). J. Asia-Pac. Entomol., 15: 547-553.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Popat, A., J. Liu, Q. Hu, M. Kennedy, B. Peters, G.Q.M. Lu and S.Z. Qiao, 2012. Adsorption and release of biocides with mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Nanoscale, 4: 970-975.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Korunic, Z., 1998. Review Diatomaceous earths, a group of natural insecticides. J. Stored Prod. Res., 34: 87-97.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Athanassiou, C.G., N.G. Kavallieratos and N.S. Andris, 2004. Insecticidal effect of three diatomaceous earth formulations against adults of Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and Tribolium confusum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) on oat, rye and triticale. J. Econ. Entomol., 97: 2160-2167.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sabbour, M.M. and S. El-Sayed, Abd-El-Aziz, 2015. Efficacy of some nano-diatomaceous earths against red flour beetle tribolium castaneum and confused flour beetle, tribolium confusum (coleoptera: tenebrionidae) under laboratory and store conditions. Bull. Environ. Pharmacol. Life Sci., 4: 54-59.


  • Ziaee, M., 2015. Influence of grain type on the susceptibility of Tribolium confusum adults to three diatomaceous earth formulations. J. Crop Prot., 4: 113-119.
    Direct Link    


  • Ziaee, M. and Z. Ganji, 2016. Insecticidal efficacy of silica nanoparticles against Rhyzopertha dominica F. and Tribolium confusum Jacquelin du Val. J. Plant Prot. Res., 56: 250-256.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ragaei, M. and A.H. Sabry, 2014. Nanotechnology for insect pest control. Int. J. Sci. Environ. Technol., 3: 528-545.
    Direct Link    


  • Ulrichs, C., I. Mewis and A. Goswami, 2005. Crop diversification aiming nutritional security in West Bengal: biotechnology of stinging capsules in nature's water-blooms. Ann. Tech. Issue of State Agri. Technologists Service Assoc. pp: 1-18


  • Ulrichs, Ch., I. Mewis, A. Goswami, S.D. Chatterjee, S.P. Banerjee, S. Adhikary and A. Bhattacharyya, 2006. Biodiversity-macro and micro: To be nano or not to be. Everymans Sci., 40: 433-436.


  • Ulrichs, C., S. Entenmann, A. Goswami and I. Mewis, 2006. Abrasive und hydrophil/lipophile Effekte unterschiedlicher inerter Stäube im Einsatz gegen Schadinsekten am Beispiel des Kornkäfers Sitophilus granarius L. Gesunde Pflanzen, 58: 173-181.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ulrichs, Ch., F. Krause, T. Rocksch, A. Goswami and I. Mewis, 2006. Electrostatic application of inert silica dust based insecticides to plant surfaces. Comm. Applied Biol. Sci., Ghent Univ., 71: 171-178.
    Direct Link    


  • Ulrichs, C., A. Goswami and I. Mewis, 2007. Nano-structured silica-physical active pesticides for urban settings. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Plant Protection and Plant Health in Europe, May 10–12, 2007, DPG-BCPC, Berlin, -.


  • Lawry, J.V., 2001. Insects separate diffusing particles in parallel. Nanotech Model Simul Microsyst, 1: 254-257.
    Direct Link    


  • Arumugam, G., V. Velayutham, S. Shanmugavel and J. Sundaram, 2016. Efficacy of nanostructured silica as a stored pulse protector against the infestation of bruchid beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Applied Nanosci., 6: 445-450.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rahman, A., D. Seth, S.K. Mukhopadhyaya, R.L. Brahmachary, Ch. Ulrichs and A. Goswami, 2009. Surface functionalized amorphous nanosilica and microsilica with nanopores as promising tools in biomedicine. Naturwissenschaften, 96: 31-38.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ki, H.Y., J.H. Kim, S.C. Kwon and S.H. Jeong, 2007. A study on multifunctional wool textiles treated with nano-sized silver. J. Mater. Sci., 42: 8020-8024.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vidhyalakshmi, R., R. Bhakyaraj and R.S. Subhasree, 2009. Encapsulation “The future of probiotics”-A review. Adv. Biol. Res., 3: 96-103.
    Direct Link    


  • Ding, W.K. and N.P. Shah, 2009. Effect of various encapsulating materials on the stability of probiotic bacteria. J. Food Sci., 74: M100-M107.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Patil, S.A., 2009. Economics of Agri Poverty: Nano-Bio Solutions. Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, Indian.


  • Sukul, N.C., R.K Singh, S. Sukul, P. Sen, A. Bhattacharyya, A. Sukul and R. Chakrabarty, 2008. Potentized drugs enhance growth of Pigeon Pea. Environ. Ecol., 26: 1115-1118.
    Direct Link    


  • Bhattacharyya, A., M. Gosh, K.P. Chinnaswamy, P. Sen, B. Barik, P. Kundu and S. Mandal, 2008. Nano-Particle (Allelochemicals) and Silkworm Physiology. In: Recent Trends in Seribiotechnology, Chinnaswamy, K.P. and R.A. Vijaya Bhaskar (Eds.). Sri Krishnadevaraya University, Bangalore, India, pp: 58-63


  • Bhattacharyya, A., 2009. Nanoparticles-from drug delivery to insect pest control. Akshar, 1: 1-7.


  • Bhattacharyya, A., A. Bhaumik, P.U. Rani, S. Mandals and T.T. Epidi, 2010. Nano-particles-a recent approach to insect pest control. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 9: 3489-3493.
    Direct Link    


  • Paranagama, P.A., K.H.T. Abeysekera, K. Abeywickrama and L. Nugaliyadde, 2003. Fungicidal and anti-aflatoxigenic effects of the essential oil of Cymbopogon citratus (DC.) Stapf. (lemongrass) against Aspergillus flavus Link. isolated from stored rice. Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 37: 86-90.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Rana, S.V.S. and Y. Verma, 2005. Biochemical toxicity of benzene. J. Env. Biol., 26: 157-168.
    Direct Link    


  • Korunić, Z. and V. Rozman, 2012. Botanical insecticides. Proceedings of the 24th Sci and Educat Seminar DDD and ZUPP 2012 Disinfection, Disinfestation and Deratization and Protection of Stored Agricultural Products, March 20-23, 2012, Split, Croatia, pp: 269-280.


  • Rozman, V., Z. Korunić, J. Halamić, A. Liška, R. Baličević, I. Galović and P. Lucić, 2015. Development of new natural insecticide formulations based on inert dusts and botanicals to replace synthetic, conventional insecticides. Proceedings of the 27th Sci and Educational Seminar DDD and ZUPP 2015 Disinfestation and Deratization and Protection of Stored Agricultural Products, March 24-27, 2015, Croatia, pp: 197-201.


  • Arnason, J.T., S.R. Sims and I.M. Scott, 2012. Natural products from plants as insecticides. In: Phytoc-hemistry and Pharmacognosy, Pezzuto, J.M. and M. Kato (Eds.). Oxford, UK,
    Direct Link    


  • Kienzler, A., S.K. Bopp, S. van der Linden, E. Berggren and A. Worth, 2016. Regulatory assessment of chemical mixtures: Requirements, current approaches and future perspectives. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm., 80: 321-334.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dimetry, N.Z., H.Z. Zidan, R.R. Iss-Hak and H.M. Hussein, 1994. Biological and insecticidal activities of Neem seed extract on the Rose Scarabaeid beetle Tropinota squalid Scop. 5th Conf. Agric. Dev. Res. Fac. Agric., 2: 945-956.


  • Dimetry, N.Z. and H.M. Hussein, 2016. Role of nanotechnology in agriculture with special reference to pest control. Int. J. Pharm Tech. Res., 9: 121-144.


  • Nenaah, G.E., S.I. Ibrahim and B.A. Al-Assiuty, 2015. Chemical composition, insecticidal activity and persistence of three asteraceae essential oils and their nanoemulsions against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). J. Stored Prod. Res., 61: 9-16.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved