HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Trends in Applied Sciences Research

Year: 2011 | Volume: 6 | Issue: 8 | Page No.: 782-793
DOI: 10.17311/tasr.2011.782.793
Cytoskeleton Analysis as Target for Bioactives
Swarnlata Saraf, Dhani Ram Patel, Chanchal Deep Kaur and Shailendra Saraf

Abstract: Cytoskeletons are the proteins contained within the cytoplasm and responsible for many cellular and physiopathological events such as maintenance of cell shape, chromosome aggregation, mechanical support to cells, muscle contraction, provide mechanical strength etc. Cytoskeletons are of three major types: Microfilaments, intermediate filaments and microtubules. They are collectively responsible for providing most of the structure and spatial organization in the cell. In this review, we focus on the drugs, bioactive and other active agents which act on the cytoskeletal elements and also emphasize on the method used to visualize or analyze the cytoskeleton structures and elements. Different classes of cytoskeleton acting drugs, agents, their importance, target area and their mode of action are also focused in this review with the contribution of the different instruments for the analysis of cytoskeleton types which are important for the drug targeting.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Swarnlata Saraf, Dhani Ram Patel, Chanchal Deep Kaur and Shailendra Saraf, 2011. Cytoskeleton Analysis as Target for Bioactives. Trends in Applied Sciences Research, 6: 782-793.

Keywords: intermediate filaments, microfilaments, cytoplasm, Cytoskeleton, microtubules and bioactives

INTRODUCTION

The cytoskeleton is cellular supporting framework or skeleton contained within the cytoplasm and is mainly consisted of proteins. This dynamic structure control the cell shape, protects the cell, enables cellular motion and plays important roles in both intracellular transport (the movement of vesicles and organelles) and cellular division (Janmey, 1995; Ramaekers and Bosman, 2004). highly complex. Cytoskeletons are flexible and dynamic structure involved in a variety of cellular functions essential for cell survival including motility, maintenance of cell shape, cell attachment and interaction with the extracellular matrix (i.e., through focal adhesions) anchorage of cell organelles and maintenance of cytoplasmic viscosity. The cytoskeleton is composed of three types of cytosolic fibers: Microfilaments, intermediate filaments and microtubules and arranged in a complex network (Woll et al., 2005).

Analysis of the various cytoskeletons and cytoskeleton proteins play very important role on the drug targeting. Different types of analytical instruments are used for the analysis of cytoskeleton elements and their role on the different function and diseases. Commonly used instrument for cytoskeleton analysis are flow cytometry (Woll et al., 2005; Nebe et al., 1997), indirect immunofluoroscence (Marcum et al., 1978), electron microscopy (Small et al., 1999), tubuline assembly assay (Himes et al., 1976; Grosios et al., 1999), sedimentation assay (Combeau et al., 2000), confocal microscopy (Dailey et al., 2006; Claxton et al., 2006), fluorescent spectrophotometer (Damania et al., 2010; Sattelle, 1988), competitive binding assay (Hadfield et al., 2003), cytoblot assay (Chiosis and Keeton, 2009) and mass spectrometric analysis (Sakamoto et al., 2008) which are very useful in the determination of action of drugs and also helpful to observation of cellular and structural changes.

As a major, ubiquitous protein in all metazoan cells, actin serves central roles in shape determination, cytokinesis and cell motility, as well as in the establishment of cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions (Da Costa et al., 2003). A notable property of living cells is their ability to regionally control the polymerization and supramolecular organization of actin filaments, involving the engagement of a broad spectrum of actin binding proteins and resulting in the formation of different structural sub compartments, each with a defined function. In epithelial cells, a circumferential band of actin filaments provides the structural support for cell-cell junctions; in motile cells, such as leukocytes, actin filaments form the meshed framework of the protruding lamellipodia and linear filopodia and immobile fibroblasts are anchored flat to the underlying matrix via Trans membrane coupling to linear bundles of actin filaments, or stress fibers. In response to external signals, dramatic changes in cell shape and motility can be effected and all involve the controlled and dynamic reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton (Amos and Amos, 1991).

The interplay between the three-dimensional protein network called the cytoskeleton and the two-dimensional lipid bilayer which forms the cell membrane is a central feature of cell biology and a richly complex physical and chemical phenomenon. The complexity of the membrane/cytoskeleton boundary derives in part from the intricacy of the interface between two soft materials and in part from the number of distinct molecules and chemical interactions that occur at this interface and influence its physical properties and chemical composition. The importance of the field and the volume of contributions to it have motivated many reviews (Small et al., 1999).

The cytoskeleton spans the cytoplasm and interconnects the cell nucleus with the extracellular matrix, thereby forming a structural link between molecules involved in cell communication on the one hand and gene expression on the other (Erickson, 2007; Frixione, 2000). Since the cytoskeleton is involved in virtually all cellular processes, abnormalities in this essential cellular component frequently result in disease. In this introduction, the basic structure of the cytoskeleton is briefly outlined. Furthermore, the disease processes in which the cytoskeleton plays a decisive role (Luna and Hitt, 1992; Janmey, 1995). Sako et al. (2010) measured directly through the technique of micromanipulation by micropipette the viscosity of mouse muscle cells modified by transfection with the αβ-crystalline in order to highlight the role played by the changes in the cytoskeleton. Two vectors were used, the αβ-crystalline of wild type and R129G αβ-crystalline mutant. (Sako et al., 2010).

COMPOSITION OF CYTOSKELETONS

In the diversity of interactions occur between membrane constituents and all three components of the cytoskeleton. The binding of the major cytoskeleton fiber proteins themselves (except for some intermediate filaments) to phospholipids appears generally to be relatively weak and transient (Resch et al., 2002). Linking of cytoskeletal filaments with directly to the lipid bilayer, intact cells assemble complexes of various proteins at points where the cytoskeleton attaches to the membrane. Some components in these linkages span the lipid bilayer, some penetrate into the cytoplasmic face of the bilayer, some bind preferentially to specific phospholipid head groups and others bind cytoskeletal filaments either directly to the lipid bilayer or indirectly to proteins bound to the membrane (Magin et al., 2004). Types of cytoskeletons include: Microfilaments, Microtubules and Intermediate filaments. Comparison of various types of cytoskeletons have been shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Comparison of cytoskeleton types

Microfilaments
Composition:
Actin filaments are globular protein and Globular monomer (G-actin) polymerizes into Filamentous (F-) actin which appears two right-handed helices wound around each other with a repeat distance of approximately 36 nm. Actin network plays an important role is the separation of centrosomes and thus very important for the drug which act during the cell cycle. Actin filaments with the microtubule and intermediate filament contributing to the morphological framework of a cell and which participates in the dynamic regulation of cellular functions (Heng and Koh, 2010).

Actin filaments have a diameter of 7 nm and can reach lengths of 30-100 μm in vitro and at least several microns in vivo. Because these filaments are so long, they form semi-dilute solutions at extremely low volume fraction (<0.05%) in which rotational diffusion of the filaments is greatly retarded due to solute-solute interactions. Nearly all mechanically relevant properties of actin filaments-length, stiffness, concentration, lateral or orthogonal aggregation can be regulated by one or more of scores of actin binding proteins found in the cytoplasm of most cells (Magin et al., 2004; Schaub et al, 2007).

Functions:

Regulation of actin cytoskeletal organization may have a crucial role in signaling lens cell differentiation (Bijman et al., 2008)
Actin bundles support projections of cell membrane (Lambrechts et al., 2004)
Change of shape of platelets during blood clotting (Lambrechts et al., 2004)
Actin polymerization act important role in toxins action (Small et al., 1999)
Give mechanical support to cells and hardwire the cytoplasm with the surroundings to support signal transduction (Svitkina et al., 2007)
In muscle cells, to be the scaffold on which myosin proteins generate force to support muscle contraction (Wöll et al., 2005)
In non-muscle cells, to be a track for cargo transport myosins (non-conventional myosins) such as myosin V and VI. Non-conventional myosins use ATP hydrolysis to transport cargo, such as vesicles and organelles, in a directed fashion much faster than diffusion (Heng and Koh, 2010)

Microtubules
Composition: Microtubules are composed of α/β tubulin heterodimers units which are polymerized to form hollow cylinders the length of cylinder is approximately 25 nm diameters which can be more than 100 μm long. The walls of the microtubule are composed of 5 mm diameter linear proto filaments arranged in parallel. Like actin, the tubulin subunits bind nucleoside triphosphates and hydrolyze them after they polymerize. Unlike actin which binds most purine nucleotides, tubulin binds GTP rather than ATP (Hemphill et al., 1992) microtubule form intracellular lattice like structure which is reorganized into the mitotic spindle (Risinger et al., 2009).

Functions:

Microtubules act as conveyer belts inside cells (Jordan and Wilson, 2004)
They help to move vesicles, granules and organelles like mitochondria and chromosomes via special attachment proteins (Combeau et al., 2000)
Microtubules also play a role in maintaining the cytoskeleton, that is, the basic structure of the cell because, structurally, they are linear polymers of tubulin which is a globular protein present in the cytoplasm (Tian et al., 2010)
During non cell division, it organizes the cytoplasm, position of nucleus and organelles (Marcum et al., 1978; Himes et al., 1976)
Microtubule provides shape and strength of cytoplasm (Hait et al., 2007)

Intermediate filaments
Composition:
Intermediate Filaments (IFs) are thicker as compared to microfilaments and where as they are thinner than microtubules thus they are known as intermediate in them with respect to size (Godsel et al., 2008). They have approximately 10 nm in diameter and length in microns, in cells often ranging from the plasma membrane to the nucleus (Parry et al., 2007). They are responsible for the viscoelastic networks at low protein concentration in vitro and thus can be believe for provide mechanical strength to the cell in vivo. Intermediate filaments differ from microfilaments and microtubules in several respects (Herrmann et al., 2007). Unlike actin and tubulin which have only a few closely related isoform in the same species and are very strongly conserved in evolution, intermediate filaments are formed from polymers of proteins which varies according to cell types of the same species and between different species (Kreplak et al., 2005). The nature of intermediate filament proteins can be either acidic or basic. They may be present or may not be present in the cell. There are various unicellular eukaryotic cells which have the actin and tubuline filaments but lack of the intermediate filaments (Godsel et al., 2008). Intermediate filaments are very important for living cells and it is essential for the cell structure and function because they provide mechanical support and physical resilience for cells and tissue (Kim and Coulombe, 2007).

Functions

Provide mechanical strength (Kim and Coulombe, 2007)
Into the cytoplasm where they provide a scaffold for mitochondria, the Golgi complex, Microtubule Organizing Centers (MTOCs) and other cytoskeletal elements (Herrmann et al., 2007)
In the periphery IFs associate with plasma membrane specializations such as desmosomes, hemidesmosomes and focal adhesions (Godsel et al., 2008)
Play important role in cell signaling, growth, epithelial polarity, wound healing and apoptosis in addition to providing the cell with resilience to environmental stress (Parry et al., 2007; Goldie et al., 2007)
IFs contribute the tensile strength necessary for maintaining cell integrity (Kreplak and Fudge, 2007)

THE MICROTUBULE NETWORK AS A TARGET FOR THERAPEUTIC AGENTS Microtubules are the dynamic structure that are involved in various cellular processes, cell division, cell cycle and cell proliferation. They are crucial in the development and maintenance of cell shape, in the transport of vesicles, mitochondria and other components throughout cells, in cell signaling and in cell division and mitosis. Agents or drugs which are act on the microtubules or tubuline subunits are affect all the above described cellular processes and thus they have very useful in the treatment of cancer therapy. Microtubules and their dynamics are the targets of a chemically diverse group of antimitotic drugs. Drugs and agents which are targeting into the microtubules are dividing into two classes first which are inhibit tubulin polymerization and second which are promote tubuline polymerization. Different tubuline targeting agents are summarized into the Table 2 and the importance of microtubules in drug targeting is summarized in the Fig. 1 (Rovini et al., 2011; Risinger et al., 2009). The polymerization of microtubules occurs by a nucleation elongation mechanism in which the relatively slow formation of a short microtubule nucleus is followed by rapid elongation of the microtubule at its ends by the reversible, non-covalent addition of tubulin dimmers (Hadfield et al., 2003).

Actin-targeted drugs: Actin microfilament is globular protein in which the G-actin monomers are polymerizes into filamentous network. Actin cytoskeleton involved in various type of cellular function such as cell movement, muscle contraction etc. A variety of drugs and toxins have been act on to the actin cytoskeleton and also they have been used to investigate the cellular role of actin. Generally the drugs and toxins which act with actin cytoskeleton may stabilize, depolymerize, polymerizes or rearrangement of F-actin filaments which are responsible for the changes of cellular function and other structural modification and thus actin are play important role on the drug targeting (Lambrechts et al., 2004). Actin targeted drug are divided into three major classes includes cytochalasins, latrunculins and jasplakinolides. Actin targeted drugs are summarized in the Table 3.

Fig. 1: Summary of importance of microtubule on drug targeting

Table 2: Agents which interact with microtubules

Table 3: Agents which interact with actin

Novel drug delivery systems for targeting to cytoskeleton: Cytoskeleton is dynamic structure, that controls the cell shape and involve many cellular function and cell division. The use of novel controlled delivery systems could be very helpful for the targeting of cytoskeletons (Khan, 2001) (Table 4). Different carrier system like liquid crystals (e.g., niosome, cubosome), lipid based systems (e.g., liposphere, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanocore technology), colloidosomes and nanoparticles owing to their properties could be applicable for targeting the drugs and bioactives into the cytoskeleton elements (Rawat et al., 2008a, b; Saraf et al., 2011; Rawat et al., 2006).

Table 4: Analysis technique and their target area

Various agents which act into the cytoskeleton have low water solubility like paclitaxel, cytochalasin etc. and the lipid based system (liposphere, solid lipid nanoparticle, nanocore technology) (Rawat et al., 2008b; Rawat and Saraf, 2008) is one of the most promising carrier for that type of agent because they provide better entrapement and stability to the low water soluble drugs (Rawat et al., 2008a). Nanosuspension and nanocapsules are stable systems for controlled delivery of poorly water soluble drugs (Rad, 2010; Rawat et al., 2006). Liquid crystal has been useful for the lipid soluble as well as water soluble drugs (Garg et al., 2007). Nanoshells coated with gold system are very beneficial for the tumor targeting and thus it is useful for microtubule targeting. Controlled and targeted delivery is one of the most enviable requirement from a carrier which involves multidisciplinary site specific or targeted approach may be helpful to targeting the agent into actin filament microtubule and intermediate filaments.

CONCLUSION

The cytoskeleton may serve as a scaffold for the assembly of receptors and signaling molecules to realize specific intracellular signal-transduction pathways. Therefore, appropriate methods are necessary to determine conditions that induce the anchorage of receptors and intracellular signaling proteins to the cytoskeleton and different methods are helpful in determining the role of cytoskeleton in drug targeting. The conformational dynamics of cytoskeleton and the effects of different factors have been discussed. Considering the rich variety of cytoskeleton functions and the large amount of data accumulated in these studies some of the couplings between the structural changes of cytoskeleton and drug targeting were revealed. In many other cases the complete understanding of the roles of cytoskeleton for drug targeting is further studied. Recent advances in the development of novel technologies open the possibility to study the conformational dynamics of cytoskeleton in specific cellular structures associated to diverse regulatory proteins despite the different hypotheses about the exact role of cytoskeleton in drug targeting. Different analysis techniques were helpful to determine the role of cytoskeleton in drug targeting and helpful to analyze the role of cytoskeletal element in cellular and physio-pathological processes.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

One of the author wishes to thank University Grants Commission (UGC), (Major Research project, F. No. 39-170/2010 (SR), New Delhi for financial support and Director, University Institute of Pharmacy, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University, Raipur for providing laboratory, instrument and all other facilities required for this work.

REFERENCES

  • Amos, L.A. and W.B. Amos, 1991. Molecules of the Cytoskeleton. Vol. 3 Macmillan, London, pp: 42-55


  • Hemphill, A., M. Affolter and T. Seebeck, 1992. A novel microtubule-binding motif identified ina high molecular weight microtubule-associated Protein from Trypanosoma brucei. J. Cell Biol., 117: 95-103.
    PubMed    


  • Lambrechts, A., M.V. Troys and C. Ampe, 2004. The actin cytoskeleton in normal and pathological cell motility. Int. J. Biochem. C. Bio., 36: 1890-1909.
    CrossRef    


  • Attard, G., A. Greystoke, S. Kaye and J.D. Bono, 2006. Update on tubulin-binding agents. Pathol. Biol., 54: 72-84.


  • Babu, B., M. Lee, L. Lee, R. Strobel and O. Brockway et al., 2011. Acetyl analogs of combretastatin a-4: Synthesis and biological studies. Bioorgan. Med. Chem., 19: 2359-2367.
    CrossRef    


  • Nebe, B., W. Bohn, H. Pommerenke and J. Rychly, 1997. Flow cytometric detection of the association between cell surface receptors and the cytoskeleton. Cytometry, 28: 66-73.
    PubMed    


  • Claxton, N.S., T.J. Fellers and M.W. Davidson, 2006. Laser scanning confocal microscopy, Department of Optical Microscopy and Digital Imaging, National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, The Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310. http://www.olympusfluoview.com/theory/LSCMIntro.pdf.


  • Combeau, C., J. Provost, F. Lancelin, Y. Tournoux and F. Prod'homme et al., 2000. RPR112378 and RPR115781: two representatives of a new family of microtubule assembly inhibitors. Mol. Pharmacol., 57: 553-563.
    PubMed    


  • Dailey, M.E., E. Manders, D.R. Soll and M. Terasaki, 2006. Confocal Microscopy of Living Cells. In: Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, Pawley, J.B. (Ed.). Springer Science Business Media, New York, pp: 381-403


  • Damania, D., H. Subramanian, A.K. Tiwari, Y. Stypula and D. Kunte et al., 2010. Role of cytoskeleton in controlling the disorder strength of cellular nanoscale architecture. Biophys. J., 99: 989-996.
    PubMed    


  • Elstad, N.L. and K.D. Fowers, 2009. OncoGel (ReGel/paclitaxel)-clinical applications for a novel paclitaxel delivery system. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev., 61: 785-794.
    CrossRef    


  • Ramaekers, F.C.S. and F.T. Bosman, 2004. The cytoskeleton and disease. Pathol. Soc. Great Br. Ireland. J. Pathol., 204: 351-354.
    Direct Link    


  • Frixione, E., 2000. Recurring views on the structure and function of the cytoskeleton: A 300-year epic. Cell Motil. Cytoskel., 46: 73-94.
    CrossRef    


  • Chiosis, G. and A.B. Keeton, 2009. Assay for isolation of inhibitors of Her2-Kinase expression method. Mol. Biol., 486: 139-149.
    CrossRef    


  • Garg, G., S. Saraf and S. Saraf, 2007. Cubosomes: An Overview. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 30: 350-353.


  • Grosios, K., S.E. Holwell, A.T. McGown, G.R. Pettit and M.C. Bibby, 1999. In vivo and in vitro evaluation of combretastatin A-4 and its sodium phosphate prodrug. Br. J. Cancer, 81: 1318-1327.
    CrossRef    


  • Resch, G.P., K.N. Goldie, A. Krebs, A. Hoenger and J.V. Small, 2002. Visualization of the actin cytoskeleton by cryoelectron microscopy. J. Cell Sci., 115: 1877-1882.
    Direct Link    


  • Hait, W.N., E. Rubina, E. Alli and S. Goodin, 2007. Tubulin targeting agents. Update Cancer Ther., 2: 1-18.
    CrossRef    


  • Erickson, H.P., 2007. Evolution of the cytoskeleton. Bioessays, 29: 668-677.
    PubMed    


  • Hayduk, E.J. and K.H. Lee, 2005. Cytochalasin D can improve heterologous protein productivity in adherent chinese hamster ovary cells. Bio. Tech. Bio. Eng., 90: 354-364.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Herrmann, H., H. Bar, L. Kreplak, S.V. Strelkov and U. Aebi, 2007. Intermediate filaments: From cell architecture to nanomechanics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 8: 562-573.
    Direct Link    


  • Janmey, P., 1995. Cell Membranes and the Cytoskeleton. In: Handbook of Biological Physics, Lipowsky, R. and E. Sackmann (Eds.). Vol. 1, Elsevier Science B.V., New York


  • Hadfield, J.A., S. Ducki, N. Hirst and A.T. McGown, 2003. Tubulin and microtubules as targets for anticancer drugs. Progress Cell Cycle Res., 5: 309-325.
    PubMed    


  • Johnson, R.M., G. Taylor and D.B. Meyer, 1980. Shape and volume changes in erythrocyte ghosts and spectrin-actin networks. J. Cell Biol., 86: 371-376.
    CrossRef    


  • Goldie, K.N., T. Wedig, A.K. Mitra, U. Aebi, H. Herrmann and A. Hoenger, 2007. Dissecting the 3-D structure of vimentin intermediate filaments by cryo-electron tomography. J. Structur. Biol., 158: 378-385.
    CrossRef    


  • Khan, G.M., 2001. Controlled release oral dosage forms: Some recent advances in the matrix type drug delivery systems. J. Med. Sci., 1: 350-354.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Khanfar, M.A., D.T.A. Youssef and K.A. El-Sayed, 2010. 3D-QSAR studies of latrunculin-based actin polymerization inhibitors using CoMFA and CoMSIA approaches. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 45: 3662-3668.
    CrossRef    


  • Kim, S. and P.A. Coulombe, 2007. Intermediate filament scaffolds fulfill mechanical, organizational and signaling functions in the cytoplasm. Genes. Dev., 21: 1581-1597.
    CrossRef    


  • Kreplak, L. and D. Fudge, 2007. Biomechanical properties of intermediate filaments: From tissues to single filaments and back. Bioessays, 29: 26-35.
    CrossRef    


  • Kreplak, L., H. Bar, J.F. Leterrier, H. Herrmann and U. Aebi, 2005. Exploring the mechanical behavior of single intermediate filaments. J. Mol. Biol., 354: 569-577.
    CrossRef    


  • Kushner, B.H., K. Kramer, S. Modak, K. Yataghene and N.K.V. Cheung, 2011. High-dose cyclophosphamide-irinotecan-vincristine for primary refractory neuroblastoma. Eur. J. Cancer, 47: 84-89.
    Direct Link    


  • Godsel, L.M., R.P. Hobbs and K.J. Green, 2008. Intermediate filament assembly: Dynamics to disease. Trends Cell Biol., 18: 28-37.
    CrossRef    


  • Liu, B., M. Yang, R. Li, Y. Ding, X. Qian, L. Yu and X. Jiang, 2008. The antitumor effect of novel docetaxel-loaded thermosensitive micelles. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 69: 527-534.
    CrossRef    


  • Lobert, S., J.W. Ingram and J.J. Correia, 2007. The thermodynamics of vinca alkaloid-induced tubulin spirals formation. Biophys. Chem., 126: 50-58.
    CrossRef    


  • Luna, E.J. and A.L. Hitt, 1992. Cytoskeleton-plasma membrane interactions. Science, 258: 955-964.
    CrossRef    


  • Bijman, M.N., M.P. van Berkel, G.P. van Nieuw Amerongen and E. Boven, 2008. Interference with actin dynamics is superior to disturbance of microtubule function in the inhibition of human ovarian cancer cell motility. Biochem. Pharmacol., 76: 707-716.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Marcum, J.M., J.R. Dedman, B.R. Brinkley and A.R. Means, 1978. Control of microtubule Aassembly-disassembly by calcium-dependent regulator protein. Cell Bio., 75: 3771-3775.
    PubMed    


  • Jordan, M.A. and L. Wilson, 2004. Microtubules as a target for anticancer drugs. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 4: 253-265.
    CrossRef    


  • Tamura, M., M. Kanno and Y. Endo, 2000. Deactivation of neutrophil NADPH oxidase by actin-depolymerizing agents ina cell-free system. Biochem. J., 349: 369-375.
    PubMed    


  • Himes, R.H., P.R. Burton, RN. Kersey and G.B. Pierson, 1976. Brain tubuline polymerization in the absence of microtubuleassociated proteins. Biochemistry, 73: 4397-4399.
    Direct Link    


  • Mugabe, C., R.T. Liggins, D. Guan, I. Manisali and I. Chafeeva et al., 2011. Development and in vitro characterization of paclitaxel and docetaxel loaded into hydrophobically derivatized hyperbranched polyglycerols. Int. J. Pharm., 404: 238-249.
    PubMed    


  • Ozgen, U., Y. Turkoz, M. Stout, F. Ozugurlu and F. Pelik et al., 2003. Degradation of vincristine by myeloperoxidase and hypochlorous acid in children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Leuk. Res., 27: 1109-1113.
    PubMed    


  • Parry, D.A., S.V. Strelkov, P. Burkhard, U. Aebi and H. Herrmann, 2007. Towards a molecular description of intermediate filament structure and assembly. Exp. Cell Res., 313: 2204-2216.
    PubMed    


  • Pereira, D.M., F. Ferreres, J.M. Oliveira, L. Gaspar and J. Faria et al., 2010. Pharmacological effects of Catharanthus roseus root alkaloids in acetylcholinesterase inhibition and cholinergic neurotransmission. Phytomedicine, 17: 646-652.
    PubMed    


  • Rad, A.S., 2010. Study on preparation and some properties of panretin-loaded nanocapsules. Biotechnology, 9: 234-237.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rawat, M. and S. Saraf, 2008. Liposphere: Emerging carriers in the delivery of proteins and peptides. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Nanotechnol., 1: 207-214.
    Direct Link    


  • Rawat, M., D. Singh, S. Saraf and S. Saraf, 2008. Lipid carriers: A versatile delivery vehicle for proteins and peptides. Yakugaku Zasshi, 128: 269-280.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Rawat, M., D. Singh, S. Saraf and S. Saraf, 2008. Development and in vitro evaluation of alginate gel-encapsulated, chitosan-coated ceramic nanocores for oral delivery of enzyme. Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm., 34: 181-188.
    Direct Link    


  • Rawat, M., D. Singh, S. Saraf and S. Saraf, 2006. Nanocarriers: Promising vehicle for bioactive drugs. Biol. Pharm. Bull., 29: 1790-1798.
    CrossRef    


  • Risinger, A.L., Giles F.J. and S.L. Mooberry, 2009. Microtubule dynamics as a target in oncology. Cancer Treat. Rev., 35: 255-261.
    CrossRef    


  • Rovini, A., A. Savry, D. Braguer and M. Carre, 2011. Microtubule-targeted agents: When mitochondria become essential to chemotherapy. Biochim. Biophys. Acta,
    CrossRef    


  • Sako, A., A. Memeledje and P. Assamoi, 2010. Measurement of the viscosity of mousse myoblasts modified with the αβ cristalline through the technique of micromanipulation by the means of micropipette. Asian J. Applied Sciences, 3: 250-261.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sattelle, D.B., 1988. Quasielastic laser light scattering and laser doppler electrophoresis as probes of synaptic and secretory terminal function. J. Exp. Biol., 139: 233-252.
    PubMed    


  • Sattler, J.M., M. Ganter, M. Hliscs, K. Matuschewski and H. Schuler, 2011. Actin regulation in the malaria parasite. Eur. J. Cell Biol.,
    CrossRef    


  • Scott, V.R., R. Boehme and T.R. Matthews, 1988. New class of antifungal agents: Jasplakinolide, a cyclodepsipeptide from the marine sponge, Jaspis species. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother., 32: 1154-1157.
    Direct Link    


  • Da Costa, S.R., C.T. Okamoto and S.F. Hamm-Alvarez, 2003. Actin microfilaments et al.-the many components, effectors and regulators of epithelial cell endocytosis. Adv. Drug Deliver. Rev., 55: 1359-1383.
    PubMed    


  • Small, J., K. Rottner, P. Hahne and K.I. Anderson, 1999. Visualizing the actin cytoskeleton. Microsc. Res. Techniq., 47: 3-17.
    PubMed    


  • Woll, S., R. Windoffer and R.E. Leube, 2005. Dissection of keratin dynamics: Different contributions of the actin and microtubule systems. Eur. J. Cell Biol., 84: 311-328.
    CrossRef    


  • Sakamoto, T., A. Uezu, S. Kawauchi, T. Kuramoto and K. Makino et al., 2008. Mass spectrometric analysis of microtubule co-sediment proteins from rat brain. Genes Cells, 13: 295-312.
    PubMed    


  • Svitkina, T.M., A.B. Verkhovsky, K.M. McQuade and G.G. Borisy, 1997. Analysis of the actin-myosin ii system in fish epidermal keratocytes: Mechanism of cell body translocation. J. Cell Biol., 139: 397-415.
    PubMed    


  • Schaub, S., J.J. Meister and A.B. Verkhovsky, 2007. Analysis of actin filament network organization in lamellipodia by comparing experimental and simulated images. J. Cell Sci., 120: 1491-1500.
    CrossRef    


  • Saraf, S., R. Rathi, C.D. Kaur and S. Saraf, 2011. Colloidosomes an advanced vesicular system in drug delivery. Asian J. Scient. Res., 4: 1-15.
    CrossRef    


  • Magin, T.M., J. Reichelt and M. Hatzfeld, 2004. Emerging functions: Diseases and animalmodels reshape our view of the cytoskeleton. Exp. Cell Res., 301: 91-102.
    PubMed    


  • Vieira, P.B., F.P. Borges, B. Gottardi, C. Stuepp, A.B. Larre, T. Tasca and G.A. De Carli, 2008. Analysis of microtubule cytoskeleton distribution using a fluorescent taxoid in two trichomonadid protozoa: Trichomonas gallinae and Tritrichomonas foetus. Exp. Parasitol., 119: 186-191.
    CrossRef    


  • Vinolas, N., M. Provencio, N. Reguart, F. Cardenal and V. Alberola et al., 2011. Single nucleotide polymorphisms in MDR1 gen correlates with outcome in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with cisplatin plus vinorelbine. Lung Cancer, 71: 191-198.


  • Visegrady, B., D. Lorinczy, G. Hild, B. Somogyi and M. Nyitrai, 2004. The effect of phalloidin and jasplakinolide on the flexibility and thermal stability of actin filaments. FEBS Lett., 565: 163-166.
    CrossRef    


  • Wagner, O.I., S. Rammensee, N. Korde, Q. Wen, J.F. Leterrier and P.A. Janmey, 2007. Softness, strength and self-repair in intermediate filament networks. Exp. Cell Res., 313: 2228-2235.
    PubMed    


  • Wang, Z., W. Xu, L. Liu and Z. Ding, 2011. The effect of cerebral spinal fluid replacement on acute myelopathy induced by intrathecal therapy of leukemia. Leuk. Res., (In Press).


  • Wang, Y.L., 1989. Fluorescent analog cytochemistry: Tracing functional protein components in living cells. Method Cell Biol., 29: 1-12.
    PubMed    


  • Tian, W., L. Qin, Q. Song, L. He and M. Ai1 et al., 2010. A novel synthetic analog of 5, 8-disubstituted quinazolines blocks mitosis and induces apoptosis of tumor cells by inhibiting microtubule polymerization. PLoS ONE, 5: 1-9.
    CrossRef    


  • Yao, H.J., R.J. Ju, X.X. Wang, Y. Zhang and R.J. Li et al., 2011. The antitumor efficacy of functional paclitaxel nanomicelles in treating resistant breast cancers by oral delivery. Biomaterials, 32: 3285-3302.


  • Heng, Y.W. and C.G. Koh, 2010. Actin cytoskeleton dynamics and the cell division cycle. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., 42: 1622-1633.
    PubMed    


  • Iwamoto, Y. and M. Tamura, 1988. Immunocytochemical study of intermediate filaments in cultured human trabecular cells. Invest. Ophth. Vis. Sci., 29: 244-250.
    PubMed    


  • Zeybek, N.D., S. Inan, N. Ekerbicer, H.S. Vatansever, J. Karakaya and S.F. Muftuoglu, 2011. The effects of Gemcitabine and Vinorelbine on inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) distribution of MCF-7 Breast cancer cells. Acta Histochem., 113: 62-67.
    CrossRef    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved