HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Research Journal of Veterinary Sciences

Year: 2016 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 1-10
DOI: 10.17311/rjvs.2016.1.10
Coagulase Negative Staphylococcal Species Mastitis: An Overview
P. Krishnamoorthy, M.L. Satyanarayana and B.R. Shome

Abstract: Bovine mastitis is one of economically important disease affecting livestock and causing economic losses to dairy farmers in India. Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CNS) species also infects the mammary glands of animals and leads to persistent or subclinical mastitis. The prevalence of CNS mastitis in various parts of the world were 6-72 and 6-30% in subclinical and clinical mastitis cases, respectively. Epidemiology of CNS species causing mastitis in animals gives the newer approaches for preventing the occurrence of CNS species mastitis. The CNS species predominantly isolated from milk were S. chromogenes, S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. simulans, S. warneri, S. hominis, S. saprophyticus, S. xylosus, S. hyicus, S. sciuri and S. intermedius. The S. epidermidis intramammary infections were found in multiparous cow and S. chromogenes in primiparous cows. The CNS mastitis shows only mild clinical signs and cause persistent infections, resulting in increased milk SCC, which affects milk quality and may be related to decreased milk production. The clinical signs, diagnosis and treatment of CNS mastitis are necessary for effective control and prevention. There was emergence of CNS species as an important mastitis causing pathogen in subclinical mastitis and persistence infection of udder in dairy animals of India and world. In conclusion, there is need to further identify the CNS at species level and also systematic experimental study of various CNS species in dairy animals is required for better understanding the occurrence of CNS mastitis in livestock of India. Further, comparative study of CNS mastitis with organisms causing severe mastitis in various animal models to know the basic mechanisms of host pathogen interaction using advance molecular biology tools is necessary.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
P. Krishnamoorthy, M.L. Satyanarayana and B.R. Shome, 2016. Coagulase Negative Staphylococcal Species Mastitis: An Overview. Research Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 9: 1-10.

Keywords: treatment, diagnosis, Coagulase negative staphylococcal species, clinical signs, identification and epidemiology

INTRODUCTION

Bovine mastitis (mast = breast, itis = inflammation) a major disease affecting dairy cattle worldwide, results from the inflammation of the mammary gland. The severity of the inflammation can be classified into sub-clinical, clinical and chronic forms and its degree is dependent on the nature of the causative pathogen and on the age, breed, immunological health and lactation state of the animal. Sub-clinical mastitis is difficult to detect due to the absence of any visible indications and it has major cost implications. Chronic mastitis is a rare form of the disease but results in persistent inflammation of the mammary gland. The direct effects of mastitis are temporary or permanent loss in milk production, poor milk quality, reduction in price, treatment costs, labour costs, premature culling, etc. In India the total annual economic losses due to mastitis was calculated to be 7165.51 crore rupees (Bansal and Gupta, 2009).

Till date more than 50 Staphylococcus species and subspecies have been characterized. The Staphylococcus genus has been divided in to coagulase positive and coagulase negative based on their ability to coagulate rabbit plasma. Coagulase Negative Staphylococcus (CNS) species have become more important as bovine mastitis causing agents during recent years. The CNS species are the most frequently isolated microorganisms in bovine intramammary infections (IMI) in many countries. More than 10 different coagulase negative Staphylococcus species have been isolated from mastitis bovine milk samples and the species most commonly reported are Staphylococcus chromogenes and Staphylococcus simulans (Trinidad et al., 1990; Matthews et al., 1992). Staphylococcus hyicus and Staphylococcus epidermidis have also frequently been isolated (Myllys, 1995; Thorberg et al., 2006). These bacteria are sometimes referred to as environmental staphs and most frequent organisms isolated from milk samples from herds that have controlled the major pathogens (Janus, 2009). In Asia, recent reports indicated the changing trends from Staphylococcus aureus to coagulase negative staphylococci as major mastitis causing organism (Sharma et al., 2012). The CNS has traditionally been considered to be minor mastitis pathogens, especially in comparison with major pathogens such as Staphylococcus aureus, streptococci and coliforms. In India, not much work has been carried out on coagulase negative Staphylococcus species causing subclinical and clinical mastitis in bovines. Mouse is a suitable model to study coagulase negative Staphylococcus species induced bovine subclinical mastitis (Krishnamoorthy et al., 2014b).

IDENTIFICATION

The CNS are normally not identified at species level but are treated as a uniform group. Some CNS species may be more virulent or have different clinical characteristics, but evidence is still lacking. Most of the species are determined based on various phenotypic characteristics, such as colony morphology, haemolysis patterns and various biochemical reactions. Coagulase-negative staphylococci produce large, smooth, entire colonies that are white (un-pigmented), creamy, greyish-white, tan or golden-yellow colour. Colonies of some species may have a rough, irregular appearance and generally have no haemolysis or may produce a narrow (<2 mm) diffuse zone of complete haemolysis at 24 h. A few species will produce a larger, diffuse zone of incomplete haemolysis, not to be confused with the sharp-bordered zones of haemolysis displayed by S. aureus isolates. Gram-staining will reveal Gram-positive cocci in pairs, tetrads or irregular clusters (Hogan et al., 1999). In addition, difficulties encountered in CNS differentiation to species level and the use of different identification schemes or systems also play a role. This was also the reason why routine veterinary laboratories do not usually identify CNS at the species level or use simple diagnostic tests like DNase activity to differentiate clusters of CNS.

Identification based on these conventional tests was time-consuming and costly; therefore tests like API Staph (bioMerieux, France) and Staph-Zym (Rosco, Denmark), for rapid identification of Staphylococcus species were commonly used. Internal transcribed spacer PCR, based on the polymorphism of the 16S-23S rDNA spacer region was an adequate tool for the identification of Staphylococcus species from cases of bovine mastitis (Bes et al., 2000). It was shown that tDNA-intergenic spacer PCR was very accurate in identifying S. chromogenes (Devriese et al., 2002). Newer studies have focussed on sequencing of genes like the rpoB gene (Zadoks et al., 2006) 16S rRNA gene and/or tuf gene (Heikens et al., 2005). Zadoks et al. (2006) concluded that when DNA-sequence based species identification as gold standard, phenotypic identification was unreliable. For studies aimed at understanding the impact of CNS species on milk quality and udder health, DNA-sequence based speciation was preferable. However, these tests do not identify all Staphylococcus species, especially those from veterinary samples (Bes et al., 2000). In a study conducted using PCR-Restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis of a partial groEL gene sequence showed a reliable and reproducible molecular method of identification of CNS species responsible for bovine mastitis (Da Silva Santos et al., 2008). The (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting based identification of CNS species achieved a typeability of 94.7% and an accuracy of 94.3% when compared to identifications based on gene sequencing (Braem et al., 2011).

The methods based on molecular genetics are developing rapidly and this seems to have created a new problem in that the bacterial phenotypes and genotypes do not necessarily match (Heikens et al., 2005). An ideal system would identify the CNS species relevant in mastitis rapidly and accurately directly from milk and perhaps simultaneously detect the blaZ gene, indicating resistance to penicillin G. It would be important to know about penicillin resistance of the isolate because it affects the choice of antimicrobial treatment and also prognosis for cure. Some other antimicrobial resistance genes, if such resistance genes were considered important in relation to mastitis treatment, could also be determined. The CNS species responsible for the majority of bovine CNS mastitis cases are probably different from those in human medicine (Jarp, 1991; Waage et al., 1999). There was no knowledge about how many of the isolates identified as particular CNS species and do genetically really belong to that species. Most studies concerning CNS species isolated from bovine mastitis were conducted a long time ago, using methods based on phenotypic characteristics of the bacterial isolates. Before any identification method can be adopted into mastitis diagnostics, more knowledge about CNS species involved in bovine mastitis is needed.

EPIDEMIOLOGY OF COAGULASE NEGATIVE STAPHYLOCOCCAL MASTITIS

The epidemiology of CNS mastitis still is unclear, although a number of studies have been conducted to identify the reservoirs of CNS. The CNS species were isolated from different body sites of cows, heifers and calves, from udder secretions, milk and cows environment (Matthews et al., 1992). A wide range of CNS species have been isolated and identified most often using methods based on the phenotype. The S. chromogenes, S. epidermidis, S. intermedius, S. warneri, S. haemolyticus, S. sciuri and S. xylosus were isolated in several studies from milk samples, teat canals, teat skin or skin on other body sites (Matthews et al., 1992; Aarestrup et al., 1995; Chaffer et al., 1999). The S. xylosus and S. sciuri were shown to be part of the normal bovine skin microbiota and have been isolated from bedding and the cow’s environment. The S. cohnii and S. saprophyticus were also common in the cow’s environment (Matos et al., 1991). The percentage prevalence of CNS species in subclinical mastitis and clinical mastitis were presented in Table 1 and 2 respectively. In a study from ovine milk samples using PCR-RFLP of 16S rRNA and gap genes showed S. epidermidis (57.9%), S. caprae (15%) and S. chromogenes (13.2%) out of 226 CNS isolates collected from 2201 milk samples from sarda sheep in Italy (Onni et al., 2010). Intramammary infections in goat milk of Sweden was studied and found 39 (18%) of the milk samples out of 222 milk samples with udder pathogens. The most frequently isolated bacterial species was CNS species (72%) followed by Staphylococcus aureus (23%) (Persson and Olofsson, 2011).

Seasonal differences in occurrence of CNS mastitis have been reported. In Finland, the prevalence of CNS and S. aureus mastitis was highest during winter and spring, i.e., during the indoor season (Koivula et al., 2007). In Norway, the highest prevalence of CNS mastitis was found during the late indoor season. The prevalence of CNS mastitis is higher in primiparous cows than in older cows (Tenhagen et al., 2006). The CNS can colonize the mammary gland of pregnant heifers (Myllys, 1995) and were isolated from the mammary gland and teat apices of heifers as young as 10 months old (De Vliegher et al., 2003).

Table 1: Prevalence of CNS in subclinical mastitis around the world

Table 2: Prevalence of CNS in clinical mastitis around the world

The prevalence of positive teat orifices from heifers sampled approximately 2 weeks prior to calving was as follows: 28% S. chromogenes, 3.5% S. simulans, 2.8% S. hominis and 2.1% S. epidermidis (Matthews et al., 1992). The CNS is important pathogens in cattle of all ages, but the predominant CNS species causing infection seems to differ between age groups. The S. chromogenes was the major CNS species in pre-calving heifers and primiparous cows (Trinidad et al., 1990; Rajala-Schultz et al., 2007; Taponen et al., 2006) whereas, S. simulans was mostly isolated from cows in later lactations (Taponen et al., 2006). Multiparous cows generally become infected with CNS during later lactation whereas primiparous cows usually already have the infection at the beginning of lactation (Taponen et al., 2007). Prevalence of CNS IMI was higher in heifers compared to older cows (Sampimon et al., 2009). In cows with subclinical mastitis, S. epidermidis IMI were mainly found in multiparous cows where as S. chromogenes IMI were mainly found in primiparous cows (Thorberg et al., 2009).

VIRULENCE FACTORS

Various virulence factors, including production of haemolysins, leucocidins, exfoliative toxins, enterotoxins, toxic-shock syndrome toxin, slime and biofilm formation were found in S. aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis (Cucarella et al., 2004; Zecconi et al., 2006) but only few studies have focused on the search for such virulence factors from CNS isolated from mastitis. Adherence and internalization of CNS into mammary epithelial cells was studied in cell cultures and were able to adhere to bovine mammary cells (Hyvonen et al., 2007). The adhesive capacity of various CNS was almost equal to the adhesive capacity of S. aureus, but the invasive capacity of S. aureus was stronger than that of CNS strains. Kuroishi et al. (2003) found that a high percentage of both S. aureus and CNS from bovine subclinical, chronic or acute mastitis produced staphylococcal enterotoxins and/or toxic shock syndrome toxin-1. Somewhat surprisingly, production of different staphylococcal enterotoxins and toxic shock syndrome toxin 1 were as common in CNS isolates as in S. aureus isolates and as common in isolates originating from subclinical mastitis as in those from chronic or acute mastitis. Biofilm-associated proteins were found among bovine mastitis isolates, including S. aureus, S. epidermidis, S. chromogenes, S. hyicus and S. xylosus (Cucarella et al., 2004). Oliveira et al. (2006) found 6 out of 16 S. aureus and 6 out of 16 S. epidermidis isolates from subclinical mastitis to be phenotypically positive for biofilm production. Biofilm formation in staphylococci isolated from bovine mastitis or humans has been associated at least with gene loci ica (intercellular adhesion), bap (biofilm-associated protein), agr (accessory gene regulator) and sar (staphylococcal accessory regulator), but isolates able to form biofilm do not necessarily carry all these genes. The bap gene was identified in mastitis causing staphylococci with marked ability to produce biofilm and which belonged to several species, including S. epidermidis, S. chromogenes, S. xylosus, S. simulans and S. hyicus (Tormo et al., 2005). Leitner et al. (2003) studied virulence of S. aureus and CNS using a mouse model. Seven strains of S. aureus and one strain of each of S. chromogenes and S. intermedius isolated from chronic bovine mastitis were studied. Mice were experimentally infected in one limb and thereafter inspected for morbidity (arthritis and gangrene) and mortality. One S. aureus isolate producing α-haemolysin was the most virulent, followed by isolates producing α+β-haemolysin and α-haemolysin. The least virulent isolates were the non-haemolytic S. aureus strains, but even they were more virulent than the S. chromogenes and S. intermedius isolates tested. The two CNS isolates do not caused morbidity or mortality in the mice.

CLINICAL SIGNS

The CNS have been regarded as minor pathogen that mostly infect heifers around calving do not cause clinical signs, cause only a slight increase in the somatic cell count and disappear soon after parturition. It is generally held that in CNS mastitis only mild local signs are usually seen, such as slight swelling and changes in the milk appearance, but studies that have thoroughly investigated clinical characteristics of mastitis caused by CNS are very few. Jarp (1991) reported that clinical signs of CNS mastitis most often were subclinical or mild clinical, although severe clinical signs occasionally were recorded. Bleu et al. (2006) reported on three cases of toxic mastitis caused by staphylococci other than S. aureus, the status of coagulase production of the isolates was not reported.

Trinidad et al. (1990) studied histopathologic changes in 7 mammary glands of unbred heifers experimentally infected with S. aureus Newbould 305 (ATCC 27940), one quarter naturally infected with S. aureus and three quarters naturally infected with CNS. The quarters infected with S. aureus and CNS showed less alveolar, epithelial and luminal areas, more inter alveolar stroma and greater leukocyte infiltration compared with the uninfected quarters. In quarters infected with CNS, histopathologic changes were not as marked as in quarters infected with S. aureus. Benites et al. (2002) studied histopathology of lactating dairy cows culled due to mastitis. The histopathologic changes of 99 quarters infected with CNS and 14 quarters infected with S. aureus mainly showed chronic inflammatory response or chronic inflammatory response with repair and no differences in the histopathologic changes were observed between S. aureus and CNS infected quarters.

EFFECT ON MILK

Compared with infections caused by other common Gram-positive mastitis pathogens, such as S. aureus and streptococci, the SCC in quarters infected with CNS was rather low. It is, however, about 10-fold higher than the SCC of healthy quarters, which typically remains under 50,000 cells per milliliter. In a study of Djabri et al. (2002), the geometric mean SCC in the CNS infected quarters was 1,38,000 cells per milliliter and in the S. aureus infected quarters 3,57,000 cells per milliliter. Although the mean SCC in CNS infected quarters is rather low, CNS infection can occasionally raise SCC markedly. In a study in which dairy cows were followed-up throughout the whole lactation, the geometric mean SCC was over 6,00,000 cells per milliliter in quarters with persistent CNS infection and about 60,000 cells per milliliter in healthy quarters (Taponen et al., 2007). In general, increases in milk SCC over 1,00,000 cells per milliliter are associated with reduced milk production. Elevated milk SCC theoretically results in less milk per animal going into the bulk tank. In studies on the effect of CNS IMI on milk production, a slightly decreased milk production has been reported (Grohn et al., 2004). Simojoki et al. (2009) reported that the mean peak SCC after an experimental challenge with S. chromogenes was 20,00,000 cells per milliliter. The S. chromogenes, S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus showed increased SCC levels at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h after IMI. Coagulase negative staphylococci (C) species can increase the mice milk somatic cell count moderately but two to four fold increase was observed in S. aureus which indicated the subclinical nature of CNS infections in animals (Krishnamoorthy et al., 2014a). The S. chromogenes, S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus can increase the mice viable bacterial count moderately but ten to fifteen fold increase was observed in S. aureus infected mice mammary gland (Krishnamoorthy et al., 2014b). Intramammary infection by CNS causes inflammatory reaction in the infected gland, which can be detected using various indicators for inflammation in the milk. Elevated concentrations of milk N-acetyl- β-glucosaminidase (NAGase) activity, antitrypsin and Serum Amyloid A (SAA) were reported during IMI caused by CNS. The S. chromogenes, S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus induced haemato-biochemical changes in haemoglobin, WBC, neutrophil, glucose, total protein, AST and LDH, which may be used as indicators for diagnosis of CNS species mastitis in mice (Krishnamoorthy et al., 2015).

The normal variation in milk production of different cows is high and therefore large datasets are needed to verify significant difference in the effects on the milk production caused by IMIs with different mastitis pathogens. The CNS is the main cause of mastitis in cows in their first lactation, so it is likely to be responsible for possible production losses. The CNS mastitis seems to be concentrated in the higher producers and comparison of the milk production of cows with or without CNS mastitis may lead to an underestimation of production losses caused by CNS mastitis.

CURRENT APPROACHES IN MASTITIS DIAGNOSIS

California Mastitis Test (CMT): This assay indirectly measures the SCC in milk samples. A bromocresol-purple-containing detergent is used to break down the cell membrane of somatic cells and the subsequent release and aggregation of nucleic acid forms a gel-like matrix with a viscosity that is proportional to the leukocyte number. Advantages: Cost effective, rapid, user friendly and can be used ‘On-site’ or in the laboratory. Disadvantages: It can be difficult to interpret and has low sensitivity.

Portacheck: This assay uses an esterase-catalysed enzymatic reaction to determine the SCC in milk. Advantages: Cost effective, rapid and user friendly. Disadvantage: Low sensitivity at low SCCs.

Fossomatic SCC: This counter operates on the principle of optical fluorescence. Ethidium bromide penetrates and intercalates with nuclear DNA and the fluoresecent signal generated is used to estimate the SCC in milk. Advantages: Rapid and automated. Disadvantages: The device is expensive and complex to use.

Delaval cell counter: This counter operates on the principle of optical fluorescence, whereby propidium iodide is used to stain nuclear DNA to estimate the SCC in milk. Advantages: Rapid and the device is easily transportable. Disadvantage: Relatively expensive.

Electrical Conductivity (EC) test: This test measures the increase in conductance in milk caused by the elevation in levels of ions such as sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium and chloride during inflammation. Advantage: Can be used ‘On-site’. Disadvantage: Non-mastitis-related variations in EC can present problems in diagnosis.

Culture tests: Laboratory-based tests use selective culture to identify different microorganisms involved in causing mastitis. Advantage: Identifies specific pathogens causing mastitis. Disadvantages: Cannot be used ‘on-site’ and the waiting time for results can be days.

pH test: The rise in milk pH, due to mastitis is detected using bromothymol blue. Advantages: User friendly, cost effective and rapid. Disadvantage: Not as sensitive as other tests.

Enzymes: Assays are used to detect enzymes, such as N-acetyl β-D-glucosaminidase and lactate dehydrogenase. Advantage: Assays are rapid. Disadvantage: Assays might be laboratory-based.

RECENT APPROACHES

New biomarkers for mastitis and advances in relevant proteomics techniques such as two dimensional gel electrophoresis and mass spectroscopy have led to identification of several new proteins involved in mastitis. Six chaperones with a role in pathogen recognition were identified only in mastitis samples and therefore have potential as new markers for mastitis. Markers like prostaglandin D synthetase and proteins like serotransferrin and bovine serum albumin in milk can be used for diagnosis. Immunoassays such as ELISA can provide a reliable and inexpensive approach provided that suitable antibodies are available against specific inflammation related biomarkers or the causative microorganisms. The genome sequences of many of the major mastitis causing pathogens are now available and can be utilized to develop nucleic acid based testing methods such as PCR. Such tests are generally more expensive than immunoassays. However, they are highly sensitive and specific can be performed rapidly and can overcome the sensitivity and time constraints sometimes encountered with culture based tests and thus could complement or replace them in the long term. Multiplex PCR and real time PCR assay that can simultaneously detect different mastitis causing organisms in milk samples were developed (Viguier et al., 2009). A two tube multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of 10 bacterial species like S. aureus, S. chromogenes, S. epidermidis, S. scuiri, S. haemolyticus, S. simulans, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, Streptococcus uberis and Escherichia coli in milk was developed recently (Shome et al., 2011). The proinflammatory mediators showed increased expression of IL-1β, IL-4, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α and IFN-γ in S. haemolyticus and S. aureus, IL-1β, IL-4 and IFN-γ in S. epidermidis, IL-4, IL-6, IL-12, TNF-α and IFN-γ in S. chromogenes infected mice and may be used as probable indicators for CNS species mastitis in animals (Krishnamoorthy, 2013).

TREATMENT

Spontaneous elimination rate of CNS mastitis is generally regarded as high. Some studies have demonstrated spontaneous elimination rates of as high as 60-70% for IMI caused by CNS. There was also evidence that CNS infections may persist for long periods in mammary gland (Chaffer et al., 1999). The strategies for treatment of mastitis vary among different countries. In some countries subclinical mastitis was treated during lactation, but in others subclinical and mild clinical mastitis such as CNS mastitis was left untreated or treated using conservative means such as frequent milking-out. Subclinical and mild clinical mastitis caused by CNS are often left untreated, the rationale being that CNS will be eliminated spontaneously. Not many treatment studies that separately report results for quarters infected by CNS have been published. Based on those available, it seems that mastitis caused by CNS responds well to antimicrobial treatment. Bacteriological cure ranges from 80-90% (Taponen et al., 2006). Treatment duration varies from 2-4 days in various studies. There was no consensus about the optimum duration of treatment of CNS mastitis. Subclinical mastitis can treated using antibiotics after doing antibiotic susceptibility testing for accurate use of antibiotics sensitive to the mastitis pathogens. The rate of transfer is directly proportional to the concentration gradient across the blood–milk barrier and the lipid solubility of the drug. The milk-to-plasma equilibrium concentration ratio of total (non-ionized plus ionized) drug is determined by (1) The degree of ionization of the drug, which is pKa/pH-dependent, in blood and milk, (2) The charge on the ionized moiety and (3) The extent of binding of plasma proteins and milk macromolecules. It has been shown that only the lipid-soluble, non-ionized moiety of a weak organic acid or base that is free (not bound to proteins) in the plasma can diffuse through the cellular barriers and more readily reach the mammary gland. Majority of the antibiotics and the antibacterials are weak organic electrolytes, either acids (amoxycillin, ampicillin, cloxacillin, penicillin G, novobiocin and sulfanilamide) or bases (tylosin, lincomycin, spiramycin, erythromycin, trimethoprime, aminoglycosides and polymyxin B) tetracyclines are amphoteric compounds and chloramphenicol is neutral. Fluoroquinolones (enrofloxacin and pefloxacin) are lipophillic and possess low degree of ionization. Accordingly in normal lactating cows (milk pH 6.5-6.8) weak acids attain milk and plasma concentration ratio of less than or equal to 1 because of their ionization at normal blood pH whereas organic bases excluding aminoglycosides (streptomycin, gentamicin, kanamycin and neomycin) and spectinomycin attain milk to plasma ratio of greater than 1. Therefore, lipophilic bases are preferred antibiotics because of these attaining higher concentrations in milk. Although this favoured distribution decreases with increasing pH of mastitic milk, particularly for macrilides, but antibacterial activity of macrolides and aminoglycosides is not interfered. In the presence of mastitis, the pH of milk increases to within the range 6.9-7.2. As a consequence the ion trapping effect on lipophilic organic bases is reduced while the concentrations attained by weak organic acids are somewhat increased. The inflammatory reaction in udder tissues enhances the passage of penicillins into milk. The increased pH of milk does not affect the concentrations attained by amphoteric drugs (fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines and rifampicin), but antimicrobial activity of these drugs is lower in milk than in extracellular fluid or in vitro determination would predict. Intramammary route was accepted as the route of choice in the treatment of subclinical, chronic or mild clinical mastitis and as prevention during dry cow therapy. Intramammary administration permits delivery of the antibiotic directly to the mammary gland. However, Intra mammary preparations are used, often in conjunction with parenteral preparations (Sudhan and Sharma, 2010). Mastitis can be controlled by using effective dry cow therapy, consistent application of sanitary procedures during milking, selective culling of chronically infected cows and adequate treatment of clinical cases. Supportive treatment like use of anti-inflammatory drugs, fluid replacement and drugs to counter hypocalcemia and hypokalemia may be used.

Treatment of clinical mastitis due to CNS species sensitive to novobiocin: Penicillins and/or penethamate or cephalosporins (intramammary and/or parenteral route). Treatment of mastitis due to CNS resistant to novobiocin: The treatment is not necessary since spontaneous cures are seen. Antibiotic treatment in drying: Penicillin’s and/or Penethamate or cephalosporin’s. Sixteen isolates of CNS (mecA gene was identified in 15 isolates) were classified as methicillin resistant and 96 isolates as methicillin susceptible by disc diffusion and broth micro dilution for oxacillin susceptibility in 121 CNS isolates tested (Feβler et al., 2010). The prevalence of β-lactamase producing isolates varied markedly between CNS species and was significantly higher in S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus (~40%), than in S. simulans and S. chromogenes where none or a few of the isolates produced β-lactamase. Resistance to more than one antimicrobial substance occurred in 9 and 7% of the clinical and subclinical isolates respectively (Waller et al., 2011). Persson et al. (2011) reported that 35% of CNS isolates were resistant to penicillin G and resistance to other antimicrobials was uncommon. In a study with 180 confirmed CNS species showed lowest susceptibility of 23.23% to penicillin in 310 milk samples screened in Dharwad region in Karnataka (Kaliwal et al., 2011).

A single isolation of CNS from a quarter does not economically justify antimicrobial treatment, in particular if only low numbers of bacteria are detected in the milk sample. CNS is common bacteria on the teat skin and can sometimes contaminate the milk sample. Furthermore, the spontaneous elimination rate of CNS infections without any treatment is relatively high. If moderate or severe clinical signs are evident, treatment can be recommended. Intra mammary treatment with antimicrobials can also be recommended for quarters with persistent CNS mastitis. Selection of antimicrobial drugs should be based on susceptibility testing.

CONCLUSION AND FUTURE RECOMMENDATION

The CNS has become the most common mastitis pathogens in many countries. The prevalence of CNS in subclinical and clinical mastitis was 6-72 and 6-30% respectively in various countries. The CNS species predominantly isolated from milk S. chromogenes, S. epidermidis, S. haemolyticus, S. simulans, S. warneri, S. hominis, S. saprophyticus, S. xylosus, S. hyicus, S. sciuri and S. intermedius, but vary between countries of the world. The CNS species were prevalent in milk samples from heifers and more prominently present in early lactation compared to later in lactation. Persistent intramammary infections were most common in quarter’s infected with S. chromogenes, S. epidermidis and S. simulans indicating more relevance for bovine subclinical mastitis than other species. The S. epidermidis intramammary infections were found in multiparous cow and S. chromogenes in primiparous cows. The CNS mastitis mostly remains subclinical or shows only mild clinical signs. CNS can cause persistent infections, resulting in increased milk SCC which affects milk quality and may be related to decreased milk production. Treatment choices must be based on sound scientifically based strategies. Infection rates, treatment success and milk quality parameters have to be monitored and reviewed regularly. Public and regulatory concerns for food safety and quality will have a greater influence on animal’s disease treatment and drug availability in future. The CNS mastitis responds well to antimicrobial therapy.

Further studies in the field of identification of CNS species from cows are required and not as group identification. The systematic studies on CNS induced subclinical mastitis are necessary to control the bovine subclinical mastitis caused by CNS species. Comparative studies of CNS organisms with that of Staphylococcus aureus in various animal models (mice, rabbit, etc.) or in bovines are necessary to understand the basic mechanisms of host pathogen interaction using advanced molecular biology tools. In future, CNS organisms will be the most important pathogen in sub clinical mastitis which requires more attention in future in areas of diagnosis, treatment and control of mastitis in bovines.

REFERENCES

  • Aarestrup, F.M., H.C. Wegener, V.T. Rosdahl and N.E. Jensen, 1995. Staphylococcal and other bacterial species associated with intramammary infections in Danish dairy herds. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, 36: 475-487.
    PubMed    


  • Ahire, S.J., R.A. Nale, D.G. Dighe, D.V. Keskar and A. Samad, 2008. Bacterial flora in udder secretion of buffaloes during dry period. Indian J. Vet. Med., 28: 61-62.


  • Bansal, B.K. and D.K. Gupta, 2009. Economic analysis of bovine mastitis in India and Punjab-A review. Indian J. Dairy Sci., 62: 337-345.
    Direct Link    


  • Bakir, M., R. Sabrina and M. Toufik, 2011. Antibacterial susceptibility profiles of sub-clinical mastitis pathogens isolated from cows in Batna and Setif governorates (East of Algeria). Vet. World, 4: 537-541.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Benites, N.R., J.L. Guerra, P.A. Melville and E.O. da Costa, 2002. Aetiology and histopathology of bovine mastitis of espontaneous occurrence. J. Vet. Med. Ser. B, 49: 366-370.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bes, M., V. Guerin-Faublee, H. Meugnier, J. Etienne and J. Freney, 2000. Improvement of the identification of staphylococci isolated from bovine mammary infections using molecular methods. Vet. Microbiol., 71: 287-294.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bleu, U., K. Sacher, S. Corti and U. Braun, 2006. Clinical findings in 56 cows with toxic mastitis. Vet. Rec., 159: 677-679.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Braem, G., S. De Vliegher, K. Supre, F. Haesebrouck, F. Leroy and L. De Vuyst, 2011. (GTG)5-PCR fingerprinting for the classification and identification of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species from bovine milk and teat apices: A comparison of type strains and field isolates. Vet. Microbiol., 147: 67-74.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chaffer, M., G. Leitner, M. Winkler, A. Glickman, O. Krifucks, E. Ezra and A. Saran, 1999. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and mammary gland infections in cows. J. Vet. Med. Ser. B, 46: 707-712.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Cheng, D.R., S.Y. Zhu, Y.H. Yin, W.W. Ding, Z.X. Mu, Z.R. Su and H.C. Sun, 2010. Prevalence of bacterial infection responsible for bovine mastitis. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 4: 1110-1116.
    Direct Link    


  • Cucarella, C., M.A. Tormo, C. Ubeda, M.P. Trotonda and M. Monzon et al., 2004. Role of biofilm-associated protein bap in the pathogenesis of bovine Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immunity, 72: 2177-2185.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Das, P.K. and E. Joseph, 2005. Identification and antibigram of microbes associated with buffalo mastitis in Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. Buffalo Bull., 24: 3-9.
    Direct Link    


  • De Vliegher, S., H. Laevens, L.A. Devriese, G. Opsomer, J.L.M. Leroy, H.W. Barkema and A. de Kruif, 2003. Prepartum teat apex colonization with Staphylococcus chromogenes in dairy heifers is associated with low somatic cell count in early lactation. Vet. Microbiol., 92: 245-252.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Devriese, L.A., M. Baele, M. Vaneechoutte, A. Martel and F. Haesebrouck, 2002. Identification and antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus chromogenes isolates from intramammary infections of dairy cows. Vet. Microbiol., 87: 175-182.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dingwell, R.T., K.E. Leslie, Y.H. Schukken, J.M. Sargeant and L.L. Timms et al., 2004. Association of cow and quarter-level factors at drying-off with new intramammary infections during the dry period. Prev. Vet. Med., 63: 75-89.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Djabri, B., N. Bareille, F. Beaudeau and H. Seegers, 2002. Quarter milk somatic cell count in infected dairy cows: A meta-analysis. Vet. Res., 33: 335-357.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Dubal, Z.B., H. Rahman, P. Pal, A. Kumar and K. Pradhan, 2010. Characterization and antimicrobial sensitivity of the pathogens isolated from bovine mastitis with special reference to Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus spp. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 80: 1163-1167.
    Direct Link    


  • Dutta, J.B., 2009. Coagulase negative staphylococci from bovine subclinical mastitis. Proceedings of the 27th ISVM International Summit and Convention at Chennai, February 19-21, 2009, Tamilnadu, India, pp: 19-23.


  • Feβler, A.T., C. Billerbeck, K. Kadlec and S. Schwarz, 2010. Identification and characterization of methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci from bovine mastitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 65: 1576-1582.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gillespie, B.E., S.I. Headrick, S. Boonyayatra and S.P. Oliver, 2009. Prevalence and persistence of coagulase-negative Staphylococcus species in three dairy research herds. Vet. Microbiol., 134: 65-72.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Haltia, L., T. Honkanen-Buzalski, I. Spiridonova, A. Olkonen and V. Myllys, 2006. A study of bovine mastitis, milking procedures and management practices on 25 Estonian dairy herds. Acta Vet. Scandinavica, Vol. 48.
    CrossRef    


  • Heikens, E., A. Fleer, A. Paauw, A. Florijn and A.C. Fluit, 2005. Comparison of genotypic and phenotypic methods for species-level identification of clinical isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Clin. Microbiol., 43: 2286-2290.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hogan, J.S., R.N. Gonzalez, R.J. Harmon, S.C. Nickerson, S.P. Oliver, J.W. Pankey and K.L. Smith, 1999. Laboratory Handbook on Bovine Mastitis. National Mastitis Council, USA., pp: 1-33


  • Hyvonen, P., S. Kayhko, S. Taponen, A. Von Wright and S. Pyorala, 2007. Internalization by mammary epithelial cells of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine mastitis. Proceedings of the Heifer Mastitis Conference, June 24-26, 2007, Ghent, Belgium, pp: 42-43.


  • Janus, A., 2009. Emerging mastitis pathogens. Vet. World, 2: 38-39.
    Direct Link    


  • Jarp, J., 1991. Classification of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine clinical and subclinical mastitis. Vet. Microbiol., 27: 151-158.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kaliwal, B.B., S.O. Sadashiv, M.M. Kurjogi and R.D. Sanakal, 2011. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from bovine mastitis. Vet. World, 4: 158-161.
    Direct Link    


  • Koivula, M., A. Pitkala, S. Pyorala and E.A. Mantysaari, 2007. Distribution of bacteria and seasonal and regional effects in a new database for mastitis pathogens in Finland. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Sect. A: Anim. Sci., 57: 89-96.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Krishnamoorthy, P., 2013. Comparative pathology of mastitis in mouse model using different isolates of coagulase negative Staphylococcus species. Indian J. Vet. Pathol., 37: 234-234.
    Direct Link    


  • Krishnamoorthy, P., M.L. Satyanarayana, B.R. Shome and H. Rahman, 2014. Mouse milk somatic cell count in coagulase negative Staphylococcus species induced mastitis. J. Lab. Anim. Sci., 2: 16-19.


  • Krishnamoorthy, P., M.L. Satyanarayana, B.R. Shome and H. Rahman, 2014. Mouse milk bacterial count in coagulase negative Staphylococcus species induced mastitis. J. Lab. Anim. Sci., 2: 5-8.


  • Krishnamoorthy, P., M.L. Satyanarayana, B.R. Shome, S. Rao and H. Rahman, 2015. Haemato-biochemical changes in Staphylococcal species induced mastitis in mouse model. Res. Rev: J. Vet. Sci. Technol., 4: 8-14.
    Direct Link    


  • Krithiga, N., D. Velu, M. Bhuvana, S.D. Mitra and A. Banerjee et al., 2011. Emergence of coagulase negative staphylococci in subclinical bovine mastitis in India. Proceedings of the IAVMI International Conference, June 9-11, 2011, India, pp: 21-.


  • Kuroishi, T., K.I. Komine, K. Kai, M. Itagaki and J. Kobayashi et al., 2003. Concentrations and specific antibodies to staphylococcal enterotoxin-C and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 in bovine mammary gland secretions and inflammatory response to the intramammary inoculation of these toxins. J. Vet. Med. Sci., 65: 899-906.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Leitner, G., O. Krifucks, A. Glickman, A. Younis and A. Saran, 2003. Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis: Virulence, antibody production and protection from challenge in a mouse model. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol., 35: 99-106.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Makovec, J.A. and P.L. Ruegg, 2003. Results of milk samples submitted for microbiological examination in Wisconsin from 1994 to 2001. J. Dairy Sci., 86: 3466-3472.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Matos, J.S., D.G. White, R.J. Harmon and B.E. Langlois, 1991. Isolation of Staphylococcus aureus from sites other than the lactating mammary gland. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 1544-1549.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Matthews, K.R., R.J. Harmon and B.E. Langlois, 1992. Prevalence of Staphylococcus species during the periparturient period in primiparous and multiparous cows. J. Dairy Sci., 75: 1835-1839.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Mekibib, B., M. Furgasa, F. Abunna, B. Megersa and A. Regassa, 2010. Bovine mastitis: Prevalence, risk factors and major pathogens in dairy farms of Holeta Town, Central Ethiopia. Vet. World, 3: 397-403.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Myllys, V., 1995. Staphylococci in heifer mastitis before and after parturition. J. Dairy Res., 62: 51-60.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Nam, H.M., J.M. Kim, S.K. Lim, K.C. Jang and S.C. Jung, 2010. Infectious aetiologies of mastitis on Korean dairy farms during 2008. Res. Vet. Sci., 88: 372-374.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Riekerink, R.O., H. Barkema, D. Poole, D. Kelton and D. Scholl, 2007. Risk factors for incidence rate of clinical mastitis in a nationwide study on Canadian dairy farms. Proceedings of the 46th Annual Meeting of National Mastitis Council, March 30, 2007, Fort Worth, Texas, pp: 204-205.


  • Oliveira, M., R. Bexiga, S.F. Nunes, C. Carneiro, L.M. Cavaco, F. Bernardo and C.L. Vilela, 2006. Biofilm-forming ability profiling of Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis mastitis isolates. Vet. Microbiol., 118: 133-140.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Onni, T., G. Sanna, G.P. Cubeddu, G. Marogna, S. Lollai, G. Leori and S. Tola, 2010. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci isolated from ovine milk samples by PCR-RFLP of 16S rRNA and gap genes. Vet. Microbiol., 144: 347-352.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Persson, Y. and I. Olofsson, 2011. Direct and indirect measurement of somatic cell count as indicator of intramammary infection in dairy goats. Acta Vet. Scandinavica, Vol. 53.
    CrossRef    


  • Persson, Y., A.K.J. Nyman and U.G. Andersson, 2011. Etiology and antimicrobial susceptibility of udder pathogens from cases of subclinical mastitis in dairy cows in Sweden. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica, Vol. 53.
    CrossRef    


  • Pitkala, A., M. Haveri, S. Pyorala, V. Myllys and T. Honkanen-Buzalski, 2004. Bovine mastitis in finland 2001-prevalence, distribution of bacteria and antimicrobial resistance. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 2433-2441.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Poelarends, J.J., H. Hogeveen, O.C. Sampimon and J. Sol, 2001. Monitoring subclinical mastitis in Dutch dairy herds. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Mastitis and Milk Quality, September 13-15, 2001, Vancouver, Canada, pp: 145-149.


  • Rajala-Schultz, P.J., A.H. Torres, F.J. Degraves and W.A. Gebreyes, 2007. Antimicrobial resistance and strain persistence in coagulase-negative staphylococci over the dry period. Proceedings of the Heifer Mastitis Conference, June 24-26, 2007, Ghent, Belgium, pp: 48-49.


  • Ranjan, R., M.K. Gupta and K.K. Singh, 2011. Study of bovine mastitis in different climatic conditions in Jharkhand, India. Vet. World, 4: 205-208.
    Direct Link    


  • Sampimon, O.C., H.W. Barkema, I.M.G.A. Berends, J. Sol and T.J.G.M. Lam, 2009. Prevalence and herd-level risk factors for intramammary infection with coagulase-negative staphylococci in Dutch dairy herds. Vet. Microbiol., 134: 37-44.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Da Silva Santos, O.C., E.M. Barros, M.A.V.P. Brito, M.D.C. de Freire Bastos, K.R.N. dos Santos and M. Giambiagi-deMarval, 2008. Identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci from bovine mastitis using RFLP-PCR of the groEL gene. Vet. Microbiol., 130: 134-140.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schallibaum, M., 2001. Mastitis-pathogens isolated in Switzerland: 1987-1996. IDF Mastitis Newslett., 24: 14-38.


  • Sharma, N., G.J. Rho, Y.H. Hong, T.Y. Kang, H.K. Lee, T.Y. Hur and D.K. Jeong, 2012. Bovine mastitis: An asian perspective. Asian J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 7: 454-476.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Shome, B.R., S. Das Mitra, M. Bhuvana, N. Krithiga and D. Velu et al., 2011. Multiplex PCR assay for species identification of bovine mastitis pathogens. J. Applied Microbiol., 111: 1349-1356.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Shpigel, N.Y., M. Winkler, G. Ziv and A. Saran, 1998. Clinical, bacteriological and epidemiological aspects of clinical mastitis in Israeli dairy herds. Prev. Vet. Med., 35: 1-9.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Simojoki, H., T. Orro, S. Taponen and S. Pyorala, 2009. Host response in bovine mastitis experimentally induced with Staphylococcus chromogenes. Vet. Microbiol., 134: 95-99.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sudhan, N.A. and N. Sharma, 2010. Mastitis: An important production disease of dairy animals. 1st Edn., Published by Sarva Manav Vikash Samiti, Gurgoan, India, pp: 72-88.


  • Sumathi, B.R., B.M. Veeregowda and A.R. Gomes, 2008. Prevalence and antibiogram profile of bacterial isolates from clinical bovine mastitis. Vet. World, 1: 237-238.
    Direct Link    


  • Taponen, S., J. Koort, J. Bjorkroth, H. Saloniemi and S. Pyorala, 2007. Bovine intramammary infections caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci may persist throughout lactation according to amplified fragment length polymorphism-based analysis. J. Dairy Sci., 90: 3301-3307.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Taponen, S., H. Simojoki, M. Haveri, H.D. Larsen and S. Pyorala, 2006. Clinical characteristics and persistence of bovine mastitis caused by different species of coagulase-negative staphylococci identified with API or AFLP. Vet. Microbiol., 115: 199-207.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Trinidad, P., S.C. Nickerson and T.K. Alley, 1990. Prevalence of intramammary infection and teat canal colonization in unbred and primigravid dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci., 73: 107-114.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Tenhagen, B.A., G. Koster, J. Wallmann and W. Heuwieser, 2006. Prevalence of mastitis pathogens and their resistance against antimicrobial agents in dairy cows in Brandenburg, Germany. J. Dairy Sci., 89: 2542-2551.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Thorberg, B.M., I. Kuhn, F.M. Aarestrup, B. Brandstrom, P. Jonsson and M.L. Danielsson-Tham, 2006. Pheno- and genotyping of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from bovine milk and human skin. Vet. Microbiol., 115: 163-172.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Thorberg, B.M., M.L. Danielsson-Tham, U. Emanuelson and K.P. Waller, 2009. Bovine subclinical mastitis caused by different types of coagulase-negative staphylococci. J. Dairy Sci., 92: 4962-4970.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tormo, M.A., E. Knecht, F. Gotz, I. Lasa and J.R. Penades, 2005. Bap-dependent biofilm formation by pathogenic species of Staphylococcus: Evidence of horizontal gene transfer? Microbiology, 151: 2465-2475.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Viguier, C., S. Arora, N. Gilmartin, K. Welbeck and R. O'Kennedy, 2009. Mastitis detection: Current trends and future perspectives. Trends Biotechnol., 27: 486-493.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Waller, K.P., A. Aspan, A. Nyman, Y. Persson and U.G. Andersson, 2011. CNS species and antimicrobial resistance in clinical and subclinical bovine mastitis. Vet. Microbiol., 152: 112-116.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Waage, S., T. Mork, A. Roros, D. Aasland, A. Hunshamar and S.A. Odegaard, 1999. Bacteria associated with clinical mastitis in dairy heifers. J. Dairy Sci., 82: 712-719.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Yathiraj, S., M.N. Bhat, B.R. Deepti, H.U. Upendra and A. Murlidhara, 2007. Pattern of bacterial isolates from mastitis cases in cows. ISVM, Uttarakhand, India, Pages: 26.


  • Zadoks, R.N., C. Hulland, B. Belomestnykh and P. Ruegg, 2006. Phenotypic and genotypic identification of Staphylococcus spp. from bovine milk. Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meeting of National Mastitis Council, February 2, 2005, Tampa, FL., pp: 284-285.


  • Zecconi, A., L. Cesaris, E. Liandris, V. Dapra and R. Piccinini, 2006. Role of several Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors on the inflammatory response in bovine mammary gland. Microb. Pathog., 40: 177-183.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Grohn, Y.T., D.J. Wilson, R.N. Gonzalez, J.A. Hertl, H. Schulte, G. Bennett and Y.H. Schukken, 2004. Effect of pathogen-specific clinical mastitis on milk yield in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 87: 3358-3374.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved