Abstract: Background and Objective: Plants are often traditionally used for managing wounds. Angiogenesis is an important event in wound healing. In this study, six traditionally used wound-healing plants from Suriname (South America) have been evaluated for their capacity to stimulate Subintestinal Vessel (SIV) formation in Tg(fli1a: EGFP)y1/+zebrafish embryos. Materials and Methods: Extracts were prepared from Carapa guianensis, Copaifera guyanensis (stembark), Punica granatum (fruit) and Piper betle, Stachytarpheta jamaicensis as well as Uncaria guianensis (leaves). Zebrafish embryos were exposed to the plant e. The P. betle and S. jamaicensis preparations at 100.0 μg mL1 also produced a decrease in SIV lengths of around 50% but killed more than half of the embryos. Conclusion: The traditional xtracts (105 - 100 μg mL1) in Hank’s solution containing dimethyl sulfoxide 0.1% (v/v) from 8 hrs post-fertilization (hpf) in ovo until 96 hpf ex ovo. Total SIV lengths were quantified using the Axiovision 4.8.1 Image Acquisition and Management Software. The numbers of surviving embryos were also recorded. Data were compared to those found with untreated controls (ANOVA, p<0.05). Results: None of the plant extracts produced greater SIV lengths than controls. However, the C. guianensis extract at 0.01 μg mL1 produced a decrease of about 40% in SIV length and left about 70% of the embryos unharmeduse of the plants for wound healing may not involve proangiogenic events. However, the C. guianensis stem bark extract may possess antiangiogenic properties. This may impede wound healing but may be useful against conditions associated with excessive angiogenesis.
INTRODUCTION
A wound is the disruption of the protective function of the skin due to loss of the continuity of the epithelium with or without damage to the underlying connective tissue, following an incision, laceration, abrasion, puncture, avulsion or amputation1. The body responds to a wound by initiating a complex and dynamic cascade of four precisely timed and partially overlapping phases, namely hemostasis, inflammation, proliferation as well as maturation and remodeling2,3. These events involve, among others, the formation of a fibrin clot by the aggregation of thrombocytes, the removal of bacteria and cell debris by white blood cells, the rebuilding of the wounded area with new granulation tissue that is vascularized by the ingrowth of blood vessels and the increase of tensile strength to the wound by newly formed collagen2,3. For a wound to heal successfully, all these events must occur in the proper sequence and time frame2,3.
Minor or acute open wounds such as superficial scratches, needle pricks and shallow cuts may not require medical treatment and sanitization of the wound and removal of any debris to prevent infection generally suffice4. If necessary, topical antibiotics such as polymyxin B, bacitracin, and/or neomycin can be used to fight microbial infections5. On the other hand, severe open wounds with substantial bleeding usually require immediate medical attention involving, among others, stopping the bleeding, cleaning the wound, preventing infection using oral antibiotics and closing and dressing the wound3,6. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs such as naproxen, ibuprofen and diclofenac can be taken during the healing process, although their therapeutic benefit has been disputed7.
In extreme cases, when one or more phases in the healing process fail(s) to proceed correctly, chronic wounds occur8. Chronic wounds are considered wounds that do not heal spontaneously within three months9 and may be caused by, among others, increased formation of toxic free radicals, delayed granulation tissue formation reduced angiogenesis and decreased collagen reorganization9. Examples of such lesions are diabetic, vascular and pressure ulcers and they represent a major burden to patients, their families, health care professionals and health care systems10,11. Treatment of these types of wounds is more complicated and may involve the use of artificial skin substitutes in combination with collagen, protease-modulating matrices such as Promogran®, growth factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor and basic fibroblast growth factor or acellular collagen-based matrices that mimic the extracellular matrix12.
Apart from these allopathic therapies, a variety of plant-based formulae and procedures are traditionally used for managing wounds13,14. The clove basil Ocimum gratissimum L. (Lamiaceae) may promote blood coagulation by shortening the activated partial thromboplastin time15. The sappanwood Biancaea sappan (L. 1753) Tod. 1875 (Fabaceae) exhibits broad antibacterial activity16 and may stimulate proliferation and migration of as well as collagen synthesis by dermal fibroblast17. The frankincense Boswellia sacra Flueck (Burseraceae) may help diminish inflammation, stimulate the growth of granulation tissue18 and reduce the time of wound closure via direct effects on neovascularization19. And the Mongolian milkvetch Astragalus propinquus Schischkin (Fabaceae) may also promote neovascularization20,21 and help remove reactive oxygen species22.
The Republic of Suriname (South America) has an extensive ethnopharmacological tradition23 that has its roots in various traditional forms of medicine originating in parts of the Americas, Africa, Asia and Europe24. As a result, a considerable number of traditional plant-derived preparations is used for managing wounds25-30. The data of Table 1 gives six such plants25-30 as well as the references for the pharmacological support for their presumed wound healing properties. Unfortunately, there is insufficient information on the mechanisms of action of the plants. Considering the importance of neoangiogenesis in the wound healing process2,3, it was decided to assess these plants for their potential to stimulate the formation of new blood vessels.
For this purpose, extracts from the plants have been assessed for their ability to accelerate the formation of Subintestinal Vessels (SIVs) in developing embryos of the transgenic fluorescent Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1/+zebrafish (Danio rerio).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Location and duration of the study: This study on the proangiogenic potential of plants that are used in Suriname for managing wounds has been carried out at the Department of Pharmacology of the Faculty of Medical Sciences, Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname, in the period between May, 2019 and February, 2020.
Plant material: The plants investigated in the current study are mentioned in Table 1. The plants have been selected from literature data on their traditional use for managing wounds25-30 and the pharmacological support for these applications31-44 (Table 1). They have been collected in rural areas of Suriname (Table 2) that had been free from herbicidal or pesticide use for at least the preceding 6 months.
Table 1: Plants investigated in the current study, their most common traditional medical uses in Suriname, as well as the pharmacological support for managing wounds | |||
Plant species (vernacular name) | Family | Most common traditional medical uses in Suriname (references) | Pharmacological support for wound healing stimulating activity |
Carapa guianensis Aubl. (crabwood) | Meliaceae | Various types of wounds25, Disinfection of wounds25,26 | Stimulation healing of incision wounds in alloxan-induced diabetic Wistar rats31 |
Beneficial effects on healing of excision, incision, and dead space wounds in rats32,33 | |||
Punica granatum L. (pomegranate) | Lythraceae | Gingival bleeding27, Sores27 | Stimulation healing of tooth extraction wounds in guinea pigs34 |
Stimulation healing of deep second-degree burn skin wounds in rats35 | |||
Piper betle L. (betel leaf) | Piperaceae | Nose bleeding26,28, Sores and pustules28, Disinfection of wounds28 | Stimulation healing of burn and excision wounds in Swiss mice36 |
Stachytarpheta jamaicensis (L.) | Verbenaceae | Sores25,29, Open wounds29 | Stimulation healing of excision and dead space wounds in diabetic rats37,38 and normal rats39 |
Vahl.(Jamaica vervain) | |||
Uncaria guianensis (Aubl.) | Rubiaceae | Disinfection of wounds25,30, Gingival bleeding30 | Efficacious in osteoarthritis of the knee40, Protection of rats from induced gastritis41 |
J. F. Gmel.(cat's claw) | |||
Copaifera guyanensis Lindl.(hoepelhout) | Fabaceae | Infected wounds25,26, Superficial and deep cuts25,26 | Stimulation wound healing by genus Copaifera in rats42 |
Beneficial effects on healing of wounds in rabbit's ears43 and dorsum of rats44 |
The collections were done in close collaboration with the National Herbarium of Suriname (BBS) which is in the possession of a collection permit from the Department for Nature Conservation from the Surinamese Ministry of Physical Planning, Land and Forestry Management. None of the collected plants was on the International Union for Conservation of Nature’s Red List of endangered or threatened species45. When necessary, free, prior and informed consent had been sought from the indigenous and tribal communities on whose territory the plants were collected46. The collection sites have been determined using a GPSmap® 60CSx receiver (Garmin Ltd., Miami Beach, FL, USA) and have been recorded (Table 2). From all collected plant species, voucher specimens have been prepared which have been assigned a reference number (Table 2) and have been stored at the BBS for future reference.
Drugs and chemicals: Brine shrimp was from Ocean Star International (Salt Lake, UT, USA), Dimethyl Sulfoxide (DMSO) from Mediatech, Inc. (Manassas, VA, USA) and tricaine from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). All other chemicals were from our laboratory stock and were of the highest grade available.
Preparation of plant extracts: The collected plant parts (Table 1 and 2) were first thoroughly washed with tap water, then with distilled water, dried in the open air and extracted as indicated in Table 2. The extracts were filtered, freeze-dried and divided into aliquots of 10 mg that were stored at -20°C. The methods for preparing the plant extracts are approximations of the ways they are made by Surinamese traditional healers.
Zebrafish and maintenance: Adult Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1/+ zebrafish were from Zebrafish International Resource Center (Eugene, OR, USA) and were maintained under standard laboratory conditions using a light schedule of 14 hrs on and 10 hrs off and at a temperature of 28°C47. The fli1 promoter of this transparent and transgenic zebrafish line stimulates the expression of Enhanced Green Fluorescent Protein (EGFP) in the endothelial cells, enabling visualization of blood vessel development throughout embryogenesis48. The fish were fed three times daily with a combination of dry food and freshly hatched brine shrimp47. For experiments, fertilized eggs were harvested shortly after the light was turned on and kept in Hank’s solution (0.137 M NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 0.25 mM Na2HPO4, 0.44 mM KH2PO4, 1.3 mM CaCl2, 1.0 mM MgSO4 and 4.2 mM NaHCO3).
Fig. 1: | Fluorescence microscopic visualization of blood vessels of Tg (fli1a:EGFP)y1/+zebrafish embryo at 96 hpf For all embryos, the length of the subintestinal blood vessels was measured inside the delimited area, underneath the five indicated somites, total subintestinal blood vessel length was expressed in μm |
Table 2: Collection sites, herbarium voucher numbers, parts used and methods of processing of the plants investigated in the current study | ||||
Plant species | Collection site | Herbarium voucher number | Plant part used | Method of processing |
C. guianensis | Brokopondo district (21N 0712666, 0582200) | UVS 18.499 | Stembark | Maceration and extraction for 2 hrs with petroleum ether |
P. granatum | Nickerie district (21N 0507685, 0652131) | UVS 18.494 | Fruit | Maceration and filtration |
P. betle | Wanica district (21N 0674859, 0648865) | UVS 18.495 | Leaf | Maceration and extraction for 1 h with distilled water at 100°C |
S. jamaicensis | Paramaribo district (21N 0680139, 0673271) | UVS 18.496 | Leaf | Maceration and extraction for 1 h with distilled water at 45°C |
U. guianensis | (Para district (21N 0689695, 0635638) | UVS 18.497 | Leaf | Maceration and extraction for 2 hrs with distilled water at 100°C |
C. guyanensis | Brokopondo district (21N 0712913, 0581341) | UVS 18.498 | Stembark | Maceration and extraction for 2 hrs with petroleum ether |
All reference vouchers have been stored at the National Herbarium of Suriname (BBS) at the Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname (UvS: Universiteit van Suriname) |
All reference vouchers have been stored at the National Herbarium of Suriname (BBS) at the Anton de Kom University of Suriname, Paramaribo, Suriname (UvS: Universiteit van Suriname)
Assessment of effects of plant extracts on total subintestinal vessel length in and survival of Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1/+zebrafish embryos: At 8 hrs post-fertilization (hpf), eggs from the Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1/+ zebrafish were harvested and exposed to serial dilutions of the plant extracts between 105 and 100 μg mL1 dissolved in Hank’s solution containing DMSO 0.1% (v/v). Eggs exposed to medium alone served as controls. The incubations took place at a temperature of 28.2°C and a minimum relative humidity of 95%47. At 30 hpf, the hatched embryos49 were carefully removed from the chorion under a Stemi 2000-C stereomicroscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and using pincers and allowed to swim freely in fresh plant extract-containing medium or fresh medium alone. The media were refreshed at 48 and 72 hpf. The experiments were terminated at 96 hpf, because SIVs partially degenerate after this period49,50.
At the end of the experiments, the embryos were anaesthetized by transferring them to a medium containing tricaine 150 mg L1 49, after which their SIVs were visualized under an Axiovert 40 CFL fluorescence microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and photographed. All photographs were from the five upper somites and have been taken from embryos placed in the same position51 (Fig. 1). Total subintestinal vessel lengths were determined with the Axiovision 4.8.1 Image Acquisition and Management Software for Light Microscopy (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) and were in μm48. The numbers of embryos surviving under the various conditions were also recorded.
Data processing and statistics: Total SIV lengths in zebrafish embryos that had been exposed to a plant extract were expressed relative to those found for untreated controls. Similarly, numbers of surviving embryos at 96 hpf after exposure to a plant extract were expressed to that of untreated controls surviving at that time point. All experiments have been carried out at least three times in triplicate.
Table 3: | Mean subintestinal blood vessel length (±SDs) in Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1/+zebrafish embryos at 96 hpf after treatment with the plant extracts relative to that found for untreated controls |
Mean relative subintestinal blood vessel lengths (expressed in % of control values) of zebrafish embryos at 96 hpf at plant extract concentrations | ||||||||
Concentration (μg mL1) | ||||||||
Plant varieties | 0.00001 |
0.0001 |
0.001 |
0.01 |
0.1 |
1.0 |
10.0 |
100.0 |
C. guianensis | 110±52 |
91±40 |
86±53 |
58±35* |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
P. granatum | N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
98±41 |
86±42 |
91±51 |
79±52 |
P. betle | N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
100±36 |
93±48 |
76±42 |
40±33 |
S. jamaicensis | N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
86±51 |
89±44 |
77±52 |
50±38 |
U. guianensis | N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
97±39 |
87±43 |
79±45 |
67±55 |
C. guyanensis | 98±36 |
102±31 |
118±34 |
104±55 |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
*Statistically significantly different from untreated controls (p = 0.001, one-way ANOVA), Data are in percentages and have been expressed to that of the controls which were set at 100%, N.d.: Not done |
Table 4: Mean percentage of Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1/+ zebrafish embryos surviving at 96 hpf after treatment with the plant extracts relative to that found for untreated controls | ||||||||
Mean percentage of zebrafish embryos surviving at 96 hpf (expressed in % of control values) at plant extract concentrations | ||||||||
Concentration (μg mL1) | ||||||||
Plant varieties | 0.00001 |
0.0001 |
0.001 |
0.01 |
0.1 |
1.0 |
10.0 |
100.0 |
C. guianensis | 97±12 |
89±9 |
81±21 |
71±29 |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
P. granatum | N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
92±13 |
92±16 |
80±32 |
62±22 |
P. betle | N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
81±14 |
78±23 |
65±25 |
33±23 |
S. jamaicensis | N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
90±14 |
81±12 |
73±18 |
41±17 |
U. guianensis | N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
85±21 |
84±16 |
68±34 |
55±20 |
C. guyanensis | 84±17 |
85±17 |
85±11 |
81±17 |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
N.d. |
Latter value was set at 100%, N.d.: Not done |
Results are Means±SDs and are given in Table 3 and 4. The p-values ≤0.05 were taken to indicate statistically significant differences according to one-way ANOVA.
RESULTS
Effects of plant extracts on subintestinal vessel length of zebrafish embryos: Six extracts from plant species that are popularly used for treating wounds have been evaluated for their capacity to stimulate the formation of SIVs in developing Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1/+ zebrafish embryos at 96 hpf. The rationale for this study was based on the importance of new blood vessel formation to the process of wound healing.
Table 3 gives the total SIV length of Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1/+ zebrafish embryos at 96 hpf after exposure to the plant extracts. The total SIV length of the untreated controls at that time point was on average about 1,400 μm. None of the six plant extracts produced at any of the concentrations tested a statistically significantly greater total SIV length when compared to that of the untreated controls. This suggests that none of the plant extracts stimulated blood vessel formation in the zebrafish embryos and that none of them elicited proangiogenic activities under the experimental conditions applied in the current study.
However, total SIV length in embryos treated with the C. guianensis extract at 0.01 μg mL1 was 58±35%, which was statistically significantly different from control values that were set at 100% (p = 0.001, one-way ANOVA) (Table 3). This difference is illustrated in Fig. 2 which clearly shows the difference in SIV length in arbitrarily selected control fish (Fig. 2a, about 1,568 μm) and that in fish treated with the C. guianensis extract 0.01 μg mL1 (Fig. 2b, about 476 μm). Total SIV lengths in embryos exposed to the P. betle or S. jamaicensis extract at 100.0 μg mL1 were also less (about 60 and 50%, respectively) when compared to those of the controls.
Effects of plant extracts on the survival of zebrafish embryos: Assessment of the numbers of zebrafish embryos surviving at 96 hpf after exposure to the plant extracts indicated that the C. guianensis extract had relatively little effect on the viability of the zebrafish embryos, leaving 71±29% of them unharmed at the concentration of 0.01 μg mL1 (Table 4). This suggests that this preparation may have exerted antiangiogenic effects in the current study. However, the use of the P. betle or the S. jamaicensis extract at 100.0 μg mL1 led to only 33±23 and 41±17%, respectively, of the zebrafish embryos surviving when compared to the controls (Table 4). This strongly suggests that the effects of these plant extracts on SIV lengths were attributable to general toxicity rather than to an antiangiogenic effect as inferred for the C. guianensis extract.
Fig. 2a-b: | Fluorescence microscopic visualization of blood vessels of Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1/+ zebrafish embryo at 96 hpf in control fish (a) and in fish treated with the C. guianensis extract 0.01 μg mL1 (b) Total subintestinal blood vessel lengths in these arbitrarily selected control and C. guianensis extract-treated embryos were about 1,568 μm and 476 μm, respectively |
DISCUSSION
Neoangiogenesis is an important phase in the process of wound healing2,3. In this study, preparations from six medicinal plants that are traditionally used in Suriname for managing wounds25-30, have been evaluated for their potential to stimulate angiogenesis. To this end, the plant extracts have been assessed for their stimulatory effects on total SIV length in developing Tg(fli1a:EGFP)y1/+ zebrafish embryos. The plants and plant parts investigated were the stem bark from C. guianensis and C. guyanensis, the fruit from P. granatum as well as the leaves from P. betle, S. jamaicensis and U. guianensis. Preparations from C. guianensis seed oil and leaf stimulated wound healing in rodent models31-33 as did the oleoresin from the bark of various Copaifera members42-44. The same held for the P. granatum fruit juice34,35 as well as the leaf extracts from P. betle36 and S. jamaicensis37-39, while U. guianensis leaf preparations were efficacious in osteoarthritis of the knee40 and protected rats from induced gastritis41. Together, these data suggest that these plants possess wound healing stimulating activities that may be associated with angiogenesis. However, the use of none of the preparations from the plant parts led to a greater SIV length in the zebrafish embryos, suggesting that none of them exhibited proangiogenic properties under the experimental conditions applied. However, exposure of the fish to the C. guianensis extract led to a lower total SIV length when compared to untreated controls, suggesting that this preparation possessed antiangiogenic properties.
The apparent antiangiogenic effect of the C. guianensis stem bark extract is at variance with the previously reported proangiogenic activities of andiroba oil prepared from the seed of the plant. Given by oral gavage, the oil stimulated angiogenesis along with fibroblast proliferation and other parameters of healing in open wounds in the cecum of Wistar rats52. The stimulation of wound healing by topically applied andiroba oil in alloxan-induced diabetic rats was accompanied by the promotion of neovascularization31. The use of a topical commercial emulsion containing andiroba oil (called Tegum®) led to the improvement of the healing of and upregulation of transforming growth factor β3 levels as well as an increase in the number of capillaries reactive to factor VIII-related antigen in full-thickness cutaneous wounds in Wistar rats53. Notably, in addition to the seed oil31, extracts from the leaves32 but also those from the stembark33 stimulated wound healing in laboratory rats.
These data support that C. guianensis possesses proangiogenic properties and make it difficult to explain the clear antiangiogenic effect observed in the current study. As explained in critical analyses of the antiangiogenic properties of plant-derived substances54 and commonly used angiogenesis assays55, differences in extraction procedure and laboratory model may produce substantially different outcomes. This may even involve opposite effects on the degree of blood vessel formation although the test compounds may elicit comparable wound healing-stimulating effects54,55. In the current study, C. guianensis stem bark was extracted with petroleum ether and the highly lipophilic fraction obtained was given to zebrafish embryos for absorption through the skin. On the other hand, in one of the previous studies33, the stembark was extracted with water and the typically hydrophilic fraction obtained was orally administered to rats. Thus, the discrepancy between the current results and that described in the literature33 may be attributed, at least in part, to differences in extraction conditions, chemical nature of the test compounds, administration route and/or laboratory model. This supposition must be verified in future studies. This is particularly important since the use of an antiangiogenic compound can impede proper wound healing, although such a compound may have merit in diseases associated with excessive blood vessel formation.
Comparable considerations may account for the discrepancies between the current results with the P. granatum, P. betle and S. jamaicensis preparations on the one hand and data reported in the literature on the other hand. Incidentally, the literature data were also not consistent with each other. Thus, P. granatum juice did not affect total zebrafish embryo SIV length in the current study but stimulated healing as well as Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Platelet-derived Growth Factor (PDGF) expression in tooth extraction wounds in guinea pigs34, suggesting that it possessed proangiogenic properties. On the other hand, P. granatum fruit juice, fruit extract, a polyphenol fraction from the fermented fruit juice or punicalagin, an antioxidant ellagitannin in pomegranate juice, exerted antiangiogenic effects in several human carcinoma cell lines as well as human umbilical vein endothelial cells56,57, chick chorioallantoic membrane assays56,58,59 and tumour xenograft-mouse models60-62.
A methanol extract from P. betle leaf stimulated the proliferation of fibroblasts in a scratch-wound healing assay36, hinting that it possessed proangiogenic properties. In contrast, the phenolic compound eugenol that is abundantly present in P. betle leaf exhibited chemopreventive63 and antiangiogenic activities in Wistar rats with N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine-induced gastric cancer64. Importantly, the antiangiogenic activity of eugenol might be mediated by interference with VEGF levels and VEGF-receptor-1 expression64. And S. jamaicensis leaf preparations stimulated wound healing in diabetic and normal laboratory rats37-39 but elicited an antiangiogenic effect in a chick chorioallantoic membrane assay65. The disagreements between these observations on the one hand and the lack of an effect of the P. betle and the S. jamaicensis extracts in the current study, on the other hand, may also be attributable to differences in experimental conditions54,55. This also must be confirmed in additional studies.
To our knowledge, there are no studies on the effects of U. guianensis leaf and C. guyanensis stembark preparations on blood vessel formation. However, a hydroalcoholic extract from the stembark of Uncaria tomentosa (Willd. ex Schult.) DC. increased the expression of cytokines such as IFN-γ that downregulated angiogenesis in endothelial cells66 and reduced staining for Factor VIII in subcutaneously injected B16-BL6 murine melanoma cells in C57BL/6 mice67. On the other hand, an ointment containing 10% copaiba oil from the stembark of Copaifera langsdorffii Desf. Kuntze stimulated angiogenesis and accelerated the viability of random skin flaps in laboratory rats68, while creams prepared from either the oleoresin from C. langsdorffii stembark or a hydroalcoholic extract from the leaf of this plant promoted angiogenesis as well as reepithelialization, wound retraction and remodelling in skin wounds in Wistar rats69. These observations suggest that Uncaria preparations may possess antiangiogenic properties and that those from Copaifera preparations may have proangiogenic characteristics. These dissimilarities with the current study where no effects on blood vessel formation were observed, may also tentatively be explained by differences in experimental conditions54,55 but this also remains to be determined.
Summarizing, the results from this study suggest that preparations from C. guianensis, C. guyanensis, P. granatum, P. betle, S. jamaicensis and U. guianensis do not possess proangiogenic properties. This suggests that the traditional claims of wound healing activities of these plants may not be associated with proangiogenic events. The apparent antiangiogenic properties of the C. guianensis extract may even contraindicate its use for wound healing but may make it useful against conditions associated with excessive angiogenesis. However, these conclusions must be regarded with some caution. The developing zebrafish embryos used in the current study have mainly absorbed the plant extracts through their skin instead, which might have led to relatively high and potentially toxic concentrations in their entire body. This might well have perturbed organogenesis including the development of the circulatory system70. This may be of particular relevance to zebrafish embryos which are reportedly much more susceptible to potentially toxic compounds when compared to adult zebrafish and other in vivo models of angiogenesis71. These considerations underscore the need for multiple model systems to evaluate compounds for their potential effect on angiogenesis. Until these additional studies have been carried out, the traditional use of the plants for managing wounds should be discouraged.
CONCLUSION
The results from this study suggest that the traditional use of preparations from C. guianensis and C. guyanensis stembark, P. granatum fruit as well as P. betle, S. jamaicensis and U. guianensis leaf for wound healing cannot be explained by proangiogenic effects in the wound area. The extract of C. guianensis stembark may even possess antiangiogenic properties, suggesting that it may have merit in conditions associated with excessive angiogenesis. The presumed wound healing-stimulating activities of the plants may be attributable to (a) mechanism(s) other than the promotion of blood vessel formation. These possibilities should be investigated in comprehensive studies using various in vitro and in vivo models.
SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT
Many conditions are treated with plant-derived traditional medicines, often without sufficient evidence for clinical efficacy. This may lead to the use of inefficacious or even unsafe medications. Nevertheless, further evaluation of these is warranted, not only to establish their medicinal usefulness but also to explore unforeseen applications.