HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Research Journal of Immunology

Year: 2011 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 31-37
DOI: 10.3923/rji.2011.31.37
Probiotic Action of Lactobacillus Isolated from the Milk Sample against Some Human Pathogens
M. Premalatha and P. Dhasarathan

Abstract: Probiotic efficiency of lactobacillus strains was isolated from milk sample and their antibacterial activities against human bacterial pathogens were screened in the present study. The milk samples were collected in sterile containers from different places of Tamil Nadu, India. The samples were analysed qualitatively and microbiologically. Lactobacillus was isolated from the milk samples and it was identified by biochemical tests. Methylene blue reduction test, which is colour sensitive to oxygen concentration is added to the milk. Resazurin test used to screen milk quality based either on the colour production. The total bacterial population count of milk sample was enumerated by Pour plate technique. MRS agar plates were prepared and a loopful of milk sample is taken. Quadrant streak procedure was carried out to isolate Lactobacillus. The isolated strains are identified and used to study their antagonistic efficiency against human bacterial pathogens isolated from different pathologic medium from patients diagnosed to have various wound infection at the laboratory Joys, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari (district) Tamilnadu. The probiotic action of Lactobacillus was studied against some human pathogens like Eschericia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter aerogenes, Streptococcus pyogenes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Salmonella typhimurium and it was observed that Lactobacillus showed good antagonistic effect against these pathogens.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
M. Premalatha and P. Dhasarathan, 2011. Probiotic Action of Lactobacillus Isolated from the Milk Sample against Some Human Pathogens. Research Journal of Immunology, 4: 31-37.

Keywords: Lactobacillus, probiotics, immunity, bacteriostatic and bactericidal and human bacterial pathogens

INTRODUCTION

Probiotic cultures have been associated historically with cultured of milks and dairy products, from which there is substantial evidence for positive effects on human health and general well-being (Klaenhammer, 2000; Reuter, 2001). Several in vitro and in vivo experiments on antagonism of different lactobacillus strains against Helicobacter pylori and Clostridium difficile, Campylobacter jejuni, E. coli were performed by Nowroozi et al. (2004). All tested human lactobacillus strains were able to inhibit the growth of all strains of anaerobic human gastrointestinal pathogens (Strus et al., 2001).

Milk is an excellent culture media for many kinds of microbes. Milk is normally sterile before it is drawn from the cow. It is contaminated by the microorganisms, which are introduced from the udder during handling. Raw milk from a healthy cow has Streptococcus, Lactococcus and other lactic acid producing bacteria. The gastrointestinal tract of vertebrate animals is the most densely colonized region of the human body with approximately 1012 bacteria in the large intestine (Tannode, 1995). The ingested bacteria which are present in milk could have positive influence on the normal microflora of the intestinal tract (Nowroozi et al., 2004). The ingestion of probiotic foods stimulate cytokinin production (Lemonier, 1996), decrease faecal mutagenecity (Salminena et al., 1998a) and enhance lactose digestion (Sanders, 2000). He hypothesized that the lactobacilli were important for human health and promote the formation of yoghurt and other fermented foods which are good for health. Hence, the present study investigated probitic and antibacterial activity of lactobacillus strains isolated from milk samples.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Collection of milk samples: Raw milk samples were collected duration of February-April, 2010 at different places (Nagercoil, Thuckalay, Martandam, Rajakkamangalam and kulasekharam) of Tamilnadu and maintained aseptic conditions. The samples were brought to the Departmrnt of Biotechnology, Prathyusha Institute of Technology and Management, Thiruvallur, Tamilnadu, India for qualitative tests and microbial analysis.

Standard qualitative analysis
Methylene blue reduction test: In this test, methylene blue, which is color sensitive to oxygen concentration, is added to the milk. The indicator is blue in color in the oxidized state and white in reduced condition. The speed of color disappearance of methylene blue, which is proportional to the number of bacteria present, is taken as an indication of the bacterial load (Gibbs, 1974).

Resazurin test: In this test the quality was judged based either on the color produced after a particular period of incubation or on the time required to reduce the dye to a given end point (Nixon and Lamb, 1945).

Enumeration of total bacterial population: The total bacterial population count of milk sample was enumerated by Pour plate technique. The test sample was mixed with known volume of sterilized distilled water to make serial dilutions. After serial dilution with precaution, 1 mL of aliquots of appropriate dilutions of the sample was pipette out into sterile Petri dishes and 15 to 20 mL of sterile nutrient agar medium were poured. The medium and the inoculums were thoroughly mixed using turntable and the medium was allowed to solidify. Duplicate plates were also maintained. The numbers of bacterial colonies were counted after 48 h of incubation. The bacterial populations were expressed as number of Colony Forming Units (CFU) per gram samples analyzed.

Isolation of Lactobacillus from the milk sample: MRS agar (de Man, Rogosa and Sharpe agar) plates were prepared and a loopful of milk sample is taken. Quadrant streak procedure was carried out to isolate Lactobacillus as per Shalini Aggarwal (2006) method.

Antagonistic effect of Lactobacillus against some human pathogens: This is done by using Agar plate disc diffusion method. Filter paper disc diffusion technique in agar was employed for determining antimicrobial activity. Whatman No.1 filter paper discs of 6 mm diameter, placed in dry Petri plates, were autoclaved. The test sample in measured quantities was dissolved in minimum amount of acetone. Sterile filter paper No.1 discs were loaded with the sample. The 20 μL of test sample loaded in disc for screen antagonistic effect against selected pathogens.

Fig. 1: Qualitative analysis of milk samples by MB reduction test

Fig. 2: Enumeration of total bacterial population in the milk samples collected from different locations

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Standard qualitative analysis of the milk samples from different places: Qualitative analysis of the milk sample was identified by dye reduction test. Quality of milk was analysed by organoleptic analysis. Good quality of milk is graded in 500 followed by poor qulaity graded upto 0 based on the quality. Sample collected from Nagercoil were very poor in Quality. The quality of milk sample collected from Rajakkamangalam and kulasekharam were better than the above. Sample collected from Thuckalay and Martandam was found to be poor (Fig. 1).

Enumeration of total bacterial population: Samples collected from Nagercoil contained 1.88x105 CFU mL-1. Samples collected from Rajakkamangalam and kulasekharam contained less number of colonies i e., 1.53 and 1.47x103 mL-1. Samples collected from Thuckalay and Martandam contained the 1.10 and 1.01x102 CFU mL-1 of microorganisms (Fig. 2).

Bacterial colonization of the intestine undergoes changes depending on age. From the present study we are anlysed efficiecncy of Lactobacillus in adult animals, it helps to improve immunity. But in childhood stage, it affects intestinal lamina it leads to suppress immunity. Bacterial colonization in early stage people is influenced by local immunity, bacterial fixation factors and the phenomenon of colonization resistance (Tournut, 1993).

Table 1: Antagonistic effects of Lactobacillus against some human pathogens

Also present study supported by Jiang et al. (2001) bacterial strains from the neonatal period are replaced during the life by other bacterial strains characteristic of particular specimens and host. During the first days after birth qualitative and quantitative changes in the composition of the intestinal microflora are observed. At the time of weaning, lactic acid bacteria and coliforms are replaced by obligatory anaerobes (Berg, 1996).

Isolation of Lactobacillus from the milk sample by using selective media: Lactobacillus sp. was isolated from the milk samples by streak plate technique on MRS agar plates.

Identification of Lactobacillus: Lactobacillus was found to be Gram positive, catalase negative, motile, anaerobic organism. It was able to ferment carbohydrate to yield acid and gas. Lactobacillus cannot produce indole and it cannot utilize citrate but it can utilize lactose.

Antagonistic effect of Lactobacillus against some human pathogens: Using pathogens like Escherichia coli, Shigella sp., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella typhimurium carried out the antagonism experiment. Growth inhibition of the test organism by Lactobacillus was also notices. Lactobacillus exhibited maximum inhibitory activity against Shigella by forming a zone of inhibition 18 mm. Next to this, Lactobacillus illustrated maximum inhibitory activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by forming a zone of inhibition 17 mm. Against Salmonella typhimurium it formed a zone of inhibition of 16 mm. Against Staphylococcus aureus, it formed a zone of inhibition of 12 mm. Least inhibitory activity was observed by Lactobacillus against Eschericia coli (7 mm). No inhibitory zone was formed by Lactobacillus against Klebsiella pneumonia (Table 1).

Pathogenic bacteria use different mechanisms to infect the gut. The two most important are adher-ence to the mucous membrane and the production of toxins. From the result Lactobacillus strains are help ful to eliminate predominant level of pahtogens (Hoepelman and Tuomanen, 1992). Several workers suggested not all pathogens are eliminated by mucous immune mechanisms because of their high binding affinity to surface glycoproteins, or glycolipids of the epithelial cells (Hook and Switalski, 1992; Svanborg, 1994; Forouhandeh et al., 2010). The specific antibody-secreting lymphocytes appear in peripheral blood 2-4 days after antigen exposure, reach a maximum concentration after 6-8 days and persist in the blood for 2-3 weeks. Studies illustrate that these cells can reside in the gut. Homing receptors on lymphocytes, which interact with legends on endothelial cells, target the migration of lymphocytes into tissues (Salminen et al., 1998b; Quiding-Jarbrink et al., 1995). Antigen-specific systemic suppression after oral antigen introduction can be seen after 1-2 days and oral tolerance to systemic challenge becomes established within 5-7 days (Kantele et al., 1996). Data suggest that interactions of lymphocytes with the intestinal epithelium are perhaps more important than what was realized previously (Strobel and Mowat, 1998; Ghafoor et al., 2005).

Early exposure of the intestine to live micro-organisms and bacterial colonisation together with dietary antigens is very important for the development of the gut barrier (Helgeland et al., 1996; Sudo et al., 1997). Microflora boosts the barrier development through an increase in the duodenal Ig A plasmocyte population (Moreau et al., 1978). It increases the number of enteroendocrine cells in the epithelium of the jejunum and colon, which enhances production of secretory IgA and mucus (Sharma and Schumacher, 1995).

Different mechanisms could influence the composition of the micro-organisms that colonise the digestive tract. The two important are: Antagonism among bacteria and local immunity (Osuntoki et al., 2008). Disturbances in the ecological balance in the gut lead to the growth of harmful bacteria and to their possible translocation to internal organs, which induce disease. The intestinal microflora contributes to the processing of food antigens in the gut. Certain bacterial species isolated from the gastrointestinal microflora can liberate low-molecular-weight peptides, which trigger immune responses. Probiotic bacteria-derived proteases can degrade cow milk casein and thereby generate peptides with suppressive effects on the lymphocyte proliferation in healthy individuals (Kaila et al., 1992; Murry et al., 2004). To further characterize the immunomodulatory effect of probiotics, a study was designed to investigate whether caseins degraded by probiotic bacteria-derived enzymes could modulate the cytokine production with anti-CD3 antibody-induced, peripheral blood mononuclear cells in atopic infants with cow milk allergy (Perdigon et al., 1998). Without hydrolyzation, casein increased the production of interleukin 4 in cultures from patients with atopic dermatitis, whereas L. rhamnosus GG-hydrolyzed casein reduced the production of interleukin 4. These results indicate that probiotics modify the structure of potentially harmful antigens and thereby alter the mode of their immunogenicity (Trachoo and Boudreaux, 2006).

CONCLUSION

Beneficially acting bacteria positively influence the immune system of the host. The protection of the mucous membranes is ensured through local immunity defense mechanisms. Their development is dependent on the direct contact of the host with antigens from the outside environment. The indigenous microflora joins in immune exclusion and protects the host from the adhesion of pathogens through competition for substrates and places of adhesion. These bacteria produce antibacterial substances and they stimulate the production of specific antibodies.

REFERENCES

  • Klaenhammer, T.R., 2000. Probiotic bacteria: Today and tomorrow. J. Nutr., 130: 415S-416S.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Reuter, G., 2001. Probiotics-Possibilities and limitations of their application in food, animal feed and in pharmaceutical preparations for men and animals. Berl. Munch. Tierarztl. Wochenschr., 114: 410-419.
    PubMed    


  • Strus, M., K. Pakosz, H. Gosciniak, A. Przondo-Mordarska and E. Rozynek et al., 2001. Anatgonistic activity of Lactobacillus bacteria strains against anaerobic gastrointestinal tract pathogens (Helicobacter pylori, Compylobacter coli, Campylobacter jejuni, Clostridium difficile). Med. Doew. Mikrobiol., 53: 133-142.
    PubMed    


  • Nowroozi, J., M. Mirzaii and M. Norouzi, 2004. Study of Lactobacillus as probiotic bacteria. Iran. J. Public Health, 33: 1-7.
    Direct Link    


  • Ghafoor, A., S. Naseem, M. Younus and J. Nazir, 2005. Immunomodulatory effect of multistrain probiotics (ProtexinTM) on broiler chicken vaccinated against avaian influenza virus (H9). Int. J. Poult. Sci., 4: 777-780.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Forouhandeh, H., S.Z. Vahed, M.S. Hejazi, M.R. Nahaei and M.A. Dibavar, 2010. Isolation and phenotypic characterization of Lactobacillus species from various dairy products. Curr. Res. Bacteriol., 3: 84-88.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kaila, M., E. Isolauri, E. Soppi, E. Virtanen, S. Laine and H. Arvilommi, 1992. Enhancement of the circulating antibody secreting cell response in human diarrhea by a human Lactobacillus strain. Pediatr. Res., 32: 141-144.
    PubMed    


  • Kantele, J.M., H. Arvilommi, S. Kontiainen, M. Salmi and S. Jalkanen et al., 1996. Mucosally activated circulating human B-cells in diarrhea express homing receptors directing them back to the gut. Gastroenterology, 110: 1061-1067.
    PubMed    


  • Murry, A.C., A. Hinton and H. Morrision, 2004. Inhibition of growth of Eschericia coli, Salmonella typhimureum, Clostridia perfrigens on chicken feed media by Lactobacillus salivarius and Lactobacillus plantarum. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 3: 603-607.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Osuntoki, A.B., O.R. Ejide and E.A. Omonigbehin, 2008. Antagnonistic effects on entropathogens and plasmid analysis of Lactobacillus isolated from dairy products. Biotechnology, 7: 311-316.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Perdigon, G., M.E. de Macias, S. Alvarez, G. Oliver and A.P. de Ruiz Holgado, 1998. Systemic augmentation of the immune response in mice by feeding fermented milks with Lactobacillus casei and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Immunology, 63: 17-23.
    PubMed    


  • Quiding-Jarbrink, M., M. Lakew, I. Nordstrom, J. Banchereau, E. Butcher, J. Holmgren and C. Czerkinsky, 1995. Human circulating specific antibody-forming cells after systemic and mucosal immunizations: Differential homing commitments and cell surface differentiation markers. Eur. J. Immunol., 25: 322-327.
    PubMed    


  • Strobel, S. and A.M. Mowat, 1998. Immune responses to dietary antigens: Oral tolerance. Immunol. Today, 19: 173-181.
    Direct Link    


  • Berg, R.D., 1996. The indigenous gastrointestinal mi-croflora. Trends Microbiol., 4: 430-435.
    CrossRef    


  • Helgeland, L., J.T. Vaaga, B. Rolstad, T. Midvedt and P. Brandtzead, 1996. Microbial colonisation influ-ences composition and T-cell receptor V beta reper-toire of intraepithelial lymphocytes in rat intestine. Immunol., 89: 494-501.
    Direct Link    


  • Hoepelman, A.I. and E.I. Tuomanen, 1992. Consequences of microbial attachment: Directing host cell functions with adhesins. Infect Immun., 60: 1729-1733.
    Direct Link    


  • Hook, M. and L. Switalski, 1992. Microbial Adhesion and Invasion. Springer Verlag, New York


  • Jiang, H.Q., N.A. Bos and J.J. Cebra, 2001. Timing, lo-calization and persistence of colonisation by segmented filamentous bacteria in the neonatal mouse gut depend on immune status of mothers and pups. Infect Immun., 69: 3611-3617.
    CrossRef    


  • Lemonier, L., 1996. Microbial ecology of gastrointestinal tract. Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 31: 107-133.


  • Moreau, M.C., R. Ducluzeau, D. Guy-Grand and M.C. Muller, 1978. Increase in the population of duodenal immunoglobulin a plasmocytes in axenic mice associ-ated with different living or dead bacterial strain of intestinalorigin. Infect Immun., 21: 532-539.
    PubMed    


  • Salminen, S., M. Deighton, Y. Berno and S.L. Gorbach, 1998. Lactic acid bacteria in health and disease. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 65: 3763-3766.


  • Sanders, 2000. Introduction of human cytokines by bacteria used in diary foods. Nutr. Res., 13: 1127-1140.


  • Sharma, R. and U. Schumacher, 1995. Morphometric analysis of intestinal mucins under different dietary conditions and gut flora in rats. Dig. Dis. Sci., 40: 2532-2539.
    CrossRef    


  • Sudo, N., S.A. Sawamura, K. Tanakai, Y. Aiba, C. Kubo and Y. Koga, 1997. The requirement of intestinal bacterial flora for the development of an IdE production system fully susceptible to oral tolerance induction. J. Immunol., 157: 1739-1745.


  • Svanborg, C., 1994. Bacterial Adherence and Mucosal Immunity. In: Hand-book of Mucosal Immunology, Ogra, P.L., J. Mestecky, M.E. Lamm, W. Strober, J.R. McGhee and J. Bienestock (Eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, New York, pp: 71-78


  • Tannode, 1995. Normal Microflora. Chapman and Hall, London, UK


  • Tournut, J., 1993. The digestive flora of the pig and its variations. Rec. Med. Vet., 169: 645-652.


  • Gibbs, W.N., 1974. The methylene blue reduction test: Evaluation of a screening method for glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase deficiency. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg., 23: 1197-1202.
    Direct Link    


  • Nixon, M.C. and A.B. Lamb, 1945. Resazurin test for grading raw milk. Can. J. Comp. Med. Vet. Sci., 9: 18-23.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Aggarwal, S., 2006. Isolation and characterization of starch: Degrading lactic acid bacteria. M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Biotechnology and Env. Sciences, Thapar Institute of Engg. and Technology, Deemed University.


  • Trachoo, N. and C. Boudreaux, 2006. Therapeutic properties of probiotic bacteria. J. Biol. Sci., 6: 202-208.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Salminen, S., C. Bouley, M.C. Boutron, J.H. Cummings and A. Franck et al., 1998. Functional food science and gastrointestinal physiology and function. Br. J. Nutr., 80: S147-S171.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved