HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Research Journal of Environmental Toxicology

Year: 2016 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 144-151
DOI: 10.3923/rjet.2016.144.151
Effect of Chromium (Vi) Reducing Bacillus species PZ3 on the Growth of Pea Plants in Chromium Amended Soil
Parvaze Ahmad Wani and Ibrahim Odunola Zainab

Abstract: Use of Cr (VI) in various industries like leather, tanning, metallurgy, electroplating, textile and pigment manufacturing may lead to the contamination of the environment with Cr (VI). Aim of this study is to check the bacterial species for their tolerance towards multiple metals, antibiotics, plant growth promoting activity, Cr (VI) reducing activity and to further check its effect on pea growth in Cr (VI) contaminated soil. Bacterial strains were isolated from metal contaminated soils of Abeokuta, Ogun State, Nigeria. All of the isolates showed tolerance to lead, zinc and chromium (VI). All bacterial species were positive to ammonia, Bacillus PZ3 and Treptococcus spp. PZ4 were positive to HCN. Bacterial strains also showed reduction of chromium (VI) under varying pH and chromium concentration. Maximum reduction (87.5%) of chromium (VI) was observed at pH 7 by Bacillus PZ3. Chromium (VI) was also reduced significantly at pH 5, 6, 8 and 9. The PGPR strain PZ3 reduced chromium (VI) at a concentration of 50 μg Cr/mL (47.5%), 100 μg Cr/mL (87.5%) and 150 μg Cr/mL (133.33%). Chromium reducing Bacillus PZ3 when inoculated in chromium amended soil increased the growth, nodulation, leghaemoglobin, chlorophyll and protein content of pea plant in comparison to control plants.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Parvaze Ahmad Wani and Ibrahim Odunola Zainab, 2016. Effect of Chromium (Vi) Reducing Bacillus species PZ3 on the Growth of Pea Plants in Chromium Amended Soil. Research Journal of Environmental Toxicology, 10: 144-151.

Keywords: chromium (VI) reduction, metal tolerance, Bacillus species, plant growth promoting activities and pea growth

INTRODUCTION

Release of chromium waste in the environment is due to the use of toxic chromium in various industries like leather tanning, metallurgy, electroplating, textile and pigment manufacturing (Sultan and Hasnain, 2007). Chromium occurs either in trivalent or hexavalent form which can cause negative effect on the population of various types of microbes present in the soil (Ortegel et al., 2002). Hexavalent chromium is more toxic and carcinogenic than trivalent due to its permeability through biological membranes. When Cr (VI) is taken up by the bacterial cell, interacts with proteins and nucleic acids, leads to the damage to these molecules inside the bacterial cell (Ackerley et al., 2006). Reduction of Cr (VI) results in the formation of stables, less soluble and less toxic Cr (III) and is thus an important process for the transformation of Cr (VI) contaminated soil environments (Jeyasingh and Phillip, 2005). The microbial transformation of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) is a cheap and environment friendly technique which protects the soil system from metal toxicity. The microbial detoxification of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) has been studied in Bacillus (Elangovan et al., 2006; Chaturvedi, 2011), Pseudomonas sp. (Wani and Ayoola, 2015; Rahman et al., 2007), Escherichia coli (Bae et al., 2005), Microbacterium, Ochrobactrum intermedium (Faisal and Hasnain, 2005) and Micrococcus (Sultan and Hasnain, 2005).

Reduction of Cr (VI) is either direct or indirect mechanism and is affected by chromium concentration, pH of the medium, incubation period and type of microorganisms. In the direct mechanism, chromium reductases reduce chromium (VI) (Losi et al., 1994), whereas in case of indirect mode, it is either reductants or oxidants eg., H2S which detoxify chromium (VI) into chromium (III) (De Filippi and Lupton, 1992). Reduction of chromium (VI) to chromium (III) is either aerobic or anaerobic but not both when electron donors are added to the culture medium. Reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) by chromium reductase is anaerobic (Lovley and Phillips, 1994), aerobic (Cervantes et al., 2001) and both anaerobic and aerobic (Marsh and McInerney, 2001).Chromium reductases are found in the membrane of the cells, as studied in Pseudomonas fluorescens and Enterobacter cloacae (Wang et al., 1990). Reduction of Cr (VI) to Cr (III) forms insoluble precipitate [Cr(OH)3], which is easily removed from wastewater (Jeyasingh and Philip, 2005). The enzyme chromium reductase found in P. ambigua and Bacillus sp. (Wang et al., 1991) were purified and characterized (Puzon et al., 2002). Precipitation of Cr (III) following the reduction of Cr (VI) by H2S produced by bacteria, is an important mechanism in sulfate-rich soil environment under anaerobic conditions (Losi et al., 1994). Thus these bacteria can be used in chromium contaminated soils for the removal of chromium toxicity (Wani et al., 2007; Wani and Khan, 2010) and consequently enhance the growth and yield of plants (Wani and Khan, 2013). These chromium reducing bacteria can also produce some growth promoting substances which can enhance the yield of the crop (Wani and Khan, 2013). Therefore, the use of chromium tolerant bacteria is a cost effective bioremediation process for detoxification of chromium. The present study was therefore under taken (1) To determine the resistance pattern of bacteria to heavy metals and antibiotics, (2) To check Cr (VI) reduction under varying pH and chromium concentration and (3) To check the effect of Bacillus sp. PZ3 on pea growth in the absence and presence of chromium.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Isolation of bacteria: Bacteria were isolated from the contaminated soils of Abeokuta on nutrient agar medium by spread plate technique. One gram of soil sample was added to 10 mL of normal saline solution and diluted serially. Ten microliters of the suspension was spread plated on the surface of the solid nutrient agar plates and incubated at 28±2°C for 24 h. Isolated bacterial cultures were then purified and preserved on nutrient agar slants for further experiments.

Evaluation of bacterial strains for metal tolerance: Bacterial strains were tested for their resistance to three heavy metals viz., chromium, zinc and copper by agar plate dilution method (Holt et al., 1994). Agar plates were then amended with increasing concentration of Cr (0-700 μg mL–1), Zn (0-700 μg mL–1) and Cu (0-700 μg mL–1) which were then spot inoculated (10 μL) with 108 cells mL–1. Plates were incubated at 28±2°C for 72 h and highest concentration of heavy metals supporting growth was defined as Maximum Resistance Level (MRL). Each experiment was replicated three times.

Evaluation of bacterial strains for antibiotic sensitivity: Bacterial strains were tested for their sensitivity to ten antibiotics and their reactions to antibiotics were determined by the disc diffusion method (Bauer et al., 1966).

In vitro assay of hydrogen cyanide and ammonia: Hydrogen cyanide and ammonia production by bacterial isolates was detected by the method of Bakker and Schippers (1987) and Dye (1962), respectively. For HCN production, the bacterial strains were grown on an HCN induction medium (30 g tryptic soy broth, 4.4 g glycine, 15 g agar/l) at 28±2°C for four days. For each bacterial isolate, 100 μL of 108 cells mL–1 was placed in the centre of the petri plates. A disk of Whatman filter paper No. 1 dipped in 0.5% picric acid and 2% Na2CO3 was placed at the lid of the petri plates. Plates were sealed with parafilm. After four days incubation at 28±2°C, an orange brown colour of the paper indicating HCN production was observed. For ammonia production, the bacterial strains were grown in peptone water (g L–1: Peptone10 g, NaCl5 g, pH 7) and incubated at 30±2°C for four days. One milliliter of Nessler reagent was added to each tube and the development of yellow color indicating ammonia production was recorded (Dye, 1962).

Chromium (VI) reduction: In order to check the effect of pH on hexavalent chromium [Cr (VI)] reduction in vitro, the nutrient broth (NB) was amended with 100 μg mL–1 of Cr (VI), adjusted to pH 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 with 1M HCL or 1M NaOH and incubated at 28±2°C for 120 h. Further, to study the effect of different concentrations (0, 50,100 and 150 μg mL–1) of Cr (VI), the K2Cr2O7 were amended in nutrient broth and incubated at 28±2°C for 120 h. For Cr (VI) reduction, 1 mL culture from each flask was centrifuged (6000 rpm) for 10 min at 10°C and Cr (VI) in the supernatant was determined by 1,5-diphenyl carbazide method (Eaton et al., 1992) upto 120 h. Briefly, the test samples were acidified (pH 1-2) and 1,5 diphenyl carbazide (50 μg mL–1) was added and Cr (VI) concentration was detected by UV-VIS spectrophotometer (752N Lamfield medical England) at 540 nm.

Effect of chromium reducing Bacillus species on pea in chromium amended soil: The soil which is used in this study was sandy clay loam (organic carbon 0.33%, Kjeldahl N 0.61 g kg–1, Olsen P 18 mg kg–1, pH 7.1 and WHC 0.35 mL g–1). Seeds which were used in this experiment were sterilized with the help of 70% ethanol, 3 min; 3% sodium hypochlorite, 3 min, after sterilization of the seeds, these seeds were then rinsed six times with sterile water and ultimately these seeds were dried in the shade. The sterilized seeds were coated with Bacillus sp. PZ3 after growing them in nutrient broth, for two hours using 10% gum Arabic as adhesive to deliver approximately 108 cells seed–1. The control seeds were soaked in sterile water after sterilizing the seeds. The clay pots (25 cm high, 22 cm internal diameter) having three kg sterilized soil with control (with out chromium) and three treatments having 25, 50 and 100 mg Cr/kg soil) were sown with the seeds (10 seeds per pot) with and with out Bacillus species PZ3. The normal concentration of Cr (50 mg Cr/kg) used in this study was comparable to those found in sewage soil used for pea production. Three pots were arranged in a complete randomized design. After one week of growth of these seeds in the pots, the pea plants were thinned to three and were watered as per the requirement and were maintained in an open field condition. All plants were removed at 120 Days After Seeding (DAS) and were observed for plant growth and nodulation. Plants harvested after 120 DAS were oven-dried at 80°C and dry matter was measured. Total chlorophyll and leghaemglobin contents in fresh foliage were measured after 120 days of harvesting by the method of Arnon (1949) and Sadasivam and Manickam (1992), respectively. Grain protein was estimated by the method of Lowry et al. (1951). Data of the measured parameters were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) for two factor pot culture experiment and significant partial difference (LSD) was calculated at 5% probability level.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Evaluation of bacterial strains for metal tolerance:The selected bacterial strains were tested for their tolerate to chromium (VI) and other metals (Fig. 1). Among the bacterial strains, Bacillus spp., PZ3 and Streptococcus spp., PZ4 showed highest tolerance to chromium (VI) (700 μg mL–1), whereas Pseudomonas spp. PZ1 and Streptococcus spp., PZ2 (700 μg mL–1 each) to copper and zinc. There are reports which showed sufficiently high tolerance to heavy metals by the bacterial isolates (Wani et al., 2007; Wani and Khan, 2013). There are conflicting reports available in many studies for the level of tolerance exhibited by many bacteria, which may be due to the variation in the tolerance level of bacteria and their growth conditions (Rajkumar et al., 2005). For example, Rhizobium leguminosarum isolated from metal contaminated soil tolerated 92.9 μM of zinc (Delorme et al., 2003), while as Rhizobium species tolerated 300 mg kg–1 nickel and showed an effective symbiosis with Trifolium repense, when the legume was grown in nickel amended soils (Smith and Giller, 1992).

Fig. 1:Maximum tolerance level shown by different bacterial isolates against different metals

Table 1: Resistance pattern of different bacterial species to various antibiotics

In the present studies, Bacillus spp., PZ3 and Streptococcus spp., PZ4 showed highest tolerance to chromium (VI), Pseudomonas spp., PZ1 and Streptococcus spp. PZ2 showed highest tolerance to copper and zinc, respectively. The metal tolerant strains were characterized by physiological, morphological and biochemical characteristics. The strain PZ1 and PZ6 was characterized as Pseudomonas spp., PZ2 and PZ4 was characterized as Streptococcus spp., PZ3 was characterized as Bacillus spp., while PZ5 was characterized as Micrococcus spp.

Evaluation of bacterial strains for antibiotics resistance: Resistance of bacterial strains to different antibiotics varied considerably (Table 1). Among the bacterial species, 100% of were resistant to septrin, chloramphenicol, sparfloxacin, amoxacillin, augumentin, tarivid and streptomycin. Resistance to antibiotics may be due to the genetic mutation or by transfer of antibiotic resistant genes between organisms (Spain and Alm, 2003). Multiple antibiotic resistances shown by the bacterial species in this study (e.g. Bacillus spp., PZ3 and Pseudomonas spp., PZ6) could be due to a high degree of tolerance to metals. In many studies, metal tolerance and antibiotic resistance have been reported (Wani et al., 2009; Yilmaz, 2003).

In vitro assay of HCN and ammonia: All the isolated bacterial strains were found to be positive for ammonia while as strain Bacillus spp.PZ3 and Streptococcus spp., PZ4 were only found positive for HCN. The ammonia synthesized by these bacterial strains plays a signalling role in the interaction between plant growth promoting bacteria and plants (Becker et al., 2002). Ammonia is known to increase the glutamine synthetase activity (Sood et al., 2002). In addition, ammonia transporters found in bacterial species may be involved in the reabsorption of NH4+ released as a consequence of NH3 diffusion through the bacterial membrane (Van Dommelen et al., 1997).

Fig. 2: Effect of pH on Cr (VI) reduction ability by Bacillus spp. PZ3 after 120 h of growth

Fig. 3: Effect of Cr (VI) concentrations on Cr (VI) reduction ability of Bacillus spp. PZ3 after 120 h of incubation

Chromium (VI) reduction: Chromium, an environmental pollutant is released from various industries. Among the two forms of chromium, Cr (VI) is the most toxic and carcinogenic (Kamaludeen et al., 2003). It’s toxicity is due to high solubility in water, rapid permeability and its interaction with intracellular proteins and nucleic acids. Reduction of Cr (VI) results in the formation of stable, less soluble and less toxic Cr (III) and is thus an important bioremediation process in chromium affected environments (Thacker et al., 2007). Therefore, the present study was designed to determine the Cr (VI) reducing ability of the metal tolerant bacterial strain.

A high tolerant strain was thus chosen for chromium (VI) reduction under in vitro conditions. This study was carried out to access (i) effect of different pH on reduction of Cr (VI) and (ii) effect of chromate concentration on Cr (VI) reduction.

The effect of pH on chromium (VI) reduction is shown in Fig. 2. Maximum reduction (87.5%) was observed at pH 7 by Bacillus spp., PZ3. Similarly, Bacillus spp., PZ3 significantly reduced the chromium (VI) at pH 5 (55%), pH 6 (80%), pH 8 (71.25%) and pH 9 (47.5%), respectively, at 100 μg Cr/mL after 120 h of incubation.

In second experiment, the chromium reduction was observed in the chosen bacterial strain in nutrient broth amended with 50, 100 and 150 μg mL–1 of K2Cr2O7 under in vitro conditions. The time for total reduction of chromium (VI) increased with increase in the concentration of chromium (VI).

Table 2: Effect of Cr (VI) concentration on growth and nodulation of pea plants at 120 DAS grown in the presence and absence of Bacillus sp. PZ3
Each value is a mean of three replicates where each replicate constituted three plants/pot; Mean values are significant at p≥0.05

Table 3:Effect of Cr (VI) concentrations on chlorophyll, leghaemoglobin and seed protein of pea plants at 90 DAS grown in soil inoculated with and with out Bacillus sp., PZ3

During this study, almost complete reduction of chromium (VI) occurred after 120 h by Bacillus spp., PZ3 (Fig. 3) at 50 μg mL–1 of chromium. Bacillus spp., PZ3 reduced chromium (VI) at concentration of 50 μg Cr/ mL (97.5%), 100 μg Cr/mL (87.5%) and 150 μg Cr/mL (66.7 %), respectively. Our study is in correlation with the study of Yang et al. (2009) who observed significant reduction of chromium (VI). In this study, Intrasporangium species Q5-1 reduced chromium (VI) by 98% after 84 h of incubation at 2,3 or 4 mM of Cr (VI) whereas at 5mM Cr (VI), the same bacterial species reduced Cr (VI) by 70% after 72 h of incubation. In another study, Bacillus species isolated from tannery effluent reduced 71.4% of Cr (VI) at 1100 mg L–1 of Cr (VI) after 24 h of incubation (Chaturvedi, 2011). Ibrahim et al. (2011) found that the Bacillus species KSUCr5 reduced 100% of Cr (VI) concentration of 40 mg L–1 within 24 h whereas 100% chromium reduction was achieved for 60-80 and 100 mg L–1 of Cr (VI) after 48 and 72 h, respectively. It was also observed that Bacillus species KSUCr5 reduced only 78.2 and 44.2% of Cr (VI) at 150 and 200 mg L–1, respectively after 72 h of incubation. The strain KSUCr5 could also reduce Cr (VI) between a pH range of 7-12 with a maximum reduction at pH 10.

Effect of chromium reducing Bacillus species on pea in chromium amended soil: In the present study, effect of chromium on plant growth was studied both under unicoculated and inoculated conditions (Table 2 and 3). Pea plants showed severe toxic effects of chromium when grown in the absence of the bacterial strain. But when these pea plants were grown in sandy clay loam soil amended with chromium in the presence of chromium reducing Bacillus sp., PZ3 increased the measured parameters (Table 2). The Bacillus PZ3 when grown in the presence of 50 mg kg–1 Cr (VI), increased the root length, shoot length, nodule numbers, nodule dry weight and total dry weight by 15, 15, 7, 41 and 10%, at 120 DAS, respectively, compared to control. While comparing the effects of Bacillus PZ3 on pea applied with different concentrations of chromium, a maximum increase of 82, 58, 40, 52 and 31% at 120 DAS, in root length, shoot length, nodule numbers, dry nodule mass and total dry mass, respectively was observed at 50 mg Cr/kg soil compared to non-inoculated but having same concentration of chromium. The two way ANOVA revealed that the individual effects of inoculation, chromium and interaction was significant (p≥0.05) for the measured parameters except the individual effects of inoculation on nodule number and chromium and interaction on nodule dry weight and total dry weight at 120 DAS.

Symbiotic association between chromium reducing strains and legumes are very important because of their potential for detoxification of chromium in chromium contaminated soils (Wani and Khan, 2010, 2013). In the present study, strain PZ3 increased plant growth and nodulation compared to uninoculated plants. Increase in plant growth and nodulation is due to chromium reduction and phytohormone production by strain PZ3 (Wani et al., 2007). There may be another reason for the increase in pea growth and nodulation that is mineral uptake and phytohormone production by the host plant which will ultimately protect the plants against the toxicity of chromium (Wani et al., 2008b). Similar results of increase in plant growth by the chromium reducing bacteria have been reported (Wani et al., 2008a; Wani and Khan, 2010).

Chlorophyll, leghaemoglobin and protein content at 120 DAS decreased significantly with increase in the concentration of Cr (VI) (Table 3) without the inoculation of strain PZ3. Chromium at 100 mg kg–1 decreased chlorophyll, leghaemoglobin and protein compared to un-inoculated control. The bio-inoculant with 50 mg Cr (VI)/kg, increased chlorophyll, leghaemoglobin in fresh nodules and protein in seeds, compared to un-inoculated but 50 mg Cr (VI)/kg amended soil. Two factors ANOVA revealed that the individual effects of inoculation and Cr (VI) and their interaction (inoculation x Cr (VI) were significant (p≥0.05)) for the measured parameters except Cr (VI) for chlorophyll. Similar increase in chlorophyll, leghaemoglobin and protein has also been reported (Wani et al., 2008a; Wani and Khan, 2013). Burd et al. (2000) also observed an increase in protein of tomato, canola and Indian mustard when plants were grown in the presence of Kluyvera ascorbata SUD 165 in the presence of high concentration of Ni, Pb and Zn.

CONCLUSIONS

This study concludes that the bacterial strains not only produced PGPR substances, reduced chromium (VI) but also increased plant growth under metal stress. Due to multifarious properties, these strains could therefore be used as bioremediators of metals in soils contaminated with heavy metals.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I am thankful to crescent university management for providing facilities to carry out this study. There was no grant for this project.

REFERENCES

  • Ackerley, D.F., Y. Barak, S.V. Lynch, J. Curtin and A. Matin, 2006. Effect of chromate stress on Escherichia coli K-12. J. Bacteriol., 188: 3371-3381.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Arnon, D.I., 1949. Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol., 24: 1-15.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Bae, W.C., H.K. Lee, Y.C. Choe, D.J. Jahng and S.H. Lee et al., 2005. Purification and characterization of NADPH-dependent Cr(VI) reductase from Escherichia coli ATCC 33456. J. Microbiol., 43: 21-27.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Bakker, A.W. and B. Schippers, 1987. Microbial cyanide production in the rhizosphere in relation to potato yield reduction and Pseudomonas SPP-mediated plant growth-stimulation. Soil Biol. Biochem., 19: 451-457.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bauer, A.W., W.M.M. Kirby, J.C. Sherris and M. Turck, 1966. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 45: 493-496.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Becker, D., R. Stanke, I. Fendrik, W.B. Frommer, J. Vanderleyden, W.M. Kaiser and R. Hedrich, 2002. Expression of the NH4+-transporter gene LEAMT1;2 is induced in tomato roots upon association with N2-fixing bacteria. Planta, 215: 424-429.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Burd, G.I., D.G. Dixon and B.R. Glick, 2000. Plant growth-promoting bacteria that decrease heavy metal toxicity in plants. Can. J. Microbiol., 46: 237-245.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Cervantes, C., J. Campos-Garcia, S. Devars, F. Gutierrez-Corona, H. Loza-Tavera, J.C. Torres-Guzman and R. Moreno-Sanchez, 2001. Interactions of chromium with microorganisms and plants. FEMS Microbiol., 25: 335-347.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chaturvedi, M.K., 2011. Studies on chromate removal by chromium-resistant Bacillus sp. isolated from tannery effluent. J. Environ. Protect., 2: 76-82.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sood, C.R., S.V. Chanda and Y.D. Singh, 2002. Effect of different nitrogen sources and plant growth regulators on glutamine synthetase and glutamate synthase activities of radish cotyledons. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol., 28: 46-56.
    Direct Link    


  • De Filippi, L.J. and F.S. Lupton, 1992. Bioremediation of soluble Cr(VI) using sulfate reducing bacteria. In: Allied Signal Research: National R and B Conference on the Control of Hazardous Materials, San Francisco, pp: 138.


  • Delorme, T.A., J.V. Gagliardi, J.S. Angle, P.B. van Berkum and R.L. Chaney, 2003. Phenotypic and genetic diversity of rhizobia isolated from nodules of clover grown in a zinc and cadmium contaminated soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 67: 1746-1754.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dye, D.W., 1962. The inadequacy of the usual determinative tests for the identification of Xanthomonas spp. N. Z. J. Sci., 5: 393-416.
    Direct Link    


  • Eaton, A.D., L.S. Clesceri and A.E. Greenberg, 1992. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. APHA/AWWA/WEF., Washington, DC., USA., Pages: 981


  • Faisal, M. and S. Hasnain, 2005. Bacterial Cr(VI) reduction concurrently improves sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) growth. Biotechnol. Lett., 27: 943-947.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Holt, J.G., N.R. Kreig, P.H.A. Sneath, J.T. Staley and S.T. Williams, 1994. Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 9th Edn., Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, USA., ISBN-13: 9780683006032, Pages: 787
    Direct Link    


  • Ibrahim, A.S.S., M.A. El-Tayeb, Y.B. Elbadawi and A.A. Al-Salamah, 2011. Bioreduction of Cr (VI) by potent novel chromate resistant alkaliphilic Bacillus sp. strain KSUCr5 isolated from hypersaline Soda lakes. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 10: 7207-7218.
    Direct Link    


  • Jeyasingh, J. and L. Philip, 2005. Bioremediation of chromium contaminated soil: Optimization of operating parameters under laboratory conditions. J. Hazrad. Mater., 1: 113-120.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Losi, M.E., C. Amrhein and W.T. Frankenberger Jr., 1994. Environmental Biochemistry of Chromium. In: Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, Ware, G.W. (Ed.). Vol. 136, Springer, New York, USA., ISBN: 9781461226567, pp: 91-121


  • Lovley, D.R. and E.J.P. Phillips, 1994. Bioremediation of metal contamination. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 60: 726-726.


  • Lowry, O.H., N.J. Rosebrough, A.L. Farr and R.J. Randall, 1951. Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem., 193: 265-275.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Kamaludeen, S.P.B., M. Megharaj, A.L. Juhasz, N. Sethunathan and R. Naidu, 2003. Chromium-microorganism interactions in soils: Remediation implications. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 178: 93-164.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Marsh, T.L. and M.J. McInerney, 2001. Relationship of hydrogen bioavailability to chromate reduction in aquifer sediments. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 67: 1517-1521.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Ortegel, J.W., E.D. Staren, L.P. Faber, W.H. Warren and D.P. Braun, 2002. Modulation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte cytolytic activity against human non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer, 36: 17-25.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Wang, P.C., K. Toda, H. Ohtake, I. Kusaka and I. Yabe, 1991. Membrane-bound respiratory system of Enterobacter cloacae strain HO1 grown anaerobically with chromate. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 78: 11-15.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Puzon, G.J., J.N. Petersen, A.G. Roberts, D.M. Kramer and L. Xun, 2002. A bacterial flavin reductase system reduces chromate to a soluble chromium(III)-NAD+ complex. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 294: 76-81.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rahman, M.U., S. Gul and M.Z.U. Haq, 2007. Reduction of chromium(VI) by locally isolated Pseudomonas sp. C-171. Turk. J. Biol., 31: 161-166.
    Direct Link    


  • Rajkumar, M., R. Nagendran, K.J. Lee and W.H. Lee, 2005. Characterization of a novel Cr6+ reducing Pseudomonas sp. with plant growth-promoting potential. Curr. Microbiol., 50: 266-271.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sadasivam, S. and A. Manickam, 1992. Biochemical Methods for Agricultural Sciences. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, India


  • Smith, S.R. and K.E. Giller, 1992. Effective Rhizobium leguminosarum biovar Trifolii present in five soils contaminated with heavy metals from long-term applications of sewage sludge or metal mine spoil. Soil Biol. Biochem., 24: 781-788.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Spain, A. and E. Alm, 2003. Implications of microbial heavy metal tolerance in the environment. Rev. Undergraduate Res., 2: 1-6.
    Direct Link    


  • Sultan, S. and S. Hasnain, 2005. Chromate reduction capability of a gram positive bacterium isolated from effluent of dying industry. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 75: 699-706.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Sultan, S. and S. Hasnain, 2007. Reduction of toxic hexavalent chromium by Ochrobactrum intermedium strain SDCr-5 stimulated by heavy metals. Biores. Technol., 98: 340-344.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Thacker, U., R. Parikh, Y. Shouche and D. Madamwar, 2007. Reduction of chromate by cell-free extract of Brucella sp. isolated from Cr(VI) contaminated sites. Bioresour. Technol., 98: 1541-1547.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Van Dommelen, A., E. van Bastelaere, V. Keijers and J. Vanderleyden, 1997. Genetics of Azospirillum brasilense with respect to ammonium transport, sugar uptake and chemotaxis. Plant Soil, 194: 155-160.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wang, P.C., T. Mori, K. Toda and H. Ohtake, 1990. Membrane-associated chromate reductase activity from Enterobacter cloacae. J. Bacteriol., 172: 1670-1672.
    Direct Link    


  • Wani, P.A. and O.H. Ayoola, 2015. Bioreduction of Cr (VI) by heavy metal resistant Pseudomonas species. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 8: 122-130.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wani, P.A. and M.S. Khan, 2013. Nickel detoxification and plant growth promotion by multi metal resistant plant growth promoting Rhizobium species RL9. Bullet. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 91: 117-124.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wani, P.A. and M.S. Khan, 2010. Bacillus species enhance growth parameters of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in chromium stressed soils. Food Chem. Toxicol., 48: 3262-3267.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wani, P.A., A. Zaidi and M.S. Khan, 2009. Chromium reducing and plant growth promoting potential of Mesorhizobium species under chromium stress. Bioremediation J., 13: 121-129.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wani, P.A., M.S. Khan and A. Zaidi, 2008. Chromium-reducing and plant growth-promoting Mesorhizobium improves chickpea growth in chromium-amended soil. Biotechnol. Lett., 30: 159-163.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Wani, P.A., M.S. Khan and A. Zaidi, 2007. Effect of metal tolerant plant growth promoting Bradyrhizobium sp. (vigna) on growth, symbiosis, seed yield and metal uptake by greengram plants. Chemosphere, 70: 36-45.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wani, P.A., M.S. Khan and A. Zaidi, 2008. Impact of zinc-tolerant plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on lentil grown in zinc-amended soil. Agron. Sustain. Dev., 28: 449-455.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yang, J., M. He and G. Wang, 2009. Removal of toxic chromate using free and immobilized Cr(VI)-reducing bacterial cells of Intrasporangium sp. Q5-1. World. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 25: 1579-1587.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yilmaz, E.I., 2003. Metal tolerance and biosorption capacity of Bacillus circulans strain EB1. Res. Microbiol., 154: 409-415.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Elangovan, R., S. Abhipsa, B. Rohit, P. Ligy and K. Chandraraj, 2006. Reduction of Cr(VI) by a Bacillus sp. Biotechnol. Lett., 28: 247-252.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved