HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Research Journal of Environmental Toxicology

Year: 2016 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 109-114
DOI: 10.3923/rjet.2016.109.114
Determination of Median Effective Inhibitory Concentration of Three Fungicides Widely Used for Treatment of Wheat on the Target Pest Fusarium sp.
M. Djekoun, H. Berrebbah, A. Saib and M.R. Djebar

Abstract: The pathogenic Fusarium species attack plants of major economic importance including wheat. Infection of cereal plants causes significant losses in crops but also the deterioration of the quality of grains and economic losses resulting are often very heavy. In the present study, we investigated the efficacy of three fungicides (thiram, tebuconazole and fludioxonil+difenoconazole) tested in vitro for their inhibitory activities against the target pest Fusarium sp., isolated from infected seed of wheat. Fungitoxicity was expressed as a percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth. The median lethal dose was calculated for each tested active ingredient. Among the chemical fungicides which were used, thiram was the most effective with EC50 value of 0.15 mg L–1 followed by the mixture fludioxonil-difenoconazole with a value equal to 0.27 mg L–1 and finally tebuconazole with 3.79 mg L–1.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
M. Djekoun, H. Berrebbah, A. Saib and M.R. Djebar, 2016. Determination of Median Effective Inhibitory Concentration of Three Fungicides Widely Used for Treatment of Wheat on the Target Pest Fusarium sp.. Research Journal of Environmental Toxicology, 10: 109-114.

Keywords: EC50, tebuconazole, fludioxonil, difenoconazole, Thiram and Fusarium sp.

INTRODUCTION

Fusarium wilt is the most devastating disease affecting cereal crops with small grains; it can devastate a crop in a few weeks before harvest and cause significant yield losses. The causative agents include two genera of pathogenic fungi: Microdochium and Fusarium (Atanasov, 1920; Bottalico, 1998; Arseniuk et al., 1999; Xu et al., 2005). They lead to a series of symptoms that are characterized by damping and necrosis of plant tissues and ears (Bottalico and Perrone, 2002; Xu and Nicholson, 2009). Furthermore, some Fusarium sp., produce mycotoxins which are toxic to animals and humans (Leonard and Bushnell, 2003). In addition, some highly toxic mycotoxins have recently been reclassified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as possibly carcinogenic in humans (Dalie, 2010). Smith (1884) described the disease in the UK. It may be associated with both high yield losses (abortion and low grain weight), reduction in their germination quality and a decrease in their quality by the presence of toxins in grains.

Devastating epidemics have been reported in Europe, USA, China and South America and caused yield losses of up to 30% (Mesterhazy and Rowaished, 1977; McMullen, 1997). In 2000, a 100% rate of loss has been recorded in certain French plots (Carlier, 2001).

To control this disease, several strategies have been developed. Chemical control remains one of the most important interventions and the efficiency of culture is directly related. Several families of fungicides are used including the triazoles (Maufras et al., 1994; Caron, 1995; Mielke and Weinert, 1996; Mesterhazy et al., 2003; Mateo et al., 2011). They inhibit the biosynthesis of ergosterol and are considered the most active against Fusarium wilt. Other fungicides classes are also used such as dithiocarbamates (Fravel et al., 2005).

Therefore, the objective of the present study was (1) To assess the sensitivity, in vitro, of the pathogenic Fusarium sp., isolated from seeds of wheat, towards three fungicides including tebuconazole, thiram and the mixture fludioxonil-difenoconazole which have been introduced recently against Fusarium spp. and (2) to determine the median effective inhibitory concentration (EC50) values for each fungicide.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Biological material: The seed of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. subsp. Aestivum) was supplied to us by the National Institute of Plant Protection (INPV), Annaba, Algeria.

Fungal strains: The strains of Fusarium sp. were obtained from seed of wheat. The seeds were previously disinfected by soaking in a solution of sodium hypochlorite 2% followed by thorough rinsing with sterile distilled water. They are then dried with sterile filter paper.

Surface disinfected seeds were plated on the PDA medium (Potato Dextrose Agar) and were usually incubated for 7-10 days at 25°C (ISTA., 1996; Mathur and Kongsdal, 2003). The identification of the pathogen was done based on some morphological characteristics of colonies (growth rate, colony appearance, pigmentation) and microscopic observation of spores (shape and size).

Fungicides: The active ingredients used in the in vitro tests were: Tebuconazole (Rival), fludioxonil+difenoconazole (syngenta) and thiram (Sipcam Inagra) (Table 1). Preliminary tests were conducted for each fungicide to choose the range of concentrations to obtain a dose-effect response.

The experiments were performed by testing five concentrations for each active ingredient: 0.06, 1.39, 2.79, 5.58 and 11.16 mg L–1 for tebuconazole, 0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.21 and 0.42 mg L–1 for Thiram and finally 4 concentrations were selected for the mixture fludioxonil-difenoconazole (0.05, 0.1, 0.5 and 1 mg L–1).

In vitro toxicity tests: The objective of this experiment is to assess inhibitory activity on the growth of Fusarium cultures. Synthetic fungicides were incorporated aseptically to get desired concentration in the culture medium kept supercooled (40-45°C). The mixture is then poured equally into three petri dishes. Mycelial disks of the pathogen (6 mm in diameter) will be cut from young cultures of Fusarium sp. (7 days old culture) and were then deposited in the center of petri dishes with a PDA media amended with the fungicides. Meanwhile, untreated control will be made in the same way where the same amount of fungicide is replaced by sterile distilled water. The dishes are then incubated at 25°C. After 7 days of incubation, the mean diameter of the colonies was estimated from two perpendicular diameters. The experiment was repeated 4 times. Fungi toxicity was recorded in terms of percentage colony inhibition and calculated according to Pandey et al. (1982). Percentage growth inhibition was determined using the Eq. 1:

(1)
Where:
D0 = Average diameter of fungal colony with control
Df = Average diameter of colonies in the presence of the fungicide

Table 1: Fungicides tested on Fusarium strains

Fig. 1:Evolution of Fusarium sp., colonies treated with increasing concentration (Case of tebuconazole)

EC50 determination: The median effective inhibitory concentration (The concentration of fungicides which reduced the mycelial growth of Fusarium sp. by 50%) is calculated according to the method of Finny (1971).

The percentages of inhibition are transformed into probit values. The regression lines are drawn according to the Eq. 2:

(2)
Where:
a = Regression coefficient
b = Constant
y = The probit
x = log10 of the concentrations

Statistical analysis: The obtained data was analyzed using Minitab16 student t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) to detect significant differences reported for the studied parameters.

RESULTS

Isolation and identification of the pathogen: On PDA medium, strain growth results in the production of aerial and dense mycelium (cottony) of a white color on the front and yellow on the back. The color of the back turns crimson when culture is older.

Under an optical microscope (Olympus CH20), we observe macroconidia with 4-6 septate, curved in shape and may have a pointed terminal as described by Champion (1997).

Effect of fungicides on mycelium growth: The results of studying the influence of the fungicides upon the growth of the phytopathogenic strain of Fusarium sp. show that the 3 molecules affected significantly the growth of paramecia (p≤0.001). Indeed, for Fusarium strains treated with the highest concentration of thiram (0.42 mg L–1), colonies displayed a diameter of about 1.60 cm compared to control colonies (8.29 cm). As to the strains treated by fludioxonil-difenoconazole and tebuconazole, the diameter of colonies is about 1.70 for the respective concentrations of 1 and 11.16 mg L–1. Figure 1 shows the evolution of Fusarium colonies treated with increasing concentration (Case of tebuconazole).

Our results gave clear and gradual decrease of diameter of colonies in dependent dose manner (Fig. 2).

Response inhibition: Based on the acute toxicity results, a percentage of inhibition of mycelial growth was calculated. The highest percentage of inhibition was obtained with Thiram where inhibition reached 81% for the concentration of 0.42 mg L–1. Fludioxonil-difenoconazole mixture and tebuconazole also showed high percentages of inhibition of about 79% for the respective concentrations of 1 and 11.16 mg L–1 (Fig. 3). It should be noted that statistical analysis revealed a significative inhibition (p≤0.001) of mycelial growth of Fusarium sp., treated with fludioxonil-difenoconazole mixture dice the lowest concentration (0.05 mg L–1).

EC50 determination: The EC50 of the fungicides was calculated according to the linear relation between inhibitory probit and concentration logarithm. Table 2 shows the EC50 values of the three fungicides: thiram, tebuconazole and fludioxonil-difenoconazole (0.15, 3.79 and 0.27 mg L–1). Of these, thiram and the mixture fludioxonil-difenoconazole proved to be the most effective in inhibiting mycelial growth.

Fig. 2(a-c): Effects of selected fungicides on mycelium growth of Fusarium sp. treated by, (a) Thirame, (b) Tebuconazole and (c) Fludioxonil-difenoconazole after 7 days of incubation at 25°C (p≤0.001)

Fig. 3(a-c):
Inhibitory effect of (a) Thiram, (b) Tebuconazole and (c) Fludioxonil-difenoconazole, on Fusarium sp. Results expressed in response percentage and each value is average±standard error of four replicates (***p<0.001)

DISCUSSION

Fusarium wilt is regarded as one of the most important diseases of wheat. The development of this disease may have serious consequences on both crop yields and grain quality (Pirgozliev et al., 2003). Several synthetic antifungal agents have been developed (Prasad et al., 2010) but fungicide application still the key factor in the control of fungal diseases.

Table 2: Values of EC50 for the three fungicides screened in vitro on Fusarium sp.

In this study we focused first on evaluating the efficiency of three fungicides from different chemical classes. We noticed that the selected fungicides reduced the mycelial growth of Fusarium in dose-dependent manner. At the concentrations tested in the in vitro experiments, thiram reduced significantly the mycelium growth and final colony size of Fusarium sp. at the concentration of 0.42 mg L–1 compared to growth on unamended thiram medium. Similar observation was done by Fravel et al. (2005) when studying the effects of thiram on mycelial growth of Fusarium oxysporum strain CS-20.

As shown reported in literature, triazoles proved to be the most active molecules against Fusarium species (Edwards et al., 2001; Matthies and Buchenauer, 2000; Menniti et al., 2003; Blandino et al., 2006, 2012). These types of fungicides interfere with the metabolism of fungal pathogens, mainly by inhibition of ergosterol biosynthesis (Ragsdale, 1977; Hewitt, 1998) and often cause striking morphological malformations of cell wall. This confirms the strong decrease of colony sizes observed in strains exposed to tebuconazole and difenoconazole+fludioxonil. Indeed, the diameter of the colonies decreases significantly until it reaches a value of about 1.7 cm compared to the control (8 cm).

On the other hand, the response percentages confirm the toxic effects of the increasing concentrations tested. Indeed, for the higher concentrations of tebuconazole, the inhibition rate has reached a value of 79.76%. These results correlated well with the recent data on the effects of tebuconazole on growth and production of toxins by Fusarium langsthiae (Mateo et al., 2011). These results also agree with previous reports (Ramirez et al., 2004). These authors emphasize the great efficiency of triazoles, against the pathogenic species of Fusarium graminearum and report that none of the isolates of F. graminearum were able to grow in the presence of any active triazole substance at concentrations >15 mg mL–1.

The strain treated with a mixture of triazoles and phenylpyrroles (Fludioxonil) led to a significant inhibition (79.41%), as great as that obtained with triazole alone. However, concerning the median effective inhibitory concentration, the EC50 value for tebuconazole was lower than fludioxonil+difenoconazole suggesting better efficacy overall of the mixture in controlling growth of Fusarium sp. The results obtained are in agreement with those of Ioos et al. (2005), who observed the most efficient control of F. graminearum by mixing the triazoles and strobilurins. Mesterhazy et al. (2011) demonstrated that the mixture of two triazoles provide a significative higher reduction of FHB disease.

CONCLUSION

The in vitro exposure showed that the three selected fungicides inhibit mycelial growth of Fusarium sp. till 80%. Additionally, the efficiency of the combination of two or more active ingredients has been demonstrated. The EC50 values vary from 0.27 mg L–1 for the mixture fludioxonil-difenoconazole and 3.79 mg L–1 for tebuconazole and thiram provide to be the most effective with a value of 0.15 mg L–1.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors wish to thank The National Institute of Plant Protection (El kous) for the monitoring of the experimental trials. Djekoun M. is also grateful to M. Boudib for her excellent technical assistance and her advices.

REFERENCES

  • Arseniuk, E., E. Foremska, T. Goral and L. Chelkowski, 1999. Fusarium head blight reactions and accumulation of deoxynivalenol (DON) and some of its derivatives in kernels of wheat, triticale and rye. J. Phytopathol., 147: 577-590.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Atanasov, D., 1920. Fusarium-Blight (Scab) of Wheat and Other Cereals. 1st Edn., Government Printing Office, Washington, DC., Pages: 32


  • Blandino, M., M. Haidukowski, M. Pascale, L. Plizzari, D. Scudellari and A. Reyneri, 2012. Integrated strategies for the control of Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol contamination in winter wheat. Field Crops Res., 133: 139-149.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Blandino, M., L. Minelli and A. Reyner, 2006. Strategies for the chemical control of Fusarium head blight: Effect on yield, alveographic parameters and deoxynivalenol contamination in winter wheat grain. Eur. J. Agron., 25: 193-201.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bottalico, A. and G. Perrone, 2002. Toxigenic Fusarium species and mycotoxins associated with head blight in small-grain cereals in Europe. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 108: 611-624.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bottalico, A., 1998. Fusarium diseases of cereals: Species complex and related mycotoxin profiles, in Europe. J. Plant Pathol., 80: 85-103.
    Direct Link    


  • Finny, D.J., 1971. Probit Analysis. Cambridge University Press, London, UK


  • Fravel, D.R., K.L. Deahl and J.R. Stommel, 2005. Compatibility of the biocontrol fungus Fusarium oxysporum strain CS-20 with selected fungicides. Biol. Control, 34: 165-169.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hewitt, A.F., 1998. Fungicides in Plant Protection. CAB International, Wallingford


  • ISTA., 1996. International rules for seed testing. Seed Sci. Technol., 24: 39-42.


  • Leonard, K.J. and W.R. Bushnell, 2003. Fusarium Head Blight of Wheat and Barley. 1st Edn., APS Press, St. Paul, MA., USA., ISBN-13: 978-0890543023, Pages: 530


  • Ioos, R., A. Belhadj, M. Menez and A. Faure, 2005. The effects of fungicides on Fusarium spp. and Microdochium nivale and their associated trichothecene mycotoxins in French naturally-infected cereal grains. Crop Protect., 24: 894-902.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mateo, E.M., F.M. Valle-Algarra, R. Mateo, M. Jimenez and N. Magan, 2011. Effect of fenpropimorph, prochloraz and tebuconazole on growth and production of T-2 and HT-2 toxins by Fusarium langsethiae in oat-based medium. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 151: 289-298.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Mathur, S.B. and O. Kongsdal, 2003. Common Laboratory Seed Health Testing Methods for Detecting Fungi. International Seed Testing Association, Bassersdorf, Switzerland, ISBN-13: 9783906549354, Pages: 425
    Direct Link    


  • Matthies, A. and H. Buchenauer, 2000. Effect of tebuconazole (Folicur®) and prochloraz (Sportale®) treatments on Fusarium head scab development, yield and deoxynivalenol (DON) content in grains of wheat following artificial inoculation with Fusarium culmorum. J. Plant Dis. Protect., 107: 33-52.
    Direct Link    


  • Maufras, J.Y., C. Maumene, M.M. Bourdin and M.M. Leroux, 1994. Fongicides Cereales et Proteagineux. International Tropical Conservation Foundation, Paris, France, Pages: 144


  • McMullen, M.P., R. Jones and D. Gallenberg, 1997. Scab of wheat and barley: A re-emerging disease of devastating impact. Plant Dis., 81: 1340-1348.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Menniti, A.M., D. Pancaldi, M. Maccaferri and L. Casalini, 2003. Effect of fungicides on Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol content in durum wheat grain. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol., 109: 109-115.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mesterhazy, A., J. Bartok and C. Lamper, 2003. Influence of wheat cultivar, species of Fusarium and isolate aggressiveness on the efficacy of fungicides for control of fusarium head blight. Plant Dis., 87: 1107-1115.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mesterhazy, A. and A.K. Rowaished, 1977. Analysis of symptoms caused by Fusarium graminearum Schwabe and its relation to powdery mildew infection in wheat. Acta Phytopathologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 12: 289-301.


  • Mesterhazy, A., B. Toth, M. Varga, T. Bartok, A. Szabo-Hever, L. Farady and S. Lehoczki-Krsjak, 2011. Role of fungicides, application of nozzle types and the resistance level of wheat varieties in the control of Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol. Toxins, 3: 1453-1483.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mielke, H. and J. Weinert, 1996. Investigations on the effect of various fungicides on the pathogen of partial head blight (Fusarium culmorum/WG Sm./Sacc.). Nachr. Dt. Pfl Schutzdienst, 48: 93-95.


  • Pandey, D.K., N.N. Tripathi, R.D. Tripathi and S.N. Dixit, 1982. Fungitoxic and phytotoxic properties of essential oil of Hyptis sauveolens (L.) Poir. J. Plant Dis. Prot., 89: 344-349.


  • Pirgozliev, S.R., S.G. Edwards, M.C. Hare and P. Jenkinson, 2003. Strategies for the control of Fusarium head blight in cereals. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 109: 731-742.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Prasad, M.N.N., S.S. Bhat and M.Y. Sreenivasa, 2010. Antifungal activity of essential oils against Phomopsis azadirachtae-the causative agent of die-back disease of neem. J. Agric. Technol., 6: 127-133.
    Direct Link    


  • Ragsdale, N.N., 1977. Inhibition of Fungal Ergosterol Synthesis. In: Antifungal Compounds: Interactions in Biological and Ecological Systems, Siegel, M.R. and H.D. Sisler (Eds.). Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, USA., pp: 333-363


  • Ramirez, L., S. Chulze and N. Magan, 2004. Impact of environmental factors and fungicides on growth and deoxinivalenol production by Fusarium graminearum isolates from Argentinian wheat. Crop Protect., 23: 117-125.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Smith, W.G., 1884. Diseases of Field and Garden Crops. Macmillan and co., London, pp: 208-213


  • Xu, X.M., D.W. Parry, P. Nicholson, M.A. Thomsett and D. Simpson et al., 2005. Predominance and association of pathogenic fungi causing Fusarium ear blightin wheat in four European countries. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 112: 143-154.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Xu, X. and P. Nicholson, 2009. Community ecology of fungal pathogens causing wheat head blight. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 47: 83-103.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Carlier, B., 2001. Les fusarioses: Des maladies dures a combattre. J. Agric., 557: 36-38.
    Direct Link    


  • Caron, D., 1995. Les fongicides contre la fusariose des epis. Pourquoi leur efficacite est elle seulement moyenne? ITCF Perspect. Agric., 198: 80-82.


  • Champion, R., 1997. Identifier les Champignons Transmis par les Semences. Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Paris, France, pp: 166-197


  • Dalie, D.K.D., 2010. Biocontrole des moisissures du genre Fusarium productrices de fumonisines par selection de bacteries lactiques autochtones de mais. Ph.D. Thesis, School of Life Science and Health, Bordeaux 1 University, France.


  • Edwards, S.G., S.R. Pirgozliev, M.C. Hare and P. Jenkinson, 2001. Quantification of trichothecene-producing Fusarium species in harvested grain by competitive PCR to determine efficacies of fungicides against Fusarium head blight of winter wheat. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 67: 1575-1580.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved