HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Plant Pathology Journal

Year: 2006 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 54-59
DOI: 10.3923/ppj.2006.54.59
Inheritance of Avirulence in Sclerospora graminicola, the Pearl Millet Downy Mildew Pathogen
B. Pushpavathi, R.P. Thakur and K. Chandrashekara Rao

Abstract: The  present  research  studied the  inheritance  of avirulence by hybridizing the isolates Sg 139-4 (Mat A) a highly virulent and Sg 110-9 (Mat B) an avirulent on a pearl millet genotype IP 18292 containing a downy mildew resistance gene Rsg1. Pot-grown seedlings of IP 18292 were inoculated with sporangial inocula generated from sexual spores (oospore) of the parental isolates and their F1, F2, BC1 and BC2 progenies and incubated at 25±2°C and >90% relative humidity in a greenhouse. Downy mildew incidence was recorded two weeks after inoculation. The results indicated that avirulence was dominant over virulence and a single gene pair (AA/Aa) controlled avirulence in isolates Sg 110-9, to a corresponding resistance gene Rsg1 in IP 18292. The pattern of segregation of virulence: avirulence suggested the presence of a gene-for-gene interaction between S. graminicola and P. glaucum.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
B. Pushpavathi, R.P. Thakur and K. Chandrashekara Rao, 2006. Inheritance of Avirulence in Sclerospora graminicola, the Pearl Millet Downy Mildew Pathogen. Plant Pathology Journal, 5: 54-59.

Keywords: Sclerospora graminicola, downy mildew, Pearl millet, avirulence and inheritance

INTRODUCTION

Downy mildew of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.], caused by Sclerospora graminicola (Sacc.) Schroet is a serious disease, particularly on single-cross F1 hybrids, which are cultivated on about 60% of the total 10 million ha in India[1].

During the 1970s and the 1980s several downy mildew epidemics occurred resulting in withdrawal of several hybrids[2,3]. Currently, over 50 different hybrid cultivars are grown in India and some of these have recorded downy mildew incidence up to 100% during the surveys in states of Maharashtra, Rajasthan and Gujarat[4-6], accounting for a considerable yield loss.

S. graminicola, is an oomycetous obligate biotroph and reproduces both by sexual and asexual means. It is a heterothallic fungus and existence of mating types has been demonstrated[7-9]. High susceptibility of otherwise resistant hybrids within few years of cultivation led to the understanding of host-directed virulence selection in S. graminicola population [10]. Systematic survey of pearl millet hybrids in farmers’ fields for downy mildew incidence, collection of isolates from susceptible hybrids and their pathogenic characterization using host differentials and the multilocation evaluation of pearl millet downy mildew virulence nursery have led to the identification of at least six different populations (pathotypes) of S graminicola existing in different parts of India[11,12].

Resistance to downy mildew in pearl millet is governed by single dominant gene[13], recessive gene[14] and multiple genes with epistatic effects[15]. A number of Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL) offering resistance to individual or multiple pathotypes have been detected in some of the resistance sources used in developing mapping populations[16,17].

Studies on inheritance of avirulence are as important as those on inheritance of resistance to understand the host-pathogen interaction at the genetic level. Following the classical studies by Flor[18] and establishment of the gene-for-gene hypothesis for the inheritance of pathogenicity in the flax rust fungus, Melampsora lini several studies have been reported. Person and Sidhu[19] reviewed the subject on the genetics of pathogenicity and generalized that the virulence/avirulence was usually under Mendelian control in Ustilago hordei (Pers.), the barley smut pathogen. In maize, Lim et al.[20] reported monogenic inheritance of virulence for Helminthosporium turcicum. Studies on inheritance of virulence in the lettuce downy mildew pathogen Bremia lactucae demonstrated that the virulence to match resistance factors R1, R2, R4 and R11 each segregated as single loci with avirulence being dominant to virulence and the inheritance of virulence to R6 was complex[21,22]. These studies confirmed that the virulence in B. lactucae to match the specific resistance genes located in lettuce cultivars was controlled as predicted by a gene-for-gene relationship. In B. lactucae, it was suggested that the loci controlling virulence to R2 and R11 were linked[21] and linkage was also suggested between loci controlling virulence to R5, R8 and R10[22]. Such studies in case of S. graminicola are lacking, primarily because of the unavailability of well-defined resistance genes in its host, pearl millet. In this study, we investigated the inheritance of avirulence using two distinct single-zoospore isolates, Sg 139-4 and Sg 110-9 of S. graminicola that were clearly defined as virulent and avirulent, respectively on a pearl millet inbred line IP 18292 that was shown to contain a single dominant gene (Sgr1) conferring complete resistance to a specific downy mildew pathotype[13].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Selection of parental isolates of S. graminicola and tester host genotype: The highly virulent Single-zoospore Isolate (SZI), Sg 139-4 (Mat A) and avirulent isolate SZI Sg 110-9 (Mat B) on a pearl millet genotype IP 18292, a pure inbred line, were selected as parental isolates for the study. The SZIs were maintained on seedlings of a uniformly highly susceptible pearl millet genotype 7042S through asexual generation in isolation chambers in a greenhouse[23].

Hybridization: The pot-grown seedlings of 7042S at the coleoptiles to first-leaf stage were spray-inoculated with a sporangial suspension (5x105 sporangia mL-1) containing inocula in equal (1:1) proportion of Sg 139-4 and Sg 110-9. Fifty pots of 15 cm dia with 10 seedlings per pot were maintained and infected seedlings were grown for a month to obtain sufficient F1 oospores.

Establishment and evaluation of F1 progenies: Sixty days after inoculation, necrotic leaves from the infected plants were collected, dried and ground into powder. The leaf powder thus obtained contained F1-oospores. A low frequency of seedling infection from F1-oospores was obtained by adding 0.25 g of leaf powder containing oospores to the autoclaved soil contained in 15 cm dia pots that were sown with 7042S, 50 seeds pot-1. As infected seedlings occurred infrequently and rarely, each infected seedling was assumed to have resulted from infection by single oospore. Sporangial inoculum from each seedling was maintained separately on 7042S as an individual F1 progeny isolate in a polyacrylic isolation chamber (60x60x90cm) in a greenhouse at 25±2°C. A total of 33 F1 progeny isolates were established and each progeny isolate was tested for its virulence phenotype (pathogenicity reaction) by inoculating 100-120 pot-grown seedlings of the tester host genotype, IP 18292 and 100-120 pot-grown seedlings of the maintainer host genotype 7042S. Each time a group of F1 progeny isolates (usually 10) along with their parental isolates, Sg 139-4 and Sg 110-9 were tested for comparison, convenience of handling and data recording. Because the downy mildew infection is systemic, data were recorded for the percentage of seedlings infected two weeks after inoculation.

Establishment and evaluation of F2 progenies: The F1 progeny isolates were allowed to produce oospores on 7042S until 60 days after inoculation. Since all the F1 progeny isolates exhibited avirulent reaction on the tester host genotype IP 18292, the necrotic leaves from 7042S collected for all the F1 progeny isolates were bulked, dried and ground into leaf powder, which contained F2-oospores. From these F2-oospores, F2-sporangia were obtained on 7042S as described above. A total of 230 single-oospore F2 progeny isolates were established and maintained, separately on seedlings of 7042S in isolation chambers in the greenhouses.

Each F2 progeny isolate was tested for its virulence phenotype in terms of disease incidence on 100-120 seedlings (2 pots) of the tester host genotype IP 18292 and 100-120 seedlings of the maintainer genotype 7042S. Based on disease incidence (DI) on IP 18292, the F2 progeny isolates were classified into either virulent (>10% DI) or avirulent (<10% DI) group. The data obtained were used to assess the segregation pattern. Each time the virulence phenotypes of a group of F2 progeny isolates (usually 10) with the two parental isolates, Sg 139-4 and Sg 110-9, were tested for the convenience of handling and data recording.

Backcrosses: Of the 33 F1 progeny isolates, two isolates with different compatible mating types were identified by hybridizing with the reference mating types[9] and crossed with the original parents of the complementary mating type by inoculating them onto seedlings of 7042S. Forty-six progeny isolates from backcross 1 (F1 x Sg 110-9) and 62 progeny isolates from backcross 2 (F1 x Sg 139-4) that produced oospores were recovered. From these asexual progenies (sporangial inocula) were raised on 7042S and evaluated for virulence phenotype on the tester host genotype, IP 18292.

A schematic representation of various steps involved in the study is presented in Fig. 1 and the number of seedlings inoculated in Table 1.

Statistical analysis: The goodness-of-fit of the segregation ratio of virulence phenotypes and avirulence phenotypes to the theoretical ratio was tested using Chi-square analysis[24].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Evaluation for virulence: The parental and the F1, F2, BC1 and BC2 progeny isolates were evaluated for virulence phenotype on the tester host genotype IP 18292 and the maintainer host genotype 7042S. The two parental isolates, Sg 139-4 and Sg 110-9 caused 97.4% and 0.0% incidence, respectively on IP 18292 and 95.6 and 94.7%, respectively on 7042S (Table 1). These remained true to their virulent and avirulent types. All the 33 F1 progeny isolates caused no disease on the tester genotype IP 18292 and thus remained avirulent, while these caused 96.1% incidence on 7042S. The 230 F2 progeny isolates caused mean disease incidence of 20.5% on IP 18292 and 92.5% on 7042S (Table 1). Based on the frequency distribution for disease causing potential on IP 18292, the 230 isolates were classified into 177 avirulent and 53 virulent with incidence ranging from 51.0 to 100.0% (Table 2).

Table 1: Details of seedlings inoculated by Sclerospora graminicola isolates and the percentage seedlings infected
*Plastic pots 15 cm dia with 50-60 seedlings per pot, thinned to 10 seedlings per pot after recording disease reaction and maintained until 60 days after sowing to obtain sexual (oospores) for F1 and F2 generations

Table 2: Disease incidence range and frequency of virulent/avirulent phenotypes in F2 generation
Av = Avirulent with ≤10% incidence; v = virulent with >10% incidence

Fig. 1: Schematic representation of inheritance of a virulence study in Sclerospora graminicola

This segregation ratio of 177 avirulent: 53 virulent did not differ significantly from the Mendelian single gene inheritance ratio of 3:1 (χ2 3:1= 0.46, P>0.01) (Table 3). The 46 BC1 progeny isolates (F1 x P1) did not cause disease on IP 18292 and remained truly avirulent, while they caused 96% incidence on 7042S (Table 1). However, the 62 BC2 (F1 x P2) progenies caused 49.1% disease on IP 18292 (Table 1) and they segregated into 28 avirulent: 34 virulent which showed a good fit to a 1:1 segregation ratio (χ2 1:1 = 0.58, p>0.01) (Table 3).

Table 3: Observed and expected segregation of virulence phenotypes of F1, F2, BC1 and BC2 progeny isolates of Sclerospora graminicola together with assumed genotypes
A: Dominant avirulent allele, a: Recessive virulent allele, χ2: Values are not significant (p>0.01)

Thus the monogenic segregation pattern (3:1) of F2 generation was supported by the segregation ratios obtained in BC1 (no segregation) and BC2 (1:1 segregation) generations.

Inheritance of avirulence: It is evident from the results that the specific virulence in pathogen isolates Sg 139-4 and Sg 110-9 to match the resistance in IP 18292, seems to be determined by a pair of alleles (A/a) at a single locus with avirulence being dominant over virulence (Table 3). The segregation pattern also suggests that, the parents are homozygous and the F1s are heterozygous at this locus. The avirulent parent Sg 110-9 and the virulent parent Sg 139-4 assumed to have homozygous dominant alleles for avirulence (AA) and homozygous recessive alleles for virulence (aa), respectively, to the tester host genotype IP 18292. The probable genotypes of parents, F1, F2, BC1 and BC2 generation isolates are given in Table 3. This is the first study on inheritance of avirulence in the S. graminicola and P glaucum system. These results are in broad agreement with earlier studies on different host-pathogen systems, which have shown that specific avirulence in specialized biotrophic pathogens is usually controlled by single dominant genes[25,26]. Similar observations on dominance of avirulence over virulence have also been reported for the inheritance of specific virulence in B. lactucae, the downy mildew pathogen of lettuce[21,22,27,28].

The results provide clear evidence in support of a true gene-for-gene relationship between S. graminicola and P. glaucum. These findings are in conformity with the earlier reports of gene-for-gene relationship in several other host-parasite associations, such as that between B. lactucae and lettuce[22], Phytophthora infestans and potato[29] and M. lini and flax[30,31]. In contrast to a major R-gene (Sgr1) in IP 18292 offering complete resistance to a specific pathotype[13], several QTL for resistance against diverse pathotypes of S. graminicola in different pearl millet genotypes have been identified[1,32]. Thus virulence/resistance in S. graminicola-pearl millet system could be both qualitative and quantitative depending on the pathotype isolate and the host genotype combinations.

The lack of segregation for virulence in the F1 generation provides further evidence that S. graminicola is diploid in the vegetative phase rather than haploid or polyploid. These findings are similar to those reported by Michelmore et al.[22] in case of B. lactucae and by Tommerup[33] in several other oomycetes. Further studies using other pathotype isolates of S. graminicola would be needed to better understand the genetics and virulence mechanisms in the pearl millet-S. graminicola system.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank V.P. Rao and other staff of pearl millet downy mildew team for their help during the experimentation at ICRISAT. The senior author thanks ICRISAT for allowing her to conduct her Ph.D Thesis research and providing her all support and facilities.

REFERENCES

  • Thakur, R.P. and C.T. Hash, 2004. Biotechnology in the Management of Pearl Millet Downy Mildew. In: Biotechnological Approaches for the Integrated Management of Crop Diseases, Mayee, C.D., C. Manoharachary, K.V.B.R. Tilak, D.S. Mukudam and J. Deshpande (Eds.). Daya Publishing House, New Delhi, PP: 247-261


  • Singh, S.D., R. Gopinath and M.N. Pawar, 1987. Effects of environmental factors in asexual sporulation of Sclerospora graminicola. Ind. Phytopathol., 40: 186-193.


  • Thakur, R.P., 1999. Pathogen diversity and plant disease management. Indian Phytopathol., 52: 1-9.
    Direct Link    


  • Thakur, R.P., V.P. Rao, J.G. Sastry, S. Sivaramakrishnan, K.N. Amruthesh and L.D. Barbind, 1999. Evidence for a new virulent pathotype of Sclerospora graminicola on pearl millet. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol., 29: 61-69.


  • Rao, V.P., C. Lukose, D.L. Kadwani and R.P. Thakur, 2002. Pearl millet downy mildew in Gujarat. Int. Sorghum Millets Newslett., 43: 95-96.


  • Thakur, R.P., V.P. Rao VP, K.N. Amruthesh, H.S. Shetty and V.V. Datar, 2003. Field surveys of pearl millet downy mildew, effects of hybrids, fungicide and cropping sequence. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol., 33: 387-394.


  • Michelmore, R.W., M.N. Pawar and R.J. Williams, 1982. Heterothallism in Sclerospora graminicola. Phytopathology, 72: 1368-1372.


  • Ball, S.L., D.J. Pike and C.V. Burridge, 1986. Characterization of populations of Sclerospora graminicola. Ann. Applied Biol., 108: 519-526.


  • Pushpavathi, B., 2003. Pathogenic and genetic diversity in populations of Sclerospora graminicola, the incitant of downy mildew in pearl millet. Ph.D. Thesis, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, India, pp: 110.


  • Thakur, R.P., K.G. Shetty and S.B. King, 1992. Selection for host-specific virulence in asexual populations of Sclerospora graminicola. Plant Pathol., 41: 626-632.


  • Sivaramakrishna, S., R.P. Thakur, S. Kannan and V.P. Rao, 2003. Pathogenic and genetic diversity among Indian isolates of Sclerospora graminicola. Ind. Phytopathol., 56: 392-397.


  • Singh, S.D. and B.S. Talukdar, 1998. Inheritance of complete resistance to pearl millet downy mildew. Plant Dis., 82: 791-793.


  • Singh, F., R.M. Singh, R.B. Singh and R.K. Singh, 1980. Genetic Studies of Downy Mildew Resistance in Pearl Millet. In: Trends in Genetical Research of Pennisetum, Gupta, V.P. and J.L. Minocha (Eds.). Wesley Press, Ludhiana, India, pp: 171-172


  • Deswal, D.P. and O.P. Govila, 1994. Genetics of resistance to downy mildew (Sclerospora graminicola) in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum). Ind. J. Agric. Sci., 64: 661-663.


  • Hash, C.T. and J.R. Witcombe, 2002. Gene Management and Breeding for Downy Mildew Resistance. In: Sorghum and Millets Diseases, Leslie, J.f. (Ed.). Iowa State Press, Ames, Iowa, USA., pp: 27-36


  • Jones, E.S., C.J. Liu, M.D. Gale, C.T. Hash and J.R. Witcombe, 1995. Mapping quantitative trait loci for downy mildew resistance in pearl millet. Theor. Applied Genet., 91: 448-456.


  • Flor, H.H., 1955. Host-parasite interaction in flax rust-its genetics and other implications. Phytopathology, 45: 680-685.


  • Person, C. and G. Sidhu, 1971. Genetics of host-parasite interrelationships. Proceedings of the Symposium on Mutation Breeding for Disease Resistance, (SMBDR'1971), International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp: 31-38.


  • Lim, S.M., J.G. Kinsey and A.L. Hooker, 1974. Inheritance of virulence in Helminthosporium turcicum to monogenic resistant corn. Phytopathology, 64: 1150-1151.


  • Norwood, J.M., R.W. Michelmore, I.R. Crute and D.S. Ingram, 1983. The inheritance of specific virulence in Bremia lactucae (Downy mildew) to match resistance-factors 1, 2, 4, 6 and 11 in Lactuca sativa (Lettuce). Plant Pathol., 32: 177-186.


  • Michelmore, R.W., J.M. Norwood, D.S. Ingram, I.R. Crute and P. Nicholson, 1984. The inheritance of virulence in Bremia lactucae to match resistant factors 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10 and 11 in lettuce (Lactuca sativa). Plant Pathol., 33: 301-315.


  • Thakur, R.P., B. Pushpavathi and V.P. Rao, 1998. Virulence characterization of single-zoospore isolates of Sclerospora graminicola from pearl millet. Plant Dis., 82: 747-751.


  • Panse, V.G. and P.V. Sukhatme, 1978. Statistical Methods for Agricultural Workers. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, India, Pages: 347


  • Day, P.R., 1974. Genetics of Host-Parasite Interactions. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, pp: 238


  • Ellingboe, A.H., 1981. Changing concepts in host-pathogen genetics. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 19: 125-143.
    Direct Link    


  • Crute, I.R., 1987. Genetic Studies with Bremia Lactucae (Lettuce Downy Mildew) In: Genetics and Plant Pathogens, Day, P.R and G.J. Jellis (Eds.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp: 207-219.


  • Al-Kherb, S.M., C. Fininsa, R.C. Shattock and D.S. Shaw, 1995. The inheritance of virulence of Phytophthora infestans to potato. Plant Pathol., 44: 552-562.


  • Flor, H.H., 1965. Tests for allelism of rust-resistance genes in flax. Crop Sci., 5: 415-418.


  • Statler, G.D., 1990. Inheritance of pathogenicity of progeny from an F1 culture of Melampsora lini. J. Phytopathol., 128: 184-190.


  • Jones, E.S., W.A. Breese, C.J. Liu, S.D. Singh, D.S. Shaw and J.R. Witcombe, 2002. The mapping quantitative trait loci for resistance to downy mildew in pearl millet: Field and glasshouse screens detect to the same QTL. Crop Sci., 42: 1316-1323.


  • Tommerup, I.C., 1981. Cytology and Genetics of Downy Mildews. In: The Downy Mildews, Spencer, D.M. (Ed). Academic Press, London, New York, pp: 122-142.


  • Thakur, R.P., S. Sivaramakrishnan, S. Kannan, V.P. Rao, D.E. Hess and C.W. Magill, 2004. Genetic and Pathogenic Variability among Isolates of Sclerospora graminicola, the Downy Mildew Pathogen of Pearl Millet. Academic Publishers, Kluwer, pp: 179-192


  • Michelmore, R.W., T.W. Ilott, S.H. Hulbert and B.F. Farrara, 1988. The Downy Mildews. In: Advances in Plant Pathology, Sidhu, G., D.S. Ingram and P.H. Williams (Eds.). Academic Press, London, pp: 53-79

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved