HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Plant Pathology Journal

Year: 2005 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 1 | Page No.: 61-68
DOI: 10.3923/ppj.2005.61.68
Nematicidal, Antifungal and Phytotoxic Responses of Coryza canadensis
S.S. Shaukat, I.A. Siddiqui and Nadia Munir

Abstract: The study was carried out during June-September 2001 at the Department of Botany, University of Karachi. Present investigation concluded that aqueous extract of Conyza canadensis had no significant impact on egg hatch of Meloidogyne javanica in vitro. However, aqueous extract of C. canadensis caused considerable mortality of M. javanica juveniles at 24 h but not at 48 h. Ethanolic extract of powdered shoot of C. canadensis did not exert any inhibitory effect on radial growth of root-infecting fungi including Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium solani and Rhizoctonia solani in vitro. Soil amendment with powdered shoot of C. canadensis at 5% concentration significantly reduced galling due to M. javanica in mungbean roots grown in non-sterilized soil but not in sterilized soil. C. canadensis at 2.5% concentration did not affect root-knot development in either of the soil types tested. Soil amendment with 5% C. canadensis in non-sterilized soil markedly reduced plant height and fresh weight of mungbean shoots. Fresh root weights were markedly lowered, in both sterilized and non-sterilized soil, amended with 5% C. canadensis. C. canadensis suppresses root-knot nematode disease indirectly by enhancing soil microbial assemblages, particularly the microfungi antagonistic to root-knot nematodes.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
S.S. Shaukat, I.A. Siddiqui and Nadia Munir, 2005. Nematicidal, Antifungal and Phytotoxic Responses of Coryza canadensis. Plant Pathology Journal, 4: 61-68.

Keywords: .

INTRODUCTION

Soil-borne plant pathogens cause hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars of economic losses to agricultural crops[1]. When cultivars with disease resistance are lacking, growers have only soil fumigants as guaranteed means for disease control. These products are highly effective, providing broad-spectrum disease control with rapid turnaround time from application to planting. Replacement technologies should posses these desirable traits. Fumigants, however, are expensive and their use can result in development of new disease problems requiring further fumigation. Replacement technologies can compete if they are less costly and if they provide long-term disease suppression.

Organic amendments, such as animal manures and composts, are commonly used in agricultural production for their fertility value prior to the availability of chemical fertilizers. It is likely that these amendments also provide other benefits such as improved plant health due to reduction of pathogens[1]. The efficacy of botanical toxicants against plant-parasitic nematodes and soil-borne fungi has been investigated under glasshouse conditions[2,3]. Of the various plants tested, Tegetes spp., produce α-terthienyl while Crotalaria spp. produce mono-crotaline, both these compounds possess nematicidal properties[4,5]. Likewise, Ali et al.[6] observed that methanolic extracts of Lantana camara induced significant mortality of M. javanica juveniles in vitro[6]. In another study, Shaukat and Siddiqui[2] found that L. camara also possesses antifungal agents, which inhibit radial growth of root-infecting fungi including Macrophomina phaseolipa, Fusarium solani and Rhizoctonia solani in vitro. Shaukat et al.[3] further demonstrated that aqueous extract of powdered shoot of Argemone mexicana contains a number of nematicidal compounds (phenolic acids including salicylic acid) which caused substantial mortality of M. javanica juveniles in vitro. The efficacy of the organic derivatives depends on their chemical composition and the type of microorganisms that develop during degradation[7]. Several antimicrobial compounds (e.g, organic acids, hydrogen sulfide, nitrogenous ammonia, phenols, tannins) are released during degradation of organic amendments, or synthesized by microorganism involved in such degradation[8].

The formal definition of allelopathy is any direct or indirect harmful or beneficial effect by one plant (including microorganisms) on another through production of chemical compounds that escape into the environment[9]. Reduction in populations and infection of deleterious microorganisms following soil amendments with plant material is thought to be due to the release of toxic compounds, inhibitory to pathogens, in such environments. However whether suppressiveness occurs primarily due to the release of toxic coynpound(s) in the vicinity of the pathogen cannot be established until the active compound(s) from the rhizosphere and root is isolated and activity of the compound(s) proven. Alternatively, stimulation or suppression of soil microorganisms inhibitory to plant pathogens and enhancement of host defence mechanism are the factors that may hinder the build-up of populations of deleterious soil organisms.

The aims of the present investigation were: I) to determine the influence of aqueous extract of Coryza canadensis on egg hatch and mortality of M. Javanica in vitro, ii) to determine the effect of methanolic extract of C. canadensis on radial growth of root infecting fungi including Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium solani and Rhizoctonia solani in vitro, iii) to determine the influence of soil amendment with C. canadensis on root infection caused by root-knot nematode and root-infecting fungi and growth of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] and iv) to determine the influence of the organic amendment on the diversity of culturable soil fungi in the rhizosphere of mungbean.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material and preparation of shoot extract: The study was conducted during July-September 2001 at the Department of Botany, University of Karachi. C. canadensis was collected from Karachi University Campus. The plant was air dried under shade for 2 weeks and finally chopped to small pieces in an electric grinder (Electra mini chopper, Japan). The chopped shoot material (50 g) was soaked in 500 mL sterile distilled water and left for 72 h at room temperature. The resulting aqueous extract was passed through two layers of Whatman No. 1 filter paper and kept in a refrigerator at 6°C prior to use. Appropriate quantities of the antibiotic were added to the extract to avoid microbial contamination.

Nematode and fungal inoculum: Meloidogyne javanica (Treub) Chitw. was obtained from pure cultures maintained on roots of eggplants (Solanum melongena L.). The heavily infested root pieces with large number of cream coloured egg masses were kept in 50 mL sterile distilled water for 4 to 5 days. The hatched juveniles were stored in 100 mL capacity beaker. Eggs were extracted by vigorous shaking of infested roots in a 1% sodium hypochlorite solution for three minutes. The resulting suspension was then passed through a range of different mesh sieves. The eggs collected on a fine sieve (38 μm) were washed in tap water to remove all traces of sodium hypochlorite before use. Macrophomina phaseolina was isolated from infected bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) roots grown at Ghulamullah Goth, 62 km east of Karachi while Rhizoctonia solani and Fusarium solani, respectively, were isolated from infected tomato and brinjal roots obtained from Mirpur Sakro, 69 km east of Karachi. The fangi were purified on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) plates supplemented with penicillin and streptomycin sulphate.

Effect of shoot extract on egg hatch of M. javanica: Two medium sized egg masses with 2 mL of the aqueous extract of C. canadensis were transferred into a 3 cm diam cavity glass slide. The egg masses placed in sterile distilled water served as controls. Each treatment was replicated four times and the cavity glass slides were randomized. The hatched juveniles were counted after 48 h. Subsequently, the egg masses were transferred into cavity glass slides containing 2 mL sterile distilled water to ascertain whether the egg masses kept in the culture filtrate had been temporarily or permanently inactivated. The juveniles were counted again after a further 48 h period.

Effect of shoot extract on mortality of M. Javanica juveniles: Two mililiter of each filtrate were poured in a glass cavity slide and about 45±6 second-stage juveniles (J2) of M. javanica placed in each glass cavity slide. Juveniles kept in sterile distilled water served as controls. Treatments and controls were replicated three times and dead nematodes in each cavity slide were counted after 24 and 48 h. The nematodes were considered to be dead when they did not move on probing with a fine needle.

Preparation of ethanolic extract and its antifungal activity: Fifty gram fresh leaves of C. canadensis were soaked in 100 mL ethanol and disintegrated in a homogenizer. After 2 weeks, ethanoilic extract was filtered through 2 layers of Whatman No. I filter paper. The extract was dried in a rotary vacuum evaporator (EYELA) under reduced pressure at 30°C. The resulting gummy substance was weighed an dissolved in ethanol. To determine the antifungal activity, the extract (10 mg mL-1) was impregnated on a 5 mm diam disc of Whatman No. 1 filter paper at 10 μL disc-1 and placed 5 ram inside of the 9 cm diam petri plates containing Czapek Dox agar medium, pH 7.2. Disc inoculated with ethanol served as control,, was placed apart from the disc containing ethanolic extract of C. canadensis. A 5 mm diam disc of the test fungus was placed at the center of the petri plate.

There were four replicates for each test fungus and plates were incubated at room temperature (30°C). Zone of inhibition (if any) was measured after a one week incubation period.

Nematicidal, antifungal and allelopathic responses of Conyza canadensis in mungbean: The sandy loam soil (pH 7.8 and moisture holding capacity 38%) was obtained from Crop Disease Research Institute, Karachi University campus. The experiment was set up as a randomized complete block design with four replications. The soil was thoroughly mixed with C. canadensis at 3% w/w and filled in 8 cm diam plastic pots at 400 g pot-1. The pots with soil were placed in a glasshouse (20-29°C) and sprinkled daily with 40 mL sterile distilled water. Three week after amendment, eight surface sterilized mungbean seeds were sown in each pot and after germination only four seedlings were kept pot-1. One week after germination, 2000 freshly hatched juveniles of M. javanica were introduced in the soil by making four holes around the seedlings in the pots. The plants were fertilized at alternate weeks with 0.8 g kg-1 of urea. The experiment was terminated 45 days after nematode inoculation and plant height, fresh weight of shoot and root, number of galls induced by M. Javanica and nematode populations in the soil were estimated. For nematode counts, 100 cm3 soil aliquots were incubated for 72 h using a modified Baerman funnel technique[10]. An identical experiment was performed with the exception that steam-sterilized soil was used. The soil was tested for the presence or absence of the microbial population before filling the pots; soil with no microbial population was used for the experiment.

Isolation and identification of fungi from rhizosphere: At harvest, one mungbean plant was randomly chosen from each replicate pot to study the rhizosphere culturable fungi. The roots were excised and weighed after the excess soil had been shaken-off The roots were then shaken vigorously in a test tube containing sterile distilled water, blotted dry and reweighed. A serial dilution of the soil suspensions was prepared and was tested for the enumeration of fungi. A 0.5-mL aliquot from 102 and 103 dilutions was plated on Czapek’s Dox Agar (CDA) medium, supplemented with penicillin (100,000 units L-1) and streptomycin sulphate (0.2 g L-1) to avoid bacterial contamination. After incubation at 28°C, the plates were examined for total fungal counts. Most isolates were obtained after a few days of incubation, but plates-were checked over several weeks to allow isolation of slow-growing fungi. Developing fungal colonies were sub-cultured into pure isolates and identified by their microscopic morphology using mycological literature[11-13].

Isolation of fungi from roots: The roots of all plants (including the one which was tested for the isolation of rhizosphere fungi) were cut into small segments (5-mm) and after surface sterilization in 1% Ca(OCl)2 for 3 min, 5 such segments were plated onto Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) plates supplemented with penicillin (100,000 units L-1) and streptomycin sulphate (0.2 g L-1). The plates were incubated at 28°C for one week and emerging fungi from each root segment were identified. Colonization percentage was determined by using the following formula:

Statistical analyses: Data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by the Least Significant Differences test (LSD) or Duncan's multiple range test using STATISTICA software (ver. 5.0, StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.A.). Fungal rhizosphere populations were transformed to logio (x+l) before the analyses.

Diversity measurement: Species diversity is an important parameter of natural or organized community and several diversity indices have been proposed[14]. Diversity indices represent a useful means to quantify community diversity and have been instrumental in revealing the impact of biocontrol inoculants on resident population assemblages[15]. Several diversity indices were employed to compare treatment effects. Various diversity measures estimate different aspect of community structure. The general species diversity of the fungal communities was measured by the generally accepted Shannon-Wiener information theorv function:

where, H’ is the general species diversity and pi the proportion of total number of cfu for fungi or counts for nematodes, N belonging to the ith species[16]. The variance of general diversity var (H’) was calculated in accordance with Magurran[14], as follows:

Dominance concentration (complement of diversity) was measured by using Simpson's index[17] as: D = Σ{[ni(ni-1]/[N(N- 1]} in which ni = number of CFU for fungi or counts for nematodes. The general diversity incorporates two components of diversity: species richness, which expresses the number of species (S) as a function (ratio) of the total number of individuals (N) and equitability that measures the evenness of allotment of individuals among the species[14]. The equitability component of diversity and its variance were measured in accordance with Pielou[18]: J’ = H’/H’max. The equitability index Y is the ratio between observed diversity (H’) and maximal diversity (H’max). Variance of equitability was estimated as: Var (J’) = Var (H’)/(Iog S)2. Species richness was calculated in accordance with Menhinick[19] as d = S//N, where, S equals the number of species and N the total number of individuals (colony counts).

RESULTS

Effects of C. canadensis on egg hatch and mortality of C. canadensis juveniles and radial growth of root-infecting fungi in vitro: When compared with the control, egg hatch activity of M. javanica did not affect markedly when exposed to aqueous extract of C. canadensis (Table 1). However, when compared to the controls, egg hatch activity was significantly (p<0.05) reduced when egg masses were transferred from C. canadensis extract to sterile distilled water. Aqueous extract of C. canadensis caused significantly (p<0.05) mortality of M. javanica at 24 h exposure period, ompared to the controls (Table 2). However, at 48 h no significant difference on mortality of C. canadensis juveniles was detected over the controls. Ethanolic extract of C. Canadensis had no inhibitory effect on radial growth of any of the root-infecting fungi; colonies of fungi grew over disc impregnated with C. canadensis extract.

Effect of C. canadensis on the development of root-knot infection and the growth of mungbean: When compared with the controls, soil amendment with C. canadensis at 5% significantly (p<0.05) reduced galling on mungbean roots grown in non-sterilized soil (Table 3). However, in steam-sterilized soil, C. canadensis at any concentration did not reduce root-knot infection. When two soil types (sterilized and non-sterilized) were compared, root-knot infection was significantly (p<0.05) higher in sterilized soil amended with 5% C. candensis.

Table 1: Effects of C. canadensis on egg hatching of Meloidogyne javanica
aAfter a 48-h hatching period in culture filtrate, the egg masses were transferred to sterile distilled water

Table 2: Effects of aqueous extract of Conyza canadensis shoot extract on mortality of Meloidogyne javanica

Soil amendment with 5% C. canadensis in non-sterilized soil reduced plant height, compared to the controls while shoot material of C. canadensis had no, significant m pact on mungbean plant height in steam-sterilized soil. In both sterilized and non-sterilized soils, amendment with 5% C. canadensis significantly (p<0.05) reduced fresh weight of shoots. However, with respect to fresh shoot weight of mungbean plants, steam sterilized and non-sterilized soils did not differ markedly. In both sterilized and non-sterilized soils, C. canadensis at 5% concentration markedly (p<0.05) reduced fresh weight of root while in steam- sterilized soil, C. canadensis at 2.5% concentration enhanced root weights.

Effects of C. canadensis on culturable fungi in the mungbean rhizosphere: Regardless of amendments, a total of 15 fungal species belonging to 10 genera were isolated from the rhizosphere of mungbean (Table 4). When various treatments were compared, total fungal species and their colony counts were significantly (p<0.01) higher in soil amended with C. canadensis especially at higher concentration (i.e., 5%). Some fungal populations were either specifically enhanced or restrained following soil amendment with C. canadensis. For instance, Curvularia lunata, Penicillium brefeldianum and P. notatum were totally absent from unmended soil.

Table 3: Effects of C. canadensis on root-knot development due to Meloidogyne javanica and growth of mungbean plants in sterilized and non-sterilized soils
SS = Sterilized Soil; NSS = Non-sterilized Soil

Table 4: Effect of soil amendment with or without shoot powder of C. canadensis on soil fungal community structure expressed. as log, 0 (x+1) in mungbean

Table 5: General diversity H’, equitability (J’), species richness (d) and dominance (D) of the fungal communities affected by soil amendment with or without Conyza canadensis in mungbean rhizosphere. Var (H’)= variance of H’; Var (J’ ) = variance of J’.

Table 6: Percent colonization of the fungi isolated from the mungbean roots growing in soil amended with C. canadensis

On the other hand, all the fungal species, which were isolated from the rhizosphere of unamended soils were also isolated from C. canadensis amended soils but population level of Alternaria alternata was higher in unamended soils. Noticeably, colony counts for other species were markedly higher in amended soils. A few fungal species including Aspergillus flavus, A. niger, Fusarium solani and Alyrothecium sp. were isolated in negligible colony counts from steam sterilized soils (data not presented).

Effects of C. canadensis on the diversity of rhizosphere fungi: Highest general diversity (H’) of culturable soil fungi was recorded in 2.5% C. canadensis amendment (Table 5). However, doubling of the application rate reduced the general diversity compared to controls. Likewise, equitability was also highest in 2.5% C. canadensis amendment and lowest in 5% dosage. Species richness exhibited the same trend. On the other hand, Simpson's index of dominance concentration showed an opposite trend to diversity and the maximum value was recorded for 5% C. canadensis amendment.

Effects of C. canadensis on root colonization by fungi: Regardless of treatments, a total of five fungal species were isolated from the inner tissue of mungbean roots (Table 6). The percentage colonization of roots by Penicillium notatum and Rhizoctonia solani significantly (p<0.05) increased following soil amendment with C. canadensis, over the untreated controls, at both the concentrations. Root colonization by Fusarium solani was reduced at 5% C. canadensis while that of M. phaselina markedly increased at 2.5% C. canadensis. Interestingly, Alternaria alternata was exclusively isolated form the roots growing in the amended soils.

DISCUSSION

Present results indicate that aqueous extract of powdered shoot of C. canadensis inhibited egg hatch and caused appreciable mortality of C. canadensis juveniles C. canadensis. These results are in large part due to the fact that C. canadensis possesses compounds toxic to root-knot nematode. However, the nematicidal activity of the extract remained effective only during early incubation period (24 h) most likely due to fact that nematode might have overcome extract toxicity at a later incubation period (48 h). In the present study, whereas C. canadensis extract exhibited nematicidal activity to some extent, it did not inhibit radial growth of root-infecting fungi including M. phaseolina, F. solani and R. Solani in vitro. It is possible that either the compounds were not toxic to fungi and if present, might not have been soluble in ethanol. In our previous investigation[2], methanol extract of the leaf material of Argemone mexicana, a tropical weed, caused greater mortality of M. javanica juveniles than did ethyl acetate or hexane extracts. We suggested that active nematicidal compounds from A. mexicana were soluble in ethyl acetate and hence polar in nature.

In the current study, soil amendment with C. canadensis shoot material at 5% markedly suppressed nematode galling in mungbean roots. On the other hand, organic amendment below 5% failed to reduce nematode infection. Soil sterilization also plays a vital role in the disease suppression following organic amendments in the soil. For example, C. canadensis inhibited root-knot nematode galling efficiently in non sterilized soils compared to the steam-sterilized soils. These results clearly suggest that C. canadensis inhibits root-knot infection indirectly by enhancing antagonistic microflora in the amended soils. This notion was proved from the isolation of culturable mycobiota from C. canadensis amended soils. Soil amendment with C. canadensis harboured larger number of Fungal species with high colony forming units. Although the application of organic amendments in the field for control of nematode pests is generally for large-scale vegetable production, it is feasible to use these amendments in transplant mixes. Organic amendments that have demonstrated efficacy in reducing damage caused by root-knot and other nematodes include chitin, pine bark and hemicellulose[7,20-23]. Hemicellulosic waste, a product of the paper pulp industry generated by alkaline and bisulfate wood treatments that release cellulose, has been investigated as a soil amendment for nematode control[24]. Decomposing tissues of A. mexicana in soil at 30 or 50 g kg-1 of soil significantly reduced population densities of M. javanica in soil and root and inhibited root-knot development in tomato[2]. Nematicidal activity of organic amendments in soil can be attributed to chemical mineralization with the ultimate release of ammonia, increased nitrogen and carbon dioxide levels, lowered oxygen concentration, release of toxic compounds from plant tissues, or growth of fungi and bacteria antagonistic to nematodes. Shaukat and Siddiqui[25] demonstrated the nematicidal potential of a number of phenolic compounds.

In the present study, soil treatment with C. canadensis increased general diversity and equitability of the culturable soil fungi compared to the untreated controls. In general populations of soil fungi was higher in amended soils. Furthermore, a few fungal species were either enhanced or suppressed following C. canadensis applications in the soil. For example, Curvularia lunata, Penicillium brefeldianum and P. notatum were isolated exclusively from C. canadensis amended soils. On the other hand, population levels of Alternaria alternata were lowered following soil amendment. The exploitation of antagonistic activities by microorganisms decomposing organic amendments may be one of the important practical biocontrol tools that could be developed to manage plantparasitic nematodes[26]. The addition of organic matter to soil stimulates microbial populations of bacteria and fungi, some of which might be antagonistic to nematodes[27]. For instance, Shaukat and Siddiqui[2] observed that soil amendment with powdered shoot of Lantana camara caused soil suppressivness to M. javanica which was not related with the release of nematicidal compounds but the addition of plant material to soil altered the fungal community structure and composition that could indirectly influence the nematode population. Shaukat et al.[28] demonstrated that fungal species diversity and equitability declined with the passage of time following soil amendment with Avicennia marina, but species richness slightly increased in the amended soils. Chavarria-Carvajal et al.[29] studying the effects of combinations of organic amendments and an aromatic compound benzaldehyde for the suppression of plant parasitic nematodes found that most amendments reduced damage from nematodes. Also, it was observed that amendments exerted a selective action on the activity and composition of microbial populations in the soybean rhizosphere. Caffeic acid, a phenolic compound, when used in conjunction with aromatic aldehyde (benzaldehyde) exhibited considerable activity against M. javanica populations, also the combination of two compounds markedly reduced population density of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a plant disease suppressive bacterium[30] However, manipulation of desirable microbial community, a phenomenon referred to as induced suppressiveness, for the control of plant-parasitic nematodes in response to C. canadensis may have practical limitations. One limitation in this regard is that the development of antagonistic microbial community requires multiple years of crop monoculture[31,32]. Stirling[33] stated that with efforts to induce nematode-suppressive soils, the long cropping cycle allowed for considerable nematode damage before suppressiveness developed. In addition, Stirling[33] indicated that all documented examples of effective natural suppression of plant parasitic nematodes appear to be due mainly to the action of one or two specific biological control, agents and that these are highly host specific.

Phytotoxicity levels for the amendments tested are known for a number of crops and this information provides a framework for initial studies with amendments for tomato[20,22,24]. In the present study, soil amendment with 5% C. canadensis substantially reduced plant height and fresh weight of shoots of mungbean while 2.5% C. canadensis did not alter plant growth. Rates of amendments are also important, as levels above 1% with chitin[21,34] and 5% with pine bark[22] are phytotoxic to certain crops including summer squash and soybean, respectively. Similarly, soil amendment with 50 g kg-1 of soil of A. mexicana was highly deleterious causing 80% mortality of tomato plants[2]. Aqueous extract of C. canadensis inhibited the germination, root and shoot growth of six test plants including tomato, radish, wheat, corn, millet and mungbean. In the same study, decaying shoot of C. canadensis in sandy-loam soil at 5, 10 or 20 g/400 soil, substantially inhibited germination and seedling growth of bulrush millet[9]. Chromatography of the shoot extract of C. canadensis disclosed the presence of four phenolic compounds including gallic acid, vanillic acid, catechol and syringic acid[9]. Our previous and current investigations clearly suggest that C. canadensis contains a variety of phenolic allelochernicals that may interfere with the normal growth of crop plants as well as their associated microorganisms.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We wish to express our sincere thanks to Nasima Imam Ali and Zarina Ali for providing technical assistance.

REFERENCES

  • Lazarovits, G., 2001. Management of soil-borne plant pathogens with organic soil amendments: A disease control strategy salvaged from the past. Can. J. Plant. Pathol., 23: 1-7.
    Direct Link    


  • Shaukat, S.S. and I.A. Siddiqui, 2001. Lantana camara in the soil changes the fungal community structure and reduces impact of Meloidogyne javnica on mungbean. Phytopathol. Medit., 40: 245-252.


  • Shaukat, S.S., I.A. Siddiqui, G.H. Khan and M.J. Zaki, 2002. Nematicidal and allelopathic potential of Argemone mexicana, a tropical weed. Plant Soil, 245: 239-247.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fassuliotis, G. and G.P. Skucas, 1969. The effect of pyrrolizidine alkaloid ester and plants containing pyrrolizidine on Meloidogyne incognita acrita. J. Nematol., 1: 287-288.


  • Ali, N.I., I.A. Siddiqui, M.J. Zaki and S.S. Shaukat, 2002. Nematicidal potential of Lantana camara against Meloidogyne jcnanica in mungbean. Nematol. Medit., 29: 99-102.


  • Rodriguez-Kabana, R., G. Morgan-Jones and I. Clift 1987. Biological control of nematodes: Soil amendments and microbial antagonists. Plant Soil, 100: 237-247.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rodriguez-Kabana, R., V. Estaun, J. Pino-Chet and O. Marfo, 1995. Mixtures of olive pomace with different nitrogen sources for the control of Meloidogyne sp. on tomato. J. Nematol., 27: 575-584.
    Direct Link    


  • Shaukat, S.S., N. Munir and I.A. Siddiqui, 2003. Allelopathic responses of Conyza canadensis (L.) cronquist: A cosmopolitan weed. Asian J. Plant Sci., 2: 1034-1039.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rodriguez-KAbana, R. and M.H. Pope, 1981. A simple method for the extraction of nematodes from soil. Nematropica, 11: 175-186.
    Direct Link    


  • Booth, C., 1971. The Genus Fusarium. Commonwealth. Mycological Institute, Kew Surey LJK, pp: 237


  • Domsch, K.H., W. Gams and T.H. Anderson, 1980. Compendium of Soil Fungi. Academic Press, London, United Kingdom, ISBN: 9780122204012, Pages: 1264
    Direct Link    


  • Thom, C., 1945. A Manual of Aspergilli. The Williams and Wilkins Co., USA., pp: 373
    Direct Link    


  • Magurran, A.E., 1988. Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Croom Helm Ltd., London, UK., Pages: 179


  • Natsch, A., C. Keel, N. Hebecker, E. Laasik and G. Mago, 1997. Influence of biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens CHAO and its antibiotic overproducing derivative on the diversity of resident root colonizing pseudomonads. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 23: 341-352.
    Direct Link    


  • Shannon, C.E. and W. Weaver, 1963. The Mathematical Theory of Communications. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, USA., pp: 367


  • Southwood, T.R.E. and P.A. Herinderson 2000. Ecological Methods. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, pp: 575


  • Pielou, E.C., 1975. Ecological Diversity. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, Pages: 165


  • Menhinick, E.F., 1964. A comparison of some species-individuals diversity indices applied to samples of field insects. Ecology, 45: 859-861.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Culbreath, A.K., R. Rodriguez-Kabana and G. Morgan-Jones, 1985. The use of hemicellulose waste matter for reduction of the phytotoxic effects of chitin and control of root-knot nematodes. Nernatropica, 15: 49-75.


  • Godoy, G.R., R.A. Rodriguez, R.A. Shelly and G. Morgan-Jones, 1983. Chitin amendments for control of Meloidogyne arenaria in infsted soil. 11: Effects on microbial populations. Nematropica, 13: 63-74.


  • Kokalis-Burelle, N., R. Rodriguez-Kabana, C.F. Weaver and P.S. King, 1994. Evaluation of powdered pine bark for control of Meloidogyne arenaria on Soybean. Plant and Soil, 162: 163-168.
    Direct Link    


  • Rodriguez-Kabana, R., G. Godoy, G. Morgan-Jones and R.A. Shelly, 1983. The determination of soil chitinase activity: Conditions for assay and ecological studies. Plant Soil, 75: 95-106.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Huebner, R.A., R. Rodfiguez-Kabana and R.M. Patterson, 1983. Hemicellulose waste and urea for control of plant-parasitic nematodes: Effect on soil enzyme activities. Nematropica, 13: 37-54.


  • Shaukat, S.S. and I.A. Siddiqui, 2001. Effect of some phenolic compounds on survival, infectivity and population density of Meloidogyne javanica in mungbean. Nematol. Medit., 29: 123-126.
    Direct Link    


  • Shaukat, S.S., I.A. Siddiqui and F.S. Mehdi, 2003. Avicennia marina (mangrove) soil amendment changes the fungal community in the rhizosphere and root tissue of mungbean and contributes to control of root-knot nematodes. Phytopathol. Medit., 42: 135-140.
    Direct Link    


  • Chavarria-Carvaial, J.A., R. Rodriguez-Kdbana, J.W. Kloepper and G. MorganJones, 2001. Changes in populations of microorganisms associated with organic amendments and benzaldehyde to control plant-parasitic nematodes. Nematropica, 31: 165-180.


  • Siddiqui, I.A. and S.S. Shaukat, 2002. Effect of phenolic acids and an aromatic aldehyde on infectivity of Meloidogjyne javanica and colonization by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Mungbean. Nematol. Medit., 30: 119-125.


  • Hornby, D., 1983. Suppressive soils. Ann. Rev. Phytopathol., 21: 65-85.
    Direct Link    


  • Cook, R.J. and K.F. Baker, 1983. The Nature and Practice of Biological Control. APS Press, ISBN: 0890540535 Saint Paul, Minnesota
    Direct Link    


  • Stirling, G.S., 1991. Biological Control of Plant Parasitic Nematodes: Progress Problems and Prospects. CAB International, Walling-Ford, UK., ISBN: 0851987036, pp: 235-274


  • Mian, I.H., G. Godoy, R.A. Shelly, R. Rodriguez-Kabana and G. Morgan-Jones, 1982. Chitin amendments for Meloidogyne arenaria in infested soils. Nematropica, 12: 71-84.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved