HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2020 | Volume: 23 | Issue: 12 | Page No.: 1539-1550
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2020.1539.1550
Genetic Variation Analysis for Breeding Purposes in Wild and Cultivated Sunflower Germplasm (Helianthus annuus Sp.)
Maissa M. Morsi, , Hala M. Abdelmgid and Doaa M. Hammad

Abstract: Background and Objective: Molecular genetic methods show conclusive turn in phylogeny investigations and therefore, understanding the allocation and extension of genetic diversity inside and among species. The current study aims to evaluate genetic diversity using molecular markers (5 SSR and 5 ISSR) on 13 sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) genotypes from different regions. Materials and Methods: The data acquired with the highest degree of polymorphism were confirmed. Polymorphic bands (24 and 55) were demonstrated totally through SSR and ISSR, respectively. Nevertheless, ISSR was superior in exhibiting polymorphism rate (97.37%) compared to SSR markers (90.83%). A range from 2-21 of amplified fragments, with molecular weights varying from 34-1331 bp, was noticeable. The genetic similarity coefficient was employed to set UPGMA dendrogram. Results: Dissimilarity was found in genotypes clustering within groups, whilst the manner of clustering in genotypes kept adjacent in ISSR and aggregated results of SSR and ISSR. Dice similarity ranged from 0.058-0.792, 0.168-0.770 and 0.154-0.847 with SSR, ISSR and the combined phylogeny dendrogram, respectively. The genetic variance of sunflower accessions of wild and cultivated cultivars from different geographic regions was established. Conclusion: Knowledge of these results could be applied to confirm a wide genetic basis for outlook sunflower and manage germplasm breeding programs.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Maissa M. Morsi,, Hala M. Abdelmgid and Doaa M. Hammad, 2020. Genetic Variation Analysis for Breeding Purposes in Wild and Cultivated Sunflower Germplasm (Helianthus annuus Sp.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 23: 1539-1550.

Keywords: clustering, genotypes, polymorphism, phylogeny, Molecular marker and dice similarity

INTRODUCTION

Investigating the levels and patterns of genetic diversity of invasive plant species is crucial to understand the ecological factors promoting invasions and for better pre-breeding strategies in breeding field crops. Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.), is one of the most important crops in the world grown for edible oil, belongs to the family Asteraceae family. Funk et al.1 reported that species of Asteraceae family exist in a wide range of environments including deserts, forests, wetlands, salt marshlands and cultivated meadows2. Currently, cultivated sunflower (H. annuus L.) is ranked as the fourth most important vegetable oil crop in the world3. The plant is extremely cross-pollinated, annual and diploid (2n = 2x = 34). Variability of speciation mechanisms makes it a perfect model system for molecular genetic studies on speciation and adaptation4-7.

Common sunflower is a widely distributed herb whose native geographic range is centered in the central United States and Canada8. Sunflower is presumed to has been domesticated by Native Americans who primarily used it as a source of edible seed. It has been introduced to Europe in the early 16th century9, where it was grown as an ornamental plant. Then, progressive use of sunflowers as a vegetable oil source arisen, which led to its cultivation on a large scale in Eastern Europe. Even though cultivated sunflower has undergone varied evolutionary history, it showed a narrow genetic diversity compared to wild sunflower. Increasing genetic diversity is a special interest of sunflower breeders for developing genetic resources with high oil and seed yield as well as resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses10. Evaluating genetic variance and elucidating the phylogenetic relations in germplasm sets promotes the genetic improvement and effective germplasm management11-14.

Evaluation of genetic diversity of sunflower germplasm via various molecular markers is very important in sunflower breeding programs15-16. DNA markers, which are available throughout the genome are unlimited in number and do not influence by environments or epistasis15,17,18. Genetic characterization of wild and cultivated sunflower based on DNA markers would be helpful to examine variance patterns within the species19-23.

Simple sequence repeats (SSRs) or microsatellites exist in the eukaryotic genome, distinguished by broad allocation, high polymorphism, co-dominance and repeatability have been considerably used for genetic tests all over the world24-27. SSR markers have been proved as suitable markers for genetic variation analysis of sunflower hybrids as well as populations from diverse geographical areas28-30.

Inter-Simple Sequence Repeat (ISSR) markers have been extremely utilized to assess the genetic variation of diverse plant species. ISSR markers survey numerous positions simultaneously all over the genome, providing an extremely beneficial marker for diversity analysis and fingerprinting31. Drine et al.32 and Shehata et al.33 studied different barley accessions and concluded that ISSR revealed more genetic diversity, compared to RAPD. ISSR was one of the preliminary progressing molecular methods applied to estimate the genetic variance of the plant because it is practically convenient and technically easy34.

The current research focused on genetic diversity and inhabitance composition in wild and cultivated accessions of sunflowers from distant three geographical locations; North America, Egypt and Tunisia. All varieties were genotyped using a genome-broad collection molecular marker derived from (SSR) and (ISSR) genomic regions. Specific objectives of this study were: (i) Estimating genetic variation within 13 sunflower genotypes employing ISSR and SSR markers (ii) Phylogenetic analysis of those genotypes based on a combination of molecular profiles and (iii) Evaluation of the genetic diversity assessed by molecular marker system to study the genetic patterns with providing data applicable to conservation and breeding uses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant materials: The study was carried out at the Biology Department, College of Science, Taif University from Jan, 2018-April, 2019). Thirteen varieties of healthful seeds of Helianthus annuus L. taken from different sources were investigated, representing different regions including wild and cultivated members. The genotypes included are shown in Table 1.

Germination: Dry mature seeds of Helianthus were soaked in distilled water at 4°C for 24 h. and transferred to Petri dish containing 11 cm diameter filter paper at a temperature of 15°C in the dark until the emergence of 2 mm primary roots.

Table 1:
List of sunflower cultivars used in this study, their origin and pedigree information
c: Cultivated, w: Wild cultivar

Symmetrical germinated seeds were chosen and taken to plastic pots containing 1 kg of sterilized soil at 2.0 cm depth and were incubated at a temperature of 23±1°C and light/dark photoperiod of 15 h light/ 8h dark. Leaf materials were harvested for further DNA analyses at the 4-6-leaf stage.

Genomic DNA extraction: DNA extraction was achieved by 40-100 mg of plant tissues. A small-scale DNA isolation technique by Wizard®. Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega) was carried out for the extraction following the manufacturer guidelines. To assess whether extracted DNA is degraded and to confirm the quantification, an aliquot of 1-2.5 μL DNA samples and 10 μL loading buffer were loaded on 1% agarose gel and visualized by UV transilluminator (Biometra UV star 15).

SSR assay: Five primers were selected for generating SSR markers in the different genotypes of Helianthus, depending on the uniformity and number of amplified fragments. SSR primers were synthesized by Macrogen Co. Ltd. (Korea) (Table 2). The protocol for SSR analysis was carried out following35. PCR reactions were performed using 5 X FIREPol Master mixes in a 25 μL volume, following manufacturer's guidelines in PXE Thermal Cycler according to the following profile: an initial step of 5 min at 94°C, 35 cycles of 45 sec at 94°C, 45 s at 53°C and 1 min at 72°C and a final step of 10 min at 72°C. 10 μL PCR products in samples were analyzed on 2% Metaphor® agarose gels in TBE buffer running at 100 V. DNA molecular size ladder (100 bp marker; RTU) was used for each agarose gel. The gels were stained by ethidium bromide and visualized using UV transilluminator (Biometra UV star 15); after which the gel was photographed and documented using the GelPro32 software. To confirm the reproducibility of all polymorphic bands, all reactions were accomplished twice.

ISSR assay: Five primers based on dinucleotide repeats were selected from 15 primers (Macrogen Co. Ltd. (Korea), for the generation of ISSR markers, based on quality, polymorphism and the reproducibility of the amplification. The ISSR marker amplification technique was carried out36 with some modifications. The reactions were performed using 5 X FIREPol Master mixes in a 25 μL volume, following the manufacturer’s instructions in PXE Thermal Cycler with the following program: 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 sec, annealing at 54 or 56°C for 30 sec and an extension at 72 °C for 1 min; a final extension was performed at 72°C for 3 min. The amplified products were separated on 1.5% (w/v) agarose gels in a 1XTBE buffer37. DNA molecular size ladder (100 bp marker; RTU) was used for each agarose gel. The gels were stained by ethidium bromide and visualized using UV transilluminator (Biometra UV star 15); after which the gel was photographed and documented using the GelPro32 software. To confirm the reproducibility of all polymorphic bands, all reactions were accomplished twice.

Data analysis: The successfully amplified primers resulted in SSR and ISSR bands that distinguished from the agarose gel were recorded as diallelic characters: present = 1, absent = 0 at each position, with missing data scored as “9”. Jaccard similarity coefficient for pairwise comparisons has been utilized to assess the genetic relations between genotypes depending on the proportion of shared bands produced by the primers. A dendrogram was produced by an unweighted pair group method for an arithmetic mean (UPGMA), which resulted from a similarity matrix when exposed to cluster analysis. The calculations were achieved using the program NTSYS-PC version 2.0138. The principal component analysis was applied to Jaccard’s similarity matrix.

RESULTS

Polymorphisms observed by SSR and ISSR markers: The studied genotypes of H. annuus revealed a high level of polymorphism (Table 2 and 3). All the SSR primers created reproducible and clear bands (Fig. 1). 26 fragments totally, ranged in size from 34-889 bp were scored in PCR profile of the tested plants, most of them show evident polymorphism. A single primer produced polymorphic bands ranged from 2 (ORS-818 and ORS-844) to 8 (ORS-718), with a mean of 4.8 of polymorphic bands per primer (Table 4). The percentage of polymorphism varied between 66.66% (ORS-818) and 100% (ORS-844, ORS-899, ORS-718) with an average of 90.83%.

ISSR primers revealed genetic variations across the 13 genotypes (Fig. 2). 57 bands produced by ISSR primers, 55 of which were polymorphic. The band's number ranged from 6 (UBC-857) to 20 (UBC-808) and the amplicon size varied from 103-1331 bp. 11 was the average number of polymorphic bands per primer (Table 4). The polymorphism percentage varied between 91.66% (ISSR-2) and 100% (ISSR-5, UBC-857, 811) with a mean of 97.37%. Both SSR and ISSR bands were listed (1) for the existence or (0) for disappearance through the genotypes and then applied for UPGMA study.

Table 2:
List of SSR primers, the number of amplified products, the number of polymorphic and monomorphic bands and percentage of polymorphism obtained by analyzing 13 cultivars of sunflower
Number of polymorphic (PB), total number of amplified products (TB), monomorphic bands (MB), percentage of polymorphism (%P)

Table 3:
List of ISSR primers, the total number of amplified products (TB), the number of polymorphic (PB) and monomorphic bands (MB) and percentage of polymorphism (%P) obtained by analyzing 13 cultivars of sunflower

Table 4:Comparison of DNA marker systems in H. annus

Table 5: Dice similarity coefficient of 13 genotypes based on SSR data analysis

Table 6: Dice similarity coefficient of 13 genotypes based on ISSR data analysis

Table 7: Dice similarity coefficient of 13 genotypes based on ISSR+SSR data analysis

Fig. 1(a-e):
SSR-PCR amplification products of 13 accessions of sunflower produced by (a) Primer ORS-818, (b) Primer ORS-844, (c) Primer ORS-899, (d) Primer ORS-613 and (e) Primer ORS-718
  Lane M is 1 kb ladder and lanes 1-13 present different sunflower accessions as listed in Table 1

Fig. 2(a-e):
ISSR-PCR amplification products of 13 accessions of sunflower produced by (a) Primers ISSR-2, (b) Primer ISSR-5, (c) Primer UBC-808, (d) Primer UBC-857 and (e) Primer 811
  Lane M is 1 kb ladder and lanes 1-13 present different sunflower accessions as listed in Table 1

Genetic similarities developed by SSR and ISSR markers: Dice similarity evidence value for the 13 accessions of H. annuus examined genetic similarity considering SSR and ISSR processes individually as well as in combination. Genetic distances exhibited by SSR markers varied from 0.1-0.79. 0.1 was the lowest value recorded between Nagachya and Autumn Beauty genotypes whereas Sakha 53 and Red Sun genotypes showed the highest distance number of 0.79 (Table 5). Based on ISSR markers, a different pattern was revealed by Dice similarity index as the greatest amount (0.77) was recorded between Sidi Nsir and Wild genotypes while the lowest value (0.0) was between (Velvet Queen and Red Sun, (Table 6). In a combined analysis of both markers, a higher index value was registered (0.85) between Arcade de-LT and Zahret Median genotypes, whereas Velvet Queen showed the lowest coefficient of 0.15 with Red Sun genotype (Table 7).

Phylogenetic analysis: The phylogenetic relations between 13 accessions of H. annuus were examined through UPGMA method. All the genotypes may be recognized by SSR and ISSR markers as indicated by the clustering pattern. However, SSR analysis showed a phylogenetic relationship among the genotypes different from that generated by the ISSR analysis.

Based on SSR, the resulting dendrogram gathered the 13 accessions into one main cluster and a solitary genotype of Red Sun established a break OUT in cluster I, exhibiting lower genetic identity (0.547) relative with the other genotypes (Fig. 3a). The master cluster II then diverged into two subclusters. The first subcluster IIa included seven genotypes (Velvet Queen, Wild, Nagachya, Autumn beauty, Rumbosol, Lemon Queen and Sakha-53), which in turn split into a group of five genotypes with Velvet Queen separated as OUT with distance coefficient of 0.241 with regard to the remaining genotypes within this group. Among the other four genotypes, Wild and Nagachya were the most closer ones as they came in a dichotomous branch with a similarity index of 0.058 whereas Autumn beauty and Rumbosol revealed a higher mean of dissimilarity value of 0.129 and 0.155 respectively. Within the same subcluster IIa, the two genotypes (Lemon Queen and Sakha-53) were gathered in one dichotomous branch with dice similarity of 0.151. The second subcluster IIb comprised five genotypes (Fall Teddy, Zrbia and Zahret Median, Sidi Nsir and Arcade de LT).

Fig. 3(a-c):
Dendrograms gaining from 13 accessions of sunflower with UPGMA based on similarity coefficient. (a) SSR data-based dendrogram; (b)ISSR data-based dendrogram; (c) combined (SSR and ISSR) data based dendrogram

The two genotypes Sidi Nsir and Arcade de LT were separated in a dichotomous branch with a genetic identity of 0.153, whereas the three remaining taxa were grouped in a dichotomous branch included Zrbia and Zahret Median genotypes and Fall Teddy separated as OUT genotype.

On the other hand, the phylogenetic relationships among the various accessions revealed by ISSR analysis have been fairly distinctive from that generated by SSR markers. A dendrogram of ISSR gathered the 13 accessions into two main clusters (Fig. 3b). Genotypes within these two master clusters I, II was then split into two subclusters (Ia, Ib and IIa, IIb). Subcluster Ia included three genotypes (Red Sun, Velvet Queen and Autumn beauty) and a single genotype (Sakha-53) formed a breakaway in cluster Ia revealing less similarity coefficient (0.340) with the three genotypes. Meanwhile, Red Sun and Velvet Queen were close to each other with a similarity index equal to 0 (Table 6). subcluster Ia also grouped Nagachya with Zrbia together in a dichotomous branch as well as Fall Teddy which created a separate OUT as exhibited by minimum identity coefficient (0.484) with the remaining 6 genotypes in the same subcluster. Subcluster Ib included only a dichotomous branch with Sidi Nsir and Rumbosol with Dice index of 0.314. On the other hand, cluster II was subdivided into two subclusters of the remaining four taxa in the form of two dichotomous branches. Subcluster IIa gathered wild with Zahret Median whereas Lemon Queen and Arcade de LT were included in subcluster IIb.

Another UPGMA cluster analysis combined the ISSR and SSR data, (Fig. 3c). The type of clustering through the genotypes in the collective test was identical to the ISSR dendrogram in grouping four genotypes in dichotomous branches (Red Sun /Velvet Queen and Wild/ Zahret Median), while the SSR dendrogram exhibited a different type of clustering in sunflower genotypes. In general, collective data in a cluster analysis of the two markers formed a dendrogram that broke the genotypes into two clusters. The first cluster (I) involved 11 taxa of sunflower whereas the remaining two genotypes (Acrade-de LT and Rumbosol) were comprised in the second cluster II in a dichotomous branch with a similarity index of 0.259. Within cluster I, Wild and Zahret Median genotypes recorded similarity coefficient of 0.269 as they were adjacent to each other and Velvet-Queen and Red Sun were also grouped in the same branch with a similarity coefficient of 0.154. The other seven genotypes were distant from those four genotypes as they separated as OUT (Fig. 3c).

DISCUSSION

In many studies, genetic and population diversity is commonly estimated using SSR and ISSR markers derived information39. Both marker systems were proved as successful tools to assess genetic variation and to resolve the relationships through phylogeny in H. annuus L.40,41. Polymorphism is a result of divergence in DNA sequences and indicates genetic diversity among individuals. In this study, the results showed high polymorphism among the genotypes of H. annuus, which reflects the presence of wide genetic variability. This elevated degree of polymorphism might be referred to as the different locations of the genotypes or/and their origin knowledge42. Previous studies reported polymorphism percentage of 91.30%40 and 54.05%33 in H. annuus. In this study, both SSR and ISSR markers were confirmed to have efficiency for estimation of genetic variation in sunflower as they exceeded up to 97% of polymorphism. SSR marker has the advantage as being a co-dominant marker that detects heterozygote from the homozygote genotypes25,40. On the other hand, the higher percent of polymorphism generated by ISSR may be due to the change in the attaching positions of the primer as a result of alterations in the microsatellite sequence43. This finding is in accordance with polymorphism percentage revealed by ISSR marker among 24 different P. lentiscus wild genotypes, in comparison to other molecular markers44,45.

Awareness of genetic distance between genotypes is beneficial in providing an additional functional sampling of genotypes and breeding applications of germplasm for the improvement of populations42,46. A connection of molecular diversity with geographical sites have been established in many previous phylogenetic studies47-50. In this study, SSR, ISSR whether individually or combined proved a variable pattern of genetic relatedness regarding the geographical distribution. Considering SSR data analysis, it can be deduced that some of sunflower populations belonging to distant geographical locations (e.g., Sakha 53 and Red Sun) revealed higher genetic variation compared to those from close allocations (e.g., Zahret Madian, Zriba).Even though the two distant accessions (Nagachya and Wild) exhibited a higher genetic similarity represented by low Dice similarity value. On the other hand, ISSR data analysis exhibited higher genetic similarity between two genotypes (Red Sun and Velvet Queen) from the same geographical region, whereas distantly distributed genotypes such as Wild and Sidi Nisr showed genetic dissimilarity as revealed by high Dice similarity value. This could be attributed to limiting gene stream by seed migration through geographical barriers. As suggested by Siragusa et al.51, effective segregation of tightly attached accessions could be verified by combined data from more than one molecular marker. In the same context, combined SSR and ISSR data confirmed the genetic relatedness of both Red Sun and Velvet Queen genotypes whereas high genetic dissimilarity was greatly represented between Sakha 53 and Acrade de LT as they were from different geographical regions. Nevertheless, these findings are inconsistent with the lower recorded genetic similarity index between the two genotypes (Zahret Median and Acrade de LT), irrespective of the geographical origin. Hence, the position of those genotypes in different zones and/or their origin history resulted in genetic diversity among the sunflower genotypes.

Furthermore, UPGMA analysis showed no obvious manner of clustering according to the geographical sites. As indicated by the Dice coefficient, cluster tests exhibited that accessions from a single geographical area collected with each other in some situations while they were positioned in dissimilar clusters in others. Phylogenetic analysis of both markers allocated sunflower cultivars as sister groups in two clusters indicating that they have the same progenitor. However, each analysis showed a variable pattern of monophyletic groups which is fortified by similarity coefficient values. SSR dendrogram exhibited four monophyletic groups whereas ISSR phylogenetic construction generated five different monophyletic groups. Combined ISSR and SSR data reduced the number of monophyletic groups to three, two of them coincided with those generated from ISSR phenogram.

Regardless of its origin genotype, genetic variability within sunflower accessions could be attributed to insertion/deletion or genetic recombination52, high allogamy quality of the sunflower plant53, crossed mating system54, diversity in selection, adaptation, migration, surroundings and human actions55, incomplete genome covering due to the small number of studied samples and markers56,57. The indicated non-considerable relation between genetic similarity and geographical distance is consistent with phylogenetic studies on other plant species, e.g., canola42, Melocanna58, castor59. Furthermore, this study detected the presence of different genetical subdivision of groups within the investigated sunflower cultivars regardless of whether they were naturally occurring (Wild and Lemon Queen) or cultivated. In disturbed habitats, likely, wild sunflower is mainly grown as a weed and so have been expanded via anthropogenic activities60-62. This diversion is probably owing to the time of development and variations in the breeding history of the cultivated species.

CONCLUSION

Based on SSR and ISSR markers, this study aimed to deduce the genetic variation of sunflower accessions gathered from different geographic areas including wild and cultivated cultivars. In comparison to SSR, ISSR markers were proved as preferable candidates for supplementary investigations on genetic diversity in H. annus because of their higher clonal polymorphism. No remarkable association between genetic diversity and geographic distribution was recorded in this study. Therefore, more extensive analysis with a higher number of molecular markers and genotypes will be required to clarify the existence of genetic variance in H. annus germplasm.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study discovers the allocation and extension of genetic diversity on 13 sunflowers (Helianthus annuus) genotypes from different regions. This study will help the researcher to uncover the critical areas of the wide genetic basis for outlook sunflower that many researchers were not able to explore. Thus, a new theory on germplasm breeding programs may be arrived at.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors would like to thank Dr. Houneida Attia, Assistant Professor, Faculty of Science of Tunis El Manar University, for her cooperation and supplying seeds from Tunisia. The authors would also like to thank the authorities of Taif University for financial support of the work. This research is a part of Project No. 1/438/5881.

REFERENCES

  • Funk, W.C., D.C. Cannatella and M.J. Ryan, 2009. Genetic divergence is more tightly related to call variation than landscape features in the Amazonian frogs Physalaemus petersi and P. freibergi. J. Evolut. Biol., 22: 1839-1853.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dempewolf, H., L.H. Rieseberg and Q.C. Cronk, 2008. Crop domestication in the compositae: a family-wide trait assessment. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 55: 1141-1157.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fernandez-Martınez, J.M., B. Perez-Vich and L. Velasco, 2010. Sunflower. In: Oil Crops Vollmann, J., and I. Rajcan, Springer-Verlag New York, pp: 155-232
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rasmussen, D.A. and M.A.F. Noor, 2009. What can you do with 0.1× genome coverage? A case study based on a genome survey of the scuttle fly Megaselia scalaris (Phoridae). BMC Genomics,
    CrossRef    


  • Lee, R.M., J, Thimmapuram, K.A. Thinglum, G. Gong and A.G. Hernandez et al., 2009. Sampling the water hemp (Amaranthus tuberculatus) genome using pyrosequencing technology. Weed sci., 57: 463-469.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rieseberg, L.H., C.R. Linder and G.J. Seiler, 1995. Chromosomal and genic barriers to intro-gression in Helianthus. Genetics, 141: 1163-1171.
    Direct Link    


  • Kane, N.C., J.M. Burke, L. Marek, G. Seiler and F. Vear et al., 2013. Sunflower genetic, genomic and ecological resources. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 13: 10-20.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mandel, J.R., J.M. Dechaine, L.F. Marek and J.M. Burke, 2011. Genetic diversity and population structure in cultivated sunflower and a comparison to its wild progenitor, Helianthus annuus L. Theor. Appl. Genet., 123: 693-704.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Putt, E.D., 1997. Early history of sunflower. In: Sunflower Production and Technology. Scheiter, A.A., Soil Science Society of America America, pp: 1-19
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Choudhury, D.R., N. Singh, A.K. Singh, S. Kumar and K. Srinivasan et al., 2014. Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure of rice germplasm from North-eastern region of India and development of a core germplasm set. PLoS ONE,
    CrossRef    


  • Liang, W., L. Dondini, P. De Franceschi, R. Paris, S. Sansavini and S. Tartarini, 2014. Genetic diversity, population structure and construction of a core collection of apple cultivars from Italian germplasm. Plant Mol. Biol. Rep., 33: 458-473.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kantar, M.B., K. Betts, J.M. Michno, J.J. Luby and P.L. Morrell et al., 2014. Evaluating an interspecific Helianthus annuus×Helianthus tuberosus population for use in a perennial sunflower breeding program. Field Crops Res., 155: 254-264.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • De Vicente, M.C., F.A. Guzman, J. Engels and V.R. Rao, 2005. Genetic characterization and its use in decision making for the conservation of crop Germplasm. The Role of Biotechnology, March 5-7, 2005, Villa Gualino, Turin, Italy.


  • Cuevas, H.E. and L.K. Prom, 2020. Evaluation of genetic diversity, agronomic traits, and anthracnose resistance in the NPGS Sudan Sorghum Core collection. BMC Genomics,
    CrossRef    


  • Zia, Z.U., H.A. Sadaqat, M.H.N. Tahir, B. Sadia and B.S. Bushman et al., 2014. Estimation of genetic diversity using SSR markers in sunflower. Russ. J. Genet., 50: 570-580.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kholghi, M., R. Darvishzadeh, I. Bernousi, A. Pirzad and H. Laurentin, 2012. Assessment of genomic diversity among and within Iranian confectionery sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) populations by using simple sequence repeat markers. Acta. Agric. Scand. Sect. B-Soil Plant Sci., 62: 488-498.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vukich, M., A.H. Schulman, T. Giordani, L. Natali, R. Kalendar and A. Cavallini, 2009. Genetic variability in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and in the Helianthus genus as assessed by retrotransposon-based molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet., 119: 1027-1038.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mondini, L., A. Noorani and M.A. Pagnotta, 2009. Assessing plant genetic diversity by molecular tools. Diversity, 1: 19-35.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Binneck, E., J.L. Nedel and O.A. Dellagostin, 2002. RAPD analysis on cultivar identification: A useful methodology? Rev. bras. sem., 24: 183-196.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Garcia, A.A.F., L.L Benchimol, A.M.M. Barbosa and I.O. Geraldi, 2004. Comparison of RAPD, RFLP, AFLP and SSR markers for diversity studies in tropical maize inbred lines. Genet. Mol. Biol., 27: 579-588.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Goncalves, L.S., R. Rodrigues, A.T. Do Amaral Junior, M. Karasawa and C.P. Sudre, 2009. Heirloom tomato gene bank: assessing genetic divergence based on morphological, agronomic and molecular data using a Ward-modified location model. Genet. Mol. Res., 8: 364-374.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Saker, M.M., S.S. Youssef, N.A. Abdallah, H.S. Bashandy and A.M. EI-Sharkawy, 2005. Genetic analysis of some Egyptian rice genotypes using RAPD, SSR and AFLP. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 4: 882-890.
    Direct Link    


  • De Souza, S.G.H., V. Carpentieri-Pípolo, C. De F. Ruas, V. De P. Carvalho, P.M. Ruas and A.C. Gerage, 2008. Comparative analysis of genetic diversity among the maize inbred lines (Zea mays L.) obtained by RAPD and SSR markers. Braz. arch. biol. technol., 51: 183-192.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mornkham, T., P.P. Wangsomnuk, X.C. Mo, F.O. Francisco, L.Z. Gao and H. Kurzweil, 2016. Development and characterization of novel EST-SSR markers and their application for genetic diversity analysis of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.). Genet. Mol. Res., Vol. 15.
    CrossRef    


  • Agrama, H.A., and M.R. Tuinstra, 2003. Phylogenetic diversity and relationships among sorghum accessions using SSRs and RAPDs. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 2: 334-340.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gupta, P., H. Balyan, K. Edwards, P. Isaac and V. Korzun et al., 2002. Genetic mapping of 66 new microsatellite (SSR) loci in bread wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet., 105: 413-422.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Halton, T.A., 2001. Plant genotyping by analysis of microsatellite. In: The DNA Fingerprinting of Plant. Henry, R.J., CABI Publication New York, USA, pp: 15-29
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Snowdon, R.J. and W. Friedt, 2004. Molecular markers in Brassica oilseed breeding: current status and future possibilities. Plant Breed., 123: 1-8.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hvarleva, T.Z., A. Bakalova, I. Chepinski, M. Hristova-Cherbadji, M. Hristov and A. Atanasov, 2014. Characterization of Bulgarian sunflower cultivars and inbred lines with microsatellite markers. Biotechnol. Equip., 21: 408-412.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zia, Z.U., H.A. Sadaqat, M.H.N. Tahir, B. Sadia and B.S. Bushman et al., 2014. Estimation of genetic diversity using SSR markers in sunflower. Russ. J. Genet., 50: 570-580.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tang, S.Q., F. Wei, L.Y. Zeng, X.K. Li, S.C. Tang, Y. Zhong and Y.P. Geng, 2009. Multiple introductions are responsible for the disjunct distributions of invasive Parthenium hysterophorusin China: evidence from nuclear and chloroplast DNA. Weed Res., 49: 373-380.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Drine, S.F., F. Guasmi, S.B. Ali, T. Triki, F. Boussorra and A. Ferchichi, 2016. Genetic diversity analysis of different barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes from arid and humid regions using ISSR and RAPD markers. J. new Sci., Agric. Biotechnol., 34: 1930-1939.
    Direct Link    


  • Messaitfa, Z.H., A.I. Shehata, F. El Quraini, H. Rizwana, A.A. Al Hazzani and M.S. El wahabi, 2014. Genotypic of salt stressed sunflower (Helianthus annuus). Int. J. Pure App. Biosci., 2: 40-61.
    Direct Link    


  • Wangsomnuk, P.P., S. Khampa, S. Jogloy, A. Patanothai and Y.B. Fu, 2011. Assessing genetic structure and relatedness of Jerusalem artichoke (Helianthus tuberosus L.) germplasm with RAPD, ISSR and SRAP markers. Am. J. Plant Sci., 2: 753-764.
    CrossRef    


  • Williams, J.G.K., A.R. Kubelik, K.J. Livak, J.A. Rafalski and S.V. Tingey, 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Res., 18: 6531-6535.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Zhao, K.G., Zhou, M.Q., Chen, L.Q. D. Zhang and G.W. Robert, 2019. Genetic Diversity and Discrimination of Chimonanthus praecox (L.) Link Germplasm Using ISSR and RAPD Markers Hort. Sci., 42: 1144-1148.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jia, X.D., T. Wang, M. Zhai, Y.R. Li and Z.R. Guo, 2011. Genetic diversity and identification of Chinese-grown pecan using ISSR and SSR markers. Molecules, 16: 10078-10092.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rohlf, F.J., 2000. NTSYS-PC: numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 2.1, Exeter Software Inc., New York, USA
    Direct Link    


  • Filippi, C.V., N. Aguirre, J.G. Rivas, J. Zubrzycki, A. Puebla et al., 2015. Population structure and genetic diversity characterization of a sunflower association mapping population using SSR and SNP markers. BMC Plant Biol.,
    CrossRef    


  • Verma, K.S., S. Ul-Haq, S. Kachhwaha and S.L. Kothari, 2017. RAPD and ISSR marker assessment of genetic diversity in Citrullus colocynthis (L.) Schrad: a unique source of germplasm highly adapted to drought and high-temperature stress. 3 Biotech.,
    CrossRef    


  • Suresha, P.G., V.V. Kulkarni, S.M. Supriya, S. Darshan and C.B. Pati., 2017. Genetic diversity analysis in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) parental lines using SSR and RAPD markers. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 6: 2069-2076.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Abdelmigid, H.M., 2012. Efficiency of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and inter-simple sequence repeats (ISSR) markers for genotype fingerprinting and genetic diversity studies in canola (Brassica napus). Afr. J. Biotechnol., 11: 6409-6419.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Freudenreich, C.H., J.B. Stavenhagen and V.A. Zakian, 1997. Stability of a CTG/CAG trinucleotide repeat in yeast is dependent on its orientation in the genome. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17: 2090-2098.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Abuduli, A., Y. Aydin, M. Sakiroglu, A. Onay, S. Ercisli and A.A. Uncuoglu, 2016. Molecular evaluation of genetic diversity in wild-type mastic tree (Pistacia lentiscus L.). Biochem. Genet., 54: 619-635.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Turhan-Serttaş, P. and T. Özcan, 2018. Intraspecific variations studied by ISSR and IRAP markers in mastic tree (Pistacia lentiscus L.) from Turkey. Trakya. Univ. J. Nat. Sci., 19: 147-157.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Govindaraj, M., M. Vetriventhan and M. Srinivasan, 2015. Importance of genetic diversity assessment in crop plants and its recent advances: An overview of its analytical perspectives. Genet. Res. Int., Vol. 2015.
    CrossRef    


  • Ismail, N.O., M.Y. Rafii, T.M.M. Mahmud, M.M. Hanafi and G. Miah, 2019. Genetic diversity of torch ginger (Etlingera elatior) germplasm revealed by ISSR and SSR markers. BioMed. Res. Int.,
    CrossRef    


  • Hu, P., Y. Shao, J. Xu, T. Wang, Y. Li et al., 2019. Genome-wide study on genetic diversity and phylogeny of five species in the genus Cervus. BMC Genomics,
    CrossRef    


  • Kizhakkayil, J. and B. Sasikumar, 2010. Genetic diversity analysis of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). germplasm based on RAPD and ISSR markers. Scientia Horticult., 125: 73-76.
    CrossRef    


  • Das, A., M. Gaur, D.P. Barik and E. Subudhi, 2016. Genetic diversity analysis of 60 ginger germplasm core accessions using ISSR and SSR markers. Plant Biosyst., 151: 822-832.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Siragusa, M., F. De Pasquale, L. Abbate and N. Tusa, 2006. Identification of sour orange accessions and evaluation of their genetic variability by molecular marker analyses. Hortic. Sci., 41: 84-89.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sheidai, M., Z. Noormohammadi, F. Shojaei-Jeshvaghani, S. Ghsemzadeh-Baraki, F. Farahani and O. Alishah, 2012. Simple sequence repeat (SSR) and inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) analyses of genetic diversity in tissue culture regenerated plants of cotton. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 11: 11894-11900.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Jannatdoust, M., R. Darvishzadeh, R. Ziaeifard, M.A. Ebrahimi, H.H. Maleki, E. Gholinezhad and A.A. Hatamnia 2016. Analysis of genetic diversity and population structure of confectionery sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) native to Iran. J. Crop Sci. Biotechnol., 19: 37-44.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Nooryazdan, H., H. Serieys, J. David, R. Bacilieri and A.J. Berville, 2011. Construction of a crop—wild hybrid population for broadening genetic diversity in cultivated sunflower and first evaluation of its combining ability: the concept of neodomestication. Euphytica, 178: 159-175.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Solouki, M., H. Mehdikhani, H. Zeinali and A.A. Emamjomeh, 2008. Study of genetic diversity in chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla) based on morphological traits and molecular markers. Sci. Hortic., 117: 281-287.
    CrossRef    


  • Dimitrijevic, A., R. Horn, 2018. Sunflower hybrid breeding: from markers to genomic selection. Front. Plant Sci.,
    CrossRef    


  • Zeinalzadeh-Tabrizi, H., K. Haliloglu, M. Ghaffari and A. Hosseinpour, 2018. Assessment of genetic diversity among sunflower genotypes using microsatellite markers. Mol. Biol. Res. Com., 7: 143-152.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lalhruaitluanga, H. and M.N.V. Prasad, 2009. Comparative results of RAPD and ISSR markers for genetic diversity assessment in Melocanna baccifera Roxb. growing in Mizoram State of India. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 8: 6053-6062.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gajera, B.B., N. Kumar, A.S. Singh, B.S. Punvar, R. Ravikiran, N. Subhash and G.C. Jadeja, 2010. Assessment of genetic diversity in castor (Ricinus communis L.) using RAPD and ISSR markers. Ind. Crops Prod., 32: 491-498.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Smith, B.D., 2014. The domestication of Helianthus annuus L. (sunflower). Veget Hist Archaeobot., 23: 57-74.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fehr, W.R., 1987. Principles of Cultivar Development. Vol. 1, Macmillan Publishing Co., New York
    Direct Link    


  • Fick, G.N. and J.F. Miller, 1997. Sunflower Breeding. In: Sunflower Technology and Production, Schneiter, A.A. (Ed.). ASA, CSSA, SSSA Inc., Wisconsin, USA., pp: 395-439
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved