HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2019 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 4 | Page No.: 154-167
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2019.154.167
Endophyte: Understanding the Microbes and its Applications
Raymond Oriebe Anyasi and Harrison Ifeanyichukwu Atagana

Abstract: The ability of endophytes to colonize every plant tissue has led to the opportunity of using the microorganism in a lot of biological applications. Endophytes are beneficial to their host cells as such its application is observed in every aspects of life. This study therefore endeavored to give an analysis of endophytes, what they were and what they had been used for till the present time. Sampling of several literature studies in endophytes was done in this study to enable a complete understanding of the mechanism of application of the actions of endophytes, so as to be able to do a thorough assessment of the current state in the knowledge of the microbes. From the complete analysis of the literature on the application and use of endophytes, in nutrient asquition and increase the stress tolerance in plants. This study provided a platform for further research gaps through the presentation of what endophytes were, what they had been used for till date, the mechanism of operation of the micro-organism and the type of interaction between them and their hosts. There are still ways to improve on the methods of application of endophytes as a type of biological organism. This will be done by adjusting to the current trends in biological studies using molecular mechanization, following an intensive further study on endophyte mechanisms.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Raymond Oriebe Anyasi and Harrison Ifeanyichukwu Atagana, 2019. Endophyte: Understanding the Microbes and its Applications. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 22: 154-167.

Keywords: phytoremediation, Endophytes mechanism, host cells, pollutants and plant-microbes interactions

INTRODUCTION

It has been reported that all plants in their natural ecosystems appear to be symbiotic with endophytes1. This highly diverse group of microbes usually impact greatly on plant communities through the increasing of fitness. This increase of fitness in plants is achieved through the conferring of abiotic and biotic stress tolerance, increasing biomass, decreasing water consumption and/or decreasing of fitness by altering the allocation of resources from soil to the plants2. Although prolong research studies has ensued in this new line of biotechnology resulting in lots of studies, the ecological significance of these set of microorganisms and their interactions with plants have not been unraveled.

Endophytes are regarded as a micro-organism that lives in plant tissues partly or in all of their lifecycle. They could be classified as beneficial, neutral and or detrimental depending on the kind of interaction with their host plant1. Endophytes may not have been very much recognized however, all the well-known studied organisms could be regarded as endophytes. For example, mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia are regarded as the beneficial ones, while Fusarium sp. that causes wilt disease in a banana are taken as the detrimental ones3. Nonetheless, endophytes are not directly detrimental to plants1. In the recent past, many studies have been focusing on the exposition of the modes of action of mutualistic endophytes. This has been clearly indicated by the reports of these studies, stating the ability of endophytes to activate their host plant’s existing defense mechanisms before or after pest and pathogens are supplied into the system1,2,4.

Right from the introduction of symbiosis as ‘the living together of dissimilar organisms5, an array of symbiotic lifestyles have been defined based on fitness benefits or impacts to macroscopic hosts and microscopic symbionts6. Collectively, literature has reported that most, if not all, plants in their natural ecosystems are symbiotic with microbial endophytes1,7-8. These microbial symbionts can have profound effects on plant ecology, fitness and evolution8, shaping plant communities9 and manifesting strong effects on the biological activities of the plants3. According to the fossil record, plants have been associated with bacterial endophytes and mycorrhizal fungi for >400 million years. This relationship starts the moment a land is colonized by plants, thus playing a long and important role in driving the evolution of life on land2,10,11.Unlike mycorrhizal fungi that colonize plant roots and grow into the rhizosphere, endophytes reside entirely within plant tissues and may grow within roots, stems and/or leaves, emerging to sporulate at plant or host-tissue senescence12-16. These bio-activities were made known by the mechanisms that resulted in the evolution of the concept of endophytism and its genetic basis, although much understanding has not been garnered13.

Endophytes in its colonization ability, behave the same way as phytopathogens, as a result they can serve as a biocontrol agent15. According to literature, endophytes possess the ability to control the pathogens of plant, insects and nematodes15,16. Some of the organisms helps to in enhancing seedling emergence, promote plant establishment in adverse conditions and also enhance plant growth3,15,17-18. Other classes of endophytes have been shown to be involved in the synthesis of novel compounds and antifungal metabolites15. This biodiversity of strains of endophytes used for novel metabolites may assist in the identification of new drugs that could help in the effective treatment of diseases for humans, plants and animals1,17,18. In addition to the production of novel chemicals, some other endophytes are implicated in their natural capacity for xenobiotic degradation, which may also act as vectors that introduce traits for degradation purposes19. This overall importance of endophytes results from their exposure to diverse compounds in their interaction in plant-soil niche. At the moment, many investigations are underway as a way of improving the biocontrol capabilities of endophytes15,20-23. This review aimed to provide an understanding of endophytes and the current state of its application as a novel micro-organism.

EXPLANATION OF THE CONCEPT

Since early 1866, there have been a lot of controversies surrounding the concept of endophyte and what could be taking as its definition, based on the notion put forward by De Barry5. However, Petrini8 concluded that endophyte should be referred to as those micro-organisms that live in the plant organelles without causing diseases and this was widespread accepted. Furthermore, other schools of thought in trying to put meaning into the understanding of what an endophyte is described the phenomenon as when an organism colonized the internal tissue of a plant during its life-cycle formutualistic, commensalistic or sometimes parasitic relationship to the host24. In another word, endophyte: A concept of ecology is one natural part of plant-micro ecology system which can thoroughly be explained by the understanding of the ecological parameters. Endophytes exist in all plant, hence, are described to be extensive in nature25,26. However, literature reports estimated the existence of endophytes in microtubule of plant cells as well as in the intercellular spaces to several millionth species27. Various studies have reported on different methods that endophytes could be isolated from different plant species as such the organisms are found distributed in several plant cells; roots, stems, leaves, fruits and seeds7,24,28. The root of the plant is still the area with the highest density, which could get to as much as 106 colony forming units per gram (CFU g1)28.

Clearly, the type, numbers as well as the rate of growth of endophyte in plant is determined by the climatic and health condition of the plant7. Although a lot of techniques exist with which endophytes could be identified, the source of endophytes is still under debate as a result of the diversity of host’s environmental conditions and the complexity of the relationship between them29. This helps to form the two hypotheses that are in existence at the moment: endogenous and exogenous system. While endogenous believes that endophytes evolve from the internal tissues: The mitochondrion and chloroplast of the plant cells, the reason being that they share similar genetic characters with the host. Exogenous system, however, is of the opinion that endophytes emanates from outside and enters the host through its surfaces30-33. With the help of biomarkers; key tools used to studying ecological processes, external colonization of plants by endophytes has been established15,34,35.

ISOLATED MICROBIAL ENDOPHYTES

Based on the organism’s classification protocols, endophytes are classified into bacterial, fungi and actinomyces or algae31. Following literature report, the first endophytic fungi (Taxomyces andreanae) were first isolated by a research study in 19931 using Taxus brevifolia: A medicinal plant27,29. The study of Huang et al.36 reported also on endophytic fungi strains totaling 42, isolated from Nerium oleander L. endophytic fungi abounds in every ecosystem, but they seem to be most abundant in tropical hosts because of their high biodiversity33-37. A number of algae grow as endophytes in seaweed; one of such is Ulvella leptochaete. This was recently discovered by a range of seaweed hosts from India (Fig. 1). The ecological advantage of these algae to the host plant is that they serve in disease resistance38. Literature report indicated that this endophyte secretes anticancer metabolites known as Taxa; used in many cancer treatments2. Bacterial endophytes are another class of endophytes with abroad range of taxa, which include α, β and γ-proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Actinobacteria etc. These classes of endophytes are reported to be intracellular in roots and shoot cells of a variety of plants and are found to gain entrance through the cells of the meristem31,35,36. A list of some of the endophytes that have been isolated from different plants and used in different studies highlighted in Table 1.

Fig. 1: Micrograph image of green microalgae (Ulvella leptochaete)38

Table 1: List of endophytes isolated from different plants tissues65
NM: Not mentioned, *Fungi, **Algae

According to literature reports, over 129 different endophytic bacteria have been isolated from a list of selected crop plants37-39. The species implicated included both the Gram-positives as well as the Gram-negatives, cutting across about 55 genera. The bacterial taxa isolated were reported to fall mostly into the Pseudomonas as well as the Enterobacteriaceae group29,34. Li et al.39 reported on the isolation of about 98 non-symbiotic endophytic bacterial strains from a study involving 150 root nodules of soybean. Furthermore, colonization of endophytic bacteria was also reported in the literature to be found in naturally grown plants but in stressed conditions. This was exemplified in the isolation of several bacterial endophytes of various species found to be resistant to extreme pH conditions in the study of Kan and his group36,37.

Hitherto, Streptomyces known to colonize both the under-ground and the above-ground tissues of the plant with a greater incident at the underground have been reported as the most isolated actinomyces37-42. Medicinal plants are important sources of this endophytic actinomyces as such plant is known to induce secondary metabolites29,43, an important factor for biological activity in the drug-resistant activity according to the study of Castillo et al.42. Although the use of endophytes in pollution control and management has been demonstrated for a long time now15, there seem to be relatively less research in its exploitation unlike in the medical science application39,40. The reason behind this is the inability to understand the mechanism of action of the endophytes in the environmental medium. This can only be unraveled through further practical applications19.

DISTRIBUTION OF ENDOPHYTES IN PLANTS

Within the plants, endophytes are usually found in the intercellular space as well as in the vascular tissues. Most studies carried out on some selected food reported on this15,17,41. The ability of plants components to express its living condition is the factor that determines the colonization of endophytes42. This compartmentalization was made known by the study of Castillo et al.42and Bezerra et al.43, when they failed to obtain the same isolates in adjacent plant compartment, even in the same soil counterpart. The study discovered that only Pseudomonas sp. was found in all the compartments of the plants, while Bacillus and Arthrobacter were found only in the roots and stems. Therefore, Pseudomonas was reported as the most abundant genus that was recovered from the plant's rhizosphere. This was as a result of the rhizode position of organic acids and aromatics like phenols44. The reported abundance of Pseudomonas sp. could be as result of its ability to degrade organic compounds used as a source of energy. The predominance of Pseudomonas sp. is evident in Table 1.

There are other studies that reported less compartmentalized isolates. For example, the study to find the incidences of microbes in a hybrid aspen plant, Burkholderia, Methylobacterium and other unidentified bacteria were cultured from every part of the plant41. Arthrobacter, Pseudomonas and another Microbacteriaceae were found in the root and leaf, while Microbacteriaceae, Sphingomonas, Aerolata and Sphingomonas auranica which are airborne related bacteria were isolated from the stem and leaves45. The greater number of Sphingomonas in the above-ground portion of the plant in this study explains the condition of life of the organism in that environment, establishing it’s ability to withstand ultraviolet radiation43. These plant microbes that are often pigmented to enhance their condition on leaf surfaces have been reported by other schools of thought44-46. The discrepancies in compartmentalization of isolated endophytes in plants may have resulted from factors which perhaps might include the growth media used as well as the differences in plants physiology. This should, however, attract further studies to truly ascertain it causes19.

There have been conflicts of reports on the frequency of colonization of endophytic fungi in trees. While most studies indicated the highest colonization in the stem, others reported on the leaves39. However, it was the study of Petrini8 that diffused the confusion with the inference that different plant tissues and organs could represent distinct microhabitat. Therefore, depending on the host-plant age, associated vegetation, elevation of the vegetation and exposure to the environment, the general frequency of colonization of endophytes could be determined47. This means to say that the existence of endophytes is influenced by seasonal, environmental as well as host tissue’s variations.

ISOLATION AND COLONIZATION

Methods of isolation of bacterial endophytes are constantly being reviewed16. The use of sodium hypochlorite in the disinfection of plant surfaces has been a common practice. But most of the residual sodium hypochlorite often affects the growth and induces mutagenesis as well as the death of the micro-organisms, thereby necessitating rinsing with a separate sodium thiosulphate to remove all the residual hypochlorite48-51.

From literature, a dilution-plate method of isolation seems to be the most widely used method owing to its less complication in operation. This method entails a stepwise process which must be followed thoroughly. The protocols to be followed include collection and washing of samples, followed by surface-sterilization with disinfectant and finally the incubation in a petri dish with growth medium52. If the sterilization time goes for too long, the plant cell would be broken so that no endophytes will be isolated26. List of compounds mostly used as a disinfectant for surface-sterilization includes HgCl2, ethanol, H2O2, NaOCl and DMSO. It is usually important to confirm the success of surface-sterilization by inoculating the last rinse of distilled water after sterilization in a Petri dish containing a medium53. The plant cell is considered clean when no bacterial colony is found on the Petri dish after inoculation. The grounding of a little quantity of the plant cell with sterile water is required before proper inoculation is done. Depending on the type of endophytic microbe in question, it most often requires the addition of fungicides to prevent extraneous organisms like fungi from covering the colony53,54. Endophyte isolated from one plant could equally be inserted successfully into the tissues of other plants. A successful demonstration of such was reported by Lopez-Fernandez et al.55 and Liu et al.56 in their study using bacteria endophytes. Also using endophytic fungic Acremonium of F. arundinacea/L. perenne and M. acuminata to confer resistance to plants demonstrated the phenomenon53. With the use of confocal electron microscope, an Excalibur plant-Streptomyces sp., observed could indicate the presence of green fluorescent protein infected in the seed of the plant. This is an evidence of pure colonization of endophytes56. The use of biomarker system of Auto fluorescent protein (AFB) known as green fluorescent protein (GFP) is currently being used to establish colonization of endophytes15.

PLANT-ENDOPHYTE RELATIONSHIP

In spite the fact that pollutants mostly organics are toxic to plants as well as micro-organisms, several plants that are found growing in the polluted soil tend to host a lot of bacteria that shows ability in the degradation of such pollutant57,58. Endophytes, however, are known to exhibit their symbiotic responsibilities to its host in most of the occasion, this they do by the various physiological interactions between them and the plants viz: Plant supplies nutrients to endophyte, while the microbes, in turn, release active metabolites as a result of their activities15,30. The released active metabolites help the plants in its root development having greater access to nutrients35. It also helps to protect the plant from desiccation and from insects as well as parasitic fungi47. This symbiotic activity enables endophyte to promote host plant growth and the supply of resistance mechanisms as explained in Fig. 2. Wide spread phenomenon has been reported to exist on the symbiosis of endophytes and plants.

Fig. 2: Schematic diagram of the different plant–bacterial endophyte interactions that16

But the report indicated that the relationship switches from mutualistic to parasitic1. Nonetheless, an alteration of any particular gene has the ability to change the entire endophytic mechanism. This was demonstrated by E. festucae: A wild-type fungus found to grow in the intercellular spaces, which was reported not only to be responsible for the promotion of plant growth but also enhanced the resistance of plant in a contaminated environment48. This study demonstrated the loss of apical dominance that eventually leads to the death of the plant the moment a plasmid of an enzyme was inserted into the coding region of the endophyte48. This, therefore, means that infection of same endophytes into different hosts results in diverse activities. The study of Xu et al. 53 described this phenomenon by reporting that Colletotrichum magna could cause a certain disease of the plant when inoculated to cucurbit plants, but when in non-cucurbit species it grows asymptomatically54. The endophytes-plant relationship could either be in parasitism or mutualism. Symbiosis (mutualism), leads to the distinctions of their effects into bio-control, growth promotion and in bioremediation.

BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF ENDOPHYTES

According to literature reports, fungi were the first endophytic organisms to be isolated. Hence the notion that fungi are the most developed of the endophytes1,8,31. These organisms have found its application in plants growth promotion and protection. Although endophytes are known to be taxonomically diverse, their fungal classifications are broadly based on ecological categories or functional classes2.

Pests and diseases have been the factors threatening the development of agriculture because of the immense loss it has inflicted on agricultural practices and its products. The development of chemical pesticides was adjudged to be the solution to the menace of pests and pathogens, it has however added in worsening the health of man and the environment17. The effect of pesticides on the emboldening soil and water has tremendously impacted the ecological status of the environment54. Certain bacterial endophytes have the ability to lessen harmful effects of some of these pests and its diseases15,58. For example, entomopathogenic micro-organisms had been reported as an alternative means of controlling the effects of pests as to enable the control and reduction of the use of chemicals in agriculture18,51. According to the study undertaken by Elmi et al.59, they were a reduction in the number of root-knot entomopathogenic microbes (nematodes) found in tall fescue after infection with fungal endophytes for 35 days, without affecting the root dry weight. Other studies have also reported on the effects of plant colonized endophytic bacterial in preventing the infection of diseases4,6. This means that colonization of entomopathogenic microbes in plants following inoculation enhances plants microbial diseaseresistance59. Some other endophytic bacterial are implicated in the prevention of the effects of the pathogen in plants26. The various applications of endophyte are explained in a nutshell in Fig. 2.

Although different symbiotic lifestyles occur among endophytes, depending on the species involved, however, the two possible modes of action of endophytes as was reported are the parasitic and/or mutualistic relationships between the hosts. It is from these two possible modes of actions that other modes draw its string from. This is explained in Fig. 3 and it flows from there. For this reason, the interaction between endophytes and plants has been described as acontinuum51.

In parasitism, Fusarium oxysporum, for example, is being reported to parasitize the egg of the banana weevil in the laboratory. This has been the mode of parasitic endophytes in attacking the pest or the causal agent of diseases. In competition, there are two things that particularly drive the endophytes49, Competition for nutrients and that of the infection sites. Pseudomonas sp., for example, produces siderophores that chelate iron, thus depriving pathogens of this essential nutrient. This means that the organism will be competing for iron nutrient centers in the body of its host37. The production of secondary metabolites is undoubtedly the major mode of action amongst endophytes35. So many secondary metabolites have been identified in endophytes.

Fig. 3: Schematic representation of endophyte-plant interaction and mode of action

Isolated endophytes of F. oxysporum from tomatoes were found to cause juvenile mortality among nematodes by reducing the rate of hatching. Colletotrichumsp., Pseudomonas sp. and actinobacteria are good candidates for the production of lists of antibacterial, antifungal and antiviral metabolites49. Induced resistance is a phenomenon whereby the defense mechanism of plants is activated when it comes in contact with either biotic or abiotic elicitors. This actions usually result in reduced pest or pathogen damage48,51,60. Before the inception of the molecular methods for the identification of fungi in endophyte research, the real number of endophytic species in a sample has always been underestimated. The reason is that in this technique, obligate endophytes: Mostly fungi not growing well in the selected medium is usually not isolated51,56. But with the introduction of rDNA sequencing, the number of fungal species identified per host plant species increased substantially61. This is because an important proportion of fungal isolates may be sterile in laboratory cultures. Genotypic identification methods have helped in the identification and distinction of sterile cultures12. Therefore, the introduction of modern biotechnological techniques has really aided the study of endophytes and its biocontrol activities.

PROMOTION OF GROWTH BY ENDOPHYTES

The ability of endophytes for plant growth promotion differs from that of the strains for biocontrol because they do not counteract the activities of pathogens rather they necessitate the increase in growth from the cycling of nutrients15. Biological activities of endophytes have been reported to enhance the synthesis of phytohormones that plays a part in root elongation and growth promotion in plants62-64. Various metabolites have been implicated in these systemic activities of endophytes and they include indole acetic acid, gibberellin, indole acetonitrile, cytokinine and all these are involved in plant growth promotion. There are other beneficial effects of endophytes on the growth of plants; they include adjustment of osmotic balance, regulation of stomata, root morphology modification, mineral uptake enhancement and alteration of metabolism15. Literature has it that certain specific hormones were extracted from an endophytic fungus of medicinal plants30 and when those hormones were incorporated into an orchid pant it enhanced growth improvement of the plant. Endophytes have also been tested in their seed germination enhancing abilities and positive inferences have been derived with a report of reduction in disease symptoms that would have resulted from such practices57. The plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes and its effect are currently been used in forest regeneration and phytoremediation activities23. Endophytes are known to improve plant’s adaptations as well as growth using their means of growth-promoting activities19. This they do through a series of mechanisms: Through phosphate solubilisation by so doing improving resistance to environmental stress of the host; through enhancement of growth hormone production; promotion of siderophore production; increased synthesis of biological compounds in plants for example vitamins; aiding of osmotic regulation; stomatal adjustment; promotion of uptake of minerals; helps in the alteration of nitrogen accumulation as well as plant metabolism of compounds15.

BIOREMEDIATION

There is strong adaptation exhibited by plants growing in an extreme environment. This phenomenon results in a specialized physiological mechanism, much of which is related to the strengthening of defense mechanisms of plants by expressing genes responsible for that23. Hence, it is easy to find unique growth-promoting hormones from the strains of the endophytes with great potentials19,25. For this reason, the approach can be employed in the remediation of polluted environment especially when such a plant is colonized by an endophyte isolated from plants growing in a polluted environment. A demonstration of this principle was made when pyrene-degrading endophyte of an Enterobacter strain was isolated from a plant growing in soil contaminated by petroleum aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH), which on analysis was able to synthesize various metabolites with greater pyrene removal ability than the control experiment without the endophytes65. Furthermore, Germain et al.24 studied the degradation of herbicides with bacterial endophytes (Pseudomonas sp. ), this study reported that there was no sign of accumulation of the herbicide in the plant tissue and no sign of phytotoxicity, unlike the uninoculated plant. Although some few studies have been able to report on the potential of some fungi associated with grass to be effective in soil remediation xenobiotics63, however, such approach has really not been demonstrated in the field59. Therefore, there is a need for interests in the creation of awareness on endophytic fungi been found in plants from the environment so that it could be employed in the field on this subject64,65. The importance of endophytic bioremediation ranges from the ability of the strain to reach larger population size because of reduced competition to their ability to degrade any absorbed xenobiotics in plant a in such a way as to reduce phytotoxic effects15. There are two different types of bioremediation (in situ and ex-situ bioremediation), this is understood based on whether the treatment is done on-site or out of site66. In situ bioremediation which is recognized as the on-site remediation are also divided into different types based on the processes involved. Phytoremediation is a typical example of in situ bioremediation which uses plants to decontaminate soil, water and the environment using energy from sunlight23. For some time now, there have been shifts in endophytic applications focusing on the exploitation of the use of endophytes in curbing the constraints of phytoremediation21. Endophytic bioaugmentation has proven to offer a lot of benefits over traditional bioaugmentation where bacteria in the former case experience less competition from the surrounding microbes and the plants in return provides the nutrient required to support growth and establishment23.

PHYTOREMEDIATION

Phytoremediation has been shown to be the most efficient and environmentally friendly means to restore original soil conditions when contaminated by various environmental contaminants62,67. The technology is generally accepted as the proven technology for the removal of environmental contaminants due to its minimal energy requirement and the beauty of the technique22,68. However, heavy metals, POPs and high molecular weight pesticides with their recalcitrant, bioaccumulation and bioconcentration properties, generally defy conventional remediation practices and techniques69,70. The limitation of phytoremediation is often as a result of the toxicity of these chemicals or their toxic end products in plants65,66. This can, however, be ameliorated through endophyte-assisted phytoremediation either by means of natural colonization or by genetic manipulation of the plant as this has recently drawn attention22,71. Various studies have reported that plants sometimes take several years to reach its maturity and the toxicity of most of the heavy chemicals allows limited activity during plants dormant phases. As a result modification of plants using plant-associated bacteria for a more potent environmental clean-up could become a remedy for such shortcoming72-74. Therefore, removal of toxic compounds from the soil can be enhanced by the use of endophyte-assisted phytoremediation; this is because endophytes assist their host plants through various means as elucidated in current application65. Since all plant species is reported to have at least one endophytic species means that its accessibility is varied7. Phytoremediation has been reported to amongst other advantages to having the ability to be used in combination with other techniques (phytostabilization, phytovolatilization, rhizofiltration etc.), therefore, the use of endophytes capable of degrading environmental contaminants in addition to the specific plants could offer an efficient, economic and sustainable remediation technology75-78. Literature also reported the ability for genetic transformation of the endophytic microbes (Transgenic preparation) for enhanced remediation activity7,79. This could be done by incorporating into plant endophyte those natural microbes ability to conjugate with each other by means of movable DNA elements (vectors) between microbial populations23. For example, by introducing bacterial genes pTOM-Bu61 involved in the metabolism of toluene and TCE, the tolerance and uptake of such compounds known to be phytotoxic to conventional phytoremediation were improved22.

FURTHER USES OF ENDOPHYTES

Endophytes are implicated in some other application for example as decomposition agents of the aging plant of salt marshes. Some other endophytes have demonstrated their ability to enhance osmoregulation in plant tissues, a boost to such plant’s resistance to extreme condition, for example, drought59. Most of these endophytic strains have been employed commercially in turf grasses to aid their effects in resisting both biotic and abiotic conditions. Some endophytes in their way of plant growth promotion indirectly compete with pathogens and reduce their activity in the process57. In genetic studies, endophytes serve as a molecular tool used as a pool for gene carrier78,79, for this reason, it is possible to genetically engineer endophytes which serve as protection for the host. The first successful demonstration of exogenous gene expression was demonstrated by Fahey74,80. In the past 2 decades, greater attention has been focused on the use of endophytes in the phytoremediation of various environmental contaminants. In the soil, bacteria gene Burkholderia cepacia L. S. 2. About 4 genetically modified by the introduction of a Ptom toluene degradation plasmid of B. cepacia G4, a natural endophyte of yellow lupine were used for phytoremediation of toluener19,20. This resulted in the inducement of strong degradation of toluene by the recombinant strain. Germaine et al.24 also described inoculation of pea plant (Pisumsativum) with genetically modified bacterial endophytes that naturally possessed the ability to degrade 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. According to the results, there was higher degradation capacity of the compound from the soil by plants inoculated with Pseudomonas putida21. In another subsequent study, there was an improvement of toxic metal phytoremediation from the environment using engineered endophytes to ensure better clean-up of the environment19. Such study has indicated the potential of microbe-plant relationship in the remediation of polluted sites and could be useful in the development of efficient environmental contaminant removal systems. Hence, these interactions between plants and micro-organisms require further understanding for recognition in order to be employed in the field.

Research interests involving the resistance of host by endophytes are lacking and the reasons behind it may not be far-fetched. One of the reasons could be drawn from the complex relationship between endophytes and hosts; while the other has to do with the fact that it is virtually difficult to understand the mechanisms of life and conditions of endophytes to be able to duplicate it. But according to Xu et al.53, one could be able to build on such understanding using the points below:

Considering the plant promotion as well as the pathogen/insect resistant ability of the endophytes might have a link with the toxicant which they synthesis in the process. These toxicants mostly inhibit the activities of such pathogens81,82. Therefore, endophytes growth promotion and pathogen resistant ability is relative to the toxicant it produces
Also, the secondary metabolites produced by endophytes could also be responsible for its resistant ability to various unfavorable conditions which enhance the competitiveness of their host; this has been supported by literature83,84. However, the demonstration of this claim by literature has not doused the controversies that are growing on this subject. While literature has shown the direct relationship between pathogens and the mechanism of endophytes, others researchers still maintain that it is an indirect relationship to the systems of insects. For instance, the inhibition of insect gall provides the hosts of endophytes resistance to the effect of such insect16. The above phenomenon has generated many discussions in the recent past regarding the effect of endophytes in harnessing disease control in insects75,81,84. The study of Zabalgogeazcoa86 highlighted on the mechanisms of operation of the endophytes and their interactions with plant pathogen. The study indicated that some of the endophytes are specialists in their infections while others are generalist85,86. However, in resistance induction to disease facilitation, Adame-Alvarez et al.87 reported that the order of arrival of endophytes in plants tissues affects endophytes-pathogen interactions which could lead to facilitation (positive inducement of disease pathogen), negatively enhance resistance by the host or causing no effect83,88. These require further studies for more confirmation

FUTURE PROSPECTS

The importance of endophytes in managing the natural environment as well as its exploitation cannot be overemphasized (Fig. 4). However, they have been limitations to the complete understanding of these taxa.

Fig. 4: Current interest in the study of endophytic biology80

Such limitation includes the fact that the method of isolation of endophyte relies on culture-dependent, while many micro-organisms are there which can not be cultured15. This, therefore, presents nonculture-dependent technology as the limiting factor for the study of endophytes. Exploitation of plant-endophyte interaction can also play a key role in promoting sustainable agriculture16. There is this claim that the amount of secondary metabolites synthesized by endophytes is insignificant to the host, which disproof’s the antagonistic effect between endophytes and pathogens. To douse or accept this claim requires many evidential studies. Therefore, in order for an improvement in the applicability of endophyte-assisted-biological applications most especially in the field, intensive future studies are required to demonstrate a better understanding of the organism in its host. Therefore, the endophytes mechanism is an important topic for future research.

CONCLUSION

The limitation to the complete understanding of the interaction of endophytes and their host with regards to their application in biological activities was inferred to depend on the continued trust in the use of generic method in their processing. Most organisms cannot be identified using those generic methods as they tend to forgo them due to transformations. Therefore, by employing sophisticated molecular methods in their processing will bring about such better understanding and will support the practice of endophytic application in the field. With this, the application of endophytes in agriculture/food processing, medicine and environmental management will be improved on, while new applications are also developed.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study was able to discover that in as much as endophyte has been applied in the following biological means: they help in nutrient acquisition through fixing of nitrogen in the root nodules, they aid growth and development using such mechanisms such as phytohormone production, they help to increase stress tolerance in plants, increase the ability of plants for disease resistance, assists in the degradation of various contaminants, production of important bioactive metabolites, assists in the translocation of and accumulation of metals in plants and helps in the production of enzymes that are likely involved in contaminant degradation. There are gaps in understanding the interaction between the organisms and its host so as to engage them in optimum application.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors wish to acknowledge the financial contribution by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa (Grant 102066).

REFERENCES

  • Strobel, G. and B. Daisy, 2003. Bioprospecting for microbial endophytes and their natural products. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 67: 491-502.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rodriguez, R.J., J.F. White Jr., A.E. Arnold and R.S. Redman, 2009. Fungal endophytes: Diversity and functional roles. New Phytol., 182: 314-330.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Felde, A.Z., 2011. Endophytes: Novel weapons in the IPM arsenal. CGIAR SP-IPM Technical Innovation Briefs No. 9, January 2011.


  • Sikora, R.A., A. Zum Felde, A. Mendoza, R. Menjivar and L. Pocasangre, 2008. In planta suppressiveness to nematodes and long term root health stability through biological enhancement-do we need a cocktail? Acta Hortic., 879: 553-560.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • De Bary, A., 1866. Morphologie und Physiologie der Pilze, Frechten und Myxomyceten. Vol. 2, W. Engelmann, Leipzig, Germany


  • Hirose, E. and A. Murakami, 2011. Microscopic anatomy and pigment characterization of coral-encrusting black sponge with cyanobacterial symbiont, Terpios hoshinota. Zool. Sci., 28: 199-205.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Anyasi, R.O. and H.I. Atagana, 2016. Endophytes: An indicator for improved phytoremediation of industrial waste. Proceedings of the 23rd WasteCon Conference, Emperors Palace, Johannesburg, South Africa, October 17-21, 2016, Institute of Waste Management of Southern Africa, pp: 140-150.


  • Petrini, O., 1991. Fungal Endophytes of Tree Leaves. In: Microbial Ecology of Leaves, Andrews, J.H. and S.S. Hirano (Eds.), Springer, New York, ISBN: 978-1-4612-3168-4, pp: 179-197
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hardoim, P.R., L.S. van Overbeek, G. Berg, A.M. Pirttila and S. Compant et al., 2015. The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 79: 293-320.
    Direct Link    


  • Kozyrovska, N.O., 2013. Crosstalk between endophytes and a plant host within information-processing networks. Biopolym. Cell, 29: 234-243.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Krings, M., T.N. Taylor, H. Hass, H. Kerp, N. Dotzler and E.J. Hermsen, 2007. Fungal endophytes in a 400-million-yr-old land plant: Infection pathways, spatial distribution and host responses. New Phytol., 174: 648-657.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Garcia, K. and S.D. Zimmermann, 2014. The role of mycorrhizal associations in plant potassium nutrition. Front. Plant Sci., Vol. 5.
    CrossRef    


  • Gazis, R., A. Kuo, R. Riley, K. LaButti and A. Lipzen et al., 2016. The genome of Xylona heveae provides a window into fungal endophytism. Fungal Biol., 120: 26-42.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Xu, X.H., Z.Z. Su, C. Wang, C.P. Kubicek and X.X. Feng et al., 2014. The rice endophyte Harpophora oryzae genome reveals evolution from a pathogen to a mutualistic endophyte. Scient. Rep., Vol. 4.
    CrossRef    


  • Kumar, U., C. Aggarwal, S. Paul and K. Annapurna, 2014. Endophytes as biocontrol agents of plant pathogens and insects. Kavaka, 41: 92-95.


  • Ryan, P.R., K. Germaine, A. Franks, D.J. Ryan and D.N. Dowling, 2008. Bacterial endophytes: Recent developments and applications. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 278: 1-9.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Anyasi, R.O. and H.L. Atagana, 2011. Biological remediation of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB) in the environment by microorganisms and plants. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 10: 18916-18938.
    Direct Link    


  • Azevedo, J.L., W. Maccheroni Jr., J.O. Pereira and W.L. de Araujo, 2000. Endophytic microorganisms: A review on insect control and recent advances on tropical plants. Electron. J. Biotechnol., 3: 40-65.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Afzal, M., Q.M. Khan and A. Sessitsch, 2014. Endophytic bacteria: Prospects and applications for the phytoremediation of organic pollutants. Chemosphere, 117: 232-242.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Aly, A.H., A. Debbab and P. Proksch, 2013. Fungal endophytes-secret producers of bioactive plant metabolites. Die Pharmazie-Int. J. Pharm. Sci., 68: 499-505.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Atagana, H.I., R.O. Anyasi and N. Nogemane, 2013. Root development of Chromolaena odorata stem cuttings enhanced by indole butyric acid. Pak. J. Bot., 45: 1363-1368.
    Direct Link    


  • Stepniewska, Z. and A. Kuzniar, 2013. Endophytic microorganisms-promising applications in bioremediation of greenhouse gases. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 97: 9589-9596.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Andreolli, M., S. Lampis, M. Poli, G. Gullner, B. Biro and G. Vallini, 2013. Endophytic Burkholderia fungorum DBT1 can improve phytoremediation efficiency of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Chemosphere, 92: 688-694.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Germaine, K.J., X. Liu, G.G. Cabellos, J.P. Hogan, D. Ryan and D.N. Dowling, 2006. Bacterial endophyte-enhanced phytoremediation of the organochlorine herbicide 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 57: 302-310.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Doty, S.L., 2008. Enhancing phytoremediation through the use of transgenics and endophytes. New Phytol., 179: 318-333.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Khan, Z. and S. Doty, 2011. Endophyte-assisted phytoremediation. Plant Biol., 12: 97-105.
    Direct Link    


  • Backman, P.A. and R.A. Sikora, 2008. Endophytes: An emerging tool for biological control. Biol. Control, 46: 1-3.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Anyasi, R.O. and H.I. Atagana, 2011. Biological remediation of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in the soil and sediments by microorganisms and plants. Afr. J. Plant Sci., 5: 373-389.
    Direct Link    


  • Yu, H., L. Zhang, L. Li, C. Zheng and L. Guo et al., 2010. Recent developments and future prospects of antimicrobial metabolites produced by endophytes. Microbiol. Res., 165: 437-449.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gao, Y., Q. Liu, P. Zang, X. Li and Q. Ji et al., 2015. An endophytic bacterium isolated from Panax ginseng CA Meyer enhances growth, reduces morbidity and stimulates ginsenoside biosynthesis. Phytochem. Lett., 11: 132-138.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Winther, J.L. and W.E. Friedman, 2008. Arbuscular mycorrhizal associations in Lycopodiaceae. New Phytol., 177: 790-801.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hardoim, P.R., L.S. van Overbeek and J.D. van Elsas, 2008. Properties of bacterial endophytes and their proposed role in plant growth. Trends Microbiol., 16: 463-471.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Sun, H., J. Xu, S. Yang, G. Liu and S. Dai, 2004. Plant uptake of aldicarb from contaminated soil and its enhanced degradation in the rhizosphere. Chemosphere, 54: 569-574.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zhang, X.X., A. George, M.J. Bailey and P.B. Rainey, 2006. The histidine utilization (hut) genes of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 are active on plant surfaces, but are not required for competitive colonization of sugar beet seedlings. Microbiology, 152: 1867-1875.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tan, R.X. and W.X. Zou, 2001. Endophytes: A rich source of functional metabolites. Nat. Prod. Rep., 18: 448-459.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Huang, W.Y., Y.Z. Cai, J. Xing, H. Corke and M. Sun, 2007. A potential antioxidant resource: Endophytic fungi from medicinal plants. Econ. Bot., 61: 14-30.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tenberge, K.B., 1999. Biology and Life Strategy of Ergot Fungi. Institut fur Botanik, Munster, Gemany


  • Bast, F., S. Bhushan and A.A. John, 2014. DNA barcoding of a new record of epi-endophytic green algae Ulvella leptochaete (Ulvellaceae, Chlorophyta) in India. J. Biosci., 39: 711-716.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Li, J., G.Z. Zhao, H.H. Chen, S. Qin, L.H. Xu, C.L. Jiang and W.J. Li, 2008. Rhodococcus cercidiphylli sp. nov., a new endophytic actinobacterium isolated from a Cercidiphyllum japonicum leaf. Syst. Applied Microbiol., 31: 108-113.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kan, F.L., Z.Y. Chen, E.T. Wang, C.F. Tian, X.H. Sui and W.X. Chen, 2007. Characterization of symbiotic and endophytic bacteria isolated from root nodules of herbaceous legumes grown in Qinghai-Tibet plateau and in other zones of China. Arch. Microbiol., 188: 103-115.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wang, L., W. Zhang, Q. Pan, H. Li, M. Tao and X. Gao, 2009. Isolation and molecular identification of endophytic fungi from Aquilaria sinensis. J. Fungal Res., 7: 37-42.
    Direct Link    


  • Castillo, U.F., G.A. Strobel, E.J. Ford, W.M. Hess and H. Porter et al., 2002. Munumbicins, wide-spectrum antibiotics produced by Streptomyces NRRL 30562, endophytic on Kennedia nigriscans. Microbiology, 148: 2675-2685.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bezerra, J.D., C.C. Nascimento, R.D.N. Barbosa, D.C. da Silva and V.M. Svedese et al., 2015. Endophytic fungi from medicinal plant Bauhinia forficate: Diversity and biotechnological potential. Braz. J. Microbiol., 46: 49-57.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Moore, F.P., T. Barac, B. Borremans, L. Oeyen and J. Vangronsveld et al., 2006. Endophytic bacterial diversity in poplar trees growing on a BTEX-contaminated site: The characterisation of isolates with potential to enhance phytoremediation. Syst. Applied Microbiol., 29: 539-556.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yrjala, K., G. Mancano, C. Fortelius, M.L. Akerman and T.P. Sipila, 2010. The incidence of Burkholderia in epiphytic and endophytic bacterial cenoses in hybrid aspen grown on sandy peat. Boreal Environ. Res., 15: 81-96.
    Direct Link    


  • Li, H.Y., D.Q. Wei, M. Shen and Z.P. Zhou, 2012. Endophytes and their role in phytoremediation. Fungal Divers., 54: 11-18.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Taghavi, S., N. Weyens, J. Vangronsveld and D. van der Lelie, 2011. Improved Phytoremediation of Organic Contaminants Through Engineering of Bacterial Endophytes of Trees. In: Endophytes of Forest Trees. Forestry Sciences, Vol. 80, Pirttila, A. and A. Frank (Eds.)., Springer, Dordrecht, pp: 205-216


  • Weyens, N., K. Schellingen, B. Beckers, J. Janssen and R. Ceulemans et al., 2013. Potential of willow and its genetically engineered associated bacteria to remediate mixed Cd and toluene contamination. J. Soils Sediments, 13: 176-188.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kim, T.U., S.H. Cho, J.H. Han, Y.M. Shin, H.B. Lee and S.B. Kim, 2012. Diversity and physiological properties of root endophytic actinobacteria in native herbaceous plants of Korea. J. Microbiol., 50: 50-57.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kusari, S., S.P. Pandey and M. Spiteller, 2013. Untapped mutualistic paradigms linking host plant and endophytic fungal production of similar bioactive secondary metabolites. Phytochemistry, 91: 81-87.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dutta, D., K.C. Puzari, R. Gogoi and P. Dutta, 2014. Endophytes: Exploitation as a tool in plant protection. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol., 57: 621-629.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tanaka, A., M.J. Christensen, D. Takemoto, P. Park and B. Scott, 2006. Reactive oxygen species play a role in regulating a fungus-perennial ryegrass mutualistic interaction. Plant Cell, 18: 1052-1066.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Xu, Z., D. Gao, X. Sung and Y. Xu, 2012. A review of endophyte and its use and function. Adv. Biomed. Eng., 8: 124-130.


  • Sun, K., J. Liu, L. Jin and Y. Gao, 2014. Utilizing pyrene-degrading endophytic bacteria to reduce the risk of plant pyrene contamination. Plant Soil, 374: 251-262.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lopez-Fernandez, S., S. Compant, U. Vrhovsek, P.L. Bianchedi, A. Sessitsch, I. Pertot and A. Campisano, 2016. Grapevine colonization by endophytic bacteria shifts secondary metabolism and suggests activation of defense pathways. Plant Soil, 405: 155-175.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Liu, J., S. Liu, K. Sun, Y. Sheng, Y. Gu and Y. Gao, 2014. Colonization on root surface by a phenanthrene-degrading endophytic bacterium and its application for reducing plant phenanthrene contamination. PLoS One, Vol. 9, No. 9.
    CrossRef    


  • Peng, A., J. Liu, Y. Gao and Z. Chen, 2013. Distribution of endophytic bacteria in Alopecurus aequalis Sobol and Oxalis corniculata L. from soils contaminated by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. PLoS One, Vol. 8, No. 12.
    CrossRef    


  • Muponda, L., 2014. An investigation into the anthelmintic properties of seed extracts from endophyte containing pasture grasses. Masters Thesis, Lincoln University, New Zealand.


  • Elmi, A.A., C.P. West, R.T. Robbins and T.L. Kirkpatrick, 2000. Endophyte effects on reproduction of a root‐knot nematode (Meloidogyne marylandi) and osmotic adjustment in tall fescue. Grass For. Sci., 55: 166-172.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Weyens, N., D. van der Lelie, S. Taghavi, L. Newman and J. Vangronsveld, 2009. Exploiting plant-microbe partnerships to improve biomass production and remediation. Trends Biotechnol., 27: 591-598.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Bulgari, D., P. Casati, P. Crepaldi, D. Daffonchio, F. Quaglino, L. Brusetti and P.A. Bianco, 2011. Restructuring of endophytic bacterial communities in grapevine yellows-diseased and recovered Vitis vinifera L. plants. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 77: 5018-5022.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Sheng, X.F., J.J. Xia, C.Y. Jiang, L.Y. He and M. Qian, 2008. Characterization of heavy metal-resistant endophytic bacteria from rape (Brassica napus) roots and their potential in promoting the growth and lead accumulation of rape. Environ. Pollut., 156: 1164-1170.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kuldau, G. and C. Bacon, 2008. Clavicipitaceous endophytes: Their ability to enhance resistance of grasses to multiple stresses. Biol. Control, 46: 57-71.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mangunwardoyo, W., S. Suciatmih and I. Gandjar, 2012. Frequency of endophytic fungi isolated from Dendrobium crumenatum Sw. (Pigeon orchid) and antimicrobial activity. Biodiversitas, 13: 34-39.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • McGuinness, M. and D. Dowling, 2009. Plant-associated bacterial degradation of toxic organic compounds in soil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 6: 2226-2247.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Van Aken, B., P.A. Correa and J.L. Schnoor, 2010. Phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyls: New trends and promises. Environ. Sci. Technol., 44: 2767-2776.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Anyasi, R.O. and H.I. Atagana, 2018. Profiling of plants at petroleum contaminated site for phytoremediation. Int. J. Phytorem., 20: 352-361.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Segura, A. and J.L. Ramos, 2013. Plant-bacteria interactions in the removal of pollutants. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 24: 467-473.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • MacKinnon, G. and H.J. Duncan, 2013. Phytotoxicity of branched cyclohexanes found in the volatile fraction of diesel fuel on germination of selected grass species. Chemosphere, 90: 952-957.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Weyens, N., D. van der Lelie, T. Artois, K. Smeets and S. Taghavi et al., 2009. Bioaugmentation with engineered endophytic bacteria improves contaminant fate in phytoremediation. Environ. Sci. Technol., 43: 9413-9418.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Hur, M., Y. Kim, H.R. Song, J.M. Kim, Y.I. Choi and H. Yi, 2011. Effect of genetically modified poplars on soil microbial communities during the phytoremediation of waste mine tailings. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 77: 7611-7619.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wei, J., X. Liu, Q. Wang, C. Wang, X. Chen and H. Li, 2014. Effect of rhizodeposition on pyrene bioaccessibility and microbial structure in pyrene and pyrene-lead polluted soil. Chemosphere, 97: 92-97.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Van Aken, B., R. Tehrani and J.L. Schnoor, 2011. Endophyte-Assisted Phytoremediation of Explosives in Poplar Trees by Methylobacterium populi BJ001T. In: Endophytes of Forest Trees. Forestry Sciences, Vol. 80, Pirttila, A. and A. Frank (Eds.)., Springer, Dordrecht, pp: 217-234


  • Eapen, S., S. Singh and S.F. D'Souza, 2007. Advances in development of transgenic plants for remediation of xenobiotic pollutants. Biotechnol. Adv., 25: 442-451.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sessitsch, A., M. Kuffner, P. Kidd, J. Vangronsveld, W.W. Wenzel, K. Fallmann and M. Puschenreiter, 2013. The role of plant-associated bacteria in the mobilization and phytoextraction of trace elements in contaminated soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 60: 182-194.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tang, X., M.Z. Hashmi, D. Long, L. Chen, M.I. Khan and C. Shen, 2014. Influence of heavy metals and PCBs pollution on the enzyme activity and microbial community of paddy soils around an e-waste recycling workshop. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 11: 3118-3131.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Nagabhyru, P., R.D. Dinkins, C.L. Wood, C.W. Bacon and C.L. Schardl, 2013. Tall fescue endophyte effects on tolerance to water-deficit stress. BMC Plant Biol., Vol. 13, No. 1.
    CrossRef    


  • Lopez-Fernandez, S., P. Sonego, M. Moretto, M. Pancher, K. Engelen, I. Pertot and A. Campisano, 2015. Whole-genome comparative analysis of virulence genes unveils similarities and differences between endophytes and other symbiotic bacteria. Front. Microbiol., Vol. 6.
    CrossRef    


  • Schulz, B. and C. Boyle, 2006. What are Endophytes?. In: Microbial Root Endophytes, Schulz, B.J.E., C.J.C. Boyle and T.N. Siever (Eds.)., Springer Verlag, Berlin, ISBN: 9783540335252, pp: 1-13
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Findlay, J.A., S. Bethelezi, G. Li and M. Sevek, 1997. Insect toxins from an endophytic fungus from wintergreen. J. Nat. Prod., 60: 1214-1215.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mousa, W.K. and M.N. Raizada, 2013. The diversity of anti-microbial secondary metabolites produced by fungal endophytes: An interdisciplinary perspective. Front Microbiol., Vol. 4.
    CrossRef    


  • Wang, Z., Z. Ma, L. Wang, C. Tang, Z. Hu, G. Chou and W. Li, 2015. Active anti-acetylcholinesterase component of secondary metabolites produced by the endophytic fungi of Huperzia serrata. Electron. J. Biotechnol., 18: 399-405.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schmidt, R., M. Koberl, A. Mostafa, E.M. Ramadan and M. Monschein et al., 2014. Effects of bacterial inoculants on the indigenous microbiome and secondary metabolites of chamomile plants. Front. Microbiol., Vol. 5.
    CrossRef    


  • Lacava, P.T. and J.L. Azevedo, 2014. Biological Control of Insect-Pest and Diseases by Endophytes. In: Advances in Endophytic Research, Verma, V. and A. Gange (Eds.). Springer, New Delhi, pp: 231-256


  • Wani, Z.A., N. Ashraf, T. Mohiuddin and S. Riyaz-Ul-Hassan, 2015. Plant-endophyte symbiosis, an ecological perspective. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 99: 2955-2965.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zabalgogeazcoa, I., 2008. Fungal endophytes and their interaction with plant pathogens: A review. Spanish J. Agric. Res., 6: 138-146.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Adame-Alvarez, R.M., J. Mendiola-Soto and M. Heil, 2014. Order of arrival shifts endophyte-pathogen interactions in bean from resistance induction to disease facilitation. FEMS Microbiol. Lett., 355: 100-107.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Suryanarayanan, T.S., N. Thirunavukkarasu, M.B. Govindarajulu, F. Sasse, R. Jansen and T.S. Murali, 2009. Fungal endophytes and bioprospecting. Fungal Biol. Rev., 23: 9-19.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Barzanti, R., F. Ozino, M. Bazzicalupo, R. Gabbrielli, F. Galardi, C. Gonnelli and A. Mengoni, 2006. Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from the nickel hyperaccumulator plant Alyssum bertolonii. Microbial. Ecol., 53: 306-316.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Shin, M.N., J. Shim, Y. You, H. Myung and K.S. Bang et al., 2012. Characterization of lead resistant endophytic Bacillus sp. MN3-4 and its potential for promoting lead accumulation in metal hyperaccumulator Alnus firma. J. Hazard. Mater., 199: 314-320.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sheng, X., X. Chen and L. He, 2008. Characteristics of an endophytic pyrene-degrading bacterium of Enterobacter sp. 12J1 from Allium macrostemon Bunge. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad., 62: 88-95.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mastretta, C., S. Taghavi, D. van der Lelie, A. Mengoni and F. Galardi et al., 2009. Endophytic bacteria from seeds of Nicotiana tabacum can reduce cadmium phytotoxicity. Int. J. Phytorem., 11: 251-267.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Luo, S.L., L. Chen, J.L., Chen, X. Xiao and T.Y. Xu et al., 2011. Analysis and characterization of cultivable heavy metal-resistant bacterial endophytes isolated from Cd-hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. and their potential use for phytoremediation. Chemosphere, 85: 1130-1138.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Madhaiyan, M., S. Poonguzhali and T. Sa, 2007. Influence of plant species and environmental conditions on epiphytic and endophytic pink-pigmented facultative methylotrophic bacterial populations associated with field-grown rice cultivars. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 17: 1645-1654.
    Direct Link    


  • Xiao, X., S. Luo, G. Zeng, W. Wei and Y. Wan et al., 2010. Biosorption of cadmium by Endophytic Fungus (EF) Microsphaeropsis sp. LSE10 isolated from cadmium hyperaccumulator Solanum nigrum L. Bioresour. Technol., 101: 1668-1670.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wang, Q. and L.D. Guo, 2010. Ectomycorrhizal community composition of Pinus tabulaeformis assessed by ITS-RFLP and ITS sequences. Botany, 88: 590-595.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Weyens, N., S. Cross, J. Dupae, L. Newman, D. van der Lelie, R. Carleer and R. Vangronsveld, 2010. Endophytic bacteria improve phytoremediation of Ni and TCE co-contamination. Environ. Pollut., 158: 2422-2427.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved