HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2018 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 5 | Page No.: 239-244
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2018.239.244
Prevalence of Ochratoxin A in Poultry Feed and Meat from Jordan
Nazieh .I. AL khalaileh

Abstract: Background and Objective: Ochratoxin A (OTA) is a fungal metabolite produced in feed and could be transmitted to food chain through animal and considered as one of the potent carcinogenic compound. This study aimed to evaluate the levels of Ochratoxin A in both poultry feed and meat in Jordan. Materials and Methods: About 129 samples representing feed, corn and poultry meat were collected from different location of Jordan market and evaluated for Ochratoxin A by ELISA. Results: About 38.5% of feed sample, 50.0% of corn sample, 100.0% of feed sample found under sun light were containing an Ochratoxin A (OTA) with an average concentration of 2.90±0.26, 2.35±0.32, 10.30±0.59 μg kg–1, respectively. Also the results showed that between 66.0% (12 sample) to 100.0% (54 sample of the analyzed organs meat sample contains OTA with a concentration ranging from 1.89±0.07-7.68±0.12 μg kg–1. Conclusion: The results indicated that none of the tested samples exceeded the maximum limit set by the EU limits of <50.0 ng km–1 in poultry feeds.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Nazieh .I. AL khalaileh , 2018. Prevalence of Ochratoxin A in Poultry Feed and Meat from Jordan. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 21: 239-244.

Keywords: poultry meat, contamination, ochratoxin A, ELISA and toxicity

INTRODUCTION

In Jordan, poultry production considered as one of the major industrial sectors that is important in the national economy and a competitive products to meet the nutritional needs for consumer because poultry protein is cheap compared with other animal proteins1.

Poultry feed is the corner stone of poultry industry, which account of more than 60% of the production process expenses, that used to be imported from countries includes India, European countries to full fill the requirements of poultry sector from feed to sustain and improve poultry industry in Jordan1.

Worldwide including Jordan, the contaminated poultry feed gain attention as major source for toxins hazards associated with human health and increases the number of cancer cases registered in various countries including Jordan2.

Poultry feed contamination with mycotoxins such as ochratoxin is of concerns in agricultural various produce3, ochratoxin are groups of fungal metabolite consists of three types, A, B and C . Ochratoxin A (OTA) is the most prevalent and the most toxic4-6 and considered as a secondary toxic metabolite produced mainly by some strains of fungi such as Aspergillus ochraceus It is the main producers to ochratoxin at moderate temperatures with high water activity and Preferably growing in oilseeds (peanuts and soybeans) more than in grain crops, such as wheat and corn7-10 and Penicillium verrucosum species which grows at cool temperate regions (5-30°C) with law water activity Thus produce ochratoxin in wheat and corn11,12. Also, nutritional, humidity, water activity and integrity of the seeds are factors that influence on mold growth and produce ochratoxin13.

The cereal and cereal products are the main contributors to human toxicity risk by OTA compared to other foodstuff of plant origin14. Generally, OTA formation occurs mainly as a result of a direct fungal contamination to crops and animal feed during growth in the field or post-harvest especially when favorable environmental conditions for growing fungi are available15,16.

Food and contaminated poultry feed with Ochratoxin is potentially hazardous to the health of humans as well as poultry because of their carcinogenic effects, where in broilers, major clinical signs of feed consumption with OTA are poor growth, reduced feed efficiency and increased water consumption which is a consequence of damaged kidneys17,18 also when, long-term exposure to Ochratoxin A could result in high mortality rate4, while other animals such as cows and sheep’s as a ruminant animals are generally capable to hydrolyze OTA to the non-toxic metabolites by the rumen micro flora in the stomachs before absorption and release it into the blood19-21.

The International Agency for Research on Cancer has classified OTA as a possible carcinogen and placed in-group 2B carcinogen to humans22.

The major risk to human health not only through the intake of contaminated foods of vegetable origin with ochratoxin A but also through eating meat of animals that fed on contaminated feed with OTA such as pork and poultry and dairy products14,23. Digesting food contaminated with ochratoxin by human for a long time established to disease known as ochratoxicosis, that mainly could damage the kidneys4-6.

Level of safe intake of ochratoxin A set at100 ng kg–1 body weight per week and this level prevent the health and economic effects24. Also the European Commission has established a regulation list for the maximum tolerable limits of OTA in foodstuff commodities, such as cereals (5 μg kg–1), cereal products (3 μg kg–1), dried fruits (10 μg kg–1) and foodstuff for baby and children less than three years of age of 0.5 μg kg–1 25.

According the above information about toxicity and health risk of Ochratoxin A on consumer health and because these compounds have great heat-stable to heat treatment such as process of cooking and sterilization, which makes the consumption of mycotoxin contaminated animal-derived food a potential health hazard on consumer health8. Although the presence of OTA is increasingly regulated in most the countries of Europe and America and there are a lot of studies which related directly or indirectly to each other but up until now, in most Middle East countries, including Jordan no regulation limits are in force about level of ochratoxin in poultry feed and meat which prevent the health and economic effects also the laboratory tests for detection of OTA not available in most countries regional and studies are very limited. Thus this study designed: to evaluate the extent of contamination of poultry feed and meat circulated in Jordan market with Ochratoxin A by using Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assay and compare them with maximum level recommended by the European Commission and some countries in the region. This study will contribute to raising awareness about the importance of legislation and laws that show the level of ochratoxins allowed in poultry feed and meat at national and regional level.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sample collection: A total of 57 poultry feed samples of 1 kg each were collected from different poultry chicken grower (broiler and layers) representing different regions in Jordan governorate of which 6 samples collected from bags placed under sunlight and 72 poultry meat samples collected from different commercial sources were stored in ice box during transportation and stored in plastic bags at 4°C, until detection of Ochratoxin A.

The sample collected during spring and summer seasons from April, 2016 until August, 2016 and analyzed at Jordan University.

Sample preparation for ELISA analysis: About100-200 g from each samples were ground and mixed prior to the extraction procedure then grinded feed passed through a sieve of 1 mm opening using Poltron miller (Kinematica, Lucerne, Switzerland).

Five gram of ground sample was extracted with 12.5 mL of 70% methanol by shaking vigorously for 3 min, the mixture was filtered using a filter paper (Whatman No. 1, Germany). One milliliter of the filtrate was mixed with 1 mL of deionized water.

The prepared samples were tested using microplate enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) quantitative test kits (Ridascreen , r-biofarm, Germany) and ELISA reader (Expert plus, Switzerland). The quantitative analyses for Ochratoxin A (Sigma Chemical. St. Louis, MO, USA)26, procedure was followed for extraction of OTA from flesh samples.

The samples were analyzed using the Ochratoxin A test procedure (Art. No. R5402) as described by r-biofarm test procedure kit (RIDASCREEN® FAST, Ochratoxin A 10-01-27)27.

Ochratoxin A working standard solutions: Five working standard dilutions of 0 (zero standard), 5, 10 , 20 , 40 μg kg–1, Ochratoxin A in methanol /water were provided with ELISA kit. Ochratoxin A was used and immunoassayed in triplicate (RIDASCREEN® FAST, Ochratoxin A 10-01-)27.

Test procedure: Pipit 50 μL of standard dilutions or prepared sample into separate wells, then add 50 μL of enzyme conjugate and add 50 μL of anti-Ochratoxin A antibody solution to each well. Mix gently by shaking the plate manually and incubate for 10 min at room temperature (20-25°C). Add 100 μL of substrate/chromogen to each well. Mix gently by shaking the plate manually and incubate for 5 min at room temperature (20-25°C), 100 μL of stop solution was added to each well, mix gently by shaking the plate manually and read the absorbance at 450 nm (RIDASCREEN® FAST, Ochratoxin A 10-01-27 )27.

Statistical analysis: The results for OTA obtained by ELISA reader were statistically analyzed and given as the arithmetic means and standard deviations by using statistical analysis program the SPSS software version 9.5 (SPSS, Cary, NC, USA)

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Ochratoxin A in poultry feed: The results obtained for the concentration of Ochratoxin A in poultry feed are presented in Table 1. It showed that 38.5% of feed samples, 50.0% of corn and 100.0% of feed samples collected from lots found under sun light were contaminated with OTA. The mean concentration of the contaminated samples tested range between 2.35-10.31 (μg kg–1) compared to minimum and maximum concentration of OTA of 1.54-27.11 μg kg–1 with the maximum level of OTA was found in feed samples exposed to sun light. Although that Farmers are often tempted to incorporate moldy grain of low price into animal diets to reduce feed costs. However, this practice causes a risk for mycotoxin contamination and alters nutrient content of the grain28. The results found are in agreement with Published report by Domijan et al.29, it results showed that the contaminated feed with OTA ranges between 0.42-6.19 μg kg–1. While in Italy Schiavone et al.30, who found that OTA in poultry feed samples ranges between 0.04-6.5 μg kg–1 which is in agreement of the values found in the current study. Also Jaimez et al.31, who found the level of OTA in feed samples in Spain was 1.53 μg kg–1.

Cereals, oilseeds contaminated with OTA or products of animal origin such as poultry when animals are fed on contaminated feed with OTA is the major cause of that exposure of these OTA to animals and therefore ultimately to humans21,32.

The concentration of OTA found in animal feeds varies from country to country but the levels recommended by the EU legislation (2006/576/EC, <50 μg kg–1) 12. However, none of the samples that collected contained more than the maximum level recommended by the European Commission.

Also the results found are means that the feed storage under the sunlight will increases the risk of mold growth and ochratoxin A production. Which do not degrade under sunlight, The results found are in agreement with previews report by Schiavone et al.30, While Herzallah et al.33 showed that mycotoxin such as aflatoxin after 30 h of exposure to sunlight more than 60% is degraded.

Ochratoxin A in poultry meat: The levels of OTA in poultry meat obtained in this study are presented in Table 2.

Table 1: Ochratoxin A concentration in different poultry feed*
*Values are Means±SD of a triplicate

Table 2: Incidence of OTA in tissue of slaughtered chicken*
*Values are Means±SD of a triplicate

The results showed that the 100% of thigh and legs, Liver, gizzard samples and 66.6% of breast samples were contaminated with OTA with an average concentration of 2.61±0.27, 5.86±0.39 , 2.073±0.13 and 3.062±0.30 μg kg–1 respectively, with minimum and maximum concentration were between 1.891±0.07 and 7.681±0.12 μg kg–1 for gizzard and liver, respectively. Also the results showed that OTA levels in liver were higher than those found in breast, thigh, legs and gizzard. These results were in agreement with the results obtained by Iqbal et al.34.

About 41% chicken meat samples were contaminated with OTA. and OTA level in liver of chicken was highest mean level (2.41±0.72 μg kg–1) Markov et al.35, who found that OTA level in commercial sausage samples was 7.83 μg kg–1. On the contrary the Persi et al.36 found that OTA level in liver samples was 13.77 μg kg–1. It is higher than results these study Joo et al.37 found that the level of OTA in animal tissues increased as the OTA level in feed increase.

All samples found to contain OTA less than (10 ng kg–1) recommended by the European Commission (FAO/WHO)38.

Human exposure to Ochratoxin A occurs mainly through consumption of contaminated crops or food derived from animals exposed to contaminated feedstuffs such as meat and meat produce39. Also (Iacumin et al.40 found that molds such as Aspergillus ochraceus produce OTA in meat speck and Vipotnik et al.41, who found that Aspergillus westerdijkiae produce OTA in dry-cured ham flesh.

CONCLUSION

The daily intake of OTA through chicken meat depends on the OTA concentration in the food, the amount OTA consumed and the frequency of consumption OTA. In addition, the concentration of OTA in chicken tissues is generally low and the total of Ochratoxin A intake from chicken products is very small compared with other sources. The level of OTA in all samples used in the study were contained less than the maximum level recommended by the European Commission but higher the safe intake of 100 ng kg–1 body weight per week recommended.

SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT

This study found that feed and poultry flesh samples found contaminated with OTA of the possibilities of exceeding the permitted levels set by EU. The data found in this study will provide valuable information for the government agencies responsible for feed food quality to consider the presence of OTA in the feed source and in order to evaluate the risk of OTA contamination on consumer health.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The author would like to thank the University of Jordan for using the ELISA reader and Mutah University for providing their facilities in analyzing the samples.

REFERENCES

  • Agricultural Minstery, 2011. Annual report 2011. Agricultural Minstery, Amman, Jordan.


  • Wild, C.P. and Y.Y. Gong, 2010. Mycotoxins and human disease: A largely ignored global health issue. Carcinogenesis, 31: 71-82.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Pittet, A., 1998. Natural occurrence of mycotoxins in foods and feeds-An updated review. Rev. Med. Vet., 149: 479-492.


  • Marquardt, R.R. and A.A. Frohlich, 1992. A review of recent advances in understanding ochratoxicosis. J. Anim. Sci., 70: 3968-3988.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Ringot, D., A. Chango, Y.J. Schneider and Y. Larondelle, 2006. Toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of ochratoxin A, An update. Chemico-Biol. Int., 159: 18-46.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pfohl-Leszkowicz, A. and R.A. Manderville, 2007. Ochratoxin A: An overview on toxicity and carcinogenicity in animals and humans. Mol. Nutr. Food Res., 51: 61-99.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Iheshiulor, O.O.M., B.O. Esonu, O.K. Chuwuka, A.A. Omede, I.C. Okoli and I.P. Ogbuewu, 2011. Effects of mycotoxins in animal nutrition: A review. Asian J. Anim. Sci., 5: 19-33.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Iqbal, S.Z., T. Rabbani, M.R. Asi and S. Jinap, 2014. Assessment of aflatoxins, ochratoxin A and zearalenone in breakfast cereals. Food Chem., 157: 257-262.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • WHO., 2002. WHO technical report series 906. Evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food: Fifty-sixth report of the Joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, pp: 70.


  • Shamsudeen, P., H.P. Shrivastava, R. Singh and D. Chandra, 2013. Effect of chelated and inorganic trace minerals on aflatoxin synthesis in maize. J. Poult. Sci. Technol., 1: 13-16.
    Direct Link    


  • Madhyastha, S.M., R.R. Marquardt, A.A. Frohlich, G. Platford and D. Abramson, 1990. Effects of different cereal and oilseed substrates on the growth and production of toxins by Aspergillus alutaceus and Penicillium verrucosum. J. Agric. Food Chem., 38: 1506-1510.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Abbas, A., H. Valez and A.D. Dobson, 2009. Analysis of the effect of nutritional factors on OTA and OTB biosynthesis and polyketide synthase gene expression in Aspergillus ochraceus. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 135: 22-27.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • International Program of Chemical Safety, 1990. Environmental health criteria 105. Mycotoxins: ochratoxins, tricothecenes, ergot. World Health Organisation, Geneva.


  • EFSA., 2004. Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the Commission related to ochratoxin A (OTA) as undesirable substance in animal feed. EFSA J., Vol. 101.


  • Mantle, P.G., 2008. Interpretation of the pharmacokinetics of ochratoxin A in blood plasma of rats, during and after acute or chronic ingestion. Food Chem. Toxicol., 46: 1808-1816.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • European Commission Regulation, 2002. Reports on tasks for scientific cooperation. Report of experts participating in task 3.2.7. Assessment of dietary intake of ochratoxin A by the population of EU member states. European Commission Regulation, SCOOP Task 3.2.7, January, 2002.


  • Leeson, S., G. Diaz and J.D. Summers, 1995. Poultry Metabolic Disorders and Mycotoxins. University Books, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, pp: 227-241


  • Milicevic, D.R., M. Jovanovic, V.F. Matekalo-Sverak, T. Radicevic, M.M. Petrovic and D.Z. Vukovic, 2011. Residue of ochratoxin a in chicken tissues-risk assessment. Arch. Oncol., 19: 23-27.
    Direct Link    


  • Kiessling, K.H., H. Pettersson, K. Sandholm and M. Olsen, 1984. Metabolism of aflatoxin, ochratoxin, zearalenone and three trichothecenes by intact rumen fluid, rumen protozoa and rumen bacteria. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 47: 1070-1073.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • EFSA., 2006. Opinion of the scientific panel on contaminants in the food chain on a request from the commission related to ochratoxin a in food. EFSA J., 365: 1-56.
    Direct Link    


  • Bryden, W.L., 2012. Mycotoxin contamination of the feed supply chain: Implications for animal productivity and feed security. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 173: 134-158.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • IARC., 1993. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans Volume 56. Some naturally occurring substances: Food items and constituents, heterocyclic aromatic amines and mycotoxins. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France, pp: 245-395.


  • Sweeney, M.J., S. White and A.D.W. Dobson, 2000. Mycotoxins in agriculture and food safety. Irish J. Agric. Food. Res., 39: 235-244.
    Direct Link    


  • JECFA., 2002. Evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food. 56th report of the joint FAO/WHO expert committee on food additives. Technical reports series No. 906. FAO/WHO., Italy, Rome.


  • European Commission, 2006. Commission regulation (EC) No. 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Official J. Eur. Union, L364: 5-24.
    Direct Link    


  • Guillamont, E.M., C.M. Lino, M.L. Baeta, A.S. Pena, I.N. Silveira and J.M. Vinuesa, 2005. A comparative study of extraction apparatus in HPLC analysis of ochratoxin A in muscle. Anal. Bioanal. Chem., 383: 570-575.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • R-Biopharm, 2015. RIDASCREEN®FAST, Ochratoxin A 10-01-27. Art. No. R5402. R-Biopharm AG, Darmstadt, Germany.


  • Sifou, A., N. Mahnine, L. Manyes, C. El Adlouni, M. El Azzouzi and A. Zinedine, 2016. Determination of ochratoxin A in poultry feeds available in Rabat area (Morocco) by high performance liquid chromatography. J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 7: 2229-2234.
    Direct Link    


  • Domijan, A.M., M. Peraica, Z. Jurjevic, D. Ivic and B. Cvjetkovic, 2005. Fumonisin B1, fumonisin B2, zearalenone and ochratoxin a contamination of maize in Croatia. Food Additiv. Contam., 22: 677-680.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schiavone, A., C. Cavallero, L. Girotto, L. Pozzo, S. Antoniazzi and L. Cavallarin, 2008. A survey on the occurrence of ochratoxin A in feeds and sera collected in conventional and organic poultry farms in Northern Italy. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 7: 495-503.


  • Jaimez, J., C.A. Fente, C.M. Franco, A. Cepeda and B.I. Vazquez, 2004. A survey of the fungal contamination and presence of ochratoxin A and zearalenone on Spanish feed and raw materials. J. Sci. Food Agric., 84: 832-840.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Duarte, S.C., A. Pena and C.M. Lino, 2010. A review on ochratoxin A occurrence and effects of processing of cereal and cereal derived food products. Food Microbiol., 27: 187-198.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Herzallah, S., K. Alshawabkeh and A.A. Fataftah, 2008. Aflatoxin decontamination of artificially contaminated feeds by sunlight, γ-radiation and microwave heating. J. Applied Poult. Res., 17: 515-521.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Iqbal, S.Z., S. Nisar, M.R. Asi and S. Jinap, 2014. Natural incidence of aflatoxins, ochratoxin A and zearalenone in chicken meat and eggs. Food Control, 43: 98-103.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Markov, K., J. Pleadin, M. Bevardi, N. Vahcic, D. Sokolic-Mihalak and J. Frece, 2013. Natural occurrence of aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A and citrinin in Croatian fermented meat products. Food Control, 34: 312-317.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Persi, N., J. Pleadin, D. Kovacevic, G. Scortichini and S. Milone, 2014. Ochratoxin A in raw materials and cooked meat products made from OTA-treated pigs. Meat Sci., 96: 203-210.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Joo, Y.D., C.W. Kang, B.K. An, J.S. Ahn and R. Borutova, 2013. Effect of Ochratoxin A and preventive action of mycotoxins-deactivation product in broiler chickens. Vet. IR Zootech. (Vet. Med. Zoot.), 61: 22-29.
    Direct Link    


  • FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives, 2001. Ochratoxin A, safety evaluation of certain mycotoxins in food; WHO food additives series 47. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper No. 74. Geneva, Switzerland, pp: 281.


  • Grajewski, J., A. Blajet‐Kosicka, M. Twaruzek and R. Kosicki, 2012. Occurrence of mycotoxins in Polish animal feed in years 2006-2009. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 96: 870-877.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Iacumin, L., M. Manzano, D. Andyanto and G. Comi, 2017. Biocontrol of ochratoxigenic moulds (Aspergillus ochraceus and Penicillium nordicum) by Debaryomyces hansenii and Saccharomycopsis fibuligera during speck production. Food Microbiol., 62: 188-195.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vipotnik, Z., A. Rodriguez and P. Rodrigues, 2017. Aspergillus westerdijkiae as a major ochratoxin A risk in dry-cured ham based-media. Int. J. Food Microbiol., 241: 244-251.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved