HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2017 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 11 | Page No.: 530-542
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2017.530.542
Identification and Management Challenges Associated with Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith), Causal Agent of Bacterial Wilt Disease of Tomato in Sub-Saharan Africa
Agatha Aloyce , Patrick Alois Ndakidemi and Ernest Rashid Mbega

Abstract: Tomato is the world’s most consumed vegetable crop after potato and it is source of vitamins, minerals, fiber, lycopene, β-carotene and income. Despite its significant importance tomato can heavily be attacked by different pathogens including Ralstonia solanacearum that incites bacteria wilt disease. The disease is very devastating causing a considerable yield loss worldwide. The pathogen can survive in plant debris, infected plants and host weeds and spread from one field to another by irrigation or flood water, soil, farm equipment and workers and weeds which usually grow along waterways and it is difficult to manage due to complication in biology, nature of infestation and wide host range. In areas like the Sub-Saharan Africa where there exists a wide diversity of plant species, the pathogen becomes even more difficult to manage. It is on this basis that this review article, clearly discusses challenges for bacterial wilt disease identification and management in tomato farming systems with respect to the diagnosis methods used, pathogen genetic diversity and host range and pathogen survival mechanisms under different environment. The information will empower the responsible personnel involved in tomato production chain to have clear information about the pathogen and management options available against the disease in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Agatha Aloyce, Patrick Alois Ndakidemi and Ernest Rashid Mbega, 2017. Identification and Management Challenges Associated with Ralstonia solanacearum (Smith), Causal Agent of Bacterial Wilt Disease of Tomato in Sub-Saharan Africa. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 20: 530-542.

Keywords: genetic, Bacterial wilt, host range, pathogen diversity and Ralstonia solanacearum

INTRODUCTION

Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) is the second most important vegetable crop after potato in the world1. It is one of the most consumed vegetable as a source of vitamins, minerals and fiber worldwide2,3. Tomato contains lycopene and β-carotene that have anti-cancer and antioxidant properties and hence considered as healthy2. Tomato has become the world agenda in the international horticultural forums due to its nutritive and economic importance4. In Tanzania, tomato is the first most important vegetable crop grown for consumption and income5,6. Tomato provides smallholder farmers with much higher income and more jobs per hectare than staple crops2.

The global tomato production is estimated to be 161 793 834 t/year7. Production of tomato in Tanzania is estimated to be 255 000 t/year with average yield of 17.5 t ha–1 compared with the global average yield of 33.6 t ha–1 1,7. Factors for low production of tomato include low soil fertility, drought and poor quality inputs including seeds, unreliable markets and pests8, 9. Of these, diseases have been cited to be the most limiting factor of tomato production in Sub Saharan Africa5,10,11. Of the diseases, bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum is classified as one of the world's most important phytopathogenic bacteria due to its lethality, persistence, wide host range and broad geographic distribution12,13. The pathogen is characterized to has a very large group of strains varying in their geographical origin, host range and pathogenic behavior worldwide14. It is quarantined organism15 ranked second after Pseudomonas syringaepathovars based on its economic importance worldwide16. The R. solanacearum is thought to be the most destructive plant pathogenic bacterium causing tomato yield losses ranging from 10-100% worldwide17. Yield losses depend on prevailing strain, cropping system, soil, climate and cultivar18.

Identification of the pathogen is believed to be the strongest foundation towards developing its management strategies18,19,20. Techniques for the diagnosis of bacterial wilt disease of tomato include observation of symptoms and bacterial streaming, plating on a semi-selective medium, immunodiagnostic assay by species-specific antibodies and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)18,21-23. However, use of such techniques is challenged by factors such as disease symptoms complex23 which complicate choice of appropriate identification methods19.

Different management approaches of bacterial wilt disease in tomato consists use of chemicals, biological agents, cultural and physical practices23. Efficacy of such methods are challenged by the pathogen genetic diversity of and existence of wide host range for the pathogen24,25. Being a complex plant pathogen, R. solanacearum is able to infect crops as a soil, water and/or seed borne pathogen12,26,27. It is an endophyte pathogen which can form genetically different strains and survive in extremely diverse environment travelling along waterways13,28. The bacterium is capable of conquering various host plants which increase its survival and persistence in the environment13,11,26. This study discusses identification and management challenges of bacterial wilt disease of tomato in relation to the genetic diversity, host range, plant infection machinery and disease diagnosis methods, thus highlighting the future research study so that sustainable disease management can be developed.

IDENTIFICATION CHALLENGES OF BACTERIAL WILT DISEASE IN TOMATO FARMING SYSTEMS

Identification challenges of bacterial wilt disease of tomato based on symptoms: It is often challenging to differentiate bacterial wilt disease symptoms from those caused by other disease causing factors29,30. Plant wilting can be a result of vascular bundles failing to function, high salinity, saturated soil or infection by bacteria, fungi and/or nematodes31. Secondary infections by other pathogens may interfere with those of R. solanacearum27. There are situations that some infected plants by the same bacterial wilt disease-causing pathogens do not show up symptoms30,32. This consequently, causes increased spread of bacterial wilt disease in the farming system. Therefore, studies should be conducted to complement symptoms with other plant disease diagnosis methods.

Identification challenges by using bacterial streaming technique: Bacterial streaming is an initial step to detect R. solanacearum in a plant tissue showing wilting symptoms under condition of adequate soil moisture in which a cut plant tissue exhibits bacterial slime by suspending vascular vessels in clean water18. The technique is simple and convenient to be performed in the field or laboratory33,34. However, it gives a generalized indication for the infection caused by bacteria but cannot be informative on the bacterial species or strain27. In addition, visibility of bacterial streaming by naked eye depends on bacterial population in the xylem which should not be low18. Research is needed to advance this technique in such a way that bacterial species can be detected so long as even at low population.

Identification challenges by using species-specific antibodies: This is a commercially developed diagnosis kit for the detection of R. solanacearum in plant tissue and culture in the field or laboratory. Test kit which usually contains immunostrips, sample extraction bags and user guide requires to be stored at lower temperatures of 2-8°C and should be tightly stored in the desiccated container at all times. Prior to use, immonostrips and extraction buffer need to be warmed at temperatures of 18-30°C to make test components ready foruse35.

In performing the test, a plant tissue of 0.15 g is taken from a wilting plant and put into an extraction buffer of 3 mL in a sample extraction bag. Presence or absence of R. solanacearum can then be detected from the strips as a positive or negative result. The test is sensitive with bacterial population from 105 CFU mL–1. The whole process usually takes about 5-30 min depending on pathogen titer in the sample. The technique could be one of the quicker and cheaper methods of detecting bacterial wilt disease however its application faces certain challenges in developing countries.

First, immunostrips are not readily available at the community level and hence expensive, this has limited their application and adoption as majority of farmers cannot afford19. Secondly, immunostrips is incapable of detecting bacterial population which is below 105 CFU mL–1 and can only detect R. solanacearum to the species level. Since R. solanacearum has a quarantine status, presence of bacterium even at low population has to be detected for prevention and management measures15. Third, the recommended storage temperature range of 2-8°C may not be achievable in tropical and subtropical countries where average temperature is high. Therefore, the immunostrips technology requires harmonization for the farming community in the Sub-Saharan Africa to use effectively and efficiently.

Identification challenges by using carbon source and semi-selective medium: The carbon source utilization method uses disaccharides and hexose alcohols for the determination of biovars of R. solanacearum35. Disaccharides used are maltose, cellobiose and lactose while hexose alcohols are sorbitol, dulcitol and Mannitol18. Biovars determination is imperative in development of management strategies18,32. The procedure is mainly performed by experts in specialized laboratories18,19. The semi-selective medium method constitutes isolation of R. solanacearum from plant tissues on a specific diagnostic media18. A major challenge of this technique is that it takes time (at least 3-6 days) to carry out and obtain diagnosis results. This may look to be long period to implement the required management measure as by then the plant will have wilted resulting into huge yield reduction14,18. Developing biosensors could be a way forward for timely implementation of management measures in Sub-Saharan Africa where techniques such as Immunodiagnostic assays still faces some challenges.

Identification challenges by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR): With PCR technique plant, soil or water samples suspected to contain R. solanacearum is subjected to DNA testing for identification purposes18. Various methods can be used for the DNA extraction using specific primers for R. solanacearum36,37. The technique is however considered as one of the most complicated and costly pathogen detection method38 as it depends on bacterium pure culture isolation, DNA extraction and testing. For instance, the procedure of obtaining a pure bacterium culture for DNA extraction, sequencing and sequence alignment is a process which is resources demanding. This limit technological application as well as adaption to benefit from its use in developing countries. Use of isothermal amplification which is more affordable and appropriate than DNA-based methods could be exploited in Sub-Saharan Africa.

MANAGEMENT CHALLENGES OF BACTERIAL WILT DISEASE IN TOMATO FARMING SYSTEMS

Several management methods of bacterial wilt disease have been reported as shown in Table 1. Based on the agent used and mechanism of action in disease management such methods are grouped as chemical, biological, cultural and physical methods39.

Management challenges due to the pathogen genetic diversity: Despite the availability of the several disease methods to combat bacterial wilt, this disease has not been successfully managed in Sub-Saharan Africa region. Breeding resistant cultivars against R. solanacearum for example has been popularly promoted as one of the best strategy to manage bacterial wilt disease12,26. However, success of breeding resistant cultivar against bacterial wilt disease is hampered by the genetic diversity of R. solanacearum23,26,113,36.

One of the factors for the failure of management methods could be attributed to the genetic diversity of R. solanacearum. There exists a wide genetic diversity of R. solanacearum worldwide13,24 and several authors have described the pathogen using different criteria.

Table 1: Bacterial wilt disease management approaches and mechanisms

For instance114, grouped species of R. Solanacearum in to five races based on geographical location while24,115 described the pathogen biovars based on their ability to utilize and/or oxidize hexose alcohols and disaccharides. The R. solanacearum has extremely wide host range infecting more than 200 species from over 50 plant families12,116. More information on distribution and host of the R. solanacearum races is as shown in Table 2.

Classifying R. solanacearum based on race or host is complex and they often overlap due to a wide range of strains, environments and host range, therefore, isolate biovars have been used to determine pathogen phylotype18,24. Phylotyping which is based on DNA sequence analysis divides strains of R. solanacearum into four phylotypes according to their geographical origin namely phylotype I, II, III and IV corresponds to strains from Asia, Americas, Africa and Indonesia, respectively31. Recent research suggest to group R. solanacearum species complex into three species: R. solanacearum (phylotype II), R. pseudosolanacearum (phylotype I and II), and R. syzygii (phylotype IV)112.

It is thus evidence that the environment in which R. solanacearum is found can determine prevailing race and the biovar and its virulence. Based on virulence, race 1 biovar 1 (R1B1) is considered as the most virulent but relatively uncommon as compared to race 1, race 2 biovar 1 and race 3, biovar 2 which are the most common and important strains in Africa15,117. Race 2 strains have a more limited host range than race 1 and mostly restricted to tropical environments while Race 3 biovar 2 is common throughout the world117. Since R. solanacearum has ability to change genetically and form new strains over a time, this may challenge management approach(es). Information on emergence of new strains of R. solanacearum in Sub-Saharan Africa is limited and thus calls for a research to generate and quantify the status of the prevailing pathogen stains.

Management challenges due to persistence of wide host range: R. solanacearum infect different host plants that are common in tomato farming systems and the host plants overlap as well24,33. Managing pathogen which is host of several and commonly cultivated plant species is challenging in the farming system. The use of crop rotation for example is challenged by the long period that R. solacearum, is capable to strive in the soil27,118. Effective crop rotation for R. solanacearum in infected land requires abandoning of land to grow host plants for 2-5 years119. This is in practice infeasible in the majority of small holder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa due to land scarcity issues. Crop rotation can be more challenging to growers who have ventured in protected vegetable cropping where tomato are grown in greenhouse structures and where investment is intense28. Once the greenhouse soil is infected by R. solanacearum, eradication is difficult and a grower suffers economic losses23. The mechanism used by R. solanacearum to concur wide range of host plant species is not well known. Study should be conducted to understand factors favoring capability of R. solanacearum to infect wide range of host plant species for better disease management.

Management challenges due to endophytic nature of R. solanacearum: The R. solanacearum enters plants via wounds, root tips or cracks at the sites of lateral root emergence13,18,120. Unlike many phytopathogenic bacteria, R. solanacearum potentially requires only one entry site to establish a systemic infection that results in bacterial wilt disease121. The bacterium subsequently colonizes the root cortex, invades the xylem vessels and reaches the stem and leaves through the vascular system27. It can then rapidly multiply in the xylem causing rapid irreversible plant wilting and death18,122. Within xylem for example, high densities of the pathogen increase expression of pathogenicity genes such as the hrp genes which control induction of disease development and the hypersensitive reaction48. The endophitic nature of R. solanacearum makes its management challenging. Chemical control for instance, apart from being potentially harmful to the environment, has been reported to be inefficient123. This can be explained by the fact that the bacterium is sheltered in xylem vessels of infected plants. Ways should be explored by targeting management strategies which can be applied via the xylem system.

Management challenges due to pathogen ability to survive without host: After destroying the host, R. solanacearum can survive in reservoir plants, soil or water environment27. Association of R. solanacearum with either reservoir plants or plant debris has been frequently suggested to promote survival of the pathogen in soil and water119. The pathogen has ability to persist in deadly environments, for example it can survive for up to one year in agricultural soil even after treatment with an herbicide up to two years after crop removal and withstand a four-year intercropping period27,124. Moderate changes in moisture do not negatively affect the pathogen population121. The bacterium can multiply in pure water in the absence of nutrients for up to four years125. The cells of R. solanacearum are capable of forming various forms as survival mechanisms in unfavorable environments such as in soil or water and the most frequently reported forms are as discussed in the following section.

Table 2:Race, biovars, distribution and host plants of R. solanacearum

Viable but non culturable (VBNC) form: R. solanacearum in soil can change and became VBNC within a month after exposure to low temperature of 4°C126 with cold-stressed cells progressively losing wilting capacity27,125. The VBNC state has also been reported to occur in infected plant where proportion of cells becoming VBNC increase after the plant’s extensive necrosis126.

Starvation-survival response: This is a physiological survival state in energy-deficient condition, in which bacterial cells starve to maintain a non-growing but culturable condition27,127. Starved R. solanacearum cells remain pathogenic in the water microcosms over four years119.

Phenotypic conversion (PC) type: This is a form that describes a morphological change of the R. solanacearum colonies from fluidal to afluidal form Popoola et al.128. PC-type which occurs in most R. solanacearum strains can be easily observed by prolonged culture on agar plates and when the bacterium is grown in a non-aerated liquid medium with glucose and organic source of nitrogen129. PC-type variants have selective advantage over the non PC-type. For example PC-types have higher motility for aerotaxis in oxidative stress environment27.

Biofilms forms: Some cells of R. solanacearum form biofilms on host xylem vessel walls to protect them from host defenses. Biofilms also filter nutrients from the flow of xylem fluid37. Different strains of R. solanacearum form biofilms on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) wells at the liquid air interface and on the surface of tomato seedlings130. Aerotaxis deficient mutants overproduce biofilms on abiotic surfaces which lead cells to avoid toxic oxygen levels at the liquid-air interface by forming protective thicker biofilms to facilitate survival27,37.

The survival strategies of R. solanacearum to live and cope with unsuitable conditions such as starvation response, being viable but non-culturable, physiological and morphological changes and aggregation may raise new concerns about the epidemiology of bacterial wilt disease in tomato farming systems. Although these infecting populations are not as high as those from wilted plants, the continuous flow would contribute to persistence of the pathogen in the environment. Knowledge on the ability of R. solanacearum to form different forms in different environmental conditions may have some positive implication towards development of its management strategies in farming system. When environmental condition is unsuitable (soil temperature for example), R. solanacearum become avirulent27, further research is required to investigate the potential of this knowledge in R. solanacearum management.

Management challenges due to pathogen ability to travel along waterways: The R. solanacearum can enter the surrounding soil, water or plants and be disseminated to uninfected environment through the moving water131. Plants which grow along waterways are mostly reported to facilitate R. solanacearum movement in waterways. The common examples include bittersweet nightshade, black nightshade and stinging nettle132. Roots and stems of bittersweed night shade for example can shelter R. solanacearum cells and continuously release them into the water system21. The use of contaminated water for field irrigation has been associated to most outbreaks of bacterial wilt disease119,124,125. Irrigation water could be treated prior to crop irrigation, but there still some challenges associated with this approach including exposure of the community to the health risks of exposure to chemicals, costly and contamination of water system. Use of management methods which are environmentally friendly like the use of plant extract could be the best approach to combat bacterial wilt disease in the farming system132. Because the pathogen stains vary with geographical location, there is a need to investigate effect of various plant species in the management of bacterial wilt disease.

CONCLUSION

This review article has discussed the challenges for the identification and management of bacterial wilt disease in tomato farming systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. It has exposed the reality that the pathogen is indeed challenging. Due to complexities in the identification and management there is urgent need to find ways for simple and quick identification methods. Use of biosensors which can detect low bacterial population densities as well as determining responsible strains and characterizing with molecular methods could a way forward. There is need also to explore sustainable pathogen management options including use of botanical plants.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was financially supported by the German Academic Exchange Service Program (DAAD) through the In-country/In-Region Scholarship Programme Tanzania 2016, grant number 91637162 and the project called Centre for Research, Agriculture Advancement, Teaching Excellence and Sustainability (CREATES) in Food and Nutrition Security of the Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST).

REFERENCES

  • FAO., 2005. Vegetable production in the world. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.


  • AVRDC., 2015. Annual report. The World Vegetable Center, Shanhua, Taiwan.


  • Jiang, G., Z. Wei, J. Xu, H. Chen and Y. Zhang et al., 2017. Bacterial wilt in China: History, current status and future perspectives. Front. Plant Sci., Vol. 8.
    CrossRef    


  • Ayandiji, A., O.R. Adeniyi and D. Omidiji, 2011. Determinant post harvest losses among tomato farmers in Imeko-Afon local government area of Ogun State, Nigeria. Global. J. Sci. Front. Res., 11: 23-27.
    Direct Link    


  • Maerere, A.P., K.P Sibuga, K.K Mwajombe, J. Kovach and M. Erbaugh, 2006. Baseline survey report of tomato production in Mvomero district-Morogoro region, Tanzania. Sokoine University of Agriculture Faculty of Agriculture, Morogoro, pp: 1-31.


  • Allen, A., J. Howard, M. Kondo, A. Jamison and T. Jayne et al., 2016. Agrifood youth employment and engagement study. Michigan State University Report. http://www.isp.msu.edu/files/4814/7249/7008/AgYees_Report_FINAL_web.pdf.


  • FAO., 2016. Global tomato production in 2014; Crops/World/2014. FAOSTAT. UN Food and Agriculture Organization, Statistics Division.


  • GoK., 2010. Economic review of agriculture: Central Planning and Project Monitoring Unit (CPPMU). Ministry of Agriculture, Government of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya, pp: 1-76.


  • Anang, B.T., Z.A. Zulkamain and S. Yusif, 2013. Production constraints and measures to enhance the competitiveness of the tomato industry in Wenchi municipal District of Ghana. Am. J. Exp. Agric., 3: 824-838.


  • James, B., C. Atcha-Ahowe, I. Godonou, H. Baimey, H. Goergen, R. Sikirou and M. Toko, 2010. Integrated pest management in vegetable production: A guide for extension workers in West Africa. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA), Ibadan, Nigeria, pp: 1-120.


  • Kim, S.G., O.S. Hur, N.Y. Ro, H.C. Ko, and J.H. Rhee et al., 2016. Evaluation of resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato genetic resources at seedling stage. Plant Pathol. J., 32: 58-64.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yang, L., R. Shuang, H. Fei, C. Yixia, W. Guoping and C. Kunzheng, 2016. Effects of biochar amendment on tomato bacterial wilt resistance and soil microbial amount and activity. Int. J. Agron., Vol. 2016.
    CrossRef    


  • Denny, T.P., 2006. Plant Pathogenic Ralstonia Species. In: Plant-Associated Bacteria, Gnanamanickam, S.S. (Ed.). Springer Publishing, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp: 573-644


  • Janse, J.D., 2012. Review on brown rot (Ralstonia solanacearum race 3, biovar 2, phylotype IIB) epidemiology and control in the Netherlands since 1995: A success story of integrated pest management. J. Plant Pathol., 94: 257-272.
    Direct Link    


  • EPPO., 2014. PQR database. European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, Paris, France. http://www.eppo.int/databases/pqr.htm.


  • Mansfield, J., S. Genin, S. Magori, V. Citovsky and M. Sriariyanum et al., 2012. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol., 13: 614-629.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Radhi, M.Z.A., M.B. Adam, H.M. Saud, M.N. Hamid, P.S.H. Tony and G.H. Tan, 2016. Efficacy of smart fertilizer for combating bacterial wilt disease in Solanum lycopersicum. J. Agric. Food Sci., 4: 137-143.
    Direct Link    


  • Kinyua, Z.M., S.A. Miller, C. Ashlina and S. Nagendra, 2014. Bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum: Standard operating procedure for use in diagnostic laboratories. Version: EA-SOP-RS1, May 2014.


  • Miller, S.A., D.B. Fen and L.H. Carrie, 2009. Plant disease diagnostic capabilities and networks. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 47: 15-38.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Aloyce, A., 2013. Detection of pathological isolates of stem rust from selected wheat fields and varietie’s reactions in Tanzania. M.Sc. Thesis, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.


  • Elphinstone, J.G., 2005. The Current Bacterial Wilt Situation: A Global Overview. In: Bacterial Wilt Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum species Complex, Allen, C., P. Prior and A.C. Hayward (Eds.). APS Press, St Paul, MN, USA., ISBN: 0890543291, pp: 9-28
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Terblanche, J. and D.A. de Villiers, 2013. The Suppression of Ralstonia by Marigolds solanacearum. In: Bacterial Wilt Disease: Molecular and Ecological Aspects, 1st Edn., Prior, P., C. Allen and J. Elphinstone (Eds.)., Springer Science and Business Media, Paris, pp: 325-331


  • Yuliar, Y.A. Nion and K. Toyota, 2015. Recent trends in control methods for bacterial wilt diseases caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbes Environ., 30: 1-11.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fegan, M. and P. Prior, 2005. How Complex is the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex? In: Bacterial Wilt Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex, Allen, C., P. Prior and A.C. Hayward (Eds.). American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, MN., USA., ISBN: 0890543291, pp: 449-461


  • Wang, X., Z. Wei, M. Li, X. Wang and A. Shan et al., 2017. Parasites and competitors suppress bacterial pathogen synergistically due to evolutionary trade-offs. Evolution, 71: 733-746.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Wang, L., K. Cai, Y. Chen and G. Wang, 2013. Silicon-mediated tomato resistance against Ralstonia solanacearum is associated with modification of soil microbial community structure and activity. Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 152: 275-283.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Alvarez, B., E.G. Biosca and M.M. Lopez, 2010. On the Life of Ralstonia solanacearum, A Destructive Bacterial Plant Pathogen. In: Current Research, Technology and Education Topics in Applied Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology, Mendez-Vilas, A. (Ed.). Formatex Research Center, Badajoz, Spain, ISBN-13: 978-84-614-6195-0, pp: 267-279
    Direct Link    


  • Nguyen, M.T. and S.L. Ranamukhaarachchi, 2010. Soil-borne antagonists for biological control of bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato and pepper. J. Plant Pathol., 92: 395-405.
    Direct Link    


  • Agrios, N.G., 2005. Plant Pathology. 5th Edn., Elsevier Academic Press, New York


  • Mbega, E.R., 2011. Detection, characterization and control of Xanthomonas spp., causal agents of bacterial leaf spot of tomato in Tanzania. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.


  • Agrios, G.N., 2008. Plant Pathology. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam, pp: 647-953


  • Jonathan, P.K., J.L. Frank and R.P. Dilip, 2014. The influence of temperature on bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum Smith), especially as it pertains to tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) from a historical perspective. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC., USA.


  • Singh, D., S. Sinha, D.K. Yadav and G. Chaudhary, 2014. Detection of Ralstonia solanacearum from asymptomatic tomato plants, irrigation water, and soil through non-selective enrichment medium with hrp gene-based bio-PCR. Curr. Microbiol., 69: 127-134.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Shamayeeta, S. and C. Sujata, 2016. Bacterial wilt and its management. Curr. Sci., 110: 1439-1445.
    Direct Link    


  • USDA., 2015. USDA-APHIS procedures for submitting domestically detected suspect Ralstonia solanacearum positives based on immunostrip testing. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/.


  • Denny, T.P. and A.C. Hayward, 2001. Gram Negative Bacteria. In: Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, Schaad, N.W., J.B. Jones and W. Chun (Eds.)., APS Press, St. Paul, Minnesota


  • Inoue, Y. and K. Nakaho, 2014. Sensitive quantitative detection of Ralstonia solanacearum in soil by the most probable number-polymerase chain reaction (MPN-PCR) method. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 98: 4169-4177.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Grover, A., S.K. Chakrabarti, W. Azmi, D. Sundar and S.M.P. Khurana, 2011. Identification of Ralstonia solanacearum using conserved genomic regions. Int. J. Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Res., 2: 23-30.
    Direct Link    


  • Mbega, E.R., J. Adriko, C.N. Mortensen, E.G. Wulff, O.S Lund and R.B. Mabagala, 2013. Improved sample preparation for PCR-based assays in the detection of Xanthomonads causing bacterial leaf spot of tomato. Br. Biotechnol. J., 3: 556-574.
    Direct Link    


  • Ndakidemi, P.A., 2007. Agronomic and economic potential of tughutu and minjingu phosphate rock as alternative phosphorus sources for bean growers. Pedosphere, 17: 732-738.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Boonham, N., R. Glover, J. Tomlinson and R. Mumford, 2008. Exploiting generic platform technologies for the detection and identification of plant pathogens. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 121: 355-363.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vincelli, P. and N. Tisserat, 2008. Nucleic acid-based pathogen detection in applied plant pathology. Plant Dis. J., 92: 660-669.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dannon, E.A. and K. Wydra, 2004. Interaction between silicon amendment, bacterial wilt development and phenotype of Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato genotypes. Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol., 64: 233-243.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hacisalihoglu, G., P. Ji, L.M. Longo, S. Olson and T.M. Momol, 2007. Bacterial wilt induced changes in nutrient distribution and biomass and the effect of acibenzolar-S-methyl on bacterial wilt in tomato. Crop Prot., 26: 978-982.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kawabata, N., H. Kishimoto, T. Abe, T. Ikawa, K. Yamanaka, H. Ikeuchi and C. Kakimoto, 2005. Control of tomato bacterial wilt without disinfection using a new functional polymer that captures microbial cells alive on the surface and is highly biodegradable. J. Biol. Sci. Biotechnol. Biochem., 69: 326-333.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Khanum, S.A., S. Shashikanth, S. Umesha and R. Kavitha, 2005. Synthesis and antimicrobial study of novel heterocyclic compounds from hydroxybenzophenones. Eur. J. Med. Chem., 40: 1156-1162.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kurabachew, H. and K. Wydra, 2014. Induction of systemic resistance and defense-related enzymes after elicitation of resistance by rhizobacteria and silicon application against Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Crop Prot., 57: 1-7.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Nakaune, M., K. Tsukazawa, H. Uga, E. Asamizu, S. Imanishi, C. Matsukura and H. Ezura, 2012. Low sodium chloride priming increases seedling vigor and stress tolerance to Ralstonia solanacearum in tomato. Plant Biotechnol., 29: 9-18.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Norman, D.J., J. Chen, J.M.F. Yuen, A. Mangravita-Novo, D. Byrne and L. Walsh, 2006. Control of bacterial wilt of geranium with phosphorous acid. Plant Dis., 90: 798-802.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pradhanang, P.M., P. Ji, M.T. Momol, S.M. Olson, J.L. Mayfield and J.B. Jones, 2005. Application of acibenzolar-S-methyl enhances host resistance in tomato against Ralstonia solanacearum. Plant Dis., 89: 989-993.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sharma, J.P. and S. Kumar, 2000. Management of Ralstonia wilt through soil disinfectant, mulch, lime and cakes in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Indian J. Agric. Sci., 70: 17-19.


  • Wydra, K. and E. Dannon, 2006. Silicon as inducer of resistance in tomato against Ralstonia solanacearum. Bull. OILB/SROP., 29: 91-96.
    Direct Link    


  • Yamasaki, M., S. Kusakari, K. Narita, K. Osamura and M. Nagai, 2006. Control of root rot disease of tomatoes by using Weak Acidic Electrolyzed Water (WAEW) in the hydroponic culture solution. J. Antibact. Antifungal Agents, 34: 543-549.


  • Alvarez, B., M.M. Lopez and E.G. Biosca, 2007. Influence of native microbiota on survival of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II in river water microcosms. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 73: 7210-7217.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chen, D., X. Liu, C. Li, W. Tian, Q. Shen and B. Shen, 2014. Isolation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens S20 and its application in control of eggplant bacterial wilt. J. Environ. Manage., 137: 120-127.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ding, C., Q. Shen, R. Zhang and W. Chen, 2013. Evaluation of rhizosphere bacteria and derived bio-organic fertilizers as potential biocontrol agents against bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum) of potato. Plant Soil, 366: 453-466.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hoa, L.H., N. Furuya, I. Yamamot, M. Takeshita and Y. Takanami, 2004. Identification of the endophytic bacterial isolates and their in vitro and in vivo antagonism against Ralstonia solanacearum. J. Agric., 49: 233-241.
    Direct Link    


  • Huang, J., Z. Wei, S. Tan, X. Mei, S. Yin, Q. Shen and Y. Xu, 2013. The rhizosphere soil of diseased tomato plants as a source for novel microorganisms to control bacterial wilt. Applied Soil Ecol., 72: 79-84.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hu, H.Q., X.S. Li and H. He, 2010. Characterization of an antimicrobial material from a newly isolated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens from mangrove for biocontrol of capsicum bacterial wilt. Biol. Control, 54: 359-365.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hyakumachi, M., M. Nishimura, T. Arakawa, S. Asano, S. Yoshida, S. Tsushim and H. Takahashi, 2013. Bacillus thuringiensis suppresses bacterial wilt disease caused by Ralstonia solanacearum with systemic induction of defense-related gene expression in tomato. Microbes Environ., 28: 128-134.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ji, D., Y. Yi, G.K. Kang, Y.H. Choi, P. Kim, N.I. Baek and Y. Kim, 2004. Identification of an antibacterial compound, benzylideneacetone, from Xenorhabdus nematophila against major plant-pathogenic bacteria. Microbiol. Lett., 239: 241-248.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Guo, J.H., H.Y. Qi, Y.H. Guo, H.L. Ge, L.Y Gong, L.X. Zhang and P.H. Sun, 2004. Biocontrol of tomato wilt by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. Biol. Control, 29: 66-72.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Li, B., R.R. Yu, Q.M. Tang, T. Su and X.L. Chen et al., 2011. Biofilm formation ability of Paenibacillus polymyxa and Paenibacillus macerans and their inhibitory effect against tomato bacterial wilt. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res., 5: 4260-4266.
    Direct Link    


  • Li, L., X. Feng, M. Tang, W. Hao, Y. Han, G. Zhang and S. Wan, 2014. Antibacterial activity of Lansiumamide B to tobacco bacterial wilt (Ralstonia solanacearum). Microbiol. Res., 169: 522-526.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ling, X., W. Wang, H.G. Wei, G.M. Shen and Y.G. Li, 2006. Effect of Paenibacillus polymyxa HY96-2 on bacterial wilt of tomato. China J. Biol. Cont., 22: 216-220.
    Direct Link    


  • Lin, W.C., C.F. Lu, J.W. Wu, M.L. Cheng and Y.M. Lin et al., 2004. Transgenic tomato plants expressing the Arabidopsis NPR1 gene display enhanced resistance to a spectrum of fungal and bacterial diseases. Transgenic Res., 13: 567-581.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Messiha, N.A.S., A.D. van Diepeningen, N.S. Farag, S.A. Abdallah, J.D. Janse, A.H.C. van Bruggen, 2007. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: A new potential biocontrol agent of Ralstonia solanacearum, causal agent of potato brown rot. Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 118: 211-225.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Momma, N., 2008. Biological soil disinfestation (BSD) of soilborne pathogens and its possible mechanisms. Jpn. J. Agric. Res., 47: 7-12.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Nion, Y.A. and K. Toyota, 2008. Suppression of bacterial wilt and Fusarium wilt by a Burkholderia nodosa strain isolated from kalimantan soils, Indonesia. Microbes Environ., 23: 134-141.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ramesh, R. and G.S. Phadke, 2012. Rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria for the suppression of eggplant wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Crop Prot., 37: 35-41.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Takahashi, H., K. Nakaho, T. Ishihara, S. Ando and T. Wada et al., 2014. Transcriptional profile of tomato roots exhibiting Bacillus thuringiensis-induced resistance to Ralstonia solanacearum. Plant Cell Rep., 33: 99-110.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tan, S., Y. Jiang, S. Song, J. Huang, N. Ling, Y. Xu and Q. Shen, 2013. Two Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains isolated using the competitive tomato root enrichment method and their effects on suppressing Ralstonia solanacearum and promoting tomato plant growth. Crop Prot., 43: 134-140.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Xue, Q.Y., G.C. Ding, S.M. Li, Y. Yang, C.Z. Lan, J.H. Guo and K. Smalla, 2013. Rhizocompetence and antagonistic activity towards genetically diverse Ralstonia solanacearum strains-An improved strategy for selecting biocontrol agents. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 97: 1361-1371.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yamada, T., T. Kawasaki, S. Nagata, A. Fujiwara, S. Usami and M. Fujie, 2007. New bacteriophages that infect the phytopathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbiology, 153: 2630-2639.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yang, W., Q. Xu, H.X. Liu, Y.P. Wang, Y.M. Wanga, H.T. Yang and J. H. Guo, 2012. Evaluation of biological control agents against Ralstonia wilt on ginger. Biol. Control, 62: 144-151.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yuan, S., L. Wang, K. Wu, J. Shi and M. Wang et al., 2014. Evaluation of Bacillus-fortified organic fertilizer for controlling tobacco bacterial wilt in greenhouse and field experiments. Applied Soil Ecol., 75: 86-94.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zhou, Y., Y.L. Choi, M. Sun and Z. Yu, 2008. Novel roles of Bacillus thuringiensis to control plant diseases. Applied Microbiol. Biotechnol., 80: 563-572.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zhou, T., D. Chen, C. Li, Q. Sun and L. Li et al., 2012. Isolation and characterization of Pseudomonas brassicacearum J12 as an antagonist against Ralstonia solanacearum and identification of its antimicrobial components. Microbiol. Res., 167: 388-394.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Zhu, H.H. and Q. Yao, 2004. Localized and systemic increase of phenols in tomato roots induced by Glomus versiforme inhibits Ralstonia solanacearum. J. Phytopathol., 152: 537-542.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Tahat, M.M., K. Sijam and R. Othman, 2012. The potential of endomycorrhizal fungi in controlling tomato bacterial wilt Ralstonia solanacearum under glasshouse conditions. Afr. J. Biotechnol., 11: 13085-13094.
    Direct Link    


  • Pacumbaba, R.P., C.A. Beyl and R.O. Pacumbaba Jr., 1999. Shiitake mycelial leachate suppresses growth of some bacterial species and symptoms of bacterial wilt of tomato and lima bean in vitro. Plant Dis., 83: 20-23.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hase, S., A. Shimizu, K. Nakaho, S. Takenaka and H. Takahashi, 2006. Induction of transient ethylene and reduction in severity of tomato bacterial wilt by Pythium oligandrum. Plant Pathol., 55: 537-543.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gomes, A.T., A.S. Junior, C. Seidel, E.F.A. Smania, N.K. Honda, F.M. Roese and R.M. Muzzi, 2003. Antibacterial activity of orsellinates. Braz. J. Microbiol., 34: 194-196.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Amorim, E.P.D., F.W.R. de Andrade, E.M. da Silva Morae, J.C. da Silva, R. da Silva Lima and E.F.P de Lemos, 2011. Antibacterial activity of essential oils and extracts on the development of Ralstonia solanacearum in banana seedlings. Rev. Bras. Frutic., 33: 392-398.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Arthy, J.R., E.B. Akiew, J.A. Kirkegaard and P.R. Trevorrow, 2005. Using Brassica spp. as Biofumigants to Reduce the Population of Ralstonia solanacearum. In: Bacterial Wilt Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex, Allen, C., P. Prior and A.C. Hayward (Eds.)., American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, MN., pp: 159-165


  • Acharya, S. and R.C. Srivastava, 2009. Bactericidal properties of the leaf extracts of Psidium guajava and Psidium guineense against Ralstonia solanacearum by two analytical methods. Vegetos, 22: 33-37.


  • Almeida, H.O., E.C. Mattos, M.O. Barbosa, F.R. Teixeira and R.D.M. Magalhaes et al., 2007. Peptide fraction inhibiting plant pathogen growth predominated in cell wall extracts from young plants or in soluble cell fraction from expanded leaves from eggplants. J. Phytopathol., 155: 735-737.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cardoso, S.C., A.C.F. Soares, A.D.S. Brito, F.F. Laranjeira, C.A.S. Ledo and A.P. dos Santos, 2006. Control of tomato bacterial wilt through the incorporation of aerial part of pigeon pea and crotalaria to soil. J. Phytopathol., 32: 27-33.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ji, P., M.T. Momol, S.M. Olson, P.M. Pradhanang and J.B. Jones, 2005. Evaluation of thymol as biofumigant for control of bacterial wilt of tomato under field conditions. Plant Dis., 89: 497-500.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Matsushita, Y., Y.H. Hwang, K. Sugamoto and T. Matsui, 2006. Antimicrobial activity of heartwood components of sugi (Cryptomeria japonica) against several fungi and bacteria. J. Wood Sci., 52: 552-556.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ooshiro, A., K. Takaesu, M. Natsume, S. Taba, K. Nasu, M. Uehara and Y. Muramoto, 2004. Identification and use of a wild plant with antimicrobial activity against Ralstonia solanacearum, the cause of bacterial wilt of potato. Weed Biol. Manage., 4: 187-194.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ordonez, R.M., A.A.L. Ordonez, J.E. Sayago, M.I.N. Moreno and M.I. Isla, 2006. Antimicrobial activity of glycosidase inhibitory protein isolated from Cyphomandra betacea Sendt. fruit. Peptides, 27: 1187-1191.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Olivier, A.R., Y. Uda, S.W. Bang, H. Honjo, M. Fukami and R. Fukui, 2006. Dried residues of specific cruciferous plants incorporated into soil can suppress the growth of Ralstonia solanacearum, independently of glucosinolate content of the residues. Microbes Environ., 21: 216-226.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hwang, Y.H., Y.I. Matsushita, K. Sugamoto and T. Matsui, 2005. Antimicrobial effect of the wood vinegar from Cryptomeria japonica sapwood on plant pathogenic microorganisms. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 15: 1106-1109.
    Direct Link    


  • Paret, M.L, S.K. Sharma and A.M. Alvarez, 2012. Characterization of biofumigated Ralstonia solanacearum cells using micro-raman spectroscopy and electron microscopy. Phytopathology, 102: 105-113.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pontes, N.DC., A.Z. Kronka, M.F.H. Morases, A.S. Nascimento and M.F. Fujinawa, 2011. Incorporation of neem leaves into soil to control bacterial wilt of tomato. J. Plant Pathol., 93: 741-744.
    Direct Link    


  • Posas, M.B. and K. Toyota, 2010. Mechanism of tomato bacterial wilt suppression in soil amended with lysine. Microbes Environ., 25: 83-94.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Shimpi, S.R., L.S. Chaudhari, S.M. Bharambe, A.T. Kharce, K.P. Patil, R.S. Bendre and P.P Mahulikar, 2005. Evaluation of antimicrobial activity of organic extract of leaves of Aristolochia bracteata. Pesticide Rese. J., 17: 16-18.
    Direct Link    


  • Texeira, F.R., M.C.O.P. Lima, H.O. Almeida, R.S. Romeiro and D.J.H. Silva et al., 2006. Bioprospection of cationic and anionic antimicrobial peptides from bell pepper leaves for inhibition of Ralstonia solanacearum and Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis growth. J. Phytopathol., 154: 418-421.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yu, J.Q., 1999. Allelopathic suppression of Pseudomonas solanacearum infection of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) in a tomato-chinese chive (Allium tuberosum) intercropping system. J. Chem. Ecol., 25: 2409-2417.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yuan, G.Q., Q.Q. Li, J. Qin, Y. F. Ye and W. Lin, 2012. Isolation of methyl gallate from Toxicodendron sylvestre and its effect on tomato bacterial wilt. Plant Dis., 91: 1143-1147.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gorissen, A., L.S. van Overbeek and J.D. van Elsas, 2004. Pig slurry reduces the survival of Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2 in soil. Can. J. Microbiol., 50: 587-593.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Islam, T.M.D. and K. Toyota, 2004. Effect of moisture conditions and pre-incubation at low temperature on bacterial wilt of tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum. Microbes Environ., 19: 244-247.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Janvier, C., F. Villeneuve, C. Alabouvette, V. Edel-Hermann, T. Mateille and C. Steinberg, 2007. Soil health through soil disease suppression: Which strategy from descriptors to indicators? Soil Biol. Biochem., 39: 1-23.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hassan, M.A.E. and K.A.M. Abo-Elyousr, 2013. Activation of tomato plant defence responses against bacterial wilt caused by Ralstonia solanacearum using DL-3-aminobutyric acid (BABA). Eur. J. Plant Pathol., 136: 145-157.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Igawa, T., M. Ide, Y.A. Nion, K. Toyota, T. Kuroda and K. Masuda, 2008. Effect of the addition of lysine and biocontrol agents to hydroponic culture using a pumice medium on bacterial wilt of tomato. Soil Microbiol., 62: 9-14.


  • Posas, M.B., K. Toyota and T.M.D. Islam, 2007. Inhibition of bacterial wilt of tomato caused by Ralstonia solanacearum by sugars and amino acids. Microbes Environ., 22: 290-296.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Boshou, L., 2005. A Broad Review and Perspective on Breeding for Resistance to Bacterial Wilt. In: Bacterial Wilt Disease and the Ralstonia Solanacearum Species Complex. Allen, C., P. Prior and A.C. Hayward (Eds.). American Phytopathological Society, APS Press, St. Paul, MN., pp: 225-238


  • Dahal, D., A. Pich, H.P. Braun and K. Wydra, 2010. Analysis of cell wall proteins regulated in stem of susceptible and resistant tomato species after inoculation with Ralstonia solanacearum: A proteomic approach. Plant Mol. Biol., 73: 643-658.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Fock, I., C. Collonnier, A. Purwito, J. Luisetti and V. Souvannavong et al., 2000. Resistance to bacterial wilt in somatic hybrids between Solanum tuberosum and Solanum phureja. Plant Sci., 160: 165-176.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Denny, T.P., S.M. Brumbley, B.F. Carney, S.J. Clough and M.A Schell, 1994. Phenotype Conversion of Pseudomonas solanacearum: Its Molecular Basis and Potential Function. In: Bacterial Wilt: The Disease and its Causative Agent, Pseudomonas solanacearum, Hayward, A.C. and G.L. Hartman (Eds.)., CAB International, Wallingford, UK., pp: 137


  • Dasgupta, S., C. Meisner, D. Wheeler, K. Xuyen and N.T. Lam, 2007. Pesticide poisoning of farm workers-implications of blood test results from Vietnam. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health, 210: 121-132.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Buddenhagen, I. and A. Kelman, 1964. Biological and physiological aspects of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 2: 203-230.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Remenant, B., B. Coupat-Goutaland, A. Guidot, G. Cellier and E. Wicker et al., 2010. Genomes of three tomato pathogens within the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex reveal significant evolutionary divergence. BMC Genomics, Vol. 11.
    CrossRef    


  • Prior, P., F. Ailloud, B.L. Dalsing, B. Remenant, B. Sanchez and C. Allen, 2016. Genomic and proteomic evidence supporting the division of the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum into three species. BMC Genom., Vol. 17.
    CrossRef    


  • USDA., 2014. New pest response guidelines: Ralstonia solanacearum race 3 biovar 2 geranium southern wilt. Pest Detection and Management Programs, APHIS.


  • Alvarez, B., M.M. Lopez and E.G. Biosca, 2008. Survival strategies and pathogenicity of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II subjected to prolonged starvation in environmental water microcosms. Microbiology, 154: 3590-3598.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Yao, J. and C. Allen, 2007. The plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum needs aerotaxis for normal biofilm formation and interactions with its tomato host. J. Bacteriol., 189: 6415-6424.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Genin, S., 2010. Molecular traits controlling host range and adaptation to plants in Ralstonia solanacearum. New Phytol., 187: 920-928.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hiroki, N., M. Taro, S. Naoto, M. Hiromi and M. Naotaka, 2016. Biological control of the bacterial wilt of the tomato ‘Micro-Tom’ by phenotypic conversion mutants of Ralstonia solanacearum. Environ. Control Biol., 54: 139-145.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Williams, S.J., K.H. Sohn, L. Wan, M. Bernoux, P.F. Sarris and C. Segonzac, 2014. Structural basis for assembly and function of a heterodimeric plant immune receptor. Science, 44: 299-303.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Van Elsas, J.D., L.S. van Overbeek, M.J. Bailey, J. Schonfeld and K. Smalla, 2005. Fate of Ralstonia solanacearum Biovar 2 as Affected By Conditions and Soil Treatments in Temperate Climate Zones. In: Bacterial Wilt Disease and the Ralstonia solanacearum Species Complex, Allen C., P. Prior and A.C. Hayward (Eds.). APS Press, St. Paul, MN., USA., pp: 39-49


  • Caruso, P., J.L. Palomo, E. Bertolini, B. Alvarez, M.M. Lopez and E.G. Biosca, 2005. Seasonal variation of Ralstonia solanacearum biovar 2 populations in a Spanish river: Recovery of stressed cells at low temperatures. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 71: 140-148.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hong, J., P., M.T. Ji, J.B. Momol, S.M. Jones, P. Olson and K. Pradhanang, 2005. Ralstonia solanacearum detection in tomato irrigation ponds and weeds. Acta Hortic., 695: 309-312.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Grey, B.E. and T.R. Steck, 2001. The viable but nonculturable state of Ralstonia solanacearum may be involved in long-term survival and plant infection. Applied Environ. Microbiol., 67: 3866-3872.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Heim, S., M.D.M. Lleo, B. Bonato, C.A. Guzman and P. Canepari, 2002. The viable but nonculturable state and starvation are different stress responses of Enterococcus faecalis, as determined by proteome analysis. J. Bacteriol., 184: 6739-6745.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Brumbley, S.M. and T.P. Denny, 1990. Cloning of wild-type Pseudomonas solanacearum phcA, a gene that when mutated alters expression of multiple traits that contribute to virulence. J. Bacteriol., 172: 5677-5685.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Popoola, A.R., S.A. Ganiyu, O.A. Enikuomehin, J.G. Bodunde, O.B. Adedibu, H.A. Durosomo, and O.A. Karunwi, 2015. Isolation and characterization of Ralstonia solanacearum causing bacterial wilt of tomato in Nigeria. Niger. J. Biotechnol., 29: 1-10.
    Direct Link    


  • Kang, Y.W., H.L. Liu, S. Genin, M.A. Schell and T.P. Denny, 2002. Ralstonia solanacearum requires type 4 pili to adhere to multiple surfaces and for natural transformation and virulence. Mol. Microbiol., 46: 427-437.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Coupat, B., F. Chaumeille-Dole, S. Fall, P. Prior, P. Simonet, X. Nesme and F. Bertolla, 2008. Natural transformation in the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex: number and size of DNA that can be transferred. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 66: 14-24.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hayward, A.C., 1991. Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 29: 65-87.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mbega, E.R., C.N. Mortensen, R.B. Mabagala and E.G. Wulff, 2012. The effect of plant extracts as seed treatments to control bacterial leaf spot of tomato in Tanzania. J. Gen. Plant Pathol., 78: 277-286.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved