HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2013 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 14 | Page No.: 661-670
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.661.670
Effects of Persistent Insecticides on Beneficial Soil Arthropod in Conventional Fields Compared to Organic Fields, Puducherry
Padmavathy Anbarashan and Poyyamoli Gopalswamy

Abstract: The usage of synthetic fertilizers/insecticides in conventional farming has dramatically increased over the past decades. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of bio-pesticides and insecticides/pesticides on selected beneficial non targeted arthropods. Orders Collembola, Arachinida/Opiliones, Oribatida and Coleoptera were the main groups of arthropods found in the organic fields and Coleoptera, Oribatida, Gamasida and Collembola in conventional fields. Pesticides/insecticides had a significant effect on non-targeted arthropods order- Collembola, Arachinida/Opiliones, Hymenoptera and Thysonoptera were suppressed after pesticides/insecticides spraying. Bio-insecticides in organic fields had a non-significant effect on non targeted species and they started to increase in abundance after 7 days of spraying, whereas insecticide treatment in conventional fields had a significant long-term effect on non targeted arthropods and short term effect on pests/insects, it started to increase after 21 days of the spraying. These results indicate that insecticide treatment kept non targeted arthropods at low abundance. In conclusion, organic farming does not significantly affected the beneficial-non targeted arthropods biodiversity, whereas preventive insecticide application in conventional fields had significant negative effects on beneficial non targeted arthropods. Therefore, conventional farmers should restrict insecticide applications, unless pest densities reach the thresholds and more desirably can switch to organic farming practices.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Padmavathy Anbarashan and Poyyamoli Gopalswamy, 2013. Effects of Persistent Insecticides on Beneficial Soil Arthropod in Conventional Fields Compared to Organic Fields, Puducherry. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 16: 661-670.

Keywords: arthropods, pesticides/insecticides, non-targeted species, conventional farming and Organic farming

INTRODUCTION

In the last century, agricultural intensification resulted in significant biodiversity loss in agro-ecosystems (Robertson and Swinton, 2005; OECD, 2008; Nair, 2008; Krauss et al., 2011). Biodiversity and ecosystem services might be protected along with agro-ecosystems, where farmers get subsidies, partly to produce ecological benefits (Kleijn et al., 2001). Important agro-ecological concept in organic farming systems is the avoidance of chemical fertilization and pesticide application, whereas in conventional farming systems it is common (Krauss et al., 2011; Pandey and Singh, 2012). There is a considerable concern about decline in biodiversity that would influence the delivery of various ecosystem services (Hole et al., 2005; Hooper et al., 2005; FIBL, 2012).

In agricultural intensification, the most affected/ecosystem services at severe risk are biological pest control (Tscharntke et al., 2005, Geiger et al., 2010), crop pollination (Biesmeijer et al., 2006; MEA, 2005; Zhang et al., 2007) and soil fertility maintenance (Hole et al., 2005; Hansen et al., 2006; Goh, 2011; Pandey and Singh, 2012). Organic farming might decrease the biomass of crop by 25% but increases the diversity of most functional group species (Bengtsson et al., 2005; Letourneau and Bothwell, 2008; Kleijn et al., 2006). Tonhasca (1993) and Carcamo et al. (1995) reported that response of different arthropods to organic cultivation systems has diverse consequences for pest management, focusing only on more relevant species which improve the productive capacity in such systems.

Mites, spring tails and ants are some important arthropods used to assess environmental impacts (Joy and Chakravorty, 1991; Peck et al., 1998; Badji et al., 2007). Studies on non target impacts of pesticides on spring tails are carried out by Frampton (1994, 1997) and in ants by Samways (1981) and Peck et al. (1998), Perfecto (1990), Michereff-Filho et al. (2004). Moore et al. (1984) and Minor et al. (2004) reported that Oribatida and Gamasida mites have been used to assess the changes resulting from human activity.

Application of systematic insecticides in conventional fields is a common practice (Geiger et al., 2010). Studies on comparison of death of non targeted species among organic and conventional fields with different crops is still lacking, hence this study was conducted to assess the effects of pesticides (causing loss of beneficial arthropods) in conventional fields and a comparison was made along with organic fields.

Hymenoptera are important in soil nutrient cycling/soil organic matter decomposition; Spiders (Araneae) and Opiliones (harvestmans) are useful in controlling aphid numbers, whereas Isopoda, Collembola and certain families of Coleoptera (Carabidae, Scarabidae) that include saprophagous organisms, contribute to decomposition of soil organic matter influencing the amount of living and dead organic material and nutrient transfers in terrestrial ecosystems. The present study was focused on the pesticides/insecticides effects on the assemblage of such beneficial arthropods are selected for the study. All these families were easily collected using pitfall traps/visual searching methods and species belonging to these families were abundant in most of the habitat types under the investigation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Experimental site and design: Puducherry is located on the Coramandal coast 11°52' N, 79° 45' E and 11°59' N and between 79°52' E covers an area of 480 sq km. The study area experiences mean annual temperature of 30.0°C and mean annual rainfall about 1311-1172 mm. The mean number of annual rainy days is 55, the mean monthly temperature ranges from 21.3-30.2°C. The climate is tropical dissymmetric with the bulk of the rainfall during northeast monsoon October-December (Indian Meteorological Department-Chennai).

Fig. 1: Location of the study area

Table 1: Fertilizer/manures/insecticides/bio-pesticides application in organic and conventional fields

The present study is based on the field work carried out by us at Kuruvinatham and Soriankuppam villages (Fig. 1), 24 kms South on the way to Cuddalore from the Puducherry main town. These villages come under Bahour commune.

Study sites are located on the river bank/basin of Ponnaiyar River, has a clayey soil texture with major proportion of clay (55%) and fine sand (35.5%), that are more suitable and convenient (soil texture) for groundnut and vegetable cultivation. Conventional and Organic agriculture fields were chosen on the basis of the homogeneity of inherent soil characteristics. Two sets of samples were taken in this study -15 organic fields (with a history of organic farming practice for the last 6 years) and 15 conventional/Green Revolution Agriculture fields (with a history of inorganic farming practice for more than 6 years) and they had a uniform crop sequence pattern as Paddy/Groundnut/Ladys finger (per year) were selected. The fields sizes varied between <1 to >5 ha. Both organic and conventional farms were mostly rain fed and in absences of rainy days water was distributed by canals, at annual rates from 280 to 620 mm, i.e. mean daily water input for paddy is 11.3-14.4 mm day-1 and for others 9-11.5 mm day-1.

Characteristics: A comprehensive description of the fertilizers application practices adopted during the survey are described in Table 1. According to the procedures utilized by conventional local growers, a blend of pesticides/insecticides was sprayed once every month (depending upon the abundance of pests/insects) after planting. Monocrotophos chemical at 1:4 with water applied at 25/35/45 days after sowing and Karate chemical at 1:3 ratios with water applied at 55/70 days after sowing. Endosulphon at 1:4 with water applied at 25/35/45 days after sowing. These are the predominant insecticides used in paddy, lady’s finger and groundnut at the local level.

As in case of organic farming, a mixture of fermented extracts of Caltrops leaf, Adhatoda vasica leaf, Ipomoea carnea leaf, Vitex negundo and Morinda correia are used as Bio-pesticides to control diseases and pests in the organic system. These applications were performed according to the program adopted by organic producers in the region and sprayed once every month (depending upon the abundance of pests/insects) after planting.

Sampling was carried out by pitfall traps as suggested by Schmidt et al. (2006) and visual searching methods by Latif et al. (2009). In each field 10 pitfall traps were placed in three or four parallel lines (least distance between single traps in the line: 5 m; least distance between lines: 5 m) close to the plants. Pitfall traps were left in the fields for 48 h and then specimens were collected, identified (to family level) and preserved. Samples were taken 20, 13, 6 and 1 days before spraying and 1, 6, 13, 20 and 25 days after insecticides spraying. Arthropod families/order with only one occurrence was removed from analysis as suggested by Boutin et al. (2009) SPSS 16 and Biodiversity-R was used for ANOVA.

Weed control was carried out by mechanical weeding and manually on post-planting in the conventional system and in the organic system weeds are encouraged till they are under threshold level and its is removed mechanically/manually, when it crosses the threshold level.

RESULTS

The density and the numbers of arthropods were higher (before and after insecticides/pesticides application) in the organic cropping system, reflecting on Shannon diversity indices, which were higher in the organic system (H’ 2.5-3.5) than conventional fields H’ 0.5-1.5) throughout the study (Fig. 2). Families belonging to the orders Homoptera, Pscopotera, Poudurida, Scheloribatida etc., that appeared with less frequent/less number of individuals were neglected from further analyses. Families belonging to the orders Collembola (Entomobridae/Isotomidae/Sminthuridae) Arachinida (Araneae/Oliliones), Oribatida (Oribatuloidae/Oribatida), Coleoptera (Carabidae/Scarabidae/Cicadellidae), Hymnoptera (Myrimicinae, Formicidae, Ecitoninae, Ponerinae) and Thysonoptera are the main groups of arthropods found in the organic soil during the study period, as in case of conventional farming Oribatida (Oribatuloidae/Brachichythonidadae/Galummidae), Gamasida (Rhodacaridae/Uropodidae/Ixodidae) Collembola (Symphyploena/Brachysromellidae/Ioduridae) and Coleoptera (Aphididae/Carabidae/Reduviidae/ Noctuidae-pests) are the main groups of arthropods (Table 2-4).

Fig. 2: A comparison of arthropod diversity index between organic and conventional fields

Table 2: An overall abundance/harvest (±standard error) of arthropods collected from conventional and organic paddy fields, without and with insecticides spraying

Table 3: An overall abundance/harvest (±standard error) of arthropods collected from conventional and organic groundnut fields ha-1, with and without insecticides spraying

Table 4: An overall abundance/harvest (±standard error) of arthropods collected from conventional and organic ladys finger fields, with and without insecticides spraying

These orders did show an apparent trend based on their overall abundance and they were also subjected to individual Repeated Measures ANOVA allowing the interpretation of the within subject factor for each one of them. All interactions between treatments and time (before and after insecticide spraying) were tested. Significant difference between treatments was found among the three crops.

There was a significant effect of the cultivation systems on the following orders Collembola (p = 0.103), Oribatida (p = 0.04) and Coleoptera (p = 0.003) in paddy fields (Table 1), in the groundnut fields (Table 2) Collembola (p = 0.020), Gamasida (p = 0.05) and Hymnoptera (p = 0.04) showed a significant effect in the abundance and in case of ladys finger fields (Table 3) Collembola (p = 0.12), Arachinida -Araneae and Opiliones (p = 0.034; p = 0.043) showed a significant effect in the abundance. This effect was regardless of time, orders-Collembola, Arachinida-Araneae/Opiliones, Hymnoptera and Thysonoptera has the largest populations of arthropods and the number of individuals were twofold higher (before/after insecticides/pesticides spraying) in the organic cropping system.

DISCUSSION

In conventional fields, orders- Oribatida, Gamasida and Coleoptera had the largest populations of arthropods; they showed higher number of individuals and 25% times higher (before insecticides/pesticides spraying) and remained 45% higher in the conventional cropping system (after insecticides/pesticides spraying) than in the organic fields. This results are similar to the results of several earlier workers (Cockfield and Potter, 1983; Stark, 1992; Weibull et al., 2000; 2003; Michereff-Filho et al., 2004; Boutin et al., 2009; Thomas et al., 2011) and found that these species are tolerant to insecticides and used as bio indicators of environmental stress; their presence in higher abundance in conventional fields determines such fields are under severe environmental stress like urbanization, crop and forest management, overgrazing and soil pollution.

Repeated measures ANOVA indicated a significant interaction between cultivation systems and sampling data for Collembola-(Entomobridae/Isotomidae/ Sminthuridae) (p = 0.00; p = 0.003; p = 0.04), Arachinida- Araneae/Opiliones (p = 0.010; p = 0.103; p = 0.14), Hymnoptera (Myrimicinae, Formicidae) (p = 0.020; p = 0.013; p = 0.004) and Thysonoptera (p = 0.203, p = 0.110; p = 0.214) these results indicate a significant effect of the cultivation systems with spring tails, spiders/harvestmans and ants, through time. There is a drastic decline/decrease from day 2 to 20 in the abundance on the non-targeted species after pesticides/insecticides spraying in conventional fields among the entire three crop fields, the abundance was slightly decreased (day 2) and raised after 7 days of bio-pesticides spraying in organic fields (Fig. 2). The pests/aphids population trend to increase in conventional fields after 20 day of insecticides spraying, necessitating spraying pesticides/insecticides again, as in case of organic fields, the bio-pesticides brings the insects/pests population under threshold level and it is mentioned throughout by biological pest control agents like spiders/harvestmans, mites, ants, true bugs, centipedes and flies.

These results agree with that of several earlier workers who reported that semi-natural agricultural systems in organic fields with diverse plants provide food source for several beneficial arthropods and it is a key determinant for the arthropods community, with a positive effect on the biodiversity (Oehl et al., 2004; Boutin et al., 2009; Ponce et al., 2011; Krauss et al., 2011). The weeds in organic fields serve as a habit and habitat for several predatory bugs and are present in greater density and diversity in organic fields (Fukuda et al., 2011; Nascimbene et al., 2012); whereas in conventional fields weeds are removed mechanically/manually/by using herbicides (rarely). This intern affects various beneficial insect populations (FIBL, 2012). Insecticides application and weed removal in conventional croplands usually have a stronger negative impact on arthropods and also reduce biological pest control potentials (Paoletti and Pimentel, 1992; Hendrickx et al., 2007; Rundlof et al., 2008; Boutin et al., 2009); Geiger et al., 2010; Thomas et al., 2011; Fukuda et al., 2011; Nascimbene et al., 2012).

In summary, the results of the present study confirm that pesticides/insecticides spraying in conventional systems results in significant (p value ranged in and between p = 0.00-, p = 0.103) effect on non-targeted arthropods order-Collembola, Arachinida-Araneae/Opiliones, Hymenoptera and Thysonoptera they were significantly suppressed after pesticides/insecticides spraying. These results are in agreement with that of El Titi and Ipach (1989), Wiggins and Curl (1979), Curl et al. (1985a, b), Rickerl et al. (1989), Lartey et al. (1994), Bettiol et al. (2002), Boutin et al. (2009) and Thomas et al. (2011), who concluded that collembolans can be found in large population densities in organic fields than in conventional fields, due to enhanced food source/reduced suppression in organic soils. They play important role in arthropod food webs, decomposition, soil nutrient dynamics and suppressing plant pathogens. Hunting spiders/Opiliones/ants play a significant role in biological pest control and serves as important bio-control agents (Batary et al., 2010, 2012; Dahms et al., 2010). Organic management enhanced the species richness of spiders/opiliones/ants, whereas conventional farming portrayed the opposite trend as it is reported by Letourneau and van Bruggen (2006), Letourneau and Bothwell (2008) and Dahms et al. (2010).

CONCLUSION

From this study, it may be concluded organic farming enhances arthropod groups that provide ecosystem services with benefits for farmers due to better top to down control of pest species and maintenance of soil fertility. The insecticide application in conventional fields had significant direct costs in terms of material and labour with no long term benefit for aphid control and negative effects on natural beneficial arthropods. It is therefore concluded that the application of insecticides in conventional fields increases direct management costs for farmers and indirectly decreases biological pest control effectively, thus results reduced ecosystem services.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

I record my sincere thanks for the Head and Staffs of NGO-Kalanjiyam, CERD-Puducherry Science Forum, Bahour for their kind help in the field/lab work and species identification. To the Directorate of Economics and Statistics and to the Department of Agriculture, Puducherry Government and their Head/employees who helped me in my data collections throughout the study ant to the farming community of Kuruvinatham and Soriyankuppam for sharing their farming experiences and allowed for my field work. Grateful to Pondicherry university/University Grants commission for providing research fellowship (to one of us-AP) and laboratory facilities.

REFERENCES

  • Badji, C.A., R.N.C. Guedes, A.A. Silva, A.S. Correa, M.E.L.R. Queiroz and M. Michereff-Filho, 2007. Non-target impact of deltamethrin on soil arthropods of maize fields under conventional and no-tillage cultivation. J. Appl. Entomol., 131: 50-58.
    CrossRef    


  • Batary, P., A. Baldi, M. Sarospataki, F. Kohler and J. Verhulst et al., 2010. Effect of conservation management on bees and insect-pollinated grassland plant communities in three European countries. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 136: 35-39.
    CrossRef    


  • Batary, P., A. Holzschuha, K.M. Orcic, F. Samud and T. Tscharntkea, 2012. Responses of plant, insect and spider biodiversity to local and landscape scale management intensity in cereal crops and grasslands. Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 146: 130-136.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bengtsson, J., J. Ahnstrom and A.C. Weibull, 2005. The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: A meta-analysis. J. Applied Ecol., 42: 261-269.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bettiol, W., R. Ghini, J.A.H. Galvao, M.A.V. Ligo and J.L.D.C. Mineiro, 2002. Soil organisms in organic and conventional cropping systems. Sci. Agric., 59: 565-572.
    CrossRef    


  • Biesmeijer, J.C., S.P.M. Roberts, M. Reemer, R. Ohlemuller and M. Edwards et al., 2006. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science, 313: 351-354.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Boutin, C., P.A. Martin and A. Baril, 2009. Arthropod diversity as affected by agricultural management (organic and conventional farming), plant species and landscape context. Ecosci., 16: 492-501.
    CrossRef    


  • Carcamo, H.A., J.K. Niemala and J.R. Spence, 1995. Farming and ground beetles: Effects of agronomic practice on populations and community structure. Can. Entomol., 127: 123-140.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Cockfield, S.D. and D.A. Potter, 1983. Short-term effects of insecticidal applications on predaceous arthropods and oribatid mites in Kentucky bluegrass turf. Environ. Entomol., 12: 1260-1264.
    Direct Link    


  • Curl, E.A., R.T. Gudauskas, J.D. Harper and C.M. Peterson, 1985. Effects of Soil Insects on Populatons and Germination of Fungal Propagules. In: Ecology and Management of Soil Borne Plant Pathogens, Parker, C.A., A.D. Rovira, K.J. Moore and P.T.W. Wong (Eds.). American Phytopathological Society, Paul, USA., pp: 20-23


  • Curl, E.A., J.D. Harper, C.M. Peterson and R.T. Gudauskas, 1985. Relationships of Mycophagous collembola and Rhizoctonia solani populations in biocontrol. Phytopathology, 75: 1360-1360.


  • Dahms, H., S. Mayr, K. Birkhofer, M. Chauvat, E. Melnichnova, V. Wolters and J. Dauber, 2010. Contrasting diversity patterns of epigeic arthropods between grasslands of high and low agronomic potential. Basic Applied Ecol., 11: 6-14.
    CrossRef    


  • El Titi, A. and U. Ipach, 1989. Soil fauna in sustainable agriculture: Results of na integrated farming system at Lautenbach. F.R.G. Agric. Ecosys. Environ., 27: 561-572.


  • FIBl, 2012. Organic agriculture promotes biodiversity. http://www.fibl.org/en/fibl/themes/biodiversity.html.


  • Frampton, G.K., 1997. The potential of Collembola as indicators of pesticide usage: Evidence and methods from the UK arable ecosystem. Pedobiologia, 41: 179-184.


  • Frampton, G.K., 1994. Sampling to detect the effect of pesticides on epigeal Collembola (springtails). Asp. Applied Biol., 37: 121-130.
    Direct Link    


  • Fukuda, Y., H. Moller and B. Burns, 2011. Effects of organic farming, fencing and vegetation origin on spiders and beetles within shelterbelts on dairy farms. New Zealand J. Agric. Res., 54: 155-176.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Geiger, F., J. Bengtsson, F. Berendse, W.W. Weisser and M. Emmerson et al., 2010. Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland. Basic Applied Ecol., 11: 97-105.
    CrossRef    


  • Goh, K.M., 2011. Greater mitigation of climate change by organic than conventional agriculture: A review. Biol. Agric. Hortic.: Int. J. Sustainable Prod. Syst., 27: 205-229.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hansen, L., E. Noe and K. Hojring, 2006. Nature and nature values in organic agriculture. An analysis of contested concepts and value among different actors in organic farming. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics, 19: 147-168.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hendrickx, F., J.P. Maelfait, W. van Wingerden, O. Schweiger and M. Speelmans et al., 2007. How landscape structure, land-use intensity and habitat diversity affect components of total arthropod diversity in agricultural landscapes. J. Applied Ecol., 44: 340-351.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hole, D.G., A.J. Perkins, J.D. Wilson, I.H. Alexander, P.V. Grice and A.D. Evans, 2005. Does organic farming benefit biodiversity. Biol. Conserv., 122: 113-130.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Hooper, D.U., F.S. Chapin III, J.J. Ewel, A. Hector and P. Inchausti et al., 2005. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: A consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr., 75: 3-35.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kleijn, D., F. Berendse, R. Smit and N. Gilissen, 2001. Agrienvironment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature, 413: 723-725.
    Direct Link    


  • Kleijn, D., R.A. Baquero, Y. Clough, M. Diaz and J. de Esteban et al., 2006. Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. Ecol. Lett., 9: 243-254.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Krauss, J., I. Gallenberger and I. Steffan-Dewenter, 2011. Decreased functional diversity and biological pest control in conventional compared to organic crop fields. PLoS One, Vol. 6
    CrossRef    


  • Lartey, R.T., E.A. Curl and C.M. Peterson, 1994. Interactions of mycophagous Collembola and biological control fungi in the suppression of Rhizoctonia solani. Soil Biol. Biochem., 26: 81-88.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Latif, M.A., M.M. Rahman, M.R. Islam and M.M. Nuruddin, 2009. Survey of arthropod biodiversity in the brinjal field. J. Entomol., 6: 28-34.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Letourneau, D.K. and S.G. Bothwell, 2008. Comparison of organic and conventional farms: Challenging ecologists to make biodiversity functional. Front. Ecol. Environ., 6: 430-438.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Letourneau, D.K. and A. van Bruggen, 2006. Crop Protection in Organic Agriculture. In: Organic Agriculture: A Global Perspective, Kristiansen, P., A. Taji and J. Reganold (Eds.). CSIRO Publishing, Collingwood, Australia


  • MEA., 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC., USA., ISBN-13: 9781597260404, Pages: 160


  • Michereff-Filho, M., R.N.C. Guedes, T.M.C. Della-Lucia, M.F.F. Michereff and I. Cruz, 2004. Non-target impact of chlorpyrifos on soil arthropods associated with no-tillage cornfields in Brazil. Int. J. Pest Manage., 50: 91-99.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Minor, M.A., T.A. Volk and R.A. Norton, 2004. Effects of site preparation techniques on communities of soil mites (Acari: Oribatida, Acari: Gamasida) under short-rotation forestry planings in New York, USA. Applied Soil Ecol., 25: 181-192.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Moore, J.C., R.J. Snider and L.S. Robertson, 1984. Effects of different tillage practices on Collembola and Acarina in corn production systems. 1. The effects of no-tillage and atrazine. Pedobiology, 26: 143-152.


  • Nair, P.K.R., 2008. Agroecosystem management in the 21st century: It is time for a paradigm shift. J. Trop. Agric., 46: 1-12.
    Direct Link    


  • Nascimbene, J., L. Marini and M.G. Paoletti, 2012. Organic farming benefits local plant diversity in vineyard farms located in intensive agricultural landscapes. Environ. Manage., 49: 1054-1060.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • OECD, 2008. Environmental outlook to 2030. http://www.oecd.org/environment/indicators-modelling-outlooks/40200582.pdf.


  • Oehl, F., E. Sieverding, P. Mader, D. Dubois, K. Ineichen, T. Boller and A. Wiemken, 2004. Impact of long-term conventional and organic farming on the diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Oecologia, 138: 574-583.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pandey, J. and A. Singh, 2012. Opportunities and constraints in organic farming: An Indian perspective. J. Sci. Res., 56: 47-72.
    Direct Link    


  • Paoletti, M.G. and D. Pimentel, 1992. Biotic Diversity in Agro-Ecosystems. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Pages: 356


  • Peck, S.L., B. McQuaid and C.L. Campbell, 1998. Using ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as a biological indicator of agroecosystem condition. Environ. Entomol., 27: 1102-1110.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Perfecto, I., 1990. Indirect and direct effects in a tropical agroecosystem: The maize-pest-ant system in Nicaragua. Ecology, 27: 2125-2134.
    Direct Link    


  • Ponce, C., C. Bravo, D. Garcia de Leon, M. Magana and J.C. Alonsoa, 2011. Effects of organic farming on plant and arthropod communities: A case study in Mediterranean dryland cereal. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 141: 193-201.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Rickerl, D.H., E.A. Curl and J.T. Touchton, 1989. Tillage and rotation effects on Collembola populations and Rhizoctonia infestation. Soil Tillage Res., 15: 41-49.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Robertson, G.P. and S.M. Swinton, 2005. Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: A grand challenge for agriculture. Front. Ecol. Environ., 3: 38-46.
    Direct Link    


  • Rundlof, M., H. Nilsson and H.G. Smith, 2008. Interacting effects of farming practice and landscape context on bumblebees. Biol. Conserv., 141: 417-426.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Samways, M.J., 1981. Comparison of ant community structure (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in citrus orchards under chemical and biological control of red scale, Aonidiella aurantii(Maskell) (Hemiptera: Diaspididae). Bull. Entomol. Res., 71: 663-670.
    Direct Link    


  • Schmidt, M.H., Y. Clough, W. Schulz, A. Westphalen and T. Tscharntke, 2006. Capture efficiency and preservation attributes of different fluids in pitfall trap. J. Arachnol., 34: 159-162.
    Direct Link    


  • Stark, J.D., 1992. Comparison of the impact of a neem seed-kernel extract formulation, Margosan-O and chlorpyrifos on non-target invertebrates inhabiting turf grass. Pestic. Sci., 36: 293-299.
    CrossRef    


  • Thomas, P.J., P. Martin and C. Boutin, 2011. Bush, bugs and birds: Interdependency in a farming landscape. Open J. Ecol., 1: 9-23.


  • Tonhasca, Jr. A., 1993. Carabid beetle assemblage under diversified agroecosystems. Entomologia Experimentalis Applicata, 68: 279-285.
    CrossRef    


  • Tscharntke, T., A.M. Klein, A. Kruess, I. Steffan-Dewenter and C. Thies, 2005. Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett., 8: 857-874.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Joy, V.C. and P.P. Chakravorty, 1991. Impact of insecticides on non-target microarthropod fauna in agricultural soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 22: 8-16.
    CrossRef    PubMed    


  • Weibull, A.C., J. Bengtsson and E. Nohlgren, 2000. Diversity of butterflies in the agricultural landscape: The role of farming system and landscape heterogeneity. Ecography, 23: 743-750.
    CrossRef    


  • Weibull, A.C., O. Ostman and A. Granqvist, 2003. Species richness in agroecosytems: The effect of landscape, habitat and farm management. Biodiversity Conservation, 12: 1335-1355.
    Direct Link    


  • Wiggins, E.A. and E.A. Curl, 1979. Interactions of Collembola and microflora of cotton rhizosphere. Phytopathology, 69: 244-249.


  • Zhang, W., T.H. Ricketts, C. Kremen, K. Carney and S.M. Swinton, 2007. Ecosystem services and dis-services to agriculture. Ecol. Econ., 64: 253-260.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved