HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2013 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 12 | Page No.: 551-557
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2013.551.557
Olive Plants (Olea europaea L.) as a Bioindicator for Pollution
Amal Mohamed Eliwa and Ehab Abdel-Razik Kamel

Abstract: In the present work, olive plant (Olea europaea L.) was used as a biological indicator for pollution in which, molecular and physiological parameters were studied. Olive plants were collected from polluted and non-polluted areas in Jeddah - Saudi Arabia, traffic area as an air polluted area, sewage treatment station as water polluted area, industrial area as solid waste polluted, costal area as marine polluted area and an area without a direct source of pollution far away from the city center, which was used as control. These changes conducted with nucleic acid content, minerals content, pigments and some growth parameters. Results showed significant reductions in DNA and RNA contents under all polluted sites. Mineral contents were varied widely depending on the different pollutants and locations of olive plant. Generally, micro-elements varied (increase/decrease) significantly within collected samples and the source of pollution. All growth parameters were decreased significantly within the studied samples of all pollutant areas except the relative water content was increased. The content of chlorophyll a has decreased highly significantly in all polluted leaves. While the content of chlorophyll b has increased significantly in all polluted leaves especially in air polluted leaves. The total content of carotenoid pigments has decreased highly significantly in all polluted leaves. It was concluded that olive plant can be used as a biological indicator to the environmental pollutants.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Amal Mohamed Eliwa and Ehab Abdel-Razik Kamel, 2013. Olive Plants (Olea europaea L.) as a Bioindicator for Pollution. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 16: 551-557.

Keywords: minerals content, nucleic acid content, pollutants, Olea europaea L., pigments and growth parameters

INTRODUCTION

The weather changes caused by certain gases and solid pollutants can be discussed because these atmospheric changes leave fingerprints certainly clear on living organisms and symptoms that appear along with the analysis can give an idea of the source of emissions and health damage (Ahmad et al., 2007). Human activities in everywhere have increased the number of environmental constraints that cultivated plants have to deal with and atmospheric pollution is probably the main one.

Atmospheric pollution was released from many different anthropogenic sources such as industry, combustion of fossil fuels in vehicular traffic and energy production. Transportation is the most significant source of air pollution in urban areas when it comes to toxic trace elements like lead, so special attention must given to traffic pollutants. Intense road traffic creates gridlock every day and is also responsible for large missions of traffic-related air pollutants (Oliva and Espinosa, 2007).

Sawidis et al. (2011) reported that the gasses of motor vehicles, metalworking industries and other anthropogenic sources are the main sources of air pollution. Atmospheric pollutants are categorized into gaseous (mainly SO2, NOx and O3) and dust, which often includes heavy metals. The increase in concentrations of these pollutants causes progressive reduction in growth and productivity of plants mainly, in correlation with reduction in photosynthetic ability of leaves and closure of leaf stomata of plants (Larcher, 1995).

Olive (Olea europaea L.) is a popular evergreen tree grown and cultivated in the Mediterranean region where several environmental constraints are limiting factors for its productivity. Probably the main restrictions for olive cultivation in the Mediterranean climate are water deficit and salinity stresses, though olive behaves as an intermediate drought and salt tolerant species when compared with other temperate fruit trees (Vitagliano and Sebastiani, 2000).

There are many studies conducted on olive plants, which focused on the effect of salinity, the mechanism of salt tolerance, growth biomass, physiological, biochemical and molecular changes occurring during development and ripening (Chartzoulakis, 2005; Tabatabaei, 2006; Conde et al., 2008; Melgar et al., 2008; Perica et al., 2008).

Generally, plant responses to air pollution are helpful in establishing the early presence of air-borne contaminants, determining the regional distribution of the pollutants and estimating the concentration of each pollutant. Also, providing a passive system for collecting pollutants for chemical analyses later and obtaining direct identification of different pollutants on the basis of plant species and variety affected (Sikora and Chappelka, 2004).

Olive tree leaves were used by Turan et al. (2011) as a bio-indicator for environmental pollution in the Province of Aydin (Turkey) and the possibility to use olive tree (Olea europaea L.) leaves for bio-monitoring and assessment of environmental pollution was shown to be possible in the Mediterranean region where they are indigenous and cultivated.

The present work is aimed to investigate the effect of different sources of pollution on molecular and physiological parameters of olive plants and the possibility to use olive tree leaves as a bio-indicator for environmental pollution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plant material: The olive plant (Olea europaea L.) is commonly found in all five studied areas. Olive leaves of the same age, uniformly around the lower foliage and an initial quantity of about 100 g of each sample were collected. Trees of approximately the same age were chosen and care was taken to avoid selecting leaves with imperfections such as insect infestation, presence of honeydew, bird dropping, pesticide treatment, chlorosis or necrosisand coarse. The sampling was conducted simultaneously at each study area in early summer. Trees were selected randomly, which means no trees standing next to each other were chosen. Immediately after the collection the samples were placed in paper envelopes. The olive leaves were divided into three sets. The first one was taken in fresh state for estimation of pigments and growth parameters. The second set of leaves was air dried and used for estimation of total nucleic acids content. The third one was oven dried and used to estimate some minerals.

Quantitative estimation of nucleic acids: DNA and RNA were extracted following the method adopted by Schmidt and Thannhauser (1945) as described by Morse and Carter (1949). RNA was estimated colorimetrically by the orcinol reaction as described by Dische (1953) while DNA was estimated by diphenylamine (DPA) color reaction as described by Burton (1956).

Determination of certain minerals: The method of extraction adopted was that of Chapman and Pratt (1982). Sodium, potassium, calcium were determined photometrically by using flame emission photometer (B-7-E). Magnesium, chromium, cobalt, cadmium, lead, iron, manganese, zinc and copper were estimated by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FMD3).

Quantitative estimation of pigments: The photosynthetic pigments chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids were determined in the leaves of plant. The spectrophotometric method recommended by Metzner et al. (1965) was used. Five gram fresh weight of leaves was homogenized in 85% aqueous acetone for 5 min. The homogenate was centrifuged and the supernatant was made up to volume with 85% acetone. The extraction was measured against a blank of pure 85% aqueous acetone at three wave lengths of 452.5, 644 and 663 nm using Spekol Spectrocolourimeter VEB Carl Zeiss. Taking into consideration the dilutions made of the pigment fractions, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids were determined as μg mL-1 using the following equations:

Chlorophyll a = 10.3 E663-0.918 E644 = μg mL-1

Chlorophyll b = 19.7 E644-3.87 E663 = μg mL-1

Carotenoids = 4.2 E452.5-(0.264 Chlorophyll a+0.426 Chlorophyll b) = μg mL-1

Then, the fractions were calculated as mg 100 g-1 fresh weight of leaves.

Determination of some growth parameters: Olive leaves were randomly collected from each area and used for the measurements of fresh weight (g), dry weight (g), relative water content (%) and leaf area (cm2).

Determination of leaf relative water content: Leaf relative water content was measured using the method of Yamasaki and Dillenburg (1999).

Determination of leaf area: Leaf area calculated from the weight of leaves. A leaf disk with known surface area was cut with a calibrated cork borer and then weighed. The rest of the leaf was also weighed and leaf area was determined.

Statistical analysis: The statistical analysis of the obtained data was done using the Least Significance Difference test (LSD) at 1 and 5% levels of probability (Snedecor and Cochran, 1973).

RESULTS

Nucleic acid content: The changes in nucleic acid contents (DNA and RNA) in the Olea europaea L. leaves affected by pollutants were recorded in Table 1. DNA and RNA contents were varied according to pollutant's site. As shown in Table 1 that highly significant reductions in DNA and RNA contents under all polluted sites. In which the solid waste pollution gave the highest reduction in DNA and RNA content, while the air pollution gave the lowest effect in DNA content and marine pollution gave the lowest effect on RNA content.

Minerals content: Twelve minerals were determined in all samples of the different polluted sites. Mineral contents vary widely depending on the different pollutant and locations of olive plants (Table 2, 3). Four macro-elements were investigated (Na, K, Ca and Mg) in leaves samples collected from polluted sites. Among the macro nutrients, the concentration of Na recorded high significant increase (14.06, 21.42, 19.63 and 17.85 mg 100 g-1) than the control value (13.09 mg 100 g-1) in all samples studied. The content of K decreased significantly within all samples and the highest value for reduction was observed in leaves samples collected from marine pollution (Table 2).

Also, the content of Ca decreased significantly within all samples and the lowest value (11.00 mg 100 g-1) was observed in leaves samples collected from solid waste pollution (Table 2).

The content of Mg was varied within the studied samples, its high significant increase observed in samples of air pollution (6.89 mg 100 g-1), in water pollution (7.23 mg 100 g-1) and in marine pollution (6.78 mg 100 g-1). While, its high significant decreased (5.19 mg 100 g-1) recorded in leaves samples collected from solid waste pollution (Table 2).

Eight micro-elements were determined in the present study; Mn, Cr, Co, Fe, Zn, Cd, Pb and Cu. In generally, Mn has decreased in all studied samples except in marine pollution samples were highly increased. Cr and Cu have increased in all studied samples except in marine pollution samples. Co and Zn have decreased in all studied samples, Fe and Pb have increased in all studied samples, Cd has decreased in water and marine pollution samples and increased in air and solid waste pollution samples. (Table 2, 3).

Growth parameters: Growth parameters of the studied samples were recorded such as fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area.

Table 1: Changes in DNA and RNA contents of Olea europeaa L. leaves, values listed are expressed as μg nucleic acid 100 g-1 air dried weight, each value is a mean of three determinations
HS: Highly significant change

Table 2: Changes in minerals of Olea europaea L. leaves (mg 100 g-1) oven dried weight
HS: Highly significant change

All these parameters were decreased significantly within the studied samples of all pollutant areas (Table 4). The fresh weight has decreased highly significantly from 2.8 g at the control to the values of 2.4, 1.7, 2.1 and 2.3 g in air polluted, water polluted, solid waste polluted and marine polluted leaves respectively. The dry weight has decreased highly significantly from 1.78 g at the control to the value of 1.2, 0.8, 1.0 and 1.4 g in air polluted, water polluted, solid waste polluted and marine polluted leaves, respectively. Relative water content was increased highly significantly from 36.43% at the control to the values of 50.00, 52.94, 52.38 and 39.13% within the studied samples of all pollutant areas, respectively. Leaf area scored high significant decreased in all samples of polluted areas.

Pigment content: Differences in pigment contents in the Olea europaea L. leaves affected by pollutants are recorded in Table 5. The content in chlorophyll a has decreased highly significantly in all polluted leaves. The content in chlorophyll b has increased significantly from 29.668 mg g-1 at the control to 42.496, 39.504, 38.392 and 41.520 mg g-1 fresh within the studied samples of all pollutant areas, respectively (Table 5). The total content of carotenoid pigments has decreased highly significantly from 3.700 mg g-1 fresh matter at the control to the values of 1.552, 3.332, 2.828 and 1.984 mg g-1 fresh matter, respectively.

Table 3: Changes in minerals of Olea europaea L. leaves (mg 100 g-1) oven dried weight
HS: Highly significant change

Table 4: Changes in some growth parameters of Olea europaea L. leaves
HS: Highly significant change

Table 5: Changes in pigments of Olea europaea L. leaves (mg 100 g-1) fresh weight of leaves
HS: Highly significant change

DISCUSSION

Turan et al. (2011) suggested that the usage of olive tree leaves or other trees as bio-indicators for environmental pollution is very common and useful instead of physical indicators.

Now a day, plants can be accepted and effectively used as biomonitors of environmental pollution. Micro and Macro element analysis of plant samples has for many years been an alternative, easy and effective way of conducting ecological research in urban areas (Aksoy et al., 2000). The use of vegetation as passive sampler in biomonitoring bears the advantage of high spatial and temporal resolution due to the excellent availability of plants and low sampling costs. Many plant groups, including the evergreen trees, have been used for monitoring air pollution and their (dis) advantages for this purpose have been pointed out (Laaksovirta and Olkkonen, 1977; Murin, 1995).

This study has shown significant changes in the contents of nucleic acids and mineral elements, in all growth parameters and also in pigments content according to different type of pollutants.

Atmospheric pollution is a direct and undesirable effect of human activities. Air pollutants are those gases which should not be present at all in the clean atmosphere or which are normally present in it, but reach quantities that impair crop production. Visible symptoms of air pollutant injury on plants are not easily observable and can be monitored only in particularly experimental conditions (for example; sensitive cultivars and controlled fumigation). Vitagliano and Sebastiani (2000) reported that the effects of air pollutants (such as O3 and CO2) on plants may be very subtle and the effects on crop productivity may be very slow and may escape control. Mansfield (1998) suggested that CO2 pollution may disrupt the control of water relations in some species because their stomata do not close sufficiently in CO2-enriched air.

In this study a highly reduction in chlorophyll a under pollution was recorded, these result concomitant with Nanos and Ilias (2007). They demonstrated that reduction of light quantity and/or quality reaching chloroplasts possibly caused the reduction of photosynthetic rate and quantum yield. They reported that photo system damage may have occurred due to heavy metal toxicity, often associated with cement dust contamination. In addition, the presence of dust between the peltate on the lower leaf surface must have caused-among other possible effects-a decrease in leaf conductance to water vapor and CO2 movement, although without significantly affecting transpiration.

Al-Absi et al. (2009) and Madejon et al. (2006) reported that the content of micro elements in olive leaves are lower than in olive fruits and the concentration of trace elements in the leaves and fruits decreased with time, in consequence, the toxicity risk to the food web diminished.

It is clearly that, tree leaves absorb dusts of elemental pollutant both from the air and from the soil through roots. Therefore, chemical composition of leaves varies with the seasons, especially of heavy metals, which is generally higher at the end of summer. Therefore, this season seems to be appropriate period of sampling. There many trees and shrubs have been particularly used for establishing selected elements even in trace and ultra-trace levels (Ahmad et al., 2007).

Results showed that marine pollution in olive trees decreased potassium concentrations, this may be due to a direct effect of sodium, displacing potassium and/or causing loss of potassium from the root tissue (Kchaou et al., 2010). A positive correlation between the leaf sodium concentration and total leaf area per plant was recorded in the present work and decreases in total leaf area per plant were correlated with increases of leaf sodium concentration.

Plants grown under NaCl salinity showed an increase in sodium and chloride concentrations and a decrease in potassium and calcium (Bartolini et al., 1991; Tattini et al., 1995; Chartzoulakis et al., 2002; Vigo et al., 2002). Salinity can directly affect nutrient uptake, such as sodium reducing potassium uptake or by chloride reducing nitrate uptake (Grattan and Grieve, 1998).

In olive cultivars, salt tolerance is associated with effective mechanisms of ion exclusion and retention of sodium and chloride in the roots (Massimiliano, 1994; Tattini et al., 1995; Chartzoulakis et al., 2002), limiting the accumulation of these ions into actively growing shoots. Massimiliano (1994) reported that the resistance mechanism of salt-tolerant olive cultivar is probably related to sodium exclusion by roots and the ability to maintain an appropriate K/Na ratio in actively growing tissues. Ion exclusion and compartmentation at the root level regulates ion concentration in the xylem sap preventing accumulation of potentially toxic ions in the aerial part (Flowers and Yeo, 1989; Drew et al., 1990). The effectiveness of exclusion mechanism depends on the salinity level.

Also all growth parameters of the studied samples were recorded such as fresh weight, dry weight and leaf area were decreased significantly within the studied samples of all pollutant areas except the relative water content was increased.

Salinity stress caused deleterious effects on many growth parameters in trees and shrubs like olive trees (Therios and Misopolinos, 1988; Tattini et al., 1992, 1995; Chartzoulakis et al., 2002; Vigo et al., 2005). An important mechanism to avoid the deleterious effects of salinity in olive trees is the ability to limit uptake and/or transport of saline ions (sodium and chloride) from the root zone to aerial parts (Chartzoulakis, 2005).

Total leaf area per plant was significantly reduced in all cultivars by salt treatment, which was due to both a decrease of leaf growth and a leaf abscission phenomenon during the salt treatments (Kchaou et al., 2010).

Giorgelli et al. (1994) reported that treated plants by gradient of sulphur dioxide concentrations in the range 0-100 pp have not induced visible injury symptoms, but treatment induced significant depression in net CO2 assimilation, stomatal conductance and transpiration and an increase in vapor pressure deficit. Transpirating surface was dramatically reduced in plants by the treatment and also total leaf thickness was also reduced.

Minnocci et al. (1999) reported that long-term exposure to low O3 concentrations produces significant effects on olive leaves physiology (gas exchange and stomatal aperture) and morphology (individual leaf area and stomatal density). They observed that after 100 days of treatment, leaf drop and development of necrotic spots were observed in O3-fumigated plants, significant reductions in photosynthetic activity (57%) and stomatal conductance (69%) were detected in O3-fumigatedplants compared with control plants, a significant reduction in stomatal conductance (40%) was observed, leaves that developed after exposure to O3 showed decreased stomatal aperture and also the large O3-induced reduction in transpiring stomatal surface could have significant effects on olive productivity. The influence of ambient ozone pollution on olive leaf gas exchange irrigated with saline water was also studied by Abusafieh and Nanos (2011).

Mezghani et al. (2005) in a study on fluoride accumulation by vegetation in the vicinity of a phosphate fertilizer plants in Tunisia have reported that absorption and accumulation of fluoride are more important in trees with evergreen foliage (olive tree) than in with deciduous leaves. They also observed that there was a highly significant correlation between foliar fluoride concentration and atmospheric fluoride concentration up to a distance of 16 km from the pollution source.

Air and soil pollution with trace metals specially heavy metals is a matter of great interest, especially in urban areas. Biomonitoring of air quality using plants has been widely applied to detect and to monitor the effects of pollution (Sawidis et al., 1995a-c; Bargagli, 1998; Mingorance and Oliva, 2006; Gajic et al., 2009). Although biomonitoring of air quality using plants has been practised for many years, in many European countries, it has still not been applied at a satisfactory level, due to different and even opposing results, depending first of all on the type of soil and bedrock. Trees are very efficient at trapping atmospheric particles and they play a special role in reducing the level of fine, “high risk” respirable particulates, which have the potential to cause serious human health problems (IPHRS, 2004).

In conclusion, the use of olive tree leaves as a biological indicator to environmental pollutants is a useful technique for the detection of the seriousness of those pollutants on the environment and human health, directly/indirectly, especially with regard to crops and plants of economic importance which are used as food for humans, either directly or through the manufacture of those plants.

REFERENCES

  • Abusafieh, D. and G.D. Nanos, 2011. Influence of ambient ozone pollution on olive leaf gas exchange irrigated with saline water. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 13: 806-810.
    Direct Link    


  • Ahmad, S., M. Daud and I.H. Qureshi, 2007. Use of biomonitors to assess the atmospheric changes. Proc. Pak. Acad. Sci., 44: 201-219.


  • Aksoy, A., U. Sahin and F. Duman, 2000. Robinia pseudo-acacia L. as possible biomonitor of heavy metal pollution in kayseri. Turk. J. Bot., 24: 279-284.


  • Al-Absi, K.M., F.M. Al-Nasir and A.Y. Mahadeen, 2009. Mineral content of three olive cultivars irrigated with treated industrial wastewater. Agric. Water Manage., 96: 616-626.
    CrossRef    


  • Bargagli, R., 1998. Trace Elements in Terrestrial Plants: An Ecophysiological Approach to Biomonitoring and Biorecovery. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Pages: 324


  • Bartolini, G., C. Mazuelos and A. Troncoso, 1991. Influence of Na2SO4 and NaCl salts on survival, growth and mineral composition of young olive plants in inert sand culture. Adv. Hort. Sci., 5: 73-76.
    Direct Link    


  • Burton, K., 1956. A study of the conditions and mechanism of the diphenylamine reaction for the colorimetric estimation of deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochem. J., 62: 315-323.
    Direct Link    


  • Chapman, H.D. and F.P. Pratt, 1982. Methods of Analysis for Soils, Plants and Water. 1st Edn., California University, Agriculture Division, California, pp: 184-203


  • Chartzoulakis, K.S., 2005. Salinity and olive: Growth, salt tolerance, photosynthesis and yield. Agric. Water Manage., 78: 108-121.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Chartzoulakis, K., M. Loupassaki, M. Bertaki and I. Androulakis, 2002. Effects of NaCl salinity on growth, ion content and CO2 assimilation rate of six olive cultivars. Sci. Hortic., 96: 235-247.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Conde, C., S. Delrot and H. Geros, 2008. Physiological, biochemical and molecular changes occurring during olive development and ripening. J. Plant Physiol., 165: 1545-1562.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Dische, E.L., 1953. Physiological studies on herbicide (cotoran). J. Am. Chem., 22: 4014-4014.


  • Drew, M.C., P.S. Hold and G.A. Picchioni, 1990. Inhibition by NaCl of net CO2 fixation and yield of cucumber. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 115: 472-477.
    Direct Link    


  • Flowers, T.J. and A.R. Yeo, 1989. Effect of Salinity on Plant Growth and Crop Yields. In: Environmental Stress in Plants, Cherry, J.H. (Ed.). Springer Verlag, Berlin, pp: 101-130


  • Gajic, G., M. Mitrovic, P. Pavlovic, B. Stevanovic, L. Djurdjevic and O. Kostic, 2009. An assessment of the tolerance of Ligustrum ovalifolium Hassk. to traffic-generated Pb using physiological and biochemical markers. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 72: 1090-1101.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Giorgelli, F., A. Minnocci, A. Panicucci, C. Vitagliano and G. Lorenzini, 1994. Effects of long-term SO2 pollution on olive-tree gas exchange and leaf morphology. Acta Hort., 356: 185-188.
    Direct Link    


  • Kchaou, H., A. Larbi, K. Gargouri, M. Chaieb, F. Morales and M. Msallem, 2010. Assessment of tolerance to NaCl salinity of five olive cultivars, based on growth characteristics and Na+ and Cl exclusion mechanisms. Sci. Hort., 124: 306-315.
    CrossRef    


  • Grattan, S.R. and C.M. Grieve, 1998. Salinity-mineral nutrient relations in horticultural crops. Scientia Horticulturae, 78: 127-157.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • IPHRS, 2004. Report on air pollution caused by substances from exhaust emissions. ISO Health Related Particle Sampling Conventions IS 7708, Institute of Public Health of the Republic of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.


  • Laaksovirta, K. and H. Olkkonen, 1977. Epiphytic lichen vegetation and element contents of Hypogymnia physodes and pine needles examined as indicators of air pollution at Kokkola, W Finland. Ann. Bot. Fennici, 14: 112-130.


  • Larcher, W., 1995. Physiological Plant Ecology: Ecophysiology and Stress Physiology of Functional Groups. 3rd Edn., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, ISBN-13: 9783540581161, Pages: 506


  • Madejon, P., T. Maranon and J.M. Murillo, 2006. Biomonitoring of trace elements in the leaves and fruits of wild olive and holm oak trees. Sci. Total Environ., 355: 187-203.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mansfield, T.A., 1998. Stomata and plant water relations: Does air pollution create problems? Environ. Pollut., 101: 1-11.
    CrossRef    


  • Massimiliano, T., 1994. Ionic relations of aeroponically-grown olive genotypes, during salt stress. Plant Soil, 161: 251-256.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Melgar, J.C., J.P. Syvertsen and F. Garcıa-Sanchez, 2008. Can elevated CO2 improve salt tolerance in olive trees?. J. Plant Physiol., 165: 631-640.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Metzner, H., H. Rau and H. Senger, 1965. (Studies on Synchronisierbareit individual pigment mutants lack of Chlorella) Untersuchungen zur synchronisierbareit einzelner pigment mangel mutanten von Chlorella. Planta, 65: 186-194.


  • Mezghani, I., N. Elloumi, F.B. Abdallah, M. Chaieb and M. Boukhris, 2005. Fluoride accumulation by vegetation in the vicinity of a phosphate fertilizer plant in Tunisia. Fluoride, 38: 69-75.
    Direct Link    


  • Mingorance, M.D. and S.R. Oliva, 2006. Heavy metals content in N. oleander leaves as urban pollution assessment. Environ. Monit. Assess., 119: 57-68.
    CrossRef    


  • Minnocci, A., A. Panicucci, L. Sebastiani, G. Lorenzini and C. Vitagliano, 1999. Physiological and morphological responses of olive plants to ozone exposure during a growing season. Tree Physiol., 19: 391-397.
    CrossRef    


  • Morse, M.L. and C.E. Carter, 1949. The synthesis of nucleic acids in cultures of Escherichia coli, strains B and B/r. J. Bacteriol., 58: 317-326.
    Direct Link    


  • Murin, A., 1995. Basic criteria for selection of plant bioindicators from regional flora for monitoring environmental pollution. Biologia, 50: 37-40.
    Direct Link    


  • Nanos, G.D. and I.F. Ilias, 2007. Effects of inert dust on olive (Olea europaea L.) leaf physiological parameters. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 14: 212-214.
    CrossRef    


  • Oliva, S.R. and A.J.F. Espinosa, 2007. Monitoring of heavy metals in topsoils, atmospheric particles and plant leaves to identify possible contamination sources. Microchem. J., 86: 131-139.
    CrossRef    


  • Perica, S., S. Goreta and G.V. Selak, 2008. Growth, biomass allocation and leaf ion concentration of seven olive (Olea europaea L.) cultivars under increased salinity. Sci. Hort., 117: 123-129.
    CrossRef    


  • Sawidis, T., J. Breuste, M. Mitrovic, P. Pavlovic and K Tsigaridas, 2011. Trees as bioindicator of heavy metal pollution in three European cities. Environ. Pollut., 159: 3560-3570.
    CrossRef    


  • Sawidis, T., M.K. Chettri, G.A. Zachariadis and J.A. Stratis, 1995. Heavy metals in aquatic plants and sediments from water systems in macedonia, Greece. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety, 32: 73-80.
    CrossRef    


  • Sawidis, T., M.K. Chettri, G.A. Zachariadis, J.A. Stratis and M.R.D. Seaward, 1995. Heavy metal bioaccumulation in lichens from Macedonia in northern Greece. Toxicol. Environ. Chem., 50: 157-166.
    CrossRef    


  • Sawidis, T., A. Marnasidis, G. Zachariadis and J. Stratis, 1995. A study of air pollution with heavy metals in Thessaloniki city (Greece) using trees as biological indicators. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 28: 118-124.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Schmidt, G. and S.J. Thannhauser, 1945. A method for the determination of deoxyribonucleic acid, ribonucleic acid and phosphoproteins in animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem., 161: 83-89.
    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Sikora, E.J. and A.H. Chappelka, 2004. Air Pollution Damage to Plants. 2nd Edn., ACES, USA., Pages: 480


  • Snedecor, G.W. and W.G. Cochran, 1973. Statistical Methods. 6th Edn., Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA., pp: 593


  • Tabatabaei, S.J., 2006. Effects of salinity and N on the growth, photosynthesis and N status of olive (Olea europaea L.) trees. Sci. Hortic., 108: 432-438.
    Direct Link    


  • Tattini, M., P. Bertoni and S. Caselli, 1992. Genotypic responses of olive plants to sodium chloride. J. Plant Nutr., 15: 1467-1485.


  • Tattini, M., R. Gucci, M.A. Coradeschi, C. Ponzio and J.D. Everard, 1995. Growth, gas exchange and ion content in Olea europaea plants during salinity stress and subsequent relief. Biol. Planta, 95: 203-210.
    Direct Link    


  • Therios, I.N. and N.D. Misopolinos, 1988. Genotypic response to sodium chloride salinity of four major olive cultivars (Olea europea L.). Plant Soil., 106: 105-111.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Turan, D., C. Kocahakimoglu, P. Kavcar, H. Gaygisiz, L. Atatanir, C. Turgut and S.C. Sofuoglu, 2011. The use of olive tree (Olea europaea L.) leaves as a bioindicator for environmental pollution in the Province of Aydin, Turkey. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 18: 355-364.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vigo, C., I.N. Therios and A.M. Bosabalidis, 2005. Plant growth, nutrient concentration and leaf anatomy of olive plants irrigated with diluted seawater. J. Plant Nutr., 28: 1001-1021.
    CrossRef    


  • Vigo, C., I.N. Therios, A. Patakas, M. Karatassou and A. Nastou, 2002. Changes in photosynthetic parameters and nutrient distribution of olive plants (Olea europaea L.) cultivar Chrondolia Chakidiskis under NaCl, Na2SO4 and KCl salinities. Agrochimica, 46: 33-46.


  • Vitagliano, C. and L. Sebastiani, 2000. Physiological and biochemical remarks on environmental stress in olive (Olea europaea L.). Acta Hort., 586: 435-440.


  • Yamasaki, S. and L.R. Dillenburg, 1999. Measurements of leaf relative water content in Araucaria angustifolia. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal, 11: 69-75.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved