HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2011 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 3 | Page No.: 182-194
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2011.182.194
Macro Invertebrate Community from Sonamarg Streams of Kashmir Himalaya
S. U. Bhat, A. H. Sofi, T. Yaseen, A. K. Pandit and A. R. Yousuf

Abstract: This study analyses a macroinvertebrate community survey for River Sindh and its tributary including Baltal, Yashmarg, Sonamarg and Thajwas Grar considering the extreme hydrological conditions linked with the seasonal low-flow period typical for some streams in this area. This study attempts to provide an overview of the macro invertebrate assemblages and physico-chemical variables of the River Sindh and its important tributary. Four study sites were selected from the River Sindh and its tributary including Baltal, Yashmarg, Sonamarg and Thajwas Grar for studying the ecological distribution of Macroinvertebrate assemblages. Totally, 33 taxa of macroinvertebrates were recorded from the two streams belonging to Mollusca-3 (Gastropoda-2 and Bivalvia-1), Annelida-1 and Arthropoda-29 (Insecta-29). Among insects Ephemeroptera (7), Trichoptera (6) and Diptera (13) dominated. Except Yashmrag all sites were found devoid of annelids while as the mollusks were found absent at Sonamarg. Highest values of Shannon Weiner Index were found at Yashmarg (2.42) and lowest at Sonamarg (1.99) while as highest and lowest Sorensen’s similarity coefficient were found between Baltal/Thajwas Grar (0.68) and Yashmarg/Thajwas Grar (0.39), respectively. A perusal of the data on physico-chemical characteristics showed that these streams were hard water type with high dissolved oxygen content. The ionic composition of the stream waters revealed the predominance of bicarbonate and calcium. Insecta dominated both qualitatively as well as quantitatively and the study revealed that the substrate compositions dominated by gravel, pebble and leaf litters are primary determinants of the invertebrate community structure recording maximum species diversity and abundance. Sample locations impacted by Amarnath yatris pilgrimage comparatively reflected slightly higher increase in nutrients than Thajwas Grar almost devoid of pilgrimage effect.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
S. U. Bhat, A. H. Sofi, T. Yaseen, A. K. Pandit and A. R. Yousuf, 2011. Macro Invertebrate Community from Sonamarg Streams of Kashmir Himalaya. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 14: 182-194.

Keywords: sonamarg, ecological distribution, Macroinvertebrate, stream and diversity

INTRODUCTION

Historically, stream ecologists have considered braided river channels to be relative biological deserts (Percival, 1932) with communities characterized by low species diversity and dominated by a few common, generalist species (Sagar, 1986; Scrimgeour and Winterbourn, 1989). However, a more holistic view of the river which includes the wider floodplain and underlying ground waters has revealed high spatio-temporal habitat heterogeneity in which spatially minor habitats contribute disproportionately to corridor biodiversity (Stanford, 1998; Ward et al., 1999).

The significance of stream discharge, substrate composition, temperature,water chemistry, Allochthonous and Autochthonous inputs for the structure of stream habitats and benthic communities has been widely confirmed (Cross et al., 2006; Gafner and Robinson, 2007; Clarke et al., 2008; Haidekker and Hering, 2008; Javanshir et al., 2008; Alvarez and Pardo, 2009) but the role of low discharges and drought is more difficult to decipher. Benthic invertebrates respond in different ways to in-stream changes of flow (Wood et al., 2001; Monk et al., 2008). In freshwater sediments, benthic invertebrates are diverse and abundant (Strayer, 2006) but they are often patchily distributed and relatively difficult to sample, especially when they live in deep subsurface sediments. Thus, the species richness and functional importance of freshwater benthic invertebrates generally go unnoticed until unexpected changes occur in ecosystems. Unanticipated changes in freshwater ecosystems are often due to alterations in the complex connections among Sediment dwelling species and associated food webs (Goedkoop and Johnson, 1996; Lodge et al., 1998; Stockley et al., 1998) or to disturbances, such as floods or drought (Covich, 1993; Power, 1995; Johnson et al., 1998) that alter the species composition of the benthos. These examples illustrate that benthic invertebrate species function in different ways that are important to maintaining ecosystem functions such as energy flow in food webs. Many benthic species convert live plant and dead organic material into prey items for larger consumers in complex food webs. In the process of maintaining energy flow, these benthic species simultaneously provide essential ecosystem services, such as nutrient cycling and aeration of sediments. Different species comprise distinct functional groups that provide ecological integrity. In some cases, these functional groups may be represented by only a few species, so that any loss of species diversity could be detrimental to continued ecosystem functioning. Thus, it is increasingly important to protect the biodiversity of benthic communities to lower the risk of unexpected and unwanted consequences.

Macroinvertebrate communities are integral components of freshwater ecosystems which influence sediment and bottom-water chemistry (Rhoads et al., 1977; Aller, 1980), alter sediment organic content (Pearson and Rosenberg, 1978) and structure (Rhoads and Young, 1970; Bokuniewicz et al., 1975; Rhoads et al., 1978; Rhoads and Boyer, 1982) and serve as major prey species for crustaceans and fish (Virnstein, 1977). Benthic organisms accelerate nutrient transfer to overlying open waters of lakes (Lindegaard, 1994; Threlkeld, 1994; Blumenshine et al., 1997; Clarke et al., 1997) as well as to adjacent riparian zones of streams (Covich et al., 1996; Johnson and Covich, 1997; Naiman and Décamps, 1997; Wallace et al., 1997).

In recent years, applied ecologists have recognized the utility of biological monitoring, with particular attention given to survey designed to sample benthic macroinvertebrates (Rosenberg and Resh, 1993). Unlike chemical data which provides water quality information at a discrete point in time, biological organisms are long-term integrators of environmental stressors. In addition, macroinvertebrates are more effective than chemical methods for detecting non-point source pollution. In part, this is because of the spectrum of taxa-specific responses among invertebrates to environmental stressors and their long-term response to these factors. Finally, macroinvertebrates are also good environmental indicators because they are common components of freshwater ecosystems, relatively sessile in their aquatic phase and can be inexpensively sampled (Furse et al., 2006; Arimoro et al., 2007a, b). The lakes of valley has been studied extensively while as there are only very few reports regarding the benthic fauna of streams in the vale of Kashmir (Engblom and Lingdell, 1999; Mahdi et al., 2005; Bhat and Pandit, 2006). Further in the recent years there has been a tremendous pressure in the catchement of these streams because of Amarnath Pilgrimmage likely to impact the water quality downstream. Taking above assumptions into consideration it was thought worthwhile to make an attempt of taxonomic survey of benthic fauna of streams in the Sonamarg area of Kashmir Valley.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All sites were sampled on a single occasion during the July, September, October and December 2009. Benthic invertebrate samples were collected using a kick-net (mesh size 250 μm) and five samples taken over 2.5 m2 were pooled into a single composite sample following the semi-quantitative procedure of Stark et al. (2001). Organisms were collected by stirring and disturbing the substrate by kicking for about 5 min to a depth of several inches to dislodge burrowing macro invertebrates ahead of the net per square meter (Hoffsten and Malmqvist, 2000; Ilmonen and Paasivirta, 2005). Samples were also obtained from the same locations by brushing organisms off the cobbles and rocks, following standard methods of Borror et al. (1976) and APHA (1998). The organisms were sorted out and preserved in 4% formalin and 70% alcohol depending upon the type of organisms to be preserved. The soft-bodied organisms were preserved in 70% alcohol while the shelled organisms like molluscs in 4% formalin (Borror et al., 1976). Identifications were made to the lowest taxonomic level possible, using keys by Edmondson (1959), Borror et al. (1976), Pennak (1978), McCafferty (1981), Ward (1992), Engblom and Lingdell (1999), Winterbourn et al. (2000), Yildiz and Balik (2005) and Rossetti et al. (2006). The parameters like water temperature, pH and conductivity (APHA, 1998) were measured with digital thermometer, pH metre and conductivity metre, respectively while dissolved oxygen (APHA, 1998; Wetzel and Likens, 1979) was estimated by Winkler’s titration method. The parameters like chloride (Argentimeteric), alkalinity (Titrimetric) and hardness (EDTA titrimetrc method) were measured by tittrimetry methods while ammonical nitrogen (Phenate method), nitrate (Sodium salicylate), phosphorus (Ascorbic acid)-(APHA, 1998; Wetzel and Likens, 1979). Statistical analysis was carried out with the help of SPSS software.

Study area and sites: The high altitude valley of Kashmir is an ovoid basin with a nearly flat floor of around 4920 km2 and is existing between the lesser and greater Himalayas. The vale of Kashmir with tectonic origin is 135 km long and 45 km broad at its middle, lying as an oval bowl between the Zanaskar range to the North and Pir Panjal range to the South. Most of the valley lies at an elevation of just over 1500 m, though its floor rises steadily from northwest to southwest (Wadia, 1966). The valley of Kashmir being surrounded by Himalayan ranges resembles the medditraean type being characterised by a rainfall occurring throughout the year except 2-3 dry periods in summer and autumn. The study area is only accessible for 5-6 months as the national highway which connects Srinagar with the Ladakh region is open for only few months which restrict the continuous sampling because of harsh climatic conditions.

Geology: Kashmir valley one of the many NW-SE oriented depressions of regional dimensions of Himalayan mountain systems is an intermontane valley bounded by four major ranges (Pir Panjal range, Saribal range, Great Himalayan range and Qazinag range).The valley itself occupies the core of a slightly basinal synclinorium where Triassic rocks are surrounded by Paleozoic series and are overlain by Pleistocene and recent sediments. The limestone is by no means pure and contains from 15-90% dolomite with the higher values being more spread. It is generally a very fine carbonate mosaic with small proportions of fossil fragments and mainly Ferruginous insoluble grains. The Pleistocene beds form the karewa series and alluvial plains comprising mainly fine lacustrine sandstones. In between the limestone ridges and karewa terraces are embedded a thick bed of alluvium mainly of coarse gravel and boulders. Due to diversified geological formations, lithological variations, tectonic complexity etc the valley is usually characterised by soft rocks (Karewas and alluvium) and hard rock (Panjal traps and Triassic limestones).

River Sindh locally known as SENDH originates from the Panjtarni glacial fields at an altitude of 4,250 m (a.s.l) at the base of Saskut, a peak (4,693 m a.s.l) in the Ogput Range running parallel to the North-West to South-East. It has a catchment area of 1,556 km2 which extends between the geographical co-ordinates of 34° 07' 40" to 34° 27' 46" N latitude and 74° 40' 37" to 75° 35' 15" E longitude. There is abundant Triassic limy shale and slaty limestones in the headwater region of the Sindh valley, while as in the middle granite and sandstone replace them as a dominant rock type (De Terra and Paterson, 1939).

After its origin from Panjtarni glacial fields at an altitude of 4,250 m (a.s.l) at the base of Saskut, a peak 4,693 m (a.s.l). River Sindh drops steeply north westward to reach the main strike valley. Gathering momentum, the river runs towards Sonamarg between steeply towering mountain areas, over a boulder stream bed, emerging into the pleasant upland serenity of the Sonamarg, as if to rest before it plunges roaring headlong torrent sharply to the Southwest through the Gagangir gorge, 4000 ft (1,230 m) deep. Four study (Fig. 1) sites were selected for studying the ecological distribution of Macroinvertebrates in the mainstream channel of River Sindh and one site was selected from the tributary of Sindh namely, Baltal (site-I), Yashmarg (site II), Sonamarg (site III) and Thajwas Grar (site-IV).

Fig. 1: Map of study area showing position of sampling sites

Site-I: Baltal is located 14 km upstream from Sonamarg, lies between geographical co-ordinates of 34° 15' 23" N latitude and 75° 24' 29" E longitude and at an altitude 2,850 m (a.s.l). Being located at the Zoji La pass, it has a sacred cave in the upper reaches dedicated to Lord Shiva. This site is surrounded by rocky barren area. The bottom texture at this sampling site was mixture of cobble, gravel and pebbles (Table 1).

Site-II: Yashmarg is famous picnic spot located near Sonamarg, known for its pastures, ponies and firs. It lies between geographical co-ordinates 34° 17' N and 75° 19' E and at an altitude of 2,712 m (a.s.l). The bottom texture at this site was sandy with cobble (Table 1).

Site-III: Sonamarg is located 14km downstream of Baltal, at an altitude 2,705 m (a.s.l) within geographical co-ordinates of 34° 18' N and 75° 15' E. The bottom texture at this was muddy and sandy with pebbles (Table 1).

Site-IV: Thajwas Grar is located 3 km away from Sonamarg. It lies between geographical co-ordinates, 34° 17' N latitude and 75° 12' E longitude and at an altitude, of 2,617 m (a.s.l). Thajwas Grar is known for the glaciers, the miniature plateaus, snowfields, pines and islets. The bottom texture at the study site was dominated by gravel, pebbles, sand and leaf litter (Table 1).

Table 1: Mean density of various groups of benthic fauna at different sites in the Sindh River System from July-2009 to December 2009
n.r = Not recorded

RESULTS

Four sites were selected that represented the extreme geographic and hydrologic conditions within the area (Fig. 1). Sites depicted from nearly pristine conditions to very moderate to high tourist influenced destination with variations in steep, substrate, flow, allochthonous matter. Gernal chrateristics of four study sites are shown in Table 2.

The benthic invertebrate fauna exhibited diversity in species composition and abundance across the study sites (Table 1). In all 33 taxa of Macroinvertebrates, insects as well as non-insects were recorded from four sampling sites belonging to Mollusca-3 (Gastropoda-2 and Bivalvia-1), Annelida-1 and Arthropoda-29 (Insecta-29). Thus, benthos was comprised of 29 insect and 4 non-insect forms. The non-insect community was comprised of only 3 species of Mollusca and 1 Annelida. Among the stream invertebrates, the three most common species found at all the four sites during the period of study included Baetis rhodani, Epeorus sp., Chironomus sp. against the fourteen rare ones (Erpobdella octoculata, Atherix sp., Capnia Vernalis, Dytiscus sp., Ephemerella sp., Hexatoma sp., Limoniinae sp., Perlodidae sp., Rhithrogena sp., Rhithrogena lobifera, Rhyacophila obscuras, Stenopsychae sp., Tabanus sp., and Telmatoscopus sp.) found only at one site especially at Yashmarg and Thajwas Grar (Table 1).

Table 2: General characteristics of four study sites

Certain forms were recorded only from two and three sites out of four signaling towards habitat heterogeneity. Amongst the 33 taxa identified the greatest number of taxa was noted for Site IV (21 taxa), followed by Site-II (18 taxa), site I (17 taxa) and Site-III (12 taxa).

Annelida was represented by only three individuals of a lone species of Eprobdella octoculata only restricted to Yashmarg. Phylum Mollusca was represented by a total of three species, namely Corbicula sp., Radix ovata, Lymnaea sp. and was altogether absent at Yashmarg and Sonamarg. The densities of the group were quite low and the mean density of 12±7 ind. m-2 oscillating between minimum of 5 ind. m-2 in July to a maximum of 14 ind. m-2 in September. The maximum number of individuals were observed in the month of September (14 ind. m-2) while as mollusks were altogether absent in the month of December.

Fig. 2: Relative density (%) of various taxonomic groups of benthic fauna at different sites in the Sindh River System from July 2009 to December 2009

Fig. 3: Shannon weiner diversity indux of macro-invertebrates

The species rich class Insecta is itself an assemblage of different forms belonging to 5 different orders (Ephemeroptera-7, Diptera-13, Trichoptera-6, Plecoptera-2 and Coleoptera-1). The mean density of Insecta fluctuated from 88 ind. m-2 at Site-III to 185 ind. m-2 at Site-IV, with an overall mean density of 128 ind. m-2 from July-2009 to December-2009. Baetis rhodani and Nigrobaetis gracilis were the dominant insect taxa, recording the maximum density of 51 ind. m-2 at Baltal and 47 ind. m-2 at Thajwas Grar, respectively from July-2009 to December-2009. Insecta class was dominated by order Diptera followed by Ephemeroptera and Trichoptera at all four sites. While as two taxa belonging to Plecopterans were recorded from only two sites (Yashmarg and Thajwas Grar) and only one taxa of Coleoptera was recorded from Yashmarg. In general, the mean density of benthos was recorded as 136 ind. m-2, with a range of 88 ind. m-2 at Site-III-195 ind. m-2 at Site-IV from July-2009 to December-2009.

Table 3: Similarity coefficient (Sorenson index) between different selected sites on the basis of Macroinvertebrates

Among the sites, the highest mean density of all the benthic organisms was recorded for site-IV (195 ind. m-2), followed by site-II (133 ind. m-2), site I (127 ind. m-2) and declining to 88 ind. m-2 at site-III from July-2009 to December-2009 (Table 1). Annelida was least abundant group with highest relative density of only 2.25% at Yashmarg while being absent at rest of the sites. Mollusca showed highest relative density of 15.51% at Baltal but was completely absent at Sonamarg. In general, Arthropoda (Insecta) depicted the highest relative density at almost all the study sites with 100% contribution at Sonamarg (Fig. 2).

The Shannon Diversity Index incorporates both the taxa richness as well as the evenness of the numbers of individuals in each taxa. Highest values of the Index (Fig. 3) were found at Yashmarg (2.42) followed by Thajwas Grar (2.39), Baltal (2.03) and declining to the lowest at Sonamarg (1.99). Sorensen’s Similarity Index was employed to benthic fauna in order to determine the similarity between the different sites in terms of benthic fauna. The higher S orensen’s similarity coefficient (Table 3) was found between Baltal/Thajwas Grar (0.68), Sonamarg/Thajwas Grar (0.60). The sites like Baltal/Sonamarg (0.48), Yashmarg/Sonamarg (0.46), Baltal/Yashmarg (0.45), Yashmarg/Thajwas Grar (0.39) were fairly similar.

Table 4: Summary statistics of physico-chemical parameters of water at different study sites
* = mg L-1; ** = μg L-1

A perusal of the data on physico-chemical characteristics showed that these streams were hard water type with high dissolved oxygen content (Table 4). The ionic composition of the stream waters revealed the predominance of bicarbonate and calcium.

DISCUSSION

This study has shown that physical characteristics of stone microhabitats such as water depth, current velocity, horizontal position, embeddedness and size (surface area) all to a varying degree influenced spatial distribution of invertebrate density and richness in the studied streams. The composition of the fauna of a given stream is at least partially, determined by the streams environmental characteristics such as temperature, altitude and physical stability. The density of aquatic macroinvertebrate species and communities is controlled by a variety of environmental factors such as habitat characteristics (Hynes, 1970; Peeters and Gardeniers, 1998), sediment quality (Chapman and Lewis, 1976), sediment grain size (Tolkamp, 1980) and by biological factors such as competition and predation (Kohler, 1992; MacKay, 1992; Macneil et al., 1999). Negi and Singh (1990) considered stream flow, nature of substratum and organic pollution to generally regulate the species composition and dominance of different taxa in various stretches of rivers.

The presence and absence of certain species, due to the differences in microenvirons, accounts for the differences in total number of species. Sediment type and sediment organic content are known to have pronounced effect on the spatial distribution of benthic organisms (Wu and Richards, 1981; Cyrus and Martin, 1988) with more benthic animals occurring in sandy sediment than in mud (Boltt, 1969; Boltt and Allanson, 1975; Cyrus and Martin, 1988). In the present investigation, the results indicated that substrate composition at Thajwas Grar dominated by gravel, pebble and leaf litter proved primary determinant of the invertebrate community structure recording maximum species diversity and abundance. In fact, the capacity of Macroinvertebrates to exploit areas with optimum food supply might be explained by their abundance (Grimas, 1965). Further high discharge has been shown to increase the invertebrate number of taxa elsewhere (Cantonati et al., 2006) which does not stands true in the present study as the site recording maximum diversity is a small tributary to the River Sindh with comparatively low discharge.

Collier et al. (1998) suggested that the higher diversity in a stream ecosystem is directly proportional to the variability in its substrate. Both biotic and biotic factors play a role in shaping the organization of communities and in the distribution and abundance of species .The Main River Sindh (Fig. 1) and its tributary (Sites IV, II, I, III) were dominated by individuals from Arthropoda (Emere and Nasiru, 2007; Arimoro et al., 2007). Group Arthropoda mostly dominated at sites where bottom texture was dominated with hard stones (i.e. Sites I, II and IV). The contribution of other groups was very low. Macroinvertebrates recorded highest diversity at Site-IV, right bank tributary and at Site II. Site I was represented by 17 taxa which are likely to be the result of low temperature regime, low organic input and generally severe habitat conditions at such altitudes. Site-II was represented by 18 taxa, may be because of the composition of substrate, being mainly dominated by cobbles which provide a stable environment for macroinvertebrates. Site-III was represented by only 12 taxa throughout the study period. Such a comparatively low diversity may be because of the composition of bottom substrate, being mainly dominated by sand and mud.

Table 5: Pearsons correlation between different parameters
** = Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed), * = Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed), n = 13

Highest macroinvertebrate diversity was recorded at site-IV (21 taxa), right bank tributary which can be the result of availability of food resources and open canopy cover. Plecopterans were found at sites (S-II and S-IV), may be attributed to the low temperature regime at such altitudes. Only one individual from Coleopterans was recorded from Site-II. Molluscs and Annelida, had their highest representation at sites (S-II and S-IV), characterized by high organic matter in the form cattle faeces and plant litter. Macroinvertebrates recorded highest diversity for Ephemeroptera, Diptera and Trichoptera at almost all sites. At all sites the class Insecta contributed more than 90% of the benthic population and was dominated by Ephemeroptera, Diptera and Trichoptera (Table 1). However, in the present study Gammarus sp. was not observed which otherwise is found dominant in the stream of Kashmir valley and its dominance in macro invertebrates has also been reported elsewhere (Shaw and Minshall, 1980; Duran, 2006).

The presence of Erpobdella octoculata may be probably due to the greater power of utilizing the organic matter below the surface of bottom sediments (Poddubnaja and Sorokin, 1961) which makes them less dependent on the immediate inflow of food, a conjecture also held by Kajak and Dusoge (1975). In general, oligochaete communities have been observed to thrive well in soft depositing substrates rather than stony beds. Hutchinson (1993) concluded that Diptera are, by far, the most diverse order of insects in freshwaters. They are, in fact, the most diversified of any major taxon of freshwater organisms. The dominance pattern, in terms of density of insects, more precisely by chironomid larvae is related to bottom stream and mud water interface which plays important role in dipteran larval populations as sand and gravel substrate (Jankovic, 1969) supports small chironomid populations because these provide little food and substrate while as large particle size substrate is unsuitable for case construction. Williams (1996) considered Ephemeroptera, Trichoptera, Coleoptera and several families of Diptera (Simuliidae, Tipulidae and Chironomidae) to be particularly well dapted to temporary freshwaters which does not hold true for the present study, thereby indicating that these species seem to be ubiquitous.

Glazier and Gooch (1987) have suggested that proportion of insect taxa/non-insecta taxa be largely determined by water quality, with amphipods dominating hard water. In the present study, however, amphipods were lacking either due to insufficient sampling or extreme cold conditions. Excepting Thajwas Grar which is almost free from effect of Amarnath pilgrimage, rest of the sites relatively display higher concentration of ions and specific conductance. Lacs of yatris are visiting every year to Amarnath cave in this fragile ecosystem thereby putting lot of pressures as there is no sufficient arrangement of toilets for yatris. Additionally waters were found to hold good amount of dissolved oxygen because of cold conditions. Ionic concentration is further indicative of catchment rich in calcium and magnesium. Both calcium (r = -0.663) and nitrate ( r= -0.682) were found to have dominant influence on Macroinvertebrate density as is visible from the Pearson’s negative correlation coefficient (Table 5).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study is based partly on the first and second author’s M.Sc. thesis carried out by the first and second author under the joint supervision of Dr Sami Ullah Bhat, Prof. Ashok K. Pandit and Prof A.R Yousuf at Aquatic Laboratory and Limnology and Fisheries Laboratory of CORD. We appreciate helpful suggestions and ideas stimulated by discussions in respect of exploring the various dimensions of varied aquatic ecosystems in the valley of Kashmir with Prof. Azra Nahaid Kamili (HoD) and Prof. G.A. Bhat. This work was supported and funded by grants from the department of Environmental Science, University of Kashmir Srinagar. Authors are thankful to Dr Arshid Jehangir for Statistical analysis of the data and the logistic support during the fieldwork provided by Prof. Azra Nahaid Kamili (HoD) is highly acknowledged.

REFERENCES

  • Alvarez, M. and I. Pardo, 2009. Dynamics in the trophic structure of the macroinvertebrate community in a Mediterranean, temporary stream. Aquat Sci., 71: 202-213.
    Direct Link    


  • Aller, R.C., 1980. Relationships of Tube-Dwelling Benthos with Sediment and Overlying Water Chemistry. In: Marine Benthic Dynamics, Tenore, K.R. and B.C. Coull (Eds.). University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC., pp: 285-308


  • APHA., 1998. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 20th Edn., American Public Health Association, Washington, DC., USA., ISBN-13: 9780875532356, Pages: 1220


  • Arimoro, F.O., R.B. Ikomi and E. Efemuna, 2007. Macroinvertebrate community patterns and diversity in relation to water quality status of river Ase, Niger Delta, Nigeria. J. Fish. Aquatic Sci., 2: 337-344.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Arimoro, F.O., R.B. Ikomi and C.M.A. Iwegbue, 2007. Ecology and abundance of oligochaetes as indicators of organic pollution in an urban stream in Southern Nigeria. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 10: 446-453.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    


  • Arimoro, F.O., R.B. Ikomi and C.M.A. Iwegbue, 2007. Water quality changes in relation to diptera community patterns and diversity measured at an organic effluent impacted stream in the Niger Delta, Nigeria. Ecol. Indicators, 7: 541-552.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bhat, S.U. and A.K. Pandit, 2006. Influence of Substrate on the fate of macrozoobenthos in Saeskoon water quality, a small tributary of Vashu stream. J. Res. Dev., 6: 35-41.


  • Blumenshine, S.C., Y. Vadeboncoeur, D.M. Lodge, K.L. Cottingham and S.E. Knight, 1997. Benthic�pelagic links: Responses of benthos to water-column nutrient enrichment. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc., 16: 466-479.
    Direct Link    


  • Bokuniewicz, H.J., R.B. Gordon and D.C. Rhoads, 1975. Mechanical properties of the sediment-water interface. Marine Geol., 18: 263-278.
    CrossRef    


  • Boltt, R.E. and B.R. Allanson, 1975. The benthos of some Southern African lakes.part III.The benthos of Lake Nhlange, Kwazulu, South Africa. Trans. Roy. Soc. Souyh Afr., 41: 241-262.
    CrossRef    


  • Boltt, R.E., 1969. The benthos of some South African Lakes part III. The epifauna and infauna of the benthos of Lake Sibaya. Trans. Roy. Soc. South Afr., 38: 249-269.


  • Borror, D.J., D.M. Delong and C.A. Triplehorn, 1976. An Introduction to the Study of Insects. 4th Edn., Holt Reinhert and Winston, USA., pp: 852


  • Cantonati, F., R. Gerecke and E. Bertuzzi, 2006. Springs of the Alps-sensitive ecosystems to environmental change: From biodiversity assessment to long-term studies. Hydrobiology, 562: 59-96.
    CrossRef    


  • Chapman, M.A., M.H. Lewis and V.M. Stout, 1976. An Introduction to the Freshwater Crustacea of New Zealand. William Collins (New Zealand) Ltd., Auckland, ISBN: 0002169053


  • Clarke, A., R. McNally, N. Bond and P.S. Lake, 2008. Macroinvertebrate diversity in headwater streams: A review. Freshwater Biol., 53: 1707-1721.
    Direct Link    


  • Clarke, K.D. and D.A. Scruton, 1997. The benthic community of stream riffles in New foundland, Canada and its relationship to selected physical and chemical parameters. J. Anim. Ecol., 12: 113-121.
    Direct Link    


  • Collier, K.J., R.J. Wilcock, and A.S. Meredith, 1998. Influence of substrate type and physico-chemical conditions on macroinvertebrate faunas and biotic indices of some lowland Waikato, New Zealand, streams. J. Marine Freshwater Res., 32: 1-19.
    Direct Link    


  • Covich, A.P., 1993. Water and Ecosystems. In: Water in Crisis, Gleick, P.H. ( Ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp: 40-55


  • Covich, A.P., T.A. Crowl, S.L. Johnson and M. Pyron, 1996. Distribution and abundance of tropical freshwater shrimp along a stream corridor: Response to disturbance. Biotropica, 28: 484-492.
    Direct Link    


  • Cross, W.F., J.B. Wallace, A.D. Rosemond and S.L. Eggert, 2006. Wholesystem nutrient enrichment increases secondary production in a detritus-based ecosystem. Ecology, 87: 1556-1565.
    Direct Link    


  • Cyrus, D.P. and T. Martin, 1988. Distribution and abundance of the benthos in the sediment of Lake Cubhu: A freshwater lake in Zululand, South Africa. J. Limnol. Soc. Southern Afr., 14: 93-101.
    CrossRef    


  • De Terra, H. and T.T. Paterson, 1939. The Ice Age in the Indian Sub-Continent and Associated Human Cultures (with Special Reference to Jammu, Kashmir, Ladakh, Liddar and Central Peninsular India). Aryan Books International, New Delhi
    Direct Link    


  • Duran, M., 2006. Field experiment on drift and colonization of benthic macroinvertebrate in Gokpinar stream (Denizli, E Turkey). Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 9: 493-496.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Edmondson, W.T., 1959. Rotifera. In: Freshwater Biology, Edmondson, W.T. (Ed.). Wiley and Sons, New York, pp: 420-494


  • Emere, M.C. and E.C. Nasiru, 2007. Macroinvertebratess as indicators of the water quality of an urbanized stream kaduna Nigeria. J. Fisheries Int., 2: 152-157.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Engblom, E. and P.E. Lingdell, 1999. Analysis of Benthic Invertebrates. In: River Jhelum, Kashmir Valley: Impact on the Aquatic Environment, Nyman, L. (Ed.). Swedmar Publications, Sweden, pp: 39-75


  • Furse, M.T., D. Hering, O. Moog, P. Verdonschot and R.K. Johnson et al., 2006. The STAR project: Context, objectives and approaches. Hydrobiologia, 566: 3-29.
    CrossRef    


  • Gafner, K. and C.T. Robinson, 2007. Nutrient enrichment influences the responses of stream macroinvertebrates to disturbance. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 26: 92-102.
    Direct Link    


  • Glazier, D.S. and J.L. Gooch, 1987. Macroinvertebrate assemblages in Pennsylvania (U.S.A.) springs. Hydrobiology, 150: 33-43.
    CrossRef    


  • Goedkoop, W. and R.K. Johnson, 1996. Pelagic-benthic coupling: Profundal benthic community response to spring diatom deposition in mesotrophic Lake Erken. Limnol. Oceanography, 41: 636-647.
    Direct Link    


  • Grimas, U., 1965. Effects of impoundment on the bottom fauna of high mountain lakes. Acta Univ. Uppsalieensis, 51: 5-24.


  • Haidekker, A. and D. Hering, 2008. Relationship between benthic insects (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, Coleoptera, Trichoptera) and temperature in small and medium-sized streams in Germany: A multivariate study. Aquat Ecol., 42: 463-481.
    CrossRef    


  • Hoffsten, P.O. and B. Malmqvist, 2000. The macroinvertebrate fauna and hydrogeology of springs in central Sweden. Hydrobiologia, 436: 91-104.
    CrossRef    


  • Hutchinson, G.E., 1993. A Treatise on Limnology: The Zoobenthos. Vol. 4. John Wiley and Sons, New York


  • Hynes, H.B.N., 1970. The Ecology of Running Waters Liverpool. In: The Ecology of Aquatic Insects, Resh, V.H. and D.M. Rosenberg (Eds.). Praeger Publishers, New York, pp: 625


  • Ilmonen, J. and L. Passivirta, 2005. Benthic macrocrustacean and insect assemblages in relation to spring habitat characteristic: Patterns in abundance and diversity. Hydorbiologia, 533: 99-113.
    CrossRef    


  • Jankovic, M., 1969. The chironomid communities in the Yugoslav part of the river Danube. Arch. Hydrobiol., 36: 61-70.


  • Javanshir, A., M. Shapoori and S. Jamili, 2008. Diversity of benthic invertebrates fauna and secondary production in Southern Caspian Sea Basin, case study on Tajan River Estuary. J. Fish. Aquatyic Sci., 3: 353-365.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Johnson, S.L., A.P., Covich, T.A. Crowl, A. Estrada, J. Bithorn and W.A. Wurtsbaugh, 1998. Do seasonality and disturbance influence reproduction in freshwater atyid shrimp in headwater streams, Puerto Rico?. Proc. Int. Assoc. Theoretical Applied Limnol., 26: 2076-2081.


  • Johnson, S.L. and A.P. Covich, 1997. Scales of observation of riparian forests and distributions of suspended detritus in a prairie river. Freshwater Biol., 37: 163-175.
    CrossRef    


  • Kajak, Z. and K. Dusoge, 1975. Macrobenthos of lake taltowisko. Eko. Pol., 23: 295-316.


  • Kohler, S.L., 1992. Competition and the structure of a benthic stream community. Ecol. Monographs, 62: 165-188.
    Direct Link    


  • Lindegaard, C., 1994. The role of zoobenthos in energy flow of two shallow lakes. Hydrobiologia, 275-276: 313-322.
    CrossRef    


  • Lodge, D.M., R.A. Stein, K.M. Brown, A.P. Covich, C. Bronmark, J.E. Garvey and S.P. Klosiewski, 1998. Predicting impact of freshwater exotic species on native biodiversity: Challenges in spatial and temporal scaling. Aust. J. Ecol., 23: 53-67.


  • Mackay, R.J., 1992. Colonization by lotic macroinvertebrates: A review of processes and patterns. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 49: 617-628.


  • Macneil, C., J.T.A. Dick and R.W. Elwood, 1999. The dynamics of predation on Gammarus spp. (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Biol. Rev., 74: 375-395.
    CrossRef    


  • McCafferty, W.P., 1981. Aquatic Entomology. The Fishermens and Ecologists Illustrated Guide to Insects and their Relatives. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Boston


  • Mahdi, M.D., F.A. Bhat and A.R. Yousuf, 2005. Ecology of macrozoobenthos in Rambiara stream, Kashmir. J. Res. Dev., 5: 90-100.
    Direct Link    


  • Monk, W.A., P.J. Wood, D.M. Hannah and D.A. Wilson, 2008. Macroinvertebrate community response to inter-annual and regional river flow regime dynamics. River Res. Applied, 24: 988-1001.
    CrossRef    


  • Naiman, R.J. and H. Decamps, 1997. The ecology of interfaces: Riparian zones. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Systematics, 28: 621-658.
    Direct Link    


  • Negi, M. and H.R. Singh, 1990. Substratum as determining factor for bottom fauna in River Alaknanda. Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad., 56: 417-423.
    Direct Link    


  • Pearson, T.H. and R. Rosenberg, 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution of marine environment. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Ann. Rev., 16: 229-311.
    Direct Link    


  • Peeters, E.T.H.M. and J.J.P. Gardeniers, 1998. Logistic regression as a tool for defining habitat requirements of two common gammarids. Freshwater Biol., 39: 605-615.
    CrossRef    


  • Pennak, R.W., 1978. Fresh-Water Invertebrates of the United States. 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons, USA., ISBN-13: 9780471042495, Pages: 803


  • Percival, E., 1932. On the depreciation of trout fishing in the Oreti (or New River), Southland,with remarks on conditions in other parts of New Zealand. N. Z. Fish. Bull., 5: 48-48.


  • Poddubnaja, T.L. and I.I. Sorokin, 1961. Glubjna sloja optimalnogo pitanjia tubificid v svjazi sich permescenjami V-grunte Bjull. Inst. Biol. Vodochran, 10: 14-17.


  • Power, M.E., 1995. Floods, Food Chains and Ecosystem Processes in Rivers. In: Linking Species and Ecosystems, Jones, C.G. and J.H. Lawton (Eds.). Chapman and Hall, New York, pp: 52-60


  • Rhoads, D.C. and L.F. Boyer, 1982. The Effects of Marine Benthos on Physical Properties of Sediments: A Successional Perspective. In: Animal-Sediment Relations: The Biogenic Alterations of Sediments, McCall, P.L. and M. Tevesz (Eds.). Plenum Press, New York, pp: 3-52


  • Rhoads, D.C. and D.K. Young, 1970. The influence of deposit feeding benthos on bottom sediment stability and community trophic structure. J. Mar. Res., 28: 150-178.


  • Rhoads, D.C., P.L. McCall and J.Y. Yingst, 1978. Disturbance and production on the estuarine seafloor. Am. Scientist, 66: 577-586.
    Direct Link    


  • Rhoads, D.C., R.C. Aller and M. Goldhaber, 1977. The Influence of Colonizing Benthos on Physical Properties of Sediments and Chemical Diagenesis of the Estuarine Seafloor. In: Ecology of Marine Benthos, Coull, B.C. (Ed.). University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, SC., pp: 113-138


  • Rosenberg, D.M. and V.H. Resh, 1993. Introduction to Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macroinvertebrates. In: Freshwater Biomonitoring and Benthic Macro-Invertebrates, Rosenberg, D.M. and V.H. Resh (Eds.). Chapter 1, Chapman and Hall, New York, USA., ISBN: 9780412022517, pp: 1-9


  • Rossetti, G., K. Martens, C. Meisch, S. Tavernelli and V. Pieri, 2006. Small is beautiful: Diversity of frershwater Ostracods (Crustacean, Ostracoda) in marginal habitats of the province of Parma (Northern Italy). J. Limnol., 65: 121-131.
    Direct Link    


  • Sagar, P.M., 1986. The effect of floods on the invertebrate fauna of a large unstable braided river. N. Z. J. Marine Freshwater Res., 20: 37-46.
    CrossRef    


  • Scrimgeour, G.J. and M.J. Winterbourn, 1989. Effects of floods on epilithon and benthic macroinvertebrate populations in an unstable New Zealand river. Hydrobiologia, 171: 33-44.
    CrossRef    


  • Shaw, D.W. and G.W. Minshall, 1980. Colonization of an introduced substrate by stream macroinvertebrates. Oikos, 34: 259-271.
    Direct Link    


  • Stanford, J.A., 1998. Rivers in the landscape: introduction to the special issue on riparian and groundwater ecology. Freshwater Biol., 40: 402-406.
    CrossRef    


  • Stark, J.D., I.K.G. Boothroyd, J.S. Hardiing, J.R. Maxted and M.R. Scarsbrook, 2001. Protocols for sampling macroinvertebrates in wadeable streams. New Zealand Macroinvertebrate Working Group Report No 1. Prepared for the Ministry for the Environment. Sustainable Management Fund Project No. 5103.


  • Stockley, R.A., G.S. Oxford and R.F.G. Ormond, 1998. Do invertebrates matter? Detrital processing in the River Swale-Ouse. Sci. Total Environ., 210-211: 427-435.
    CrossRef    


  • Strayer, D.L., 2006. Challenges for freshwater invertebrate conservation. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc., 25: 271-287.
    Direct Link    


  • Threlkeld, S.T., 1994. Benthic�pelagic interactions in shallow water columns: An experimentalist`s perspective. Hydrobiologia, 275-276: 293-300.
    CrossRef    


  • Tolkamp, H.H., 1980. Organism-substrate relationship in lowland streams. Agric. Res. Rep., 907: 211-211.


  • Virnstein, R.W., 1977. The importance of predation by crabs and fishes on benthic infauna in Chesapeake Bay. Ecology, 58: 1199-1217.
    Direct Link    


  • Wadia, D.N., 1966. Geology of India. 3rd Edn., Mcmillane and Co., London, pp:397-399


  • Wallace, J.B., S.L. Eggerton, J.L. Meyer and J.R. Webster, 1997. Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science, 277: 102-104.


  • Ward, J.V., 1992. Aquatic Insect Ecology: 1-Biology and Habitat. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, pp: 438


  • Ward, J.V., K. Tockner and F. Schiemer, 1999. Biodiversity of floodplain ecosystems: Ecotones and connectivity. Regulated Rivers: Res. Manage., 15: 125-139.
    Direct Link    


  • Wetzel, R.G. and G.E. Likens, 1979. Limnological Analysis. 2nd Edn. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, pp: 1-860


  • Williams, D.D., 1996. Environmental constraints in temporary frershwaters and their consequences for the insect fauna. J. North Am. Bentho. Soc., 15: 634-650.
    Direct Link    


  • Winterbourn, M.J., K.L.D. Gregson and C.H. Dolphin, 2000. Guide to the Aquatic Insects of New Zealand. 3rd Edn., Bulletin of the Entomological Society of New Zealand, New Zealand, pp: 108


  • Wood, P.J., D.M. Hannah, M.D. Agnew and G.E. Petts, 2001. Scales of hydroecological variability within a ground water-dominated stream. Regulated Rivers Res. Manage., 17: 347-367.
    CrossRef    


  • Wu, R.S.S. and J. Richards, 1981. Variations in benthic community in a subtropical estuary. Mar. Biol., 64: 191-198.


  • Yildiz, S. and S. Balik, 2005. The Oligochaeta (Annelida) fauna of the inland waters in the lake district (Turkey). Ege Univ. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 22: 165-172.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved