HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2011 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 123-127
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2011.123.127
Land Suitability Evaluation in Damghan Plain for Barley, using Compare and Conformity Methods (Northeast-Iran)
Sh. Ashraf, R. Manoukyan and Sh. Ayoubi

Abstract: In this study, land suitability evaluation based on FAO guidelines on the land evaluation system has been determined for barley irrigated area of about 3400 ha in the south of plains Damghan. In order to have more reliable soil data, particularity to control the old soil map of the area, a new soil survey was carried out in the area. South soils of Damghan plain were classified based on semi detailed studies of three physiogrphy units, four map units and two order Aridisols and Entisols. Climatic Data were used from Damghan meteorological synoptic stations for climate evaluation for barley. With respect to climate and soil severe limitations in the study area, the results of map units as the assessment methods include the storie, square root and the number of simple constraints were the same as N2 with permanent unsuitable.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Sh. Ashraf, R. Manoukyan and Sh. Ayoubi, 2011. Land Suitability Evaluation in Damghan Plain for Barley, using Compare and Conformity Methods (Northeast-Iran). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 14: 123-127.

Keywords: plain Damghan, barley, Land evaluation, simple limitation method and square root method

INTRODUCTION

Detailed soil spatial information is required for many environmental modeling and land management application (Burrough, 1996). As current soil surveys were not designed to provide such detailed soil information (Zhu, 1999), the quality of soil maps which are increasingly used for land evaluation, land suitability analysis, land use planning and Geographic Information System (GIS) application and accuracy of procedures used for crop recommendations would be questionable The most serious limitations of the current soil survey include uncertainty regarding the presence of inclusions, lack of mechanism to quantify spatial variability (Rogwski and Wolf, 1994) and the assignment of properties derived from typical pedons to the entire map unit, regardless of the inherent spatial and temporal variability of field soils (Beckett and Webster, 1971; Bouma et al., 1982; Breeuwsma et al., 1986). Barley is one of the major crops in Damghan Plain. Its production is an important source of income for many farmers. FAO guidelines on the land evaluation system (FAO, 1976, 1985) were widely used for the land suitability. This system was based on matching between land qualities/characteristics and crop requirements. Physical land evaluation methods (Sys et al., 1991) are crucial for evaluating potentials and constraints of land for intended land use. Physical resources, such as soil, climate, hydrology and topography are evaluated. Different technical procedures were used for physical land evaluation ranging from simple methods based on expert knowledge to more complex methods based on simulation models. Salehi et al. (2003) expressed that although criteria for purity of mapping units have been improved; however, traditional soil mapping approaches are not able to reasonably show the variability of pedons and top soil properties even in a detailed soil map named at series level. Njiki et al. (2005) performed a land evaluation project for Shouyang County in Shanxi Province, China, in which maize, soybean, potato; sunflower, wheat as well as tree crops were studied. For this purpose, land suitability classification was carried out using parametric method and the consequent land suitability maps were prepared for crops under traditional and mechanized cultivations. Dunshan et al. (2006) investigated the land suitability for agricultural crops in Danling county-Sichuan province, China-using the Sys`s parametric evaluation system. The final aim of this evaluation is to facilitate farmers’ choice of the best crop to be cultivated (for small areas) and decision makers in planning the rural development (for large areas). Several crops were analyzed; in particular, the suitability for rice was compared to the one for other summer crops like sweet potato and maize.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area and project date: The present study was conducted on Damghan Plain, Semnan Province in Northeast of Iran during 2009-2010 approximately 54" 20� E" 54' 28' E", 36" 5' 36" 3' N and covers an area of 3400 ha. Base map is selected from Topographic map with 1:50,000 scale. It falls in drought-prone region of Semnan, Iran. The Damghan is located in desert margins and low rainfall, plant of crops has encountered with some difficulties.The serious problems of this area is water shortage. Most of the study area’s soils are new alluvial sediments in period of the Fourth of Geology. Parent material in the northern and western of plain are sediments mixed with sand and gravel.

Material: Basically, various forms of originally collected and derived data were used in the study. The crucial data sources are (a) topographic maps, (b) soil maps, (c) hydrological maps, (d) infrastructure accessibility maps, (e) fertility soil map, (f) ecological requirements of the Damghan Plain obtained through research results from literature review, expert opinions, local farmers and (g) other published and unpublished information, such as agricultural statistics, soil and population reports, and horticultural crops reports.

Methodology: The methodology used for the physical land suitability analysis is a multi-criteria evaluation based on FAO land evaluation framework (FAO,1976, 1985). The methodology consists in matching soil/land qualities against barley needs and assigning a suitability rating to each land characteristic.

Fig. 1: Ragional unbrothermic figure

In order to develop a set of themes for evaluation and ultimately to produce a suitability map for Damghan Plain, the crop requirement in terms of land qualities was reviewed (Sys et al., 1991; FAO, 1985). In this research used the following land evaluation methods including storie ,, square root, the simple limits, the number and severity of limits: FAO assessment methods can be done in three stages:

To determine the properties of lands:

The following properties are used for the determination of the characteristics of the land.

Determine climation properties (Fig. 1): Climate data and those related to different stages of plant growth (Table 2) were taken from Damghan soil and water research institute and physiological requirements of barley were extracted from tables prepared specifically for Iran
Determine land properties: it is including soil depth, soil texture, gypsum and lime contents, soil salinity (EC) and alkalinity (ESP), drainage and percentage of aggregates. Also, Properties of soil fertility such as organic mater (OM%) and soil acidity (pH) were considered in terms of soil fertility
Match the land requirements(for barley) with land properties: When the land requirements (physiologic needs for barley) with land characteristics match, are used FAO methods to be determine the of quality classes of lands suitability and factors limiting growth. Equations used to determine the lands index in various ways

Storie method (Storie, 1976) is used for calculating the land index (I) following equation:

I = A * B/100 * C/100 * ... ...

where, I is land index and A, B, C.... are rating of different factors effective on land index.

Table 1: Determine classes of land suitability for FAO methods

Table 2: Barley growth cycle in study region

The square root method is used to calculate t of land index ( I ) the equation below:

where, R is one of the factors with Minimum of Rating, A, B, C.... are rating of different factors effective on land index, D-Determine and Comparsion classes of land suitability for barley based on fitness indicators obtained from the Storie and the square root methods with Table 1.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

With regarding to results obtained from climation properties and climatic data (Fig. 1) and climatic suitability evaluation that was given by Sys et al. 1991, the climatic characteristics of region are not suitable (N2) for barley plantation (Table 4). The results showed that the soils on the basis of soil taxonomy system were classified as Entisols and Aridisols (Table 3). The results according to description of soil profiles and physical and chemical analyses of soil samples showed the level of gravel, Exchangeable Sodium (ESP) and salinity in land units 1.1, 1.2 and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) and salinity in land units 2.1, 3.1 were the most limitating factors for barley plantation in this region (Table 5).

Therefore, these parameters will improve the yield of barley. Table 6 illustrates the comparison of qualitative land suitability methods results for barley plant. all of evaluation methods were N2. Also, Fig. 2 shows the qualitative land units map of the region obtained from different methods.

Table 3: Soil classifiation of study region

Table 4: Factor rating of Climatic for Barley in Damghan plain

Table 5: Quantities of land Index properties and factor rating in land unit for barley
R:Rating

Table 6: Comparsion methods of land evaluation and Land Index-climatic index in land unit for barley
LI: Land index, CI: Climatic index

Fig. 2: Map of land unit in Damghan plain for Barely

The ultimate evaluation of the qualitative land suitability for barley using simple limitation and number and severity of limits and square root and parametric methods are given in Table 6. The results of the physical evaluation showed a close correlation between all of the methods (the results were N2). Jafarzadeh and Abbasi (2006) indicated that Simple Limitation method and Number and Severity of Limits show similar suitability classes, However, in many studies, the use of the square root method display the more realistic results in suitability classes.. The results of the physical evaluation showed a close correlation between two method limited and parametric. Behzad et al. (2009) showed that from the methods used i.e., simple limitation and Storie and Square root methods, the latter (Square root methods) produced more realistic results for barley, wheat and alfalfa on the existing conditions of the region. Limiting factors in different crop yield in the region along with climatic variables included soil physical properties, especially carbonate contents, soil salinity and drainage. Yasmina et al. (2001) showed that by the use of the parametric methods, much of the croplands of the region were in critical conditions: the most limiting factors of which including soil texture, soil depth and drainage. The main crops of the area were wheat, barely, pea, bean and onion. Al-Areba et al. (2007) showed the evaluation class suitable to permanently not suitable for Barley and wheat in Essaouira Province, Morocco.This was due to the different conditions that the crops require for their developments in the local area in question.Generally, the most important limiting factors in barley production in the Damghan plain included climate(deficit rainfall during the growing season) and physical properties of the soil, especially gravel, Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP) and salinity in land unit 1.1, 1.2 and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage (ESP)and salinity in land unit 2.1, 3.1. Albaji et al. (2009) showed that the indexes obtained for alfalfa,Wheat and barley were higher on comparison to that developed for maize. Shahbzi and Jafarzadeh (2004) suggested that the parametric method based on square root is more realistic than others.

CONCLUSION

The results showed that the methods used which include simple limitation, number and severity of limits and parametric methods (Storie and square root methods), on the region had close correlation .The results of this study showed that climatic characteristics of the region were unsuitable for barley plantation on the all methods. All parts of the study area were classified as non-suitable for barley because of physical and chemical soil parameters on the all methods. Furthermore, the most limiting chemical factors considered in this area were soil salinity and alkalinity. The unsuitable land units in the study area based on quantitative evaluation and according to actual yield of the region were land unit 1.1, 1.2 ,2.1 ,3.1 4.1, respectively. These results are confirmed by the calculated land index for each land unit. The qualitative land suitability evaluation assists decision makers in ensuring that lands are used according to their capacities to satisfy human needs for present and future generations, thus, sustaining ecological and economic productivity of natural resources. On the other hand, the soil maps for agricultural suitability designed in this research can be helpful in carrying out the management processes.

REFERENCES

  • FAO, 1976. A Framework for land evaluation. Food and Agriculture Organization, Vol. 32, Soils Bulletin No. 32. Rome.


  • FAO., 1985. Guidelines: Land evaluation for irrigated agriculture. FAO Soils Bulletin, No. 55, FAO, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/x5648e/x5648e00.htm.


  • Storie, R.E., 1976. Storie Index Rating. Division of Agricultural Science, University of California, Berkeley


  • Sys, C., E. Vanranst and J. Debvay, 1991. Land Evaluation, Part: III. General Adminstration for Development Coopration Agriculture, Brussels, Belgium


  • Burrough, P.A., 1996. Opportunity and Limitation of GIS-Based Modeling of Solute Transport at the Regionl Scale. In: Aplication of GIS to the Modeling of Non-Point Source Pollutants in the Vadose Zone, Corwin, D.L. and K. Loage (Eds.). SSSA., Madison, WI, pp: 19-38


  • Rogwski, A.S. and J.K. Wolf, 1994. Incorporating variability into soil maps unit delineations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 58: 163-174.


  • Zhu, A.X., 1999. Fuzzy Inference of Soil Patterns: Implications for Watershed Modeling. In: Advanced Information Technologies for Assessing Nonpoint Source Pollution in the Vadose Zone, Corwin, D.L., K. Loague and T.R. Ellsworth (Eds.). AGU Publication, Washington, DC


  • Beckett, P.H.T. and R. Webster, 1971. The relation between cost and utility in soil survey. Eur. J. Soil Sci., 22: 466-480.
    CrossRef    


  • Bouma, J., De Loat, P.J.M. van Holst and Th. J. van De Nes, 1982. Soil survey invest. Report No. 38. USDA Soil Conserv. Serv., Washington, DC.


  • Breeuwsma, A., J.H.M. Wosten, J.J. Vleeshoumer, A.M. van Slobbe and J. Bouma, 1986. Derivation of land qualities to assess environmental problems from soil survey. Soil Sci. Sco. Am. J., 50: 186-190.


  • Jafarzadeh, A.A. and G. Abbasi, 2006. Qualitative land suitability evaluation for the growth of onion, potato, maize and alfalfa on soils of the Khalat pushan research station. Biologia, 61: S349-S352.
    CrossRef    


  • Shahbazi, F. and A.A. Jafarzadeh, 2004. Qualitative evaluation of land suitability Khusheh-Mehr region of Bonab in East Azarbaijan for wheat, barley, alfalfa, onion, sugarbeet and maize. J. Agric. Sci., 14: 69-86.
    Direct Link    


  • Behzad, M., M. Albaji, P. Papan, S.B. Nasab, A.A. Naseri and A. Bavi, 2009. Qualitative evaluation of land suitability for principal crops in the Gargar Region, Khuzestan Province, Southwest Iran. Asian J. Plant Sci., 8: 28-34.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Abdelkak, Y., M. Aghrod, N.A. Mohamed, E. Botte and Y. Briza et al., 2001. Land evaluation in the province of ben slimane, Morocco. Proceedings of the 21st Course Professional Master Remote Sensing and Natural Resource Evaluation, November 10, 2000-June 22, 2001, Foreign Affairs, Istituto Agronomico Per L'oltremare, Italy, pp: 1-148.


  • Adel, A.A., A.S.A. Salami, A. Ouafae, B. Rigobert, D. Laura and G. Gebremeskel et al., 2007. Land evaluation in essaouira province Morocco. Proceedings of the 27th Professional Course on Geomatics and Natural Resources Evaluation, November 6, 2006-June 22, 2007, Foreign Affairs, Istituto Agronomico Per L'oltremare, pp: 1-213.


  • Albaji, M., A.A. Naseri, P.P. Apan and S.B. Nasab, 2009. Qualitative evaluation of land suitability for principal crops in the West Shoush Plain, Southwest Iran. Bulg. J. Agric. Sci., 15: 135-145.
    Direct Link    


  • Salehi, M.H., M.K. Eghbal and H. Khademi, 2003. Comparison of soil variability in a detailed and a reconnaissance soil map in central Iran. Geoderma, 111: 45-56.
    Direct Link    


  • Assam, G.A.N., A. Barberis, V.M.F. Calderon, S. Chimenti and W. Feng et al., 2005. Land evaluation in the shouyang county, shanxi province, China. Proceedings of the 25th Course Professional Master Geomatics and Natural Resources Evaluation, November 8, 2004-June 23, 2005, Foreign Affairs, Istituto Agronomico Per L'oltremare, Italy, pp: 1-141.


  • Chen, D., C. De Bari, S. De Santis, H. Deng and L.M. Di Lucchio et al., 2006. Land evaluation in danling county, sichuan province, China. Proceedings of the 26th Course Professional Master Geomatics and Natural Resources Evaluation, November 7, 2005-June 23, 2006, Foreign Affairs, Istituto Agronomico Per L'oltremare, Italy, pp: 1-153.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved