HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2010 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 2 | Page No.: 59-65
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2010.59.65
A Study of Intraspecies Variations of Indian Gerbil, Tatera indica Hardwicke, 1807 (Muridae, Rodentia) in Eastern Border of Iran
A. Khajeh and J. Meshkani

Abstract: In this study, 93 specimens of adult Indian Gerbil (Tatera indica) were collected by live-trap from different localities of Eastern Border of Iran. Specimens were collected among 3 populations from Torbat-e-Jam, Sistan and Chabahar with North longitude 60°-61.5° and East latitude 25.50°-35.50°. At first, external and cranial characters were measured and then ratio of measured characters to head and body length were calculated. It showed that there are differences in characters of Indian gerbils in various latitudes while ratio of measured characters to head and body length were compared between these 3 populations. These differences are more obvious in Chabahar so that 16 from 23 characters are significantly higher than those in Torbat-e-Jam and Sistan and 3 characters are significantly lower than those from two other localities. Also, 4 characters have no significant difference in these populations. The result of MANCOVA showed that there are no significant differences between sexes. This study tries to shed some more light on the effect of climate changes and height on morphometric changes of Indian gerbil in Eastern border of Iran.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
A. Khajeh and J. Meshkani, 2010. A Study of Intraspecies Variations of Indian Gerbil, Tatera indica Hardwicke, 1807 (Muridae, Rodentia) in Eastern Border of Iran. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 13: 59-65.

Keywords: Indian Gerbil, Eastern border of Iran, Taftan`s mountains, morphometric analysis and Tatera indica

INTRODUCTION

Indian Gerbil is a night-active animal. This animal often lives near farms beside human as social, but lives in its nest as individual (Corbet and Hill, 1991; Kam et al., 1997; Vaughn et al., 2000). Indian Gerbil is from those species that has penetrated to Iran very much. Its specimen type is reported from North of India (Wilson and Reeder, 1993; Wilson and Cole, 2000). Internationally, it is dispersed in Syria, Iraq, Kuwait, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka and South of Nepal (Alderton, 1996; Harrison and Bates, 1991; Prater, 1971; Roberts, 1977; Wilson and Reeder, 1993). It seems that height is one of the important living factors for this animal with regard to its dispersion. This species is more adaptable than other desert and wild rats (Goyal and Ghosh, 1993; Nowak and Paradiso, 1983; Prakash and Gosh, 1975; Roberts, 1977). Indian Gerbil is dispensed throughout South of Iran from sea level to 1370 m height (Douglas, 1967; Misonne, 1959) (Fig. 1a, b). Climates and diets are important factors that can affect on adaptations of Rodents in different habitats (Kerley and Whitford, 1994; Michaux et al., 2006). There are some studies that report intraspecies variations of Indian Gerbil in different populations (Mumtaz, 1989; Rana et al., 1970; Kumar and Khan, 1977). In this study, we investigated the effect of climate changes and height on morphometric changes of Indian Gerbil in 3 habitats on Eastern Border of Iran. These habitats situated on same geographical longitude with various geographical latitudes and are some different by climatic and height changes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study 3 localities were considered for sampling on Eastern border of Iran. From April 2008 to Augest 2009, 3 or 4 zone was determined in each locality for trapping with the following specifications:

First locality was Torbat-e-Jam Township in Eastern longitude 60°46’-61°0’ and Northern latitude 35°7’-35°47’ with height 940-1649 m. Annual temperature of this locality is -13°C-+40°C and its average precipitation is 254 mm. Second locality is Sistan and Zabol Township in Eastern longitude 60°2’-61°21’ and Northern latitude 30°15’-30°55’ with height 480-1200 m. Annual temperature of this locality is -9.5°C-+49°C and its average precipitation is 63.2 mm. Third locality is Chabahar Township in Eastern longitude 60°23’-61°32’ and Northern latitude 25°13’-25°29’ with height 7-200 m. Annual temperature of this locality is +10°C-+34°C and its average precipitation is 180 mm (Khajeh and Darvish, 2002) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 1: (a, b) Map of Tatera indica distribution

Fig. 2: Recorded localities of Indian Gerbil from Eastern border of Iran

Fig. 3:Head, body and tale of Tatera indica (Ashrafzadeh et al., 2007)

Sampling and study method: In each locality, farms and gardens near villages were considered for sampling. Sixty large Have-a-Heart traps with dimensions 65×18×18 cm and small Have-a-Heart traps with dimensions 45×13×13 cm were used for sampling (Ashrafzadeh et al., 2008; Momenzadeh et al., 2001). The traps were baited before sunset and were placed at animal’s paths and then they were controlled the next day (Deblase and Martin, 1975; Cunningham and Moors, 1987; Cole, 2003). Often puffy snacks, dates, oil bread and potatoes were used for baits (Khajeh and Darvish, 2002).

Specimen identification: After sampling, hunted specimens were identified by valid keys and then adult specimens were separated by dental patterns (Etemad, 1978; Corbet, 1978; Harrison and Bates, 1991).

External characters are: (1) Body Length (BL), (2) Tail Length (TL), (3) Foot Length (FL), (4) Ear Length (EL), (5) Weight (W) (Ashrafzadeh et al., 2007) (Fig. 3).

Cranial characters are: (1) Occipitonasal Length (OL), (2) Condilobasal Length (CL), (3) Zygomatic Width (ZW), (4) Least interorbital Width (LW), (5) Cranial Width (CW), (6) Length of Nasal (LN), (7) Length of Diastema (LD), (8) Length of anterior Palatine Foramina (LPF), (9) Length of Tympanic Bullae (LTB), (10) Width of Tympanic Bullae (WTB), (11) Upper Cheekteeth (UCH), (12) Lower Cheekteeth (LCH), (13) Height of Skull (HS), (14) Width of Rostrum (WR), (15) Length of Mandibule (LM), (16) Auditory Meatus Diameter (AMD), (17) Palatine Width (PW), (18) Diameter of Orbital (DO) (Ashrafzadeh et al., 2007) (Fig. 4).

Up to 0.1 mm for external characters and up to 0.01 mm for cranial characters were measured by digital caliper with precision of 0.05 mm (Mirshamsi et al., 2007). After measuring their external and cranial characters, data was analyzed using the SPSS software. In order to determine the differences between sexes, the data were tested with multivariate covariance analysis (MANCOVA) with CBL as covariate for cranial variables as covariate using GLM procedure of SPSS. In this procedure the effects of covariates with factor (sex) can be included.

Fig. 4: Skull of Tatera indica (Ashrafzadeh et al., 2007)

The results of MANCOVA revealed that there are no significant differences between sexes (Wilk’s lambda = 0.642; p = 0.88). Therefore, specimens of both sexes were combined in subsequent analysis. Significance was tested using one-way ANOVA followed by a Duncan test. Differences were considered significant when the p-value was <0.05.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In addition 93 specimens (Torbat-e-Jam: 41 S., Sistan: 28 S., Chabahar: 24 S.) were collected from Eastern border of Iran. In the first step, descriptive statistics were calculated for characters. These data show that in Chabahar population all averages of characters are greater from other populations in Torbat-e-Jam and Sistan (Table 1).

To obtain a scientific relation for measured characters and their comparison in different populations, ratio of size of all characters proportional to head and body was calculated, namely, size of each character was divided by head and body length. Descriptive statistics for these ratios are shown in Table 2.

Relationship of these characters was obtained by one-way ANOVA and Duncan Test. The results show that there are significant differences for morphometric characters between Chabahar population with Torbat-e-Jam and Sistan populations, but Torbat-e-Jam and Sistan populations are not significantly different in these characters. In regard to Table 1, it is indicated that average of all characters in Chabahar is greater than those two others. Also, the average body of population in Chabahar is greater than that the two others.

Table 1: Descriptive statistics for 23 characters (mm) of adult Indian Gerbils

Table 2: Descriptive statistics for ratio of measured characters to head and body length of adult Indian Gerbils

There is no significant difference for HBL between populations of Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam but there is significant difference in HBL between Chabahar population and two others. This shows that average body length increase toward Chabahar population (Fig. 5).

Due to body length of specimens has a direct effect on data, ratio of measured characters to head and body length were calculated to obtain scientific results (Table 2). In this step, ratio of characters to head and body length were compared by one-way ANOVA and Duncan tests between 3 populations. The results show that there are no significant differences for LW/HBL, TL/HBL and CL/HBL ratios. For AMD/HBL ratio, Sistan and Chabahar settle in one group and Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam settle in another group. This ratio increases from Torbat-e-Jam toward Sistan and Chabahar.

Fig. 5:
Comparison of body length (mm) of Indian Gerbils in 3 populations analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Duncan test. The average body of population in Chabahar is greater than the two others. There is no significant difference for HBL between populations of Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam but there is significant difference in HBL between Chabahar population and two others. This shows that average body length increase toward Chabahar population. Average plus standard deviation from three independent sets of experiments are expressed (*p<0.05)

Also, there are significant differences between Chabahar population and two others in 19 ratios: W/HBL, UCH/HBL, WTB/HBL, LTB/HBL, LD/HBL, CW/HBL, ZW/HBL, OL/HBL, EL/HBL, DO/HBL, PW/HBL, LM/HBL, WR/HBL, HS/HBL and LCH/HBL with decreasing trend toward Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam and ratios: LPF/HBL, LN/HBL and HFL/HBL with increasing trend toward Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam (Fig. 6, 7).

We expected to see equal ratios in division of size characters to head and body length between 3 populations, but it was not so and body of Indian Gerbils of Chabahar were rather larger than those of Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam specimens. Therefore, there are morphometric differences between these 3 populations.

In comparison with the results of Geno Biosphere Reserve in South of Iran (Ashrafzadeh et al., 2007), these results show that bodies average of Chabahar specimens are greater, but populations of Torbat-e-Jam and Sistan are equal or smaller than Geno Biosphere Reserve. Meanwhile, these results compare with similar report (Yigit et al., 2001) shows that specimens of Turkey are greater than hunted specimens from Iran for head and body length.

This study was done in Eastern border of Iran in an equal longitude but different latitudes. As it is apparent, latitude has a large effect on temperature and climate conditions, so that sun radiation angle increases and temperature decreases by increment of latitude.

Fig. 6:
Comparison of ration of External characters (mm) of Indian Gerbils in 3 populations analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Duncan test. There are significant differences between Chabahar population and two others in ratio of external characters. There is no significant difference for TL/HBL ratio but there are significant differences between Chabahar population and two others ratio of W/HBL and EL/HBL with decreasing trend toward Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam and ratio of HFL/HBL with increasing trend toward Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam. Average plus standard deviation from three independent sets of experiments are expressed (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001)

When we go toward Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam from Chabahar, latitude will increase by 5 degrees. Higher temperature and inadequacy of surface water in Chabahar have produces dry climate, so plant density is low. Also, in Torbat-e-Jam, temperature decrement and plant diversity is higher than Sistan. Therefore, there are apparent differences in plant densities, climates and heights of these 3 localities, which is important for our discussion and conclusion.

While studying habitats of these 3 populations, we observed that there are flat plains between Torbat-e-Jam and Sistan, which is related to these two populations. So, there are more morphological and morphometric similarities between them. But, Chabahar has a characteristic that distinguishes it from the others. One of them is Taftan's mountains which are tall and long that separated Southern populations from Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam regions. From the other hand, special climate of Chabahar has opposed limitations for dispersal of animals, so that this place has weak plant density and low surface waters even if it is adjacent to sea. Rather, relative moisture is high so that some plants supply their required water from this moisture. Thus, there are apparent differences in morphometric characters of these localities.

Fig. 7:
Comparison of ration of cranial characters (mm) of Indian Gerbils in 3 populations analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by a Duncan test. There are significant differences between Chabahar population and two others in ratio of cranial characters. There are no significant differences for LW/HBL and CL/HBL ratios but there are significant differences between Chabahar population and two others ratio of UCH/HBL, WTB/HBL, LTB/HBL, LD/HBL, CW/HBL, ZW/HBL, OL/HBL, DO/HBL, PW/HBL, LM/HBL, WR/HBL, HS/HBL and LCH/HBL with decreasing trend toward Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam and ratio of LPF/HBL, LN/HBL and HFL/HBL with increasing trend toward Sistan and Torbat-e-Jam. Average plus standard deviation from three independent sets of experiments are expressed (*p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001)

Many factors affect on this matter including different diets, various hunters and special climates (Kerley and Whitford, 1994; Michaux et al., 2006; Mumtaz, 1989; Rana et al., 1970; Shenbrot et al., 1999; Kumar and Khan, 1977).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors gratefully thank Research part of Sistan and Baluchestan University, Zahedan, Iran, for its financial assistance under project No. 88005. We also thank Dr. A. Roohi for data analysis and his constructive suggestions to improve the presentation of project.

REFERENCES

  • Alderton, D., 1996. Rodents of the World. Blandford Publishers, New York


  • Ashrafzadeh, M.R., M. Karami and J. Darvish, 2008. Comparison of suitability of live traps in rodents sampling. Biol. Magazine, 20: 493-500.


  • Ashrafzadeh, M.R., M. Karami and J. Darvish, 2007. A morphological and morphometric study of Gerbilinae subfamily in geno biosphere reserve, hormozgan. Biol. Magazine, 20: 110-120.


  • Corbet, G.B. and J.E. Hill, 1991. A World List of Mammalian Species. 3rd Edn., Oxford University Press, USA., ISBN-10: 0198540175
    Direct Link    


  • Corbet, G.B., 1978. The Mammals of the Palaearctic Region: A Taxonomic Review. Cornell University Press, London, Pages: 314


  • Cunningham, D.M. and P.J. Moors, 1987. A guide to the identification and collection of Newzealand rodents. Occasinal Publication No. 4. N. Z. Wildlife Service, Depertement of Internal Affairs, Wellington. http://csl.doc.govt.nz/upload/documents/science-and-technical/rodent-identification.pdf.


  • Deblase, A.F. and R.E. Martin, 1975. A Manual of Mammalogy. WMC. Brown Co., Dubuque, Iowa, pp: 329


  • Douglas, M.L., 1967. A study of the mammals of Iran: Resulting from the street expedition of 1962-63. Fieldiana Zool., 54: 1-282.


  • Goyal, S.P. and P.K. Ghosh, 1993. Burrow structure of 2 gerbil species of thar desert, India. Acta Theriol., 38: 453-456.
    Direct Link    


  • Harrison, D.L. and P.J.J. Bates, 1991. The Mammals of Arabia. 2nd Edn., Harrison Zoological Museum, England, ISBN: 0951731300, Pages: 345


  • Kam, M., I.S. Khokhlova and A.A. Degen, 1997. Granivory and plant selection by desert gerbils of different body size. Ecology, 78: 2218-2229.
    Direct Link    


  • Kerley, G.I.H. and W.G. Whitford, 1994. Desert-dwelling small mammals as granivores intercontinental variations. Aust. J. Zool., 42: 543-555.
    CrossRef    


  • Khajeh, A. and J. Darvish, 2002. Chewer fauna in sistan region. Master Thesis, University of Ferdowsi, Mashad, Iran.


  • Michaux, J., P. Chevrett and S. Renaud, 2006. Morphological diversity of Old World rats and mice (Rodentia, Muridae) mandible in relation with phylogeny and adaptation. J. Zool. Systematics Evolutionary Res., 45: 263-279.
    Direct Link    


  • Mirshamsi, O., J. Darvish and N. Kayvanfar, 2007. A preliminary study on Indian Gerbils, Tatera indica Hardwicke, 1807 at population level in eastern and southern parts of Iran (Rodentia: Muridae). Iranian J. Anim. Biosystematics, l3: 49-61.
    Direct Link    


  • Misonne, X., 1959. Analyse zoogeography des mammiferes de l'Iran. Bruxelles: Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Memoires Fasc. 59 (2. ser.), pp: 156.


  • Momenzadeh, M., J. Darvish, F. Tutunian and M. Sarmad, 2001. A study for ages of Iranian and Libyan Gerds and its relation with cranial characters. Proceedings of the 10th Conference of Iran Biology, University of Shiraz.


  • Mumtaz, A., 1989. Seasonal and age specific variations in body weight and cranial measurements of Indian gerbille (Tatera indica). UAF., pp: 86


  • Nowak, R.M. and J.L. Paradiso, 1983. Walker's Mammals of the World. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore and London


  • Prater, S.H., 1971. The Book of Indian Animals. Bombay Natural History Society and Oxford University Press, Mumbai, pp: 324-328


  • Rana, B.D., I. Prakash and A.P. Jain, 1970. Morphological variation in Tatera indica indica Hardwicke, 1807, inhabiting two types of Indian desert habitats. Acta Theriol., 15: 459-464.
    Direct Link    


  • Roberts, T.J., 1977. The Mammals of Pakistan. Ernest Benn Ltd., London, pp: 361


  • Cole, F.R., 2003. A recent survey of methods for closed population of small mammals. Unpublished Disseration to STATS776 Animal Abundance Course (A), University of Auckland, Auckland, pp: 38.


  • Shenbrot, G., B. Krasnov and K. Rogovin, 1999. Spatial Ecology of Desert Rodent Communities. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp: 295


  • Wilson, D.E. and F.R. Cole, 2000. Common Names of Mammals of the World. Smithsonian Institiution Press, Washangton and London, pp: 204


  • Wilson, D.E. and M. Reader, 1993. Mammal Species of the World. 2nd Edn., Smithsonian Institiution Press, Washangton and London, pp: 1207


  • Kumar, P.V. and J.A. Khan, 1977. Food preferences of the gerbil, Tatera indica indica Hardwicke. Zool. J. Linnean Soc., 64: 51-58.


  • Vaughn, T., J. Ryan and N. Czaplewski, 2000. Mammalogy. 4th Edn., Saunders College Publishing, Pennsylvania


  • Yigit, N., E. Colak, R. Verimli, S. Ozkurt and M. Sozen, 2001. A study on the distribution morphology and karyology of Tatera indica (Hardwicke, 1807) (Mammalia: Rodentia) in Turkey. Turk. J. Zool., 25: 65-70.
    Direct Link    


  • Etemad, A., 1978. Mammals of Iran, Rodents and Identification Key. Vol. 1, Natural Resource Protection and Human Environment Association Press, Tehran


  • Prakash, L. and P. Gosh, 1975. Rodents in Desert Environments. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Netherlands

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved