HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2008 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 12 | Page No.: 1530-1540
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2008.1530.1540
Different Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilizer Treatments on Some Agro-Physiologic Traits in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.)
Mashallah Daneshvar, Zeinalaabdine Tahmasebi Sarvestani and Seyed Ali Mohammad Modarres Sanavy

Abstract: In order to investigate the effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on agronomical and physiological traits of two winter rapeseed varieties, an experiment was established in a randomized complete block design as split-plot factorial arrangement with four replications in 2005-2006 at Agricultural Research Station of Khorramabad, Iran. Irrigation as main-plot factor consisted of four levels (I60, I90, I120 and I150). Sub-plot factors included nitrogen in four levels (N0, N70, N140 and N210 kg N ha-1) and two varieties (Zarfam and SLM046). Thousand-seed weight (TSW) in all irrigation and nitrogen levels was lower in the 2006 than that of the 2005. Seed oil percentage (SOP) was decreased with increasing water use only in second year. As nitrogen rate increased, SOP decreased and seed oil yield (SOY) increased in the 2006 significantly (p<0.05). With increasing water supply, SOY increased in first year. Zarfam variety had a higher TSW and SOP in both years. According to combined analysis results, seed and oil yield were not significantly affected by irrigation treatments and rapeseed varieties. Seed yield had not significant difference between 70 to 210 kg N ha-1 treatments. Both Water Use Efficiency (WUE) and dry matter remobilization efficiency (DMRE) were increased by decreasing water supply in I90 to I150 treatments. But N0 and N210 resulted in the lowest WUE and DMRE, respectively. Considering all traits, the first year of experiment was better than second year. The irrigation x variety interaction had a significant (p<0.01) effect on seed yield and WUE. Generally, I150N70V1 combination is recommended in the region of the study due to high performance in production of seed and oil yield.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Mashallah Daneshvar, Zeinalaabdine Tahmasebi Sarvestani and Seyed Ali Mohammad Modarres Sanavy, 2008. Different Irrigation and Nitrogen Fertilizer Treatments on Some Agro-Physiologic Traits in Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11: 1530-1540.

Keywords: Irrigation, nitrogen, rapeseed, variety, seed and oil yield

INTRODUCTION

Oilseed crops are important crop plants for human nutrition as well as livestock feeds. Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) has some appropriate agricultural characteristics such as cultivation under different seasons, rotation with cereals and high oil quality (Starner et al., 1996). It is the second edible oil resource in the world (Raymer, 2002) and has not only 40-45% seed oil (Sovero, 1993) but also the lowest saturated fatty acids (5-8%) among all oilseed crops (Sovero, 1993; Starner et al., 1996). To increase the rapeseed yield, increasing the yield per unit area by using agricultural inputs (irrigation, fertilizers and certified seeds) are recommended and to achieve such a goal, proper agronomic management should be taken into account. For instance, water and fertilizer are major crop growth and yield limiting factors. Iran is located in arid and semiarid part of the world and therefore has limited water resources; since a huge amount of water resources are consumed in agriculture, conducting every measure to save water for agricultural sector will effectively help to increase the agricultural products. The soil of most regions in Iran is characterized by low organic matter. As results, nitrogen deficiency often occurs in plants. This deficiency can be solved by using nitrogen fertilizers. Nitrogen plays an important role in agricultural production. Although it is important to develop water saving strategies (increasing water use efficiency), efficient nitrogen use should be considered. Poma et al. (1999) reported that in both years of study, rapeseed yield was decreased from optimum soil moisture conditions to the stressed one. They also showed that in limited conditions, rapeseed limits its reproductive organs number of seeds/silique and number of siliques/plant with significant thousand-seed weight reduction. Banuelos et al. (2002) showed that leaf/shoot ratio and biomass were increased with increasing the amount of water used in irrigation and the maximum biomass was obtained with using 297 and 359 mm irrigation treatments.

Dadivar et al. (2003) in study including four irrigation regimes (50, 75, 100 and 125 mm) on okapi rapeseed variety reported that the highest yield was obtained with T50 which did not show any statistical difference with T75 treatment. Moreover, there were no significant difference(s) for oil percentage among different treatments. However, 46.98 and 45.91% oil percentage were obtained with T50 and T125 treatments, respectively. According to Goosheh et al. (2006) report, the best interval of rapeseed irrigation was 75 mm cumulative evaporation from class A evaporation pan, in south of Khouzestan Province, South of Iran. The average depth of irrigation water at every irrigation time was calculated 60 mm. They noted that water use of rapeseed was about 350 to 400 mm per 1.5-2 t ha-1 grain yields. Investigation of rapeseed variety and water stress interactions showed that with using 100 mm water based on evaporation pan and with two times irrigation including from beginning of rapid stem growth to seed maturation, the highest seed yield (SY) was obtained with Shiralli and Orieka varieties and these varieties showed a good adaptation to water deficit (Dehshiri et al., 2001). The results of morphological and physiological measurements by Gunasekera et al. (2004) showed that dry matter production of mustard (Brassica juncea L.) was higher than that of canola under sever water stress. These researches reported that this difference was related to superior osmotic adjustment and leaf water potential of mustard. In this trial, poor ability of mustard to convert its dry matter into seed yield (low harvest index) was related to the lower seed yield in mustard when compared with canola under post-flowering water stress.

Nitrogen is a very important factor to achieve optimum yield in rapeseed and high rates of nitrogen doses regarded as a nitrogen-demanding crop (Kimber and McGregor, 1995). High yield and low NO3 leaching are compatible goals and can be achieved by appropriate irrigation and fertilizer management (Pang et al., 1997). Application of nitrogen fertilizer at rates higher than the optimum requirement for crop production may cause an increase in nitrate accumulation below the root zone and pose a rise of nitrate leaching (Kage et al., 2003). Field irrigation is not only essential for plant water supply, but it influences soil fertility. When soil moisture is sufficient (and plant is not stressed), utilization of inorganic fertilizers to provide soil nutrient elements can increase the yield. Many factors influence the crop plants nutrition needs such as water, variety type and interactions of factors. One of these important factors is the amount of water. Under low irrigation of a crop and during growth season, plant is stressed at different intensities. Such stress, changes the plant response to utilization of inorganic fertilizers. Some studies evaluated the effect of water and nitrogen on rapeseed yield (Abdel Gawad et al., 1990; Shekari, 2000; Ozer, 2003; Gunasekera, 2004). But little studies have been considered interaction of water and nitrogen on agronomical and physiological traits in different rapeseed varieties (Poma et al., 1999; Daneshmand et al., 2007). Nitrogen is one of the most important nutrients for rapeseed growth (Bybordi and Malakouti, 2002). Ozer (2003) reported that nitrogen application 160 kg ha-1 was sufficient for fertilizer requirement in rapeseed crop. Jackson (2000) and Bybordi and Malakouti (2002) showed that with increasing amount of nitrogen, rapeseed seed yield increased, but seed oil percentage was decreased. Thus, application of 200 kg ha-1 of nitrogen for the highest seed oil yield was recommended. Daneshmand et al. (2007) reported that in drought stress conditions, those rapeseed varieties were able to maintain their relative water content at high levels, had higher leaf area index and seed yield. This study was aimed at evaluating effects of different rates of water and nitrogen (60, 90, 120 and 150 mm accumulative evaporation from the evaporation pan) and nitrogen (0, 70, 140 and 210 kg N ha-1) and their interactions on some agronomical and physiological characters of two rapeseed varieties (Zarfam and SLM046) in Khorramabad Conditions, Iran.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This experiment was conducted at the Agricultural Research Station of Khorramabad (48° 21` E 33° 29` N, asl 1170 m) in a randomized complete block design as split-plot factorial arrangement with four replications during the 2005 and 2006, Khorramabad Iran. Annual mean temperature is 17.3°C at experimental region (Anonymous, 2006). The climate of region of studied is semi-arid that has relatively hot and dry summers, according to the Koppen Climate Classification System. Total precipitation in the 2005 and 2006 growing seasons was 456.6 and 658.4 mm, respectively. This range was 56.4 and 145.4 mm lower than long-term average of precipitation for experimental region (513 mm), respectively. In the 2005, total water use (irrigation plus effective rainfall) over 240 days of rapeseed growth period, for treatments I60, I90, I120 and I150 was 581.2, 517.3, 434.7 and 346.8 mm and in the 2006 it was 610.7, 560.3, 493.2 and 451.6 mm, respectively. Total evaporation from Class A evaporation pan was 1770.0 and 1608.2 mm in the 2005 and 2006, respectively. Soil samples were collected at various soil depths (0 to 60 cm) and were sent to soil test laboratories for soil phsico-chemical analysis. Results of soil analysis are shown in Table 1.

Treatments included three factors: irrigation, nitrogen and variety. Irrigation as main-plot factor consisted of four levels, (I60 (control), I90, I120 and I150) mm accumulative evaporation from the evaporation pan. Sub-plot factors included nitrogen fertilizer and rapeseed varieties. Nitrogen fertilizer treatments were applied as 0, 70, 140 and 210 kg N ha-1 (as N0, N70, N140 and N210). Experimental

Table 1: Results of the soil analysis

materials are the Zarfam (V1) and the SLM046 (V2) cultivars. At each fertilizer treatment, 1/3 of total rate (applied as Urea, 46% N) was applied at sowing time (as starter fertilizer) and the rest was applied at the end of rosette stage and at the beginning of flower bud formation. Phosphorus was applied based on soil analysis and recommended rate for rapeseed (Khademi et al., 1999). Land preparation, fertilizer application and weed control operations (with Trifluralin at 1.5 L ha-1 pre plant incorporated) all were conducted during early August and rapeseed was sown on 2nd October. Plots were 6x2.4 m and included 8 planting rows. Row spacing was 30 cm and seeds were sown on depth of 2 cm. Soil samples were collected from the 60 cm depth and their weight moisture was measured in laboratory. Water use at each irrigation interval (d in cm) was determined based on pre-irrigation soil moisture (θi) and depth of root expansion (D in cm) according to the following equation (Cuenca, 1989).

In this equation, θFC and �?b represent for soil moisture percentage by weight at field capacity (25.3% for sampled soil) and soil bulk density in g cm-3 (1.4 g cm-3 for sampled soil), respectively. Then, volume of irrigation water (m3 ha-1) was calculated by the equation, V = (d/100)10000 m2. Determined irrigation volumes with this method, were delivered to the plots by irrigation counter and pump. Seed yield (SY) was calculated from 4.8 m2 area in each plot. Yield components and number of secondary branches were also determined. Dry matter remobilization efficiency (DMRE) was determined by the method of Blum et al. (1989). Shoot dry matter was determined after oven drying at 70°C for 48 h (Kramer and Boyer, 1995). Seed oil percentage (SOP) was determined by using Inframatic 8620 instrument, which functions based on infrared spectrometry (Ludwiga et al., 2006). Results of first and second years including three heterogeneous variables (thousand-seed weight (Bartlett`s test), oil percentage (Bartlett`s test) and seed oil yield (Bartlett`s test) are discussed at Table 2-5. All statistical analyses were done using the SAS software version 8.02 (SAS Institute Inc., 1996). Combined analysis of variance was conducted after Bartlett`s test for homogeneity of variance. Combined analysis of variance was conducted for seed yield, number of secondary branches per plant, water use efficiency and dry matter remobilization efficiency. Duncan`s Multiple Range Test was used for mean separation with a significance level of 5% (Gomes and Gomes, 1984).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Interactions of the factors were found significant for the thousand-seed weight and oil yield in the 2006, but not in the 2005 (Table 2). Therefore, we have discussed main effects for the 2005 and the interactions for the 2006. Moreover, interaction of irrigationxnitrogenxvariety had a significant effect on seed oil in the 2005 and the 2006 (Table 2).

Thousand-seed weight (TSW)(g): Effect of irrigation on TSW was significant in the 2006 (p<0.05), but not in the 2005 (Table 2). TSW in all irrigation and nitrogen levels was lower in the 2006 than that in the 2005. Moreover, number of pods and number of seeds per pod were lower in the 2006 than that of 2005 (data not shown). Water and nutrients stresses, hamper flowering or reduce probability of developing flower to pod and occurring during pod formation will result in pod abortion (Kimber and McGregor, 1995). Generally, in present study there was a compensatory relationship between yield components in both years. This compensatory mechanism between rapeseed yield components has been reported by others (Mingeau, 1974; Kimber and McGregor, 1995). Nitrogen had a significant effect on TSW in the 2005 (p<0.05), but not in 2006 (Table 2). The lowest TSW was obtained in 210 kg N ha-1. TSW decreased significantly as nitrogen rate increased from 140 to 210 kg ha-1 (law of diminishing return) (Table 3). It seems that rapeseed could not absorb this rate of nitrogen efficiently, so its nitrogen absorption efficiency was lower (Kimber and McGregor, 1995). Variety had a significant effect on TSW in the 2005 (p<0.01), but not in the 2006 (Table 2). Zarfam had higher TSW than SLM046 and produced heavier grains (Table 3). Irrigationxvariety interaction had a significant (p<0.05) effect TSW in the 2006 (Table 4). Moreover, at both I60 and I120 irrigation treatments, Zarfam variety showed a significant performance in comparison to SLM046. Besides, there was no significant difference between two varieties at the two irrigation levels. I120V1 and I150V2 showed the highest (3.78 g) and the lowest (2.90 g) TSW, respectively (Table 4).


Table 2: Analysis of variance for TSW, SOP and SOY characters of varieties in the 2005 and 2006
*,**Significant at 5 and 1%, respectively, ns: Not significant


Table 3: Mean comparison (main effects) of irrigation, nitrogen and variety on TSW and SOY in the 2005
In each column means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different, based on Duncan`s test at p<=0.05

Table 4: Interaction of irrigationxvariety on SOP (in the 2005), TSW and SOY (in the 2006)
n each column means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different, based on Duncan`s test at p<=0.05

Seed oil percentage (SOP) (%): Three way interaction (irrigationxnitrogenxvariety) had a significant effect on SOP in both 2005 (p<0.05) and 2006 (p<0.01) years (Table 2). I60N0V1 with 46.80 in the 2005 and I90N0V1 with 43.20 in the 2006 had maximum SOP. I150N210V2 with 41.12 in the 2005 and I60N210V2 with 39.70 in the 2006 had the minimum SOP (Table 5). The result of irrigationxnitrogenxvariety interaction on SOP showed that in both Zarfam and SLM046 varieties in all irrigation levels, the highest SOP was obtained from no nitrogen application and SOP decreased with nitrogen application (Table 5). These result are similar to the result of

Table 5: Interaction of irrigation, nitrogen and variety on SOP in the 2005 and 2006
In each column means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different, based on Duncan`s test at p<=0.05

Smith et al. (1988), Kimber and McGregor (1995), Jackson (2000) and Bybordi and Malakouti (2002). Results of seed SOP as effected by three way interaction (irrigationxnitrogenxvariety) in the 2006 showed that SOP was increased due to the increasing irrigation intervals (from I60 to I150) (Table 5), which was similar to result of Thompson (1978). But, Smith et al. (1988) reported that SOP increased with increasing soil water content and decreased with increasing nitrogen level. In most combinations of irrigation and nitrogen in the 2005 and

Table 6: Combined analysis of variance for SY, NSB, WUE and DMRE
* and ** Significant at 5 and 1%, respectively and ns not significant

Table 7: Mean comparisons of the years on measured characters
In each column means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different, based on Duncan`s test at p<=0.05

2006, Zarfam showed higher SOP than SLM046. SOP of two varieties was significantly different in both years, which was higher in Zarfam. Also, oil percentage was less in 2006 than that in the 2005 (Table 7).

Seed oil yield (SOY) (kg ha-1): Effect of irrigation on SOY was significant in the 2005 (p<0.05), but not in the 2006 (Table 2). Results of mean comparison showed that with increasing water use, SOY increased (Table 3). Kajdi (1994) and Shekari (2000) reported that with increasing water supply, rapeseed SOY increased. The highest SOY in the 2005 was obtained from I60 and I90 irrigation treatments, which were significantly different from I150 (severe water-limited level) (Table 3). Although nitrogen had no a significant effect on SOY in both years (Table 2), but mean comparison showed that the lowest SOY was obtained when no nitrogen fertilizer (N0) was added to the soil and SOY was increased by increasing nitrogen application in the 2006 (data not shown). Nitrogen application to N140 level increased SOY, but increasing nitrogen rate from 140 to 210 kg ha-1 decreased SOY significantly in the 2005 (Table 3). According to the significant correlation between SOY and SY (0.89**), it can be concluded that lower SOY in N210 treatment is due to the decreasing SY in this nitrogen level.

Irrigation and nitrogen interaction on SOY was significant in the 2006 (p<0.05) (Fig. 1). Multiple Duncan`s range test showed that every I60 and I120 level had significant effect on SOY in some all nitrogen levels. In

Fig. 1: Interaction of irrigation and nitrogen on oil yield in the 2006

contrast, every I90 and I150 level had no significant effect on SOY in all nitrogen levels. The final results showed that the highest (1199.74 kg ha-1) and the lowest (872.21 kg ha-1) SOY was obtained from I160N210 and I120N0, respectively (Fig. 1).

Variety had a significant effect on SOY in both years (p<0.01) (Table 2). Zarfam showed higher SOY than SLM046 (Table 3), but not in the 2006. It seems that SOY variations among varieties were due to the effects of environmental variables, genotype and genotype and environment interaction on SY and SOP over the growing season. Irrigation and variety interaction had a significant effect on SOY in the 2006 (p<0.01) (Table 2). Mean analysis results revealed that two varieties had no significant difference between water deficit treatments (I90-I150) on SOY. While two varieties at I60 level showed a significant difference (Table 4). Also, the highest and the lowest SOY were belonged to I60V2 and I60V1, respectively.

COMBINED ANALYSIS

Seed yield (SY) (kg ha-1): Effect of irrigation was not significant on SY (Table 6). The relative superiority of SY in I90 irrigation interval over I60 irrigation interval can be related to its higher TSW and harvest index. Moreover, the last irrigation in treatment I60 apparently had little influence on yield, as synchronizing with the final stages of seed development and exposure to high temperatures and dry weather. Less water use efficiency in this treatment, also confirm this conclusion (Table 8). Nielsen (1997) also emphasized that drought stress during the final growth period has no important influence on rapeseed yield. SY is dependent on yield components. Considering significant effect of irrigation on TSW and, but not on number of pods and seed number per pod in this study (data not shown), it can be found that just seed weight is an important factor in adjusting SY and the two other components had little influence on SY. Reported by others, irrigation has more influence on number of seeds per pod than other yield components and water deficit will influence flowering to maturity stage more than the other growth stages (Mailer and Cornish, 1987; Mailer and Wratten, 1987). However, present results agree with those of Nielsen (1997) who reported that there were no significant differences among water stress treatments with regard to yield components in rapeseed. Results of SY showed that the lowest SY was obtained when no nitrogen fertilizer was applied and with nitrogen application increased yield (Table 8). However, there was no significant difference among treatments 70, 140 and 210 kg N ha-1. Therefore, 70 kg ha-1 nitrogen treatment is recommended from economical and bioenvironmental point of view for rapeseed in the region of the study.

Although interaction of irrigationxnitrogenxvariety (due to combined analysis) was not significant on SY and SOY characters, according to Duncan`s multiple range test, there was a significant difference (p<0.05) among different combinations of these characters. On the basis of above mentioned results, SY of I150N70V1 (3037.3 kg ha-1) and I150N70V2 (2781.3 kg ha-1) combinations were the same and located in one statistical group. Although SOY was not different between both above mentioned combinations and they were in one statistical group (1298.4 and 1156.7 kg ha-1, respectively), but I150N70V1 combination also was located in a superior statistical group. Therefore, according to oil production

Table 8: Mean comparison (main effects) of rapeseed studied traits from combined analysis
In each column means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different, based on Duncan`s test at p<=0.05

Table 9: Combined analysis of interaction of irrigationxvariety on SY and WUE
In each column means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different, based on Duncan`s test at p<=0.05

importance in rapeseed and also rate of yield, I150N70V1 combination is recommended in the region of the study. SY of two studied varieties was not significantly different (Table 8). The interaction effect of variety and year was significant (p<0.01) (Table 6), as Zarfam variety having higher SY (3259.2 kg ha-1) in 2005, while its yield (2392.6 kg ha-1) was lower than SLM046 variety in the 2006. Due to changing weather, genotype, year interaction was found highly significant. As a result, genotypes lost their stability for grain yield and two cultivars changed their rank grain yield. When genotypic stability is low, genotype can not bear environmental variation. In such a circumstance, seed yield differs yearly. The interaction effect of irrigation and variety was significant on SY (p<0.01) (Table 6), as the highest (3014.4 kg ha-1) and the lowest SY (2594.0 kg ha-1) were obtained from I60V2 and I150V2 treatments, respectively (Table 9). It can be concluded than that of the SLM046 (V2) variety reacted more quickly to soil moisture variations than Zarfam (V1) and apparently has low tolerance to drought condition. In contrast, Zarfam variety had a slow reaction to soil moisture variations and seems to have higher tolerance to drought condition. Therefore, as having higher SY in drought stress levels, especially in I150 level (Table 9) as well as relative early maturity, it seems Zarfam can be introduced as a suitable variety for cultivation in water-limited conditions. In this study, year had a significant effect on SY (p<0.01) (Table 6). Rapeseed mean SY was 3103.3 and 2558.4 kg ha-1 in the 2005 and 2006, respectively. Also, mean SOY was 1384.12 and 1046.22 kg ha-1 in the 2005 and 2006, respectively. SY and SOY were 17.5 and 24.4% higher in the 2005 than that in the 2006, respectively (Table 7). In spite of higher precipitation and its better distribution in year the 2006, probably decreasing SY and SOY in this year can be related to weather variations over the growth season (low temperature during flowering, 11.5 and 14.5°C in the April 2006 and 2005, respectively); cloudy and rainy weather in most days during April (therefore inadequate honeybee activity and less flower fertilization) and soil and nitrogen leaching due to higher precipitation in the 2006. Moreover, this yield difference can be explained by later planting date in 2006 than that in the 2005 (about 7 days).

The significance of effect of year on measured characters in the present study showed that the changes of weather from one year to another have significant effect on these characters (Table 7). Interaction of variety and year (p<0.01) and irrigation, nitrogen and year (p<0.05) were significant on SY (Table 6). Although Zarfam had a higher SY of 3259.2 kg ha-1 in the 2005, its SY in the 2006 was lower (2392.6 kg ha-1). The highest yield (3498.8 kg ha-1) was obtained from I90N210Y1 and the lowest yield (2113.7 kg ha-1) obtained from I120N0Y2, which was 1385.1 kg ha-1 lower than the first one. Present results are supported by the studies of Faraji (2004) who observed that effect of the year; variety and interaction between year and variety was significant on seed yield. Also, he noted the interaction was significant because of different temperature in two years of the experiment. Faraji and Soltani (2007) also showed that effect the year was significant on seed and oil yield. They reported that existence of good climatic condition, greater sunshine during flowering and seed formation periods resulted in seed and oil yield enhancement. Haefele et al. (2003) observed across all genotypes tested and in comparison with the irrigated control, rainfall conditions reduced grain yield of treatment without N application by 69% in 2004 and by 59% in 2005. Lewis and Thurling (1994) reported further increase in seed yield of oilseed Brassicas in experimental environment should be possible if higher postanthesis water use could be combined with lower soil evaporation and improved WUE. Al-Kaisi et al. (2003) reported that irrigationxnitrogen interaction on grain yield was significant and varied by year and also grain yield response to N rate was affected by irrigation and year. This finding agrees to present results.

Number of secondary branches per plant (NSB): Effect of irrigation and nitrogen treatments was not significant on NSB, while effect of variety and year was significant (p<0.01) (Table 6). With increasing nitrogen application, NSB increased (Table 8), as the highest (6.42) and the lowest mean NSB (6.00) obtained from 210 kg N ha-1 and no N fertilizer treatments, respectively. This result agrees with that of Abedl Gawad et al. (1990), who reported that increasing nitrogen rate in rapeseed resulted in higher NSB. Increasing nitrogen rate will increase NSB due to increasing absorption and translocation of assimilates and stimulating apical and lateral meristems to grow. The SLMO46 variety produced more NSB and there was a significant difference between two varieties (Table 8). However, producing more NSB in this variety didn`t result in higher seed yield and oil content (Table 8) (data of oil yield not shown). Despite the fact of the SLM046 had more NSB than Zarfam, their grain and oil yield was the same approximately. Moreover, considering negative significant correlation between NSB and SOP (-0.38*) and TSW (-0.55**), it seems that high NSB is not a suitable factor in rapeseed. Moreover, plant lodging occurred due to high NSB and its heavy weight during seed maturity period. In support of present study, Khan et al. (2008) reported that the relationship of branches plant-1 with seed yield was highly significant but negative. They also showed branches plant-1 had negative but non-significant association with 100 grain weight and oil content. Ali et al. (2003) observed branches plant-1 had negative but highly significant correlations with seeds pod-1. Kimber and McGregor (1995) surveyed that producing fewer basal branches and more pods on main stem and upper branches is considered to be one of the rapeseed ideotype characteristics. Present results are opposite to that of Diepenbrock (2000) who found that the number of pods per plant is decisive for seed yield. He showed that this trait is ultimately determined by the survival of branches plant-1, buds, flowers and young pods. Tunturk and Ciftci (2007) also noted were statistically positive correlation between seed yield with NSB. Effect of year (p<0.01), irrigation and year (p<0.05) and variety and year (p<0.01) was significant for NSB (Table 6). This number was higher in the 2005 than that in the 2006 (Table 7). Interaction of irrigation and year showed that the highest and fewest NSB was obtained in I90Y1 and I120Y2 treatments, respectively. Interaction of variety and year showed that SLM046 variety produced more and fewer NSB than Zarfam in the 2005 and 2006, respectively. Halvorson et al. (2001) showed that bearing branches in unit area is functional plant density, power of production of bearing branches and their survival. They also found that NSB in rapeseed closely correlated with soil moisture regime during growing season. Brassica rapa in compare to B. napus produced more NSB (Kimber and Mc-Gregor, 1995).

Water use efficiency (WUE) (kg grain mm-1 H2O): Irrigation significantly influenced WUE (p<0.01) (Table 6). WUE increased in water deficit treatments (I90 to I150), while increasing water use in control (I60) resulted in lower WUE (Table 8). Maximum rapeseed WUE values obtained in treatment which received no spring irrigation and its WUE values were decreased as increasing water use (Anonymous, 2003). Regarding WUE, Irrigation treatments I120 and I150 were in the same statistical group and each treatment I60 and I90 were placed in different statistical groups. Water use efficiency is considered to be a key indicator of plant production potential in water deficit conditions. Results of this study show that rapeseed can have high the WUE when irrigation is limited. Also, it was increased significantly as a result of nitrogen application (Table 8). Norton (1989) reported that nitrogen application increased the WUE of the rapeseed from 3 to 6 kg ha-1 mm-1. WUE of two varieties was not significantly different (Table 6). Genetic and management factors influence the crop WUE. In this experiment, genetic factor alone had no influence on WUE. Effect of irrigation and variety was significant for WUE (p<0.01) (Table 6). Results showed that the lowest WUE was belonged to Zarfam variety in I60 moisture level (the highest water use). The highest WUE also obtained in this variety, but in I150 moisture level (the lowest water use) (Table 9). So it was observed that the WUE of rapeseed increased as the drought period lengthened and vise versa. Nielsen (1997) reported that rapeseed exhibited a linear response of seed yield to water use with approximately 186 kg ha-1 of seed produced for every mm of water used. In this experiment, Zarfam variety showed another aspect of drought resistance by saving water in severe moisture level. Effect of year, irrigationxyear and varietyxyear was significant on WUE (p<0.01) (Table 6). WUE was higher in 2005 than that in 2006 (Table 7). This difference among years can be related to their difference in regard to evapotranspiration potential and atmospheric evaporative demand. I150Y1 and I60Y2 combinations showed the highest (8.31 kg grain mmx1 H2O) and the lowest (4.10) WUE, respectively. Zarfam in first year and the second year had the highest (7.37) and the lowest (4.46) WUE, respectively.

Dry matter remobilization efficiency (DMRE): Combined analysis of data revealed that generally, the DMRE increased in water limited conditions (I90 to I150 levels) as compared to I60 (no water limitation). The DMRE in three water deficit levels (I90 to I150) averaged 40.2%, which were 5.2 units higher than that in I60 level (Table 8). Increasing nitrogen availability before flowering stage and water during grain filling, decreased the DMRE in I60 level. The results are in line with those of Papakosta and Gagianas (1991) and Blum (1998), who reported that proportion of remobilized dry matter increased during drought stress conditions, as compared to optimal moisture conditions. These results agree with those Ehdaie et al. (2002) who observed that the amount of current assimilates and stem reserves contributed to grain yield was reduced, respectively, by 54 and 11% under drought. Hocking et al. (1997) also showed on basis averaged over all N treatments, about 20% of the dry matter and 60-65% of the N was apparently mobilized from the stem and leaves, after flowering. In contrast, Ercoli et al. (2008) noted although remobilization of dry matter and N was less affected by water stress than accumulation, it was not able to counter balance the reduction of assimilation and consequently it was not able to stabilize grain yield under drought.

Results of remobilization efficiency showed that increasing nitrogen application (210 kg ha-1), apparently resulted in increasing green parts of plant and their duration, so increasing current photosynthesis. Therefore, it was not needed for plant to consume its reservoirs, so remobilization had been decreased in this fertilizer level (Table 8). Overall, in present study, variety had a significant effect on DMRE (p<0.05) (Table 6). Zarfam had higher DMRE than the SLM046 (Table 8). It was previously reported that there is a distinct difference among different genotypes in regard to the rate of translocated materials to seed (Blum, 1998). Effect of year, irrigationxnitrogenxyear were significant on the DMRE (p<0.01) (Table 6). As the DMRE was 19% higher in the 2005 than that in the 2006 (Table 7). This difference between two years can be explained by mainly weather variations. I150N0Y1 and I60N210Y2 treatments had the highest and the lowest DMRE, respectively. Correlation between DMRE and TSW (0.35*) showed that the DMRE can play a role as a source in grain filling. Genotypic differences reported by Kumar et al. (2006) and Ehdaie et al. (2008) in percent contribution of stem reserves to grain yield were significant in well-watered and in drought-field conditions. But, Clark et al. (1984) reported that not observed correlation between stress tolerance index and amount of remobilization. Blum et al. (1989) and Clark et al. (1984) noted that DMRE had correlated to the crops genetic characteristic.

CONCLUSION

Under weather conditions at the time of experiments conducting, combined analysis results revealed that water-limited had not significant reduction on rapeseed grain yield as well as oil content in comparison to the control plants. Since limited irrigation treatments (I90 to I150) resulted in a higher and significant WUE values to the control plants, they can be considered to save water rapeseed production. Furthermore, the DMRE was significantly higher in comparison to the control plants. Therefore, it can be concluded that applying some controlled and purposeful drought stress during grain filling (as plant could restore its water during the night), will increase remobilization efficiency of rapeseed as a result of more translocation of stored materials from vegetative parts to seeds. But further studies are required to address this issue. Considering interaction of irrigation and variety, it seems that Zarfam had better adaptation to water-limited conditions than the SLMO46, because of the higher SY and WUE under sever water-Limited treatment (I150) and matured earlier than the SLM046.

REFERENCES

  • Abedl Gawad, A., A. El-Tabbakh and A. Shetaia, 1990. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium fertilization on the yield and yield components rape plant. Annu. Agric. Sci., 35: 279-293.


  • Al-Kaisi, M.M. and X. Yin, 2003. Effects of nitrogen rate, irrigation rate and plant population on corn yield and water use efficiency. Agron. J., 95: 1475-1482.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ali, N., F. Javidfar, J.Y. Elmira and M.Y. Mirza, 2003. Relationship among yield components and selection criteria for yield improvement in winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Pak. J. Bot., 35: 167-174.
    Direct Link    


  • Anonymous, 2003. Drought Advisory. EM 4833. http://cru.cahe. wsu. edu/CEPublications/em4833/em4833. pdf (Accession date 23.04.2008).


  • Anonymous, 2006. Lorestan province meteorological year-book. Statistic of Meterological Organization Center, Lorestan, Iran.


  • Banuelos, G.S., D.R. Bryla and C.G. Cook, 2002. Vegetative production of kenaf and canola under irrigation in central California. Ind. Crops Prod., 15: 137-145.
    CrossRef    


  • Blum, A., G. Golan, J. Mayer, B. Sinmena, L. Shpiler and J. Burra, 1989. The drought response of landraces of wheat from the Northern Negev Desert in Israel. Euphytica, 43: 87-96.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Blum, A., 1998. Improving wheat grain filling unde stress by stem reserver mobilization. Eupyhtica, 100: 77-83.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Bybordi, A. and M.J. Malakouti, 2002. The effects of rates of nitrogen and manganese on the yield and quality of two winter rapeseed varieties in Ahar region East Azarbayejan. Iran. J. Soil Water Sci., 17: 1-8.


  • Clarke, J.M., T.F., Townley-Smith, T.N. McCaig and G. Green, 1984. Growth analysis of spring wheat cultivars of varing drought resistance. Crop Sci., 24: 573-970.


  • Cuenca, R.H., 1989. Irrigation System Design-An Enginering Approach. 1st Edn., Prentice Hall Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Pages: 552


  • Dadivar, M., M. Khodshanas, J. Vaziri and G. Ghadbeglo, 2003. Effects of water stress on yield and it's components in rapeseed. Proceedings of the 8th Soil Science Congress of Iran, August 22-28, 2003, The University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran, pp: 1035-1036.


  • Daneshmand, A., A.H. Shirani-Rad and J. Daneshian, 2007. Echophysiologycal and agronomical aspects of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes as affected by soil water availability -(Agronomy Section). Proceedings of the 12th International Rapeseed Congress Sustainable Development in Cruciferous Oilseed Crops Production, March 26-30, 2007, Wuhan, China, Science Press USA Inc., pp: 244-.


  • Dehshiri, A., M.R. Ahmadi and S. Zeinalabedin Tahmasebi, 2001. Rapeseed varieties response to water stress. Iran J. Agric. Sci., 32: 649-659.


  • Diepenbrock, W., 2000. Yield analysis of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): A review. Field Crops Res., 67: 35-49.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ehdaie, B., G.A. Alloush and J.G. Waines, 2008. Genotypic variation in linear rate of grain growth and contribution of stem reserves to grain yield in wheat. Field Crops Res., 106: 34-43.
    CrossRef    


  • Faraji, A., 2004. Evolution of yield, yield components and vegetative of new genotypes of new canola in Gonabad. Seed and Plant, 19: 435-446.


  • Faraji, A. and A. Soltani, 2007. Evolution of yield and yield Seed and Plant, 23: 191-202.


  • Gomez, K.A. and A.A. Gomez, 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd Edn., John Wiley and Sons Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey, ISBN: 978-0-471-87092-0, Pages: 704
    Direct Link    


  • Goosheh, M., M. Saremi and V. Vaziri, 2006. Determination of suitable interval and depth of canola irrigation by class A evaporation pan method in south of Khouzestan province, Iran. J. Soil Water Sci., 20: 164-171.
    Direct Link    


  • Gunasekera, C.P., L.D. Martin, R.J. French and K.H.M. Siddique, 2004. Response of mustard and canola genotypes to soil moisture stress during the post-flowering period. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Crop Science Congress, 26 Sep-1 Oct, Brisbane, The Regional Institute Ltd., Queensland, Australia.
    Direct Link    


  • Haefele, S.M., S.M.A. Jabbar, J.D.L.C. Siopongco, A. Tirol-Padre, S.T. Amarante, P.C. Stacrus and W.C. Cosico, 2003. Nitrogen use efficiency in selected rice (Oryza sativa L.) genotypes under different water regimes and nitrogen levels. Field Crops Res., 107: 137-146.
    CrossRef    


  • Halvorson, A.D., B.J. Wienhold and A.L. Black, 2001. Tillage and nitrogen fertilization influence grain and soil nitrogen in an annual cropping system. Agron. J., 93: 836-841.
    Direct Link    


  • Hocking, P.J., P.J. Randall and D. DeMarco, 1997. The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertilizer: Partitioning and mobilization of dry matter and nitrogen and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crops Res., 54: 201-220.
    Direct Link    


  • Jackson, G.D., 2000. Effects of ntrogen and sulfur on canola yield and nutrient uptake. Agron. J., 92: 644-649.
    Direct Link    


  • Kage, H., C. Alt and H. Stutzel, 2003. Aspects of nitrogen use efficiency of cauliflower I. A simulation modeling based analysis nitrogen availability under field conditions. J. Agric. Sci., 141: 1-16.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Kajdi, F., 1994. Effect of irrigation on the protein and oil content seed varieties. Acta Agronomica, 36: 44-50.


  • Khademi, Z., H. Rezie, M.J. Malakouti and P. Mohajer Milani, 1999. Optimal nutrition and fertilizer recommendation for rapeseed growers in soils of Iran. M.Sc Thesis. Agricultural Research and Education Organization, Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Iran.


  • Khan, S., Farhatullah and I.H. Khalil, 2008. Phenotypic correlation analysis of elite F3:4 Brassica populations for quantitative and qualitative traits. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 3: 38-42.
    Direct Link    


  • Kimber, D.S. and D.L. McGregor, 1995. Brassica Oil Seeds: Production and Utilization. 1st Edn. CAB International, Oxon UK, pp: 394


  • Kramer, P.J. and J.S. Boyer, 1995. Water Relations of Plants and Soils. 1st Edn., Academic Press, San Diego, New York, USA., ISBN-13: 978-0-12-425060-4, pp: 491-495


  • Kumar, R., A.K. Sarawgi, C. Ramos, S.T. Amarante, A.M. Ismail and L.J. Wade, 2006. Partitioning of dry matter during drought stress in rainfed lowland rice. Field Crops Res., 98: 1-11.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lewis, G.L. and N. Thurling, 1994. Growth, development and yield of three oilseed Brassica species in a water-limited environment. Aust. J. Exp. Agric., 34: 93-103.


  • Ludwiga, B., G. Schmilewskib and T. Terhoeven-Urselmansa, 2006. Use of near infrared spectroscopy to predict chemical parameters phytotoxicity of peats and growing media. Sci. Hort., 109: 86-91.
    CrossRef    


  • Mailer, R.J. and P.S. Cornish, 1987. Effects of water stress on glucosinolate and oil concentration in the seeds of rape (Brassica napus L.) and turnip rape (Brassica rapa L. var silvestris Lam Briggs). Can. J. Plant Sci., 70: 399-407.
    Direct Link    


  • Mailer, R.J. and N. Wratten, 1987. Glucosinolate variability in rapeseed in Austmlia. Proceedings of the 7th International Rapeseed Congress, May 11-14, 1987, Poznan, Poland, pp: 661-673.


  • Mingeau, M., 1974. Comportement du colza de printemps a la secheresse. Inf. Tec. Paris, 36: 1-11.


  • Nielsen, D.C., 1997. Water use and yield of canola under dry land conditions in the Central Great Plains. J. Prod. Agric., 10: 307-313.
    Direct Link    


  • Norton, R.M., 1989. Applied nitrogen and water use efficiency of canola. Proceedings of the 7th Australian Rapeseed Agronomists and Breeders Workshop, September 12-17, 1989, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia, pp: 222-227.


  • Ozer, H., 2003. Sowing date and nitrogen rate effects on growth, yield and yield components of two summer rapeseed cultivars. Eur. J. Agron., 19: 453-463.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Pang, X.P., J. Letey and L. Wu, 1997. Irrigation quantity and uniformity and nitrogen application effects on crops yield and nitrogen leaching. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 61: 257-261.
    Direct Link    


  • Papakosta, D.K. and A.A. Gagianas, 1991. Nitrogen and dry matter accumulation, remobilization, and losses for Mediterranean wheat during grain filling. Agron. J., 83: 864-870.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Poma, I., G. Venezia and L. Gristina, 1999. Rapeseed (Brassica napus L. var Oleifera D.C.) ecophysiological and agronomical aspects as affected by soil water availability. In: Proceedings 10th International Rapeseed Congress, 27-29 September, Canberra, Australia.
    Direct Link    


  • Raymer, P.L., 2002. Canola: An Emerging Oilseed Crop. In: Trends in New Crops and New Uses, Janick, J. and A. Whipkey (Eds.). ASHS Press, Alexandira, VA., USA., pp: 122-126


  • SAS, 1996. The SAS System for Windows. Release 8.02, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.


  • Shekari, 2000. Effect of drought stress on rapeseed phonology, water relations, growth, yield and quality. Ph.D Thesis. Tabriz University, Iran.


  • Smith, C.J., G.C. Wright and M.R. Woodroofe, 1988. The effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer on rapeseed (Brassica napus) production in South-Eastern Australia. II. nitrogen accumulation and oil yield. Irrigat. Sci., 9: 15-25.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Sovero, M., 1993. Rapeseed, a New Oilseed Crop for the United States. In: Advances in New Crops, Janick, J. and J.E. Simon (Eds.). Timber Press, Portland, OR, pp: 302-307


  • Starner, E.D., H.L. Bhardwaj, A. Hamama and M. Rangappa, 1996. Canola Production in Virginia. In: Progress in New Crops, Janick, J. (Ed.). AShS Press Alexandria, VA., ISBN: 0-9615027-3-8, pp: 287-290


  • Thompson, J.A., 1978. Effect of irrigation interval and plant population on growth, yield and water use of soybeans in a semi arid environment. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. Anim. Husb., 18: 276-281.


  • Tunturk, M. and V. Ciftci, 2007. Relationships between yield and some yield components in rapeseed (Brassica napus ssp. oilefera L.) cultivars by using correlation and path analysis. Pak. J. Bot., 39: 81-84.
    Direct Link    


  • Ercoli, L., L. Lulli, M. Mariotti, A. Masoni and I. Arduini, 2008. Post-anthesis dry matter and nitrogen dynamics in durum wheat as affected by nitrogen supply and soil water availability. Eur. J. Agronomy, 28: 138-147.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved