HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2007 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 20 | Page No.: 3656-3661
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2007.3656.3661
Effects of Neem Leaf Dust and a Commercial Formulation of a Neem Compound on the Longevity, Fecundity and Ovarian Development of the Melon Fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) and the Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Mahfuza Khan, M. Aftab Hossain and M. Saidul Islam

Abstract: Neem leaf dust and a commercial formulation of neem were tested on adult Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) and Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) to determine their effects on the longevity, fecundity and ovarian development. Different combinations of neem leaf dust and a commercial formulation of a neem compound incorporated with sugar solution and adult rearing diets were tested. The Laboratory tests showed that ingestion of neem can significantly reduced the longevity and fertility of both the fly species. Significantly fewer pupae were collected from adults fed on laboratory rearing diet and nimbicidine as water source. Effect of neem treatment on the pupation and subsequent adult emergence of late-instar larvae was negligible. Microscopic observation indicated that the decreased fecundity was due to the block of ovarian development. Experimental results confirmed that neem can be effectively used as a safe alternative insecticide for the control of Bactrocera species.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Mahfuza Khan, M. Aftab Hossain and M. Saidul Islam, 2007. Effects of Neem Leaf Dust and a Commercial Formulation of a Neem Compound on the Longevity, Fecundity and Ovarian Development of the Melon Fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) and the Oriental Fruit Fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 10: 3656-3661.

Keywords: ovarian development, longevity, fecundity, Bactrocera cucurbitae, Bactrocera dorsalis and neem

INTRODUCTION

The Melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coq.) and the Oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Hendel) under the family Tephritidae are considered as economically most important pests in most of the tropical and sub-tropical areas of the world. The fly species are multivoltine with explosive reproductive capacity and disperse widely. In Hawaii 125 and 173 host plant species have been reported for B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis, respectively (Metcalf and Metcalf, 1992). While 42 host plants for B. cucurbitae and 117 for B. dorsalis in South-East Asia have been reported (Allwood et al., 1999) in addition to other alternate hosts (Uchida et al., 1990). The economic impact of fruit flies includes not only the direct loses of yield and increased cost of control, but they also seriously impede international trade because of quarantine regulations (Animal and Health Inspection Service, 1988).

The control measures adopted for the fly species mainly are contact poisons or bait traps for mature adults (McQuate et al., 2005; Vargas et al., 2003). Baits and sprays of conventional insecticides have toxic effects on non-target beneficial fauna including parasitoids of Bactrocera species. Some attention has been paid to the possibility of fly control by targeting late-instar larvae and pupae (Singh, 2003; Stark et al., 1990). Sterile Insect Techniques (SIT) have been shown to be an important component of integrated approaches to control flies under the family tephritidae (Hendrichs et al., 2002; Wong et al., 1992) and have also successfully able to eradicate the melon fly from isolated Island like, Okinawa, Japan (Koyama et al., 2004). However, because of polyandrous and long distance migratory abilities of the fly species with high population densities throughout the years SIT does not seem to be suitable for continental areas.

Neem (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) (Meliaceae) has emerged as an excellent alternative to synthetic insecticides for the management of different insect pests. Azadirachtin is an example of natural chemical defense by plants, affecting feeding primarily through chemoreception (deterrence) and secondly through toxic effects (Mordue (Luntz.) and Blackwell, 1993). As many as 540 insect including all key insect pests of agriculture have already been found to be susceptible and exhibit various behavioural and physiological effects of neem (Schmutterer and Singh, 2002). However, there are only few reports on the effect of neem extracts on tephritids (Stark et al., 1990; Stefens and Schmutterer, 1983) and also few literature are available on the post-embryonic development against B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis when fed as water source (Di Ilio et al., 1999; Singh, 2003). Therefore, to establish neem as an environmentally safe insecticide for integrated control of tephritid flies, the present investigation was undertaken to determine the effect of neem leaf dust and a commercial formulation of a neem compound on the longevity, fecundity and ovarian development of adult B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis under laboratory condition.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Adult B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis used were from established colonies maintained in the laboratory of Insect Biotechnology Division, Atomic Energy Research Establishment (AERE), Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh, for about 100 generations at 28±2°C temperature and 75±5% relative humidity.

Effects of neem leaf dust integrated diet on the longevity, fecundity and ovarian development of B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis: Fresh neem leaves were collected from AERE campus in the month of July, 2006. The leaves were then washed in tap water, freeze dried (Lab Conco., USA) and were ground in an electric blender (New Hartford, Conn., USA) to make fine powder. Aqueous extract of neem leaf was prepared by shaking weighed amounts of fresh neem leaf into beaker (1600 mL) containing distilled water for 24 h with an electric shaker and filtering through Whatman No. 1 filter paper.

Newly emerged sixty pairs of adult B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis were placed in five nylon-netted cages (25x15x15 cm) separately and supplied with: (i) control (laboratory rearing diet, autolyzed brewers yeast: sugar, 1:4), (ii) negative control (no food), (iii) only sugar solution (10%), (iv) neem leaf dust and 10% sugar solution (w/v, 5 g: 5 mL) and (v) neem leaf dust: protein-hydrolysate:sugar (1:1:2). Adult survivals in the test cages were recorded until all flies died. Three replicates were conducted for each treatment for both the fly species. On day 14, ovaries of the treated and control flies were dissected in invertebrate physiological saline water (0.7% NaCl) and micro-photographed using Nikon microscope. The length and breadth of ovary of the treated as well as control flies were measured with a micrometer. Micro-photograph of the normal ovary as well as whole reproductive organs of female B. cucurbitae is also given (Fig. 1A-E).

Effects of a commercial formulation of neem compound on the longevity, fecundity and ovarian development of B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis: Commercial formulation of a neem compound (Nimbicidine®, supplied by ACI Ltd., Dhaka, Bangladesh) was used in the present study. Required concentrations (1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 ppm) of azadirachtin (0.03% EC) were prepared by diluting into 10% sugar solution. Newly emerged fifty pairs of B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis were kept in nylon-netted cages separately and were provided with nimbicidine at a concentration of 1, 5, 10, 15 and 20 ppm as water source, via cotton wicks in conical flask. Sugar solution (10%) was served as control.

Fig. 1:
Ovaries (ov), spermatheca (sp), ovipositor (ovipos) of 14 days old female flies fed on (A) neem leaf dust and sugar solution/only nimbicidine (10 ppm), (B) sugar solution only, (C) neem leaf dust:protein-hydrolysate:sugar (1:1:2), (D) control (autolized brewers yeast:sugar 1:4) and (E) whole reproductive organs of freshly emerged Bactrocera cucurbitae

Treatments and controls were changed every 24 h to prevent contamination through cotton wicks. After 24 h number of flies died was recorded per concentration per cage. Ovaries of treated flies which survived beyond 14 days were dissected in saline water, micro-photographed and the length and breadth were measured as mentioned earlier.

In a separate experiment, eighty pairs of freshly emerged adult B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis provided with laboratory rearing diet (autolyzed brewers yeast and sugar, 1:4) and 20 ppm nimbicidine as drinking source. After 14 days 10 pairs of flies were transferred into another cage separately containing oviposition medium (sweet gourd and banana paste for B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis, respectively) for egg collection. Total five cages were maintained for both the species. After 24 h of egg collection, sweet gourd and banana paste per cage per fly species were transferred into artificial rearing medium and kept for pupation. The same procedure was repeated on day 20 to collect egg from B. cucrbitae and B. dorsalis. Mean pupation and subsequent adult emergence was recorded.

Effect of aqueous extract of neem leaf and neem compound on the pupation of B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis larvae: Previously sterilized 100 g saw dust were mixed with 100 mL nimbicidine (0.03%) and air dried properly. Ten late-instar (popping) larvae were allowed to pupate on 10 g neem treated saw dust in Petri dishes (9 cm). Sterilized 100 g saw dust were also mixed with 100 mL neem leaf extract for the same purposes. Ten replicates per treatment group for both the fly species were maintained to determine the percentage of pupation and subsequent adult emergence.

Statistical analysis: Data obtained from the present study were analysed with statistical software Minitab, version 13.2. DMRT, one way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Tukey’s pair-wise comparison test were performed.

RESULTS

Effects of neem leaf dust integrated diet on the longevity, fecundity and ovarian development of B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis: Mean longevity of adult B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis fed on neem integrated diet was significantly lower from that of control. Flies fed only 10% sugar solution had the higher longevity than the flies fed on neem leaf dust mixed sugar solution (Table 1). No flies in both the species survived up to 3/5 days with negative control (no food) under laboratory condition. Significant reduction in the longevity of both the fly species also observed when fed on neem leaf dust integrated diet (protein hydrolysate:sugar: neem leaf dust, 1:1:2) than control (autolyzed brewers yeast and sugar 1:4).

Table 1: Mean (±SE) longevity of adult B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis fed on different adult diets
Values are mean of three replications per treatment group for both the fly species, Mean in each column having different letter(s) differ significantly at 0.05% (DMRT)

The mean longevity was 41±5 and 39±2 days (Table 1) for neem leaf dust integrated diet fed B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis, respectively. Bactrocera species fed on neem leaf dust integrated diet laid eggs after 38 and 35 days which was 21-24 days away from the egg laying (14 days after adult emergence) of control flies. No flies were observed to lay egg fed on either only sugar solution or neem leaf dust mixed sugar solution.

A series of microscopic observation on the ovaries of flies fed on neem leaf dust mixed sugar solution, sugar solution only, neem leaf dust integrated diet and same day old control flies are shown in Fig. 1A-D. Ovaries of all the treated flies appeared reduced in size compared to control. The accessory glands on the contrary appeared well developed in both the treated and control flies. The length and breadth were 0.37±0.01 and 0.29±0.02 mm, 0.39±0.02 and 0.32±0.01 mm, 0.87±0.02 and 0.79±0.01 mm and 2.56±0.01 and 1.95±0.02 mm, respectively, for the neem leaf dust mixed sugar solution, sugar solution only, neem leaf dust integrated diet and same day old control flies, respectively.

Effects of a commercial formulation of neem compound on the longevity, fecundity and ovarian development of B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis: Lethal mortality of B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis were determined at 15 and 20 ppm concentration within 24 h of exposure. B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis were observed to survive up to 22 and 19 days, respectively, when supplied with 10 ppm nibmicidine. The percentage survival was 20 and 10% for B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis fed on 5 ppm concentration of nimbicidine during this period (Fig. 2). No differences were observed between 1 ppm nimbicidine fed than control for both the fly species. The micro-photograph, the length and breadth of 10 ppm nimbicidine fed flies ovary were same to that of the neem leaf dust mixed sugar solution fed flies as mentioned earlier.

Table 2: Mean (±SE) pupation and adult emergence of 10 pairs of B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis fed on protein diet and 20 ppm nimbicidine as water source at 14 and 20 days after adult emergence
Values are mean of five replications, 10 pairs per replicate, In a column mean values followed by same letter(s) do not differ significantly at 0.05% (DMRT)

Fig. 2: Percentage mortality of adult B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis after 14 days, fed on different concentrations of nimbicidine

Fig. 3: Mean (±SE) pupation and adult emergence of B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis from late-instar larvae on nimbicidine as well as neem leaf extract treated saw dust

The adult B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis supplied with protein sources (autolized brewers yeast and sugar) and 20 ppm nimbicidine as drinking source were observed to lay egg as control flies after 14 days of adult emergence. During this period, nearly 14-33% B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis, respectively, were observed died. However, the mean pupation and adult emergence were significantly lower than that of control (Table 2).

Effect of aqueous extract of neem leaf and neem compound on the pupation of B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis larvae: Aqueous extract of neem leaves and nimbicidine treated saw dust did not exert any effect on the pupation of late-instar larvae of both the Bactrocera species. Larvae were observed to escape the effect of nimbicidine and neem leaf extract mixed saw dust and formed the puparia. However, pupal duration delayed for 2 to 3 days from that of control. Mean Pupation and subsequent adult emergence are shown in Fig. 3.

DISCUSSION

The present experimental results confirmed that neem leaf dust and neem compound have significant detrimental effects on the physiology and development of B. dorsalis and B. cucurbitae. Flies fed on neem leaf dust mixed sugar solution, negative control and nimbicidine alone at 1, 5 and 10 ppm concentration were not able to produce eggs and led us hypothesize that neem may act on B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis by disrupting the function of ovarian development as reported by Di Ilio et al. (1999) in case of medfly, Ceratitis capitata (Wied). Role of azadirachtin as a compound responsible for these effects were also reported by Burkhard (1989). The author noted that azadirachtin caused a reduction in egg deposition, weight of the ovaries and free ecdysteroid in the hemolymph and the ovaries respectively, on blow fly, Phormia terraenovae (RD). Singh (2003) confirmed that neem seed kernel extract as well as pure azadirachtin at 2.0 ppm completely inhibit egg laying in B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis when fed as water source. Complete and irreversible sterility was also reported in female C. capitata by feeding azadirachtin mixed adult rearing diet (Di Ilio et al., 1999).

In insect, yolk synthesis is dependent on Juvenile Hormone (JH) and 20-OH ecdysone (Handler and Postlethwait, 1978). Azadirachtin has been reported to affect both the processes by inhibiting oogenesis and ovarian ecdysteroid synthesis (Rembold, 1988; Schulz and Schluter, 1984). Changes in hemolymph protein expression of Ostrinia furnacalis (Guenée) was also reported to be induced by azadirachtin treatment (Huang et al., 2007). In the present experiment neem leaf dust mixed sugar solution and nimbicidine feeding completely inhibit the fecundity of both the fly species. Mean pupal collection from adults fed on protein and nimbicidine fed was significantly less from that of control flies. The present observation have some similarities with the findings of Steets (1976) who noted that Colorado Potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decimlineata (Say) females fed with azadirachtin rich neem seed kernel extract for 5 days resulted reduced fecundity which was greater than 98%. However, unlike to the findings of Singh (2003), B. dorsalis seem to be more sensitive than B. cucurbitae to the tested neem compound.

The present microscopic observation also confirmed the developmental redundancy of the ovaries of the treated flies. The observed maturity of the accessory glands in the treated females indicated that neem compound should possess specific activity on the ovaries only, without affecting the whole female reproductive organs as reported by Di Ilio et al. (1999) in case of C. capitata. Further physiological assays are necessary to analyze which metabolic pathways are involved in the chemosterilant activity of neem extracts on Bactrocera species.

Exposure to unfavorable environmental conditions during pupation is known to have a negative effect on the survival of tephritid fruit flies (Jackson et al., 1998). Gaabour and Hayes (1984) reported a correlation between increasing azadirachtin concentration and reduction in pupation/adult emergence in case of the face fly, Musca autumnalis De Geer. The effect was explained due to the possible disruption in the neuroendocrine center of moulting insects (Rembold, 1988; Rembold and Sieber, 1981). The present finding is partially similar with the observation of Stark et al. (1990) who recorded no significant effect on fecundity and fertility of the medfly, C. capitata, oriental fruit fly B. dorsalis and melon fly, B. cucurbitae, that survived the larval-pupal stage when exposed as late third instar larvae in azadirachtin treated sand.

Neem contains an array of chemicals having different complex mode of action on insects. In the present endeavour only popping larvae were exposed to azadirachtin treated saw dust (contact toxicity) and were limited only till adult emergence. The effect of oral toxicity (feeding azadirachtin at third instar larvae) and the fecundity and post embryonic development of the emerged adult flies should be investigated to speculate the effect of azadirachtin on F1 generation. Commercial nimbicidine used in the present investigation contained approximately 0.03% azadirachtin, in addition to other substances. Hence, per unit weight of azadirachtin in nimbicidine must have been less than pure technical azadirachtin. However, it is presumed that the presence of 0.03% azadirachtin is responsible for the recorded effects on B. dorsalis and B. cucurbitae under this study.

The present experimental results clearly indicate that the commercial formulation nimbicidine as well as neem leaf dust can efficiently inhibit the fecundity and fertility of both the Bactrocera species under laboratory condition. Field use of neem may be problematic because azadiracthin degrades rapidly after exposure to UV radiation (Barnby et al., 1989). However, the use of azadirachtin based compounds in insecticidal baits appears promising when mixed with attractant substances such as heptanol, protein hydrolysate (Prokopy and Vargas, 1996; Roessler, 1989). Further investigations are needed to develop the strategies for integrated pest management techniques for B. cucurbitae and B. dorsalis using neem as a cheap, effective and renewable source of eco-friendly botanical insecticide.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

Authors would like to thank Dr. Md. Mahbubr Rahman Gazi, ACI Ltd., Dhaka, Bangladesh for the kind supply of commercial neem compound used in the present study.

REFERENCES

  • Allwood, A.J., A. Cninajariyawong, R.A.I. Drew, E.L. Hamacek and D.L. Hancock et al., 1999. Host plant records of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Southeast Asia. Raffles Bull. Zool. Suppl., 7: 92-92.


  • APHIS (Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service), 1988. Schedules for fruits, nuts and vegetables section VI-T102. Plant Protection and Quarantine Treatment Method, Hyattsville, MD:USDA.


  • Barnby, M.A., R.B. Yamasaki and J.A. Kloeke, 1989. Biological activity of azadirachtin, three derivates and their ultraviolet radiation degradation products against tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) larvae. J. Econ. Entomol., 82: 58-63.


  • Burkhard, G., 1989. Die wirkung von azadirachtin auf die hormonelle regulation des flug und reprodutinosstoffweehsels von Phormia terraenovae. Dip. Thesis. University of Freiburg, Germany.


  • Di Ilio, V., M. Cristofaro, D. Marchini, P. Nobe and R. Daliai, 1999. Effects of a neem compound on the fecundity and longevity of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 92: 76-82.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Gaabour, I.A. and D.K. Hayes, 1984. Biological activity of azadirachtin, component of the neem tree, inhibiting moulting in the face fly, Musca autumnalis De Geer (Diptera: Muscidae). Environ. Entomol., 13: 803-812.


  • Handler, A. and T. Postlethwatt, 1978. Regulation of vitellogenin synthesis by ecdysone and juvenile hormone. J. Exp. Zool., 206: 247-254.


  • Hendrichs, J., A.S. Robinson, J.P. Carol and W. Enkerlin, 2002. Medfly areawide sterile insect technique programmes for prevention, suppression or eradication: The importance of mating behaviour studies. Florida Entomol., 85: 1-13.
    Direct Link    


  • Huang, Z., P. Shi, G. Chen and J. Du, 2007. Effects of azadirachtin on hemolymph protein expression in Ostrinia furnacalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am., 100: 245-250.
    Direct Link    


  • Jackson, C.G., J.P. Long and L.M. Klungness, 1998. Depth of pupation in four species of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in sand with and without moisture. J. Econ. Entomol., 91: 138-142.
    Direct Link    


  • Koyama, J., H. Kakinohana and T. Miyatake, 2004. Eradication of the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae, in Japan: Importance of behavior, ecology, genetics and evolution. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 49: 331-349.
    Direct Link    


  • McQuate, G.T., S.L. Peck, P.G. Barr and C.D. Sylva, 2005. Comparative evaluation of spinosad and phloxine B as toxicants in protein baits for suppression of three fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) species. J. Econ. Entomol., 98: 1170-1178.
    Direct Link    


  • Metcalf, R.L. and E.R. Metcalf, 1992. Fruit Flies of the Family Tephritidae. In: Plant Kairomones in Insect Ecology and Control, Metcalf, R.L. and E.R. Metcalf (Eds.). Chapman and Hall, Routledge, London, pp: 109-152


  • Mordue, A.J. and A. Blackwell, 1993. Azadirachtin: An update. J. Insect Physiol., 39: 903-924.
    Direct Link    


  • Prokopy, R.J. and R.I. Vargas, 1996. Attractions of Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae) flies to odor of coffee fruit. J. Chem. Ecol., 22: 807-820.
    Direct Link    


  • Rembold, H. and K.P. Sieber, 1981. Effect of azadirachtin on oocyte development in Locusta migratoriodes. Proceedings of the 1st World Neem Conference, (WN'81), Germany, pp: 75-80.


  • Rembold, H., 1988. Isomeric Azadirachtins and Their Mode of Action. In: Focus on Phytochemical Pesticides: The Neem Tree, Jacobson, M. (Ed.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., USA., pp: 47-67


  • Roessler, Y., 1989. Insecticidal Bait and Cover Spray. In: World Crop Pest. Fruit Flies, Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control, Robinson, A.S. and G. Hooper (Eds.). Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp: 101-138


  • Schmutterer, H. and R.P. Singh, 2002. List of Insect Pests Susceptible to Neem Products. In: The Neem Tree (Azadirachta indica A. Juss.) and Other Meliaceous Plants, Schmutterer, H. (Ed.). VCH Publications, Germany, pp: 411-456


  • Schulz, W.D. and U. Schluter, 1984. Structural damages caused by neem in Epilachna varivestis: A summary of histological and ultrastructural data Ii. Tissues affected in adults. Proceedings of the 2nd International Neem Conference, May 25-28, 1984, Germany, pp: 237-252.


  • Singh, S., 2003. Effects of aqueous extract of neem seed kernel and azadirachtin on the fecundity, fertility and post-embryonic development on the melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae and the oriental fruit fly, Bactrocera dorsalis (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Applied Entomol., 127: 540-547.
    Direct Link    


  • Stark, J.D., R.I. Vargas and R.K. Thalman, 1990. Azadirachtin: Effects on metamorphosis: Longevityand reproduction of three tephritid fruit fly species (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol., 83: 2168-2174.
    Direct Link    


  • Steets, R., 1976. The effect of purified extract of the fruit of Azadirachta indica A. Juss. On Leptinotarsa decimlineata Say (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Z. fur Angewandte Entomol., 82: 169-176.


  • Stefens, R.J. and H. Schmutterer, 1983. The effect of a crude methanolic neem (Azadirachta indica) seed kernel extract on metamorphosis and quality of adults of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratetis capitata Wied (Dip: Tephritidae). Z. Angewandte Entomol., 94: 98-103.


  • Uchida, G.K., R.I. Vargas, J.W. Beardsley and N.J. Liquido, 1990. Host suitability of wild cucurbits for melon fly, Dacus cucurbitae Coquillett, in Hawaii, with notes on their distribution and taxonomic status. Proc. Hawaii Entomol. Soc., 30: 37-52.
    Direct Link    


  • Vargas, R.I., N.W. Miller and J.D. Stark, 2003. Field trials of spinosad as a replacement for naled, DDVP and malathion in methyl eugenol and cue-lure bucket traps to attract and kill male oriental fruit flies and melon flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Hawaii. J. Econ. Entomol., 96: 1780-1785.
    Direct Link    


  • Wong, T.T.Y., M.M. Ramadan, J.C. Herr and D.O. McInnis, 1992. Suppression of a Mediterranean fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) population with concurrent parasitoid and sterile fly releases in Kula, Maui, Hawaii. J. Econ. Entomol., 85: 1671-1681.
    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved