HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2006 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 12 | Page No.: 2358-2361
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2006.2358.2361
The Use of Seed Proteins Revealed by SDS-PAGE in Taxonomy of Some Lathyrus L. Species Grown in Turkey
Irfan Emre, Dilek Turgut-Balik, Hasan GENC and Ahmet Sahin

Abstract: In this study total 9 taxa belong to four different sections (Pratensis, Orobon, Orobus and Platystylis) collected from different regions of Turkey have been studied for the analysis of seed storage protein profiles to examine their relationship by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) technique. Data obtained from electrophoresis of seed proteins were analysed using hierarchical clustering analysis and Euclidean distance was used for calculating the genetic resemblance. Dendogram was formed using average linkage. Electrophoretic protein profiles of seed cotyledons were showed that all taxa except for L. brachypterus var. brachypterus formed two clusters. The first one consisted of L. pratensis, L. laxiflorus subsp. laxiflorus, L. roseus and the second one L. digitatus, L. spathulatus, L. boissieri L. nivalis and L. aureus. In addition, total protein profile differences were observed when four taxa originated from 9 geographical regions belong to three sections (Sections Platystylis, Pratensis and Orobon) were analysed. Protein amount was found to be highest in L. spathulatus and lowest in L. brachypterus var. brachypterus.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Irfan Emre, Dilek Turgut-Balik, Hasan GENC and Ahmet Sahin, 2006. The Use of Seed Proteins Revealed by SDS-PAGE in Taxonomy of Some Lathyrus L. Species Grown in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9: 2358-2361.

Keywords: Lathyrus, total protein, sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), seed protein, taxonomy and Cluster analysis

INTRODUCTION

Fabaceae is one of the largest plant families of flowering plants comprises about 269 genera and 5100 species in the world (Mabberly, 1997). The genus Lathyrus is placed in the tribes of Vicieae of Fabaceae family and divided into 13 sections (Kupicha, 1983). Lathyrus has 152 species and shows a broad diffusion throughout the world (Alkin et al., 1986). The Lathyrus L. genus is represented with 70 taxa in the level of species, subspecies and variety and is divided into 10 sections in Turkey (Davis, 1970). Additionally, six taxa have later been described from Turkey (Ertekin and Saya, 1990; Ertekin, 1994; Davis et al., 1988; Maxted and Goyder, 1988; Guner and Ozhatay, 2000).

The systematic methodology mainly based on morphology has been improved by the incorporation of various characters such as physiology, ecology or biochemical characters. Several biochemical analysis, especially of proteins, make it possible to establish differences at various taxonomic levels (Vaughan, 1983). Leguminous plants are characterized by a high protein content in the seeds. Therefore they are of remarkable agricultural interest (Przybylska et al., 1977). The protein contents of legumes are about double those of most cereals in that on average the percentage of protein is 21-25% (Monsoor and Yusuf, 2002; Shahidi et al., 2001). The electrophoretic analysis of proteins found in seed and storage organs has been recognized as a powerful tool of experimental taxonomy in detecting intraspecific variations and evaluating interspecific relationships (Przybylska, 1995; Przybylska et al., 2000). Although many studies have been performed on the genus Lathyrus, the electrophoretic analysis and protein amounts of taxa examined in the present study has not yet been investigated.

The aim of the present study was to investigate both interspecific and intraspecific variations in genus Lathyrus by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrilamyde gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) technique. In this study total 9 taxa and 14 different geographic distributions of these taxa belong to four different sections (Pratensis, Orobon, Orobus and Platystylis) collected from different regions of Turkey have been studied for the analysis of seed storage protein profiles to examine their relationship. Protein amounts of samples were also determined.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Dry seeds of Lathyrus species were collected from various areas of Turkey. Details about the seed materials were given in Table 1.

Seed proteins were extracted as described by Jha and Ohri (2002). Seed coats were removed prior to extraction and cotyledons were obtained. These were homogenized in 0.1M Tris-HCl buffer (pH: 7.5). Total protein was extracted after centrifugation at 17.600 g for 20 min at and supernatants were used for analysis. Proteins in the supernatants were quantified using Bio-Rad DC protein assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories, UK). The samples were boiled for 5 min prior to loading, then average 200 μg protein of each sample was loaded on to the 12% SDS-PAGE (Laemmli, 1970). Electrophoresis was performed in the Protean II electrophoresis cell (Bio-Rad Laboratories, UK) at 20 mA until the bromophenol dye (BDH Laboratory Supplies Poole, England) front had reached the bottom of the gel. The gels were stained in Coomassie Brilliant Blue (Sigma Aldrich Chemie, Germany) solution for 30 min at 67°C and destained in destaining solution for 3-4 h at 67°C to visualise the proteins.

Statistical analysis: Evaluation of protein profiles was done visually with an emphasis on qualitative banding differences. The bands were divided into four distinct groups of strong dark, dark, faint and no band and four groups represented by 4, 3, 2 and 1, respectively, in statistical analysis. On the gel, five distinct regions can be distinguished designed as A, B, C, D and E being equivalent to decreasing MWs (Molecular weight; 97 kDa (kilodalton), 66, 45, 30 and 20.1 kDa, respectively; Amersham Biosciences, UK) (Fig. 1). We propose a numerical classification for all protein bands. Seven bands in region A (a0 to a6), 4 bands in region B (b1 to b4), 4 bands in region C (c1 to c4), 3 bands in region D (d1 to d3) and, 2 bands in region E (e1 to e2) were distinguished.

Data obtained from electrophoresis of seed proteins were analysed using the SPSS (version 10.0) program (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Hierarchical cluster analysis was used for comparison between species and Euclidean distance was used for calculating the genetic resemblance. Dendogram was formed using average linkage.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The analysis of seed proteins by SDS-PAGE revealed that seeds of Lathyrus are very rich in storage proteins with a large number of stable bands in the electrophoregram under reducing conditions (Fig. 1). This reflects a number of genetic and phylogenic relationships which could be used as a criteria for the classification of species in this genus (El-Shanshoury, 1997).

Fig. 1:
SDS-PAGE of seed total proteins in nine taxa. M: Marker; 1: L. aureus (Isparta); 2: L. digitatus (Isparta: Golcuk); 3: L. spathulatus (Konya); 4: L. nivalis (Karaman); 5: L. boissieri (Elazig); 6: L. pratensis (Konya); 7: L. laxiflorus subsp. laxiflorus (Isparta: Pinargozu) 8: L. brachypterus var. brachypterus (Karaman); 9: L. roseus (Konya)

Table 1: Localities of examined taxa

Fig. 2: Dendogram of Lathyrus taxa based on total seed protein profiles

Fig. 3:
SDS-PAGE of total seed protein bands among taxa according to the geographic distribution. M: Marker; 1, 2: L. digitatus (Isparta: Golcuk and Egirdir, respectively); 3, 4: L. pratensis (Konya and Isparta); 5, 6, 7: L. laxiflorus subsp. laxiflorus (Isparta: Pinargozu, Trabzon, Isparta: Egirdir); 8, 9: L. roseus (Konya, Isparta)

Table 2: Protein amounts of examined taxa

The electrophoregrams were evaluated on the basis of band mobility and relative intensity and a dendogram of Lathyrus taxa based on the total seed protein profile is given in Fig. 2. B and C region of the electropherogram was the most informative part of the gel that revealed the largest number of different protein profile in the electropherogram of Lathyrus taxa shown in Fig. 1. Each taxa protein showed its own electrophoresis pattern with subunits of varied molecular weights. Differences were observed in both presence and absence of a particular band. The most distinctive sample that analyzed was brachypterus with some faint protein bands and 1 strong dark band. Between 30 and 20 kDa major protein band (d3 band) was present in all of the species studied, except L. brachypterus var. brachypterus that has a dark band instead of strong dark band in the same molecular weight. Protein amounts in all taxa were also quite similar except for L. brachypterus var. brachypterus that it’s protein amount was lowest (Table 2).

Electrophoretic protein profiles of seed cotyledons were showed that all taxa except for L. brachypterus var. brachypterus formed two clusters. The first one consisted of the L. pratensis, L laxiflorus subsp. laxiflorus, L. roseus, second one by five taxa (L. digitatus, L. spathulatus, L. boissieri L. nivalis and L. aureus). Total protein profile of L. brachypterus var. brachypterus were distinguished from the other members of the Platystylis. This may be being this taxon endemic for Turkey (Davis, 1970).

In section pratensis, protein profiles of L. pratensis and L. laxiflorus subsp. laxiflorus show a high level of similarity to each other. Both species had the same major protein bands but some minor bands were different from each other L. roseus, belonging to Section Orobon, was also found to be these two taxa (pratensis and laxiflorus). L. roseus, very distinctive species, standing somewhat between Sections Lathyrus and Orobus (Davis, 1970). Although basic protein bands of L. roseus similar to species of Section Orobon it can be distinguished in other bands from L. pratensis and L. laxiflorus subsp. laxiflorus. In e2 band, for example, L. roseus was found to be different from two species. In b3 band also diversity observed so that two species have faint band but L. roseus has dark band. In d1 band, while two species have dark band L. roseus has faint band profile. According to band profiles of L. roseus, L. pratensis and L. laxiflorus subsp. laxiflorus all three taxa formed Cluster I. L. digitatus, L. spathulatus, L. nivalis, L. boissieri and L. aureus taxa formed cluster II. L. nivalis shows similarity with L. boissieri and L. digitatus with L. spathulatus. L. aureus, belong to Sect. Orobus, also show similarity with taxa of Section Orobon (digitatus, spathulatus, nivalis and boissieri). In a1 band L. nivalis differ from others. While L. nivalis has faint band other four members of cluster II, have dark band. In a4 band, L. spathulatus has dark band, other taxa have faint band profile. Beside L. digitatus superficially similar to L. spathulatus, protein band patterns of two species also close to one another. In a0, b1, d1 bands, L. aureus different from other taxa.

Band profiles of the examined taxa from nine geographical regions belong to three sections (Platystylis, Pratensis and Orobon) are shown in Fig. 3. Little differences were observed in the examples of total seed protein bands among taxa according to the geographic distribution. For example, in b2 and d1 bands of L. pratensis, differences were observed in Konya and Isparta samples. Similarly, while the protein profiles of two samples of L. laxiflorus subsp. laxiflorus (Isparta: Pinargozu and Egirdir) have almost the same protein bands, other sample of L. laxiflorus subsp. laxiflorus (Trabzon: Dernekpazari) shows little differences in c4, e1 and e3 bands.

Electrophoretic protein profiles and amounts of proteins of sections Pratensis, Orobon, Orobus and Platystylis were examined by SDS-PAGE. Total seed protein data reported in the present study are essentially consistent with Flora of Turkey except for L. brachypterus var. brachypterus (Davis, 1970) and also little differences were observed in the examples of total seed protein bands among taxa according to the geographic distribution. Protein amounts of all species were also found to be between 157.397-226.832 μg mL-1. Further analysis of genetic variations between the species, such as analysis of subprotein fractions (albumins, globulins etc.), RAPD studies, which have been used as a taxonomic tool in many species, may able to further resolve the phylogenetic relationships between these species.

REFERENCES

  • Alkin, R., D.J. Goyder, F.A. Bisby and R.J. White, 1986. Names and Synonyms Species and Subspecies in the Vicieae, ISSUE 3 Database Project, Experimental Taxonomic Information Products. Publication No. 7, University Southhampton, Southhampton


  • Davis, P.H., 1970. Lathyrus L. flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh pp. 274-325


  • Davis, P.H., R.R. Mill and T. Kit, 1988. Flora of Turkey and East Aegean Islands. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh


  • El-Shanshoury, A., 1997. The use of seed proteins revealed by SDSPAGE in taxonomy and phylogeny of some Lathyrus species. Biol. Plant, 39: 553-559.
    Direct Link    


  • Ertekin, S.A. and O. Saya, 1990. A new record for the Flora of Turkey. Turk J. Bot., 15: 75-77.


  • Ertekin, S.A., 1994. A new record for the Flora of Turkey. Turk. J. Bot., 18: 33-34.


  • Guner, F. and N. Ozhatay, 2000. Lathyrus L. In: Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, Guner, A., N. Ozhatay, T. Ekim and K.H.C. Baser (Eds.). Vol. 11, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh


  • Jha, S.S. and D. Ohri, 2002. Comparative study of seed protein profiles in the genus Pisum. Biol. Plant., 45: 529-532.


  • Kupicha, E.K., 1983. The infrageneric structure of Lathyrus. Notes R. Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 41: 209-244.


  • Laemmli, U.K., 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227: 680-685.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Mabberly, D.J., 1997. The Plant-Book. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp: 320-323


  • Maxted, N. and D.J. Goyder, 1988. A new species of Lathyrus Sect. Lathyrus (Leguminosae, Papilionodeae) from Turkey. Kew Bull., 43: 711-714.


  • Monsoor, M.A. and H.K.M. Yusuf, 2002. In vitro protein digestibility of lathyrus pea Lathyrus sativus lentil Lens culinaris and chickpea Cicer arietinum. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol., 37: 97-99.


  • Przybylska, J., S. Blixt, J. Huric and Z. Zimniak-Przybylska, 1977. Comparative study of seed proteins in the genus Pisum I. Electrophoretic patterns of different protein fractions. Genet. Polonica, 18: 27-38.


  • Przybylska, J., 1995. Some examples of the use of electrophoretic protein analysis in taxonomic investigations of leguminous plants. J. Applied Genet., 36: 255-271.


  • Przybylska, J., Z.Z. Przybylska and P. Krajewski, 2000. Diversity of seed globulins in Lathyrus sativus L. and some related species. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol., 47: 239-246.


  • Shukry, W.M., 2001. The effect of industrial effluents and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae on nutrient distribution and concentration of wheat and bean plants. J. Biol. Sci., 1: 689-693.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Vaughan, V.B., 1983. The Use of Seed Proteins in Taxonomy and Phylogeny. In: Seed Proteins, Daussant, J., J. Mosse and J.B. Vaughan (Eds.). Academic Press, London, New York, pp: 135-150


  • Shahidi, F., U.D. Chavan, M. Naczk and R. Amarowicz, 2001. Nutrient distribution and phenolic antioxidants in air-classified fractions of beach pea (Lathyrus maritimus L.). J. Agric. Food Chem., 49: 926-933.
    CrossRef    PubMed    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved