HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2006 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 9 | Page No.: 1787-1790
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2006.1787.1790
Phytoplankton Diversity and Nutrients at the Jajerood River in Iran
Farzaneh Farahani, Hananeh Korehi, Shabnam Mollakarami, Soghra Skandari, Seyyed Ghasem Ghorbanzadeh Zaferani and Zahra Mallek Ciahe Shashm

Abstract: Jajerood river is one of the freshwater river in Iran. Seasonal changes in phytoplankton composition and physico-chemical factors affecting these parameters were investigated in this study. Qualitative phytoplankton and nutrient analysis were carried out between 2005 and 2006 at 19 sampling stations of Jajerood, situated in the north-eastern of Tehran. A total of 53 taxa were determined, belonging to four algae classes: Bacillariophyceae, Chlorophyceae, Cyanophyceae and Dinophyceae. Bacillariphyceae appeared to be the dominant group in terms of total genus number during the study period. The number of phytoplankton genus was high in summer and quite low in winter. The highest phytoplankton diversity determined in summer was due to the increase in the numerical of Cymbella from the diatoms. Phytoplankton diversity declined to the lowest level in the winter. The lowest and highest concentration of NO3 and PO4 were 1.9 and 8.5 μg L-1 and 0.05 and 0.76 μg L-1, respectively.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Farzaneh Farahani, Hananeh Korehi, Shabnam Mollakarami, Soghra Skandari, Seyyed Ghasem Ghorbanzadeh Zaferani and Zahra Mallek Ciahe Shashm, 2006. Phytoplankton Diversity and Nutrients at the Jajerood River in Iran. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9: 1787-1790.

Keywords: nutrients, diversity, genus composition, Phytoplankton and Jajerood river

INTRODUCTION

Algae are the major primary producers in many aquatic systems and are an important food source for other organisms. Genus composition and the seasonal variations of these forms in freshwater are dependent on the interactions between physical and chemical factors. Therefore, phytoplankton genus and diversity fluctuate according to the seasons. It has been shown that many of these fluctuations, called seasonal successions, could result from the life activities of the previously existing phytoplanktons and zooplanktons, fishes and other organisms (Sommer et al., 1986). The seasonal succession of the phytoplankton is a problem that has attracted the attention of algologists for a long time, but many of the studies on periodicity have been restricted to limited areas. Unfortunately, there are a few studies carried out on the phytoplankton succession and composition in Jajrood. The first phytoplankton study in the region was carried out by Shadkam (2005). No attempts have been made to explain the seasonal development of phytoplanktons in this river. However, there is inadequate information on the seasonal distribution of the freshwater phytoplanktons in Iran. Therefore, this study was carried out to investigate the composition diversity and to study the nutrients and physico-chemical and their impacts on the diversity of the phytoplankton by seasonal samplings in the Jajerood river.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out in the coastal area of Jajerood, Nineteen sampling stations were selected in the area. Phytoplankton and water samples were taken from a 0-25 cm water column seasonally from the stations between March 2005 and January 2006, using 1.5 l PVC-bottles water samplers. At each station sampling was done under ice. For each sampling station two PVC-bottles (500 mL, for qualitative and quantitative analysis) were filled. The samples for qualitative analyses were preserved in 4% formaldehyde solution immediately after collection. Later on in the laboratory the preserved samples were left to stand for 24 h in order to achieve sedimentation of the algal cells. After sedimentation the samples were concentrated first to 50 mL by carefully removing 450 mL through aquarium tubes. The remaining 50 mL were centrifuged for 20 s at 4000 rpm. The liquid phase was then immediately removed and the remaining pellet re suspended in approximately 10 drops of sample water with a Pasteur pipette. When the exact identification of genus proved impossible from the preserved samples, fresh samples were used for assistance. Dissolved oxygen concentration, temperature and pH were measured with a combined electrode (Multi 340 i model) in situation. Total Nitrate-Nitrogen and Phosphate concentrations of the river water were determined in the laboratory (Moopam, 1999). Phytoplankton individuals were observed using a Nikon E200 microscope with Normarski interference optics. The phytoplankton was identified mainly using the works of Desikachary (1959), Thienemann (1962), Tiffany and Britton (1968) and Prescott (1982).

RESULTS

Physico-chemical factors: Seasonal changes in temperature in different sampling stations are shown in Table 1.

The lowest temperature (6.7°C) was recorded in winter, whereas the highest, in summer, was 27°C.

Dissolved oxygen changes in different sampling stations are shown in Table 2.

The lowest dissolved oxygen (0.02 mg L-1) was recorded in spring, whereas the highest, in autumn, was 18.45 mg L-1.

Table 1: Seasonal changes in surface water temperature at sampling stations

Table 2: Seasonal changes in surface water dissolved oxygen at sampling stations

Table 3: Seasonal changes in surface water pH at sampling stations

Table 4: Seasonal changes in surface water nitrate concentrations at Sampling Stations

Table 5: Seasonal changes in surface water phosphate concentrations at sampling stations

Table 6: Seasonal distribution of phytoplankton in Jajerood river

Nutrients showed important seasonal cycles but no differences among seasons were statistically significant for these nutrients (nitrate+nitrite, phosphate). The lowest (0.5 μg L-1) and highest (10 μg L-1) nitrate+nitrite concentrations were found in autumn and spring respectively (Table 4). The lowest and the highest phosphate concentrations were trace in winter and 0.76 μg L-1 in summer. The changes in phosphate concentrations among the stations were not significant (Table 5).

Phytoplankton composition and abundance: A total of 53 taxa of phytoplankton were identified during the study. These taxa include 4 division that belonging to 39 genera of Bacillariophyceae, 9 genera of Cyanophyceae, 2 genera of Dinophyceae and 3 genera of Chlorophyceae (Table 6).

Diatoms were dominant in terms of the number of genus and their abundance. The highest number of genus was found in summer and only during this period was the number of the Diatoms genus higher than that of another phytoplanktons. The lowest phytoplankton genus number was determined in winter.

Cymbella, Asterionella, Navicula, Diatoma, Nitzchia, Cocconeis, Synedra, Surirella, Epithemia were the most dominant algae at all stations. Chlorophyta and Dinophyta were absent in spring.

The abundance of Diatoms was low in winter and spring (Table 6). The lowest phytoplankton genus number belongs to Dinophyceae (Table 6).

DISCUSSION

The 26 identified phytoplankton taxa in different parts of the Jajerood by Shadkam (2005). Diatoms and Chlorophyceae were dominant in terms of the number of genus and their abundance.

As this result shows, the cell number of Diatoms was the highest among the groups. The phytoplankton of rivers was dominated by Diatoms, whilst blue-green algae, green algae and Dinoflagellates were less significant (Cetin and Sen, 2004). The highest phytoplankton genus number was found in summer. The summer increase was attributed to the increase in the cell number of pennete Diatoms.

Centric Diatoms are one of the best adapted algal groups to turbulent and turbid systems (Izaguirre et al., 2001), Whereas pinnate Diatoms are regarded as benthic forms. It has been reported that pinnate Diatoms were richer in number of taxa than centric forms in the phytoplankton of many shallow rivers (Cetin and Sen, 2004; Gonulol, 1985).

Phytoplankton cell numbers found in this study were higher than those previously reported by Shadkam (2005) for the Jajerood river. This could be due to the seasonal sampling programme of this study.

The seasonal variations of phytoplankton are related to a variety of environmental factors in aquatic environments (Wu and Chou, 1999). Water temperature and transparency are among the most important physical factors affecting the distribution and seasonal variations of phytoplankton in rivers (Harrison and Hildrew, 1998; Mosisch et al., 1999).

The increase in phytoplankton during the summer and Autumn months in river Jajerood could also be a result of the increasing water temperature.

The effects of water temperature on phytoplankton have been examined in many freshwater ecosystems and it was found that water temperature strongly regulates the seasonal variation of phytoplankton (Lund, 1965; Richardson et al., 2000; Izaguirre et al., 2001).

Light is a major resource for phytoplankton and has a complex pattern of spatial and temporal variability (Litchman, 2000). Suspended matter in river water increases in winter and spring, resulting in minimum transparency. During the summer the transparency was at its maximum level. There was also a significant correlation between the growth of phytoplankton and transparency in Jajerood river since the largest populations of all algae occurred during the summer whilst individual numbers were low in winter and spring.

No relation was observed between diatom growth and pH since high and low individual numbers were observed at similar pH levels in Jajerood (Table 3).

Nutrient concentrations in general decreased to their lowest level in autumn due to an increase in phytoplankton abundance. In general, significant negative relationships were found between phytoplankton abundance and nutrient concentration in this study. Exceptional increases in phytoplankton, as was the case in summer in this study, may be related to all the processes prevailing in the research area. Nutrient concentrations recorded in this research were lower than previous findings of Shadkam (2005) in Jajerood river.

Further study is necessary to understand the relationships between phytoplankton and environmental properties in the Jajerood river.

REFERENCES

  • Desikachary, T.V., 1959. Cyanophyta. 1st Edn., Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp: 683


  • Gonulol, A., 1985. Studies on the phytoplankton of the bayYndYr dam lake. Communications, 3: 21-38.


  • Izaguirre, I., I. O'Farrell and G. Tell, 2001. Variation in phytoplankton composition and limnological features in a water-water ecotone of Lower Parana Basin (Argentina). Freshwater Biol., 46: 63-74.
    Direct Link    


  • Cetin, A.K. and B. Sen, 2004. Seasonal distribution of phytoplankton in Orduzu Dam Lake (Malatya, Turkey). Turk. J. Bot., 28: 279-285.
    Direct Link    


  • Litchman, E., 2000. Growth rates of phytoplankton under fluctuating light. Freshwater Biol., 44: 223-235.
    Direct Link    


  • Lund, J.W.G., 1965. The ecology of the freshwater phytoplankton. Biol. Rev., 40: 231-293.


  • Moopam, 1999. Manual of Oceanographic Observations and Pollutant Analyses Methods. 3rd Edn., Regional Organization for the Protection, Kuwait


  • Mosisch, T.D., S.E. Bunn, P.M. Davies and C.J. Marshall, 1999. Effects of shade and nutrient manipulation on periphyton growth in a subtropical stream. Aquat. Bot., 64: 167-177.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Prescott, GW., 1982. Algae of the Western Great Lakes Area. 1st Edn., Koenigstein Otto Koeltz Science Publication, Germany


  • Richardson, T.L., C.E. Gibson and S.I. Heaney, 2000. Temperature, growth and seasonal succession of Phytoplankton in Lake Baikal, Siberia. Freshwater Biol., 44: 431-440.
    Direct Link    


  • Harrison, S.S.C. and A.G. Hildrew, 1998. Patterns in the epilithic community of a lake Littoral. Freshwater Biol., 39: 477-492.
    Direct Link    


  • Sommer, U., Z.M. Gliwiez, W. Lampert and A. Duncan, 1986. The PEG-Model of seasonal succession of plankton events in freshwater. Arch. Hydrobiol., 106: 433-471.
    Direct Link    


  • Wu, J.T. and J.W. Chou, 1999. Dinoflagellate associations in feitsu ireservoir, Taiwan. Botanical Bull. Acad. Sinica, 39: 137-145.
    Direct Link    


  • Shadkam, S.H., 2005. Identification of periphytons andstudy of environmental effects on their variety in Jejerood river. (In Press).


  • Thienemann, A., 1962. Die Binnengewasser. Einzeldarstellungen aus der Limnologie und Ihren Nachbargebieten. Schweizerbart, Stuttgart


  • Tiffany, H. and E. Britton, 1952. The Algae of Illinois. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Pages: 407

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved