HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2006 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 8 | Page No.: 1454-1459
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2006.1454.1459
Suppression of the Cowpea Bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) Infesting Stored Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Seeds with Some Edible Plant Product Powders
F. A. Ajayi and H. U. Wintola

Abstract: Five Edible Plant Product Powders (EPPP), West African black pepper (Piper guineense Schum and Thonn), clove (Syzgium aromaticum (L.) Merril and Percy), Ethiopian pepper (Xylopia aethiopica (Dunn.) A. Rich), Alligator pepper (Aframomum melegueta Schum) and African locust bean (Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) R. Br. Ex G. Donf.) were studies for their effectiveness in suppressing oviposition, egg hatch and progeny emergence against Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Pulverized EPPP at the rate of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 g/20 g cowpea seeds were applied as pre-treated and treatment after infestation. All the plant product powders significantly (p≤0.05) reduced oviposition by C. maculatus when tested as pre-treated application, compared with oviposition in control treatments. Consequently, F1 progeny emergence was significantly (p≤0.05) suppressed compared with emergence in control. In the treatment after infestation, egg mortalities were highest in treatments with WABP, Clove and Ethiopian pepper. There were however significant differences (p≤0.05) between the EPPP and the control treatment at all dosage rates tested. The effectiveness of the EPPP in both studies was thus ranked as follows: WABP>Clove>Ethiopian pepper>Alligator pepper>African locust bean.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
F. A. Ajayi and H. U. Wintola, 2006. Suppression of the Cowpea Bruchid (Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) Infesting Stored Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) Seeds with Some Edible Plant Product Powders. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9: 1454-1459.

Keywords: egg-mortality, A. melegueta, P.guineense, powders, Callosobruchus maculatus, X. aethiopica, product, plant, Edible, S.aromaticum, oviposition and P. biglobosa

INTRODUCTION

Cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp., is a very important grain legume in West Africa (Stanton et al., 1966). It is widely cultivated and eaten in Nigeria (Ohiagu, 1986), the most important producing areas in Nigeria being located in the savanna regions (Agboola, 1979). It is however cultivated in a large range of ecologies in all the continents of the world (Rachie and Robets, 1974). Nigeria accounts for 70% of the world’s production. It is an extremely valuable crop both as a source of revenue and as an important source of cheap dietary protein for the third world where meat is expensive (Stanton et al., 1966; Alghali, 1991). The high protein and lysine contents of the seeds make them a natural supplement to staple diets of cereals, roots, tubers and fruits (Bressani, 1985).

The cowpea seed bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera:Bruchidae) is a cosmopolitan field-to-store pest ranked as the principal post-harvest pest of cowpea in the tropics (Jackai and Daoust, 1986; Singh et al., 1990). It causes substantial quantitative and qualitative losses manifested by seed perforation and reduction in weight, market value and germinability of seeds (IITA, 1989; Adeduntan and Ofuya, 1998). At least 4% of the total annual production of about 30,000 tonnes valued at over 30 million US dollars is lost annually in Nigeria alone to this bruchid (Caswell, 1980; Singh et al., 1983). Under traditional storage conditions, 100% infestation of cowpea occurring within 6 months or more often within 3 to 5 months of storage is common (Booker, 1967; Caswell and Akibu, 1980; Seck, 1993).

The use of synthetic insecticides has been the major means through which cowpea seeds are protected during storage. The use of synthetic pesticides over the years has revealed the nuisance they constitute to the ecosystem such as their undesirable side effects on non-target organisms including man and the fact that they are environmentally disruptive (Schwab et al., 1995).

Due to the problems associated with the use of synthetic insecticides, some insecticides of plant origin with a long history of traditional use have been identified (Flint and Bosch, 1981). Some of these plants have been reported not to have the problems associated with the use of synthetic insecticides (Arnason et al., 1989). To this end, there has been a re-new interest in tropical countries towards the search for safer and cheaper ways of controlling the major storage insect pests of pulses and cereal grains (Singh et al., 1978; Malik and Naqvi, 1984). One area receiving greater attention is the use of certain edible plant materials as grain protectants (Iwuala et al., 1981; Ivbijaro and Agbaje, 1986).

The candidate plant products used for this study have been used previously in the management of some stored product Coleopteran (Grainge and Ahmed, 1988; Lale, 1992). There are also reports of their use as condiments and for culinary purposes in homes (Cobley and Steele, 1976; Rehm and Espig, 1991).

This present study evaluated the insecticidal efficacy of five edible plant product powders (EPPP) obtained from African locust bean (ALB) Parkia biglobosa (Jacq.) R.Br. exG. Donf; clove, Syzgium aromaticum (L.) Merril and Percy; West African black pepper (WABP) Piper guineense Schum and Thonn, alligator pepper, Aframomum melegueta Schum and Ethiopian pepper, Xylopia aethiopica (Dun.) A. Rich. on the biology of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Preparation of plant materials: Five hundred grams of dried seeds of Parkia biglobosa (African locust bean), Syzgium aromaticum (clove), Piper guineense (West African black pepper), Aframomum melegueta (alligator pepper) and Xylopia aethiopica (Ethiopian pepper) were purchased from the open market in Sabon-Gari, Kano State, Nigeria. The seeds were separately ground into powder using a high power electric mill. The powders were separately placed in transparent polypropylene bags and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C until ready for use.

Preparation of cowpea seeds: Two kilograms of clean and sorted uninfested cowpea seeds identified by Nigeria Stored Products Research Institute (NSPRI), Kano as variety Dan-illa was purchased from the open market in Kano. Screened seeds were fumigated with aluminum phosphide (from phostoxin pellets) in an air-tight container for 24 h to kill any insect present. The seeds were later aired for three days to allow for dissipation of fumigant effect. Thereafter, the cowpea seeds were stored in a black polypropylene bag until ready for use.

Maintenance of C. maculatus culture: One kilogramme of already fumigated cowpea (var. Dan-illa) seeds was divided into two parts and were placed in each of two kilner jars and infested with adult bruchid from an insect culture raised in the laboratory over five generations. Bruchid that emerged from this culture were used for the bioassay test. From this new culture, 1-2 day old of 1st or 2nd progeny of adult C. maculatus raised for the bioassay were used for the study. The colony of cowpea bruchid was maintained under laboratory conditions of 25-32°C and 56-71% h. The bioassay experiment was carried out under these conditions.

Bioactivity testing: Each of the powders of P. biglobosa, S. aromaticum, P. guineense, A. melegueta and X. aethiopica was applied at six different levels (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5 and 3.0) and admixed with 20 g of cowpea (var. Dan-illa) seeds in a 100 mL glass jar.

Each treatment was shaken vigorously for proper mixing and allowed to stand for an hour before introducing 5 pairs of 1-2 day old adult C. maculatus into each jar. Control batches were set along for each dosage rates without any admixture of powders. Adult female C. maculatus were allowed to oviposit for 7 days before being removed and discarded. The number of eggs laid in each replicate of the treatments was counted and recorded. F1 progeny that emerged in each treatment was removed and recorded for 14 consecutive days after date of first emergence.

Each of these dosage rates and treatments were separately carried out as pre-treatment and treatment after infestation. Treatments were carried out as described above in both bioassays.

Experimental design and statistical analysis: Each experiments and treatments was carried out in a randomized complete block design with each treatments replicated four times. The adults that emerged in each replicate for the F1 progeny were expressed as a percentage of the number of eggs laid and was also used to determine egg mortality. Percentage data were arc sine transformed and the entire data collected were subjected to two-way ANOVA and means were separated using the Least Significant Difference (LSD) (p≤0.05) statistic.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Both pre-treated and treatment after infestation with the Edible Plant Product Powders (EPPP) provided effective control of C. maculatus infesting stored cowpea seeds through reduced oviposition and/or reduced adult emergence. Table 1 compares the oviposition of C. maculatus in pre-treated infestation.

Table 1:
Mean Oviposition of adult C. maculatus on cowpea (var. Dan-illa) seeds pre-treated with five edible plant product powders
ALB = African locust bean; WABP = West African black pepper; SED = 1.66; LSD (p≤0.05) = 3.17 (Plant Products); SED = 1.96; LSD (p≤0.05) = 3.74 (Dosage), SED = 4.38; LSD (p≤0.05) = 8.36 (Interaction)

Table 2:
Mean percentage adult C. maculatus emergence in cowpea (var. Dan-illa) seeds pre-treated with five edible plant product powders
ALB = African Locust Bean, WABP = West African Black Pepper, SED = 1.54; LSD (p≤0.05) = 2.94 (Plant products), SED = 1.82; LSD (p≤0.05) = 3.47 (Dosage), SED = 4.06; LSD (p≤0.05) = 7.75 (Interaction), *Figures in parentheses are arc sine values to which SED and LSD are applicable

Some of the edible plant products, particularly P. guineense, S. aromaticum and X. aethiopica were effective in suppressing or completely inhibiting oviposition, while A. meleguata and P. biglobosa were only effective at high dosage rates. There was however significant (p≤0.05) differences between all the treatment levels and control. The ability of the EPPP to suppressed progeny emergence is shown in Table 2. A. melegueta and P. biglobosa recorded the highest mean number of adult emergence of 91.30 and 77.30% at 0.5 g dosage rate, respectively, compared to 88.10% in control. Table 2 also showed that treatments with P. guineense, S. aromaticum and X. aethiopica completely inhibited adult emergence at dosages of 0.5-3.0, 1.0-3.0 and 1.5-3.0 g/20 g, respectively. There were however, significant differences (p≤0.05) in adult emergence in cowpea seeds treated with P. biglobosa and A. melegueta at treatment levels of 1.0-3.0 g/20 g when compared with adult emergence in control.

Table 3 shows the mean number of eggs laid in cowpea seeds treated after infestation had taken place. There were no significant differences (p≥0.05) among all the EPPP and control treatments and between the dosage rates. The effects of the EPPP on egg mortality are reported in Table 4. This showed that P. guineense recorded 100% egg mortality at dosage rates of 1.0-3.0 g/20 g cowpea seeds. There was significant difference (p≤0.05) between egg mortalies in P. guineense (96.30%), S. aromaticum (90.90%) and X. aethiopica (90.40%), respectively. Mean differences between S. aromaticum and X. aethiopica were not significant (p≥0.05). A. melegueta (70.90%) and P. biglobosa (33.20%) were however significantly different (p≤0.05) from each other. All the EPPP at the different dosage rates recorded highly significant (p≤0.05) differences when compared with the control treatments.

The differences exhibited in suppressing and/or inhibiting oviposition, adult emergence and in causing egg mortalities by the EPPP could be due to the different active ingredients (ai) constituents contained in the EPPP. Earlier reports have shown that products from these plant materials either as oil extracts or their powders have been used in the control of stored products pests (Lale, 1992; Ajayi and Lale, 2001; Ajayi and Lale, 2000/2001; Odeyemi et al., 2000; Okunade et al., 2002a,b).

Table 3:
Mean Oviposition of adult C. maculatus on cowpea (var. Dan-illa) seeds treated after infestation with five edible plant products powders
ALB = African Locust Bean, WABP = West African Black Pepper, SED = 3.31; LSD (p≥0.05) = NS (Plant Products), SED = 3.92; LSD (p≥0.05) = NS (Dosage), SED = 8.76; LSD (p≥0.05) = NS (Interaction), NS = Non - significant

Table 4:
Mean percentage egg-mortality of C. maculatus on cowpea (var. Dan-illa) seeds treated after infestation with five edible plant product powders
ALB = African Locust Bean, WABP = West African Black Pepper, SED = 1.53; LSD (p≤0.05) = 2.92 (Plant products), SED = 1.81; LSD (p≤0.05) = 3.45 (Dosage), SED = 4.04; LSD (p≤0.05) = 7.71 (Interaction), *Figures in parentheses are arc sine values to which SED and LSD are applicable

The effectiveness of P. guineense is attributed to piperine, while the pungency and odour is due to volatile oil containing terpenes (Purseglove, 1974; Oliver-Bever, 1986). S. aromaticum has been reported to contain eugenol and caryophylline (Schavenberg and Paris, 1977). Paradol has been reported to be the major constituents in A. melegueta (Lale, 1992).

The use of P. guineense powder at the rate of 1.5 g/20 g of cowpea seeds was reported to cause 100% egg mortality of C. maculatus and also significantly reduced F1 progeny emergence (Ivbijaro and Agbaje, 1986). In another report powder of A. meleguata, Eugenia aromatica (Syn. S. aromaticum) and Piper umbellatum (Syn. P. guineense) were reported to cause high mortalities in adult Sitophilus oryzae with subsequent result of lack of F1 progeny (Lajide et al., 1998). Okunade et al. (2002a, b) had also show that Parkia sp. can be used to control Tribolium castaneum and Rhyzopertha dominica. However, in their report it was shown that the use of Parkia sp. was not as effective as the other pulverized plant products tested. The reports obtained in this report corroborates with these earlier reports. The potency of the EPPP used in this study can be rated according to their ability to suppressed oviposition, inhibit progeny emergence or caused egg mortalities in order of P. guineense>S. aromaticum>X. aethiopica>A. melegueta>P. biglobosa.

In this study, the use of the EPPP were able to effectively control the ability of C. maculatus to perpetuate on cowpea seeds during storage. This is very important in reducing damage caused by the pest in storage. This is because C. maculatus is a field-to-store pest and hence any cowpea seeds carrying eggs after harvest or those that can be contaminated by an already infested cowpea seeds, can be controlled with the use of some of these EPPP that have been reported to be very effective. Also considering their ease of availability, safety, low cost and low technological requirement in processing as against the synthetic insecticides, there is need for their adoption for the preservation of stored crop products. They are also used as an important component of diets of many Africans and Asians.

REFERENCES

  • Adeduntan, S.A. and T.I. Ofuya, 1998. Evaluation of seeds of selected varieties of cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. for susceptibility to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). Applied Trop. Agric., 3: 45-51.


  • Agboola, S.A., 1979. An Agricultural Atlas of Nigeria. Oxford University Press, London, pp: 239


  • Ajayi, F.A. and N.E. Lale, 2000. Susceptibility of unprotected seeds and seeds of local bambara groundnut cultivars protected with insecticidal essential oils to infestation by Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae). J. Stored Prod. Res., 37: 47-62.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Ajayi, F.A. and N.E.S. Lale, 2000. Toxic and repellent effects of three edible spice oils on Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Coleoptera: Bruchidae) infesting stored bambara groundnut, Vigna subterranean (L.) Verdcourt. Ann. Borno, 17/18: 239-246.


  • Alghali, A.M., 1991. Studies on cowpea farming practices in Nigeria, with emphasis on insect pest control. Trop. Pest Manage., 37: 71-74.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Arnason, J.T., B.J.R. Philogene and P. Morand, 1989. Insecticides of Plant Origin. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC., pp: 213


  • Booker, R.H., 1967. Observations on three bruchids associated with cowpea in Northern Nigeria. J. Stored Prod. Res., 3: 1-15.
    CrossRef    


  • Bressani, R., 1985. Nutritive Value of Cowpea. In: Cowpea Research, Production and Utilisation, Singh, S.R. and K.O. Rachie (Eds.). John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA., pp: 353-360


  • Caswell, G.H., 1980. A review of the work done in the entomology section of the institute for agricultural research on pests of stored grain. Samaru Miscellaneous Paper No. 99, pp: 12.


  • Caswell, G.H. and S. Akibu, 1980. The use of pirimiphos-methyl to control bruchids attacking selected varieties of stored cowpea. Trop. Grain Bull., 17/18: 9-11.


  • Cobley, L.S. and W.M. Stele, 1976. An Introduction to the Botany of Tropical Crops. 2nd Edn., Longman Group Limited, London, pp: 371


  • Flint, M.L. and R. van den Bosch, 1981. Introduction to Integrated Pest Management. Plenum Press, New York, pp: 237


  • Grainge, M. and S. Ahmed, 1988. Handbook of Plants with Pest Control Properties. 1st Edn., Johan Wiley and Sons, New York, ISBN: 0471632570, pp: 470


  • IITA, 1989. Research Brief. Vol. 9, International Institute of Tropical Institute, Ibadan, Nigeria


  • Ivbijaro, M.F. and M. Agbaje, 1986. Insecticidal activities of Pipper guineense schum and thorn and Capsicum species on the cowpea bruchids, Callosobruchus maculatus (F.). Insect Sci. Appl., 7: 521-524.
    PubMed    


  • Iwuala, M.O.E., I.U.W. Osisiogu and E.O.P. Agbakwuru, 1981. Dennetia oil, a potential new insecticide: Tests with adults and nymphs of Periplanata americana and Zonozerus variegates. J. Econ. Entomol., 74: 249-252.


  • Jackai, L.E.N. and R.A. Daoust, 1986. Insect pests of cowpeas. Annu. Rev. Entomol., 31: 95-119.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Lajide, L., C.O. Adedire, W.A. Muse and S.O. Agele, 1998. Insecticidal Activity of Powders of Some Nigerian Plant Against the Maize Weevil (Sitophilus zeamais Motsch). In: Entomology in the Nigerian Economy: Research Focus in the 21st Century. Entomological Society of Nigeria (ESN), Lale, N.E.S., N.B. Molta, P.O. Donli, M.C. Dike and M. Aminu-Kano (Eds.). Occasional Publications, Maiduguri, Nigeria


  • Lale, N.E.S., 1992. A Laboratory study of the comparative toxicity of products from three spices to the maize weevil. Postharvest Biol. Technol., 2: 61-64.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Malik, M.M. and S.H.M. Naqvi, 1984. Screening of some indigenous plants as repellents or antifeedants for stored grain insects. J. Stored Prod. Res., 20: 41-44.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Odeyemi, O.O., R.A. Owoade and R. Akinkurolere, 2000. Toxicity and population suppression effects of Parkia clappertoniana on dried fish pests (Dermestes maculatus and Necrobia rufipes). Global J. Pure Applied Sci., 6: 191-195.


  • Ohiagu, C.E., 1986. Grain legumes, production and storage methods in Nigeria. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Development of Storage Methods in Nigeria, held at the Department of Agricultura Science, Ramat Polytechnic, Maiduguri, Nigeria.


  • Okunade, S.O., J.O. Williams and M.H. Ibrahim, 2002. Comparative efficacy of twelve botanicals and two synthetic insecticides against the Lesser Grain Borer, Rhyzopertha dominica Fabricius (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) on stored sorghum. Nig. J. Entomol., 191: 22-30.


  • Okunade, S.O., J.O. Williams and M.H. Ibrahim, 2002. Effects of some botanicals on the rust-red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) (Coleoptera: Bostrichidae) on stored millet. Samaru J. Agric. Res., 18: 75-82.


  • Oliver-Bever, B., 1986. Medinal Plants in Tropical West Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK


  • Purseglove, J.W., 1974. Tropical Crops: Dicotyledons. Longmans, London, UK., pp: 719


  • Rachie, K.O. and L.M. Roberts, 1974. Grains legumes of the low-land tropics. Adv. Agron., 26: 1-13.


  • Rehm, S. and E. Gustav, 1991. The Cultivated Plants of the Tropics and Subtropics: Cultivation, Economic Value, Utilization. Verlag Josef Margraf, Weikersheim, Germany, ISBN: 3-8236-1169-0, pp: 552


  • Schavenberg, P. and F. Paris, 1977. Guide to Medicinal Plants. Lutterworth Press, London, UK


  • Schwab, A.I., I. Jager, G. Stoll, R. Gorgen, S. Prexler-Schwab and R. Altenburger, 1995. Pesticides in Tropical Agriculture: Hazards and Alternatives. Margraf, Weikersheim, Germany, ISBN 10: 3823612433


  • Seck, D., 1993. Resistance to Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) (Col., Bruchidae) in some cowpea varieties from Senegal. J. Stored Prod. Res., 29: 49-52.


  • Singh, S.R., R.A. Luse, K. Leuschner and D. Nangju, 1978. Groundnut oil treatment for the control of Callosobruchus maculatus (F.) during cowpea storage. J. Stored Prod. Res., 14: 77-80.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Singh, S.R., L.E.N. Jackai, J.H.R. Santos and C.B. Adalla, 1990. Insect Pests of Cowpea. In: Insect Pests of Tropical Legumes, Singh, S.R. (Ed.). John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, pp: 43-49


  • Stanton, W.R., T. Doughty, R. Orraca-tetteh and W. Steele, 1966. Grain Legumes in Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, pp: 183


  • Singh, S.R., B.B. Singh, L.E.N. Jackai and B.R. Ntare, 1983. Cowpea research at IITA: Information series No. 14. International Institute Tropical Agriculture, Ibadan, Nigeria, pp: 20.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved