HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2006 | Volume: 9 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 1047-1051
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2006.1047.1051
Isozyme Variation and Relationships of Selected Acacia Species
Nor Aini Ab. Shukor, K. C. Tee and C. John Keen

Abstract: The investigation of the extent and pattern of genetic variation for isozyme analysis of five selected Acacia species (Acacia crassicarpa, Acacia hybrid, Acacia mangium, Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia aulacocarpa) were carried out using the horizontal starch gel electrophoresis. The analyses on 21 enzymes were coded by 43 loci in A. crassicarpa, 46 loci in A. aulacocarpa, 47 loci in Acacia hybrid, A. mangium and A. auriculiformis. The levels of polymorphic loci for these species ranged from 0.4898 in A. crassicarpa and A. auriculiformis to 0.6596 in Acacia hybrid. Meanwhile, the mean observed heterozygosity varied from 0.1057 in A. auriculiformis to 0.1645 in A. aulacocarpa. Low levels of genetic variability were found in A. crassicarpa, A. mangium and A. auriculiformis but were high in the Acacia hybrid and A. aulacocarpa. The extent of genetic identities ranged from 0.7225 to 0.8778. The least related species were A. mangium and A. auriculiformis, while the most related species were the Acacia hybrid and A. mangium. These species were clustered into three main phylogenetic groups. Factors involving geographical distribution, population size, selection and ecological background were suggested to explain for the polymorphism, heterozygosity paradox and the genetic identity of these species. The Acacia hybrid was identified to be the most promising species in terms of its genetic variability.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
Nor Aini Ab. Shukor, K. C. Tee and C. John Keen, 2006. Isozyme Variation and Relationships of Selected Acacia Species. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 9: 1047-1051.

Keywords: genetic identity, isozyme variation, heterozygosity, polymorphic and Acacia

INTRODUCTION

In Malaysia, the establishment of plantation trial plots and commercial forest plantation in Peninsular Malaysia has started since the 1920’s. Due the to problems with recalcitrant seeds and long rotation cycles of indigenous species, forest plantations have resorted to exotic species such as Tectona grandis, Pinus caribaea, Acacia mangium and Gmelina arborea (Zuhaidi and Ahmad, 1995). The genus Acacia has been considered as the most promising species for forest plantation as it covers a wide range of habitat. Similarities in certain morphological characteristics have created identification problems. Thus correct identification of species is crucial especially in initializing a tree improvement program.

Genetic markers derived from electrophoretic analysis can be used to survey the level of genetic diversity within and among populations and also for taxonomic purpose (Ikediobi and Igboanusi, 1983). Isozyme studies (Moran et al., 1989a; Hamidi, 1990; Wickneswar and Norwati, 1993; Wickneswari, 1989; John Keen, 1996) conducted on Acacia species have been confined to a particular species such as A. mangium, A. crassicarpa and A. auriculiformis. In fact, very few studies have emphasized on the interspecific variation within the genus.

Trees are genetically variable in their natural population and the amount of variation is dependent on the species level. Sufficient genetic variability is needed to improve forest trees since genetic variation within a population is the raw material upon which evolutionary changes occur. Thus, the amount, the cause and the nature of variation in a species must be determined before embarking on any tree improvement program especially when dealing with exotic species.

Knowledge of genetic diversity among and within species is needed for all conservation purposes. Information on the baseline diversity, either measured or predicted, is essential in deciding what and how to conserve, accession of genetic changes and genetic parameters that are relevant in a conservation plan. It can sometime goes beyond the inventory or description of taxa and genetic variation (Millar and Westfall, 1992). In isozyme analysis, the estimates of genetic variation are usually quantified in terms of number of polymorphic loci per species, the effective number of alleles per locus and the number of heterozygoies loci per individual (Hamrick, 1983).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five Acacia genus i.e., A. mangium, A. auriculiformis, A. aulacocarpa, A. crasslcarpa and Acacia hybrid (A. mangium x A. auriculiformis) were sampled. A. mangium and A. auriculiformis were collected from a species trial plot at Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor (latitude 03°02’N, longitude 101°42’E, 20 m a.s.1). A. crassicarpa was sampled from a provenance trial in UPM, Serdang, Selangor (latitude 03°02’N, longitude 101°42’E, 32 m a.s.1 ) whereas A. aulacocarpa from Compartment 10, Block C of Sg. Buluh Reserve Forest, Selangor (latitude 03°13’N, longitude 101°34’E, 40 m a.s.1). The Acacia hybrid was obtained from the Forest Research Institute of Malaysia (FRIM), Kepong, Selangor (latitude 03°13’N, longitude 101 °38’E, 38 m a.s.1).

Electrophoresis: An amount of 0.6 g of leaf sample was homogenized in liquid nitrogen and was ground using pestle and mortar until powder form and the extraction buffer was added. Samples were kept in a freezer until ready for use. Starch gel was prepared using 10.5% hydrolyzed potato starch. Electrophoretic run was carried out in a 4°C refrigerator with the appropriate electric current or voltage depending on the buffer used different combinations of enzyme and buffer systems were used.

Four electrophoretic buffer systems were used i.e., Histidine (H), Lithium (L), Morpholine Citrate (MC), Tris Citrate (TC). The recipes for these buffers were adopted from the previous experiments on Acacia species (Moran et al., 1989a; Wickneswari and Norwati, 1993; John Keen, 1996). The recipes were as below:

Histidine (H) - Gel buffer: 0.005 M histidine HCI at pH 8.0. Tray buffer: 0.41 M tri sodium citrate pH 8.0.
Lithium (L) - Gel buffer: 9 parts of 0.065 M tris plus 0.001 M citric acid (monohydrate) and 1 part of tray buffer, pH 8.2. Tray buffer 0.05 M lithium hydroxide, 0.19 M boric acid pH 8.5
Morpholine Citrate (MC) - Gel buffer 1 in 20 dilution of tray buffer. Tray buffer 0.04 M citric acid (monohydrate) pH 6.1
Tris Citrate (TC) - Gel buffer: 0.1 M tris 0.0069 M citric acid (monohydrate) at pH 8.6. Tray buffer: 0.3M boric acid, 0.1 M NaOH pH 8.6

Alleles of each loci were labeled as Very Fast (VF), Fast (F), Medium (M), Slow (S), Very Slow (VS) whereas each locus was numbered according to its decreasing anodal mobility. The parameters calculated include genetic frequencies, the proportion of polymorphic loci and the observed expected heterozygosities according to Ferguson (1980). A dendrogram was constructed using the Unweighted Pair Group Method with Arithmetic Means (UPGMA) based on the genetic identity values.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Based on the interspecific variation of the 21 enzymes used, (Table 1), the average number of alleles per locus ranged from 1.87 to 2.04. The observed heterozygosities for the species were 0.1496±0.0303 for A. crassicarpa, 0.1496±0.0271 for A. hybrid, 0.1206±0.0249 for A. auriculiformis, 0.1057±0.0217 for A. mangium and 0.1645±0.0282 for A. aulacocarpa. Meanwhile, the expected heterozygosities for the respective species were 0.2713±0.0404, 0.3437±0.0370, 0.2612±0.0381, 0.2671±0.0407 and 0.2991±0.0383. These values were accordant with the range of heterozygosity reported on tropical trees i.e., 0.1000 to 0.2160 by Hamrick and Loveless (1986) and Loveless and Hamrick (1987). When compared to the interspecific variation of the same genus, these values were found to be within the range of A. crassicarpa (Moran et al., 1989a; John Keen, 1996), A. auriculiformis (Moran et al., 1989a; Wickneswari and Norwati, 1993) and Acacia mangium (Moran et al., 1989a; Hamidi, 1990). The values however were found to be lower than those reported on Acacia albida (0.3120) (Joly et al., 1992) and A. melanoxylon (0.1770) (Playford et al., 1993).

The proportion of polymorphic loci for the 5 selected Acacia species ranged from 48.94 to 65.96% (Table 1). This was found to be moderately high when compared to other species of the same genus (Wickneswari and Norwati, 1993; John Keen, 1996; Playford et al., 1993; Khasa et al., 1994; Moran et al., 1989b). However, the values w ere relatively lower than other tropical species (Joly et al., 1992; Danzamann and Burchert, 1983; Chamberlain et al., 1994; Kim et al., 1997). Among the species studied, Acacia hybrid and A. auIacocarpa were found to produce high proportion of polymorphic loci of 0.6596 and 0.5745, respectively (Table 1).

Heterozygosity in isozyme data has been reported to be influenced by factors such as the number and types of enzyme gene loci studied. Most of the enzymes used in this study i.e., ADK, GD, MDH, MR and SDH were polymorphic thus made the estimation of the variation to be relatively high. Furthermore, discrepancies in diversity estimation among different studies, even on the same species, could also occur if the number of loci controlling an enzyme were interpreted differently by different investigators. In addition, the number of populations screened could also influence the estimation, especially when the population size differed among studies.

Normally, good growth is expected when trees were grown in research plots or artificial stands due to the uniform treatment and considerable stable environment.

Table 1: Variation and relationship of selected Acaia species

Table 2:
Nei’s (1978) coefficient of genetic identities among five Acacia species of selected Acacia species

This climatic stability was hypothesized to have provided a refuge for the species planted and permit the species to be less variable and carry a relatively low proportion of polymorphic loci. Harper (1977), Mitton and Aadalora (1981) has reported that trees in a monoculture plantation would allocate more energy for their growth and less energy to increase heterozygosities and proportion of polymorphic loci. This could probably explain for the low heterozygosities (i.e., 0.150, 0.121 and 0.106) and proportion of polymorphic loci (0.4894, 0.5106 and 0.4894) for A. crassicarpa, A. auriculiformis and A. mangium (Table 1). This findings could further be supported with a finding by Dusan (1992) on Picea abies, where low level of heterozygosities (H = 0.275) were found in trees raised in artificial stand when compared to those found in a virgin jungle (H = 0.322).

Higher genetic diversity and proportion of polymorphic for a species can be useful for adaptation, especially when it is planted under an undesirable and harsher conditions. Normally, polymorphism is required as part of the adaptive strategies for a population from a heterogeneous environment of the forest (Feret and Bergmann, 1976). Such adaptation would normally be expressed in a form of higher heterozygosity and this will enable the species to survive (Rosman and Nor Aini, 1993). In this study, the high value of the parameters in A. aulacocarpa were essential to fit the harsher growing conditions since the population was planted in a rocky area and exposed to high wind speed from a highway nearby. Furthermore, high density planting of the species on this site might have forced the species to undergo competition for space and energy. Yap (1987) has earlier reported that the site has been abandoned and has caught fire before planting. Thus this species was believed to possess high heterozygosities which enable them to survive under these limiting factors.

Geographic range relating to its distribution could also give a significant effect on the levels of genetic diversity among species. Conkle (1992) and Hamrick et al. (1992) reported that widespread species with significant ranges of latitudes and elevations have higher proportion of polymorphic and heterozygosities than the more geographically restricted species. In this case, A. aulacocarpa is more widely spread with distribution ranging from New South Wales to southern Papua New Guinea (6-31°S) than A. auriculiformis (5-17 oS), A. crassicarpa (8-20 oS) and A. mangium (1-18 oS). Thus, A. aulacocarpa should have higher values for these genetic parameters. In addition, Moran et al. (1989b) reported that A. mangium has a remarkably low level of isozyme variation because of its restricted occurrence. The higher values of heterozygosities and polymorphism in A. hybrid were mainly due to the combined genotypes of A. mangium and A. auriculiformis, which leads to heterosis and hybrid vigor.

Nei’s coefficient of genetic identities for all possible combinations among five species (Table 2) and genetic identities ranged from 0.7314 to 0.8879. The combination of A. auriculiformis-Acacia hybrid exhibited the highest genetic identity with I = 0.8879, while the A. crassicarpa- A. auriculiformis combination gave the lowest genetic identity (I) of 0.7314.

The dendrogram constructed based on genetic identities (Table 2) to observe the relationships among the species formed 3 main clusters or phylogenetic groupings. The first cluster with the highest genetic identity of 0.8778 was between A. hybrid and A. mangium indicating that A. hybrid and A. mangium were genetically similar. In addition, this can also suggests that they might share similar ancestry. Similar explanation can also be used to explain the second grouping between A. auriculiformis, A. aulacocarpa and A. crassicarpa, which formed another phylogenetic arm.

Since the hybrid in this study was a combination between A. mangium and A. auriculiformis, the clustering of A. mangium-Acacia hybrid was mainly due to the similarity of genetic structure within them. A. auriculiformis as another parent tree for the hybrid progeny, although it did not form the same cluster, produced high genetic identity of 0.8690 with Acacia hybrid.

A. auriculiformis formed a clustered with A. aulacocarpa with genetic identity value of 0.8660. Clustering of A. auriculiformis-A. aulacocarpa was expected since their morphologies have been reported as similar by Turnbull (1986). However A. crassicarpa, which shares similar morphology, formed another phylogenetic arm. Wright (1976) noted that the closer the two species in terms of their taxonomic relationship could indicate the great possibility of hybridizing them. This information can be used as an empirical basis to study the possibility of natural hybridization and controlled pollination among possible related species.

The result of this study indicated that the variations among these species were relatively low with heterozygosities ranging from 0.1056 in A. mangium to 0.1645 in A. aulacocarpa. Meanwhile, the proportion of Polymorphic loci (P) was found to range from 0.4894 A. crassicarpa to 0.6596 in Acacia hybrid. Levels of genetic identities obtained from this study were relatively high ranging from 0.7225 to 0.8778. The lowest genetic identity is between A. mangium and A. auriculiformis, while the highest is between Acacia hybrid and A. mangium. These species formed three main phylogenetic groups. Group I consisted of Acacia hybrid and A. mangium, while Group II consisted of A. auriculiformis and A. aulacocarpa. Group III formed a single phylogenetic arm of A. crassicarpa.

REFERENCES

  • Zuhaidi, Y.A. and D. Ahmad, 1995. Penubuhan ladang hutan di Malaysia. Perhutanan dan Alam Sekitar, pp: 104-108.


  • Chamberlain, J.R., E.E. Hughes and N.W. Galwey, 1994. Patterns of isozyme in the Leucaena shannoii Alliance (Leguminosea Mimosoideae). Silvae Genet., 45: 1-7.


  • Conkle, M.T., 1992. Genetic Diversity Seeing the Forest Through the Trees. In: Population Genetics of Forest Trees, Adam, W.T., S.H. Strauss, D.L. Copes and A.R. Griffin (Eds.). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp: 5-22


  • Danzamann, R.G. and G.P. Burchert, 1983. Isozyme variability in Central Ontario Jack Pine. Proceedings of 28ht Northeast Forest Tree Improvement Conference of Natural Environmental Resources, (NFTIC'1983), University of New Hampshire, pp: 232-248.


  • Dusan, G., 1992. Effect of stand origin on the genetic diversity of Norway spruce (Pice a abies Karst) populations. Forest Ecol. Manage., 54: 215-223.


  • Feret, P.P. and F. Bergmann, 1976. Gel Eletrophoresis of Protein and Enzyme. In: Modern Methods III Forest Genetics, Mikscha, J.P. (Ed.), Springr Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp: 49-77


  • Ferguson, A., 1980. Biochemical Systematic and Evolution. Blackie, Glasgow and London, pp: 194


  • Hamidi, A.H., 1990. Isozyme variation of Acacia mangium willd. B.Sc. Thesis, Agricultural Science Universiti Pertanian Malaysia.


  • Hamrick, J.L., 1983. The Distribution of Genetic Variation Within and Among Natural Plan Populations. In: Genetics and Conservation a Reference for Managing Wild Animal and Plant Population, Cox, E.M.S., M. Chamber, B. MacBryde and W.L. Thomas (Eds.). Benjamin Cummings London, London, pp: 335-348


  • Hamrick, J.L. and M.D. Loveless, 1986. Isozyme variation in tropical trees procedures and preliminary results. Biotropica, 18: 201-207.
    Direct Link    


  • Hamrick, J.L., M.J.W. Godt and S.L. Sherman-Broyles, 1992. Factors influencing levels of genetic diversity in woody plant species. New Forests, 6: 95-124.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • Harper, J.L., 1977. Population Biology of Plants. 1st Edn., Academy Press, London


  • Ikediobi, C.O. and L.C. Igboanusi, 1983. Identification of yam (Dioscorea spp.) species and cultivars by use of electrophoretic patterns of soluble tuber proteins. Biotropica, 15: 65-67.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    


  • John Keen, E., 1996. Genetic variaton of Acacia crassicarpa A. Cunn. Ex. Benth by isozyme and RAPD analyses. B.Sc. Thesis, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia, Selangor, Malaysia.


  • Joly, H.I., M.Z. Nlo, P. Danthu and E. Aygalent, 1992. Population genetics of an African Acacia, Acacia albida.I. Genetic diversity of populations from West Africa. Aust. J. Bot., 40: 59-73.
    Direct Link    


  • Khasa, P.D., W.M. Cheliak and J. Boousquet, 1994. Genetic variation in 26 populations of Racosperma auriculiforme and Rascoperma mangium using allozymes. Can. J. Forest Res., 24: 1123-1132.


  • Kim, Z.S., S.W. Lee and J.W. Hwang, 1997. Genetic diversity and structure of natural populations of Pinus thunbergii in Korea. Silvae Genet., 46: 120-124.
    Direct Link    


  • Loveless, M.D. and J.L. Hamrick, 1987. Distribution de la variacious genetic a en especies arboreas tropicales. Rev. Biol. Trop., 35: 165-175.


  • Millar, C.I. and R.D. Westfall, 1992. Allozyme markers in forest genetic conservation. New Forester, 6: 347-371.
    CrossRef    


  • Mitton, J.B. and R. Aadalora, 1981. Genetic and morphological relationships between blue spruce Picea pungens and Englemann spruce Picea engelmannii in the Colorado front range. Can. J. Bot., 59: 2088-2094.


  • Moran, G.F., O. Mauna and J.C. Bell, 1989. Acacia mangium a tropical forest tree of the coastal lowlands with low genetic diversity. Evolution, 43: 231-235.
    Direct Link    


  • Moran, G.F., O. Mouna and J.C. Bell, 1989. Breeding system and genetic diversity in Acacia auriculiformis and Acacia crassicarpa. Biotropica, 21: 250-256.


  • Playford, J., J.E. Bell and G.F. Moran, 1993. A major disjunction in genetic diversity over the geographic range of Acacia melanoxylon R. Br. Aust. J. Bot., 41: 355-368.
    Direct Link    


  • Rosman, A. and A.S. Nor Aini, 1993. Isozyme variation between two closely related species (Crangon crangon L.) and Crangon allamanni (Decapoda, Cariba). Crustaceae, 64: 114-121.


  • Turnbull, J.W., 1986. Multipurpose Australian Trees and Shrubs Lesser Known Species for Fuelwood and Agroforestry. ACIAR, Canberra, pp: 128-129


  • Wickneswari, R., 1989. Use of isozyme analysis in a proposed Acacia mangium x Acacia Auriculiformis hybrid seed production orchard. J. Trop. Forest Sci., 2: 157-164.


  • Wickneswari, R. and M. Norwati, 1993. Genetic diversity of natural populations of Acacia auriculiformis. Aust. J. Bot., 41: 65-77.
    Direct Link    


  • Wright, J.W., 1976. Information to Forest Genetics. Academic Press, London, pp: 65-82


  • Yap, S.K., 1987. Introduction of Acacia Species to Peninsular Malaysia. In: Australian Acacias in Developing Countries, Turnbull, J.W. (Eds.). ACIAR, Canberra, pp: 151-153

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved