HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2004 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 6 | Page No.: 937-942
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2004.937.942
Infestation of Earias spp. on Cotton and Okra Grown as Mono and Mix Crops
G. H. Abro, A. J. Memon, T. S. Syed and A.A. Shaikh

Abstract: Studies were carried out to investigate the effect of growing of cotton and okra as mono and mix crops or polycultures on percent infestation of Earias spp. on cotton and okra under field conditions. The results revealed that Earias spp. infestation on okra appeared about 45 days after sowing of the crop; whereas, on cotton the pest appeared atleast one month later than it appeared on okra. Two years data indicated a highly significant (F=14.36; DF = 6, 3, P<0.01) difference in percent infestation of Earias spp. on different mono and mix crops of cotton and okra. The highest Earias spp. infestation (18.45%) was recorded on okra grown as mono crop followed by okra mix, cotton mono crop and cotton mix crop with percent infestation of 10.29, 5.97 and 3.90, respectively. It was concluded that okra could be used as a trap crop for the population management of Earias spp. in cotton crop.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
G. H. Abro, A. J. Memon, T. S. Syed and A.A. Shaikh, 2004. Infestation of Earias spp. on Cotton and Okra Grown as Mono and Mix Crops. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 7: 937-942.

Keywords: pest infestation, earias spp. trap crop and mono crop

INTRODUCTION

The spotted bollworm, Earias spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is a very serious and polyphagous pest attacking many plants of Malvaceae family. Cotton and okra are economically the most important crops attacked by this pest. Two species, that is, Earias vittella and Earias inisulana are widely distributed in North Africa, Indo-Pakistan sub-continent and other countries of the world[1]. The pest is active almost throughout the year on its different host plants under field conditions[2,3]. In cotton crop, its initial attack is noticed in June and July. The attack on the bolls is generally higher than buds. Maximum infestation is recorded during August and September[4]. As a result of attack the quality and quantity of the cotton is reduced. A single larva can destroy several buds and bolls in its life. Among bollworms, Earias spp. are more abundant on cotton in Sindh as compared to other bollworm species[5] and cause 3.8 to 12.6% damage[6]. Whereas, Abro et al.[32] have reported 1.79 to 2.38% infestation of cotton bolls due to Earias spp.

Earias spp. are also serious pests of okra, they attack growing points, but when fruiting bodies start to appear, feed mostly inside squares, flowers and fruits. A larva damages several fruiting bodies in its life span. The economic injury level of Earias spp. on okra is reported to be 5.3% damage[7] and about 36% of harvestable fruits are damaged by Earias spp.[8]. Various authors have reported the damage caused by Earias spp. to okra crop for example, Srinivanan and Krishnakumar[9] reported 9.3% infestation of E. vittella. Dhawan and Sindhu[10] observed maximum damage of 67.7% caused to fruits and 25.04% to buds of okra by Earias spp. in late October. Earias spp. is more severer in Indo-Pakistan sub-continent than other countries of the world[1]. The most common host plants of Earias spp. in Pakistan are okra, cotton, Gul-e-Khera, Althea rosea and a weed, Abutilon indicum.

Intercropping or mix cropping involving simulataneous growing of two or more crops on the same piece of land is known as poyculture[11], creates plant diversity which affects the population dynamics of insect herbivores in agricultural and natural communities[12-14]. In general, specialist insect herbivores exhibit lower population densities and damage in diverse habitats compared with simple habitats[15,16]. Numerous studies on pest population density and crop yield losses indicated that 56% of herbivores had lower population densities, 16% had higher densities and 28% had similar or variable densities in polycultures compared with mono cultures[11,13,17]. Since Earias spp. are major pests of cotton and okra in Sindh, Pakistan. No research work is reported on their comparative levels of infestation on cotton and okra and effect of mixed cropping with non-host crops on the level of infestation in cotton and okra. Therefore, present study were conducted to investigate the effect of mono and mix cropping on infestation of Earias spp. in cotton and okra. Such studies will help in the understanding of the ecology and population management of these pests under field conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study on the effect of mono and mix cropping on level of infestation of Earias spp. in cotton and okra crops was carried out at the Latif Experimental Farm, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Pakistan during early and late summer 1997 and early summer 1998 seasons. Cotton, Gossypium hirsutum (cv. NIAB-78); okra, Abelmoschus esculentus (cv. Pusa Sawami), guar, Cyemopsis psoraloides; mung, Phaseolus aureus, till, Sesamum indicum and maize, Zea mays were selected for the study. The criterion for selection of crops was that crops selected must belong to different taxonomic categories and should have almost the same plant height so that they should not cause shade on neighbouring crop plants. The crops were planted on March 11, 1997. The second late summer experiment was carried out on August 11, 1997, while the third experiment was sown on March 10, 1998.

Experimental design: All the experiments were laid out in a completely randomized block design with four replications. The treatment size was 20x40 ft. All agronomic practices were carried out as usual. The experimental plots did not receive any insecticide sprays. A constant row to row space of 75 cm was maintained in all the treatment plots.

The mono crop treatments were maintained by growing either cotton or okra in a pure stand, while intercrop combinations were obtained by planting complete rows of different crop plants at random.

Sampling: Earias spp. infestation in mono and mix crops cotton and okra was assessed by estimating the damage caused by borer. The percentage fruit damaged by larvae of Earias spp. was evaluated by counting the total and attacked number of fruits in a sample of five plants selected at random per treatment. The observations were taken in the morning hours at weekly intervals. The data were recorded from 45 days after sowing of seeds in the field till harvest of the crop.

All the data obtained were subjected to the analysis of variance (ANOVA) and standard error of the mean (SEM) was calculated. Means were separated by LSD range test[18].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Cotton: The results of Earias spp., infestation in cotton grown as mono and mix crops are shown in Table 1. The results show that pest appearance in cotton grown as mono crop was recorded in the second week of July with 1.09% infestation. The pest infestation in cotton remained fluctuating throughout the season. The infestation of Earias spp. in case of cotton grown as a mix crop started in the first week of June (Table 1) and remained fluctuating erratically throughout the season. The highest infestation (17.08%) was recorded in the fourth week of September.

Table 1:
Percent infestation of Earias spp. on cotton and okra fruits grown as mono and mixed crops under field conditions during early summer 1997 (X±SE)
Means followed by same letter(s) are not significantly different from each other (P<0.05) by LSD method.

Table 2:
Percent infestation of Earias spp. on cotton and okra fruits grown as mono and mixed crops under field conditions during late summer 1997 (X±S.E.)
Mean followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different from each other (P<0.05) by LSD method.

The overall seasonal mean infestation of Earias spp. in cotton grown as mono and mix crops was 2.40 and 2.71%, respectively. Earias spp. appeared approximately 15 days later on cotton as monocrop than it appeared on cotton grown as a mix crop under field (Table 1). Comparison of seasonal infestation means of Earias spp. on cotton grown as mix crops and mono crop by t-test indicated that differences between infestation means were non-significant.

A further analysis of data in Table 1 indicated that the seasonal infestation means of Earias spp. on okra grown as mono crop was significantly higher (P<0.001) than on cotton mono crop and okra grown as mix crops also had infestation significantly (P<0.01) higher than it was on cotton mix crop (Table 1).

Earias spp. infestation in cotton grown as mono and mix crops during late summer crop is shown in Table 2 indicated that pest infestation occurred on November 01, 1997 and disappeared in the second week of December in both crops. The highest overall percent infestation was observed in okra grown as mono crop (24.95%) followed by okra mixed crop (12.10%), cotton mix crops (6.50% and cotton mono crop (5.61%).

Infestation of Earias spp. in cotton grown as mono and mix crop during 1998 are shown in Table 3. Pest appeared first in cotton grown as mono crop in the fourth week of May, whereas, it appeared almost four weeks later in cotton grown as mix crop. Pest infestation in cotton grown as mono crop was higher than in cotton grown as mix crop. Seasonal mean infestation of Earias spp. in cotton grown as mono crop was significantly (P<0.05) higher than in cotton grown as mix crop. The results also showed that Earias spp., appeared on okra grown as mono and mix crops during fourth week of April, whereas in cotton mono crop it appeared a month later, that is, on May 24 and in cotton mix crop on June 21, 1998. There is a time gap of more than one month in pest appearance on okra and cotton. On overall mean basis, maximum infestation (16.80%) was found on okra grown as mono crop, followed by okra mix crop (10.67%), cotton mono crop (9.89%) and cotton mix crop (2.50%).

The data in Table 4 indicated the overall position of infestation of Earias spp. on okra and cotton grown as mono and mix crops during different seasons and years. The highest infestation (18.45%) was recorded on okra grown as mono crop and the minimum (3.90%) on cotton grown as a mix crop. The Earias spp. infestation on different crops was highly significant (F=14.36, DF=6,3 P<0.01).

Okra: The results of early summer crop shown in Table 1 which indicated the effect of mono and mix cropping on the infestation of Earias spp., in cotton and okra. Infestation of Earias spp. started its occurrence in okra both as mono and mix crops in the fourth week of April. In okra, grown as mono crop infestation started with 2.52% and kept on increasing, although erratically. The first peak of infestation of 14.47% was observed in the fourth week of May, infestation then declined and the second peak was observed as high as 28.25% in the second week of August. The infestation again declined there after. The final infestation peak of 36.95% was recorded in the fourth week of September and then crop was harvested.

Table 3:
Percent infestation of Earias spp., on cotton and okra fruits grown as mono and mixed crops under field conditions during 1998 (X±S.E)
Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different from each other (p<0.05)

Table 4:
Overall percent infestation of Earias spp., on cotton and okra fruits grown as mono and mix crops during 1997 and 1998
Means followed by the same letter(s) are not significantly different from each other (P<0.05)

The infestation of Earias spp. on okra grown as mixed crop along with other crop plants started its occurrence in the fourth week of April with 0.86% infestation. The infestation remained erratic and the first peak of infestation was recorded in the first week of June as 15.38% infestation. The infestation decreased after that and remained fluctuating till the first week of September when the second peak of infestation was recorded (22.38%), infestation remained declining in the subsequent observations till harvest of crop.

The overall seasonal mean infestation of Earias spp. in okra grown as mono and mix crop was 13.61 and 8.10%, respectively. The infestation of Earias spp. in okra grown as mono crop was higher than on okra grown as mix crop, the infestation differences were statistically highly significant (P<0.001).

The results of late summer crop shown in Table 2 revealed that Earias spp. appeared first in okra grown as mono crop during fourth week of September with a maximum infestation of 72.73%. Pest infestation in mix crop was recorded two weeks later. The highest peak in okra grown as mix crop was 29.16% recorded on November, 01. Earias spp., infestation in okra grown as mono crop remained higher than in okra grown as mix crop. The overall seasonal mean infestation of Earias spp., in okra grown as mono and mix crops was 24.95 and 12.10%, respectively. The infestation difference between seasonal means of okra grown as mono and mix crop was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Earias spp. infestation on okra grown as mono and mix crops during 1998 is shown in Table 3. The results showed that Earias spp. appeared on okra grown as mono and mix crops during fourth week of April. The pest remained active in the crop till December, when crop was harvested. Pest infestation was higher on okra grown as mono crop compared with mix crop. The seasonal mean infestation of Earias spp., on okra grown as mono crop was 16.80% which was significantly (P<0.05) higher than on okra grown as mix crop.

Much of the variability in abundance patterns of herbivorous and their natural enemies with respect to vegetational diversity may be a consequent of their range of resource needs. Comparative studies of generalist and specialist herbivores showed that incorporation of nonhosts in the system can result in reduced densities of herbivores. Thus, generalists would be expected to be less sensitive to plant diversity, on an average, than are specialists[19-21]. As such Earias spp. is an specialist herbivore feeding on the host plants which belong to Malvaceae family. It is expected that Earias spp. infestation will be greater on cotton and okra when grown as mono crops compared to mix crops, as has been observed in the present study. Similar results are reported by many workers such as, Letourneau[21] observed Empoasca leaf hoppers more abundant on squash in monoculture than in polyculture. Matteosn[22] sampled insect pests and their natural enemies on cowpea in mono crop and cereal-inter crop plots and found that population of flower thrips, Megalunothrips ajostedti (Trybom) were reduced by 42% and predators mostly Orius spp. by 23% on cowpea in maize intercrop plots. Dash et al.[23] conducted experiments on the effect of mixed and intercropping on the occurrence of some pests in arhar and cotton crops and observed that the incidence of important insect pests in pure cropping situation was higher than in the mixed and intercropping systems. Similarly, Mole et al.[24] reported that cotton cowpea intercropping system recorded minimum incidence of bollworm complex.

Afifi and Hayer[33] studied the effect of intercropping systems on onion and garlic infestation with Thrip tabaci Lind. The T. tabaci numbers were highest on onion alone compared to garlic alone and numbers found in tomato + onion and tomato + onion + garlic plots were significantly lower than in plots of onion and garlic alone. Ofuya[25] made observations on insect infestation and damage in cowpea intercropped with tomato and found that intercropping reduced infestation of cowpea by Empoasca dolichi. Damage by Helicoverpa armigera and pod sucking bugs, Riptortus spp. was also reduced and seed yield was increased in the intercropped cowpeas. Aliyageen and Alghali[26] conducted experiments on the intercropping as a component in insect pest management for grain cowpea production. Intercropping reduced the number of flower thrips and pod sucking bugs but made no difference to the number of pod borers. While, Picano et al.[27] found intercropping tomato with maize reduced the level of attack by Tuta absoluta to stem apices and the leaves and caused greater attack by H. zea to tomato.

The results of presents study indicated that infestation of Earias spp. on okra grown as mono crop appeared earlier than its appearance on cotton. Kumar and Urs[28] also reported infestation of shoots and fruits of okra by E. vittella started in second and sixth week after germination of crop. Infestation of Earias spp. on okra in present study was more severe compared with cotton when sown as mono crops indicating that okra is preferred host of Earias spp. Similar observations are also reported by Dongre and Rahalkar[29] who examined the relaive food plant preference and induction of preference for feeding in larvae of Earias vittella and found that out of five food plants okra was the most preferred food plant. Similarly, Hirmath[30] observed the suitability of common food plants of Earias spp. and observed that under laboratory, the growth of Earias spp. was fastest on okra followed by cotton and hollyhock. In free choice experiments okra was the most preferred host plant for ovoiposition. Thimmalah and Raju[31] conducted experiments on the possibilities of using okra as a trap crop in cotton bollworm management and showed that on an aveage 1.49 to 4.91 and 0.75 to 3.65 eggs of E. vittella per okra fruit were trapped during two year study which constituted 60-70% of eggs. Tomato intercropped with pigeon pea, okra, field bean, sunflower and maize registered 21.9, 16.3, 17.9, 39.3 and 34.3% reductions in fruit borer, H. armigera incidence, respectively, as compared with tomato as mono crop. The reduction in fruit borer incidence was at a maximum (93.5%) when tomato was intercropped with marigold[34]. It could be concluded from the results of present study that okra is a preferred host of Earias spp. Okra could be used as a trap crop for the population management of Earias spp., in cotton.

REFERENCES

  • Abdul-Nasr, S., M.M. Megahed and A.A.M. Mabrouk, 1973. A study on the host plants of the spiny bollworm, Earias insulana (Boisd.) other than cotton and maize (Lepidoptera: Arctiidae). Bull. Soc. Entomol., 56: 151-161.


  • Arif, M.I. and M.R. Attique, 1990. Alternative hosts in carryover of Earias insulana (Boisd.) and Earias vittella F. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Punjab, Pakistan. Pak. Cottons, 34: 91-96.


  • Qureshi, Z.A. and N. Ahmed, 1991. Sex phenomenon`s as strategy to control pink bollworm of cotton in Sindh. Pak. Cottons, 35: 129-144.


  • Leghari, M.A. and A.M. Kalro, 2002. Screening of insecticides against spotted bollworm, Earias sp. of cotton crop. Sindh Balochistan J. Plant Sci., 4: 71-73.


  • Chang, M.S., M.A. Chang, A.R. Lakho and G.H. Tunio, 2002. Screening of newly developed cotton strains at Mirpurkhas against bollworm complex. Sindh Balochistan J. Plant Sci., 4: 135-139.


  • Krishnaiah, K., J.N. Mohan and P.R. Ramachander, 1978. Economic injury level and sequential sampling plan for okra fruit borer, Earias vittella Fab. Bull. Entomol., 19: 114-118.


  • Srinivasan, K. and N.K. Krishnakumar, 1983. Studies on the extentn of loss and economics of pest management in okra. Trop. Pest Manage., 29: 363-370.


  • Dhawan, A.K. and A.S. Sindhu, 1984. Incidence of relative abundance of different species of spotted bollworms on okra at Ludhiana, Punjab. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ., 21: 533-542.


  • Andow, D.A., 1991. Yield loss to arthropods in vegetationally diverse agroecosystems. Envioron. Entomol., 20: 1228-1235.


  • Risch, S.J., M. Attieri and D. Andow, 1983. Agroecosystem diversity and pest control. Data, tentative conclusions and new research directions. Environ. Entomol., 12: 625-629.


  • Bach, C.E. and B.E. Tabashnik, 1990. Effect of non host plant neighbors on population densities and parasitism rates of the diamondback moth (Lepidoptera: Pluttellidae). Environ. Entomol., 19: 987-994.


  • Risch, S.J., 1981. Insect behaviore abundance in tropical monocultures and polycultures. Ecology, 62: 1325-1340.


  • Tahanainen, J.O. and R.B. Root, 1972. The influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology of a specialized herbivore, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Oecologia (Berlin), 10: 321-346.


  • Letourneau, D.K., 1990. Abundance pattern of leaf hopper enemies in pure and mixed stands. Environ. Entomol., 19: 505-509.


  • Matteson, P.C., 1982. The effects of intercropping with cereals and minimal permethrin application on insect pests of cowpea and their natural enemies in Nigeria. Trop. Pest Manage., 28: 372-380.


  • Dash, A.N., H. Mahapatro, N.C. Patnaile and A.C. Pardham, 1987. Effect of mixed and intercropping on the occurrence of some pests in Orissa. Environ. Ecol., 5: 526-530.


  • Mote, U.N., M.B. Patil and A.B. Tambe, 2001. Role of intercropping in population dynamic of major pest of cotton ecosystem. Ann. Plant Prot. Sci., 9: 36-40.


  • Ofuya, T.I., 1991. Observations on insect infestation and damage in cowpea, Vigna unguiculata intercropped with tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum in a rain forest area of Nigeria. Exp. Agric., 27: 407-412.
    CrossRef    


  • Alghali, A.M., 1993. Intercropping as a component in insect pest management for grain cowpea, Vigna unguiculata (wasp.) production in Nigeria. Insect Sci. Applied, 14: 49-54.


  • Picanco, M., N.R. Leite-Gold-Madeira, A.N. Miyamoto and D.J.H. da Silva, 1996. Effect of staking of tomato plants and their poly-cultivation with maize on attack by Scrobipaipuioides absoluta (Meyrick) and Helicoverpa zea (Bod.). Anais Sociedade Entomologica Brasil, 25: 175-180.


  • Kumar, K.K. and K.C.D. Urs, 1988. Population fluctuations of Earias vittella (Fab.) on okra in relation to abiotic factors. Indian J. Plant Prot. 16: 137-142.


  • Dongre, T.K. and G.W. Rahalkar, 1992. Relative host plant preference and induction of preference for feeding behaviour in spotted bollworm. Indian J. Ecol., 19: 61-64.


  • Hiremath, I.G., 1984. Host plant preference of spotted bollworm, Earias sp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Entomon, 9: 185-188.


  • Thimmalah, G. and G.T.T. Raju, 1991. Possibilities of using okra (bhindi) as a trap crop in cotton bollworm management. Curr. Res., 20: 140-142.


  • Abro, G.H., T.S. Syed and Z.A. Dayo, 2003. Varietal resistance of cotton against Earias sp. Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 6: 1837-1839.
    Direct Link    


  • Afifi, F.M.L. and M.F. Haydar, 1990. Effect of different intercropping systems on onion and garlic infestation with the cotton and onion thrips, Thrip tabaci (Lind.). Bull. Fac. Agric. Cairo Univ., 41: 639-648.
    Direct Link    


  • Arain, N., 1974. Studies on the incidence and relative abundance of different species of bollworms at Tandojam. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Sindh, Jamshoro, Pakistan.


  • Andow, D.A., 1988. Management of Weeds for Insect Manipulation in Agroecosystems. In: Weed Management in Agrocosystems: Ecological Approaches, Attieri, M.A. and M. Liebman (Eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL., USA., pp: 265-301


  • Kareiva, P., 1983. Influence of Vegetation Texture on Herbivore Populations Resource Concentration and Herbivore Movement. In: Variable Plants and Herbivores in Matural and Managed Systems, Denno, R.F. and M.S. McClure (Eds.). Academic Press, New York, USA., pp: 259-289


  • Stanton, M.L., 1983. Spatial Patterns in the Plant Community and their Effect Upon Insect Search. In: Herbivorous Insects: Host-seeking Behaviour and Mechanisms, Ahmed, S. (Ed.). Academic Press, New York, USA., pp: 1256


  • Andow, D.A., 1986. Plant Diversification and Insect Population Control in Agroecosystems. In: Some Aspects of Pest Management, Pimentel, D. (Ed.). Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA., pp: 277-386


  • Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Torrie, 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics: Abiometrical Approach. McGraw Hill, NY., USA


  • Srinivasan, K., K.P.N. Moorthy and T.N. Raviprasad, 1994. African marigold as a trap crop for the management of fruit borer Helicoverpa armigera on tomato. Int. J. Pest Manage., 40: 56-63.
    CrossRef    Direct Link    

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved