HOME JOURNALS CONTACT

Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences

Year: 2002 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 5 | Page No.: 529-530
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2002.529.530
Multivariate Analysis in Sorghum
M. Hasanuzzaman, B. K. Biswas, M. S. Alam, H. F. El-Taj and M. R. Amin

Abstract: A total of 33 indigenous cultivars of sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] were grown in replicated trial during rabi season of 1999 to assess genetic divergence based on ten developmental characters. The genotypes were grouped into five clusters. Amongst ten characters, grains/panicle paid maximum contribution towards genetic divergence. The inter-group distances were much longer than the intra-group distances. Cluster III was the largest with 11 genotypes and the cluster II was the smallest with 2 genotypes. Cluster III showed the maximum genetic distance (207.43) from cluster V. Simultaneous consideration of intercluster and intra cluster distances 7 genotypes of cluster I were genetically worthful to initiate the crossing programme for high heterotic effects in segregants. Cluster II exhibited the maximum intra cluster distance (3.15) and had considerable genetical divergence from rest of the clusters. Thus, 2 genotypes belonging to cluster II might be hybridized with the genotypes of other clusters for getting desirable improvement of specific traits in sorghum.

Fulltext PDF Fulltext HTML

How to cite this article
M. Hasanuzzaman, B. K. Biswas, M. S. Alam, H. F. El-Taj and M. R. Amin, 2002. Multivariate Analysis in Sorghum. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 5: 529-530.

Keywords: genotypes, genetic diversity, Sorghum and intercluster and intra cluster

Introduction

Genetic diversity is of turmoil awareness to the plant breeders in the selection of suitable genotypes with higher amount of heterotic effect in F1s and broad spectrum of variability in segregating generations. With the development of advanced biometrical methods such as multivariate analysis (Rao, 1952) based on Mahalanobis (1936) D2 statistics has been found to be a powerful tool to estimate the quantification of the magnitude of genetic divergence among the population (Murty and Arunachalam, 1966). The effectiveness to improve the unknown breeding lines with regard to placement in heterotic groups is possible by employing the level of genetic diversity in the population (Wenzel et al., 1998). With the limits of fitness, the method of D2 statistics has become effective in modeling the actual crosses with a view of getting desired genetic architecture in different crops (Bhutani et al., 1983; Jagadev and Samal, 1991 and Biswas et al., 1993). The technique has been used for realizing the genetic divergence in sorghum by Amiruzzaman et al. (1997) and Barhate et al. (2000). In Bangladesh context, the information on this aspect of sorghum is very scanty. An attempt in the present investigation has been made to assess the extent of divergence for grain yield and its components in 33 sorghum germplasms collected from different parts of Bangladesh.

Materials and Methods

A set of thirty three domestic sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.)] Moench) genotypes were grown at Hajee Mohammad Danesh Agricultural College field laboratory during rabi season of 1999. Each genotype was represented by 2 rows of 3m length with a spacing of 50X30 cm2. Two guard rows along with the length of each replication were grown to avoid the border effect. Five randomly selected plants from each genotype in each replication were taken for recording observations on ten characters viz., days to 50% flowering, days to maturity, plant height (cm), tillers/plant, panicle length (cm), panicle weight (g), grains/panicle, 1000 grains weight, grain yield/plant (g) and fodder yield/plant (g).

Analysis of variance for the individual character and analysis of covariance for character pairs were carried out as described by Cochran and Cox (1957). Wilk criteria was used to test the significance of pooled differences (Singh and Chaudhari, 1977). Genetic divergence was estimated by multivariate analysis using Mohalanobis’s D2 statistics. The genotypes were grouped into different clusters by following Tocher’s method (Rao, 1952).

Results and Discussion

Genetic divergence in the population, specially in respect of the characters in which important is sought for, is an indispensable pre-requisite for successful plant selection work. The germplasms under study were therefore, first of all examined for the variability present in the accessions in respect of yield and yield components. The analysis of variance showed highly significant differences among genotypes for all the characters studied. The pooled differences over characters were also significant (Wilk criteria X2 =2540.58). On the basis of D2 values, the 33 genotypes were grouped into five clusters (Table 1). Cluster III was the largest having II genotypes followed by cluster V with 8, cluster I with 7, cluster IV with 5 and cluster II with 2 genotypes. The maximum intercluster distance was observed between cluster III and V (207.43) followed by cluster I and IV (198.35) while the minimum intercluster distance was found between cluster I and V (58.80). The intra cluster distance varied from 3.15 to 7.28 and the maximum intra cluster distance was found in cluster III with 11 genotypes. Thus, the genotypes of cluster III were highly heterogeneous. Arunachalam et al. (1984) and Mian and Bahl (1989) reported that the parents separated by D2 values of medium magnitude generally showed higher heterosis. As regards, intercluster and intra cluster distances, 7 genotypes of cluster I and 5 genotypes of cluster IV may be incorporated in hybridization programme for exploiting heterosis with sustainable production. The genotypes of cluster III were genetically far away from the genotypes of cluster V but due to the highest intra cluster distance (7.28) in cluster III, there have been a little chance of exploiting heterosis while crossing programme to be initiated between cluster III and V. Cluster II comprised of 2 genotypes and intra cluster distance was minimum (3.15) and the cluster II was genetically diverged from other clusters. The results suggested that the genotypes of cluster II may be crossed with the genotypes of rest of the clusters for improving particular trait in sorghum.

The cluster means of different characters are presented in Table 2 and 3. Cluster IV had the highest mean values for days to 50% flowering, days to maturity and plant height. On the contrary, cluster I had the lowest mean values for days to 50% flowering and days to maturity. The highest mean values for panicle length and panicle weight were scored by the cluster II but the highest mean value for grains/ panicle (3622) was obtained in the cluster I. Moreover, cluster I had the highest grain yield/plant and fodder yield/plant. Endang et al. (1971) stated that clustering pattern offered a better scope in choosing parents for hybridization to generate variability for effective selection of various economic traits in advanced generation. Therefore, the results suggested that days to 50% flowering, days to maturity and grains/panicle were the influential traits for improving yield potential and the genotypes of cluster I were economically worthful.

The contribution of the characters towards genetic divergence was assumed by the cluster means. The contribution paid by a particular character to the genetic divergence is presented in Table 4. The canonical analysis revealed that positive high values were for panicle weight, grains/panicle and grain yield/plant for both vector I and vector II. The results indicated that these characters have exerted maximum load towards genetic divergence.

Table 1: Composition of clusters based on D2 statistics in sorghum

Table 2: Average intra and intercluster D2 values for five clusters in sorghum
The values of bold indicate intra-cluster distance

Table 3: Cluster means for ten characters of 33 sorghum genotypes

Table 4: Relative contributions of ten characters to the total divergence in sorghum
Negative (-) sign stand for direction. Positive (+) sign indicates increasing weight towards divergence and negative (-) sign indicates decreasing weight towards divergence.

Sisodia et al. (1983) reported that days to flowering, panicle length and grains/panicle contributed maximum to the genetic divergence while Tiwari and Singhania (1989) reported that duration of flowering, plant height. whorls/rachis and length of rachis were the important components for genetic divergence in sorghum.

As regards, intercluster and intra cluster distances and cluster means of the important yield components like days to 50% flowering, grains/panicle and grain yield./plant, the 7 genotypes, SB02, SB04, SB07, SB15, SB17, SB24 and SB28 under cluster I were identified as prospective parents for increasing yield potential. Besides, the 2 genotypes, SB22 and SB32 of cluster II were suitable for improving special trait through hybridization programme in sorghum.

REFERENCES

  • Wenzel, W.G., A. Schiemann and F. Ordon, 1998. Genetic diversity among South African sorghum breeding lines and varieties. Int. Sorghum Millets Newslett., 39: 65-66.


  • Barhate, K.K., J.V. Patil and R.Y. Jhete, 2000. Genetic divergence in sorghum under different environments. Indian J. Agric. Res., 34: 85-90.
    Direct Link    


  • Bhutani, R.D., O. Kallo and P.S. Partap, 1983. Genetic divergence among tomato genotypes for quality characters and yield. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 53: 108-111.


  • Biswas, B.K., M.K. Saha, M.S. Alam and M.M. Rahman, 1993. Genetic divergence analysis in niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass). Ann. Bangladash Agric., 3: 51-53.


  • Cochran, W.G. and G.M. Cox, 1957. Experimental Designs. John Willey and Sons, New York, London, pp: 82-90


  • Jagadev, P.M. and K.M. Samal, 1991. Multivariate analysis in niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass). Indian J. Genet., 51: 392-394.


  • Rao, C.R., 1952. Advanced Statistical Methods in Biometrical Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York


  • Singh, R.K. and B.D. Chaudhary, 1977. Biometrical Methods in Quantitative Genetic Analysis. Kalyani Publisher, New Delhi, India, ISBN: 8176633070, Pages: 318
    Direct Link    


  • Tiwari, S.K. and D.L. Singhania, 1989. Analysis of genetic diversity in elite lines of grain sorghum. Ind. J. Heredity., 21: 33-39.


  • Amiruzzaman, M., M.A. Yousuf-Akond, M.A.Z. Choudhury and M.M. Houque, 1997. Genetic divergence in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench). Bangladesh J. Plant Breed. Genet., 10: 45-49.


  • Arunachalam, V., A. Bandyopadhyay, S.N. Nigam and R.W. Gibbons, 1984. Heterosis in relation to genetic divergence and specific combining ability in groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Euphytica, 33: 33-39.
    Direct Link    


  • Endang, S., S. Andani and H. Nasoetin, 1971. Multivariate classification of some rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties and strain on yield components. Int. Rice Comm. Newslett., 20: 26-34.


  • Mian, M.A.K. and P.N. Bhal, 1989. Genetic divergence and hybrid performance in chickpea. Indian J. Genet., 49: 119-124.


  • Mahalanobis, P.C., 1936. On the generalised distance in statistics. Proc. Nat. Inst. Sci. India, 2: 49-55.
    Direct Link    


  • Murty, B.R. and V. Arunachalam, 1966. The nature of divergence in relation to breeding systems in some crop plants. Indian J. Genet., 26A: 188-198.


  • Sisodia, N.S., A. Henry and Y.K. Gupta, 1983. Genetic divergence in grain sorghum. Madras Agric. J., 70: 678-680.

  • © Science Alert. All Rights Reserved